Percutaneous Intra-arterial Hyaluronidase Injection for Hyaluronic Acid Filler Embolism Threatening Skin Barrier Integrity: Implementation of a Stepwise Treatment Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler-induced vascular embolism that threatens skin integrity is an urgent situation. There is increasing evidence that percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection is an effective therapeutic technique for it. However, until now, there is a lack of a unifying protocol about the technique. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide a conclusion of percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection along with adjunctive measures on the treatment of occlusions precipitated by HA-based filler and develop a stepwise treatment protocol. METHODS: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed studies, consensus statements, case series, and case reports using a variety of keywords. RESULTS: High-dose, pulsed hyaluronidase is the mainstay for the treatment of HA filler-induced embolism, but percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection is a more effective technique. Until now, hyaluronidase is injected into three arteries percutaneously, including facial artery, supratrochlear artery, and superficial temporal artery. Furthermore, the adjunctive measures that may optimize clearance of an occlusion and/or skin barrier repair such as the use of image guidance and CGF should be considered. CONCLUSION: Vascular occlusions that threaten skin integrity are an urgent matter which requires accurate diagnosis and effective intervention. Percutaneous intra-arterial hyaluronidase injection along with adjunctive measures performed in a stepwise manner is key to an optimal outcome. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy of Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Arterial Hyaluronidase Injection for Hyaluronic Acid Filler-Induced Necrosis of Frontotemporal Skin and/or the Ipsilateral Scalp With Subsequent Alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Necrosis of frontotemporal skin and/or the ipsilateral scalp with subsequent alopecia after hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection into the temple is rare complications with superficial temporal artery embolization are suspected as the major pathological mechanism. The main treatment currently is intralesional hyaluronidase (HAase) injection, but the effectiveness of percutaneous superficial temporal arterial HAase injection still lacks consensus. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of superficial temporal arterial HAase injection in dissolving HA filler-induced necrosis of frontotemporal skin and/or the ipsilateral scalp with subsequent alopecia. METHODS: Five recent clinical cases with necrosis of frontotemporal skin and/or the ipsilateral scalp with subsequent alopecia after HA filler injection into the temple were analyzed retrospectively. The patients underwent HAase injection via superficial temporal artery combined with adjunctive treatments, and the clinical progress was observed. RESULTS: Significant improvement was observed in terms of necrosis of frontotemporal skin and the ipsilateral scalp after treatment, and the patients were relieved of their clinical symptoms. Alopecia occurred approximately 1 to 2 weeks after HA filler injection, and the well-defined alopecia areas were formed 15 to 20 days after HAase injection. Patients were followed for 3 to 6 months. During follow-up, the skin lesions of all patients were restored to near normal appearance. Hair regrowth was observed 2 to 3 months after HAase treatment, and hair density nearly reached the normal level 3 to 4 months later. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous superficial temporal arterial HAase injection is an effective treatment option for HA filler-induced necrosis of frontotemporal skin and/or the ipsilateral scalp with subsequent alopecia.

Efficacy of Percutaneous Intraarterial Facial/Supratrochlear Arterial Hyaluronidase Injection for Treatment of Vascular Embolism Resulting From Hyaluronic Acid Filler Cosmetic Injection.

BACKGROUND: Vascular embolism is a serious complication of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler cosmetic injection, and hyaluronidase injection has been proposed as the treatment. Until now, there has been a lack of adequate clinical evidence regarding the benefits of treatment for HA filler-induced vascular embolism by percutaneous facial or supratrochlear arterial hyaluronidase injection. OBJECTIVES: The authors sough to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous facial or supratrochlear arterial hyaluronidase injection as a rescue treatment for HA filler-induced vascular embolism. METHODS: We included 17 patients with vascular embolism after facial HA filler injection. Intraarterial injection of 1500 units hyaluronidase was performed via facial artery for 13 cases with skin necrosis and via supratrochlear arterial for 4 cases with severe ptosis and skin necrosis but no visual impairment. Simultaneously, general symptomatic treatment and nutritional therapy were performed. RESULTS: After hyaluronidase injection, facial skin necrosis in all cases was restored and ptosis in the 4 cases was also significantly relieved. Patients were subsequently followed-up for 1 month to 1 year. The skin necrosis in 16 patients completely healed, and only 1 patient had small superficial scars. CONCLUSIONS: It is effective to alleviate skin necrosis and ptosis resulting from HA filler embolism via percutaneous facial or supratrochlear arterial hyaluronidase injection.

Evaluation of Intraarterial Thrombolysis in Treatment of Cosmetic Facial Filler-Related Ophthalmic Artery Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: With an increase in recent years in the number of people receiving cosmetic facial injection treatments of hyaluronic acid, the incidence of hyaluronic acid embolism has also increased commensurately. Hyaluronic acid embolism leads to serious complications, including blindness, eye and eyelid movement disorders, skin necrosis, and cerebral embolism. However, there is a lack of robust clinical evidence regarding the benefits of treatment for hyaluronic acid embolism by intraarterial thrombolysis therapy. METHODS: This study included 24 patients with a decrease in visual acuity and other complications induced by facial hyaluronic acid injection. Patients underwent emergency intraarterial thrombolysis therapy by injection of hyaluronidase (500 to 1500 units) alone or hyaluronidase (750 to 1500 units) combined with urokinase (100,000 to 250,000 units), followed in both cases by a general symptomatic treatment and nutritional therapy. RESULTS: Ten (42 percent) of 24 patients ultimately had improvements to visual acuity, even when the clinical application of the thrombolytic treatments had passed the recommended window for optimal treatment. In all cases, patients' facial skin necrosis was restored to nearly normal appearance. In addition, the authors found that hyaluronidase combined with urokinase was a more effective therapy than hyaluronidase alone. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' results indicate that intraarterial thrombolysis therapy is beneficial to patients suffering from blindness induced by hyaluronic acid embolism. The therapy was shown to be worthy of clinical application because it alleviated the impairment to patients' vision and was also beneficial in the recovery from other serious complications, including eye movement disorder, eye edema, headaches, and skin necrosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.