Orientation of the Scapula in the Standing Position.

OBJECTIVES: A new ultrasound-based device is proposed to non-invasively measure the orientation of the scapula in the standing position to consider this parameter for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of this device. METHODS: Accuracy was assessed by comparing measurements made with the ultrasound device to those acquired with a three-dimensional (3D) optical localization system (Northern Digital, Canada) on a dedicated mechanical phantom. Three users performed 10 measurements on three healthy volunteers with different body mass (BMI) indices to analyze the reliability of the device by measuring the intra and interobserver variabilities. RESULTS: The mean accuracy of the device was 0.9°± 0.7 (0.01-3.03), 1.3°± 0.8 (0.03-4.55), 1.9°± 1.5 (0.05-5.76), respectively, in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The interobserver and intraobserver variabilities were excellent whatever the BMI and the users experience. CONCLUSIONS: The device is accurate and reliable enough for the measurement of the scapula orientation in the standing position.

MRI-based navigated cryosurgery of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors using skin fiducial markers: a case series of 15 cases.

BACKGROUND: Precision surgery is becoming increasingly important in the field of Orthopaedic Oncology. Image-guided percutaneous cryosurgery (CRA) has emerged as a valid treatment modality for extra-abdominal desmoid tumors (EDTs). To date, most CRA procedures use CT-based guidance which fails to properly characterize tumor segments. Computer-guided MRI navigation can address this issue however, the lack of a fixed landmark for registration remains a challenge. Successful CRA correlates directly with precision approaches facilitated by intraoperative imaging guidance. This is the first study that attempts to assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel approach of using skin fiducial markers to overcome the challenge of a MRI-based navigation CRA for symptomatic or progressive EDTs. METHODS: In this retrospective study conducted between 2018 and 2020, 11 patients at a single center with symptomatic or progressive EDTs were treated with CRA using intraoperative MRI navigation. Fifteen cryosurgery procedures were performed, each adhering to a personalized pre-operative plan. Total tumor size, viable and non-viable portions pre- and post-operation, and SF-36 questionnaire evaluating subjective health were recorded. RESULTS: All CRAs demonstrated 100% adherence to the predetermined plan. Overall, tumor size decreased Median= -56.9% [-25.6, -72.4]) with a reduction in viable tissue, (Median= -80.4% [-53.3, -95.2]). Four patients required additional CRAs. Only one patient's tumor did not reduce in size. One patient suffered from local muscle necrosis. Pre-operation, the average physical and mental scores 41.6 [29.4, 43] and 26.3 [17.6, 40.9] respectively. Post-operation, the average physical and mental scores were 53.4[38, 59.7] and 38 [31.2, 52.7] respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings provide an early indication of the feasibility and efficacy of performing percutaneous cryosurgery using skin fiducial marker registration for MRI-computed navigation to treat EDTs safely. Larger cohorts and multicenter evaluations are needed to determine the efficacy of this technique.

Validation of the distal filling ratio in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographic stress shielding is a common finding in uncemented convertible short-stem shoulder arthroplasty (UCSSSA). The distal filling ratio (DFR) has been described as a predictor for the occurrence of stress shielding. A DFR > 70% was mentioned as a risk factor for the occurrence of stress shielding for some UCSSSA. However, measurements were only performed on conventional radiographs and no validation exists for 3D automated planning tools. METHODS: DFR was manually measured on postoperative true ap radiographs of 76 shoulder arthroplasties using a standardized protocol and were compared to preoperative CT scans with an automated calculation of the DFR after virtual implantation of the stem. RESULTS: The mean DFR measured on X-rays was 75.9% (SD = 8.7; 95% CI = 74-78) vs. 78.9% (SD = 9.1; 95% CI = 76.8-83) automatically measured on CT scans. This difference was significant (p < 0.001). In 7 out of 76 cases (9%) the difference between manual measurement on radiographs and computerized measurement on CT scans was > 10%. CONCLUSION: Manual measurement of the DFR is underestimated on conventional radiographs compared to automated calculation on CT scans be a mean of 3%. Therefore, automated measurement of the DFR on CT scans seems to be beneficial, especially in cases with osteopenic cortices. Manual measurement of the DFR on conventional ap radiographs in cases without CT scans, however, is still a viable alternative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective study.

Stem size prediction in shoulder arthroplasty with preoperative 3D planning.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional surgical planning software provides virtual reconstructions of the shoulder with automated joint indices for a preoperative case assessment. The aim of this single center study was to evaluate the concordance between the preoperatively selected humeral components and the final implants used in shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: 129 cases who had undergone anatomic (n = 16) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 117) using the same type of uncemented short stem implant and were included for review in this study. The type of arthroplasty, stem size, stem inclination, tray-offset and liner-thickness were noted preoperatively and compared to the final implant specifications used in surgery. RESULTS: The type of arthroplasty matched the surgical plan in 99.2% of cases, as one case was converted from RSA to TSA. The concordance of planned to implanted stem size was 44.2% and the planned size was in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Stem inclination in TSA matched the surgical plan in 50% of cases. Tray offset in RSA was predicted correctly in 65% and liner-thickness matched the surgical plan in 98.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Despite a low degree of concordance of planned to implanted stem sizes of 44.2%, the choice of stem size was found to be in range of one adjacent size in 87.6% of cases. Further investigations of other contributing factors are necessary to increase the accuracy of the preoperative selection of humeral implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: level IV, retrospective case study.

Accuracy of a digital workflow for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: comparison of planned and actual outcomes.

AIM: The aim of the present prospective proof-of-concept study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3D orthognathic surgical planning and CAD/CAM splints by comparing planned with actual postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients scheduled for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery to correct a skeletal Class III dentofacial deformity were recruited. All subjects had CBCT scans taken not more than 2 months preoperatively and within the 1-week postoperative period. The distance between six dental landmarks (midpoint of the maxillary and mandibular incisors, mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary and mandibular first molars) and three intersecting symmetry planes (Frankfort horizontal plane [FHP], midsagittal plane [MSP], and coronal plane [CP]) were measured, and the differences between the virtually simulated and actual postoperative models were computed. The threshold for accuracy was set at 2 mm. RESULTS: Differences between the planned and actual outcomes were analyzed via chi-square tests and two-tailed paired student t tests. The overall mean linear difference for all six landmarks was 0.98 mm. The overall mean linear differences for both maxillary and mandibular landmarks relative to the FHP, MSP, and CP were 1.3, 0.7, and 0.9 mm, respectively. Four cases showed all linear differences of the six landmarks to be < 2.0 mm, while the other six cases had at least one linear difference of > 2.0 mm, the majority of which were in the superior-inferior direction. There were statistically significantly greater inaccuracies in the FHP compared with the MSP and CP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Most of the linear differences between the simulated and actual outcomes were clinically acceptable. However, greater linear differences were seen in the superior-inferior direction, indicating a greater surgical error in achieving the desired vertical position of the maxillomandibular complex. (Int J Comput Dent 2022;25(4):397-0; doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2599749).

Three-Dimensional Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation for the Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

Background and Objectives: Three-dimensional planning and guided osteotomy utilizing patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) with the contralateral side used as a reference have been proven as effective in the treatment of malunions following complex fractures of the distal radius. However, this approach has not yet been described in relation to fracture reduction of the distal radius. The aim of this study was to assess the technical and logistical feasibility of computer-assisted surgery in a clinical setting using PSI for fracture reduction and fixation. Materials and Methods: Five patients with varied fracture patterns of the distal radius underwent operative treatment with using PSI. The first applied PSI guide allowed specific and accurate placement of Kirschner wires inside the multiple fragments, with subsequent concurrent reduction using a second guide. Results: Planning, printing of the guides, and operations were performed within 5.6 days on average (range of 1-10 days). All patients could be treated within a reasonable period of time, demonstrating good outcomes, and were able to return to work after a follow-up of three months. Mean wrist movements (°) were 58 (standard deviation (SD) 21) in flexion, 62 (SD 15) in extension, 73 (SD 4) in pronation and 74 (SD 10) in supination at a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: Three-dimensional planned osteosynthesis using PSI for treatment of distal radius fractures is feasible and facilitates reduction of multiple fracture fragments. However, higher costs must be taken into consideration for this treatment.

[3D planning : from carcinological resection to maxillofacial reconstruction]. / La médecine du futur. Planification 3D : de la résection carcinologique à la reconstruction maxillo-faciale.

The use of new technologies in medicine becomes more and more frequent because they allow us to raise therapeutic quality. This is the case in maxillofacial surgery. 3D planning for oncological resection and reconstruction brings many benefits. In this article, we will present the first case operated with this technology at CHU Liege and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this technique.

L'utilisation des nouvelles technologies en médecine devient de plus en plus fréquente car elles permettent d'augmenter la qualité thérapeutique. C'est le cas dans le domaine de la chirurgie maxillo-faciale. La planification 3D des chirurgies de résection oncologique et de reconstruction apporte de nombreux bénéfices. Dans cet article, nous vous présentons le premier cas opéré grâce à cette technologie au sein du CHU Liège et discutons des avantages et inconvénients de cette technique.

Does computerized CT-based 3D planning of the humeral head cut help to restore the anatomy of the proximal humerus after stemless total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Restoration of proximal humeral anatomy (RPHA) after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has been shown to result in better clinical outcomes than is the case in nonanatomic humeral reconstruction. Preoperative virtual planning has mainly focused on glenoid component placement. Such planning also has the potential to improve anatomic positioning of the humeral head by more accurately guiding the humeral head cut and aid in the selection of anatomic humeral component sizing. It was hypothesized that the use of preoperative 3-dimensional (3D) planning helps to reliably achieve RPHA after stemless TSA. METHODS: One hundred consecutive stemless TSA (67 males, 51 right shoulder, mean age of 62 ±9.4 years) were radiographically assessed using pre- and postoperative standardized anteroposterior radiographs. The RPHA was measured with the so-called circle method described by Youderian et al. We measured deviation from the premorbid center of rotation (COR), and more than 3 mm was considered as minimal clinically important difference. Additionally, pre- and postoperative humeral head diameter (HHD), head-neck angle (HNA), and humeral head height (HHH) were measured to assess additional geometrical risk factors for poor RPHA. RESULTS: The mean distance from of the premorbid to the implanted head COR was 4.3 ± 3.1 mm. Thirty-five shoulders (35%) showed a deviation of less than 3 mm (mean 1.9 ±1.1) and 65 shoulders (65%) a deviation of ≥3 mm (mean 8.0 ± 3.7). Overstuffing was the main reason for poor RPHA (88%). The level of the humeral head cut was responsible for overstuffing in 46 of the 57 overstuffed cases. The preoperative HHD, HHH, and HNA were significantly larger, higher, and more in valgus angulation in the group with accurate RPHA compared with the group with poor RPHA (HHD of 61.1 mm ± 4.4 vs. 55.9 ± 6.6, P < .001; HHH 8.6±2.2 vs. 7.6±2.6, P = .026; and varus angulation of 134.7° ±6.4° vs. 131.0° ±7.91, P = .010). CONCLUSION: Restoration of proximal humeral anatomy after stemless TSA using computed tomography (CT)-based 3D planning was not precise. A poorly performed humeral head cut was the main reason for overstuffing, which was seen in 88% of the cases with inaccurate RPHA. Preoperative small HHD, low HHH, and varus-angulated HNA are risk factors for poor RPHA after stemless TSA.

Simulation in shoulder arthroplasty education using three-dimensional planning software: the role of guidelines and predicted range of motion.

AIM: To demonstrate how reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) planning software could be used to improve how the trainees position glenoid and humeral implants and obtain optimal simulated range of motion (ROM). METHODS: We selected four groups of five various level participants: medical student (MS), junior resident (JR), senior resident (SR), and shoulder expert (SE). Thereafter, the 20 participants planned five cases of arthritic shoulders for a RSA on a validated planning software following three phases: (1) no guidelines and no ROM feedback, (2) guidelines but no ROM feedback, and (3) guidelines and ROM feedback. We evaluated the final simulated impingement-free ROM, the choice of the implant (baseplate size, graft, glenosphere), and the glenoid implant positioning. RESULTS: MS planning were significantly improved by the ROM feedback only. JR took the best advantage of both guidelines and ROM in final results. SR planning were less performant than SE into phase 1 regarding flexion, external rotation, and adduction (respectively - 10°, p = 0.03; - 11°, p = 0.003; and - 3°, p = 0,03), but reached similar results into phase 3 (respectively - 2°, p = 0.329; - 4°, p = 0.44; - 2°, p = 0.319). For MS, JR, and SR, we observed a systematic improvement in the agreement over the study course. The glenoid diameter remained highly variable even for SE. Comparing glenoid implant position to SE, the distance error decreased with advancing phases. CONCLUSION: Planning software can be used as a simulation training tool to improve implant positioning in shoulder arthroplasty procedures.

An Innovative Weightbearing Device for Weightbearing 3-Dimensional Imaging for Foot and Ankle Surgery Preoperative Planning.

Three-dimensional preoperative planning has demonstrated multiple surgical advantages. Currently, we cannot carry out preoperative 3-dimensional planning of foot and ankle orthopedics in most hospitals due to the impossibility of performing weightbearing CT imaging. Our objective is to describe and evaluate an innovative accessible, simple, and effective device that simulates standing while in a supine position, to obtain 3-dimensional images supporting bodyweight load with a conventional CT machine. From a group of 30 volunteers, 10 patients were randomly selected and pressure and its distribution were analyzed while in a standing position in both feet. Differences between both feet were considered normal intrapersonal variability. Subsequently, the right footprint of the same 10 subjects was evaluated in the proposed loading device. Then, their pressures and distribution were compared with respect to standing and with respect to intrapersonal variability. The mean total standing pressure was 93 Kpa (standard deviation [SD] 14.32), which was reduced to 81.95 Kpa (SD 19.54) in the loading device. The load device reduced the pressure by a mean of16% (SD 22% (range -25% to -0.03%). At the hindfoot level, the loading device increased pressure by a mean of 20.59 Kpa, which expressed percentage implies an increase of 14% compared to standing. Due to its easy construction and effectiveness, this is the first device that opens the door of foot and ankle orthopedics in any hospital to 3D preoperative planning and the benefits derived from it.

[3D-assisted mandibular reconstruction: A technical note of fibula free flap with preshaped titanium plate]. / Reconstruction mandibulaire par lambeau fibulaire : note technique de pré-conformation de plaques d'ostéosynthèse assistée en 3D.

The purpose of this technical note is to illustrate a simple and economical preoperative method for preshaping a reconstructive titanium plate in a fibula free flap (FFF) by using 3D printing of a virtually reconstructed mandible haptic model. The whole process consisted in creating a 3D model of the patient's mandible based on a CT-scan using a combination of free software (3Dslicer and ITK-snap), and simulating the surgical osteotomies and reconstruction, and print it as a guide for bending a reconstruction titanium plate. Reconstruction is performed using virtual cubes (1 to 3 cubes, according the number of FFF osteotomies). This virtual lab work is performed using 3D Builder® (Microsoft, Redmond) software. This technique allows obtaining an optimal plate application on the bony fragments. It facilitates reconstructive surgery with good functional (putting the patient back in an optimal dental occlusion based on the native maxilla) and aesthetic results. This technical note presents a simple and economical preoperative fabrication of a reconstructive plate through freeware and a low-cost 3D printer accessible to all surgeons.

Three-dimensional cephalometry for orthognathic planning: Normative data and analyses.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to create a normative database of 3D cephalometric measurements for adult Chinese in Taiwan to understand the specific features, as well as to provide information for 3-dimensional (3D) orthognathic surgery planning for patients with maxillofacial deformity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 30 male and 30 female adults with normal and balanced facial appearance, skeletal Class I pattern, and proper interincisal relationship with normal occlusion. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed. After standard orientation of the 3D image models, 51 landmarks were digitized and 3D cephalometric measurements of overall facial features, midface, maxilla, mandible, dentoalveolus, and soft tissue were performed and analyzed. RESULTS: Reliability and reproducibility of the 3D measurement were achieved. The data showed significant differences between males and females in facial height ratio, midface prominence, midface and maxilla width, mandible width and length for the skeleton, lower incisal inclination and interincisal angle for the dentoalveolus, and lip height, facial height and chin throat angle for the soft tissue. These dataset presented specific facial characteristics of the Chinese face as compared with other populations. CONCLUSION: The normative data helps to serve as a guide for maxillofacial treatment for globally ethnic Chinese, particularly useful for orthodontic treatment, 3D planning of orthognathic surgery and outcome assessment. Gender and ethnic differences need to be taken into consideration.

Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative navigation for shoulder arthroplasty has recently gained interest because of the potential to enhance the surgeon's understanding of glenoid anatomy and improve the accuracy of glenoid component positioning. The purpose of our study was to assess the impact of preoperative 3D planning on the surgeon's selection of the glenoid component (standard vs. augmented) and compare duration of surgery with and without intraoperative navigation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 200 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty. The first group of 100 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty using standard 2D preoperative planning based on standard radiographs and computed tomographic scans. The second group of 100 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty using 3D preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation. Type of glenoid component and operative time were recorded in each case. RESULTS: For the group of patients with standard preoperative planning, only 15 augmented glenoid components were used, whereas in the group of patients with 3D preoperative planning and navigation, 54 augments were used (P < .001). The operative time was 11 minutes longer for the procedures that used intraoperative navigation, compared with those that did not (P < .001). This difference diminished as the surgeon became more proficient with the navigation technique. CONCLUSION: Use of preoperative 3D planning changes the surgeon's understanding of the patient's glenoid anatomy. In our study, using 3D planning increased the likelihood that the surgeon selected an augmented glenoid component compared with 2D planning. Intraoperative navigation slightly lengthened the duration of surgery, but this became insignificant as part of a learning curve within 6 months.

Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative 3D planning programs for anatomic (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) allow the analysis of glenohumeral joint pathoanatomy and templating for implant size selection and placement. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare the preoperative glenoid implant type and size planned to the final glenoid implant type and size used intraoperatively. METHODS: Two hundred patients (100 TSA and 100 RSA) with a mean age of 72 years who had undergone preoperative planning and subsequent shoulder arthroplasty (100 TSA and 100 RSA) were included. All preoperative plans were saved and were analyzed for arthroplasty type (TSA vs. RSA), implant type (augment vs. nonaugment), and size (ie, polyethylene size, polyethylene radius of curvature, glenoid baseplate diameter, baseplate post length, and baseplate lateralization). The preoperative plan was available during surgery and was compared to the final implants inserted by the surgeon. RESULTS: There were no intraoperative conversions of TSA to RSA or vice versa. In patients planned for a TSA, complete concordance between the preoperative plan and final implant selection was 85%. A complete mismatch for TSA glenoid size, backside radius of curvature, and augmentation occurred in 2%. For RSA, complete concordance was found in 90% of cases. A complete mismatch for implant type, size, post length, and glenosphere size occurred in 3%. CONCLUSION: A high concordance was found between preoperative 3D planning implant selection and the glenoid component inserted at surgery for TSA and RSA. This high concordance may assist with surgical preparedness, implant stocks, and possibly future implant production.

Midface Reconstruction: Planning and Outcome.

Reconstruction of the complex anatomy and aesthetics of the midface is often a challenge. A careful understanding of this three-dimensional (3D) structure is necessary. Anticipating the extent of excision and its planning following oncological resections is critical. In the past over two decades, with the advances in microsurgical procedures, contributions toward the reconstruction of this area have generated interest. Planning using digital imaging, 3D printed models, osseointegrated implants, and low-profile plates, has favorably impacted the outcome. However, there are still controversies in the management: to use single composite tissues versus multiple tissues; implants versus autografts; vascularized versus nonvascularized bone; prosthesis versus reconstruction. This article explores the present available options in maxillary reconstruction and outlines the approach in the management garnered from past publications and experiences.

Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Incorrect positioning of components during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) increases the risk of pain, instability, and early revision. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D planning-assisted and a conventional system for TKA positioning. We hypothesized that the use of three-dimensional CT-scan planning and custom cutting guides would increase the accuracy of component positioning. METHODS: A randomized, controlled, prospective study of two groups was performed. In one group, patient-specific custom cutting guides (PSCG) were used for component positioning based on 3D CT-scan planning. In the control group, TKA was performed with a conventional ancillary system. The components' positioning angles were measured on 3D reconstructions. The main evaluation criterion was the percentage of outliers outside of a target zone of ± 3° for the coronal positioning of the femoral component. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. The percentage of outliers for the femoral component was significantly lower in the 3D-guided group (1 patient) compared to the control group (7 patients p = 0.02). The coronal femoral angle was restored with greater accuracy in the 3D-assisted group (- 0.1° ± 1.4°) compared to the control group (1.6° ± 2.5°). Surgery was significantly shorter in the 3D group. The clinical outcomes were better in the 3D group at the two year follow-up with fewer failures and a lower standard deviation in IKS scores. CONCLUSION: The use of a 3D planning and custom guides can improve TKA component positioning by increasing the accuracy of implants alignment and reducing the percentage of outliers. The same benefit was not demonstrated for the global knee alignment and the clinical scores with no indisputable clinical advantage for the PSCG.

Virtual 3D planning of tracheostomy placement and clinical applicability of 3D cannula design: a three-step study.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the potential of 3D virtual planning of tracheostomy tube placement and 3D cannula design to prevent tracheostomy complications due to inadequate cannula position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D models of commercially available cannula were positioned in 3D models of the airway. In study (1), a cohort that underwent tracheostomy between 2013 and 2015 was selected (n = 26). The cannula was virtually placed in the airway in the pre-operative CT scan and its position was compared to the cannula position on post-operative CT scans. In study (2), a cohort with neuromuscular disease (n = 14) was analyzed. Virtual cannula placing was performed in CT scans and tested if problems could be anticipated. Finally (3), for a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and complications of conventional tracheostomy cannula, a patient-specific cannula was 3D designed, fabricated, and placed. RESULTS: (1) The 3D planned and post-operative tracheostomy position differed significantly. (2) Three groups of patients were identified: (A) normal anatomy; (B) abnormal anatomy, commercially available cannula fits; and (C) abnormal anatomy, custom-made cannula, may be necessary. (3) The position of the custom-designed cannula was optimal and the trachea healed. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual planning of the tracheostomy did not correlate with actual cannula position. Identifying patients with abnormal airway anatomy in whom commercially available cannula cannot be optimally positioned is advantageous. Patient-specific cannula design based on 3D virtualization of the airway was beneficial in a patient with abnormal airway anatomy.

Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Glenoid loosening after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is influenced by the position of the glenoid component. 3D planning software and patient-specific guides seem to improve positioning accuracy, but their respective individual application and role are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of freehand implantation after 3D pre-operative planning and to compare its accuracy to that of a targeting guide. METHOD: Seventeen patients scheduled for TSA for primary glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in this prospective study. Every patient had pre-operative planning, based on a CT scan. Glenoid component implantation was performed freehand, guided by 3D views displayed in the operating room. The position of the glenoid component was determined by manual segmentation of post-operative CT scans and compared to the planned position. The results were compared to those obtained in a previous work with the use of a patient-specific guide. RESULTS: The mean error for the central point was 2.89 mm (SD ± 1.36) with the freehand method versus 2.1 mm (SD ± 0.86) with use of a targeting guide (p = 0.05). The observed difference was more significant (p = 0.03) for more severely retroverted glenoids (> 10°). The mean errors for version and inclination were respectively 4.82° (SD ± 3.12) and 4.2° (SD ± 2.14) with freehand method, compared to 4.87° (SD ± 3.61) and 4.39° (SD ± 3.36) with a targeting guide (p = 0.97 and 0.85, respectively). CONCLUSION: 3D pre-operative planning allowed accurate glenoid component positioning with a freehand method. Compared to the freehand method, patient-specific guides slightly improved the position of the central point, especially for severely retroverted glenoids, but not the orientation of the component.

Tumor resection at the pelvis using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas are associated with a relatively high local recurrence rate of around 30 % in the pelvis. Inadequate surgical margins are the most important reason. However, obtaining adequate margins is particularly difficult in this anatomically demanding region. Recently, three-dimensional (3-D) planning, printed models, and patient-specific instruments (PSI) with cutting blocks have been introduced to improve the precision during surgical tumor resection. This case series illustrates these modern 3-D tools in pelvic tumor surgery. METHODS: The first consecutive patients with 3-D-planned tumor resection around the pelvis were included in this retrospective study at a University Hospital in 2015. Detailed information about the clinical presentation, imaging techniques, preoperative planning, intraoperative surgical procedures, and postoperative evaluation is provided for each case. The primary outcome was tumor-free resection margins as assessed by a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the specimen. The secondary outcomes were precision of preoperative planning and complications. RESULTS: Four patients with pelvic sarcomas were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 7.8 (range, 6.0-9.0) months. The combined use of preoperative planning with 3-D techniques, 3-D-printed models, and PSI for osteotomies led to higher precision (maximal (max) error of 0.4 centimeters (cm)) than conventional 3-D planning and freehand osteotomies (max error of 2.8 cm). Tumor-free margins were obtained where measurable (n = 3; margins were not assessable in a patient with curettage). Two insufficiency fractures were noted postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional planning as well as the intraoperative use of 3-D-printed models and PSI are valuable for complex sarcoma resection at the pelvis. Three-dimensionally printed models of the patient anatomy may help visualization and precision. PSI with cutting blocks help perform very precise osteotomies for adequate resection margins.

Preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of total hip arthroplasty that takes combined anteversion.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether postoperative combined anteversion (CA) can be kept within the safe zone while using cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the operative technique which prepares the socket first for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), by estimating the anteversion of the metaphyseal fit stem using preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computerized planning and by adjusting the anteversion of the socket using a navigation system that considers CA. Our subjects were 65 patients (65 hips) that had undergone cementless THA for DDH that could be observed for 1 year or more. Clinical assessments were made using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association's (JOA) hip score. For a radiological evaluation, we investigated 3D-planned stem versions, postoperative stem versions, preoperative and postoperative CA, and the relationship between CA and dislocation tendencies with temporary intraoperative reductions. JOA hip scores improved from 52.3 ± 11.4 points to 88.9 ± 8.6 points. CT evaluations revealed that 3D-planned stem versions were strongly correlated with postoperative stem versions (r = 0.80; p < 0.01). Preoperative CA was 50.5° ± 7.2°, and postoperative CA was 41.3° ± 8.6°. Postoperative CA was kept within the safe zone in 61 hips. No intraoperative dislocation tendencies were observed in any hips. By estimating the anteversion of the cementless metaphyseal fit stem using 3D planning preoperatively and adjusting the angle of anteversion of the socket using a navigation system that considers CA intraoperatively, postoperative CA can very frequently be kept within the safe zone, even with cementless THA using the operative technique which prepares the socket first for DDH.