Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?

OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD). METHODS: This prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in IHD patients prescribed cefazolin 2 g three times weekly. Plasma samples were collected at prespecified timepoints and assayed for total and unbound concentrations using validated LC. Pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics®. PTA in plasma suitable for MSSA (unbound trough concentrations of ≥2 mg/L for the final 24 h of a 72 h interval) were simulated for different dosing regimens. A PTA of ≥95% was deemed acceptable. RESULTS: A total of 260 cefazolin concentrations (130 total, 130 unbound) were collected from 16 patients (14 female) with a median age of 51 years. The median (IQR) pre-dialysis unbound cefazolin concentration for a 3 day dose interval trough was 17.7 (13.5-31.4) mg/L. The median (IQR) unbound fraction was 0.38 (0.32-0.46). The lowest pre-dialysis unbound concentration was 9.1 mg/L. A two-compartment model with a complex protein-binding component adequately described the data. The mean unbound cefazolin CL during IHD was 16.4 ±â€Š4.26 L/h, compared with 0.40 ±â€Š0.19 L/h when dialysis was off. Duration of time on haemodialysis (TOH) was the only covariate supported in the final model. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen was associated with a PTA of 99.7% on dosing simulations to maintain unbound concentrations of ≥2 mg/L with TOH of 6 months. The 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis was associated with a PTA of 95.4%. CONCLUSIONS: A 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis cefazolin regimen is supported for MSSA infections.

Validating a novel three-times-weekly post-hemodialysis ceftriaxone regimen in infected Indigenous Australian patients-a population pharmacokinetic study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the total and unbound population pharmacokinetics of a 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis ceftriaxone regimen in Indigenous Australian patients requiring hemodialysis. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic study was carried out in the dialysis unit of a remote Australian hospital. Adult Indigenous patients on intermittent hemodialysis (using a high-flux dialyzer) and treated with a 2 g three-times-weekly ceftriaxone regimen were recruited. Plasma samples were serially collected over two dosing intervals and assayed using validated methodology. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed using Pmetrics in R. The probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment (unbound trough concentrations ≥1 mg/L) and toxicity [trough concentrations (total)  ≥100 mg/L] were simulated for various dosing strategies. RESULTS: Total and unbound concentrations were measured in 122 plasma samples collected from 16 patients (13 female) with median age 57 years. A two-compartment model including protein-binding adequately described the data, with serum bilirubin concentrations associated (inversely) with ceftriaxone clearance. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen achieved 98% probability to maintain unbound ceftriaxone concentrations ≥1 mg/L for a serum bilirubin of 5 µmol/L. Incremental accumulation of ceftriaxone was observed in those with bilirubin concentrations >5 µmol/L. Three-times-weekly regimens were less probable to achieve toxic exposures compared with once-daily regimens. Ceftriaxone clearance was increased by >10-fold during dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis ceftriaxone regimen can be recommended for a bacterial infection with an MIC ≤1 mg/L. A 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis regimen is recommended for those with serum bilirubin ≥10 µmol/L. Administration of ceftriaxone during dialysis is not recommended.