Safety of infusing rituximab at a more rapid rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the RATE-RA study.

BACKGROUND: As recommended in the current prescribing information, rituximab infusions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) take 4.25 hours for the first infusion and 3.25 hours for subsequent infusions, which is a burden on patients and the health care system. We therefore evaluated the safety of infusing rituximab at a faster rate for an infusion period of 2 hours in patients with RA. METHODS: Patients with an inadequate response to anti-TNF who were rituximab-naive or -experienced received 2 courses of rituximab: Infusion 1 (Day 1) was administered over the standard 4.25 hours, and Infusions 2 (Day 15), 3 (Day 168) and 4 (Day 182) were administered over a faster 2-hour period. The primary endpoint was incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) associated with Infusion 2. RESULTS: Of the 351 patients enrolled, 87% and 13% were rituximab-naive and -experienced, respectively. The incidence (95% CI) of IRRs associated with Infusion 1 was 16.2% (12.5%, 20.5%) and consistent with weighted historical incidence of 20.7% (19.4%, 22.1%). The incidence (95% CI) of IRRs associated with Infusions 2, 3, and 4 compared with respective weighted historical incidences at the standard infusion rate was 6.5% (4.1%, 9.7%) vs 8.1% (7.2%, 9.1%); 5.9% (3.5%, 9.3%) vs 11.5% (10.3%, 12.8%); and 0.7 (0.1%, 2.6%) vs 5.0% (4.2%, 6.0%), respectively. All IRRs were grade 1 or 2, except for 3 grade 3 IRRs associated with Infusion 1 and 2 grade 3 IRRs associated with Infusion 2. Four patients experienced a total of 5 grade 3 IRRs; 3 of these patients continued on to received subsequent infusions at the faster rate. There were no serious IRRs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that rituximab can be administered at the faster infusion rate at the second and subsequent infusions without increasing the rate or severity of IRRs.

Durability of Response to Tocilizumab Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the US-Based Corrona Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Understanding the durability of response to treatment and factors associated with failure to maintain response in a real-world setting can inform treatment decisions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this study was to analyze durability of response to tocilizumab (TCZ) and factors associated with durability among US patients with RA in routine clinical practice. METHODS: TCZ initiators in the Corrona RA Registry were included. Durability of response was defined as maintaining continuous TCZ treatment and either an improvement of at least minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score or low disease activity (LDA). Secondary analyses included patients treated with intravenous (IV) TCZ and excluded those who discontinued TCZ without reporting reasons for discontinuation. Durability was calculated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cox proportional hazards modeling identified factors associated with durability. RESULTS: Among 1789 TCZ initiators, 466, 272, and 162 were persistent (with or without durable response) with follow-up visits at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Median MCID durability of response in CDAI was > 50% after 36 months overall, 26 months for TCZ-IV, and > 50% after 36 months for those with known reasons for discontinuation; longer durability was associated with increased duration of RA and higher baseline CDAI score and shorter durability with history of malignancy and history of diabetes. Median LDA durability of response was 13.0 months overall, for TCZ-IV, and for those with known reasons for discontinuation; shorter durability was associated with history of malignancy, history of diabetes, and higher baseline CDAI score. CONCLUSIONS: Median durability of response to TCZ in RA was > 3 years when defined as maintenance of MCID in CDAI score and > 1 year with the more stringent criteria of maintenance of LDA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01402661.

Methotrexate Discontinuation and Dose Decreases After Therapy With Tocilizumab: Results From the Corrona Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Similar outcomes have been observed between patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) responding to tocilizumab (TCZ) with methotrexate (MTX) who discontinued vs. continued MTX and between patients receiving MTX who added TCZ vs. switched to TCZ monotherapy. This study examined MTX discontinuation and dose decreases in patients with RA initiating TCZ in a real-world setting. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients enrolled in the Corrona RA registry who initiated TCZ in combination with MTX and had a 6-month follow-up visit without TCZ discontinuation were included. Patients were grouped by MTX dose at the time of TCZ initiation (≤ 10 mg, > 10 to ≤ 15 mg, > 15 to ≤ 20 mg, > 20 mg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with changes in MTX use at 6 months, with a secondary analysis at 12 months. Changes in disease activity [Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)] and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 6 and 12 months were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: Of 444 included patients, 82.7% were female and 83.7% white, with mean (SD) disease duration of 11.6 (9.3) years, baseline CDAI score of 24.0 (15.4), and baseline MTX dose of 17.7 (5.8) mg. At 6 months, 139 patients (31.3%) discontinued or decreased their MTX dose. All MTX dose groups and patients who discontinued, decreased, maintained, or increased their MTX dose displayed improvements in CDAI scores and PROs at 6 months. Similar patterns and results were observed at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of patients initiating TCZ discontinued or decreased their MTX dose after TCZ initiation. Improvements in disease activity and functionality were observed in patients who decreased or stopped MTX. This real-world study confirmed prior observations that discontinuing or decreasing MTX may be a treatment strategy for patients initiating TCZ combination therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01402661.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long-term disease that causes joint swelling, stiffness, and pain. Unless RA is treated quickly, patients can experience joint damage and disability. Patients with RA often take methotrexate (MTX) as their first treatment, but many patients do not have sufficient improvement with MTX alone. For these patients, doctors often add another medicine called a biologic to their existing treatment. However, taking more medications is associated with toxic effects and can make it harder for patients to stay on their therapy.Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a biologic that is used to treat RA. In one clinical trial, reported by Kremer et al., patients whose RA improved when they were taking TCZ plus MTX were subsequently able to stop taking MTX and their RA remained well controlled (Arthritis Rheumatol 70(8):1200­1218, 2018). However, researchers had not looked at whether patients outside of a clinical trial (in the "real world") can stop taking MTX or take less MTX after they start taking TCZ. This study used real-world data to examine if patients who start taking TCZ subsequently stop taking or take less MTX.This study showed that many patients were able to stop taking or take less MTX during the year after they started taking TCZ. Patients who stopped or decreased their MTX dose had less-active RA and reported that they felt better and had fewer symptoms. These results suggest that it is common for patients in the real world to stop taking or take less MTX after they start taking TCZ.

Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Is Unaffected by Comorbidity Burden or Obesity: Data from a US Registry.

OBJECTIVE: Comorbidity burden and obesity may affect treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Few real-world studies have evaluated the effect of comorbidity burden or obesity on the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ). This study evaluated TCZ effectiveness in treating RA patients with high versus low comorbidity burden and obesity versus nonobesity in US clinical practice. METHODS: Patients in the Corrona RA registry who initiated TCZ were stratified by low or high comorbidity burden using a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI) and by obese or nonobese status using body mass index (BMI). Improvements in disease activity and functionality after TCZ initiation were compared for the above strata of patients at 6 and 12 months after adjusting for statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: We identified patients with high (mCCI ≥ 2; n = 195) and low (mCCI < 2; n = 575) comorbidity burden and patients categorized as obese (BMI ≥ 30; n = 356) and nonobese (BMI < 30; n = 449) who were treated with TCZ. Most patients (> 95%) were biologic experienced and about one-third of patients received TCZ as monotherapy, with no significant differences between patients by comorbidity burden or obesity status. Improvement in disease activity and functionality at 6 and 12 months was similar between groups, regardless of comorbidity burden or obesity status. CONCLUSION: In this real-world analysis, TCZ was frequently used to treat patients with high comorbidity burden or obesity. Effectiveness of TCZ did not differ by comorbidity or obesity status.

Patterns of Prednisone Use in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Initiating Treatment with Tocilizumab in Routine US Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Prednisone is frequently administered in combination with other therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA); however, its chronic use is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities and mortality. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate changes in prednisone use among patients with RA treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) in routine US clinical practice. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients in the Corrona RA registry who initiated TCZ were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with changes in prednisone use over 12 months (primary analysis) and 6 months (secondary analysis). Changes in disease activity over 6 and 12 months (± 3 months) were assessed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Outcomes were assessed in the overall population and separately for patients receiving TCZ monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. RESULTS: Of patients receiving prednisone at baseline (mean [SD] dose: 7.7 [5.2] mg/day), 30.6% discontinued prednisone over 12 months; among patients receiving > 7.5 mg of prednisone at the time of TCZ initiation, 63.0% discontinued prednisone or decreased their dose by ≥ 5 mg over 12 months. In secondary analyses, 29.7% of patients receiving prednisone at baseline had discontinued prednisone over 6 months; among those receiving > 7.5 mg of prednisone at baseline, 51.3% discontinued or decreased their dose by ≥ 5 mg over 6 months. Changes in prednisone use and improvement from baseline in CDAI score over 6 and 12 months were comparable between patients who initiated TCZ monotherapy vs. TCZ combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis, many patients initiating TCZ monotherapy or combination therapy were able to discontinue or decrease their prednisone dose over 12 months. Similar changes in prednisone dose were observed over 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01402661. FUNDING: Corrona, LLC and Genentech, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can lead to joint damage and disability. The steroid prednisone is a fast-acting and effective treatment for RA and is often prescribed alongside disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The health risks associated with the long-term use of prednisone have led to recommendations to minimize prednisone dose and duration of treatment. Few studies have examined the extent to which biologic DMARDs allow rheumatologists to reduce or discontinue the use of prednisone. The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in prednisone dose while receiving tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with RA seen in routine US clinical practice. Patients who were enrolled in the Corrona RA registry and were beginning treatment with TCZ were included. Changes in prednisone use were evaluated 12 months after starting treatment. Of patients receiving prednisone at study initiation, 30.6% had discontinued prednisone over 12 months; among patients receiving > 7.5 mg of prednisone at the time of TCZ initiation, 63.0% discontinued prednisone or decreased the dose by ≥ 5 mg over 12 months. In secondary analyses, 29.7% of patients receiving prednisone at study initiation had discontinued prednisone over 6 months; among those receiving > 7.5 mg of prednisone at baseline, 51.3% discontinued or decreased the dose by ≥ 5 mg over 6 months. Changes in prednisone use and improvement in disease activity over 6 and 12 months were comparable between patients who initiated TCZ monotherapy or combination therapy with other DMARDs.

Real-world Comparative Effectiveness of Tocilizumab Monotherapy vs. Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors with Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Controlled clinical studies have shown that the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy is superior to that of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) monotherapy and comparable to that of TCZ plus methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study compared the real-world effectiveness of TCZ monotherapy vs. TNFis plus MTX in US patients with RA. METHODS: TCZ-naïve patients from the Corrona RA registry with prior exposure to ≥ 1 TNFi who initiated TCZ monotherapy or TNFi + MTX were included. Outcomes included mean change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), achievement of low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10), achievement of modified American College of Rheumatology (mACR) 20/50 responses, and mean change in modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at 6 months. Patients initiating TNFi + MTX were grouped by MTX dose (≤ 10 mg; > 10 to ≤ 15 mg; > 15 to ≤ 20 mg; > 20 mg); outcomes in each group were compared with TCZ monotherapy using trimmed populations (excluding patients outside the propensity score distribution overlap). RESULTS: Patients in all groups experienced improvement in CDAI at 6 months (mean change, - 6.9 to - 9.7), with no significant differences between the TCZ monotherapy and TNFi + MTX groups. Achievement of LDA and mACR responses at 6 months were comparable between the TCZ monotherapy and TNFi + MTX groups; overall, 26.8-38.0% of patients achieved LDA, 24.3-37.6% achieved mACR20 response and 13.2-20.8% achieved mACR50 response. The mean change in mHAQ at 6 months was - 0.1 in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world population of US patients with RA who had prior TNFi exposure, there was no evidence of a difference in the effectiveness of TCZ monotherapy compared with that of TNFi + MTX, regardless of MTX dose, at 6 months for improving RA disease activity. FUNDING: Corrona, LLC. Plain language summary available for this article.

Impact of Tocilizumab Monotherapy on Clinical and Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy has been proven as an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical trials. However, there are limited data available regarding the effectiveness of TCZ monotherapy in real-world clinical settings in the United States. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of TCZ monotherapy on disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a US-based observational cohort of patients with RA seen in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Eligible patients had active RA, no prior use of TCZ, and initiated TCZ as monotherapy. Changes in disease activity and PROs were assessed 1 year after TCZ initiation for the overall cohort and stratified by number of prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis; 0, 1, or ≥2). Primary outcomes were change in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); change in patient global disease activity, pain, fatigue; and the proportions of patients with improvement in modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), morning stiffness, and EQ-5D. RESULTS: Of 255 eligible TCZ monotherapy initiators, 9.4% were TNFi naive, 36.5% had one prior TNFi, and 54.1% had ≥2 prior TNFis. Clinical and PRO measures indicated that patients were substantially impacted by their disease at baseline. The median decrease in CDAI from baseline to 1 year was 9.8 and median patient global and pain scores improved by 10 mm, indicative of clinically meaningful improvement; the median fatigue score improved by 5 mm. Approximately 26% of patients reported clinically meaningful improvement in mHAQ, 54% experienced improvement in morning stiffness, and 20% to 36% experienced improvement in EQ-5D domains (walking, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Improvements were similar across TNFi groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with active, refractory RA who initiated TCZ monotherapy experienced improvements in both composite disease activity scores and PROs at 1 year, regardless of prior TNFi exposure. FUNDING: Corrona, LLC and Genentech.

Impact of rituximab on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the US Corrona Registry.

To evaluate the impact of rituximab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in a US-based observational cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with active RA, prior exposure to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) and who newly initiated rituximab were identified. Changes in PROs were assessed 1 year after rituximab initiation. PRO measures included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI); patient global disease activity, pain and fatigue (visual analog score; 0-100); morning stiffness (hours); modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ; 0-3); and EuroQoL EQ-5D. Of the 667 patients who newly initiated rituximab, baseline PRO and clinical measures indicated that patients were substantially impacted by their RA disease and quality of life; 54% of patients had high disease activity. One year after rituximab initiation, 49.0, 47.1, 49.8, and 23.2% of patients reported clinically meaningful improvements in patient global, pain, fatigue, and mHAQ, respectively. Morning stiffness and EuroQol EQ-5D domains improved in 48 and 19-32% of patients, respectively. These real-world registry data demonstrated that patients with long-standing, refractory RA experienced improvements in PROs 1 year after initiating rituximab.

Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Data indicate that cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitors cause less gastroduodenal mucosal damage than nonspecific NSAIDS, but their effects on the small bowel mucosa are less well recognized. In a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with video capsule endoscopy (VCE) we prospectively evaluated the incidence of small bowel injury in healthy subjects treated with celecoxib compared to naproxen plus omeprazole. METHODS: We randomly assigned subjects with normal baseline VCEs to celecoxib 200 mg twice daily (n = 120), naproxen 500 mg twice daily plus omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 118), or placebo (n = 118) for 2 weeks. The primary end point was the mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject. RESULTS: Baseline VCE found small bowel lesions in 13.8% (57/413) of screened subjects, who became ineligible for randomization. The mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks per subject and the percentage of subjects with these mucosal breaks were 2.99 +/- 0.51, 55% for naproxen/omeprazole compared to 0.32 +/- 0.10, 16% for celecoxib and 0.11 +/- 0.04, 7% for placebo (P < .001, both comparisons). The magnitude of the difference between celecoxib and placebo was small but statistically significant (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy subjects with lesion-free baseline VCEs, celecoxib was associated with significantly fewer small bowel mucosal breaks than naproxen plus omeprazole. This study also showed that the background incidence of small bowel lesions in healthy adults is not insignificant and should be considered in future trials with VCE.