Evaluation and comparison of eighteen SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays from seven different companies to assess its diagnostic role in SARS-CoV-2 infections.

The diagnostic performance of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) decreases during the late acute stage of the corona virus disease (COVID-19) infection; hence, serological assays can be used for disease diagnosis in patients non-protected through vaccinations at this stage. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody tests in current/past infections, determine proper testing time, and check the accuracy of cutoff values. In this study, 18 Ig (immunoglobulin) G, IgM, IgA, and total antibody serological assays were performed using 839 samples. Positive sera (n=132) were collected during the first 5 months after the patients were symptomatic and tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test; they were grouped as 0-10, 10-15, >15 days according to the symptom onset. Negative sera (N=707) were obtained from patients with lupus before the pandemic. The performance of IgG and total antibody assays was better than those of IgA, IgM, and IgA-IgM for all post-symptom groups except for 0-10 days, which showed lower Ig assay sensitivity. During 10-15 and >15 days, >70% sensitivity to IgA, IgM, IgM-IgA assays and lower sensitivity were noted, respectively. The sensitivities of IgG and total antibody assays for group C were slightly lower than that of group B. There were no significant differences, but there were higher correlations between the methods or antigenic structures. Receiving operating characteristics (ROC) analysis revealed better cutoff values. For the diagnosis of late acute/past SARS-CoV-2 infection, serological tests can be performed on unvaccinated patients showing symptoms for ≥10 days. SARS-CoV-2 IgG and total antibodies were better diagnostic markers than IgM, IgA, and IgM+IgA, which were restricted to group B.

Simple concentration method enables the use of gargle and mouthwash instead of nasopharyngeal swab sampling for the diagnosis of COVID-19 by PCR.

Since its emergence in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 is causing one of the most devastating pandemics in human history. Currently, the most important method for definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 is identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swab samples by RT-PCR. Nasopharyngeal swab sampling is a discomforting procedure sometimes with adverse effects, which also poses a risk for infection for the personnel performing the sampling. We have developed a new method for concentrating biological samples, which enabled us to use gargle and mouthwash samples to be used in RT-PCR, for the diagnosis of COVID-19, as an alternative to nasopharyngeal swab samples. We have analyzed nasopharyngeal and gargle and mouthwash samples, before and after concentration, of 363 patients by RT-PCR for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Among 114 patients in which SARS-CoV-2 was identified in at least one of their samples, the virus was identified in 76 (66.7%), 67 (58.8%), and 101 (88.6%) of nasopharyngeal swab, gargle, and mouthwash samples before and after concentration, respectively. When concentrated by our new method, gargle and mouthwash samples can be used instead of nasopharyngeal samples in identification of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, with the same or better sensitivity. Eliminating the need for nasopharyngeal sampling will save the patients from an invasive and painful procedure and will lower the risk of infection for the healthcare personnel taking the sample. This easy sampling procedure may decrease the workload of hospitals, shorten the turnaround time of obtaining test results, and thus enable rapid isolation of infected patients.

Sepsis biomarkers for early diagnosis of bacteremia in emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: We compared the diagnostic values of individual and composite biomarkers used in the prediction of bacteremia in adult emergency department patients. METHODOLOGY: First-hour blood levels of C- reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6, lactate, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and white blood cell count were collected from a 30-person control group and 47 adult patients. Patients included in this study were admitted to the emergency department on suspicion of sepsis. We categorized patients according to presence/absence of sepsis and bacteremia. Our control group was categorized as S-B -, septic patients with bacteremia were S+B+, and septic patients without bacteremia were S+B-. RESULTS: All biomarkers showed a statistically significant elevation when S+B- and S+B+ groups were compared with the S-B-. When S+B+ group was compared with the S+B- group only procalcitonin and lactate levels had statistically significant elevation (p < 0.005). Regression analysis demonstrated that lactate and procalcitonin were independently associated with having bacteremia in the state of sepsis and Hosmer-Lemeshow score was 0.772. The areas under the curve (AUC) values of biomarkers procalcitonin, lactate, C-reactive protein, combined 1 (procalcitonin+ lactate), and combined 2 (procalcitonin + lactate + C-reactive protein) were 0.773, 0.744, 0.523, 0.806, and 0.829 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of tests such as combined 1 or combined 2 were highly predictive of bacteremia in adult septic patients. Combined 2 demonstrated the best predictive performance and could be utilized as a tool to assist diagnosis of bacteremia before culture results are available.

COVID-19 Disease in a Kidney Transplant Recipient With Diffuse Intrarenal Hemorrhage.

Presentation of COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients is similar to that shown in the nonimmunocompromised population; almost all recipients who have this disease present with symptoms of the respiratory system. Acute kidney injury has been found prevalent in transplant recipients with COVID-19. In those with severe COVID-19 disease who transfer to an intensive care unit prevalence of acute kidney injury is more than 50%. The pathophysiological mechanisms of kidney involvement and the type of involvement are unclear. Here, we present a 71-year-old kidney transplant recipient who was admitted to our hospital with pulmonary and renal involvement. A kidney allograft biopsy demonstrated diffuse intrarenal hemorrhage, capillary congestion, and severe acute tubular injury. COVID-19 RNA was detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction from lysed allograft tissues, but no findings of acute or chronic cellular or antibody-mediated rejection were detected. This case indicates that COVID-19 may involve the allograft by causing hemorrhage within the renal parenchymal via direct or indirect pathways.