Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ophthalmology ; 120(2): 260-5, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23107580

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To identify effective methods to increase the number of cataract surgeries in a rural setting in Pucheng County of Shaanxi Province, northwestern China. DESIGN: Community-based randomized interventional study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty-two patients 50 years of age or older with operable cataract who had not undergone surgery 3 months after participation in a cataract outreach screening program. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-five (82.2%) patients eligible for surgery, but not scheduling it on their own, were contacted and were assigned randomly into 4 groups. Participants in group 1 (n = 86) were given informative reminders by telephone or in person by a trained facilitator about undergoing low-cost cataract surgery. Group 2 (n = 86) was offered free cataract surgery. Group 3 (n = 90) was offered free surgery and reimbursement of transportation expenses. Group 4 (n = 93) was provided with free rides from home to hospital in addition to the reminder and free surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of participants undergoing cataract surgery after interventions. RESULTS: In total, 94 patients (26.5%) underwent cataract surgery after interventions. In group 1, 13 patients (14.4%) underwent surgery, which was significantly lower than the number in group 2 (n = 25 [27.8%]; P = 0.027), group 3 (n = 28 [31.1%]; P = 0.012), and group 4 (n = 26 [28%]; P = 0.038). There were no significant differences between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.768) or between groups 2 and 4 (P = 0.869). CONCLUSIONS: Provision of free cataract surgery was twice as effective as giving patients an informative reminder when it came to increasing the uptake of cataract surgery. However, offering reimbursement of transportation expenses or provision of free rides had minimal added impact on the response rate of participants to undergo cataract surgery.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata/economía , Catarata/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , China/epidemiología , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/organización & administración , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Selección Visual , Agudeza Visual/fisiología
2.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 28(3): 205-212, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822250

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate willingness to pay for cataract surgery, and its associations, in Northwestern China. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-eight persons aged 50 years and above, diagnosed with cataract indicated for surgery, identified in an outreach screening program were included. Subjects were offered a willingness-to-pay interview for the maximal amount that the subjects would be willing to pay for a cataract surgery. Age, gender, literacy, education level, occupation, and annual household income were recorded. RESULTS: Among 328 (74.9%) subjects who completed the interview, 197 (60.1%) participants were willing to pay something for the cataract surgery (mean, 902.9 ± 856.7 renminbi[RMB], [US$ 145 ± 137]; median, 500RMB, US$ 78). Individuals with presenting visual acuity (PVA) in the worse eye ≤6/60 (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.2) and a high annual household incomes (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 0.9-4.6) were likely to be willing to pay for the surgery, as revealed in the regression models. Willingness to pay any amount for cataract surgery was more likely among literate persons (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.4) and persons with non-agricultural occupation (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.0-3.2). CONCLUSIONS: The amount that subjects were willing to pay is significantly less than the current cost of cataract surgery (5000 RMB, US$320) in the area. Providing low-cost cataract surgery to patients in a financially sustainable manner is important to increase uptake of cataract surgery among rural residents in Northwest China.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata , Catarata , Catarata/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 213: 235-243, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846622

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of rapid assessment of avoidable blindness (RAAB). DESIGN: Population-based diagnostic accuracy study. METHODS: A total of 2145 (95.3%, 2145/2250) subjects aged 50 years and older who participated in the RAAB survey were included. All the recruited participants underwent ophthalmic examination according to the RAAB protocol and then were reexamined with instruments in a mobile eye clinic set up in a village center on the same day. Examination in the mobile clinic included standardized visual acuity (VA) tests using logMAR charts, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and dilated fundal examination with a binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. Blindness and economic blindness were defined as VA in the better-seeing eye <3/60 and <6/60, respectively. Visual impairment (VI) was defined as VA <6/18 in the better eye. The primary cause of blindness and VI was defined according to the cause of VI in the participant's better eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics of RAAB for detection of blindness and the principal causes of VI. RESULTS: A total of 1816 subjects (84.7%), including 686 men (37.8%) and 1130 women (62.2%), underwent ophthalmic examination in the mobile eye clinic. The mean (±standard deviation) age was 64.4 ± 9.6 years. The sensitivities, specificities, AUC, PLR, and NLR of RAAB were 90.3%, 99.3%, 0.948, 124.0, and 0.10, respectively, for detection of blindness (presenting visual acuity, PVA <3/60); 89.5%, 98.7%, 0.940, 69.2, and 0.11, respectively, for detection of economic blindness (PVA <6/60); and 90.3%, 97.7%, 0.940, 38.7, and 0.10, respectively, for detection of VI (PVA <6/18). The sensitivities, specificities, AUC, PLR, and NLR were 90.5%, 98.1%, 0.943, 48.1, and 0.10; and 60.4%, 98.7%, 0.796, 46.4, and 0.40 for detection of VI (PVA <6/18) owing to cataract and refractive error, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performances of RAAB were high for detecting the prevalence of blindness, VI, and VI owing to cataract.


Asunto(s)
Ceguera/diagnóstico , Baja Visión/diagnóstico , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Ceguera/epidemiología , Ceguera/etiología , Catarata/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Errores de Refracción/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Distribución por Sexo , Microscopía con Lámpara de Hendidura , Pruebas de Visión , Baja Visión/epidemiología , Baja Visión/etiología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Personas con Daño Visual/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA