RESUMEN
Much of current molecular and cell biology research relies on the ability to purify cell types by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). FACS typically relies on the ability to label cell types of interest with antibodies or fluorescent transgenic constructs. However, antibody availability is often limited, and genetic manipulation is labor intensive or impossible in the case of primary human tissue. To date, no systematic method exists to enrich for cell types without a priori knowledge of cell-type markers. Here, we propose GateID, a computational method that combines single-cell transcriptomics with FACS index sorting to purify cell types of choice using only native cellular properties such as cell size, granularity, and mitochondrial content. We validate GateID by purifying various cell types from zebrafish kidney marrow and the human pancreas to high purity without resorting to specific antibodies or transgenes.
Asunto(s)
Separación Celular/métodos , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Transcriptoma , Animales , Humanos , Riñón/citología , Páncreas/citología , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Pez Cebra/anatomía & histologíaRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Inflammation induces beta cell dysfunction and demise but underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. The apolipoprotein L (APOL) family of genes has been associated with innate immunity and apoptosis in non-pancreatic cell types, but also with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we hypothesised that APOL genes play a role in inflammation-induced beta cell damage. METHODS: We used single-cell transcriptomics datasets of primary human pancreatic islet cells to study the expression of APOL genes upon specific stress conditions. Validation of the findings was carried out in EndoC-ßH1 cells and primary human islets. Finally, we performed loss- and gain-of-function experiments to investigate the role of APOL genes in beta cells. RESULTS: APOL genes are expressed in primary human beta cells and APOL1, 2 and 6 are strongly upregulated upon inflammation via the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway. APOL1 overexpression increases endoplasmic reticulum stress while APOL1 knockdown prevents cytokine-induced beta cell death and interferon-associated response. Furthermore, we found that APOL genes are upregulated in beta cells from donors with type 2 diabetes compared with donors without diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: APOLs are novel regulators of islet inflammation and may contribute to beta cell damage during the development of diabetes. DATA AVAILABILITY: scRNAseq data generated by our laboratory and used in this study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/ ), accession number GSE218316.
Asunto(s)
Apolipoproteína L1 , Inflamación , Células Secretoras de Insulina , Humanos , Apolipoproteína L1/genética , Apolipoproteína L1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Inflamación/genética , Inflamación/metabolismo , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/patologíaRESUMEN
Residual beta cells are present in most patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes but it is unknown whether these beta cells react normally to different stimuli. Moreover a defect in proinsulin conversion and abnormal alpha cell response are also part of the islet dysfunction. A three-phase [euglycemia, hyperglycemia, and hyperglycemia + glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1)] clamp was performed in patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes. Intravenous arginine boluses were administered at the end of each phase. On another day, a mixed meal stimulation test with a subsequent intravenous arginine bolus was performed. C-peptide was detectable in a subgroup of subjects at baseline (2/15) or only after stimulation (3/15). When detectable, C-peptide increased 2.9-fold [95% CI: 1.2-7.1] during the hyperglycemia phase and 14.1-fold [95% CI: 3.1-65.2] during the hyperglycemia + GLP-1 phase, and 22.3-fold [95% CI: 5.6-89.1] during hyperglycemia + GLP-1 + arginine phase when compared with baseline. The same subset of patients with a C-peptide response were identified during the mixed meal stimulation test as during the clamp. There was an inhibition of glucagon secretion (0.72-fold, [95% CI: 0.63-0.84]) during the glucose clamp irrespective of the presence of detectable beta cell function. Proinsulin was only present in a subset of subjects with detectable C-peptide (3/15) and proinsulin mimicked the C-peptide response to the different stimuli when detectable. Residual beta cells in longstanding type 1 diabetes respond adequately to different stimuli and could be of clinical benefit.NEW & NOTEWORTHY If beta cell function is detectable, the beta cells react relatively normal to the different stimuli except for the first phase response to intravenous glucose. An oral mixed meal followed by an intravenous arginine bolus can identify residual beta cell function/mass as well as the more commonly used glucose potentiated arginine-induced insulin secretion during a hyperglycemic clamp.
Asunto(s)
Arginina , Péptido C , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Alimentos Formulados , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Glucosa , Islotes Pancreáticos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arginina/administración & dosificación , Arginina/farmacología , Glucemia/metabolismo , Péptido C/sangre , Péptido C/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Glucagón/metabolismo , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/administración & dosificación , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/metabolismo , Glucosa/administración & dosificación , Glucosa/metabolismo , Técnica de Clampeo de la Glucosa , Hiperglucemia/metabolismo , Insulina/metabolismo , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/efectos de los fármacos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/fisiología , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , Islotes Pancreáticos/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (aNRP) is an in situ normothermic oxygenated donor perfusion technique before procurement during controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) procedures and allows for organ quality evaluation. There are few data on the effect of aNRP on pancreatic islet isolation and subsequent transplantation outcomes. We aim to evaluate the impact of aNRP on cDCD pancreatic islet isolation and transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed on pancreatic islet isolation outcomes from aNRP, cDCD, and donation after brain death pancreases. Isolations were compared to previous donor age (60-75 years) matched isolations. Islet function was assessed by a dynamic glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Donor baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Isolations from aNRP pancreases (471 739 islet equivalents [IEQ] [655 435-244 851]) yielded more islets compared to cDCD (218 750 IEQ [375 951-112 364], P < .01) and to donation after brain death (206 522 IEQ [385 544-142 446], P = .03) pancreases. Dynamic glucose-stimulated insulin secretion tests in 7 aNRP islet preparations showed a mean stimulation index of 4.91, indicating good functionality. Bilirubin and alanine aminotransferase during aNRP correlated with islet yield (r2 = 0.685, P = .002; r2 = 0.491, P = .016, respectively). Islet isolation after aNRP in cDCD donors results in a high islet yield with viable functional islets. aNRP could increase the utilization of the pancreases for islet transplantation.
RESUMEN
Insulin secretion in pancreatic ß-cells is regulated by cortical complexes that are enriched at the sites of adhesion to extracellular matrix facing the vasculature. Many components of these complexes, including bassoon, RIM, ELKS and liprins, are shared with neuronal synapses. Here, we show that insulin secretion sites also contain the non-neuronal proteins LL5ß (also known as PHLDB2) and KANK1, which, in migrating cells, organize exocytotic machinery in the vicinity of integrin-based adhesions. Depletion of LL5ß or focal adhesion disassembly triggered by myosin II inhibition perturbed the clustering of secretory complexes and attenuated the first wave of insulin release. Although previous analyses in vitro and in neurons have suggested that secretory machinery might assemble through liquid-liquid phase separation, analysis of endogenously labeled ELKS in pancreatic islets indicated that its dynamics is inconsistent with such a scenario. Instead, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and single-molecule imaging showed that ELKS turnover is driven by binding and unbinding to low-mobility scaffolds. Both the scaffold movements and ELKS exchange were stimulated by glucose treatment. Our findings help to explain how integrin-based adhesions control spatial organization of glucose-stimulated insulin release.
Asunto(s)
Células Secretoras de Insulina , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/metabolismo , Exocitosis , Glucosa/metabolismo , Insulina/metabolismo , Secreción de Insulina , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismoRESUMEN
A public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic has behavioral, mental and physical implications in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To what extent the presence of a transplant further increases this burden is not known. Therefore, we compared T1D patients with an islet or pancreas transplant (ß-cell Tx; n = 51) to control T1D patients (n = 272). Fear of coronavirus infection was higher in those with ß-cell Tx than without (Visual Analogue Scale 5.0 (3.0-7.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0-5.0), p = 0.004) and social isolation behavior was more stringent (45.8% vs. 14.0% reported not leaving the house, p < 0.001). A previous ß-cell Tx was the most important predictor of at-home isolation. Glycemic control worsened in patients with ß-cell Tx, but improved in control patients (ΔHbA1c +1.67 ± 8.74 vs. -1.72 ± 6.15 mmol/mol, p = 0.006; ΔTime-In-Range during continuous glucose monitoring -4.5% (-6.0%-1.5%) vs. +3.0% (-2.0%-6.0%), p = 0.038). Fewer patients with ß-cell Tx reported easier glycemic control during lockdown (10.4% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.015). All T1D patients, regardless of transplantation status, experienced stress (33.4%), anxiety (27.9%), decreased physical activity (42.0%), weight gain (40.5%), and increased insulin requirements (29.7%). In conclusion, T1D patients with ß-cell Tx are increasingly affected by a viral pandemic lockdown with higher fear of infection, more stringent social isolation behavior and deterioration of glycemic control. This trial has been registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry under identifying number NCT05977205 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05977205).
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Células Secretoras de Insulina , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ansiedad , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Control Glucémico , Pandemias , Salud PúblicaRESUMEN
The main hallmark in the development of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes is a decline in functional ß-cell mass. This decline is predominantly attributed to ß-cell death, although recent findings suggest that the loss of ß-cell identity may also contribute to ß-cell dysfunction. This phenomenon is characterized by a reduced expression of key markers associated with ß-cell identity. This review delves into the insights gained from single-cell omics research specifically focused on ß-cell identity. It highlights how single-cell omics based studies have uncovered an unexpected level of heterogeneity among ß-cells and have facilitated the identification of distinct ß-cell subpopulations through the discovery of cell surface markers, transcriptional regulators, the upregulation of stress-related genes, and alterations in chromatin activity. Furthermore, specific subsets of ß-cells have been identified in diabetes, such as displaying an immature, dedifferentiated gene signature, expressing significantly lower insulin mRNA levels, and expressing increased ß-cell precursor markers. Additionally, single-cell omics has increased insight into the detrimental effects of diabetes-associated conditions, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, oxidative stress, and inflammation, on ß-cell identity. Lastly, this review outlines the factors that may influence the identification of ß-cell subpopulations when designing and performing a single-cell omics experiment.
Asunto(s)
Células Secretoras de Insulina , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Humanos , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Animales , Genómica/métodos , Estrés del Retículo Endoplásmico/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patologíaRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Transcriptome analyses revealed insulin-gene-derived transcripts in non-beta endocrine islet cells. We studied alternative splicing of human INS mRNA in pancreatic islets. METHODS: Alternative splicing of insulin pre-mRNA was determined by PCR analysis performed on human islet RNA and single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Antisera were generated to detect insulin variants in human pancreatic tissue using immunohistochemistry, electron microscopy and single-cell western blot to confirm the expression of insulin variants. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activation was determined by MIP-1ß release. RESULTS: We identified an alternatively spliced INS product. This variant encodes the complete insulin signal peptide and B chain and an alternative C-terminus that largely overlaps with a previously identified defective ribosomal product of INS. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the translation product of this INS-derived splice transcript was detectable in somatostatin-producing delta cells but not in beta cells; this was confirmed by light and electron microscopy. Expression of this alternatively spliced INS product activated preproinsulin-specific CTLs in vitro. The exclusive presence of this alternatively spliced INS product in delta cells may be explained by its clearance from beta cells by insulin-degrading enzyme capturing its insulin B chain fragment and a lack of insulin-degrading enzyme expression in delta cells. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data demonstrate that delta cells can express an INS product derived from alternative splicing, containing both the diabetogenic insulin signal peptide and B chain, in their secretory granules. We propose that this alternative INS product may play a role in islet autoimmunity and pathology, as well as endocrine or paracrine function or islet development and endocrine destiny, and transdifferentiation between endocrine cells. INS promoter activity is not confined to beta cells and should be used with care when assigning beta cell identity and selectivity. DATA AVAILABILITY: The full EM dataset is available via www.nanotomy.org (for review: http://www.nanotomy.org/OA/Tienhoven2021SUB/6126-368/ ). Single-cell RNA-seq data was made available by Segerstolpe et al [13] and can be found at https://sandberglab.se/pancreas . The RNA and protein sequence of INS-splice was uploaded to GenBank (BankIt2546444 INS-splice OM489474).
Asunto(s)
Insulisina , Islotes Pancreáticos , Humanos , Células Secretoras de Somatostatina/metabolismo , Insulisina/metabolismo , Insulina/genética , Insulina/metabolismo , Islotes Pancreáticos/metabolismo , ARN , Señales de Clasificación de ProteínaRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: There is a lack of e-health systems that integrate the complex variety of aspects relevant for diabetes self-management. We developed and field-tested an e-health system (POWER2DM) that integrates medical, psychological and behavioural aspects and connected wearables to support patients and healthcare professionals in shared decision making and diabetes self-management. METHODS: Participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (aged >18 years) from hospital outpatient diabetes clinics in the Netherlands and Spain were randomised using randomisation software to POWER2DM or usual care for 37 weeks. This RCT assessed the change in HbA1c between the POWER2DM and usual care groups at the end of the study (37 weeks) as a primary outcome measure. Participants and clinicians were not blinded to the intervention. Changes in quality of life (QoL) (WHO-5 Well-Being Index [WHO-5]), diabetes self-management (Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire - Revised [DSMQ-R]), glycaemic profiles from continuous glucose monitoring devices, awareness of hypoglycaemia (Clarke hypoglycaemia unawareness instrument), incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes and technology acceptance were secondary outcome measures. Additionally, sub-analyses were performed for participants with type 1 and type 2 diabetes separately. RESULTS: A total of 226 participants participated in the trial (108 with type 1 diabetes; 118 with type 2 diabetes). In the POWER2DM group (n=111), HbA1c decreased from 60.6±14.7 mmol/mol (7.7±1.3%) to 56.7±12.1 mmol/mol (7.3±1.1%) (means ± SD, p<0.001), compared with no change in the usual care group (n=115) (baseline: 61.7±13.7 mmol/mol, 7.8±1.3%; end of study: 61.0±12.4 mmol/mol, 7.7±1.1%; p=0.19) (between-group difference 0.24%, p=0.008). In the sub-analyses in the POWER2DM group, HbA1c in participants with type 2 diabetes decreased from 62.3±17.3 mmol/mol (7.9±1.6%) to 54.3±11.1 mmol/mol (7.1±1.0%) (p<0.001) compared with no change in HbA1c in participants with type 1 diabetes (baseline: 58.8±11.2 mmol/mol [7.5±1.0%]; end of study: 59.2±12.7 mmol/mol [7.6±1.2%]; p=0.84). There was an increase in the time during which interstitial glucose levels were between 3.0 and 3.9 mmol/l in the POWER2DM group, but no increase in clinically relevant hypoglycaemia (interstitial glucose level below 3.0 mmol/l). QoL improved in participants with type 1 diabetes in the POWER2DM group compared with the usual care group (baseline: 15.7±3.8; end of study: 16.3±3.5; p=0.047 for between-group difference). Diabetes self-management improved in both participants with type 1 diabetes (from 7.3±1.2 to 7.7±1.2; p=0.002) and those with type 2 diabetes (from 6.5±1.3 to 6.7±1.3; p=0.003) within the POWER2DM group. The POWER2DM integrated e-health support was well accepted in daily life and no important adverse (or unexpected) effects or side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: POWER2DM improves HbA1c levels compared with usual care in those with type 2 diabetes, improves QoL in those with type 1 diabetes, improves diabetes self-management in those with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and is well accepted in daily life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03588104. FUNDING: This study was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement number 689444).
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglucemia , Automanejo , Telemedicina , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Hipoglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Islet transplantation stabilizes glycemic control in patients with complicated diabetes mellitus. Rapid functional decline could be due to islet allograft rejection. However, there is no reliable method to assess rejection, and treatment protocols are absent. We aimed to characterize diagnostic features of islet allograft rejection and assess effectiveness of high-dose methylprednisolone treatment. Over a median follow-up of 61.8 months, 22% (9 of 41) of islet transplant recipients experienced 10 suspected rejection episodes (SREs). All first SREs occurred within 18 months after transplantation. Important features were unexplained hyperglycemia (all cases), unexplained C-peptide decrease (ΔC-peptide, 77.1% [-59.1% to -91.6%]; ΔC-peptide:glucose, -76.3% [-49.2% to -90.4%]), predisposing event (5 of 10 cases), and increased immunologic risk (5 of 10 cases). At 6 months post-SRE, patients who received protocolized methylprednisolone (n = 4) had significantly better islet function than untreated patients (n = 4), according to C-peptide (1.39 ± 0.59 vs 0.14 ± 0.19 nmol/L; P = .007), Igls score (good [4 of 4 cases] vs failure [3 of 4 cases] or marginal [1 of 4 cases]; P = .018) and ß score (6.0 [6.0-6.0] vs 1.0 [0.0-3.5]; P = .013). SREs are prevalent among islet transplant recipients and are associated with loss of islet graft function. Timely treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone mitigates this loss. Unexplained hyperglycemia, unexpected C-peptide decrease, a predisposing event, and elevated immunologic risk are diagnostic indicators for SRE.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Humanos , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Péptido C , Péptidos , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperglucemia/etiología , AloinjertosRESUMEN
Islet delivery devices (IDDs) offer potential benefits for islet transplantation and stem cell-based replacement in type 1 diabetes. Little is known about patient preferences regarding islet delivery device characteristics and implantation strategies. Patient preferences for IDDs and implantation strategies remain understudied. We invited patients, parents and caregivers to fill in an online questionnaire regarding IDDs. An online survey gathered responses from 809 type 1 diabetes patients and 47 caregivers. We also assessed diabetes distress in a subgroup of 412 patients. A significant majority (97%) expressed willingness to receive an IDD. Preferred IDD attributes included a 3.5 cm diameter for 37.7% of respondents, while when provided with all options, 30.4% found dimensions unimportant. Respondents were open to approximately 4 implants, each with a 5 cm incision. Many favored a device functioning for 12 months (33.4%) or 24 months (24.8%). Younger participants (16-30) were more inclined to accept a 6 months functional duration (p < 0.001). Functional duration outweighed implant quantity and size (p < 0.001) in device importance. This emphasizes patients' willingness to accommodate burdens related to IDD features and implantation methods, crucial for designing future beta cell replacement strategies.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos/métodos , Prioridad del PacienteRESUMEN
The purpose of pancreas or islet transplantation is to restore glycemic control in order to mitigate diabetes-related complications and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Complications from chronic pancreas allograft rejection may lead to transplantectomy, even when the endocrine function remains preserved. We present first evidence of a successful HLA incompatible islet re-transplantation with islets isolated from a rejecting pancreas allograft after simultaneous kidney pancreas transplantation. The pancreas allograft was removed because of progressively painful pancreatic panniculitis from clinically uncontrolled chronic rejection. The endocrine function was preserved. Induction treatment for this "islet alloautotransplantation" consisted of plasmapheresis, IVIg and alemtuzumab. At 1 year, the patient retained islet graft function with good glycemic control and absence of severe hypoglycemia, despite persistent low-grade HLA donor-specific antibodies. His panniculitis had resolved completely. In our point of view, islet alloautotransplantation derived from a chronically rejecting pancreas allograft is a potential option to salvage (partial) islet function, despite preformed donor-specific antibodies, in order to maintain stable glycemic control. Thereby it protects against severe hypoglycemia, and it potentially mitigates kidney graft dysfunction and other diabetes-related complications in patients with continued need for immunosuppression and who are otherwise difficult to retransplant.
Asunto(s)
Hipoglucemia , Páncreas , Humanos , Trasplante Homólogo , Riñón , Anticuerpos , AloinjertosRESUMEN
During pancreatic development, endocrine cells appear from the pancreatic epithelium when Neurog3-positive cells delaminate and differentiate into α-, ß-, γ- and δ-cells. The mechanisms involved in this process are still incompletely understood. We characterized the temporal, lineage-specific developmental programs during pancreatic development by sequencing the transcriptome of thousands of individual pancreatic cells from E12.5 to E18.5 in mice, and identified all known cell types that are present in the embryonic pancreas, but focused specifically on α- and ß-cell differentiation by enrichment of a MIP-GFP reporter. We characterized transcriptomic heterogeneity in the tip domain based on proliferation, and characterized two endocrine precursor clusters marked by expression of Neurog3 and Fev Pseudotime analysis revealed specific branches for developing α- and ß-cells, which allowed identification of specific gene regulation patterns. These include some known and many previously unreported genes that appear to define pancreatic cell fate transitions. This resource allows dynamic profiling of embryonic pancreas development at single cell resolution and reveals novel gene signatures during pancreatic differentiation into α- and ß-cells.
Asunto(s)
Linaje de la Célula , Regulación del Desarrollo de la Expresión Génica , Células Secretoras de Glucagón/citología , Células Secretoras de Insulina/citología , Páncreas/embriología , Transcriptoma , Animales , Factores de Transcripción con Motivo Hélice-Asa-Hélice Básico/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular , Separación Celular , Citometría de Flujo , Biblioteca de Genes , Proteínas Fluorescentes Verdes/metabolismo , Ratones , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/metabolismo , Organogénesis , Células Madre/citología , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
A global online survey was administered to 69 islet transplantation programs, covering 84 centers and 5 networks. The survey addressed questions on program organization and activity in the 2000-2020 period, including impact on activity of national health care coverage policies. We obtained full data from 55 institutions or networks worldwide and basic activity data from 6 centers. Additional data were obtained from alternative sources. A total of 94 institutions and 5 networks was identified as having performed islet allotransplantation. 4,365 islet allotransplants (2,608 in Europe, 1,475 in North America, 135 in Asia, 119 in Oceania, 28 in South America) were reported in 2,170 patients in the survey period. From 15 centers active at the start of the study period, the number of simultaneously active islet centers peaked at 54, to progressively decrease to 26 having performed islet allotransplants in 2020. Notably, only 16 centers/networks have done >100 islet allotransplants in the survey period. Types of transplants performed differed notably between North America and the rest of the world, in particular with respect to the near-absence of simultaneous islet-kidney transplantation. Absence of heath care coverage has significantly hampered transplant activity in the past years and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Trasplante de Páncreas , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMEN
Assessment of specific ß-cell death can be used to determine the quality and viability of pancreatic islets prior to transplantation and hence predict the suitability of the pancreas for isolation. Recently, several groups have demonstrated that unmethylated insulin (INS)-DNA is correlated to ß-cell death in type 1 diabetes patients and during clinical islet isolation and subsequent transplantation. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol of our novel developed method for quantification of the relative amount of unmethylated INS-DNA using methylation sensitive restriction enzyme digital polymerase chain reaction This method provides a novel and sensitive way to quantify the relative amount of ß-cell derived unmethylated INS-DNA in cellular lysate. We therefore suggest that this technique can be of value to reliably determine the purity of an islet preparation and may also serve as a measure of the quality of islets prior to transplantation measuring unmethylated INS-DNA as a reflection of the relative amount of lysed ß-cells.
Asunto(s)
Células Secretoras de Insulina , Islotes Pancreáticos , ADN/genética , ADN/metabolismo , Metilación de ADN , Humanos , Insulina/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/fisiología , Reacción en Cadena de la PolimerasaRESUMEN
Due to a shortage of donation after brain death (DBD) organs, donation after circulatory death (DCD) is increasingly performed. In the field of islet transplantation, there is uncertainty regarding the suitability of DCD pancreas in terms of islet yield and function after islet isolation. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential use of DCD pancreas for islet transplantation. Islet isolation procedures from 126 category 3 DCD and 258 DBD pancreas were performed in a 9-year period. Islet yield after isolation was significantly lower for DCD compared to DBD pancreas (395 515 islet equivalents [IEQ] and 480 017 IEQ, respectively; p = .003). The decrease in IEQ during 2 days of culture was not different between the two groups. Warm ischemia time was not related to DCD islet yield. In vitro insulin secretion after a glucose challenge was similar between DCD and DBD islets. After islet transplantation, DCD islet graft recipients had similar graft function (AUC C-peptide) during mixed meal tolerance tests and Igls score compared to DBD graft recipients. In conclusion, DCD islets can be considered for clinical islet transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Muerte Encefálica , Muerte , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Páncreas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
In order to assess ß cell secretory capacity after islet transplantation, standardized mixed meal stimulation tests are often used. But these tests are cumbersome and the effect of exogenous insulin on the test results is unclear. The aim of our study was to determine to what extent fasting glycemic indices can estimate stimulated ß cell function in islet transplant recipients with and without basal insulin. In total 100 mixed meal stimulation tests, including 31 with concurrent basal insulin treatment, were performed in 36 islet transplant recipients. In a multivariate model, fasting C-peptide and fasting glucose together estimated peak C-peptide with R2 = .87 and area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide with a R2 = .93. There was a larger increase of glucose during tests in which exogenous insulin was used (+7.9 vs +5.3 mmol/L, P < .001) and exogenous insulin use was associated with a slightly lower estimated peak C-peptide (relative change: -15%, P = .02). In islet transplant recipients the combination of fasting C-peptide and glucose can be used to accurately estimate stimulated ß cell function after a mixed meal stimulation test, whether exogenous basal insulin is present or not. These data indicate that graft function can be reliably determined during exogenous insulin treatment and that regular islet graft stimulation tests can be minimized.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Islotes Pancreáticos , Islotes Pancreáticos , Glucemia , Péptido C , Ayuno , Humanos , InsulinaRESUMEN
The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Páncreas , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis RenalRESUMEN
Optimal glycemic control in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes is associated with improved morbidity and better patient and allograft survival. Transplant options for patients with diabetes requiring insulin therapy and chronic kidney disease who are suitable candidates for kidney transplantation should include consideration of ß-cell replacement therapy: pancreas or islet transplantation. International variation related to national regulatory policies exists in offering one or both options to suitable candidates and is further affected by pancreas/islet allocation policies and transplant waiting list dynamics. The selection of appropriate candidates depends on patient age, coexistent morbidities, the timing of referral to the transplant center (predialysis versus on dialysis) and availability of living kidney donors. Therefore, early referral (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) is of the utmost importance to ensure adequate time for informed decision making and thorough pretransplant evaluation. Obesity, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, smoking, and frailty are some of the conditions that need to be addressed before acceptance on the transplant list, and ideally before dialysis becoming imminent. This review offers insights into selection of pancreas/islet transplant candidates by transplant centers and an update on posttransplant outcomes, which may have practice implications for referring nephrologists.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donadores Vivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Salud Global , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Morbilidad/tendencias , Trasplante HomólogoRESUMEN
Due to an increasing scarcity of pancreases with optimal donor characteristics, islet isolation centers utilize pancreases from extended criteria donors, such as from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, which are particularly susceptible to prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT). We hypothesized that hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) can safely increase CIT. Five human DCD pancreases were subjected to 6 h of oxygenated HMP. Perfusion parameters, apoptosis, and edema were measured prior to islet isolation. Five human DBD pancreases were evaluated after static cold storage (SCS). Islet viability, and in vitro and in vivo functionality in diabetic mice were analyzed. Islets were isolated from HMP pancreases after 13.4 h [12.9-14.5] CIT and after 9.2 h [6.5-12.5] CIT from SCS pancreases. Histological analysis of the pancreatic tissue showed that HMP did not induce edema nor apoptosis. Islets maintained >90% viable during culture, and an appropriate in vitro and in vivo function in mice was demonstrated after HMP. The current study design does not permit to demonstrate that oxygenated HMP allows for cold ischemia extension; however, the successful isolation of functional islets from discarded human DCD pancreases after performing 6 h of oxygenated HMP indicates that oxygenated HMP may be a useful technology for better preservation of pancreases.