Intermediate-term survival of robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is the recommended treatment in non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In randomised trials, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) showed non-inferior short-term oncological outcomes compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC). Data on intermediate and long-term oncological outcomes of RARC are limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the intermediate-term overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with MIBC and high-risk non-MIBC (NMIBC) who underwent ORC versus RARC in clinical practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A nationwide retrospective study in 19 Dutch hospitals including patients with MIBC and high-risk NMIBC treated by ORC (n = 1086) or RARC (n = 386) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2015. Primary and secondary outcome measures were median OS and RFS, respectively. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A multivariable Cox regression model was developed to adjust for possible confounders and to assess prognostic factors for survival including clinical variables, clinical and pathological disease stage, neoadjuvant therapy and surgical margin status. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval ([95%CI] 5.0-5.2). The median OS after ORC was 5.0 years (95%CI 4.3-5.6) versus 5.8 years after RARC (95%CI 5.1-6.5). The median RFS was 3.8 years (95%CI 3.1-4.5) after ORC versus 5.0 years after RARC (95%CI 3.9-6.0). After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.00 (95%CI 0.84-1.20) and for RFS 1.08 (95%CI 0.91-1.27) of ORC versus RARC. Patients who underwent ORC were older, had higher preoperative serum creatinine levels and more advanced clinical and pathological disease stage. CONCLUSION: ORC and RARC resulted in similar intermediate-term OS and RFS in a cohort of almost 1500 MIBC and high-risk NMIBC.

Tumour-free margins in vulvar squamous cell carcinoma: Does distance really matter?

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the width of tumour-free margins after surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Most current guidelines recommend tumour-free margins of ≥8 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a margin of <8 mm is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in VSCC. METHODS: A meta-analysis of the available literature and a cohort study of 148 VSCC patients seen at a referral centre from 2000 to 2012 was performed. The primary end-point of the cohort study was a histologically confirmed ipsilateral local recurrence within 2 years after primary treatment in relation to the margin distance. RESULTS: Based on 10 studies, the meta-analysis showed that a tumour-free margin of <8 mm is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence compared to a tumour-free margin of ≥8 mm (pooled risk ratio, 1.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.13-3.51], p = 0.02). In the cohort study, we found no clear difference in the risk of local recurrence in the <8 versus ≥8 mm group; however, 40% of the patients in the <8 mm group received additional treatment. Tumour-positive margin was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% CI: 0.08-0.55]). CONCLUSIONS: This work provides important data to question the commonly used 8-mm margin as a prognosticator for local recurrence. More research is needed to address the question of whether additional treatment improves the prognosis in patients with a tumour-free margin of <8 mm.