[Adaptation and validation of an instrument to evaluate the competence on a Brief Tobacco Intervention. BTI-Prof©]. / Adaptación y validación de un instrumento de evaluación de la competencia del consejo breve para dejar de fumar. BTI-Prof©.

OBJECTIVE: Adaptation and validation of the BTI-St© to assess the level of competence in brief tobacco intervention in general practitioners and nurses in Primary Health Care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of adaptation and psychometric validation of a criterion-referenced test. SETTING: Primary Health Care. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-five general practitioners and nurses working at Primary Health Care. INTERVENTIONS: Three clinical scenarios were designed. Using an online platform, participants first viewed each scenario in which brief tobacco intervention was given. Health professional had to assess whether or not the scenarios were carried out in accordance with the 5A+5R model. MAIN MEASURES: Competence in brief tobacco intervention measured by the BTI-Prof©. RESULTS: Results related to reliability were obtained through Kuder-Richardson coefficient, being for scenario 1, 0.880, for scenario 2, 0.829, and for scenario 3, 0.826. The test-retest shows adequate temporal stability: intraclass correlation coefficient for scenario 1 0.857 (95% CI 0.734-0.923), p<0.0001, for scenario 2 0.829 (95% CI 0.676-0.909), p<0.001, and for scenario 3 0.869 (95% CI 0.76-0.928), p<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The BTI-Prof© is a robust tool with adequate psychometric properties to assess competence in brief tobacco intervention in Primary Health Care general practitioners and nurses.

[Development of a formative evaluation instrument for the community health worker health agent]. / Desarrollo de un instrumento de evaluación formativa del agente comunitario de salud.

To validate a formative evaluation instrument of the community health agent. DESIGN: Methodological study with a quantitative approach. LOCATION: Carried out in two municipalities in the South of Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: 40 nurses for 350 community health agents. PARTICIPANTS: The instrument was developed based on a competency framework of the Ministry of Health. The principal component analysis method was used for factor analysis. Internal validity and reliability were measured by Cronbach's alpha. The intraclass correlation coefficient, the Student's t test for paired samples and the ANOVA analysis of variance were used. RESULTS: The factor analysis produced a factor structure with six factors and the 52 competencies of the original instrument were maintained. The final version of the instrument was structured into six domains: "Micro-area monitoring" (12 competencies), "Health promotion" (nine competencies), "Prevention and monitoring of specific groups and morbidities" (10 competencies), "Prevention and monitoring of environmental and social risk" (nine competences), "Planning and evaluation" (seven competences), "Teamwork" (five competences). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.981, the test and the new test was p=0.851 by the Student's t-test, and the ICC was 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: The validated instrument constitutes an important reference in the discussion of the work of the Community Health Agent in the current context of public health policies. In addition to supporting the role of nurses in the supervision/in-service training of these professionals.

[Validation of the living with osteoarthritis in Spanish population]. / Validación de la escala de convivencia con artrosis en la población española.

OBJECTIVE: Present the psychometric results of the Living with Osteoarthritis (LW-OA) in Spanish population. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study, with retest on a fraction of the sample. LOCATION: Public and private centres of primary and secondary healthcare, as well as patient associations from Navarra, La Rioja, Madrid, Valencia and Malaga. PARTICIPANTS: The sample was composed by 291 patients with OA with a medical diagnosis in every stage of the disease from primary or secondary healthcare, Spanish nationality and not hospitalized. INTERVENTIONS: In addition to LW-OA, a sociodemographic questionnaire was included, as well as scales to evaluate social support perceived from the patient (DUFSS), quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) and satisfaction with life. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Psychometric properties of the LW-OA were measured, as viability and acceptability, reliability (internal consistency and reproducibility), precision and construct validity (convergent, internal and known-groups). RESULTS: 100% of the data were computable. Excellent data quality was obtained. Cronbach's alpha for the scale total was 0.87 and the homogeneity index 0.22. ICC for the scale total was 0.88. As for precision, the SEM was 5.18 (<½DE=7.47). CONCLUSIONS: The LW-OA is a valid and feasible measure to evaluate the process of living with OA in Spain.

[ECoLaE: Validation of a questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills for Nursing]. / ECoLaE: validación de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y habilidades en lactancia materna para enfermería.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the "Questionnaire on breastfeeding knowledge and skills" in Nurses (EcoLa). DESIGN: A validation study, with prior linguistic adaptation, according to the skills and training of the nurses. LOCATION: Cantabria. PARTICIPANTS: General nurses, paediatrics specialists, and midwives from the Cantabrian Health Service, with responsibility for mother-child care. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The psychometric properties of the nursing version of ECoLa were evaluated. Internal consistency was measured using α-Cronbach for multiple choice and overall answer questions, and Kuder-Richardson's formula (KR20) for dichotomous response questions. Inter-observer concordance was measured using the kappa coefficient in items 18 and 21, and the test-retest reliability with 11 subjects using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean score in the questionnaire was 21.15±4.67 points. There were no statistically significant differences as regards the gender or number of children. There was an association between the score obtained in the questionnaire and previous experience in lactation, and with the professional profile (midwife 24.23 points, paediatric nurse 21.20 points, and general nurse 20 points; P<.01). The internal consistency showed a KR20 of 0.802, and the α-Cronbach for multiple-choice questions was 0.719, and 0.866 for overall. Interobserver concordance for Item 18 had a kappa=0.6, for item 30 kappa=0.825), and for total score the kappa=0.856). The test-retest reliability overall score (CCI=0.856, 95% CI 0.55-0.96), and for question 30 (CCI=0.93, 95% CI 0.75-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The questionnaire scale has psychometric properties that make its use valid and reliable in the evaluation of the training of nursing professionals.

[Adapting and validating a questionnaire to measure the self-care practices in healthy child population residing in Spain]. / Adaptación y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar las prácticas de autocuidado en población infantil sana residente en España.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt and validate the Child and Adolescent Self-Care Performance Questionnaire (CASPQ) to the context of healthy children aged 8 to 12years residing in Spain and evaluate their metric properties. DESIGN: Validation study based on Classical Test Theory. LOCATION: Four schools participating in the Salut i Escola programme of a Primary Care Centre of Barcelona (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and ninety-eight elementary school students participated in the study during the first six months of 2016. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was carried out. Response process and factorial structure were evaluated and the relationships of the adapted questionnaire scores with those of the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire were analysed. Likewise, internal consistency and reproducibility of the scores were evaluated. RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-nine questionnaires were obtained. The confirmatory factor analysis of its theoretical structure showed a sufficient adjustment. A positive association was observed between the questionnaire scores and those of KIDSCREEN-27. The overall internal consistency was satisfactory; nevertheless, that of each factor was marginal or moderate. The reproducibility of the scores was optimal. CONCLUSIONS: The CASPQ adapted to the healthy child population of 8 to 12years old shows appropriate metric properties and similar to those of the original questionnaire. Therefore, it is a useful tool to assess self-care practices and plan interventions aimed at its promotion.

Validación de un cuestionario para medir la habilidad de la población general para evaluar afirmaciones acerca de tratamientos médicos.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Todos los días, las personas se enfrentan a afirmaciones acerca de tratamientos en medios de comunicación, redes sociales o por viva voz. OBJETIVO: Validar un cuestionario en español para medir las habilidades de un individuo para evaluar afirmaciones acerca de tratamientos. MÉTODO: Veintidós preguntas de opción múltiple de la base de datos Claim Evaluation Tools fueron traducidas y aplicadas a 172 niños y 268 adultos. Mediante un modelo Rasch se exploró el ajuste promedio e individual por reactivo, el potencial comportamiento diferencial del reactivo (basado en el género, edad y modo de aplicación), la multidimensionalidad y la independencia local. RESULTADOS: El ajuste promedio por reactivo fue apropiado. Cuatro preguntas de opción múltiple mostraron pobre ajuste. La fiabilidad del cuestionario fue satisfactoria, con un índice de separación de 0.7. Las preguntas de opción múltiple fueron unidimensionales, y no hubo dependencia específica. CONCLUSIÓN: Se obtuvo un conjunto de 18 preguntas de opción múltiple con ajuste satisfactorio. El cuestionario es el primero disponible y validado en español para medir las habilidades de los individuos para evaluar afirmaciones acerca de tratamientos. INTRODUCTION: Every day, people are faced with claims about treatment effects through mass media, social media, or by word of mouth. OBJECTIVE: To validate a Spanish-language questionnaire to measure the ability of an individual to assess claims about treatments effects. METHOD: A set of 22 multiple choice questions taken from the claim evaluation tools database were translated and applied to 172 children and 268 adults. Using a Rasch model, overall and individual item-person fit was explored, as well as the potential item differential functioning (based on gender, age and mode of administration), multidimensionality and local independence. RESULTS: Overall item-person fit was appropriate. Four multiple-choice questions showed a poor fit. Reliability of the questionnaire was satisfactory with a person separation index of 0.7. Multiple-choice questions were unidimensional, and there was no specific dependency. CONCLUSION: A set of 18 multiple-choice questions with satisfactory fit was obtained. This is the first available questionnaire validated in Spanish to measure individuals' ability to assess claims about treatment effects.

[Detecting and measuring functional and organic disease in general population: Development and validation of TOPYPS clinical scale]. / Detección y medición de la enfermedad funcional y orgánica en población general: desarrollo y validación de la escala clínica TOPYPS.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the TOPYPS scale, an instrument designed to: (i)detect with a high degree of suspicion the most frequent functional pathologies according to standard diagnostic criteria, and (ii)to assess the physical health in the general population quickly, comprehensive and reliable. DESIGN: Validation of a scale. LOCATION: Primary Care Centre, Barcelona. PARTICIPANTS: The scale was administered to 67 randomly selected adults. MEASUREMENTS: TOPYPS scale was administered to 67 adults randomly selected from a primary care setting in Barcelona, Spain. TOPYPS has six sections based on body systems, each one scored according to the degree of interference in daily activity, type of treatment received, and prognostic of the reported illnesses in each section. Test-retest reliability completions were on two separate occasions one week apart. Validity was then tested by comparing the results with the clinical examination conducted by two different specialists in general practice (gold standard). RESULTS: Repeatability (test-retest) and inter-rater agreement for each of the six sections and for the total score were satisfactory. Validity was acceptable both for content and construct, according to their correlation with the gold standard. CONCLUSIONS: TOPYPS displayed good psychometrical properties. It is a suitable tool to detect and measure functional and organic diseases in general population.

[Diagnostic validity and usefulness of the Eating Attitudes Test-26 for the assessment of eating disorders risk in a Colombian male population]. / Validez y utilidad diagnóstica de la escala Eating Attitudes Test-26 para la evaluación del riesgo de trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en población masculina de Medellín, Colombia.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the diagnostic validity and usefulness of Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26) for the risk assessment of eating disorders in a male population. DESCRIPTION: Observational validation study questionnaire. SETTING: Performed in Medellin city at a community care level of mixed (public and private) psychiatric clinics. SUBJECTS: The study included 21 male subjects aged ≥14 with DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS), and 93 controls without ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: A convenience sample was used for the cases and a simple, randomised one for controls. A reference standard (structured psychiatrist interview confirming the fulfilment of ED case inclusion criteria) was compared with the EAT-26 questionnaire. Reliability, cultural, semantics, and factorial validation were performed, and the best cut-off score was established with the ROC curve. RESULTS: Four domains remain in the instrument: dieting-bulimia and food pre-occupation, dieting, oral control-dieting, and oral control-bulimia. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.89, and a score of ≥20 is the best cut-off (sensitivity=100% and specificity=97.8%). The positive predictive value was 91.3% and the negative predictive value was 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS: EAT-26 questionnaire is an ideal multidimensional instrument for Eating Disorder screening in risk populations, with excellent reliability, sensitivity and specificity values. EAT-26 could be a useful tool to be considered when strategies for early detection of Eating Disorders are implemented in the male population.

Assessing the accuracy of a point-of-care analyzer for hyperlipidaemia in western Kenya.

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of hyperlipidaemia, along with other non-communicable diseases, is on the rise in low- and middle-income countries. CardioChek PA is a point-of-care lipid measuring device, which seeks to overcome laboratory-based diagnostic barriers by providing immediate results without dependency on significant laboratory infrastructure. However, it has not been validated in Kenya. In this study, we assess the accuracy of CardioChek PA with respect to the gold standard laboratory-based testing. METHODS: In Webuye, Kenya, two blood samples were collected from 246 subjects to simultaneously measure the lipid levels via both CardioChek PA and the gold standard. All subjects were adults, and geographic stratified sampling methods were applied. Statistical analysis of the device's accuracy was based on per cent bias parameters, as established by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NIH recommends that per cent bias be ≤±3% for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, ≤±5% for high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, ≤±5% for total cholesterol (TC) and ≤±4% for triglycerides (TG). Risk group misclassification rates were also analysed. RESULTS: The CardioChek PA analyzer was substantially inaccurate for LDL cholesterol (-25.9% bias), HDL cholesterol (-8.2% bias) and TC (-15.9% bias). Moreover, those patients at higher risk of complications from hyperlipidaemia were most likely to be misclassified into a lower risk category. CONCLUSION: CardioChek PA is inaccurate and not suitable for our clinical setting. Furthermore, our findings highlight the need to validate new diagnostic tools in the appropriate setting prior to scale up regardless of their potential for novel utility.

[Spanish cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus]. / Adaptación cultural al español y validación psicométrica del Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2.

OBJECTIVE: To undertake the cultural adaptation and the psychometric assessment of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) in Spanish population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Clinimetric validation study. SETTING: Primary health care centers of District Malaga and Valle del Guadalhorce. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-one persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: The SDSCA validated in mexican population was subjected to semantic and content equivalence using a Delphi method, its legibility was determined by INFLESZ scale. Subsequently psychometric validation was conducted through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (herein after EFA and CFA), internal consistency, test-retest reliability and discriminant validity. RESULTS: Two rounds were needed to achieve the consensus in between the panel members. Then, the index provided a good readability. The EFA suggested a model with 3 factors (diet, exercise and self-analysis) with 7 items which explained 79.16% variance. The results of CFA showed a good fit of SDSCA-Sp. The Internal consistency was moderate to low (α-Cronbach =0.62) and test-retest reliability was evaluated in 198 patients (t=0.462-0.796, p<0.001) with a total correlation of 0.764 (p< 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The SDSCA-Sp is used, in a valid way to assess self-care in type 2 DM version in clinical practice and research with similar clinimetric properties to previous studies.

[Design and validation of a questionnaire to assess the level of general knowledge on eating disorders in students of Health Sciences]. / Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar el nivel de conocimientos generales en trastornos del comportamiento alimentario en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud.

OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a questionnaire to assess the level of knowledge regarding eating disorders in college students. DESIGN: Observational, prospective, and longitudinal study, with the design of the questionnaire based on a conceptual review and validation by a cognitive pre-test and pilot test-retest, with analysis of the psychometric properties in each application. LOCATION: University Foundation of Bages, Barcelona. Marco community care. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 140 students from Health Sciences; 53 women and 87 men with a mean age of 21.87 years; 28 participated in the pre-test and 112 in the test-retests, 110 students completed the study. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Validity and stability study using Cronbach α and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient statistics; relationship skills with sex and type of study, non-parametric statistical Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests; for demographic variables, absolute or percentage frequencies, as well as mean, central tendency and standard deviation as measures of dispersion were calculated. The statistical significance level was 95% confidence. RESULTS: The questionnaire was obtained that had 10 questions divided into four dimensions (classification, demographics characteristics of patients, risk factors and clinical manifestations of eating disorders). The scale showed good internal consistency in its final version (Cronbach α=0.724) and adequate stability (Pearson correlation 0.749). CONCLUSIONS: The designed tool can be accurately used to assess Health Sciences students' knowledge of eating disorders.

[Development and validation of a questionnaire on knowledge and personal hygiene habits in childhood (HICORIN®)]. / Diseño y validación de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos y hábitos en higiene corporal infantil (HICORIN®).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire on the integral assessment of the habits and knowledge in personal hygiene in children between 7 to 12 years old in the educational, social and health environment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study for the validation of a questionnaire. LOCATION: One primary and secondary school and one children's home in the Region of Murcia, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 86 children were included (80 from a primary and secondary school; 6 from a children's home), as well as 7 experts. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Content validation by experts; qualitative assessment; identify difficulties related to some questions, item response analysis, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: After the literature search, 20 tools that included items related to child body hygiene were obtained. The researchers selected 34 items and drafted 48 additional ones. After content validity by the experts, the questionnaire (HICORIN®) was reduced to 63 items, and consisted of 7 dimensions of child personal hygiene (skin, hair, hands, oral, feet, ears, and intimate hygiene). After with the children some terms were adapted to improve their understanding. Only two items had non-response rates that exceeded 10%. The test-retest showed that 84.1% of the items had between very good and moderate reliability. CONCLUSIONS: HICORIN® is a reliable and valid instrument that integrally assesses the habits and knowledge in personal hygiene in children between 7-12 years old. It is applicable in educative and social and health environments and in children from different socioeconomic levels.

[The adaptation and validation to Spanish of the questionnaire Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE), for the assessment of the ability of patients in medical decision-making]. / Adaptación y validación al español del cuestionario Aid to Capacity Evaluation (ACE) , para la valoración de la capacidad del paciente en la toma de decisiones médicas.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt and validate the Spanish version of the Aid to Capacity Evaluation scale, designed to assess the capacity of the adult in medical decision-making, both in diagnosis and treatment processes. DESIGN: Observational study of prospective validation. SETTING: Primary and hospital care of the basic health area of Jaen. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaire which included sociodemographic variables, concerning the decision (scope, type of decision, the need for written informed consent), assessment of the capacity to the Aid to Capacity Evaluation scale and other related comorbidity (hearing loss, alcoholism, cognitive level variables with the Mini-Mental State Examination and depression by Goldberg or Yesavage test). RESULTS: The tool is considered viable. The conclusions of the expert panel were favorable. The result of the criteria' validity, comparing the results with the assessment of the experts (forensic and psychiatrist) was very satisfying (P<.001). The intra-observer reliability was low (kappa=0,135). Interobserver reliability remained high (kappa=0.74). The internal consistency was awarded an alpha of Cronbach's 0,645 for the reduced model of 6 items. CONCLUSIONS: The Aid to Capacity Evaluation scale was adapted to Spanish, demonstrating adequate internal consistency and construct validity. Its use in clinical practice could contribute to the identification of patients unable to make a particular medical decision and/or to give an informed consent.

[Diagnostic validity and usefulness of the Eating Attitudes Test-26 for the assessment of eating disorders risk in a Colombian female population]. / Validez y utilidad diagnóstica de la escala EAT-26 para la evaluación del riesgo de trastornos de la conducta alimentaria en población femenina de Medellín, Colombia.

OBJECTIVE: To establish diagnostic validity and usefulness of EAT-26 for the risk assessment of Eating Disorder (ED) in a female population. DESCRIPTION: Observational validation study questionnaire. SETTING: Performed in a Medellin city community care level of mixed (public and private) psychiatric consultation. SUBJECTS: Twenty five subjects aged 15 to 25 with DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for anorexia and bulimia nervosa and 111 controls without ED. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The case sample was for convenience and in controls an aleatory simple one. Gold standard (structured psychiatrist interview confirming the fulfillment of ED case inclusion criteria) was compared with EAT-26 questionnaire; reliability was assessed, cultural, semantics and factorial validation was made and the best cut-off score was established with the ROC curve. RESULTS: Four domains remain in the instrument: bulimia, dieting, food preoccupation and oral control. The Cronbach's alpha was 92.1% and a score of 11 and over is the best cut-off (sensitivity 100%, and specificity 85.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This modified and abbreviated EAT-26 questionnaire is an ideal multidimensional instrument for ED screening in risk population, with excellent reliability and sensitivity values and satisfactory specificity. EAT-26 is a useful measure to be considered when strategies for ED early detection are implemented in young women.

[Convergent and discriminative validity of the Frail-VIG index with the Pfeiffer test in people cared for in home care]. / Validez convergente y discriminativa del índice Frágil-VIG con el test de Pfeiffer en personas atendidas en atención domiciliaria.

INTRODUCTION: The Frail-VIG index-and the Pfeiffer test are measurements used in Primary Care for assessment frailty and the cognitive impairment screening. The Frail-VIG index is a multidimensional instrument that allows a rapid assessment of the degree of frailty in the context of clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the convergent and discriminative validity of the Frail-VIG index with regard to Pfeiffer test value. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SITE: Two urban Primary Health Care centres of the Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona (Spain). PARTICIPANTS: All people included under a home care programme during the year 2018. No exclusion criteria were applied. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: We used the Frail-VIG index to measure frailty and the Pfeiffer test to cognitive impairment screening. Trained nurses administered both instruments during face-to-face assessments in a participant's home during usual care. The relationships between both instruments were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: A total of 412 participants were included. Frail-VIG score and Pfeiffer test value were moderately correlated (r=0.564; P<0.001). Non-frail people had a lower risk of developing cognitive impairment than moderate to severe frail people. The value of the Pfeiffer test increased significantly as the Frail-VIG index score also increased. CONCLUSIONS: Frail-VIG index demonstrated a convergent validity with the Pfeiffer test. Its discriminative validity was optimal, as their scores showed an excellent capacity to differentiate between people with a higher and lower risk of developing cognitive impairment. These findings provide additional pieces of evidence for construct validity of the Frail-VIG index.

Construct validity and reliability of the BARRIERS scale in the Spanish context.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the construct validity of the Spanish version of the BARRIERS scale. METHOD: Methodological study of validation of a measurement instrument based on data from previously published studies. The study population consisted of nurses from the Basque Health Service and the Canary Health Service. The following variables were extracted and unified: Years of professional experience, possession of a specialist nursing degree, possession of a doctorate, type of activity performed by the professional and field of work. For construct validation, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed based on the initial model proposed for the scale and RASCH analysis. A polychoric correlation matrix, factor extraction by unweighted least squares and PROMIN oblique rotation were used. For the RASCH analysis, the Joint Maximun Likelihood estimation (JMLE) method was used; the fit of the items and persons were estimated by means of outfit - Unweighted Mean Square fit statistic (UMS) and infit -Weighted Mean Square Fit Statistic (WMS), as well as the reliability and separation of items and persons. RESULTS: A total of 1200 nurses and midwives made up the final validation sample (n = 1200), with a mean professional experience of 21.22 ± 9.26 years. The CFA presented a good fit to the data (KMO = 0.935 [95% CI: 0.921-0.945]), changing the factorial assignment in 6 items, while 5 items received factorial scores in more than one factor. The fit values for the 4-factor solution were RMSEA = 0.026 [95% CI: 0.026-0.027] and GFI = 0.991 [95% CI: 0.986-0.991]. In the RASCH analysis most items presented infit-WMS and outfit-UMS values with a good fit. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the BARRIERS scale has adequate construct validity although there are changes in the assignment of items to the dimensions compared to the original model. The RASCH analysis indicates adequate fit for both persons and items.

[Design and validation of a questionnaire on attitudes to prevention and health promotion in primary care (CAPPAP)]. / Diseño y validación de un cuestionario sobre las actitudes ante la prevención y promoción de la salud en atención primaria (CAPPAP).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a questionnaire to measure attitudes towards prevention and health promotion. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study for the validation of a questionnaire. LOCATION: Primary Health Care (autonomous community of Andalusia, Spain). PARTICIPANTS: 282 professionals (nurses and doctors) belonging to the Public Health System. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Content validation by experts, ceiling effects and floor effects, correlation between items, internal consistency, stability and exploratory factor analysis. RESULTS: The 56 items of the tool (CAPPAP) obtained, including those from the review of other tools and the contributions of the experts, were grouped into 5 dimensions. The percentage of expert agreement was over 70% on all items, and a high concordance between prevention and promotion item was obtained, thus, duplicates were removed leaving a final tool with 44 items. The internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.888. The test retest indicated concordance from substantial to almost perfect. Exploratory factor analysis identified five factors that accounted for 48.92% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: CAPPAP is a tool that is quick and easy to administer, that is well accepted by professionals, and that has acceptable psychometric results, both globally and at the level of each dimension.

Design and psychometric evaluation of the maternal perception of postpartum care in comprehensive health centers.

BACKGROUND: Mothers' perceptions of the quality and quantity of care they have received and their relationship with healthcare personnel significantly impact continuity of care and future referrals. This study evaluated the psychometric dimensions of the Iranian version of the Mothers' Perception of Postpartum Health Care questionnaire in comprehensive health centers. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in which the questionnaire was administered to 250 women from different comprehensive health centers. First, the questionnaire was translated verbatim from English to Persian. Then, we evaluated the face, content, structural validity, and reliability of the questionnaire. RESULTS: The results showed that this questionnaire's face, content, structure validity, and reliability were adequate. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was 0.668. The interclass correlation coefficient was 0.688, which confirmed divergent validity. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers' Perception of Postpartum Health Care questionnaire in comprehensive health centers is valid and reliable for measuring maternal perception of these vital services.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La percepción de las madres con respecto a la calidad y cantidad de la atención que han recibido, así como de su relación con el personal de salud impactan significativamente en la continuidad de la atención y sus futuras derivaciones. Este estudio se diseñó para evaluar las dimensiones psicométricas de la versión iraní del Cuestionario de Percepción de las Madres sobre la Atención de la Salud Posparto en los centros integrales de salud. MÉTODOS: Se llevó a cabo un estudio transversal en el que se aplicó el cuestionario a 250 mujeres de distintos centros integrales de salud. En primer lugar, el cuestionario se tradujo de forma literal del inglés al persa. Después se evaluó la validez aparente, de contenido y de estructura, así como la confiabilidad del cuestionario. RESULTADOS: Los resultados mostraron que la validez aparente, de contenido y de estructura, así como la confiabilidad de este cuestionario son adecuadas. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach para todo el cuestionario fue 0.668. El coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue 0.688, lo que confirmó una validez divergente. CONCLUSIONES: El Cuestionario de Percepción de las Madres sobre la Atención de la Salud Posparto en los centros integrales de salud es válido y confiable para medir la percepción materna sobre estos servicios vitales.

[Convergent and discriminative validity of the Frail-VIG index with the Braden scale in people cared for in home care]. / Validez convergente y discriminativa del índice Frágil-VIG con la escala de Braden en personas atendidas en atención domiciliaria.

The Frail-VIG index and the Braden scale are validated instruments for assessing frailty and the risk of developing dependency-related skin lesions respectively. The Frail-VIG index is a multidimensional instrument that allows rapid and efficient assessment of the degree of frailty in the context of clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate the convergent and discriminative validity of the Frail-VIG index with regard to Braden scale value. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional study in 2 primary health care centres of the Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona (Spain). Participants in the study were all people included under a home care programme during the year 2018. No exclusion criteria were applied. We used the Frail-VIG index to measure frailty and the Braden scale to measure the risk of developing pressure ulcers. Trained nurses administered both instruments during face-to-face assessments in a participant's home during usual care. The relationships between both instruments were examined using Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Four hundred and twelve participants were included. Frail-VIG score and Braden scale value were negatively correlated (r=-0.597; P<.0001). Non-frail people had a lower risk of developing dependency-related skin lesions than moderate to severe frail people. The Braden scale value declined significantly as the Frail-VIG index score increased. CONCLUSIONS: Frail-VIG index demonstrated a convergent validity with the Braden scale. Its discriminative validity was optimal, as their scores showed an excellent capacity to differentiate between people with a higher and lower risk of developing. These findings provide additional pieces of evidence for construct validity of the Frail-VIG index.

Translation to Spanish and validation of a scale for the observation of breastfeeding: The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool.

INTRODUCTION: The observation of a feeding by a professional is important to strengthen breastfeeding. The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT) was translated into Spanish and validated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Translation and back-translation of the original scale was done. Six pediatricians and six pediatric nurses collaborated. At the newborn's first visit, a feeding was observed and the pediatrician and nurse scored the BBAT scale independently. The nurse also scored the LATCH Breastfeeding Assessment (LATCH) and each mother filled out the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES-SF). Mothers were appointed a week later and the nurse re-scored the BBAT. RESULTS: A total of 62 mothers participated. There was good internal consisitency for the BBAT (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83 in the assessment made by the nurses and Cronbach's alpha = 0.79 in the assessment made by the pediatricians). Inter-rater consistency showed an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.91, while for the test-retest was 0.67. Concurrent validity with the BSES-SF scale was good and with the LATCH scale very good. The factor analysis showed the one-dimensional character of the scale and a good homogeneity of the 4 items (positioning = 0.771, attachment = 0.852, sucking = 0.856 and swallowing = 0.679). CONCLUSIONS: The scale obtained in Spanish shows good reliability and validity. The BBAT is an easy-to-use tool that allows breastfeeding assessment and determines the aspects that need to be improved.