RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study is to explore the extent of missed nursing care in Turkey and identify its predictors. DESIGN: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study. METHODS: A total of 477 nurses working in seven public hospitals participated in this study from March to July 2019. The survey included two components: a personal and professional characteristics data form and the MISSCARE survey. RESULTS: The study revealed that emotional support, patient bathing and ambulation were the most frequently missed nursing care activities. An inadequate number of assistive personnel and staff, along with an unexpected increase in patient volume, were identified as the primary reasons for missed nursing care. Of the 21 missed nursing care activities, nine predictive models showed statistical significance (p < 0.05). Factors such as the type of unit, years of work experience, working hours, number of patients cared for in a shift and intention to leave the unit were found to be significant predictors of seven missed nursing care activities (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study found that numerous variables influence each care activity, which suggests the need to devise more targeted and specific strategies to minimize missed nursing care. Thorough investigation into the impact of these strategies on each care activity is essential.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Hospitales Públicos , Atención de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Públicos/normas , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención de Enfermería/métodos , Atención de Enfermería/normas , Atención de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/provisión & distribución , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Turquía/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Measuring missed nursing care in clinical settings may serve as an important indicator for improving patient safety and nursing staff retention. Internationally, several tools exist, with the MISSCARE Survey being the most frequently used and validated; however, no tools are available in the Danish language. AIM: This study aimed at translating the MISSCARE Survey from US English to Danish and evaluate its psychometric properties. METHODS: The translation followed the recommended method, that is forward-and-backward translation, involving clinical experts and a professional, native English-speaking translator. The final version was approved by the survey's original developer. Face validity was tested among 10 nurses and 1 practical nurse. Nursing staff from 34 selected departments at Aarhus University Hospital's (n = 1241) were invited to participate in a pilot test in November 2020. The survey consisted of a demographic section, a section of 'nursing elements' (Part A) and section of 'reasons' (Part B). Acceptability was assessed on Part A and B. Reliability was tested by Cronbach's alpha, and psychometric properties were investigated using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Part B). RESULTS: The face-validity test resulted in minor contextual changes and the addition of a 'not applicable' response option in Part A. The pilot test had a 42.6% response rate (n = 529). Acceptability was good, with 1-10 missing responses per item in Part A and 0-20 missing responses in Part B. The numbers of 'not applicable' responses ranged from 0 to 81. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.81. Factor-loading ranges were 0.62-0.48 for 'communication', 0.79-0.39 for 'materials and resources', and 0.50-0.35 for 'labour', suggesting an acceptable fit with the theoretical model. CONCLUSION: The MISSCARE Survey was successfully translated into Danish. The psychometric properties confirmed the questionnaire as a valid and reliable tool for measuring missed nursing care in Danish hospital settings.
Asunto(s)
Atención de Enfermería , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Psicometría/métodos , Lenguaje , DinamarcaRESUMEN
AIM: This study aimed to compare perception of nurses about missed care for the patients before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Jordan. It also examined how nurses differed in terms of the type of missed care and the factors that contributed to it before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, socio-demographic factors, including gender, educational level, length of clinical experience, work position, age, and type of shift, were examined to evaluate their association with missed nursing care. BACKGROUND: Missed nursing care refers to omission of any aspect of required patient care. Missed care lowers patient satisfaction and also leads to adverse hospital outcomes. METHODS: We adopted a cross-sectional design among 260 nurses working in medical/surgical wards and intensive care units. Views of 130 nurses before COVID-19 were compared with views of 130 nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used the Arabic version of the MISSCARE survey. Data were collected between November 2019 and May 2020. RESULTS: During COVID-19, nurses had significantly higher satisfaction levels and lower levels of absence and intention to leave than nurses before the COVID-19 pandemic. Differences were observed between nurses' perceptions of missed care before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. It was observed that missed nursing care increased during COVID-19. The inadequate number of staff nurses was the main reason for missed care activities among both groups. Additionally, age and shift type were significantly associated with an increased reason for missed nursing care among both groups. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses reported higher satisfaction levels and fewer absences and planned departures during this period. Nurse managers should pay attention by maintaining high satisfaction levels and formulating appropriate policies to reduce missed care levels and thus improve patient care quality.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
AIM: To conduct, translate, and psychometric evaluation of the MISSCARE-Persian Survey. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Iran in February-June 2021. METHODS: The translation of the MISSCARE Survey was accomplished according to World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Construct validity was performed by (N = 300) exploratory factor analysis and confirmation. To assess the reliability, internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and relative stability was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study adhered to COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS: The exploratory factor analysis, which resulted in the identification of three factors in the second part of the tool, explained 79.6% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the model's good fit of information. The reliability of the first and second parts of the tool was 0.912 and 0.901, respectively. Additionally, the ICC was found to be 0.687 for the first and 0.706 for the second part of the tool.
Asunto(s)
Traducciones , Psicometría/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Quality of care is one of the most critical issues in nursing care today. Moreover, all health care employees are responsible for providing support and high-quality, safe care. However, nurses caring for COVID-19 patients face problems such as unfamiliar work environments, exposure to the disease, lack of experience in their new positions, and close public and media attention. This study aimed to investigate missed nursing care and the reasons for missed nursing care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Iran. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 135 nurses working in COVID-19 units. Data were collected using the MISSCARE Survey. The significance level for the statistical tests was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Most of the participants were women and had a bachelor's degree in nursing. There was a lack of supportive and necessary care more than any other form of care. According to nurses, the most common reasons for missed care were urgent patient situations, inadequate staff, and an unexpected rise in patient volume and/or patient acuity on the unit. CONCLUSION: Generally, the results showed that being positioned in a new situation and unfamiliarity with the disease had a significant impact-among nurses-on the amount of care provided. Managers can use this information to solve existing missed-nursing-care problems and contribute to improving the quality of care. These results can be helpful in controlling missed nursing care and finding a more optimal solution for this problem; thus, we can improve the quality of care delivery and increase the satisfaction of nurses and patients. Additionally, an understanding of the kind of missing nursing care during a pandemic can positively enhance the management of similar situations in the future.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Atención de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Irán/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The main aims of the study were to explore the frequency of missed nursing care (MNC) among Czech hospital nurses, and to find the relationship between nurse's job satisfaction and MNC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 513 nurses from 9 hospitals in the Czech Republic. Data were collected in January-August 2019 using the standardized MISSCARE Survey questionnaire, complemented with items assessing nurse's job satisfaction and demographic data. RESULTS: The most frequently missed nursing activities were patient ambulation and emotional support to the patient and/or family. The surveyed nurses were most satisfied with being a nurse and least satisfied with the level of teamwork on their unit. The strongest correlation was found between satisfaction with the current position and satisfaction with being a nurse; there was a negative correlation between satisfaction with the current position and the overall level of MNC. There was a significant trend between the rating of satisfaction with the current position and MNC. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse's job satisfaction is associated with the level of nursing care provided; more missed care means more dissatisfaction among nurses. Med Pr. 2021;72(3):231-7.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Satisfacción Personal , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Missed nursing care is a concern on inpatient hospital units but has not been adequately explored in the perioperative setting. This cross-sectional study used results from a survey of 1,693 AORN members to investigate the amount and type of missed perioperative nursing care and evaluate associations between reported missed care and facility and nurse characteristics. The survey asked OR nurses how frequently specific care items were missed by themselves or others. Overall, nurses' perceptions of the frequency of missed care was 0.84 on a scale of 0 to 4 (0 = never, 4 = always). The survey items were categorized into five subscales: legal requirement, preparation, safety, communication, and closing routine. Nurses reported most missed care in the communication and preparation categories. The number of ORs at a facility, nurse education and job title, and perceptions of staffing adequacy were significantly associated with the perceived amount of missed perioperative nursing care.