Dorsal Approach Combined with In Situ Split for Laparoscopic Segment 7 Resection.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic segment 7 resection has been a technically challenging procedure (Li et al. in J Gastrointest Surg 23:1084-1085, 2019). We introduce a dorsal approach with in situ split for laparoscopic segment 7 resection. PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 26-year-old male diagnosed with hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia located in segment 7. The lesion, measuring approximately 6.7 cm × 5.7 cm, was close to the right caudate lobe. Firstly, the segment 7 pedicle was exposed through the Rouviere's groove combined with caudate lobe-first approach, followed by clipping to confirm demarcation. Peripheral parenchymal transection at the dorsal side started and the intersegmental vein between segments 6 and 7 was found. Dissection of this vein towards its root proceeded preferentially at the dorsal side. Then the segment 7 pedicle was cut off, followed by parenchymal transection toward the cranial side to find the trunk of the compressed right hepatic vein (RHV). It was further dissociated from the trunk to periphery, exposing and cutting off its branches draining segment 7. The remaining parenchyma at the cranioventral side was subsequently separated along the exposed RHV. Finally, the resection of segment 7 was accomplished by dividing the right perihepatic ligaments. RESULTS: The operative time was 395 min with the estimated blood loss of 500 ml. The patient did not receive perioperative blood transfusion. The patient was discharged on tenth postoperative day following suture removal without experiencing any postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, or other complications. CONCLUSION: Dorsal approach combined with in situ split for laparoscopic segment 7 resection is feasible and has certain advantages (Cao et al. in Surg Endosc 35:174-181, 2021; Liu et al. in Surg Oncol 38:101575, 2021; Yang et al. in Surg Endosc 37:1334-1341, 2023). Further investigations are required due to some limitations.

Impact of Liver Cirrhosis, Severity of Cirrhosis, and Portal Hypertension on the Difficulty and Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Major Liver Resections for Primary Liver Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) offer potential benefits such as reduced blood loss and morbidity compared with open liver resections. Several studies have suggested that the impact of cirrhosis differs according to the extent and complexity of resection. Our aim was to investigate the impact of cirrhosis on the difficulty and outcomes of MILR, focusing on major hepatectomies. METHODS: A total of 2534 patients undergoing minimally invasive major hepatectomies (MIMH) for primary malignancies across 58 centers worldwide were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score (PSM) and coarsened exact matching (CEM) were used to compare patients with and without cirrhosis. RESULTS: A total of 1353 patients (53%) had no cirrhosis, 1065 (42%) had Child-Pugh A and 116 (4%) had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis. Matched comparison between non-cirrhotics vs Child-Pugh A cirrhosis demonstrated comparable blood loss. However, after PSM, postoperative morbidity and length of hospitalization was significantly greater in Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, but these were not statistically significant with CEM. Comparison between Child-Pugh A and Child-Pugh B cirrhosis demonstrated the latter had significantly higher transfusion rates and longer hospitalization after PSM, but not after CEM. Comparison of patients with cirrhosis of all grades with and without portal hypertension demonstrated no significant difference in all major perioperative outcomes after PSM and CEM. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and severity of cirrhosis affected the difficulty and impacted the outcomes of MIMH, resulting in higher blood transfusion rates, increased postoperative morbidity, and longer hospitalization in patients with more advanced cirrhosis. As such, future difficulty scoring systems for MIMH should incorporate liver cirrhosis and its severity as variables.

Clinical impact and role of major vessels involvement in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

BACKGROUND: Severe bleeding remains a significant concern in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma. It is rarely reported that how the degree of major vessels involvement impacts on severe bleeding. The present study primarily aimed to analyze the impacts of the number of involved major vessels (NIMV) during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma and evaluate the risk factors associated with increased bleeding. METHODS: A database search was carried out for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for liver hemangiomas at our department from January 2018 to December 2023. The collected data included demographics, characteristics of the hemangiomas, laboratory data, operation method, surgical and postoperative variables. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study. 42 patients were categorized into the group with NIMV < 2, while 30 patients were divided into the group with NIMV ≥ 2. The group with NIMV ≥ 2 demonstrated a significant correlation with special segments, involved multiple segments and diameter of the hemangiomas (P < 0.01). And the perioperative variables including the extent of resection, operative time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver times, postoperative stay, drainage tube duration, and postoperative liver function (ALT, AST) also showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Notably, NIMV ≥ 2 was identified as the most important independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 ml in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma (P = 0.011). For NIMV ≥ 2, the independent risk factor was special segments in multivariate analysis (P = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The involvement of multiple major vessels (NIMV ≥ 2) was significantly associated with special segments, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss, operation difficulty, and delayed postoperative recovery. Moreover, it was identified as the single independent risk factor with a considerable risk for increased blood loss during laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

Evolution of minimally invasive liver surgery in France over the last decade.

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence of benefits on postoperative outcomes, minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) had a very low diffusion up to 2014, and recent evolution is unknown. Our aim was to analyze the recent diffusion and adoption of MILS and compare the trends in indications, extent of resection, and institutional practice with open liver surgery (OLS). METHODS: We analyzed the French nationwide, exhaustive cohort of all patients undergoing a liver resection in France between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2022. Average annual percentage changes (AAPC) in the incidence of MILS and OLS were compared using mixed-effects log-linear regression models. Time trends were analyzed in terms of extent of resection, indication, and institutional practice. RESULTS: MILS represented 25.2% of 74,671 liver resections and year incidence doubled from 16.5% in 2013 to 35.4% in 2022. The highest AAPC were observed among major liver resections [+ 22.2% (19.5; 24.9) per year], primary [+ 10.2% (8.5; 12.0) per year], and secondary malignant tumors [+ 9.9% (8.2; 11.6) per year]. The highest increase in MILS was observed in university hospitals [+ 14.7% (7.7; 22.2) per year] performing 48.8% of MILS and in very high-volume (> 150 procedures/year) hospitals [+ 12.1% (9.0; 15.3) per year] performing 19.7% of MILS. OLS AAPC decreased for all indications and institutions and accelerated over time from - 1.8% (- 3.9; - 0.3) per year in 2013-2018 to - 5.9% (- 7.9; - 3.9) per year in 2018-2022 (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first reported trend reversal between MILS and OLS. MILS has considerably increased at a national scale, crossing the 20% tipping point of adoption rate as defined by the IDEAL framework.

Nitroglycerin versus milrinone for low central venous pressure in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Conventional anesthesia used to reduce central venous pressure (CVP) during hepatectomy includes fluid restriction and vasodilator drugs, which can lead to a reduction in blood perfusion in vital organs and may counteract the benefits of low blood loss. In this study, we hypothesized that milrinone is feasible and effective in controlling low CVP (LCVP) during laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH). Compared with conventional anesthesia such as nitroglycerin, milrinone is beneficial in terms of intraoperative blood loss, surgical environment, hemodynamic stability, and patients' recovery. METHODS: In total, 68 patients undergoing LH under LCVP were randomly divided into the milrinone group (n = 34) and the nitroglycerin group (n = 34). Milrinone was infused with a loading dose of 10 µg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/min and nitroglycerin was administered at a rate of 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/min until the liver lesions were removed. The characteristics of patients, surgery, intraoperative vital signs, blood loss, the condition of the surgical field, the dosage of norepinephrine, perioperative laboratory data, and postoperative complications were compared between groups. Blood loss during LH was considered the primary outcome. RESULTS: Blood loss during hepatectomy and total blood loss were significantly lower in the milrinone group compared with those in the nitroglycerin group (P < 0.05). Both the nitroglycerin group and milrinone group exerted similar CVP (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, the milrinone group had better surgical field grading during liver resection (P < 0.05) and also exhibited higher cardiac index and cardiac output during the surgery (P < 0.05). Significant differences were also found in terms of fluids administered during hepatectomy, urine volume during hepatectomy, total urine volume, and norepinephrine dosage used in the surgery between the two groups. The two groups showed a similar incidence of postoperative complications (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the intraoperative infusion of milrinone can help in maintaining an LCVP and hemodynamic stability during LH while reducing intraoperative blood loss and providing a better surgical field compared with nitroglycerin. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2200056891,first registered on 22/02/2022.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) on the short-term and long-term outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with and without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed for articles published from inception to March 1, 2023. Meta-analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes was performed using a random effects model. Data were summarized as mean difference and risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Five cohort studies with a total of 310 HCC patients were included (CSPH 143; Non-CSPH 167). In terms of surgical outcomes, estimated blood loss and the length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the Non-CSPH group than in the CSPH group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding other surgical outcomes, including the operative time, ratio of conversion to open surgery, and overall complication rate. In addition, there were also no significant differences between the two groups regarding the oncological outcomes, such as 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: HCC patients with and without CSPH who underwent LH had comparable surgical and oncological outcomes. LH is a safe and effective treatment for HCC patients with CSPH under the premise of rational screening of patients.

Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the 2 principal minimally invasive surgical approaches and the first line of treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is not clear which one has greater safety and efficacy. In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare the safety and effectiveness of LH versus RFA for patients with HCC, especially where perioperative and postoperative outcomes differrent. METHODS: In PROSPERO, a meta-analysis with registration number CRD42021257575 was registered. Using an established search strategy, we systematically searched Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase to identify eligible studies before June 2023. Data on operative times, blood loss, length of stay, overall complications, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, the present meta-analysis included 8 retrospective and 6 PSM studies comprising 1,848 patients (810 and 1,038 patients underwent LH and RFA). In this meta-analysis, neither LH nor RFA showed significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate and 5-year RFS rate. Despite this, in comparison to the RFA group, LH resulted in significantly higher 1-year(p<0.0001) and 3-year RFS rate (p = 0.005), higher 5-year OS rate (p = 0.008), lower local recurrence rate (p<0.00001), longer length of stay(LOS) (p<0.0001), longer operative time(p<0.0001), more blood loss (p<0.0001), and higher rate of complications (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Comparative studies indicate that LH seemed to provide better OS and lower local recurrence rate, but higher complication rate and longer hospitalization.

Positive impact of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy on body size-corrected bleeding in obese patients.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is reported to cause less bleeding than open hepatectomy (OH) in obese patients; however, there are no reports addressing this issue in terms of body size-corrected bleeding. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 31 obese and 149 non-obese patients who underwent LH and 32 obese and 245 non-obese patients who underwent OH. Bleeding corrected for body surface area (C-BL) was compared between the obese and non-obese patients who underwent each procedure. A multivariate analysis for increased C-BL was performed using the median C-BL for each procedure. RESULTS: The median C-BL tended to be higher in the obese patients than in the non-obese patients who underwent LH, but there was no significant difference (72 vs. 42 mL/m2, P = 0.050). However, it was significantly higher in the obese patients than in the non-obese patients who underwent OH (542 vs. 333 mL/m2, P = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis, for OH, sectionectomy or more (OR 3.20, P < 0.001) and a high BMI (OR 2.76, P = 0.018) were found to be independent risk factors, whereas for LH, a high BMI was not (OR 1.58, P = 0.301). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity was identified as a risk factor for increased bleeding with body size correction for OH, but the risk was reduced for LH.

Comparison of laparoscopic hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline from January 2000 to May 2022 for literature comparing the efficacy of LH and PRFA in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (largest tumour diameter ≤ 3 cm, number of intrahepatic tumours ≤3, or diameter of a single intrahepatic lesion ≤5 cm. ). We assessed overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), local recurrence and complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 1886 patients with small HCC were included in the 8 studies included in this study, of which 839 underwent LH and 1047 underwent PRAF. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the two groups had the same 3-year (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.47) and 5-year (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.87) OS rates, and the LH group had better 3-year (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.68) and 5-year (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.85) RFS rates. The LH group had a lower local recurrence rate (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.32), but the PRFA group had a lower complication rate (OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.76 to 3.54). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in OS between LH and PRFA in the treatment of small HCC. LH had a higher RFS rate and a lower local recurrence rate, but PRFA had a lower complication rate. In general, the long-term efficacy of LH in the treatment of small HCC is better than that of PRFA. Considering the advantages of less trauma and a low complication rate of PRFA, a large number of RCT studies are needed for further verification in the future.

Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation in treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma: safety and efficacy in comparison with laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation (LAMWA), as one of the locoregional therapies, has been employed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of LAMWA and laparoscopic hepatectomy in the treatment of small HCC.This study included 140 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 68 patients received LAMWA and 72 patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. The perioperative condition, liver function recovery, the alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level, morbidities, hospitalization time, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence rate between the two groups were compared. The rate of complete elimination of tumor tissue was 100% and the AFP level was returned to normal within 3 months after surgery in both groups (P > 0.05). The mean alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) peak in the LAMWA group was lower than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (259.51 ± 188.75 VS 388.9 ± 173.65, P = 0.000) and (267.34 ± 190.65 VS 393.1 ± 185.67, P = 0.000), respectively. The mean operation time in the LAMWA group was shorter than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (89 ± 31 min VS 259 ± 48 min, P = 0.000). The blood loss in the LAMWA group was less than that in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (58.4 ± 64.0 ml VS 213.0 ± 108.2 ml, P = 0.000). Compared with the laparoscopic hepatectomy group, patients in the LAMWA group had lower mean hospital stay (4.8 ± 1.2d VS 11.5 ± 2.9d, P = 0.000). The morbidities of the LAMWA group and the hepatectomy group were 14.7%(10/68) and 34.7%(25/72), respectively (P = 0.006). The one-, three-, and five-year OS rates were 88.2%, 69.9%, 45.6% for the LAMWA group and 86.1%, 72.9%, 51.4% for the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (P = 0.693). The corresponding DFS rates for the two groups were 76.3%, 48.1%, 27.9% and 73.2%, 56.7%, 32.0% (P = 0.958). Laparoscopic-assisted microwave ablation is a safe and effective therapeutic option for selected small HCC.

Goal-directed fluid therapy during post-resection phase in low central venous pressure assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized controlled superiority trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective single blinded randomized controlled trial was to find out whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) strategy in post-transection period in low central venous pressure (CVP) assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has more benefit than traditional fluid strategy. METHODS: Between April 2020 and Dec 2021, patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic liver resection surgery were eligible to participate in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group that received traditional fluid strategy in post-transection period in low CVP assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy and GDFT strategy group that received GDFT strategy in post-transection period. The primary outcome parameter is the incidence of postoperative complications. Secondary outcome parameters include perioperative clinical outcomes, postoperative clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay after surgery, postoperative lactic acid, fluids and vasoactive medications during the operation. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients in the control group and 160 patients in the GDFT were included. Two groups had no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications including pneumonia (P = 0.34), acute kidney injury (P = 0.72), hepatic insufficiency (P = 0.25), pleural effusion (P = 0.08) and seroperitoneum (P = 1.00), respectively. The amount of perioperative urine output is fewer in GDFT group than in the control group (P = 0.0354), while other perioperative variables and postoperative variables were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results show the implementation of GDFT strategy is not associated with fewer postoperative complications. GDFT strategy did not result in improved outcomes in low CVP-assisted laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Development of real-time navigation system for laparoscopic hepatectomy using magnetic micro sensor.

BACKGROUND: We report a new real-time navigation system for laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH), which resembles a car navigation system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Virtual three-dimensional liver and body images were reconstructed using the "New-VES" system, which worked as roadmap during surgery. Several points of the patient's body were registered in virtual images using a magnetic position sensor (MPS). A magnetic transmitter, corresponding to an artificial satellite, was placed about 40 cm above the patient's body. Another MPS, corresponding to a GPS antenna, was fixed on the handling part of the laparoscope. Fiducial registration error (FRE, an error between real and virtual lengths) was utilized to evaluate the accuracy of this system. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent LH with this system. Mean FRE of the initial five patients was 17.7 mm. Mean FRE of eight patients in whom MDCT was taken using radiological markers for registration of body parts as first improvement, was reduced to 10.2 mm (p = .014). As second improvement, a new MPS as an intraoperative body position sensor was fixed on the right-sided chest wall for automatic correction of postural gap. The preoperative and postoperative mean FREs of 8 patients with both improvements were 11.1 mm and 10.1 mm (p = .250). CONCLUSIONS: Our system may provide a promising option that virtually guides LH.

Real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging and navigation for cone unit laparoscopic hepatic resection of intrahepatic duct stone: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic bile duct stones, although common and benign, require varying therapeutic strategies due to their recurrent nature. Inadequate management can escalate to liver cirrhosis or cholangiocarcinoma. A surgical method merging indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) with liver cone unit resection is optimal, ensuring complete lesion removal and healthy liver tissue conservation. METHOD: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 15 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones who were admitted to Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. All patients underwent laparoscopic anatomical liver resection guided by ICG-FI. RESULTS: Among the 15 patients included in the study, ten were male and five were female, with an average age of 52 years. All patients were free from underlying medical conditions. Intraoperatively, ICG-FI was good, with clear boundaries, and all patients successfully underwent surgery without any conversions to open surgery. The mean operative time was 236 ± 56 min, and the estimated blood loss was 320 ± 75 ml. Patients had a postoperative hospital stay of 5.5 ± 1.5 days. No severe complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time ICG-FI with anatomical liver resection is a safe and effective approach for managing intrahepatic bile duct stones.

Right-Lateral Pringle Maneuver Using Endovascular Clip for Open and Laparoscopic Hepatectomy After Esophagectomy (with Video).

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy after esophageal cancer surgery is a technically challenging procedure as it is difficult to control hepatic inflow due to adhesion 1. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 22:344-349; 2. Dis Esophagus. 28:483-487; 3. Surg Endosc. 35:5375-5380; 4. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 23:e103-105. Thus, we introduce our technique for hepatic inflow control using an endovascular clip. METHODS: After the confirmation of space between the right and dorsal side of the hepatoduodenal ligament and the inferior vena cava, an endovascular clip was introduced laterally from the right side of the hepatoduodenal ligament to control hepatic inflow. The control of hepatic inflow was confirmed using intraoperative Doppler ultrasound and then a hepatic parenchymal transection was performed. The video demonstrates our technique using an endovascular clip for hepatic inflow control to perform safe open or laparoscopic hepatectomy after esophageal cancer surgery. Patient 1 was an 82-year-old woman with a history of laparoscopic assisted esophagectomy for esophageal neuroendocrine cancer. She underwent open anatomical resection of segment 3 for a 38-mm liver tumor. Patient 2 was a 71-year-old man with a history of laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. He underwent laparoscopic partial resection of segment 6 for a 24-mm liver tumor. RESULTS: The operation times were 105 and 123 min, and the estimated blood loss was 30 g and 10 g, respectively. The patients' postoperative courses were uneventful and the patients were discharged on postoperative days 9 and 8, respectively. CONCLUSION: Right-lateral Pringle maneuver using an endovascular clip may be a safe and feasible technique in both open and laparoscopic hepatectomy after esophagectomy.

Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for a Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Segment VI (Video).

INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma located in hepatic segment VI/VII or close to the adrenal gland were generally considered challenging for minimally invasive resection. For these individualized patients, this may be overcome by the novel use of a retroperitoneal laparoscopic hepatectomy; however, minimally invasive retroperitoneal liver resection is difficult to perform.1-3 This video article demonstrates a pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic hepatectomy for a subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma. VIDEO: A 47-year-old male patient with Child-Pugh A liver cirrhosis presented with a small tumor located very close to the adrenal gland next to segment VI of the liver. An enhanced abdominal computed tomographic scan demonstrated a solitary 2.3 × 1.6 cm lesion. Considering the special location of the lesion, a pure retroperitoneal laparoscopic hepatectomy was performed after obtaining the patient's consent. The patient was positioned in the flank position. The procedure was carried out using the balloon technique for a retroperitoneoscopic approach, with the patient in the lateral kidney position. The retroperitoneal space was first accessed through a 12-mm skin incision above the anterior superior iliac spine in the mid-axillary line and was expanded by inflating a glove balloon to 900 mL. A 5 mm port below the 12th rib in the posterior axillary line and a 12 mm port below the 12th rib in the anterior axillary line were placed. Following incision of Gerota's fascia, the dissection plane between the perirenal fat and the anterior renal fascia located at the superomedial side of the kidney was explored. The retroperitoneum behind the liver was fully exposed after the upper pole of the kidney was isolated. After localization of the tumor by intraoperative ultrasonography through the retroperitoneum, the retroperitoneum was dissected directly above the tumor. We used an ultrasonic scalpel to divide the hepatic parenchyma, and a Biclamp for hemostasis. The blood vessel was clamped using titanic clips, and the specimen was extracted using a retrieval bag following resection. A drainage tube was placed after completing meticulous hemostasis. Closure of the retroperitoneum was performed using a conventional suture method. RESULTS: The total operation time was 249 min, with an estimated blood loss of 30 mL. The final histopathological diagnosis showed a 3.0 × 2.2 × 2.0 cm-sized hepatocellular carcinoma. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6 without any complications. CONCLUSION: Lesions located in segment VI/VII or close to the adrenal gland were generally considered difficult for minimally invasive resection. Under these circumstances, a retroperitoneal laparoscopic hepatectomy might be a more suitable option as it is a safe, effective and complementary approach to standard minimally invasive technology for the resection of small hepatic tumors in these special locations of the liver.

An integrated strategy for deciding open versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for resectable primary liver cancer.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is now widely performed in treating primary liver cancer (PLC) and yields equal long-term and superior short-term outcomes to those of open liver resection (OLR). The optimal surgical approach for resectable PLC (rPLC) remains controversial. Herein, we aimed to develop a nomogram to determine the most appropriate resection approach for the individual patient. METHODS: Patients with rPLC who underwent hepatectomy from January 2013 to December 2018 were reviewed. Prediction model for risky surgery during LLR was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 900 patients in the LLR cohort and 423 patients in the OLR cohort were included. A history of previous antitumor treatment, tumor diameter, tumor location and resection extent were independently associated with risky surgery of LLR. The nomogram which was constructed based on these risk factors demonstrated good accuracy in predicting risky surgery with a C index of 0.83 in the development cohort and of 0.76 in the validation cohort. Patients were stratified into high-, medium- or low-risk levels for receiving LLR if the calculated score was more than 0.8, between 0.2 and 0.8 or less than 0.2, respectively. High-risk patients who underwent LLR had more blood loss (441 ml to 417 ml) and a longer surgery time (183 min to 150 min) than those who received OLR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients classified into the high-risk level for LLR instead undergo OLR to reduce surgical risks and complications and patients classified into the low-risk level undergo LLR to maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100049446).

Comparison of two doses of intrathecal morphine in laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection is an effective postoperative analgesic strategy in open or laparoscopic donor hepatectomy; however, the optimal dose has not been determined. In this trial, we compared the post-operative analgesic effects of two doses (300 vs. 400 µg) of ITM injections. METHODS: In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial, 56 donors were divided into either the 300 µg or 400 µg ITM group (n = 28, each). The primary outcome was the resting pain score at 24 h postoperatively. Pain scores, cumulative opioid consumption, and side effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV]) were compared up to 48 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-five donors participated in the entire study. The mean resting pain scores at 24 h after surgery were 1.7 ± 1.6 and 1.7 ± 1.1 in the ITM 300 and ITM 400 groups, respectively (mean difference, 0 [95% CI, -.8 to .7], p = .978). The upper limit of the 95% CI was lower than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (δ = 1), indicating that non-inferiority had been established. The incidence of PONV was lower in the ITM 300 group than in the ITM 400 group at 18 (p = .035) and 24 h postoperatively (p = .015). There were no significant differences in the resting and coughing pain scores and cumulative opioid consumption at any time point. CONCLUSION: For laparoscopic donor hepatectomy, preoperative ITM 300 µg exhibited non-inferior postoperative analgesic effects compared to ITM 400 µg, with a lower incidence of PONV.

The pharmacokinetics and safety of lidocaine in liver cancer patients undergoing hepatic resection.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetics (PK) characteristics and safety of continuous lidocaine infusion during hepatectomy in liver cancer patients. METHODS: This study included thirty-five patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy from January 2021 to December 2021. Patients received a short infusion of 1% lidocaine at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg based on ideal body weight, followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg/kg/h during the operation. The plasma concentrations of lidocaine and its active metabolites were measured using validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by monitoring and recording all adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The concentrations of lidocaine were within the safe range, except one patient's concentration of lidocaine which reached the toxic range (> 5 µg/mL). The mean half-life (T1/2), the mean time to maximum observed concentration (Tmax), and the mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) of lidocaine were 3.96 h, 2.85 h, and 2030 ng/mL, respectively; the mean T1/2, Tmax, and Cmax (n = 32) of MEGX were 6.59 h, 5.05 h, and 333.28 ng/mL, respectively; and the mean T1/2, Tmax, and Cmax of GX (n = 18) were 25.98 h, 7.33 h, and 75.81 ng/mL. Although eight subjects with AEs were reported, there were no serious AEs or deaths. No patients had serious postoperative complications. No deaths occurred within 30 days after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Under the administration regimen of this study, intravenous infusion of lidocaine is safe and tolerable for liver cancer patients with laparoscopic hepatectomy. Fine safety and PK characteristics support the application of lidocaine in such patients and further clinical research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100042730), Registered 27 January 2021.

Caudodorsal approach combined with in situ split for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) was technically challenging and lack of standardization. There were some approaches for LRPS, such as caudal approach and dorsal approach. During our practice, we initiated pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split and present several advantages of this method. METHODS: From April 2018 to December 2021, consecutive patients who underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split at our institution entered into this retrospective study. The key point of the caudodorsal approach was that the right hepatic vein was exposed from peripheral branches toward the root and the parenchyma was transected from the dorsal side to ventral side. Specially, the right perihepatic ligaments were not divided to keep the right liver in situ before parenchymal dissection for each case. RESULTS: 11 patients underwent pure LRPS using the caudodorsal approach with in situ split. There were 9 hepatocellular carcinoma, 1 sarcomatoid hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1 hepatic hemangioma. Five patients had mild cirrhosis and 1 had moderate cirrhosis. All the procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically. The median operative time was 375 min (range of 290-505 min) and the median blood loss was 300 ml (range of 100-1000 ml). Five patients received perioperative blood transfusion, of which 1 patient received autologous blood transfusion and 2 patients received blood transfusion due to preoperative moderate anemia. No procedure was converted to open surgery. Two patients who suffered from postoperative complications, improved after conservative treatments. The median postoperative stay was 11 days (range of 7-25 days). No postoperative bleeding, hepatic failure, and mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: The preliminary clinical effect of the caudodorsal approach with in situ split for LRPS was satisfactory. Our method was feasible and expected to provide ideas for the standardization of LRPS. Further researches are required due to some limitations of this study.

Association of standardized liver volume and body mass index with outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections.

INTRODUCTION: While minimally invasive liver resections (MILR) have demonstrated advantages in improved post-operative recovery, widespread adoption is hampered by inherent technical difficulties. Our study attempts to analyze the role of anthropometric measures in MILR-related outcomes. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2020, 676 consecutive patients underwent MILR at the Singapore General Hospital of which 565 met study criteria and were included. Patients were stratified based on Body Mass Index (BMI) as well as Standardized Liver Volumes (SLV). Associations between BMI and SLV to selected peri-operative outcomes were analyzed using restricted cubic splines. RESULTS: A BMI of ≥ 29 was associated with increase in blood loss [Mean difference (MD) 69 mls, 95% CI 2 to 137] as well as operative conversions [Relative Risk (RR) 1.63, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.62] among patients undergoing MILR while a SLV of 1600 cc or higher was associated with an increase in blood loss (MD 30 mls, 95% CI 10 to 49). In addition, a BMI of ≤ 20 was associated with an increased risk of major complications (RR 2.25, 95% 1.16 to 4.35). The magnitude of differences observed in these findings increased with each unit change in BMI and SLV. CONCLUSION: Both BMI and SLV were useful anthropometric measures in predicting peri-operative outcomes in MILR and may be considered for incorporation in future difficulty scoring systems for MILR.