HLA-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 modify the presentation and outcome in autoimmune hepatitis type-1.

The classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 alleles are established autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) risk alleles. To study the immune-modifying effect of these alleles, we imputed the genotypes from genome-wide association data in 649 Dutch AIH type-1 patients. We therefore compared the international AIH group (IAIHG) diagnostic scores as well as the underlying clinical characteristics between patients positive and negative for these HLA alleles. Seventy-five percent of the AIH patients were HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01 positive. HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01-positive patients had a higher median IAIHG score than HLA-DRB1*03:01/HLA-DRB1*04:01-negative patients (P<0.001). We did not observe associations between HLA alleles and alanine transaminase levels (HLA-DRB1*03:01: P=0.2; HLA-DRB1*04:01; P=0.5); however, HLA-DRB1*03:01 was independently associated with higher immunoglobulin G levels (P=0.04). The HLA-DRB1*04:01 allele was independently associated with presentation at older age (P=0.03) and a female predominance (P=0.04). HLA-DRB1*03:01-positive patients received immunosuppressive medication and liver transplantation. In conclusion, the HLA-DRB1*03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01 alleles are both independently associated with the aggregate diagnostic IAIHG score in type-1 AIH patients, but are not essential for AIH development. HLA-DRB1*03:01 is the strongest genetic modifier of disease severity in AIH.

MAdCAM-1 does not play a central role in the early pathophysiology of autoimmune hepatitis.

INTRODUCTION: CD4+ T cells are thought to have a central role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) directs homing of CD4+ T cells in the alimentary tract and is a therapeutic target in inflammatory bowel diseases. Here we assessed MAdCAM-1 expression in AIH and viral hepatitis and related its expression with immune infiltrate analysis and histopathological key features. METHODS: Hepatic portal areas of pretreatment biopsies (n=10) and follow-up biopsies (n=9) of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AIH were assessed for MAdCAM-1 expression and infiltrate composition using immunohistochemistry and multispectral imaging (Vectra® Polaris™). Controls consisted of biopsies of patients with untreated chronic viral hepatitis B or C (n=22). RESULTS: MAdCAM-1 expression on endothelium was sparsely present in portal fields of two treatment-naïve AIH patients. Three patients showed MAdCAM-1 expression within lymphoid aggregates. No expression of significance (including single-cell expression) was observed in the remaining 6 patients. In contrast, viral hepatitis C biopsies showed endothelial MAdCAM-1 expression in 8 of 13 untreated patients. Densities of both B-cells (CD20+) and CD4+ T-cells (CD3+ CD8-) were increased in AIH and viral hepatitis patients with MAdCAM-1 expression. CONCLUSION: MAdCAM-1 was detected in liver biopsies in a minority of patients with AIH at the time of diagnosis suggesting no central role in its pathophysiology. Lymphoid or reticular MAdCAM-1 pattern expression was associated with more dense infiltrates of both B-cells and CD4+ T-cells, and may be related to the formation of secondary lymphoid follicles.

Real-world management of juvenile autoimmune liver disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Juvenile autoimmune liver disease (JAILD) includes paediatric forms of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis (ASC). Since evidence is scarce, there are currently no evidence-based management guidelines for juvenile AIH. This survey was carried out amongst the paediatric members of the International AIH Group (IAIHG) to describe their practices in the management of JAILD. METHODS: An online survey questionnaire was distributed to members of the IAIHG with active practice (https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/Juvenile_AILD). The questionnaire consisted of four clinical scenarios on different presentations of AIH. RESULTS: Fifty-eight surveys were sent to the IAIHG members, out of which 43 (74%, 22 countries, four continents) were returned. None reported budesonide as a first-line induction agent for the acute presentation of AIH. Sixteen (37%) routinely perform liver biopsy at three years of biochemical remission. Thirty-five respondents (81%) perform magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) at presentation. Ciclosporin is the most widely used second-line agent (number of patients treated = ∼360, 21 centres). Mycophenolate mofetil (n = ∼225, 31 centres), tacrolimus (n = ∼130, 21 centres) and sirolimus (n = ∼5, 3 centres) are less often reported. Rescue therapy with infliximab and rituximab has been tried in eight centres (n = ∼19) and nine centres (n = ∼16), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Prednisolone remains the preferred first-line induction agent in JAILD. MRC at presentation is performed by the large majority of participants. Participants reported a wide variation in performing liver biopsy for therapy evaluation during follow-up. Within the paediatric members of the IAIHG there is considerable experience with second-line therapeutic agents.

Expert clinical management of autoimmune hepatitis in the real world.

BACKGROUND: High-quality data on the management of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are scarce. Despite published guidelines, management of AIH is still expert based rather than evidence based. AIM: To survey expert hepatologists, asking each to describe their practices in the management of patients with AIH. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was distributed to members of the International AIH Group. The questionnaire consisted of four clinical scenarios on different presentations of AIH. RESULTS: Sixty surveys were sent, out of which 37 were returned. None reported budesonide as a first line induction agent for the acute presentation of AIH. Five (14%) participants reported using thiopurine S-methyltransferase measurements before commencement of thiopurine maintenance therapy. Thirteen (35%) routinely perform liver biopsy at 2 years of biochemical remission. If histological inflammatory activity is absent, four (11%) participants reduced azathioprine, whereas 10 (27%) attempted withdrawal altogether. Regarding the management of difficult-to-treat patients, mycophenolate mofetil is the most widely used second-line agent (n = ~450 in 28 centres), whereas tacrolimus (n = ~115 in 21 centres) and ciclosporin (n = ~112 in 18 centres) are less often reported. One centre reported considerable experience with infliximab, while rescue therapy with rituximab has been tried in seven centres. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in the management of patients with autoimmune hepatitis even among the most expert in the field. Although good quality evidence is lacking, there is considerable experience with second-line therapies. Future prospective studies should address these issues, so that we move from an expert- to an evidence- and personalised-based care in autoimmune hepatitis.

Allopurinol safely and effectively optimises thiopurine metabolites in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Ten percent of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are nonresponsive or intolerant to thiopurine therapy. A skewed metabolism, leading to the preferential generation of (hepato)toxic thiopurine metabolites (6-MMPs) instead of the metabolic active 6-tioguanine (thioguanine) nucleotides (6-TGNs), may explain this unfavourable outcome. Co-administration of allopurinol to low-dose thiopurine therapy may effectively revert this deviant metabolism, as has been shown in inflammatory bowel disease. AIM: To describe the effect of adding allopurinol to low-dose thiopurine therapy in patients with AIH with intolerance or nonresponse to normal thiopurine dosages due to a skewed metabolism. METHODS: We describe the clinical efficacy and tolerability of allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy with allopurinol 100 mg and low-dose thiopurine (25-33% of the original dosage) in eight AIH patients with a skewed thiopurine metabolism. Patients were switched because of dose-limiting intolerance (n = 3), nonresponse (n = 3) or loss of response (n = 2) to conventional thiopurine treatment. RESULTS: All eight patients showed biochemical improvement with a reduction in median alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of 62 U/L at start to 35 U/L at 1 month (P = 0.03). This clinical benefit was sustained in seven patients. Allopurinol-thiopurine combination therapy effectively bypassed thiopurine side effects in four of five patients. Median 6-tioguanine nucleotides levels increased from 100 to 200 pmol/8 × 10(8) red blood cells (RBC) at 3 months (P = 0.04). Median 6-MMP levels decreased in all patients from 6090 to 175 pmol/8 × 10(8) RBC (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Allopurinol safely and effectively optimises thiopurine therapy in patients with autoimmune hepatitis with intolerance and/or nonresponse due to an unfavourable thiopurine metabolism.

A case of autoimmune hepatitis and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory liver disease of unknown aetiology usually requiring long-term immunosuppressive therapy. We present the case of an AIH patient who received long-term corticosteroids and azathioprine. As treatment for concomitant osteoporosis she was also treated with potent intravenous bisphosphonate (BP). This treatment was complicated by the development of BP-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). BRONJ is an uncommon complication of BP treatment regimes that occurs at increased frequency in the presence of other risk factors, including chronic inflammatory conditions. Our patient suffered from a severe and complicated clinical course of BRONJ which, despite adequate therapy, resulted in death of the patient. Here we discuss the risk factors for the development and clinical course of BRONJ in AIH and the implications for management of these patients.