Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure by echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is widely used to evaluate left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients suspected of heart failure. For patients in sinus rhythm, a combination of several echocardiographic parameters can differentiate between normal and elevated LV filling pressure with good accuracy. However, there is no established echocardiographic approach for the evaluation of LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. The objective of the present study was to determine if a combination of several echocardiographic and clinical parameters may be used to evaluate LV filling pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: In a multicentre study of 148 atrial fibrillation patients, several echocardiographic parameters were tested against invasively measured LV filling pressure as the reference method. No single parameter had sufficiently strong association with LV filling pressure to be recommended for clinical use. Based on univariate regression analysis in the present study, and evidence from existing literature, we developed a two-step algorithm for differentiation between normal and elevated LV filling pressure, defining values ≥ 15 mmHg as elevated. The parameters in the first step included the ratio between mitral early flow velocity and septal mitral annular velocity (septal E/e'), mitral E velocity, deceleration time of E, and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Patients who could not be classified in the first step were tested in a second step by applying supplementary parameters, which included left atrial reservoir strain, pulmonary venous systolic/diastolic velocity ratio, and body mass index. This two-step algorithm classified patients as having either normal or elevated LV filling pressure with 75% accuracy and with 85% feasibility. Accuracy in EF ≥ 50% and EF < 50% was similar (75% and 76%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation, no single echocardiographic parameter was sufficiently reliable to be used clinically to identify elevated LV filling pressure. An algorithm that combined several echocardiographic parameters and body mass index, however, was able to classify patients as having normal or elevated LV filling pressure with moderate accuracy and high feasibility.

Correcting bias in cardiac geometries derived from multimodal images using spatiotemporal mapping.

Cardiovascular imaging studies provide a multitude of structural and functional data to better understand disease mechanisms. While pooling data across studies enables more powerful and broader applications, performing quantitative comparisons across datasets with varying acquisition or analysis methods is problematic due to inherent measurement biases specific to each protocol. We show how dynamic time warping and partial least squares regression can be applied to effectively map between left ventricular geometries derived from different imaging modalities and analysis protocols to account for such differences. To demonstrate this method, paired real-time 3D echocardiography (3DE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sequences from 138 subjects were used to construct a mapping function between the two modalities to correct for biases in left ventricular clinical cardiac indices, as well as regional shape. Leave-one-out cross-validation revealed a significant reduction in mean bias, narrower limits of agreement, and higher intraclass correlation coefficients for all functional indices between CMR and 3DE geometries after spatiotemporal mapping. Meanwhile, average root mean squared errors between surface coordinates of 3DE and CMR geometries across the cardiac cycle decreased from 7 ± 1 to 4 ± 1 mm for the total study population. Our generalised method for mapping between time-varying cardiac geometries obtained using different acquisition and analysis protocols enables the pooling of data between modalities and the potential for smaller studies to leverage large population databases for quantitative comparisons.

Roadmap for an imaging and modelling paediatric study in rural NZ.

Our study methodology is motivated from three disparate needs: one, imaging studies have existed in silo and study organs but not across organ systems; two, there are gaps in our understanding of paediatric structure and function; three, lack of representative data in New Zealand. Our research aims to address these issues in part, through the combination of magnetic resonance imaging, advanced image processing algorithms and computational modelling. Our study demonstrated the need to take an organ-system approach and scan multiple organs on the same child. We have pilot tested an imaging protocol to be minimally disruptive to the children and demonstrated state-of-the-art image processing and personalized computational models using the imaging data. Our imaging protocol spans brain, lungs, heart, muscle, bones, abdominal and vascular systems. Our initial set of results demonstrated child-specific measurements on one dataset. This work is novel and interesting as we have run multiple computational physiology workflows to generate personalized computational models. Our proposed work is the first step towards achieving the integration of imaging and modelling improving our understanding of the human body in paediatric health and disease.

Automated model calibration with parallel MCMC: Applications for a cardiovascular system model.

Computational physiological models continue to increase in complexity, however, the task of efficiently calibrating the model to available clinical data remains a significant challenge. One part of this challenge is associated with long calibration times, which present a barrier for the routine application of model-based prediction in clinical practice. Another aspect of this challenge is the limited available data for the unique calibration of complex models. Therefore, to calibrate a patient-specific model, it may be beneficial to verify that task-specific model predictions have acceptable uncertainty, rather than requiring all parameters to be uniquely identified. We have developed a pipeline that reduces the set of fitting parameters to make them structurally identifiable and to improve the efficiency of a subsequent Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis. MCMC was used to find the optimal parameter values and to determine the confidence interval of a task-specific prediction. This approach was demonstrated on numerical experiments where a lumped parameter model of the cardiovascular system was calibrated to brachial artery cuff pressure, echocardiogram volume measurements, and synthetic cerebral blood flow data that approximates what can be obtained from 4D-flow MRI data. This pipeline provides a cerebral arterial pressure prediction that may be useful for determining the risk of hemorrhagic stroke. For a set of three patients, this pipeline successfully reduced the parameter set of a cardiovascular system model from 12 parameters to 8-10 structurally identifiable parameters. This enabled a significant ( > 4 × ) efficiency improvement in determining confidence intervals on predictions of pressure compared to performing a naive MCMC analysis with the full parameter set. This demonstrates the potential that the proposed pipeline has in helping address one of the key challenges preventing clinical application of such models. Additionally, for each patient, the MCMC approach yielded a 95% confidence interval on systolic blood pressure prediction in the middle cerebral artery smaller than ±10 mmHg (±1.3 kPa). The proposed pipeline exploits available high-performance computing parallelism to allow straightforward automation for general models and arbitrary data sets, enabling automated calibration of a parameter set that is specific to the available clinical data with minimal user interaction.

MITEA: A dataset for machine learning segmentation of the left ventricle in 3D echocardiography using subject-specific labels from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) in echocardiography is an important task for the quantification of volume and mass in heart disease. Continuing advances in echocardiography have extended imaging capabilities into the 3D domain, subsequently overcoming the geometric assumptions associated with conventional 2D acquisitions. Nevertheless, the analysis of 3D echocardiography (3DE) poses several challenges associated with limited spatial resolution, poor contrast-to-noise ratio, complex noise characteristics, and image anisotropy. To develop automated methods for 3DE analysis, a sufficiently large, labeled dataset is typically required. However, ground truth segmentations have historically been difficult to obtain due to the high inter-observer variability associated with manual analysis. We address this lack of expert consensus by registering labels derived from higher-resolution subject-specific cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images, producing 536 annotated 3DE images from 143 human subjects (10 of which were excluded). This heterogeneous population consists of healthy controls and patients with cardiac disease, across a range of demographics. To demonstrate the utility of such a dataset, a state-of-the-art, self-configuring deep learning network for semantic segmentation was employed for automated 3DE analysis. Using the proposed dataset for training, the network produced measurement biases of -9 ± 16 ml, -1 ± 10 ml, -2 ± 5 %, and 5 ± 23 g, for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, ejection fraction, and mass, respectively, outperforming an expert human observer in terms of accuracy as well as scan-rescan reproducibility. As part of the Cardiac Atlas Project, we present here a large, publicly available 3DE dataset with ground truth labels that leverage the higher resolution and contrast of CMR, to provide a new benchmark for automated 3DE analysis. Such an approach not only reduces the effect of observer-specific bias present in manual 3DE annotations, but also enables the development of analysis techniques which exhibit better agreement with CMR compared to conventional methods. This represents an important step for enabling more efficient and accurate diagnostic and prognostic information to be obtained from echocardiography.

Systematic Comparison of Left Ventricular Geometry Between 3D-Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Aims: Left ventricular (LV) volumes estimated using three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-echo) have been reported to be smaller than those measured using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, but the underlying causes are not well-understood. We investigated differences in regional LV anatomy derived from these modalities and related subsequent findings to image characteristics. Methods and Results: Seventy participants (18 patients and 52 healthy participants) were imaged with 3D-echo and CMR (<1 h apart). Three-dimensional left ventricular models were constructed at end-diastole (ED) and end-systole (ES) from both modalities using previously validated software, enabling the fusion of CMR with 3D-echo by rigid registration. Regional differences were evaluated as mean surface distances for each of the 17 American Heart Association segments, and by comparing contours superimposed on images from each modality. In comparison to CMR-derived models, 3D-echo models underestimated LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) by -16 ± 22, -1 ± 25, and -18 ± 24 ml across three independent analysis methods. Average surface distance errors were largest in the basal-anterolateral segment (11-15 mm) and smallest in the mid-inferoseptal segment (6 mm). Larger errors were associated with signal dropout in anterior regions and the appearance of trabeculae at the lateral wall. Conclusions: Fusion of CMR and 3D-echo provides insight into the causes of volume underestimation by 3D-echo. Systematic signal dropout and differences in appearances of trabeculae lead to discrepancies in the delineation of LV geometry at anterior and lateral regions. A better understanding of error sources across modalities may improve correlation of clinical indices between 3D-echo and CMR.