Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for Common Gastroenterology Services Over 15 Years: 2007-2022.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated trends in Medicare reimbursement for common gastrointestinal (GI) services from 2007 to 2022. METHODS: Top GI procedures and office/inpatient visits were identified. The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was queried to extract reimbursement data. Reimbursement trends were analyzed, accounting for inflation. RESULTS: GI procedures exhibited an average decrease in unadjusted and adjusted reimbursement of 7.0% and 33.0%, respectively. Reimbursement for patient visits exhibited an inflation-adjusted decrease of 4.9%. DISCUSSION: The analysis revealed a steady decline in adjusted reimbursement for both GI procedures and patient visits in the past 15 years.

Strengthening the Public Health Impacts of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Through Policy.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the cornerstone of the US nutrition safety net. Each month, SNAP provides assistance to 40 million low-income Americans-nearly half of them children. A number of changes could strengthen the public health impacts of SNAP. This review first presents a framework describing the mechanisms through which SNAP policy can influence public health, particularly by affecting the food security, the diet quality, and, subsequently, the health of SNAP participants. We then discusspolicy opportunities with the greatest potential to strengthen the public health impacts of SNAP, organized into three areas: (a) food production and distribution, (b) benefit allocation, and (c) eligibility and enrollment. For each section, we describe current policy and limitations of the status quo, suggest evidence-based opportunities for policy change to improve public health, and identify important areas for future research.

Reported Political Participation by Physicians vs Nonphysicians.

This study uses survey data to compare rates of political participation between US physicians and nonphysicians from 2017 to 2021.

Disparities in Cancer Mortality among Disaggregated Asian American Subpopulations, 2018-2021.

Federal, state, and institutional data collection practices and analyses involving Asian Americans as a single, aggregated group obscure critical health disparities among the vast diversity of Asian American subpopulations. Using from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Underlying Causes of Death database, we conducted a cross-sectional study using data on disaggregated Asian American subgroups (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, other Asians) between 2018 and 2021. We examine deaths from 22 cancer types and in situ, benign neoplasms, identified using ICD-10 codes C00-C97 and D00-D48. Overall, our study comprised 327,311 Asian American decedents, with a mean age of death at 70.57 years (SD=2.79), wherein females accounted for approximately half of the sample (n=36,596/73,207; 49.99%). Notably, compared to the aggregated Asian American reference group, we found higher proportions of deaths from total cancers among Chinese (25.99% vs. 22.37% [ref]), Korean (25.29% vs. 22.37% [ref]), and Vietnamese (24.98% vs. 22.37% [ref]) subgroups. In contrast, total cancer deaths were less prevalent among Asian Indians (17.49% vs. 22.37% [ref]), Japanese (18.90% vs. 22.37% [ref]), and other Asians (20.37% vs. 22.37% [ref]). We identified further disparities by cancer type, sex, and age. Disaggregated data collection and analyses are imperative to understanding differences in cancer mortality among Asian American subgroups, illustrating at-risk populations with greater granularity. Future studies should aim to describe the association between these trends and social, demographic, and environmental risk factors.

Disaggregating Asian-American Mortality in Drug-Related Overdoses and Behavioral Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Asian Americans have been historically underrepresented in the national drug overdose discourse due to their lower substance use and overdose rates compared to other racial/ethnic groups. However, aggregated analyses fail to capture the vast diversity among Asian-American subgroups, obscuring critical disparities. We conducted a cross-sectional study between 2018 and 2021 examining Asian-American individuals within the CDC WONDER database with drug overdoses as the underlying cause of death (n = 3195; ICD-10 codes X40-X44, X60-X64, X85, and Y10-Y14) or psychoactive substance-related mental and behavioral disorders as one of multiple causes of death (n = 15,513; ICD-10 codes F10-F19). Proportional mortality ratios were calculated, comparing disaggregated Asian-American subgroups to the reference group (Asian Americans as a single aggregate group). Z-tests identified significant differences between subgroups. Compared to the reference group (0.99%), drug overdose deaths were less prevalent among Japanese (0.46%; p < 0.001), Chinese (0.47%; p < 0.001), and Filipino (0.82%; p < 0.001) subgroups, contrasting with a higher prevalence among Asian Indian (1.20%; p < 0.001), Vietnamese (1.35%; p < 0.001), Korean (1.36%; p < 0.001), and other Asian (1.79%; p < 0.001) subgroups. Similarly, compared to the reference group (4.80%), deaths from mental and behavioral disorders were less prevalent among Chinese (3.18%; p < 0.001), Filipino (4.52%; p < 0.001), and Asian Indian (4.56%; p < 0.001) subgroups, while more prevalent among Korean (5.60%; p < 0.001), Vietnamese (5.64%; p < 0.001), Japanese (5.81%; p < 0.001), and other Asian (6.14%; p < 0.001) subgroups. Disaggregated data also revealed substantial geographical variations in these deaths obscured by aggregated analyses. Our findings revealed pronounced intra-racial disparities, underscoring the importance of data disaggregation to inform targeted clinical and public health interventions.

Naloxone Online Information Exceeds the Recommended Reading Level for Patient Education Materials.

OBJECTIVE: The opioid epidemic claimed 68,630 lives in 2020 in the United States. It reached record levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public comprehension of naloxone, the reversal agent for opioid overdoses, is necessary for its broad uptake and the prevention of opioid-related deaths. This study assesses whether online patient education materials for naloxone meet national readability guidelines. It further compares the readability of naloxone materials to that of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) materials, given that the latter is an established and widespread life-saving procedure. METHOD: We searched Google in March 2022 for three terms: "naloxone," "Narcan," and "CPR." The top 15 websites for each term were retrieved, processed, and inputted into a readability calculator to generate six validated reading scale scores. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the readability of naloxone/Narcan online information against national standards and the readability of CPR online information. RESULTS: The average readability of naloxone/Narcan websites was grade 11.2 ± 2.3, and none of the websites met the recommended sixth-grade reading level for patient education materials. In comparison, the average readability of CPR websites was 7.8 ± 1.5. Of the naloxone/Narcan websites, only 17% (4/24) had a readability at or below the eighth-grade level, the average reading level of U.S. adults. In comparison, 80% (12/15) of the CPR websites had a readability at or below the eighth-grade level. CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone online information exceeds the recommended reading level and that of CPR materials. Online information about naloxone should be simplified to broaden educational access to this life-saving medication.

Distribution and Disparities of Industry Payments to Radiologists (2016-2020).

BACKGROUND: The frequency, magnitude, and distribution of industry payments to radiologists are not well understood. RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of industry payments to physicians working in diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and radiation oncology, study the categories of payments and determine their correlation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Open Payments Database from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services was accessed and analyzed for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. Payments were grouped into six categories: consulting fees, education, gifts, research, speaker fees, and royalties/ownership. The total amount and types of industry payments going to the top 5% group were determined overall and for each category of payment. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2020, a total of 513 020 payments, amounting to $370 782 608, were made to 28 739 radiologists suggesting that approximately 70% of the 41 000 radiologists in the US received at least one industry payment during the 5-year period. The median payment value was $27 (IQR: $15-$120) and the median number of payments per physician over the 5-year period was 4 (IQR: 1-13). Gifts were the most frequent payment type made (76.4%), but accounted for only 4.8% of payment value. The median total value of payments earned by members of the top 5% group over the 5-year period was $58 878 (IQR: $29 686-$162 425) ($11 776 per year) compared to $172 (IQR: $49-877) ($34 per year) in the bottom 95% group. Members of the top 5% group received a median of 67 (IQR: 26-147) individual payments (13 payments per year) while members of the bottom 95% group received a median of 3 (IQR: 1-11) (0.6 payments per year). CONCLUSION: Between 2016 and 2020, industry payments to radiologists were highly concentrated both in terms of number/frequency and value of payments.

Industry Payments to Radiologists During the Last 5 Years and Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the trends in industry payments to radiologists and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including trends in different categories of payments. METHODS: The Open Payments Database from CMS was accessed and analyzed for the period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. Payments were grouped into six categories: consulting fees, education, gifts, research, speaker fees, and royalties or ownership. The total number, value, and types of industry payments to radiologists were subsequently determined and compared pre- and postpandemic from 2016 to 2021. RESULTS: The total number of industry payments and the number of radiologists receiving these payments dropped by 50% and 32%, respectively, between 2019 and 2020, with only partial recovery in 2021. However, the mean payment value and total payment value increased by 177% and 37%, respectively, between 2019 and 2020. Gifts and speaker fees experienced the largest decreases between 2019 and 2020 (54% and 63%, respectively). Research and education grants were also disrupted, with the number of payments decreasing by 37% and 36% and payment value decreasing by 37% and 25%, respectively. However, royalty or ownership increased during the first year of the pandemic (8% for number of payments and 345% for value of payments). CONCLUSIONS: There was significant decline in overall industry payments coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic, with biggest declines in gifts and speaker fees. The impact on the different categories of payments and recovery in the last 2 years has been heterogeneous.

Completion of Recommended Tests and Referrals in Telehealth vs In-Person Visits.

Importance: Use of telehealth has increased substantially in recent years. However, little is known about whether the likelihood of completing recommended tests and specialty referrals-termed diagnostic loop closure-is associated with visit modality. Objectives: To examine the prevalence of diagnostic loop closure for tests and referrals ordered at telehealth visits vs in-person visits and identify associated factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a retrospective cohort study, all patient visits from March 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, at 1 large urban hospital-based primary care practice and 1 affiliated community health center in Boston, Massachusetts, were evaluated. Main Measures: Prevalence of diagnostic loop closure for (1) colonoscopy referrals (screening and diagnostic), (2) dermatology referrals for suspicious skin lesions, and (3) cardiac stress tests. Results: The study included test and referral orders for 4133 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.3 [11.7] years; 2163 [52.3%] women; 203 [4.9%] Asian, 1146 [27.7%] Black, 2362 [57.1%] White, and 422 [10.2%] unknown or other race). A total of 1151 of the 4133 orders (27.8%) were placed during a telehealth visit. Of the telehealth orders, 42.6% were completed within the designated time frame vs 58.4% of those ordered during in-person visits and 57.4% of those ordered without a visit. In an adjusted analysis, patients with telehealth visits were less likely to close the loop for all test types compared with those with in-person visits (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47-0.64). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that rates of loop closure were low for all test types across all visit modalities but worse for telehealth. Failure to close diagnostic loops presents a patient safety challenge in primary care that may be of particular concern during telehealth encounters.

The Marketing of Ultraprocessed Foods in a National Sample of U.S. Supermarket Circulars: A Pilot Study.

Introduction: This study aimed to quantify the prevalence of advertisements for ultraprocessed foods and beverages in U.S. supermarket circulars, which are digital and print marketing materials with weekly sales promotions. Methods: Food and beverage advertisements on the first page of 4,181 weekly circulars from 453 stores across 6 states were analyzed from August 2019 to September 2019. Products were classified into 1 of 4 mutually exclusive categories on the basis of the extent and purposes of their industrial processing using a variant of the NOVA classification system adapted for the U.S. food supply: unprocessed and minimally processed, basic processed, moderately processed, and highly processed. Results: A total of 86,099 food and beverage advertisements were classified. Highly processed foods accounted for 45.7% of advertisements, followed by unprocessed/minimally processed foods at 41.2%, moderately processed foods at 8.0%, and basic processed foods at 5.1%. Conclusions: U.S. supermarket circulars advertise a high proportion of processed and highly processed foods and beverages.

Historical lessons for Canada's emerging national school food policy: an opportunity to improve child health. / S'inspirer des expériences passées pour créer la nouvelle politique nationale du Canada en matière d'alimentation dans les écoles : une occasion d'améliorer la santé des enfants.

School meals are one of the most successful drivers of improved health and education. In 2021, the Canadian federal government committed $1 billion over 5 years to develop a national school food policy and work towards a national school nutritious meal program. Canadian policy makers should learn from the experiences of other countries, including the United States' National School Lunch Program. We propose 3 priority areas to maximize health improvements: (1) resisting corporatization and prioritizing health; (2) preventing stigma through universal access; and (3) ensuring cultural inclusion and appropriateness.

Les repas servis à l'école sont l'un des facteurs les plus efficaces contribuant à l'amélioration de la santé et de l'éducation. En 2021, le gouvernement fédéral du Canada a débloqué un milliard de dollars sur cinq ans pour mettre en place une politique nationale en matière d'alimentation dans les écoles et pour élaborer un programme national de repas scolaires. Les décideurs canadiens devraient s'inspirer des expériences d'autres pays, en particulier du Programme de distribution de repas dans les écoles des États-Unis. Nous proposons trois secteurs prioritaires pour maximiser les effets positifs sur la santé : 1) résister à la privatisation et prioriser la santé, 2) prévenir la stigmatisation en assurant l'accessibilité universelle et 3) assurer l'inclusion et la pertinence culturelles.