Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 49(5): 540-56, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25667196

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the oral and injectable pharmacologic treatment options for type 2 diabetes. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using PubMed electronic database for studies published in English between 1993 and September 2014. Search terms included diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, and the individual name for each antidiabetic medication reviewed. In addition, manual searches were performed for cross-references from publications. Package inserts, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site, Institute for Safe Medication Practices Web site, American Diabetes Association Web site and scientific session poster presentations, and individual drug company Web pages were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: This review focused on information elucidated over the past 10 years to assist prescribers in choosing optimal therapy based on individual patient characteristics. Studies leading to the approval of or raising safety concerns for the antidiabetic medications reviewed in this article were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the past 10 years, there have been 4 novel oral antidiabetic medication classes and 9 new injectable agents and insulin products approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as well as new information regarding the safety and use of several older antidiabetic medication classes. The distinctions were reviewed for each individual agent, and a comparison was completed if there was more than one agent in a particular therapeutic class. Using current information available, select investigational agents in phase III trials or those with a pending new drug application were highlighted. CONCLUSION: There are now 9 distinct oral pharmacologic classes and a variety of insulin and noninsulin injectable medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. When considering options for alternative or additional treatment, prescribers must weigh the benefits and risks using individual patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Metformina/uso terapéutico
2.
Ann Pharmacother ; 49(6): 700-14, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25802244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the oral and injectable pharmacologic treatment options for type 2 diabetes. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using PubMed electronic database for studies published in English between 1993 and September 2014. Search terms included diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, and the individual name for each antidiabetic medication reviewed. In addition, manual searches were performed for cross-references from publications. Package inserts, United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site, Institute for Safe Medication Practices Web site, American Diabetes Association Web site and scientific session poster presentations, and individual drug company Web pages were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: This review focused on information elucidated over the past 10 years to assist prescribers in choosing optimal therapy based on individual patient characteristics. Studies leading to the approval of or raising safety concerns for the antidiabetic medications reviewed in this article were included. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the past 10 years, there have been 4 novel oral antidiabetic medication classes and 10 new injectable agents and insulin products approved by the FDA for the treatment of type 2 diabetes as well as new information regarding the safety and use of several older antidiabetic medication classes. The distinctions were reviewed for each individual agent, and a comparison was completed if there was more than one agent in a particular therapeutic class. Using current information available, select investigational agents in phase III trials or with a pending new drug application were highlighted. CONCLUSION: There are now 9 distinct oral pharmacologic classes and a variety of insulin and noninsulin injectable medications available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Metformin remains the first-line treatment option for most patients. When considering options for alternative or additional treatment, prescribers must weigh the benefits and risks using individual patient characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/administración & dosificación
3.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 134: 38-43, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951338

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant exenatide extended release (ER) therapy in patients treated with regular U-500 insulin. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review at an ambulatory care center in the Midwest, 18 patients with type 2 diabetes being treated with regular U-500 insulin and adjuvant exenatide ER were identified. These patients were evaluated for outcomes following the addition of exenatide ER. The primary outcome was change in HbA1C from baseline to 3, 6, and 12months. Secondary outcomes included change in weight, total daily dose (TDD) of insulin, and hypoglycemia. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed to assess the differences in mean scores over four time periods. RESULTS: A total of 18 of 50 patients met inclusion criteria with sufficient data to be included in analysis. HbA1C showed non-significant findings from baseline to 12months (8.08% vs. 8.23%; p=0.75). A non-significant, modest weight loss occurred (146.4kgvs. 144.2kg; -2.2kg; p=0.31). A significant decrease in TDD of insulin was observed (378 units vs. 326 units; p<0.001). There was a trend towards hypoglycemia from baseline to month 3 post addition of exenatide ER (0.33 events vs. 1.33 events; p=0.055). CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with regular U-500 insulin, adjuvant exenatide ER therapy showed no significant improvement in HbA1C, but did show modest weight loss as well as decreased insulin requirements to achieve a HbA1C that was comparable to baseline.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Ponzoñas/uso terapéutico , Peso Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Exenatida , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Insulina/farmacología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Péptidos/farmacología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ponzoñas/farmacología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA