Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 81(4): 575-583, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607791

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses after BNT162b2 vaccination. METHODS: In this prospective study, disease activity and clinical assessments were recorded from the first dose of vaccine until day 15 after the second dose in 126 patients with SLE. SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses were measured against wild-type spike antigen, while serum-neutralising activity was assessed against the SARS-CoV-2 historical strain and variants of concerns (VOCs). Vaccine-specific T cell responses were quantified by interferon-γ release assay after the second dose. RESULTS: BNT162b2 was well tolerated and no statistically significant variations of BILAG (British Isles Lupus Assessment Group) and SLEDAI (SLE Disease Activity Index) scores were observed throughout the study in patients with SLE with active and inactive disease at baseline. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and methotrexate (MTX) treatments were associated with drastically reduced BNT162b2 antibody response (ß=-78, p=0.007; ß=-122, p<0.001, respectively). Anti-spike antibody response was positively associated with baseline total immunoglobulin G serum levels, naïve B cell frequencies (ß=2, p=0.018; ß=2.5, p=0.003) and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response (r=0.462, p=0.003). In responders, serum neutralisation activity decreased against VOCs bearing the E484K mutation but remained detectable in a majority of patients. CONCLUSION: MMF, MTX and poor baseline humoral immune status, particularly low naïve B cell frequencies, are independently associated with impaired BNT162b2 mRNA antibody response, delineating patients with SLE who might need adapted vaccine regimens and follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , Inmunidad Humoral/efectos de los fármacos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Antirreumáticos/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/efectos de los fármacos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/virología , Masculino , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Ácido Micofenólico/inmunología , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Front Immunol ; 13: 790334, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35222375

RESUMEN

The capacity of pre-existing immunity to human common coronaviruses (HCoV) to cross-protect against de novo COVID-19is yet unknown. In this work, we studied the sera of 175 COVID-19 patients, 76 healthy donors and 3 intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) batches. We found that most COVID-19 patients developed anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies before IgM. Moreover, the capacity of their IgGs to react to beta-HCoV, was present in the early sera of most patients before the appearance of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. This implied that a recall-type antibody response was generated. In comparison, the patients that mounted an anti-SARS-COV2 IgM response, prior to IgG responses had lower titres of anti-beta-HCoV IgG antibodies. This indicated that pre-existing immunity to beta-HCoV was conducive to the generation of memory type responses to SARS-COV-2. Finally, we also found that pre-COVID-19-era sera and IVIG cross-reacted with SARS-CoV-2 antigens without neutralising SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro. Put together, these results indicate that whilst pre-existing immunity to HCoV is responsible for recall-type IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2, it does not lead to cross-protection against COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/fisiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Resfriado Común/inmunología , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/metabolismo , Anticuerpos Antivirales/metabolismo , Antígenos Virales/inmunología , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Reacciones Cruzadas , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Heteróloga , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Inmunoglobulina M/metabolismo , Memoria Inmunológica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia
3.
J Immunol Methods ; 448: 34-43, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28527901

RESUMEN

Photonic ring resonance is a property of light where in certain circumstances specific wavelengths are trapped in a ring resonator. Sensors based on silicon photonic ring resonators function by detecting the interaction between light circulating inside the sensor and matter deposited on the sensor surface. Binding of biological material results in a localized change in refractive index on the sensor surface, which affects the circulating optical field extending beyond the sensor boundary. That is, the resonant wavelength will change when the refractive index of the medium around the ring resonator changes. Ring resonators can be fabricated onto small silicon chips, allowing development of a miniature multiplex array of ring based biosensors. This paper describes the properties of such a system when responding to the refractive index changed in a simple and precise way by changing the ionic strength of the surrounding media, and in a more useful way by the binding of macromolecules to the surface above the resonators. Specifically, a capture immunoassay is described that measures the change of resonant wavelength as a patient serum sample with anti-SS-A autoantibodies is flowed over a chip spotted with SS-A antigen and amplified with anti-IgG. The technology has been miniaturized and etched into a 4×6mm silicon chip that can measure 32 different reactions in quadruplicate simultaneously. The variability between 128 rings on a chip as measured by 2M salt assays averaged 0.6% CV. The output of the assays is the average shift per cluster of 4 rings, and the assays averaged 0.5% CV between clusters. The variability between chips averaged 1.8%. Running the same array on multiple instruments showed that after some improvements to the wavelength referencing system, the upper boundary of variation was 3% between 13 different instruments. The immunoassay displayed about 2% higher variability than the salt assays. There are several outstanding features of this system. The amount of antigen used on the chip for each test is around 200 picograms, only a few microliters of sample is necessary, and the assays take <10min.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antinucleares/sangre , Técnicas Biosensibles/métodos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Luz , Procedimientos Analíticos en Microchip/métodos , Óptica y Fotónica/métodos , Pruebas Serológicas/métodos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Técnicas Biosensibles/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/instrumentación , Dispositivos Laboratorio en un Chip , Miniaturización , Óptica y Fotónica/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pruebas Serológicas/instrumentación , Silicio/efectos de la radiación , Factores de Tiempo , Transductores , Flujo de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA