Investigations of injection strategies to use heparinized normal saline instead of contrast media for intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are well established. Intravascular imaging guidance improves short- and long-term outcomes, especially in complex PCI. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has a higher resolution than intravascular ultrasound. However, the usage of OCT is mainly limited by the need to use contrast for flushing injections, which increases the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, especially in patients with underlying chronic kidney disease. The aim of this study was to prove that flushing techniques with normal saline instead of contrast can be used in OCT imaging and can generate high-quality images. METHODS: This prospective single-center observational study included patients with indications for OCT-guided PCI. For OCT pullbacks, heparinized saline was injected by an automatic pump injector at different rates, and additional extension catheters for selective coronary artery engagement were used at the operator's discretion. Recordings were made using the Ilumien Optis OCT system (Abbott) and the Dragonfly (Abbott) catheter and were analyzed at 1-mm intervals by two operators. Pullbacks were categorized as having optimal, acceptable, or unacceptable imaging quality. A clinically usable run was determined if >75% of the region of interest length was described as having optimal or acceptable imaging quality. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were enrolled in the study; 47 different lesions were assessed before and after PCI. In total, 91.5% of runs were described as clinically suitable for use. CONCLUSION: Heparinized saline injections for OCT imaging are effective in generating good-quality OCT images suitable for clinical use.

Quantitative flow ratio vs. angiography-only guided PCI in STEMI patients: one-year cardiovascular outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Coronary physiology-guided PCIs are recommended worldwide. However, invasive coronary physiology methods prolong the procedure, create additional risks for the patients, and prolong the fluoroscopy time for an interventional cardiologist. Otherwise, there is a noninvasive coronary physiology evaluation method, QFR, that can be safely used even in STEMI patients. METHODS: A total of 198 patients admitted with STEMI and at least one intermediate (35-75%) diameter stenosis other than the culprit artery between July 2020 and June 2021 were prospectively included in this single-center study. All patients were randomized into one of two groups (1 - QFR-guided PCI; 2 - visual-estimation-only guided PCI). A 12-month follow-up with echocardiography, exercise stress test, and quality of life evaluation was performed in all included patients. For the QOF evaluation, the Seattle Angina Score Questionnaire was chosen. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-squared test and Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (49.5%) patients were randomized to the first group, and 100 (50.5%) patients were included in the second group. Statistically, significantly more patients had a medical history of dyslipidemia (98 vs. 91, p = 0.002) and slightly better left ventricular ejection fraction (42.21 ± 7.88 vs. 39.45 ± 9.62, p = 0.045) in the QFR group. Six fewer patients required non-culprit artery revascularization within the 12-month FU in the QFR group (1.02% vs. 6%, p = 0.047). Survival analysis proved that patients in the Angio group had a more than 6-fold greater risk for death within a 12-month period after MI (OR 6.23, 95% CI 2.20-17.87, p = 0.006), with the highest mortality risk within the first two months after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Using QFR in non-culprit lesions in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction reduces mortality and revascularization at the 12-month follow-up and improves the quality of life of the patient. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Regional Bioethical Committee and conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and local laws and regulations.

Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessment of Non-Culprit Coronary Artery Lesions During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in 79 Patients Diagnosed with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): A Study from a Single Center in Lithuania.

BACKGROUND Approximately half of the patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have additional stenotic coronary artery (CA) lesions in non-infarct-related arteries (non-IRA). This study from a single center in Lithuania aimed to evaluate the use of the quantitative flow ratio (QFR) in assessing non-IRA lesions during PCI in 79 patients diagnosed with STEMI. MATERIAL AND METHODS We prospectively included 105 vessels of 79 patients with worldwide STEMI criteria and ≥1 intermediate (35-75%) lesion in non-IRA between July 2020 and June 2021. For all included patients, QFR analyses were performed twice, during the index PCI (QFR 1) and during a staged procedure ≥3 months later (QFR 2). The QFR analyses were performed with the QAngio-XA 3D and £0.80 were used as cut-off values for PCI. The primary endpoint was a head-to-head numerical agreement between 2 measurements. RESULTS An excellent numerical agreement was found in all investigated lesions, r=0.931, p<0.001, left anterior descending (LAD) r=0.911, p<0.001, left circumflex (LCx) r=0.977, p<0.001, and right coronary artery (RCA) 0.946, p<0.001. Clinical treatment decision-making showed amazing agreement between the 1st and the 2nd QFR analyses, r=0.980, p<0.001. There was 1 disagreement between QFR 1 and QFR 2. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this support previous studies and showed that the QFR is a practical quantitative method to evaluate non-IRA lesions, which in this study included STEMI patients during PCI following occlusive CA stenosis.

A Simple Strategy to Reduce Contrast Media Use and Risk of Contrast-Induced Renal Injury during PCI: Introduction of an "Optimal Contrast Volume Protocol" to Daily Clinical Practice.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is the leading cause of iatrogenic acute nephropathy. Development of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) increases the risk of adverse long- and short-term patients outcomes, the hospital costs, and length of hospitalization. There are a couple of methods described for CIN prevention (statin prescription, prehydration, contrast media (CM) clearance from the blood system, and decrease amounts of contrast volume). The CM volume to patient's creatinine clearance ratio is the main factor to predict the risk of CIN development. The safe CM to creatinine clearance ratio limits have been established. The usage of CM amount depends on personal operators habits and inside center regulations. There is no standardized contrast usage protocol worldwide. The aim of this study was to establish an easy to use, cheap, and efficient protocol to estimate a personalized safe CM dose limit for every patient based on their kidney function. These limits are announced during the "Time Out" before the procedure. Our study included 519 patients undergoing interventional coronary procedures: 207 patients into the "Optimal Contrast Volume" arm and 312 into the control group. Applying the protocol into a daily clinical practice leads to a significant reduction in CM volume used for all type of procedures and the development of CIN in comparison with a control group.

Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial.

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) based on invasive coronary angiographic images. Calculating QFR is less invasive than measuring FFR and may be associated with lower costs. Current evidence supports the call for an adequately powered randomised comparison of QFR and FFR for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. The aim of the FAVOR III Europe Japan trial is to investigate if a QFR-based diagnostic strategy yields a non-inferior 12-month clinical outcome compared with a standard FFR-guided strategy in the evaluation of patients with intermediary coronary stenosis. FAVOR III Europe Japan is an investigator-initiated, randomised, clinical outcome, non-inferiority trial scheduled to randomise 2,000 patients with either 1) stable angina pectoris and intermediate coronary stenosis, or 2) indications for functional assessment of at least 1 non-culprit lesion after acute myocardial infarction. Up to 40 international centres will randomise patients to either a QFR-based or a standard FFR-based diagnostic strategy. The primary endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events is a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any unplanned coronary revascularisation at 12 months. QFR could emerge as an adenosine- and wire-free alternative to FFR, making the functional evaluation of intermediary coronary stenosis less invasive and more cost-effective.

Fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio, and instantaneous wave-free ratio: a comparison of the procedure-related dose of ionising radiation.

INTRODUCTION: The development of interventional cardiology increases the number of invasive procedures which are inevitably associated with increased exposure to ionizing radiation and associated risks. A percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) substantiated by evaluation of the coronary artery lesion's functional significance is recommended by both European and American cardiologists. Nevertheless, the prevalence of physiology-guided PCIs does not exceed 10% all over the globe. AIM: To identify the physiology evaluation method which is associated with the lowest exposure to ionising radiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Anonymised data of 421 patients with stable angina pectoris for whom elective coronary artery angiography followed by physiological assessment of intermediate coronary artery stenosis was performed were prospectively included in this study. Only diagnostic-procedure-related data of dose of ionizing radiation were analysed. Physiological assessment of coronary artery lesions was performed by fractional flow reserve (FFR), quantitative flow ratio (QFR), or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). RESULTS: Compared to FFR as a reference, fluoroscopy time (FT) was almost half in QFR and almost double in iFR, p < 0.001. QFR was associated with more than 3 times shorter FT compared to iFR. The dose area product was 663.87 ±260.51 cGy/cm2 (p = 0.03) lower in QFR compared to iFR. CONCLUSIONS: QFR is associated with significantly reduced exposure to ionising radiation compared to both FFR and iFR. Therefore, wider QFR application in clinical practice could eliminate any additional exposure to ionising radiation and increase the prevalence of physiology-guided coronary artery revascularization.

Outcomes of in-hospital treatment of cardiac patients who survived cardiac arrest and experienced coronary angiography.

INTRODUCTION: As coronary artery disease is the most frequent cause of cardiac arrest, early invasive strategies may be beneficial for such patients. This study analyses the impact of in-hospital treatment on short-term outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit of our hospital within 2-year period were prospectively included in the study. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients were included in the study, which showed that in-hospital mortality increases uniformly with the severity of the coronary artery lesion (p = 0.044), but an effect of revascularization on number of deaths was not observed (p = 0.64). The presence of coma (p = 0.005) and the combination of male sex and age above 60-year as 2.2-fold (p = 0.048) increasing in-hospital mortality were found. The highest mortality rate occurred during the first 3 days and the death rate of the patients who survived this period is low. We found reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (OR = 6.54; 95% CI: 1.98-21.63; p = 0.002), non-ventricular fibrillation initial rhythm (OR = 2.94; 95% CI: 1.25-6.90; p = 0.014), unconscious at admission (OR = 6.46; 95% CI: 1.96-21.24; p = 0.002) and post-resuscitation coma (OR = 6.00; 95% CI: 2.63-13.66; p < 0.001) or encephalopathy (OR = 2.71; 95% CI: 1.9-6.72; p = 0.031) to be significant prognostic factors for higher in-hospital mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend immediate coronary interventions for all survivors of OHCA regardless of their state of consciousness and absence of ischaemic changes on ECG. Early intensive treatment for OHCA patients is indispensable, as the highest mortality rate is within the first 3 days after an event.