Pancreas units within gastroenterology departments. Organizational and operational standards for a patient-centered service. / Las unidades de páncreas en los servicios de aparato digestivo. Estándares de organización y funcionamiento para un servicio centrado en el paciente.

The Asociación Española de Pancreatología (AESPANC), Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG), and Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD) have developed a consensus document on the standards and recommendations they consider essential for the organization of pancreas units (PUs) within gastroenterology services (GSs) in order to conduct their activities in an efficient, high-quality manner. The consensus document defines PUs and lays down standards relating to their organization, structure, service portfolio, processes, and teaching and research activities. Standards have been categorized as mandatory (requirements to be met to qualify for certification by the scientific societies responsible for the standards) or recommendations. Standards should be updated at most within five years based on the experience gained in Spanish PUs and the advance of knowledge regarding pancreas disease. Development of health outcome indicators, including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), is considered a relevant challenge, as is evidence on the association of PU structure and activity standards with health outcomes.

[Utility of the AGREE tool for the development and evaluation of clinical protocols: From theory to clinical practice]. / Utilidad del instrumento AGREE para la elaboración y la evaluación de protocolos clínicos: de la teoría a la práctica clínica.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical protocols are tools for the delivery of optimal and quality healthcare. However, there are often shortcomings in the quality of their design that invalidate their implementation. The aim of this study is to describe a systematic evaluation of clinical protocols, to analyse their quality in order to enable their implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Descriptive study that included the clinical protocols assessed by the Committee of Reviewers of Clinical Practice Recommendations and Health Technologies of a tertiary hospital during 11years of its existence between 2013 and 2023. The AGREE instrument was used to assess the quality of the protocols received, calculating standardised scores by item and domain, and categorising them into: a)excellent (90-100%), b)good (70-89%), c)improvable (50-69%), d)very improvable (30-49%), e)deficient (10-29%), and f)very deficient: 0-9%. RESULTS: Of the 59 documents received by the Commission, 32 were subsidised for AGREE evaluation. The highest scoring domain was «Scope and objective¼, with excellent scores for 29 protocols; the remaining domains had scores ranging from 58.5%-100% for «Rigour in elaboration¼ and 0-100% for «Independence¼. By items, scores ranged from 85.7-100% for «Target users of the protocol are clearly defined¼ to 0-100% for the items «Potential costs of implementing recommendations¼ and «Conflict of interest¼. Of the 32 protocols, 9 were highly recommended, 22 were recommended with modifications/conditions and one was not recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The AGREE tool makes it possible to systematize both the drafting of clinical protocols by the authors and their evaluation by the Clinical Practice Recommendations and Health Technologies Review Committee. This makes it possible to have applicable and quality protocols in our hospital, which results in an improvement in the quality of healthcare.

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs palliative care: A systematic review. / [Artículo traducido] Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by two independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Out of the 5,791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1,050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4,741), and full reading (n = 41), only one study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to two groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only one of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs) and decrease the monthly costs of pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the impact on patient safety and humanistic outcomes remain unclear.

[Translated article] Genetic variants and enzyme activity in citidin deaminase: Relationship with capecitabine toxicity and recommendation for dose adjustment.

OBJECTIVE: Capecitabine, an antineoplastic drug used in the treatment of breast and colon cancer, can cause severe, even fatal toxicity in some patients. The interindividual variability of this toxicity is largely due to genetic variations in target genes and enzymes of metabolism of this drug, such as Thymidylate Synthase (TS) and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD). The enzyme Cytidine Deaminase (CDA), involved in the activation of capecitabine, also has several variants associated with an increased risk of toxicity to treatment, although its role as a biomarker is not yet clearly defined. Therefore, our main objective is to study the association between the presence of genetic variants in CDA gen, CDA enzymatic activity and the development of severe toxicity in patients treated with capecitabine whose initial dose was adjusted based on the genetic profile of the DPD gen (DPYD). METHOD: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study, focused on the analysis of the genotype-phenotype association of the CDA enzyme. After the experimental phase, an algorithm will be developed to determine the dose adjustment needed to reduce the risk of treatment toxicity according to CDA genotype, developing a Clinical Guide for capecitabine dosing according to genetic variants in DPYD and CDA. Based on this guide, a Bioinformatics Tool will be created to generate the pharmacotherapeutic report automatically, facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetic advice in clinical practice. This tool will be a great support in making pharmacotherapeutic decisions based on the patient's genetic profile, incorporating precision medicine into clinical routine. Once the usefulness of this tool has been validated, it will be offered free of charge to facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetics in hospital centers and equitably benefit all patients on capecitabine treatment.

Genetic variants and enzyme activity in citidin deaminase: Relationship with capecitabine toxicity and recommendation for dose adjustment. / Variantes genéticas y actividad enzimática de la citidin desaminasa: relación con la toxicidad a la capecitabina y recomendación de ajuste de las dosis.

OBJECTIVE: Capecitabine, an antineoplastic drug used in the treatment of breast and colon cancer, can cause severe, even fatal toxicity in some patients. The interindividual variability of this toxicity is largely due to genetic variations in target genes and enzymes of metabolism of this drug, such as thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. The enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDA), involved in the activation of capecitabine, also has several variants associated with an increased risk of toxicity to treatment, although its role as a biomarker is not yet clearly defined. Therefore, our main objective is to study the association between the presence of genetic variants in CDA gen, CDA enzymatic activity and the development of severe toxicity in patients treated with capecitabine whose initial dose was adjusted based on the genetic profile of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gen (DPYD). METHOD: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study, focused on the analysis of the genotype-phenotype association of the CDA enzyme. After the experimental phase, an algorithm will be developed to determine the dose adjustment needed to reduce the risk of treatment toxicity according to CDA genotype, developing a clinical guide for capecitabine dosing according to genetic variants in DPYD and CDA. Based on this guide, a Bioinformatics Tool will be created to generate the pharmacotherapeutic report automatically, facilitating the implementation of pharmacogenetic advice in clinical practice. This tool will be a great support in making pharmacotherapeutic decisions based on the patient's genetic profile, incorporating precision medicine into clinical routine. Once the usefulness of this tool has been validated, it will be offered free of charge to facilitate the implementation of pharmacogenetics in hospital centers and equitably benefit all patients on capecitabine treatment.

[Translated article] Evaluation of the antibiotic prescription in a hospital emergency department: Pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: A study about the adherence of the antimicrobial prescriptions to the local guidelines of treatment of infections was conducted in a hospital emergency department to study the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the patients who received these treatments. Conducting a feasibility study for supporting the design and execution of future studies, addressing specific aspects of the appropriateness of the antimicrobial prescription. METHOD: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional pilot study, with retrospective data collection about the antimicrobial prescription in a hospital emergency department. Seven cross sections were made, corresponding to seven different days of the week, in seven consecutive weeks. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patient over 14 years of age, with at least one first dose of antimicrobial treatment prescribed on the day of recruitment. The main variable was the inappropriate antimicrobial prescription according to the local guidelines. Epidemiological and clinical parameters of the patients were collected as secondary variables. In order to determine inappropriate prescription a revision was carried out by two specialists in emergencies, two pharmacists and one specialist in infectious diseases, all unrelated to prescriptions. RESULTS: 168 patients with 192 prescriptions were evaluated. Seventy-six (39.6%) of the prescriptions were not conformed to the local treatment guidelines. Of these, 55% were with active antimicrobial coverage against the microorganism but not recommended, 23.5% with inactive drugs, 13.7% presented an inappropriate dose and 7.8% were unnecessary treatment. The strength of agreement in the evaluation of the adequacy of treatment between doctors and pharmacists was high (kappa = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions was obtained in a hospital emergency department according to local guidelines. The hospital pharmacist has an opportunity to improve the use of antimicrobials in this area.

Evaluation of the antibiotic prescription in a hospital emergency department: Pilot study. / Evaluación de la prescripción de antibióticos en un servicio de urgencias hospitalarias: estudio piloto.

OBJECTIVE: A study about the adherence of the antimicrobial prescriptions to the local guidelines of treatment of infections was conducted in a hospital emergency department to study the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the patients who received these treatments. Conducting a feasibility study for supporting the design and execution of future studies, addressing specific aspects of the appropriateness of the antimicrobial prescription. METHOD: Observational, descriptive and cross-sectional pilot study, with retrospective data collection about the antimicrobial prescription in a hospital emergency department. Seven cross sections were made, corresponding to 7 different days of the week, in 7 consecutive weeks. INCLUSION CRITERIA: patient over 14 years of age, with at least one first dose of antimicrobial treatment prescribed on the day of recruitment. The main variable was the inappropriate antimicrobial prescription according to the local guidelines. Epidemiological and clinical parameters of the patients were collected as secondary variables. In order to determine inappropriate prescription a revision was carried out by 2 specialists in emergencies, 2 pharmacists and one specialist in infectious diseases, all unrelated to prescriptions. RESULTS: One hundred sixty eight patients with 192 prescriptions were evaluated. 76 (39.6%) of the prescriptions were not conformed to the local treatment guidelines. Of these, 55% were with active antimicrobial coverage against the microorganism but not recommended, 23.5% with inactive drugs, 13.7% presented an inappropriate dose and 7.8% were unnecessary treatment. The strength of agreement in the evaluation of the adequacy of treatment between doctors and pharmacists was high (kappa=0.71). CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of inappropriate antimicrobial prescriptions was obtained in a hospital emergency department according to local guidelines. The hospital pharmacist has an opportunity to improve the use of antimicrobials in this area.

Evaluation of the lingual frenulum in newborns using two protocols and its association with breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the lingual frenulum of full-term newborns using two different protocols and to assess the association of the lingual frenulum with breastfeeding. METHODS: This non-probabilistic sample consisted of 449 mother/baby binomials. For the anatomo-functional evaluation of the frenulum, the Neonatal Tongue Screening Test and the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool were used for the evaluation of the lingual frenulum. Breastfeeding was evaluated using the protocol proposed by UNICEF. Scores were created (good, fair, poor) to evaluate every aspect of the breastfeeding to be observed. The results were analyzed through descriptive and inferential statistics and association tests (Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact test). RESULTS: The study showed that 14 babies had a lingual frenulum alteration, of whom three had difficulties during suction, requiring frenotomy in the first week of life, whereas 11 had no difficulties during breastfeeding. Regarding the breastfeeding evaluation, 410mother/baby binomials had good, 36 regular, and three had bad scores. There was a statistically significant association between the tongue-tie test protocol and breastfeeding (p=0.028) and between the Bristol Tongue Assessment Tool protocol and breastfeeding (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: Alterations in the lingual frenulum are associated with interferences in the quality of breastfeeding and thus, evaluation of the lingual frenulum in newborns is important.

Central venous catheter insertion and maintenance: Evidence-based clinical recommendations / Inserción y mantenimiento del catéter venoso central: recomendaciones clínicas basadas en la evidencia

OBJECTIVE: To share with clinicians supporting evidence of the safest and the most effective processes for central venous catheter insertion and maintenance as a strategy to prevent catheter-associated bloodstream infections. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the Medline via PubMed, Embase Central and Lilacs databases based on a set of clinical questions aimed at improving safety and effectiveness at key moments in the process of central venous catheter insertion and maintenance. The rapid literature review methodology was used. The studies identified were assessed from the quality point of view, using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools for qualitative and quantitative studies and for systematic reviews. Clinical practice guidelines were assessed using the AGREE II tool. The evidence is presented in the form of evidence-based clinical recommendations, which were graded in accordance with the JBI methodology. RESULTS: Twelve clinical evidence summaries containing evidence related to the safe and effective use of central venous catheters are presented, including the following topics: central venous catheter insertion (CVC), peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC), preoperative assessment, the use of analgesia, field preparation, choice between CVC or PICC, CVC care and maintenance, prevention of complications, and general considerations pertaining to the use of central venous catheters in oncologic patients and in parenteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations on the safe and effective use of central venous access catheters in relation to CVC insertion and maintenance processes are presented in the evidence-based summary model. It is necessary to evaluate their implementation in health outcomes in the institutions where they are developed.

TITULO: INSERCIÓN Y MANTENIMIENTO DEL CATÉTER VENOSO CENTRAL: RECOMENDACIONES CLÍNICAS BASADAS EN LA EVIDENCIA. OBJETIVO: Presentar a los clínicos la evidencia que soporta los procesos más seguros y efectivos en la inserción y el mantenimiento del catéter venoso central (CVC), como estrategia en la prevención de las infecciones del torrente sanguíneo asociadas a catéter. METODOS: A partir de preguntas clínicas dirigidas a mejorar la seguridad y efectividad de los procesos de inserción y mantenimiento de catéter venoso, en los momentos clave, se hicieron búsquedas de literatura en las bases de datos Medline vía PubMed, Embase, Central y Lilacs. Se utilizó la metodología de revisión sistemática rápida de la literatura. Los estudios identificados fueron evaluados desde el punto de vista de la calidad con las herramientas para estudios cualitativos, cuantitativos y revisiones sistemáticas del Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Las guías de práctica clínicas fueron evaluadas con el instrumento AGREE II. La evidencia se presenta como recomendaciones clínicas basadas en la evidencia, a las cuales se les dio gradación, según la metodología del JBI. RESULTADOS: Se presentan 12 resúmenes clínicos que contienen la evidencia relacionada con el uso seguro y efectivo del catéter venoso central en cuanto a: las indicaciones, la inserción del catéter en venas centrales y en inserción periférica (PICC), la valoración prequirúrgica, el uso de analgesia, la preparación del campo, la selección entre CVC o PICC, el cuidado y mantenimiento de CVC, la prevención de complicaciones y consideraciones generales en el uso de catéter venoso central (CVC) en el paciente oncológico y en nutrición parenteral. CONCLUSIONES: Se presentan las recomendaciones para el uso seguro y efectivo de los catéteres de acceso venoso central con relación a los procesos de inserción y mantenimiento de CVC en el modelo de resúmenes basados en la evidencia. Es necesario hacer evaluación de la implementación de los mismos en resultados en salud en las instituciones donde se desarrollen.

Implantação de protocolo assistencial voltado a pessoas com úlceras venosas na atenção primária a saúde / Implementation of assistant protocol tailored to people with venous ulcers in primary health care / Implementación de protocolo asistente a la medida de personas con úlceras venosas en atención primaria de salud

Objetivo: Relatar a experiência da implantação de um protocolo assistencial voltado a pessoas com úlceras vasculares com foco nas úlceras venosas na atenção primária a saúde. Método:Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, realizado de março a julho de 2023, no Distrito Sanitário do Subúrbio Ferroviário, Salvador/BA. Resultados: A elaboração de um protocolo assistencial para pessoas com úlceras vasculares, com foco nas úlceras venosas, contou com apoio da enfermeira distrital, duas enfermeiras da assistência e um médico clínico e com a implementação dor referido protocolo por meio de reuniões online e presenciais para treinamento da verificação do índice tornozelo-braquial. Considerações finais:A elaboração do protocolo poderá favorecer a organização das unidades da atenção primária de modo que as pessoas portadoras de úlceras venosas possam receber um cuidado prestado de forma integral, holística e humanizada pelos profissionais que compõem a atenção primária a saúde.

Objective: To report the experience of implementing a care protocol aimed at people with vascular ulcers with a focus on venous ulcers in primary health care. Methodology: This is a descriptive study, carried out from March to July 2023, in the Health District of Subúrbio Ferroviário, Salvador/BA. Results: The development of a care protocol for people with vascular ulcers, focusing on venous ulcers, had the support of the district nurse, two care nurses and a clinical doctor and the implementation of this protocol through online and in-person meetings to training in checking the ankle-brachial index. Final considerations: The development of the protocol may favor the organization of primary care units so that people with venous ulcers can receive care provided in an integral, holistic and humanized manner by professionals who make up primary health care.

Objetivo: Reportar la experiencia de implementación de un protocolo de atención dirigido a personas con úlceras vasculares con enfoque en úlceras venosas en la atención primaria de salud. Metodología:Se trata de un estudio descriptivo, realizado de marzo a julio de2023, en el Distrito de Salud del Subúrbio Ferroviário, Salvador/BA. Resultados:El desarrollo de un protocolo de atención a personas con úlceras vasculares, con foco en las úlceras venosas, contó con el apoyo de la enfermera distrital, dos enfermeras asistenciales y un médico clínico y la implementación de este protocolo a través de reuniones online y presenciales para capacitaciones en comprobando el índice tobillo-brazo. Consideraciones finales: El desarrollo del protocolo puede favorecer la organización de las unidades de atención primaria para que las personas con úlceras venosas puedan recibir una atención brindada de manera integral, holística y humanizada por los profesionales que integran la atención primaria de salud.

Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review / Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes que reciben cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática

Objectives: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Results: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs)...(AU)

Objetivo: Los pacientes con enfermedades terminales son propensos a la polifarmacia innecesaria. Las herramientas de desprescripción pueden contribuir a minimizar los resultados negativos. Por lo tanto, los objetivos del estudio fueron identificar instrumentos validados para la desprescripción de medicamentos inapropiados en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos y evaluar el impacto en los resultados clínicos, humanísticos y económicos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE y WEB OF SCIENCE (hasta mayo de 2021). Se realizó una búsqueda manual en las referencias de los artículos incluidos. La selección, elegibilidad, extracción y evaluación del riesgo de sesgo se llevaron a cabo por dos investigadores independientes. Se aceptó la inclusión de estudios observacionales y experimentales. Resultados: De los 5791 estudios recuperados, después de excluir duplicados (n = 1050), realizar la selección de títulos/resúmenes (n = 4741) y la lectura completa (n = 41), solo un estudio cumplió con los criterios de inclusión. En este estudio incluido, se realizó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado, que mostró un alto nivel de riesgo de sesgo en general. A los adultos de 75 años o más (n = 130) con esperanza de vida limitada y polifarmacia se les asignaron dos grupos [grupo de intervención (desprescripción) y grupo de control (atención habitual)]. Se realizó la desprescripción con la ayuda de la herramienta STOPPFrail. El número promedio de medicamentos inapropiados y los costos mensuales de los medicamentos fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo de intervención. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en términos de presentaciones hospitalarias no programadas, caídas, fracturas, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Conclusiones: A pesar de la disponibilidad de varias herramientas para apoyar la deprescripción en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos...(AU)

Instrumentos validados de desprescripción de medicamentos para los pacientes que reciben cuidados paliativos: una revisión sistemática / Validated medication deprescribing instruments for patients with palliative care needs: a systematic review

Objectives: Patients with life-limiting illnesses are prone to unnecessary polypharmacy. Deprescribing tools may contribute to minimizing negative outcomes. Thus, the aims of the study were to identify validated instruments for deprescribing inappropriate medications for patients with palliative care needs and to assess the impact on clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE, and WEB OF SCIENCE databases (until May 2021). A manual search was performed in the references of enrolled articles. The screening, eligibility, extraction, and bias risk assessment were carried out by 2 independent researchers. Experimental and observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Results: Out of the 5791 studies retrieved, after excluding duplicates (n = 1050), conducting title/abstract screening (n = 4741), and full reading (n = 41), only 1 study met the inclusion criteria. In this included study, a randomized controlled trial was conducted, which showed a high level of bias risk overall. Adults 75 years or older (n = 130) with limited life expectancy and polypharmacy were allocated to 2 groups [intervention arm (deprescribing); and control arm (usual care)]. Deprescribing was performed with the aid of the STOPPFrail tool. The mean number of inappropriate medications and monthly medication costs were significantly lower in the intervention arm. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of unscheduled hospital presentations, falls, fractures, mortality, and quality of life. Conclusions: Despite the availability of several instruments to support deprescribing in patients with palliative care needs, only 1 of them has undergone validation and robust assessment for effectiveness in clinical practice. The STOPPFrail tool appears to reduce the number of inappropriate medications for older people with limited life expectancy (and probably palliative care needs)...(AU)

Objetivo: Los pacientes con enfermedades terminales son propensos a la polifarmacia innecesaria. Las herramientas de desprescripción pueden contribuir a minimizar los resultados negativos. Por lo tanto, los objetivos del estudio fueron identificar instrumentos validados para la desprescripción de medicamentos inapropiados en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos y evaluar el impacto en los resultados clínicos, humanísticos y económicos. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en las bases de datos LILACS, PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE y WEB OF SCIENCE (hasta mayo de 2021). Se realizó una búsqueda manual en las referencias de los artículos incluidos. La selección, elegibilidad, extracción y evaluación del riesgo de sesgo se llevaron a cabo por dos investigadores independientes. Se aceptó la inclusión de estudios observacionales y experimentales. Resultados: De los 5791 estudios recuperados, después de excluir duplicados (n = 1050), realizar la selección de títulos/resúmenes (n = 4741) y la lectura completa (n = 41), solo un estudio cumplió con los criterios de inclusión. En este estudio incluido, se realizó un ensayo controlado aleatorizado, que mostró un alto nivel de riesgo de sesgo en general. A los adultos de 75 años o más (n = 130) con esperanza de vida limitada y polifarmacia se les asignaron dos grupos [grupo de intervención (desprescripción) y grupo de control (atención habitual)]. Se realizó la desprescripción con la ayuda de la herramienta STOPPFrail. El número promedio de medicamentos inapropiados y los costos mensuales de los medicamentos fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo de intervención. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en términos de presentaciones hospitalarias no programadas, caídas, fracturas, mortalidad y calidad de vida. Conclusiones: A pesar de la disponibilidad de varias herramientas para apoyar la deprescripción en pacientes con necesidades de cuidados paliativos...(AU)

Implementation of the Fast-track Protocol for Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Public Hospital in the State of São Paulo - Brazil / Implantação do protocolo de recuperação rápida para artroplastia total do quadril em hospital público do estado de São Paulo - Brasil

Abstract Objective Evaluate the results of the implementation of the Fast Track Protocol (FTP), a medical practice based on scientific evidence, for elective total hip arthroplasty surgery, mainly comparing the National Average Hospital Admission Rate of 7.1 days. Methods 98 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty surgery via the direct anterior approach, anterolateral approach and posterior approach were included in the FTP from December 2018 to March 2020, being followed up preoperatively, intraoperatively and immediately postoperatively. Results The average length of hospital stay was 2.8 days, being 2.1 days for the direct anterior approach, 3.0 days for the anterolateral access approach and 4.1 days for the posterior access approach. The average surgery time was 90 minutes, 19 (19.39%) of the patients were referred to the ICU in the postoperative period, however, none of them underwent surgery using the direct anterior approach. We had no cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PTE) or neurological injury, 19 (19.39%) patients had postoperative bleeding requiring dressing change, 4 (4.08%) needed blood transfusion, 2 (2.04%) patients had implant instability, 1 (1.02%) patient had a fracture during surgery and 1 (1.02%) patient died of cardiac complications. Conclusion FTP may be a viable alternative to reduce the length of stay and immediate postoperative complications for elective total hip arthroplasty surgery decreasing the length of stay of patients by 2 to 3 times when compared to the national average of 7.1 days.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar os resultados da implantação do Protocolo de Recuperação Rápida (PRR), prática médica baseada em evidências científicas, para cirurgia eletiva de artroplastia total do quadril principalmente comparando à Taxa Média de Internação Hospitalar nacional de 7.1 dias. Métodos 98 pacientes submetidos a cirurgia eletiva de artroplastia total do quadril pela via direta anterior, via anterolateral e via posterior foram incluídos no PRR no período de dezembro de 2018 a março de 2020 sendo acompanhados no pré-operatório, intraoperatório e pós-operatório imediato. Resultados a Taxa Média de Permanência Hospitalar foi de 2,8 dias, sendo 2,1 dias para a Via de Acesso Anterior, 3,0 dias para via de acesso anterolateral e 4,1 dias para via de acesso posterior. O tempo médio de cirurgia foi de 90 minutos, 19 (19,39%) dos pacientes foram encaminhados à UTI no pós-operatório, no entanto nenhum deles operado pela via direta anterior. Não tivemos casos de trombose venosa profunda (TVP), embolia pulmonar (TEP) ou lesão neurológica, 19 (19,39%) pacientes tiveram sangramento pós-operatório com necessidade de troca de curativo, 4 (4,08%) necessidade de transfusão sanguínea, 2 (2,04%) pacientes apresentaram instabilidade do implante, 1(1,02%) paciente teve fratura durante a cirurgia e 1(1,02%) paciente faleceu por complicações cardíacas. Conclusão O PRR pode ser uma alternativa viável para diminuir o tempo de internação e as complicações pós-operatórias imediatas para a cirurgia eletiva de artroplastia total do quadril diminuindo 2 a 3 vezes o tempo de internação dos pacientes quando comparado com a média nacional de 7,1 dias.

Implementação de melhorias na atenção primária à saúde: protocolo de enfermagem e gerenciamento de unidades / Implementation of improvements in primary health care: nursing protocol and unit management / Implementación de mejoras em la atención primaria de salud: protocolo de enfermería y gestión de la unidad

Objetivo: Descrever a experiência da elaboração do Protocolo de Enfermagem da Atenção Primária e o gerenciamento das Unidades Básicas de Saúde de Rio Branco ­ Acre. Métodos: Trata-se de um relato de experiência, sobre a elaboração de um Protocolo, instrumento potente para a implementação de melhorias e a gerência de Unidades Básicas de Saúde. A elaboração do protocolo foi realizada por etapas: Etapa 1: Composição da Comissão; Etapa 2: Pesquisa e Construção; Etapa 3: Consulta Pública; Etapa 4: Finalização da Construção. Resultados: Foi constituído uma comissão de elaboração do protocolo. Foi observado a implementação de melhorias na assistência prestada à população durante o período de execução do projeto. A frente do gerenciamento das Unidades Básicas de Saúde, foi possível vivenciar de perto o cenário da Atenção Primária à Saúde, (financiamentos, composição de equipes e atributos), conhecer a capacidade gerencial e política para organização da assistência à saúde, como também implementar melhorias relacionadas à gestão da clínica e diretrizes clínicas. Conclusão: A elaboração e implementação de um Protocolo de Enfermagem da Atenção Primária agrega não apenas conhecimento para a prática, vislumbra mais valorização profissional, onde possibilita o rompimento de uma barreira centrada na figura médica, ao atribuir à enfermagem papel relevante e conquistada, com protocolos de atendimento capazes de suprir as demandas existentes nas Unidades. Além de permitir o fortalecimento, visibilidade técnica, científica e a ampliação do acesso às pessoas à Atenção Primária à Saúde como parte significativa e resolutiva pela enfermagem. (AU)

Objective: To describe the experience of elaborating the Primary Care Nursing Protocol and the management of Basic Health Units in Rio Branco ­ Acre. Methods: This is an experience report on the elaboration of a Protocol, a powerful instrument for implementing improvements and managing Basic Health Units. The preparation of the protocol was carried out in stages: Stage 1: Composition of the Committee; Stage 2: Research and Construction; Stage 3: Public Consultation; Step 4: Completion of Construction. Results: A protocol drafting committee was set up. The implementation of improvements in the assistance provided to the population during the project execution period was observed. Ahead of the management of Basic Health Units, it was possible to experience the Primary Health Care scenario closely, (financing, composition of teams and attributes), to know the managerial and political capacity for the organization of health care, as well as to implement related improvements. clinic management and clinical guidelines. Conclusion: The elaboration and implementation of a Primary Care Nursing Protocol adds not only knowledge to practice, it envisions more professional appreciation, which makes it possible to break a barrier centered on the medical figure, by attributing a relevant and conquered role to nursing, with protocols services capable of meeting the existing demands in the Units. In addition to allowing the strengthening, technical and scientific visibility and the expansion of people's access to PHC as a significant and decisive part of nursing. (AU)

Objetivo: Describir la experiencia de elaboración del Protocolo de Enfermería de Atención Primaria y la gestión de Unidades Básicas de Salud en Rio Branco ­ Acre. Métodos: Este es un relato de experiencia sobre la elaboración de un Protocolo, un poderoso instrumento para implementar mejoras y gestionar Unidades Básicas de Salud. La elaboración del protocolo se realizó por etapas: Etapa 1: Composición del Comité; Etapa 2: Investigación y Construcción; Etapa 3: Consulta Pública; Paso 4: Finalización de la construcción. Resultados: Se constituyó una comisión de elaboración del protocolo. Se observó la implementación de mejoras en la asistencia prestada a la población durante el periodo de ejecución del proyecto. Frente a la gestión de las Unidades Básicas de Salud, fue posible vivir de cerca el cenário de la Atención Primaria de Salud (financiación, composición de equipos y atributos), conocer la capacidad gerencial y política para la organización de la asistencia a la salud, así como implementar mejoras relacionadas, con la gestión de la clínica y direcciones clínicas. Conclusión: La elaboración e implementación de un Protocolo de Enfermería de Atención Primaria aporta no sólo conocimiento a la práctica, sino que aporta mayor valorización profesional, al permitir el rompimiento de una barrera centrada en la figura médica, para atribuir a la enfermería un papel relevante y conquistado, con protocolos de atención capaces de superar las demandas existentes en las Unidades. Además de permitir el fortalecimiento, la visibilidad técnica y científica y la ampliación del acceso de las personas a la Atención Primaria de Salud como parte significativa y resolutiva por parte de la enfermería. (AU)

Multidisciplinary treatment program for improvement in pain and disability associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain / Programa de tratamento multidisciplinar para melhora da dor e incapacidade associada a dor crônica lombar inespecífica

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lumbar disorders, which contribute to significant workplace absenteeism and chronic disability, are associated with a considerable financial and social burden. Although a conservative approach provides satisfactory pain relief, biomechanical improvement and is associated with a low risk of adverse effects, there is lack of consensus in the literature regarding the best therapeutic strategy in such cases. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal study used secondary data from the institutional medical records of patients who completed a multidisciplinary program for the treatment of low back pain between 2019 and 2021. Data regarding pain levels and motor skills were obtained from patients who completed the care program at a private hospital in Bento Gonçalves, RS. The following step-wise treatment algorithm was used: evaluation by a specialist physician for the etiological diagnosis of pain, pharmacological management and dry needling, followed by standard rehabilitation intervention performed by the physiotherapy team and exercises by the physical education team. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to measure pain at the start and at the completion of the intervention, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to measure motor skills at the start and at 6 and 12 months following the multiprofessional intervention for rehabilitation. RESULTS: A reduction in pain and motor disability in patients who completed all stages of the treatment program was observed. Pain by the VAS presented the following scores: baseline 7 [5-8] and after treatment 2 [0-4]; and the scores of the ODI were: at baseline 0.34 [0.26 - 0.40], at 6 months 0.16 [0.08 - 0.26] and after treatment 0.12 [0.04 - 0.21]. CONCLUSION: The treatment program reduced the pain and disability associated with low back pain and can serve as the basis for further studies carried out to confirm the effectiveness of this intervention.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: As doenças lombares, que contribuem para um absenteísmo significativo no local de trabalho e para a incapacidade crônica, estão associadas a um encargo financeiro e social considerável. Embora a abordagem conservadora proporcione alívio satisfatório da dor, melhore a biomecânica e esteja associada a baixo risco de efeitos adversos, não há consenso na literatura sobre a melhor estratégia terapêutica nesses casos. MÉTODOS: Neste estudo longitudinal retrospectivo, foram utilizados dados secundários dos prontuários médicos institucionais de pacientes que completaram um programa multidisciplinar para tratamento de dor lombar entre 2019 e 2021. Dados sobre níveis de dor e habilidades motoras foram obtidos de pacientes que completaram o programa assistencial de um hospital privado de Bento Gonçalves, RS. Foi utilizado o seguinte tratamento passo a passo: avaliação por médico especialista para diagnóstico etiológico da dor, manejo farmacológico e agulhamento a seco, seguido de intervenção de reabilitação padrão realizada pela equipe de fisioterapia e exercícios pela equipe de educação física. A escala analógica visual (EAV) foi utilizada para medir a dor no início e após a conclusão da intervenção, e o Índice de Incapacidade de Oswestry (ODI) foi usado para medir as habilidades motoras no início e aos 6 e 12 meses após a intervenção multiprofissional para reabilitação. RESULTADOS: Observou-se redução na dor e na incapacidade motora em pacientes que completaram todas as etapas do programa de tratamento. A intensidade da dor medida pela EAV apresentou as seguintes pontuações: basal 7 [5-8] e após tratamento 2 [0-4]; enquanto o ODI apresentou as pontuações: basal 0,34 [0,26 - 0,40], até 6 meses 0,16 [0,08 - 0,26] e após o tratamento 0,12 [0,04 - 0,21]. CONCLUSÃO: O programa de tratamento reduziu a dor e a incapacidade associadas à dor lombar e pode servir de base para novos estudos realizados para confirmar a eficácia desta intervenção.

Adaptação transcultural do Voice-related Experiences of Nonbinary Individuals - VENI para o português brasileiro / Cross-cultural adaptation of the Voice-related Experiences of Nonbinary Individuals - VENI to Brazilian Portuguese

RESUMO Objetivo Traduzir e adaptar transculturalmente o Voice-related Experiences of Nonbinary Individuals - VENI para o português brasileiro. Método Os procedimentos de adaptação transcultural foram baseados na combinação das recomendações e diretrizes da World Health Organization (WHO) Guidelines on Translation com o COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Foram realizadas cinco etapas: a) tradução do instrumento para o Português Brasileiro (PB) por um tradutor especialista no construto e um não-especialista, nativos do PB e fluentes em inglês; b) elaboração da síntese das duas traduções por consenso; c) retrotradução por um tradutor especialista no construto e um não-especialista, nativos do inglês e fluentes em PB; d) análise de um comitê formado por cinco fonoaudiólogos especialistas em voz e elaboração da versão final; e) pré-teste com 21 pessoas da população-alvo, aplicado virtualmente. Resultados Na tradução houve discordância no título, instruções, chave de resposta e em 15 itens. Na retrotradução, houve discordância quanto à forma em 12 itens e ao conteúdo em 4 itens. A análise do comitê de especialistas indicou mudanças no título, instruções de resposta, uma opção da chave de resposta, e em oito itens, para atender aos critérios de equivalência. No pré-teste houve proporção significativamente maior de respostas habituais do instrumento quando comparadas com a opção não-aplicável, usada regularmente nas adaptações de instrumentos. Conclusão A adaptação transcultural para o português brasileiro do VENI foi bem sucedida e resultou na versão denominada "Experiências relacionadas a Voz de Pessoas Não Binárias - VENI-Br".

ABSTRACT Purpose This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the "Voice-related Experiences of Nonbinary Individuals" (VENI) to Brazilian Portuguese (BP). Methods Cross-cultural adaptation was performed based on the combined guidelines of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Translation Recommendations and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The process included five stages: a) Translation of the instrument into BP by a translator specialized in the construct and a non-specialist, both native BP speakers and fluent in English; b) Synthesis of the two translations by consensus; c) Back-translation by a translator specialized in the construct and a non-specialist, both native English speakers and fluent in BP; d) Analysis by a committee of five speech-language pathologists voice specialist and the creation of the final version; e) Pre-testing with 21 individuals from the target population, conducted virtually. Results During the translation stage, there were disagreements regarding the title, instructions, response key, and 15 items. In the back-translation stage, there were discrepancies in the format of 12 items and the content of four items. The expert committee's analysis led to changes in the title, instructions, one option in the response key, and eight items to meet the equivalence criteria. In the pre-test, a significantly higher proportion of usual responses to the instrument was observed when compared to the non-applicable option; this is frequently observed in instrument adaptations. Conclusion The cross-cultural adaptation of VENI into Brazilian Portuguese was successful, resulting in the "Experiências relacionadas à Voz de Pessoas Não Binárias - VENI-Br" version.

Dental care in patients with periodontal disease and hearing impairment: a scoping review / Atención odontológica en pacientes con enfermedad periodontal y deficiencia auditiva: scoping review

Introduction: Literature shows that individuals with disabilities, including hearing impairment, often suffer from untreated dental caries, poor oral hygiene, and compromised periodontal health, leading to adverse effects on oral health. Objetive: This study aims to analyze current evidence concerning dental care strategies for controlling, managing, and preventing biofilm accumulation in patients with hearing impairment. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in the databases Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO and PubMed between April and May 2022 to identify articles establishing a relationship between periodontal disease and hearing disability. Full-text articles published in English or Spanish between 2012 and 2022 were included. Results: Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. These included cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, clinical trials, case reports, and case-control studies. Most studies reported fair to poor oral health status among individuals. Nine different interventions or management approaches for treating periodontal disease in patients with hearing impairment were identified. Conclusions: The current global evidence on the association between periodontal disease and hearing impairment is very limited. Dentists may need to employ various strategies to address communication barriers, as outlined in this study.

Introducción: Según la literatura, las personas en situación de discapacidad presentan caries dentales no tratadas, higiene bucal y estado periodontal deficiente, lo cual puede resultar en efectos negativos para su salud bucal. Objetivo: Analizar la evidencia existente con relación a la atención odontológica enfocada en el control, manejo y prevención de acumulación de biofilm en pacientes con deficiencia auditiva. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda de artículos en las bases de datos y motor de búsqueda (Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO y PubMed) entre abril y mayo 2022, de acuerdo con la evidencia existente que relacione la enfermedad periodontal y la discapacidad auditiva en la atención odontológica. Se incluyeron artículos de texto completo en idioma inglés o español, con fecha de publicación entre 2012 a 2022. Resultado: Se seleccionó un total de 17 artículos para su análisis. Se encontró estudios transversales, estudios de cohorte, ensayos clínicos, reporte de caso y estudios de casos y controles. La salud oral fue catalogada en estado regular y deficiente en la mayoría de los estudios. Se encontró 9 tipos de intervenciones o manejos para el tratamiento de la enfermedad periodontal en pacientes con hipoacusia. Conclusión: La evidencia existente respecto a la enfermedad periodontal y la deficiencia auditiva es insuficiente a nivel global. Debido a lo anterior, el odontólogo puede abordar los obstáculos comunicativos de diferentes maneras de acuerdo a los métodos descritos en esta publicación.

[Regulatory requirements; What steps must be taken before starting a biomedical research study?] / Requerimientos normativos: ¿Qué pasos tengo que seguir antes de iniciar un estudio de investigación biomédica?

Studies of research with human beings, their biological specimens, or their personal data in the field of biomedicine have been subject to regulation since the middle of the last century. Initially a regulation based on recommendations such as the Nuremberg Code, the Belmont Report or the first versions of the Declaration of Helsinki. All of them documents in which the principles (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice) were conceptualized, and that all researchers had to follow in the development of their research. This first phase is known as a period of self-regulation, because it is considered that the researchers themselves could, by following these recommendations, carry out their investigations without further control. Subsequently, it went through a clearly regulatory period in which the premises of these recommendations were progressively incorporated into the legal system of the different countries, and with this, arose the external control of the investigation by the administrations and other bodies, such as the Research Ethics Committees. The purpose of this article is to serve as a guide to professionals whose main activity is care in the field of Primary Care and who, in turn, are interested in initiating research studies to respond to uncertainties in the context of their daily activity that may arise.

Validação do protocolo de terapia familiar aplicado à saúde mental (PTF-SM1) / Validation of the family therapy protocol applied to mental health (PTF-SM1) / Validación del protocolo de terapia familiar aplicado a la salud mental (PTF-SM1)

Objetivo: validar o conteúdo do PTF-SM1 por profissionais de saúde mental com experiência em terapia familiar. Método: estudo metodológico, descritivo e com abordagem quantitativa, que ocorreu de julho a agosto de 2019, com a participação de profissionais de saúde mental com experiência em terapia familiar. Verificou-se o grau de concordância entre os avaliadores pelo percentual de concordância (PC) e o Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC). Resultados: obteve-se PC igual a 100,00% e IVC igual a 1,0, na avaliação do conteúdo e aparência do instrumento (PTF-SM1 e seu manual), quanto à representatividade, viabilidade, gramática, clareza, coerência, atualização, legibilidade, redação compatível aos profissionais, ao tamanho dos títulos e tópicos adequados, e operatividade para utilização nos serviços de saúde. Conclusão: o conteúdo do PTF-SM1 demonstrou-se adequado, conforme apontamentos dos avaliadores, tendo na versão final características de um instrumento possível de ser usado na prática clínica pelos profissionais de saúde mental.

Objective: to validate the content of the PTF-SM1 by mental health professionals with experience in family therapy. Method: methodological, quantitative, descriptive study carried out from July to August 2019, with the participation of mental health professionals with experience in family therapy. The degree of agreement between the evaluators was determined using the percentage of agreement (PC) and the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: PC equal to 100.00% and CVI equal to 1.0 were obtained, in the evaluation of the content and appearance of the instrument (PTF-SM1 and its manual), regarding representativeness, feasibility, grammar, clarity, coherence, updating, readability, writing compatible with professionals, size of titles and appropriate topics, and operability for use in health services. Conclusion: the content of the PTF-SM1 proved to be adequate, according to the evaluators' scores, with the final version having characteristics of an instrument that can be used in clinical practice by mental health professionals.