Concordance of immunohistochemistry for predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer between biopsy and surgical excision: a single-centre experience and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Accurate evaluation of breast cancer on bioptic samples is of fundamental importance to guide therapeutic decisions, especially in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting. We aimed to assess concordance for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), c-erbB2/HER2 and Ki-67. We also reviewed the current literature to evaluate our results in the context of the data available at present. METHODS: We included patients who underwent both biopsy and surgical resection for breast cancer at San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy, between January 2014 and December 2020. ER, PR, c-erbB2, and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry concordance between biopsy and surgical specimen was evaluated. ER was further analysed to include the recently defined ER-low-positive in our analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 923 patients. Concordance between biopsy and surgical specimen for ER, ER-low-positive, PR, c-erbB2 and Ki-67 was, respectively, 97.83, 47.8, 94.26, 68 and 86.13%. Cohen's κ for interobserver agreement was very good for ER and good for PR, c-erbB2 and Ki-67. Concordance was especially low (37%) in the c-erbB2 1 + category. CONCLUSION: Oestrogen and progesterone receptor status can be safely assessed on preoperative samples. The results of this study advise caution in interpreting biopsy results regarding ER-low-positive, c-erbB2/HER and Ki-67 results due to a still suboptimal concordance. The low concordance for c-erbB2 1 + cases underlines the importance of further training in this area, in the light of the future therapeutic perspectives.

Oestrogen receptor low positive breast cancer: associations with prognosis.

PURPOSE: In this study of oestrogen receptor (ER) Low Positive breast cancers (BC) in three large cohorts of BC patients, we assess associations between levels of ER expression and tumour characteristics and prognosis. METHODS: Cases were stratified into patients unlikely to have received adjuvant therapy according to treatment guidelines at time of diagnosis (before 1995), and those who could have received adjuvant therapy (diagnosed in 1995 or later). ER status was divided into < 1%; ≥ 1 < 10%; ≥ 10%. Results were correlated with time of diagnosis, histopathological grade, proliferation status, and molecular subtypes, using Pearson's Chi-square test. For prognosis, hazard ratios and cumulative incidence of death from BC were used. RESULTS: Of the 1955 tumours, 65 (3.3%) were ER Low Positive (ER ≥ 1 < 10%). Overall, the highest proportion of ER Low Positive tumours was observed among Luminal B (HER2 +) subtype (9.4%) and grade 3 tumours (4.3%). The risk of death from BC was lower in ER Low Positive and ER ≥ 10% compared to ER-negative cases. Compared to patients diagnosed before 1995, women diagnosed in 1995 or later showed a higher proportion of ER Low Positive BCs, and their tumours were of smaller size, lower grade, and lower proliferative status. There was no significant difference in prognosis compared to those with ER ≥ 10% tumours. CONCLUSION: Women with ER Low Positive tumours diagnosed in a time period when adjuvant therapy was available had tumours of smaller size, lower grade, and lower proliferative status, and similar prognosis to those with ER ≥ 10% compared to women diagnosed earlier.

Conversion of ER and HER2 Status After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have focused on converting ER-low-positive and HER2-low status following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We aimed to assess the evolution in ER and HER2 status after NAT in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our study included 481 patients with residual invasive breast cancer after NAT. ER and HER2 status were assessed in the primary tumor and residual disease, and associations between ER and HER2 conversion and clinicopathological factors were explored. RESULTS: In primary tumors, 305 (63.4%) cases were ER-positive (including 36 cases of ER-low-positive), 176 (36.6%) were ER-negative. In residual disease, ER status changed in 76 (15.8%) cases, of which 69 cases switched from positive to negative. ER-low-positive tumors (31/36) were the most likely to change. In primary tumors, 140 (29.1%) tumors were HER2-positive, and 341 (70.9%) were HER2-negative (including 209 cases of HER2-low and 132 cases of HER2-zero). In residual disease, 25 (5.2%) cases had HER2 conversion between positive and negative. Considering HER2-low status, 113 (23.5%) cases had HER2 conversion, mostly driven by cases switching either to or from HER2-low. ER conversion had a positive correlation with pretreatment ER status (r = 0.25; P = .00). There was a positive correlation between HER2 conversion and HER2-targeted therapy (r = 0.18; P = .00). CONCLUSION: Conversion of ER and HER2 status was observed in some breast cancer patients after NAT. Both ER-low-positive and HER2-low tumors showed high instability from the primary tumor to residual disease. ER and HER2 status should be retested in residual disease for further treatment decisions, especially in ER-low-positive and HER2-low breast cancer.

Clinical implication of low estrogen receptor (ER-low) expression in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and the estrogen receptor (ER) remains the most important biomarker in breast oncology. Most guidelines set a positive expression threshold of 1% staining in immunohistochemistry (IHC) to define ER positivity. However, different expression levels may be associated with diverse degrees of sensitivity to endocrine therapy as ER expression may impact breast cancer molecular biology as a continuous variable. ER-lo tumors, defined as those with 1-10% ER expression, represent a relatively small subgroup of breast cancer patients, with an estimated prevalence of 2-7%. These tumors are similar to ERneg disease in their molecular landscape, clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and response to therapy. Nevertheless, a proportion may retain some degree of ER signaling dependency, and the possibility of responding to some degree to endocrine therapy cannot be completely ruled out. This review article discusses the most important considerations regarding the definition of ER positivity, pathology assessment, prognosis, and therapeutic implication of ERlo breast cancer from the medical oncology perspective.

Heritability of Low ER Staining/HER2-Breast Tumors: Are We Missing an Opportunity for Germline Testing?

In 2010, the genetic testing criteria was changed to allow women diagnosed ≤ 60 years old with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to undergo germline testing. In the same year, estrogen receptor (ER) positivity was defined as having ≥1% ER staining cells. While tumors with 1-10% ER staining cells and HER2 negative (HER2-) status share characteristics with TNBC, the utility of germline testing in women with ER low positive/HER2- (ERLP/HER2-) tumors is not well-understood. To this end, all patients with hormone receptor positive staining cells ≤ 10% and negative HER2 status were identified. Clinical genetic test results were extracted for patients who underwent testing. Panel testing was performed for those women who had genomic DNA available for research purposes. ERLP/HER2-tumors constituted 2.7% of all tumors in the database. Patients did not differ significantly from those with TNBC by age at diagnosis, ethnicity, family history or tumor size, stage or grade (p > 0.05). Mutation frequency did not differ significantly (p = 0.757) between groups (ERLP/HER2- 16.1%; TNBC 16.7%). Hereditary forms of breast cancer were similar in both ERLP/HER2- and TNBC, thus current guidelines may result in the under testing of women with low ER tumors, resulting in missed opportunities to improve patient management.