Challenges in the diagnosis and management of acromegaly: a focus on comorbidities.

INTRODUCTION: Acromegaly is a rare, insidious disease resulting from the overproduction of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and is associated with a range of comorbidities. The extent of associated complications and mortality risk is related to length of exposure to the excess GH and IGF-1, thus early diagnosis and treatment is imperative. Unfortunately, acromegaly is often diagnosed late, when patients already have a wide range of comorbidities. The presence of comorbid conditions contributes significantly to patient morbidity/mortality and impaired quality of life. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective literature review for information relating to the diagnosis of acromegaly, and its associated comorbidities using PubMed. The main aim of this review is to highlight the issues of comorbidities in acromegaly, and to reinforce the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Successful management of acromegaly goes beyond treating the disease itself, since many patients are diagnosed late in disease evolution, they present with a range of comorbid conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and sleep apnea. It is important that patients are screened carefully at diagnosis (and thereafter), for common associated complications, and that biochemical control does not become the only treatment goal. Mortality and morbidities in acromegaly can be reduced successfully if patients are treated using a multimodal approach with comprehensive comorbidity management.

Challenges in the orthodontic treatment of a patient with pycnodysostosis.

Pycnodysostosis is a rare, autosomal recessive syndrome characterized by osteosclerosis, brittle bones, stunting, and significant craniofacial changes. The objective of this study was to report a case of a 6-year-old patient with pycnodysostosis orthodontically treated and followed up until age 10 years and to discuss the risk factors, options for orthodontic treatment, and limitations involving this type of treatment, which has not yet been performed. Prevention through counseling and periodic follow-up visits is essential in eliminating factors that predispose patients to infections and fractures. New studies are necessary to establish safe and efficient orthodontic treatment plans.

Analysis of craniofacial and extremity growth in patients with growth hormone deficiency during growth hormone therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There are many controversies regarding side effects on craniofacial and extremity growth due to growth hormone (GH) treatment. Our aim was to estimate GH action on craniofacial development and extremity growth in GH-deficient patients. METHODS: Twenty patients with GH deficiency with a chronological age ranging from 4.6 to 24.3 years (bone age from 1.5 to 13 years) were divided in 2 groups: group 1 (n = 6), naive to GH treatment, and group 2 (n = 14), ongoing GH treatment for 2-11 years. GH doses (0.1-0.15 U/kg/day) were adjusted to maintain insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 levels within the normal range. Anthropometric measurements, cephalometric analyses and facial photographs to verify profile and harmony were performed annually for at least 3 years. RESULTS: Two patients with a disharmonious profile due to mandibular growth attained harmony, and none of them developed facial disharmony. Increased hand or foot size (>P97) was observed in 2 female patients and in 4 patients (1 female), respectively, both not correlated with GH treatment duration and increased levels of insulin-like growth factor 1. CONCLUSIONS: GH treatment with standard doses in GH-deficient patients can improve the facial profile in retrognathic patients and does not lead to facial disharmony although extremity growth, mainly involving the feet, can occur.

Acromegalic features in growth hormone (GH)-deficient patients after long-term GH therapy.

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial, hand, foot and somatic growth depend on normal GH secretion. Acromegalic features have been described in children with GH insensitivity after IGF-I treatment. We observed patients with acromegalic features such as increase of foot size, nose and jaw enlargement among our cases with GH deficiency, treated with standard recombinant (rh)GH doses. The aim of our study was to analyse the possible factors involved in the development of acromegalic features in these patients. PATIENTS: We evaluated 21 patients, 17 with combined pituitary hormone deficiency and four with isolated GH deficiency treated with rhGH (0.05-0.15 U/kg/day, sc, at night) for 2-12 years who achieved final height. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured before and every 6 months during therapy and bone age was evaluated yearly. At the end of therapy, patients' hand and foot sizes and height were measured and plotted on nomograms for hand according to height and age, and foot size according to height. Lateral radiographs of the face were performed to obtain the linear measurement of the lower jaw length. RESULTS: Foot size was greater than 97th percentile in 8/21 patients and lower jaw length was greater than +2SD in 4/21 patients. Patients were classified in two groups: group 1 (with foot size greater than 97th percentile and/or lower jaw length greater than +2SD) consisted of 11 patients (six females); nine had combined pituitary hormone deficiency (six associated to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism) and three had isolated GH deficiency; group 2 (with foot size smaller than 97th percentile and lower jaw length less than +2SD) consisted of 10 patients (seven boys); nine had combined pituitary hormone deficiency (six associated to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism) and one with isolated GH deficiency. During treatment, IGF-I levels ranged from < or = 3 to +2SD and IGFBP-3 levels ranged from -3 to +2SD, in both groups. We observed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding chronological age, bone age, height at the beginning and at the end of therapy, pubertal development, duration of rhGH treatment and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels (P > 0.05). Foot size percentile exceeded final height percentile in 11/21 patients (seven girls). CONCLUSION: Long-term rhGH treatment with standard doses might be associated with acromegalic features (increased foot size and lower jaw measurements) in patients with GH deficiency who achieved final height, especially in girls. Neither the clinical nor the hormonal parameters, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels, were useful to predict the development of these features. Further studies are necessary to analyse the frequency of this side-effect and how to prevent it.