Reply to: "Invited Discussion on: Video Assisted Septo-Rhinoplasty, the Future of Endonasal Rhinoplasty-a Technical Note".

We respond to Gryskiewic and Alameddine's commentary on our recent study regarding endoscopic use in rhinoplasty. Highlighting the context-dependent nature of technique superiority, we discuss the alternative approach of Video Assisted Rhinoseptoplasty (VARS) in mitigating visible scarring concerns. Additionally, we emphasize the benefits of comparing closed procedures with and without endoscopic assistance, underscoring the advantages of optical utilization. Our perspective on nasal tip surgery advocates for enlarged marginal incisions to facilitate direct visual control, complementing our approach. Addressing concerns on the learning curve, we share insights from our training experience, stressing the feasibility of achieving proficiency with practice. Lastly, we acknowledge the need for surgical flexibility, particularly in cases of cartilaginous weakness, where alternative strategies like spreader grafts may be considered. Our response contributes to advancing rhinoplasty techniques, promoting context-driven approaches and adaptability for optimized outcomes.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

[Standard rhinoplasty]. / Rhinoplastie standard de réduction.

Most patients who consult a surgeon for rhinoplasty do not want a radical change in their nose. They seek a reduction in the volume of the nasal pyramid and correction of a precise element that they judge to be ungainly--most often an osteocartilaginous hump. The procedure that we qualify as "standard" will eliminate the osteocartilaginous hump, decrease the dimensions of the septum and reduce the size of the alar crus of the alar cartilage. Although the required technical maneuvers are simple, their sequence must be coherent with a few basic rules that are simple but rarely explained in order to avoid defects linked to excessive, or on the contrary, insufficient corrections.

[The short nose]. / Le nez court.

Short noses are not only depending on the length of the dorsum, but also if there is a saddle deformity, or a too lower situation of the fronto-nasal angle, or an open naso-labial angle or a rim retraction. All the cases are treated, often with the help of cartilage grafts and with a closed approach.

[Surgical approaches in rhinoplasty]. / Voies d'abord en rhinoplastie.

In the first step of rhinoplasty, the surgical approach will expose through different types of incisions and dissection planes the osteocartilaginous framework of the nasal pyramid prior to performing actions to reduce or increase the latter. This exposure can be performed by a closed approach or by an external approach--the choice depends on the type of nose and the habits of the surgeon. Far from being opposites, closed and external approaches are complementary and should be known and mastered by surgeons performing rhinoplasty.

Closed Rhinoplasty: A Single Surgeon Experience of 238 Cases over 2 Years.

Closed rhinoplasty is currently losing favour as a method of rhinoplasty reshaping procedure. Open rhinoplasties are usually performed by surgeons because of the greater degree of visualisation of the cartilages and bones within the nose that need to be reshaped. Because of the criticisms of closed rhinoplasty the senior author performed an audit of his outcomes to determine whether closed rhinoplasty still has a role to play in the armamentarium of the plastic surgeon. We conducted this study as a retrospective review of all closed rhinoplasty operations performed by a single surgeon over a two-year period (from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2017). The operative technique is provided. An independent panel of 3 assessors (2 board certified consultant plastic surgeons and one lay member of the public) rated outcomes of the closed technique based on photographic series. Statistical analysis was performed using Cohen's Kappa and Friedman test. Additionally, the length of follow up period, revision rates, and post-operative complications (general and aesthetic) were examined. A total of 242 cases of rhinoplasty were performed (8 open and 234 closed rhinoplasty; 225 primary and 17 revision operations). The first consultant surgeon gave a score in a range from 4.2/5 to 4.9/5 with a mode of 4.8 and a mean score of 4.7/5. The second consultant surgeon gave a range of 4.1/5 to 4.9/5 with a mode of 4.4 and mean score of 4.3/5. The lay panel member scored the cases in a range from 4.4/5 to 5/5 with a mode of 4.8 and a mean score of 4.9/5. Cohen's coefficient was 0.72 showing substantial agreement across the panel. The complication rate for the recorded data was 0.8% with two cases of soft tissue infection treated with oral antibiotics. The results of this paper advocates the benefits of the closed approach in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Surgeons should appreciate that both open and closed approaches are complimentary. The favouring of a single approach is indicated in the scenarios discussed. The remaining cases seem to produce equivocal results and the choice of procedure should be based on patient anatomy, outcome aims, and the ability of a surgeon to perform their preferred technique.

Punto interdomal en técnica cerrada / Interdomal suture in closed approach

El manejo de la punta nasal es un elemento clave en toda rinoplastía. Las primeras técnicas empleadas sacrificaban la estructura del arco alar con resultados posoperatorios indeseables. En la era moderna de la rinoplastía, el manejo de la punta nasal se enfocó en remodelar, preservar y reposicionar los cartílagos alares mediante el uso de suturas. El punto interdomal es una sutura en forma de ocho o loop simple desde la porción más anterior de un domo hacia el contralateral uniendo la región más alta de las cruras mediales. En el presente artículo se realiza una revisión del uso de puntos de suturas en el manejo de la punta nasal, se describen las características del punto interdomal en técnica cerrada y se muestran sus resultados en una serie de casos.

The nasal tip surgery is a key element in rhinoplasty. The first techniques employed sacrificed the alar arch structure with undesirable postoperative results. In the modern era of rhinoplasty, nasal tip surgery focused on reshaping, preserving and repositioning the alar cartilages using reversible sutures. The interdomal suture is a figure-eight or simple loop suture placed from the most anterior portion of one dome to the contralateral joining the highest region of the medial crura. This article reviews the use of suture techniques in nasal tip reshaping and describes the interdomal suture in closed approach and its results in a clinical series.