Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol ; 15: 17562848221074188, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35154389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have improved treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), but loss of response remains a frequent problem. The anti-TNF agent, golimumab, was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of UC in 2014. This study aims to summarize the experience of golimumab in a real-world setting in Switzerland. METHODS: We analyzed real-world data from 1769 UC patients from the Swiss Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort (SIBDC) study and performed a chart review of golimumab-treated patients. We extracted the partial Mayo score at t0 (baseline), t1 (2-16 weeks), t2 (17-35 weeks), and t3 (36-89 weeks). The primary endpoint was clinical response at t1, defined as marked improvement in partial Mayo score and objective parameters. Clinical remission was defined as resolution of symptoms and normalization of objective parameters. RESULTS: Our chart review included 103 UC patients with golimumab treatment (5.8% of all SIBDC UC patients); only 16 (15.5%) were anti-TNF naïve. Sixty-three patients remained on golimumab (61.2%) after 180 days, 51 (44.7%) after 365 days, and 34 (33%) after 630 days after the start of treatment. Upon golimumab treatment, the partial Mayo score decreased from 4 [interquartile range (IQR): 2-6] at t0 to 2 (IQR: 0-4) at t1, 1 (IQR: 0-3.5) at t2, and 1 (IQR: 0-3) at t3 (p < 0.001 for all comparisons with t0). The primary endpoint, clinical response at t1, could be evaluated in 52 patients and was met in 15 individuals (28.8%). Clinical remission at t1 was observed in 8 out of 52 patients (15.4%). Golimumab was generally well tolerated, one patient developed meningitis. The most frequent reasons to stop treatment were primary and secondary non-response. CONCLUSION: Golimumab was used in 5.8% of Swiss UC patients, mainly in biologic-experienced individuals. Golimumab treatment was associated with a sustained reduction of symptoms and clinical response in approximately 30% of patients.[ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00488631].

2.
Circulation ; 112(13): 2002-11, 2005 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16172265

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Drugs released from stents affect the biology of vascular cells. We examined the effect of rapamycin and FK-506 on tissue factor (TF) expression in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells (HAVSMCs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Rapamycin enhanced thrombin- and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-induced endothelial TF expression in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximal increase was 2.5-fold more pronounced than that by thrombin or TNF-alpha alone and was paralleled by a 1.4-fold higher TF surface activity compared with thrombin alone. Rapamycin by itself increased basal TF levels by 40%. In HAVSMCs, rapamycin did not affect thrombin- or TNF-alpha-induced TF expression. In contrast to rapamycin, FK-506 did not enhance thrombin- or TNF-alpha-induced endothelial TF expression. Thrombin induced a transient dephosphorylation of the mammalian target of rapamycin downstream target p70S6 kinase. Rapamycin completely abrogated p70S6 kinase phosphorylation, but FK-506 did not. FK-506 antagonized the effect of rapamycin on thrombin-induced TF expression. Rapamycin did not alter the pattern of p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, or c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase phosphorylation. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that rapamycin had no influence on thrombin-induced TF mRNA levels for up to 2 hours but led to an additional increase after 3 and 5 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Rapamycin, but not FK-506, enhances TF expression in HAECs but not in HAVSMCs. This effect requires binding to FK binding protein-12, is mediated through inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin, and partly occurs at the posttranscriptional level. These findings may be clinically relevant for patients receiving drug-eluting stents, particularly when antithrombotic drugs are withdrawn or ineffective, and may open novel perspectives for the design of such stents.


Asunto(s)
Endotelio Vascular/metabolismo , Sirolimus/farmacología , Tromboplastina/metabolismo , Aorta , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Músculo Liso Vascular/citología , Músculo Liso Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Músculo Liso Vascular/metabolismo , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/citología , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/efectos de los fármacos , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/metabolismo , Proteínas Quinasas/efectos de los fármacos , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Sirolimus/metabolismo , Stents , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR , Tacrolimus/farmacología , Proteína 1A de Unión a Tacrolimus/metabolismo , Tromboplastina/genética
3.
ACG Case Rep J ; 3(3): 165-8, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27144193

RESUMEN

Herpes simplex esophagitis (HSE) is an acute, severe viral infection of the esophagus, rarely occurring in immunocompetent individuals. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a rare immune-mediated esophageal disorder. We recently observed 5 severe HSE cases in diagnosed EoE patients. Four of the 5 patients had active, untreated EoE at the time of infection, so HSE is not likely a side effect of swallowed topical corticosteroids, the first-line medical treatment of EoE. However, this coincidence of these 2 rare conditions raises the question of a causal relationship between these 2 forms of esophagitis, and whether active EoE might predispose to HSE infection.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA