Comparison of intraocular lens tilt after capsular sutured scleral fixation with capsular segments versus uneventful cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare intraocular lens (IOL) tilt between uneventful phacoemulsification with in-the-bag IOL implantation and sutured scleral fixation (SSF) of the lens bag with a capsular tension segment (type 6 D / Morcher) using a Sheimpflug camera. SETTING: Clinical Practice, Hospital. Barcelona and A Coruña, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative multicenter study. METHODS: IOL tilt was compared between patients who underwent sutured scleral fixation with a capsular tension segment in a single eye (SSF group, n = 15) with patients who underwent uneventful IOL implantation (control group, n = 12) that were matched by biometric measurements. Post-operative refractive accuracy of biometric formulas by means of mean absolute error (MAE) was also reported. All patients underwent a general ophthalmic evaluation, anterior segment photography, and postoperative optical biometry (Zeiss IOLMaster® 500). In addition, IOL tilt was measured with a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam R, Oculus Optikgerate Gmbh). RESULTS: Mean vertical tilt was similar in both groups (2.20+/-2.47° SSF vs 1.97 +/- 1.79° control; p = 0.836) but mean horizontal tilt tended to higher values in the SSF series (2.09 +/- 2.74° vs 0.94 +/- 1.17°; p = 0.139). Considering post-operative refractive error in diopters by MAE calculations, there was an underestimation of IOL power in the SSF group which was only statistically significant for Barrett Universal II (1.07 vs 0.32; p = 0.028) and Hill-RBF (0.95 vs 0.26; p = 0.024) formulas, but not for SRK/T (0.99 vs 0.42; p = 0.285) and Kane (0.96 vs 0.33; p = 0.083). CONCLUSION: Sutured scleral fixation of capsular tension segments in the presence of zonular instability does not seem to induce clinically significant IOL tilt compared to uneventful cataract extraction cases.

Confocal microscopy and histopathological examination of diffuse lamellar keratitis in an experimental animal model.

PURPOSE: To investigate the cell populations and structural alterations of the cornea in an experimental model of diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) using confocal microscopy and histopathology. METHODS: A corneal flap was cut in 22 eyes of 11 New Zealand rabbits and the stromal interface was exposed to balanced salt solution (BSS, BSS group) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin (5 mg/mL) (LPS 5 mg/mL group) and (3.5 mg/mL) (LPS 3.5 mg/mL group). Postoperatively, eyes were examined with a slit-lamp microscope (DLK grading) and confocal microscopy. Animals were sacrificed on day 3 (BSS group and LPS 5 mg/mL group) and day 4 (LPS 3.5 mg/mL group). Corneoscleral buttons were excised and processed for histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Seven eyes were excluded. Slit-lamp microscopy revealed no cellular infiltration in the BSS group (five eyes). In the LPS groups, all eyes developed DLK, with iritis only observed in grade III eyes. In the LPS 5 mg/mL group, four eyes had DLK grade III, with iritis in three eyes. In the LPS 3.5 mg/mL group, three eyes had grade II and three eyes had grade III with iritis. On confocal microscopy, the BSS group had no cellular infiltration. Dense accumulation of inflammatory cells at the interface was noted in both LPS groups. Histopathology in the BSS group had a normal appearance. In the LPS groups, an inflammatory infiltrate was present at the interface that consisted of three cell populations--eosinophils, neutrophils, and lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Lipopolysaccharide endotoxin induced DLK in all exposed eyes, with iritis in a considerable proportion of eyes. The infiltrate consisted of three cell populations. Confocal microscopy showed the infiltrate in all affected eyes. Histopathological and confocal microscopic findings correlated well with the clinical appearance.

Prophylactic perioperative antiviral therapy for LASIK in patients with inactive herpetic keratitis.

PURPOSE: To report the outcome of LASIK in patients with inactive herpetic keratitis in which perioperative antiviral prophylaxis was used to prevent the recurrence of ocular herpes. METHODS: We report an uncontrolled series of five patients with inactive herpetic keratitis for at least 1 year before surgery in whom LASIK was successfully performed. All patients showed normal topography, pachymetry, and corneal sensitivity with no central corneal scarring. Perioperative prophylaxis was used in each case with oral valacyclovir and topical acyclovir ointment. RESULTS: None of the eyes developed reactivation of herpetic keratitis during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that perioperative antiviral prophylaxis may protect the cornea from herpes simplex virus reactivation after LASIK.