Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 48
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Infect Dis ; 229(4): 1097-1106, 2024 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37596838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In July 2022, New York State (NYS) reported a case of paralytic polio in an unvaccinated young adult, and subsequent wastewater surveillance confirmed sustained local transmission of type 2 vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV2) in NYS with genetic linkage to the paralyzed patient. METHODS: We adapted an established poliovirus transmission and oral poliovirus vaccine evolution model to characterize dynamics of poliovirus transmission in NYS, including consideration of the immunization activities performed as part of the declared state of emergency. RESULTS: Despite sustained transmission of imported VDPV2 in NYS involving potentially thousands of individuals (depending on seasonality, population structure, and mixing assumptions) in 2022, the expected number of additional paralytic cases in years 2023 and beyond is small (less than 0.5). However, continued transmission and/or reintroduction of poliovirus into NYS and other populations remains a possible risk in communities that do not achieve and maintain high immunization coverage. CONCLUSIONS: In countries such as the United States that use only inactivated poliovirus vaccine, even with high average immunization coverage, imported polioviruses may circulate and pose a small but nonzero risk of causing paralysis in nonimmune individuals.


Asunto(s)
Poliomielitis , Poliovirus , Humanos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , New York/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Poliovirus/genética , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Vacuna Antipolio Oral , Monitoreo Epidemiológico Basado en Aguas Residuales
2.
J Infect Dis ; 227(4): 533-542, 2023 02 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36626187

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine effectiveness among persons with prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: We evaluated the effect against incident SARS-CoV-2 infection of (1) prior infection without vaccination, (2) vaccination (2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) without prior infection, and (3) vaccination after prior infection, all compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection. We included long-term care facility staff in New York City aged <65 years with weekly SARS-CoV-2 testing from 21 January to 5 June 2021. Test results were obtained from state-mandated laboratory reporting. Vaccination status was obtained from the Citywide Immunization Registry. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounding with inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Compared with unvaccinated persons without prior infection, incident SARS-CoV-2 infection risk was lower in all groups: 54.6% (95% confidence interval, 38.0%-66.8%) lower among unvaccinated, previously infected persons; 80.0% (67.6%-87.7%) lower among fully vaccinated persons without prior infection; and 82.4% (70.8%-89.3%) lower among persons fully vaccinated after prior infection. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by ≥80% and, for those with prior infection, increased protection from prior infection alone. These findings support recommendations that all eligible persons, regardless of prior infection, be vaccinated against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacuna BNT162 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Casas de Salud
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e469-e476, 2023 02 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35594552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Belief that vaccination is not needed for individuals with prior infection contributes to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine hesitancy. Among individuals infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) before vaccines became available, we determined whether vaccinated individuals had reduced odds of reinfection. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study among adult New York City residents who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2020 and had not died or tested positive again >90 days after an initial positive test as of 1 July 2021. Case patients with reinfection during July 2021-November 2021 and controls with no reinfection were matched (1:3) on age, sex, timing of initial positive test in 2020, and neighborhood poverty level. Matched odds ratios (mORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 349 827 eligible adults, 2583 were reinfected during July 2021-November 2021. Of 2401 with complete matching criteria data, 1102 (45.9%) were known to be symptomatic for COVID-19-like illness, and 96 (4.0%) were hospitalized. Unvaccinated individuals, compared with individuals fully vaccinated within the prior 90 days, had elevated odds of reinfection (mOR, 3.21; 95% CI, 2.70 to 3.82), of symptomatic reinfection (mOR, 2.97; 95% CI, 2.31 to 3.83), and of reinfection with hospitalization (mOR, 2.09; 95% CI, .91 to 4.79). CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination reduced odds of reinfections when the Delta variant predominated. Further studies should assess risk of severe outcomes among reinfected persons as new variants emerge, infection- and vaccine-induced immunity wanes, and booster doses are administered.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Vacunación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Reinfección
4.
N Engl J Med ; 382(11): 1009-1017, 2020 03 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32160662

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Measles was declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, but the risk of outbreaks owing to international importations remains. An outbreak of measles in New York City began when one unvaccinated child returned home from Israel with measles; onset of rash occurred on September 30, 2018, 9 days after the child returned home. METHODS: We investigated suspected cases of measles by conducting interviews, reviewing medical and immunization records, identifying exposed persons, and performing diagnostic testing. Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine (given as either MMR or measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine and collectively referred to as MMR vaccine) uptake was monitored with the use of the Citywide Immunization Registry. The total direct cost to the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 649 cases of measles were confirmed, with onsets of rash occurring between September 30, 2018, and July 15, 2019. A majority of the patients (93.4%) were part of the Orthodox Jewish community, and 473 of the patients (72.9%) resided in the Williamsburg area of Brooklyn, New York. The median age was 3 years; 81.2% of the patients were 18 years of age or younger, and 85.8% of the patients with a known vaccination history were unvaccinated. Serious complications included pneumonia (in 37 patients [5.7%]) and hospitalization (in 49 patients [7.6%]); among the patients who were hospitalized, 20 (40.8%) were admitted to an intensive care unit. As a result of efforts to promote vaccination, the percentage of children in Williamsburg who received at least one dose of MMR vaccine increased from 79.5% to 91.1% among children 12 to 59 months of age. As of September 9, 2019, a total of 559 staff members at the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (7% of the agency) had been involved in the measles response. The cost of the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene response was $8.4 million. CONCLUSIONS: Importation of measles and vaccination delays among young children led to an outbreak of measles in New York City. The outbreak response was resource intensive and caused serious illness, particularly among unvaccinated children.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola , Sarampión , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(3): 416-424, 2022 08 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34849648

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Measles elimination (interruption of endemic measles virus transmission) in the United States was declared in 2000; however, the number of cases and outbreaks have increased in recent years. We characterized the epidemiology of measles outbreaks and measles transmission patterns after elimination to identify potential gaps in the US measles control program. METHODS: We analyzed national measles notification data from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2019. We defined measles infection clusters as single cases (isolated cases not linked to additional cases), 2-case clusters, or outbreaks with ≥3 linked cases. We calculated the effective reproduction number (R) to assess changes in transmissibility and reviewed molecular epidemiology data. RESULTS: During 2001-2019, a total of 3873 measles cases, including 747 international importations, were reported in the United States; 29% of importations were associated with outbreaks. Among 871 clusters, 69% were single cases and 72% had no spread. Larger and longer clusters were reported since 2013, including 7 outbreaks with >50 cases lasting >2 months, 5 of which occurred in known underimmunized, close-knit communities. No measles lineage circulated in a single transmission chain for >12 months. Higher estimates of R were noted in recent years, although R remained below the epidemic threshold of 1. CONCLUSIONS: Current epidemiology continues to support the interruption of endemic measles virus transmission in the United States. However, larger and longer outbreaks in recent postelimination years and emerging trends of increased transmission in underimmunized communities emphasize the need for targeted approaches to close existing immunity gaps and maintain measles elimination.


Asunto(s)
Epidemias , Sarampión , Número Básico de Reproducción , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna Antisarampión , Virus del Sarampión/genética , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación
6.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 71(44): 1418-1424, 2022 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36327157

RESUMEN

In July 2022, a case of paralytic poliomyelitis resulting from infection with vaccine-derived poliovirus (VDPV) type 2 (VDPV2)§ was confirmed in an unvaccinated adult resident of Rockland County, New York (1). As of August 10, 2022, poliovirus type 2 (PV2)¶ genetically linked to this VDPV2 had been detected in wastewater** in Rockland County and neighboring Orange County (1). This report describes the results of additional poliovirus testing of wastewater samples collected during March 9-October 11, 2022, and tested as of October 20, 2022, from 48 sewersheds (the community area served by a wastewater collection system) serving parts of Rockland County and 12 surrounding counties. Among 1,076 wastewater samples collected, 89 (8.3%) from 10 sewersheds tested positive for PV2. As part of a broad epidemiologic investigation, wastewater testing can provide information about where poliovirus might be circulating in a community in which a paralytic case has been identified; however, the most important public health actions for preventing paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States remain ongoing case detection through national acute flaccid myelitis (AFM) surveillance†† and improving vaccination coverage in undervaccinated communities. Although most persons in the United States are sufficiently immunized, unvaccinated or undervaccinated persons living or working in Kings, Orange, Queens, Rockland, or Sullivan counties, New York should complete the polio vaccination series as soon as possible.


Asunto(s)
Poliomielitis , Vacuna Antipolio Oral , Poliovirus , Adulto , Humanos , New York/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/diagnóstico , Poliomielitis/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Poliovirus/genética , Vacuna Antipolio Oral/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Aguas Residuales
7.
Clin Microbiol Rev ; 33(2)2020 03 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32102901

RESUMEN

Mumps is an acute viral infection characterized by inflammation of the parotid and other salivary glands. Persons with mumps are infectious from 2 days before through 5 days after parotitis onset, and transmission is through respiratory droplets. Despite the success of mumps vaccination programs in the United States and parts of Europe, a recent increase in outbreaks of mumps virus infections among fully vaccinated populations has been reported. Although the effectiveness of the mumps virus component of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is suboptimal, a range of contributing factors has led to these outbreaks occurring in high-vaccination-coverage settings, including the intensity of exposure, the possibility of vaccine strain mismatch, delayed implementation of control measures due to the timeliness of reporting, a lack of use of appropriate laboratory tests (such as reverse transcription-PCR), and time since last vaccination. The resurgence of mumps virus infections among previously vaccinated individuals over the past decade has prompted discussions about new strategies to mitigate the risk of future outbreaks. The decision to implement a third dose of the MMR vaccine in response to an outbreak should be considered in discussions with local public health agencies. Traditional public health measures, including the isolation of infectious persons, timely contact tracing, and effective communication and awareness education for the public and medical community, should remain key interventions for outbreak control. Maintaining high mumps vaccination coverage remains key to U.S. and global efforts to reduce disease incidence and rates of complications.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Paperas/epidemiología , Paperas/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Cobertura de Vacunación
9.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(40): 893-896, 2019 Oct 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600181

RESUMEN

During January 1-October 1, 2019, a total of 1,249 measles cases and 22 measles outbreaks were reported in the United States. This represents the most U.S. cases reported in a single year since 1992 (1), and the second highest number of reported outbreaks annually since measles was declared eliminated* in the United States in 2000 (2). Measles is an acute febrile rash illness with an attack rate of approximately 90% in susceptible household contacts (3). Domestic outbreaks can occur when travelers contract measles outside the United States and subsequently transmit infection to unvaccinated persons they expose in the United States. Among the 1,249 measles cases reported in 2019, 1,163 (93%) were associated with the 22 outbreaks, 1,107 (89%) were in patients who were unvaccinated or had an unknown vaccination status, and 119 (10%) measles patients were hospitalized. Closely related outbreaks in New York City (NYC) and New York State (NYS; excluding NYC), with ongoing transmission for nearly 1 year in large and close-knit Orthodox Jewish communities, accounted for 934 (75%) cases during 2019 and threatened the elimination status of measles in the United States. Robust responses in NYC and NYS were effective in controlling transmission before the 1-year mark; however, continued vigilance for additional cases within these communities is essential to determine whether elimination has been sustained. Collaboration between public health authorities and undervaccinated communities is important for preventing outbreaks and limiting transmission. The combination of maintenance of high national vaccination coverage with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) and rapid implementation of measles control measures remains the cornerstone for preventing widespread measles transmission (4).


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Sarampión/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Sarampión/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(11): 1843-1847, 2017 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29028959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) or immune globulin (IG) are routinely used for measles post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). However, current literature on the effectiveness of measles PEP is limited and variable. Here, we examined the effectiveness of MMR and IG PEP among children exposed to measles during an outbreak in New York City (NYC) in 2013. METHODS: Contacts were identified by the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene between 13 March 2013 and 30 June 2013. Immunity to measles and receipt of PEP was determined for contacts. PEP effectiveness [(1 - relative risk of developing measles) × 100] was calculated for MMR, IG, and any PEP (MMR or IG) for nonimmune contacts aged <19 years. RESULTS: A total of 3409 contacts were identified, of which 208 (6.1%), 274 (8.0%), and 318 (9.3%) met the inclusion criteria for analysis of MMR, IG, and any PEP effectiveness, respectively. Of the contacts included, 44 received MMR PEP and 77 received IG PEP. Effectiveness of MMR PEP was 83.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.4%, 95.8%). No contact who received IG PEP developed measles; effectiveness of IG PEP was 100% (approximated 95% CI, 56.2%, 99.8%). Effectiveness of receiving any PEP (MMR or IG) was 92.9% (95% CI, 56.2%, 99.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Contacts who received PEP were less likely to develop disease. Our findings support current recommendations for administration of PEP following exposure to measles. These results highlight the importance of a rapid public health outbreak response to limit measles transmission following case identification.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Profilaxis Posexposición , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administración & dosificación , Lactante , Masculino , Sarampión/inmunología , Sarampión/transmisión , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Riesgo , Vacunación
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(4): 408-412, 2017 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927872

RESUMEN

Background: On 14 January 2014, a vaccinated student presented with parotitis. Mumps immunoglobulin M (IgM) testing was negative and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing was not performed, resulting in a missed diagnosis and the start of an outbreak at a New York City (NYC) university. Methods: Mumps case investigations included patient interviews, medical records review, and laboratory testing including mumps serology and RT-PCR. Case patients were considered linked to the outbreak if they attended or had epidemiologic linkage to the university. Epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory data for outbreak cases residing in NYC were analyzed. Results: Fifty-six NYC residents with mumps were identified with onset between 12 January and 30 April 2014. Fifty-three cases (95%) were university students, 1 (2%) was a staff member, and 2 (4%) had epidemiologic links to the university. The median age was 20 years (range 18-37 years). All cases had parotitis. Three cases were hospitalized, including 1 of 2 cases with orchitis. Fifty-four (96%) cases had received ≥1 mumps-containing vaccine, 1 (2%) was unvaccinated due to religious exemption, and 1 (2%) had unknown vaccination status. Two of the 44 (5%) cases tested by serology were mumps IgM positive, and 27 of the 40 (68%) tested by RT-PCR were positive. Conclusions: Mumps outbreaks can occur in highly vaccinated populations. Mumps should be considered in patients with parotitis regardless of vaccination status. RT-PCR is the preferred testing method; providers should not rely on IgM testing alone. High vaccination coverage and control measures likely limited the extent of the outbreak.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Paperas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , ARN Viral/sangre , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Universidades , Adulto Joven
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(6): 1020-1025, 2017 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28903503

RESUMEN

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes lower respiratory tract illness frequently. No effective antivirals or vaccines for RSV are approved for use in the United States; however, there are at least 50 vaccines and monoclonal antibody products in development, with those targeting older adults and pregnant women (to protect young infants) in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Unanswered questions regarding RSV epidemiology need to be identified and addressed prior to RSV vaccine introduction to guide the measurement of impact and future recommendations. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) convened a technical consultation to gather input from external subject matter experts on their individual perspectives regarding evidence gaps in current RSV epidemiology in the United States, potential studies and surveillance platforms needed to fill these gaps, and prioritizing efforts. Participants articulated their individual views, and CDC staff synthesized individuals' input into this report.


Asunto(s)
Vigilancia de la Población , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/mortalidad , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 23(6): 571-576, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166179

RESUMEN

During 2013, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) received reports of 6 hepatitis A cases among food handlers. We describe our decision-making process for public notification, type of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) offered, and lessons learned. For 3 cases, public notification was issued and DOHMH offered only hepatitis A vaccine as PEP. Subsequent outbreaks resulted from 1 case for which no public notification was issued or PEP offered, and 1 for which public notification was issued and PEP was offered too late. DOHMH continues to use environmental assessments to guide public notification decisions and offer only hepatitis A vaccine as PEP after public notification but recognizes the need to evaluate each situation individually. The PEP strategy employed by DOHMH should be considered because hepatitis A vaccine is immunogenic in all age groups, can be obtained by local jurisdictions more quickly, and is logistically easier to administer in mass clinics than immunoglobulin.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Servicios de Alimentación , Hepatitis A/epidemiología , Salud Pública/métodos , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Servicios de Alimentación/normas , Hepatitis A/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas contra la Hepatitis A/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Gobierno Local , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Profilaxis Posexposición , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos
14.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(8): 1379-86, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26197087

RESUMEN

In September 2012, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene identified an outbreak of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup C invasive meningococcal disease among men who have sex with men (MSM). Twenty-two case-patients and 7 deaths were identified during August 2010-February 2013. During this period, 7 cases in non-MSM were diagnosed. The slow-moving outbreak was linked to the use of websites and mobile phone applications that connect men with male sexual partners, which complicated the epidemiologic investigation and prevention efforts. We describe the outbreak and steps taken to interrupt transmission, including an innovative and wide-ranging outreach campaign that involved direct, internet-based, and media-based communications; free vaccination events; and engagement of community and government partners. We conclude by discussing the challenges of managing an outbreak affecting a discrete community of MSM and the benefits of using social networking technology to reach this at-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Homosexualidad Masculina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones Meningocócicas/epidemiología , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo C/patogenicidad , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Sexual/estadística & datos numéricos , Parejas Sexuales , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones Meningocócicas/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo C/genética , Neisseria meningitidis Serogrupo C/inmunología , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología
16.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(9): 1205-10, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Measles was eliminated in the United States through high vaccination coverage and a public health system able to rapidly respond to measles. Measles may occur among vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented. METHODS: Suspected patients and contacts exposed during a measles outbreak in New York City in 2011 were investigated. Medical histories and immunization records were obtained. Cases were confirmed by detection of measles-specific immunoglobulin M and/or RNA. Tests for measles immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG avidity, measurement of measles neutralizing antibody titers, and genotyping were performed to characterize the cases. RESULTS: The index patient had 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine; of 88 contacts, 4 secondary patients were confirmed who had either 2 doses of measles-containing vaccine or a past positive measles IgG antibody. All patients had laboratory confirmation of measles infection, clinical symptoms consistent with measles, and high-avidity IgG antibody characteristic of a secondary immune response. Neutralizing antibody titers of secondary patients reached >80 000 mIU/mL 3-4 days after rash onset and that of the index was <500 mIU/mL 9 days after rash onset. No additional cases of measles occurred among 231 contacts of secondary patients. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of measles transmission from a twice-vaccinated individual with documented secondary vaccine failure. The clinical presentation and laboratory data of the index patient were typical of measles in a naive individual. Secondary patients had robust anamnestic antibody responses. No tertiary cases occurred despite numerous contacts. This outbreak underscores the need for thorough epidemiologic and laboratory investigation of suspected cases of measles regardless of vaccination status.


Asunto(s)
Sarampión/transmisión , Vacunación , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Afinidad de Anticuerpos , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Sarampión/epidemiología , Sarampión/inmunología , Vacuna Antisarampión/administración & dosificación , Vacuna Antisarampión/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York
17.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 20(4): 525-31, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24656328

RESUMEN

In 2009, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene delivered influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (pH1N1) vaccine to health care providers, who were required to report all administered doses to the Citywide Immunization Registry. Using data from this registry and a provider survey, we estimated the number of all pH1N1 vaccine doses administered. Of 2.8 million doses distributed during October 1, 2009-March 4, 2010, a total of 988,298 doses were administered and reported; another 172,289 doses were administered but not reported, for a total of 1,160,587 doses administered during this period. Reported doses represented an estimated 80%-85% of actual doses administered. Reporting by a wide range of provider types was feasible during a pandemic. Pediatric-care providers had the highest reporting rate (93%). Other private-care providers who routinely did not report vaccinations indicated that they had few, if any, problems, thereby suggesting that mandatory reporting of all vaccines would be feasible.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Vacunación/métodos
18.
Am J Public Health ; 104(1): e45-9, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24228652

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We determined the success of the school-located vaccination (SLV) program, implemented in 2009 in New York City to deliver pandemic influenza A (H1N1) monovalent vaccine (pH1N1), versus provider offices in reaching children who had never previously received influenza vaccine. METHODS: We compared the immunization history of children vaccinated in school versus provider offices. We included records in the Citywide Immunization Registry with pH1N1 administered between October 2009 and March 2010 to elementary school-aged children. RESULTS: In total, 96,524 children received pH1N1 vaccine in schools, and 102,933 children received pH1N1 vaccine in provider offices. Of children vaccinated in schools, 34% had never received seasonal influenza vaccination in the past, compared with only 10% of children vaccinated at provider offices (P < .001). Children vaccinated in schools were more likely to have received a second dose of pH1N1 in 2009-2010 than those vaccinated in provider offices (80% vs 45%). CONCLUSIONS: The SLV program was more successful at reaching children who had never received influenza immunization in the past and should be considered as a strategy for delivering influenza vaccine in routine and emergency situations.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Inmunización/organización & administración , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud
20.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 186-195, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164695

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: New York State (NYS) reported a polio case (June 2022) and outbreak of imported type 2 circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV2) (last positive wastewater detection in February 2023), for which uncertainty remains about potential ongoing undetected transmission. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Extending a prior deterministic model, we apply an established stochastic modeling approach to characterize the confidence about no circulation (CNC) of cVDPV2 as a function of time since the last detected signal of transmission (i.e. poliovirus positive acute flaccid myelitis case or wastewater sample). RESULTS: With the surveillance coverage for the NYS population majority and its focus on outbreak counties, modeling suggests a high CNC (95%) within 3-10 months of the last positive surveillance signal, depending on surveillance sensitivity and population mixing patterns. Uncertainty about surveillance sensitivity implies longer durations required to achieve higher CNC. CONCLUSIONS: In populations that maintain high overall immunization coverage with inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), rare polio cases may occur in un(der)-vaccinated individuals. Modeling demonstrates the unlikeliness of type 2 outbreaks reestablishing endemic transmission or resulting in large absolute numbers of paralytic cases. Achieving and maintaining high immunization coverage with IPV remains the most effective measure to prevent outbreaks and shorten the duration of imported poliovirus transmission.


Asunto(s)
Poliomielitis , Poliovirus , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacuna Antipolio Oral , Aguas Residuales , Poliomielitis/epidemiología , Poliomielitis/prevención & control , Vacuna Antipolio de Virus Inactivados , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA