Improving parent-child interactions in maltreating families with the Attachment Video-feedback Intervention: Parental childhood trauma as a moderator of treatment effects.

Research is demonstrating the effectiveness of attachment-based interventions for maltreating families. However, parents' own traumatic childhood experiences may interfere with treatment effects. The current study investigated in a sample of maltreating families whether effects of the Attachment Video-feedback Intervention (AVI) on parent-child interactive quality were moderated by parental childhood trauma. Families were randomized to receive AVI (n = 29) or a Psychoeducative intervention (PI; n = 19), or they were in anon-randomized comparison group (RS; n = 40). Parents filled out the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and videotapes of parent-child interactions were coded for interactive quality. Parents who received AVI showed improved parent-child interactive quality compared to parents in PI and RS groups. However, parents with more severe levels of childhood trauma showed less improvements. Future research should explore whether clinical attention with a specific focus on trauma would increase treatement effects.

Effectiveness of an attachment-based intervention for the assessment of parenting capacities in maltreating families: A randomized controlled trial.

Even though Parenting Capacity Assessments (PCAs) are essential for child protection services to support placement decisions for maltreating families, presently no evidence-based PCA protocols are available. In this randomized controlled trial, we tested the quality of an attachment-based PCA protocol based on Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). We recruited 56 parent-child dyads (Mage children = 3.48 years) in Dutch family residential clinics that conduct PCAs to support placement decisions. After pretest, families were randomized to receive the Regular Assessment Procedure (RAP) (n = 28), or an additional assessment based on VIPP-SD (n = 28). An immediate post-test and a 10-month follow-up were conducted. Multilevel models showed that therapists felt equally confident about their recommendations regarding child placement for both groups and that they equally often modified their initial placement recommendations. Moreover, children in the VIPP-SD group did not show fewer behavior problems and did not experience recurring child maltreatment less often than children in the RAP group. Thus, we found no evidence that PCAs incorporating the VIPP-SD protocol outperformed PCAs as usual. We discuss possible explanations why in the current study VIPP-SD did not seem to add to the quality of the RAP.

A pesar de que las Evaluaciones de Capacidad de Crianza (PCA) son esenciales para los servicios de protección al niño para apoyar las decisiones de dónde colocarlo por razones de familias maltratadoras, en el presente no se encuentran disponibles ningún protocolo PCA basado en la evidencia. En este ensayo controlado al azar, pusimos a prueba la calidad de un protocolo PCA basado en la afectividad para lo cual nos basamos en la Intervención de Video Informativo para promover una Crianza Positiva y Disciplina Sensible (VIPP-SD). Reclutamos 56 díadas de progenitor-niño (edad promedio de los niños = 3.48 años) en clínicas residenciales de familias holandesas que utilizan las PCA para apoyar las decisiones de dónde colocar. Después del pre-examen, las familias fueron asignadas al azar para recibir el Procedimiento de Evaluación Regular (RAP) (n = 28), o una evaluación adicional basada en VIPP-SD (n = 28). Se llevaron a cabo un examen posterior inmediato y un seguimiento a los 10 meses. Los modelos de niveles múltiples mostraron que los terapeutas se sintieron igualmente confiados acerca de sus recomendaciones con respecto a dónde colocar al niño en ambos grupos y que ellos igualmente modificaron a menudo su recomendación inicial de dónde colocarlo. Es más, los niños en el grupo VIPP-SD no mostraron menos problemas de conducta y no experimentaron maltrato infantil recurrente menos a menudo que los niños en el grupo RAP. Por tanto, no encontramos evidencia de que las PCA que incorporan el protocolo VIPP-SD tuvieran mejores resultados que las PCA en su forma usual. Discutimos posibles explicaciones de por qué en el presente estudio los VIPP-SD no parecieron agregar nada a la calidad de RAP.

Contexte: Des interventions favorables et ciblées pour les familles sont nécessaires afin d'optimiser l'ajustement parental et la relation parent-bébé conformément à un diagnostic précédant de risque neurodéveloppemental pour les bébés. Buts: Le but de cette revue systématique était de déterminer l'efficacité des interventions pour l'amélioration de l'ajustement psychologique et le bien-être pour les parents ayant un bébé ayant été diagnostiqué comme ayant ou étant à risque d'avoir un trouble neurodéveloppemental. Méthodes: La stratégie de recherche du Cochrane Review Group a été suivie avec une recherche des essais contrôlés du Registre Cochrane Central, de PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, et Embase entre juillet et décembre 2017. La qualité méthodologique des articles inclus a été évaluée au moyen de l'échelle de la base de données de preuve de physiothérapie (PEDro Physiotherapy Evidence Database) par deux évaluateurs indépendants. Résultats: Douze études ont rempli les critères d'inclusion. Un petit nombre d'essais de grande qualité ont révélé une efficacité modérée à importante de la réduction chez les parents de symptômes psychologiques indésirables de trauma et de stress des parents. Des améliorations importantes dans les symptômes de dépression et d'anxiété ont émergé lors de follow up post intervention à plus long terme (6 mois-8 ans). Conclusions: On constate un soutien prometteur pour l'efficacité de certaines interventions à réduire les symptômes psychologiques de mésadaptation chez les parents avec des bébés diagnostiqués comme étant à risque d'un trouble neurodéveloppemental. D'autres ECR de qualité d'intervention psychologiques portant sur les conditions plus grandes de risque neurodéveloppemental sont nécessaires.

Testing an attachment- and trauma-informed intervention approach for parents and young children after interparental violence: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Interparental violence has persistent adverse effects on victimized parents and children. Young children, including infants and toddlers, are at particular risk to develop long-lasting negative outcomes, and yet specific evidence on effective intervention approaches for this vulnerable group is still lacking. This study will test the effectiveness of an attachment- and trauma-informed intervention approach in a sample of parent-child dyads who have experienced severe interparental violence. We test the individual and combined effects of two interventions: (1) "Nederlandse Interventie Kortdurend op Atypisch oudergedrag" (NIKA; Dutch, short-term intervention focused on atypical parenting behavior) aimed at improving the attachment relationship and (2) eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy aimed at reducing parental post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. METHODS: This study uses a multicenter randomized controlled design across multiple domestic violence shelters in the Netherlands. We aim to recruit 150 parent-child dyads with children aged between 0.5 and 6 years old. The study design consists of two phases. During the first phase for testing the effect of NIKA only, eligible dyads are randomly allocated to either NIKA or a waitlist usual care group. A pre-test is conducted prior to the treatment period and a post-test takes place directly afterwards (6 weeks after the pre-test). Phase 2 follows directly for testing the effects of EMDR and the combination of NIKA and EMDR. Parents who report clinical PTSD symptoms are randomly allocated to either EMDR therapy or a waitlist usual care group. Parents who do not report clinical PTSD symptoms only receive care as usual. Six weeks later, a post-test of phase 2 is conducted for all participating dyads. Primary study outcomes are disrupted parenting behavior, sensitive parenting behavior, and parental PTSD symptoms. Secondary study outcomes include PTSD symptoms and behavioral and emotional problems of the child. DISCUSSION: This study will inform and enhance the clinical field by providing new insights regarding effective treatment combinations for traumatized parents and their young children after interparental violence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL9179 . Registered 7 January 2021.