Association between body mass index and electrocardiogram indices: A Mendelian randomization study.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain a global health concern, and body mass index (BMI) is known to be associated with an increased risk of CVD, but the exact mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear. This study employs Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal association between BMI and electrocardiogram (ECG) indices, providing insights into potential pathways linking obesity to CVD. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive MR study utilizing large-scale genetic and ECG data from diverse populations. Instrumental variables were selected from genome-wide association studies, ensuring their relevance to BMI. Causal relationships between BMI and ECG indices, including P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval, were assessed using various MR methods, with inverse variance weighted (IVW) considered as the primary analysis. RESULTS: Our MR analysis revealed a significant positive causal association between higher BMI and P wave duration (ß = 8.078, 95% CI: 5.322 to 10.833, p < 0.001), suggesting a potential mechanism through which higher BMI may contribute to arrhythmogenic risks. However, no significant causal associations were observed between BMI and PR interval, QRS duration, or QT interval (all p > 0.005). In addition, our study also found that there is no horizontal pleiotropy between BMI and P wave duration, PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval, suggesting that the conclusions of this study are robust. CONCLUSION: This study supports a causal relationship between elevated BMI and prolonged P wave duration, a marker of increased atrial arrhythmogenic risk. Further investigations are still needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Duración de la onda P en las 12 derivaciones del electrocardiograma y su relación con el tiempo de conducción interauricular en pacientes con taquicardias paroxísticas supraventriculares / P wave duration in the 12 leads of the electrocardiogram and its relationship with interatrial conduction time in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias

RESUMEN Introducción: Existen algunos estudios que relacionan parámetros de la onda P con diferentes tiempos de conducción auricular, pero no se han realizado teniendo en cuenta a cada derivación del electrocardiograma. Objetivo: Determinar la duración de la onda P (Pdur) en las 12 derivaciones y relacionarlas con el tiempo de conducción interauricular. Método: Estudio de corte transversal en 153 pacientes adultos con diagnóstico confirmado de taquicardia por reentrada intranodal (TRIN) o vías accesorias mediante estudio electrofisiológico invasivo. Resultados: Al comparar la Pdur entre sustratos arrítmicos por cada derivación, no existieron diferencias significativas, excepto en V6. En las derivaciones DII, DIII, aVR, aVF, V1 y de V3-V6 la Pdur se correlacionó con el tiempo de conducción interauricular en ambos sustratos arrítmicos. En el análisis multivariado, la Pdur constituyó un predictor independiente de tiempos de conducción interauricular ≥ 95 percentil, en las derivaciones de cara inferior y en V3, V5 y V6. Se observaron altos valores del área bajo la curva de la Característica Operativa del Receptor en las derivaciones DII (0,950; p<0,001), DIII (0,850; p<0,001) y V5 (0,891; p<0,001). Conclusiones: No existen diferencias por derivación en la Pdur al comparar casos con TRIN y vías accesorias, excepto en V6. La mayoría de las derivaciones se correlacionaron con el tiempo de conducción interauricular. La Pdur fue un predictor independiente de tiempos de conducción interauricular ≥ 95 percentil. La derivación DII presenta la mayor capacidad discriminativa para encontrar valores prolongados del tiempo de conducción interauricular.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Although some studies relate P wave parameters to different atrial conduction times, they do not consider each electrocardiogram lead separately. Objective: To determine the duration of P wave (Pdur) in the 12 leads of the electrocardiogram and relate it to the interatrial conduction time. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 153 adult patients with confirmed diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) or accessory pathways by invasive electrophysiological study. Results: When comparing the Pdur between arrhythmic substrates by each lead, no significant differences were found, except for V6. In leads II, III, aVR, aVF, V1 and V3-V6, Pdur was correlated with the interatrial conduction time in both arrhythmic substrates. In our multivariate analysis, the Pdur was an independent predictor of interatrial conduction times ≥ 95 percentile in inferior wall leads and in V3, V5 and V6. High values of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were observed in II (0.950; p<0.001), III (0.850; p<0.001) and V5 (0.891; p<0.001) leads. Conclusions: The Pdur showed no difference by leads when comparing cases with AVNRT and accessory pathways, except for V6. Most of the leads were correlated with the interatrial conduction time; Pdur was an independent predictor of interatrial conduction times ≥ 95 percentile. Lead II has the greatest discriminatory ability to find prolonged values of interatrial conduction time.