Toric Monofocal Intraocular Lenses for the Correction of Astigmatism during Cataract Surgery: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

PURPOSE: To review the published literature evaluating the visual and refractive outcomes and rotational stability of eyes implanted with toric monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the correction of keratometric astigmatism during cataract surgery and to compare those outcomes with outcomes of eyes implanted with nontoric monofocal IOLs and other astigmatism management methods performed during cataract surgery. This assessment was restricted to the toric IOLs available in the United States. METHODS: A literature search of English-language publications in the PubMed database was last conducted in July 2022. The search identified 906 potentially relevant citations, and after review of the abstracts, 63 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one studies ultimately were determined to be relevant to the assessment criteria and were selected for inclusion. The panel methodologist assigned each a level of evidence rating; 12 studies were rated level I and 9 studies were rated level II. RESULTS: Eyes implanted with toric IOLs showed excellent postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), reduction of postoperative refractive astigmatism, and good rotational stability. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was better and postoperative cylinder was lower with toric IOLs, regardless of manufacturer, when compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Correcting pre-existing astigmatism with toric IOLs was more effective and predictable than using corneal relaxing incisions (CRIs), especially in the presence of higher magnitudes of astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: Toric monofocal IOLs are effective in neutralizing pre-existing corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery and result in better UCDVA and significant reductions in postoperative refractive astigmatism compared with nontoric monofocal IOLs. Toric IOLs result in better astigmatic correction than CRIs, particularly at high magnitudes of astigmatism. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Comparison of clinical outcome after implantation of two toric intraocular lenses with different haptic type: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of astigmatism correction, rotational stability, and related factors of two different haptic type toric intraocular lenses. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Cataract patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of > 1 D were randomly implanted with C-loop haptic toric IOL (AcrySof-toric IOL) (group A) or plate-haptic toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M IOL) (group B). The residual astigmatism, intraocular lens rotation, and visual quality were determined and compared between the two groups at 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-nine eyes were included in this study, including 40 eyes in the group A and 39 eyes in the group B. No significant difference in preoperative visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and ophthalmic biological parameters was found between the two groups. There was no significant difference in residual astigmatism between the two groups at 3 months after surgery (P > 0.05). The rotation degree in the group A was 3.85 ± 2.92°, the rotation degree in the group B was 2.33 ± 2.31°, and a significant difference in intraocular lens rotation was identified between the two groups (P < 0.05). Upon exploring the rotation-related factors of the two different haptic type toric intraocular lenses, the rotation after implanting C-loop haptic toric IOL was positively correlated with axial length (Pearson r = 0.522, P = 0.01) and corneal white-to-white distance (Pearson correlation analysis r = 0.356, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The two different haptic type toric intraocular lenses effectively corrected regular corneal astigmatism and provided a good rotational stability after surgery. But the stability of plate-haptic toric IOL was better than that of C-loop haptic toric IOL. The rotational stability of C-loop haptic toric IOL was often related to axial length and corneal white-to-white distance.

Rotational stability of monofocal and diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens with identical design and material: a propensity score based prospective comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the rotational stability of a monofocal and a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens(IOLs) with identical design and material. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent plate-haptic toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M and AT LISA 909 M) implantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Follow-up examinations were conducted at 1 h, 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. A linear mixed model of repeated measures was used to investigate the changes in IOL rotation over time. A 2-week timeframe was utilized to assess differences in IOL rotation between the two groups. RESULT: After PSM, a total of 126 eyes were selected from each group for further analysis. Postoperatively, the time course of IOL rotation change in the two groups remained consistent, with the greatest rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively. At the 2-week postoperative mark, the monofocal toric IOL exhibited a higher degree of rotation compared to the multifocal toric IOL (5.40 ± 7.77° vs. 3.53 ± 3.54°, P = 0.015). In lens thickness(LT) ≥ 4.5 mm and white-to-white distance(WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm subgroups, the monofocal toric IOL rotated greater than the multifocal toric IOL (P = 0.026 and P = 0.011, respectively). CONCLUSION: The diffractive multifocal toric IOL exhibits superior rotational stability compared to the monofocal toric IOL, especially in subgroups LT ≥ 4.5 mm and WTW ≥ 11.6 mm. Moreover, the time course of IOL rotation change is consistent for both, with the maximum rotation occurring between 1 h and 1 day postoperatively.

Three-year outcomes of a novel toric intraocular lens implantation for moderate-high myopic astigmatism in phakic eyes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the three-year visual, refractive outcomes and adverse events of the Eyecryl toric phakic IOL (pIOL) for moderate-to-high myopic astigmatism. METHODS: This retrospective study included eligible patients who underwent refractive surgery in one or both eyes with Eyecryl toric pIOL for myopic astigmatism. The efficacy, safety, predictability, rotational stability, vector analysis, and adverse events were evaluated in patients with spherical refraction from - 4.50 to -17.00 diopters (D) and cylindrical refraction from - 0.75 to -5.50 D. RESULTS: Fifty-two eyes of 28 patients were included in the study. The mean efficacy and safety index were 1.12 ± 0.35 and 1.38 ± 0.42, respectively. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was - 10.06 ± 2.69 D and - 0.64 ± 0.61 D preoperatively and postoperatively at 36 months, respectively. The mean manifest astigmatism was - 2.06 ± 1.16 D and - 0.44 ± 0.48 D preoperatively and 36 months postoperative, respectively. During the final examination, 70% of the eyes showed an increase in CDVA of one or more lines compared to their preoperative state. There was a cumulative endothelial cell loss of 3.1% at 36 months postoperatively. One eye developed visually significant anterior subcapsular opacity, whereas another eye experienced pIOL opacification. CONCLUSION: The Eyecryl toric pIOL demonstrated satisfactory visual acuity and refractive outcomes, as assessed by efficacy, safety and stability over a three-year period.

Comparison of Postoperative Axial Rotation of the Toric Intraocular Lens in Cataract Surgery Combined with Vitrectomy versus Cataract Surgery Alone.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the postoperative axial rotation of the toric intraocular lens (T-IOL) after cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy versus cataract surgery alone. METHODS: This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study enrolled patients who underwent cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy in one eye and cataract surgery alone in the contralateral eye. AcrySof Toric IOLs (Alcon Laboratories) were implanted in both eyes of the same patient. The axial rotation of the T-IOL was analyzed 3 months postoperatively using photographs obtained during and after surgery. In the combined group, T-IOL axial alignment was performed before vitrectomy. Preoperative corneal astigmatism and postoperative residual astigmatism were also compared in both groups. RESULTS: This study examined 36 eyes of 18 patients (74.7 ± 6.8 years). The axial rotation was 2.94 ± 1.70° in the cataract group versus 3.06 ± 2.34° in the combined group 3 months postoperatively, and the difference lacked significance (p = 0.98). In the combined group, the mean axial rotation during surgery was 2.17 ± 1.80°. Axial rotation within 5° was observed in 17 of 18 eyes (94.4%) in the cataract group and 16 of 18 eyes (88.9%) in the combined group, with no significant difference (p = 0.54). The comparison of postoperative residual astigmatism with preoperative corneal astigmatism revealed a significant improvement from 1.49 ± 0.40 D to 0.39 ± 0.47 D in the cataract group (p < 0.0001) and from 1.61 ± 0.40 D to 0.42 ± 0.43 D in the combined group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative axial rotation of the T-IOL in eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with vitrectomy was stable and comparable to that of eyes that underwent cataract surgery alone.

Evaluating keratometry and corneal astigmatism data from biometers and anterior segment tomographers and mapping to reconstructed corneal astigmatism.

BACKGROUND: To compare results from different corneal astigmatism measurement instruments; to reconstruct corneal astigmatism from the postimplantation spectacle refraction and toric intraocular lens (IOL) power; and to derive models for mapping measured corneal astigmatism to reconstructed corneal astigmatism. METHODS: Retrospective single centre study involving 150 eyes treated with a toric IOL (Alcon SN6AT, DFT or TFNT). Measurements included IOLMaster 700 keratometry (IOLMK) and total keratometry (IOLMTK), Pentacam keratometry (PK) and total corneal refractive power in 3 and 4 mm zones (PTCRP3 and PTCRP4), and Aladdin keratometry (AK). Regression-based models mapping the measured C0 and C45 components (Alpin's method) to reconstructed corneal astigmatism were derived. RESULTS: Mean C0 components were 0.50/0.59/0.51 dioptres (D) for IOLMK/PK/AK; 0.2/0.26/0.31 D for IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4; and 0.26 D for reconstructed corneal astigmatism. All corresponding C45 components ranged around 0. The prediction models had main diagonal elements lower than 1 with some crosstalk between C0 and C45 (nonzero off-diagonal elements). Root-mean-squared residuals were 0.44/0.45/0.48/0.51/0.50/0.47 D for IOLMK/IOLMTK/PK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4/AK. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the different modalities are not consistent. On average IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4 match reconstructed corneal astigmatism, whereas IOLMK/PK/AK show systematic C0 offsets of around 0.25 D. IOLMTK/PTCRP3/PTCRP4. Prediction models can reduce but not fully eliminate residual astigmatism after toric IOL implantation.

Premium intraocular lens adoption: Insights from a national health insurance analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study explores the utilization patterns of premium and nonpremium intraocular lenses (IOLs) under Taiwan's National Health Insurance, given the potential out-of-pocket expenses incurred by cataract surgery patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional, population-based analysis was performed on patients who underwent IOL implantation between 2016 and 2020. IOLs were categorized into nonpremium and premium, with the latter further divided based on function. Logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses were employed to identify factors influencing IOL implantation, with data stratified by medical institute type, ownership, and patient demographics. RESULTS: In total, 1,194,805 IOLs were implanted during the study period. The rate of premium IOL implantation was lower compared to non-premium IOL implantation. However, the adoption rate of premium IOLs increased more rapidly than that of non-premium IOLs. Specifically, the adoption rate for premium IOLs was 35.2% in 2016, rising to 42.6% in 2020. Patients receiving treatment in clinics were considerably more likely to use nonpremium IOLs than were those receiving treatment in medical centers (12.7% higher probability for clinics; P < 0.001). The implantation of higher-end premium IOLs was more prevalent in clinics than in other medical institutes. The prevalence of premium IOL implantation was higher in private hospitals than in public hospitals (odds ratio: 1.403; P < 0.001). Premium IOLs were more commonly implanted in younger patients with higher income levels and without relative contraindications. CONCLUSIONS: IOL selection is associated with both personal and institutional characteristics. These factors should be considered in public policy development aimed at regulating the IOL market within a universal health insurance framework.

Evaluation of visual outcomes with toric intraocular lens implantation using digital marker during cataract surgery.

Objectives: To assess the visual improvement and mean residual astigmatism in patients who underwent cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens. METHODS: The retrospective, observational study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised data from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020, related to adult patients who had regular astigmatism of at least 0.75D and underwent cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation using a digital marker. The patients were followed up on post-operative days 1, 7, 30, 90 and 180. Along with age, the degree of astigmatism was noted. The visual acuity was calculated pre- and post-operatively. The mean residual astigmatism was then noted for all patients post-operatively. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: The sample comprised 240 eyes of 177 patients; 99(55.9%) males and 78(44.1%) females. The mean age of the sample was 62.5±10.6 years. The mean unaided visual acuity improved post-operatively from 0.57±0.38 to 0.07±0.22 at 90 days. At the 30-day follow-up, mean residual astigmatism had reduced from 1.52±0.84 to 0.01±0.09 (p<0.001). The mean intraocular lens rotation from the intended axis was 0.73°±0.92° on day 30. CONCLUSIONS: Toric intraocular lens implantation using a digital marker could effectively reduce the post-operative cylinder, and improve the unaided visual acuity following cataract surgery.

Custom-Made Artificial Iris and Toric-Intraocular Lens Intrascleral Flange Fixation: A Case Report.

Different techniques for artificial iris implantation with or without an intraocular lens, depending on lens status, are described in the literature. We describe a surgical technique for a custom-made artificial iris and toric-intraocular lens intrascleral flange fixation. We modified the "Backpack" artificial iris implantation surgical technique to facilitate an accurate alignment of the toric-intraocular lens in a patient with aphakia, aniridia, and high asymmetric astigmatism secondary to blunt trauma. Two months after the surgery, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/30, corrected to 20/25 with a refraction of -2.00 in the diopter sphere with no residual astigmatism. The artificial iris implant and toric-intraocular lens were well-centered. The patient was satisfied with the visual and cosmetic outcomes. This procedure, however, is not complication-free as our patient developed uveitis and increased intraocular pressure during the postoperative period, which was treated successfully.

Determination of the toric axis by using internal astigmatism axis in non-dilated eyes.

PURPOSE: To determine the toric intraocular lens (IOL) axis by using internal astigmatism axis obtained from Optical Path Difference (OPD) Scan III (Nidek Co.) in non-dilate eyes. METHODS: The eyes of patients who underwent toric IOL implantation for astigmatic correction were investigated. Patients who have ocular surface disorder, keratoconus, posterior capsule opacification were excluded. The IOL axis measured in non-dilated eyes in mesopic conditions by OPD scan III device and the IOL axis measured by using classical slit lamp biomicroscopy method in dilated eyes were detected at postoperative 1st and 6th months. Results were compared with correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Totally, 26 eyes of 18 patients were included. The difference between biomicroscopic IOL axis and OPD internal astigmatism axis was 4.96 ± 4.41 degrees at the 1st month and 3.62 ± 3.5 degrees at the 6th month. There was a significant and high correlation between biomicroscopic IOL axis and OPD internal astigmatism axis at both 1st month (r = 0.992 p < 0.001) and 6th month (r = 0.995 p < 0.001). According to regression analysis, the results of two measurement methods were significantly compatible with each other at 1st month (R Sq = 0.984 p < 0.001) and 6th month (R Sq = 0.990 p < 0.001) and there was a close to ideal linear (R Sq = 1) relationship between two methods. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with toric IOL implantation, the IOL axis and IOL rotation according to target IOL axis can be detected easily and effectively in a short time by OPD scan internal astigmatism axis without the need to dilate the pupil.

Propensity-matched comparison of postoperative stability and visual outcomes of toric intraocular lens with or without a capsular tension ring and updated meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the contribution of capsular tension ring (CTR) to postoperative stability and visual outcomes of a plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was performed among patients underwent toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M) implantation with or without CTR at the Eye and ENT hospital between April 2020 and November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA) and residual astigmatism, as well as IOLs' rotation, tilt, and decentration, were analyzed. Grouped multiple linear regression analysis was used to model predictive factors of rotation in each group. Additionally, a meta-analysis of data from 4 publications (284 eyes) and current study was performed to evaluate the effect of CTR co-implantation on toric IOL rotation. RESULTS: After PSM, 126 eyes from each group were included for further analysis. Postoperatively, UDVA was 0.31 ± 0.38 logMAR and 0.27 ± 0.36 logMAR in the CTR and NCTR groups, respectively (P = 0.441), and residual astigmatism was 0.75 ± 0.52 D and 0.86 ± 0.65 D, respectively (P = 0.139). The rotation of toric IOL was significantly smaller in the CTR group than in the NCTR group (4.63 ± 6.27 vs. 10.93 ± 16.05 degrees, P < 0.001). The regression models of the two groups and the coefficients of LT were significantly different (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the meta-analysis confirmed that CTR co-implantation reduced toric IOL rotation (MD, - 1.59; 95% CI, - 3.10 to - 0.09; P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: CTR enhances rotational stability of toric IOL by reducing the impact of LT, and CTR co-implantation is recommended in patients with lens thickness (LT) ≥ 4.5 mm, white-to-white (WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm, or high preexisting astigmatism.

Comparison of visual outcomes in adult patients with different types of developmental cataracts after toric multifocal intraocular lenses implantation.

PURPOSE:  To analyze and compare the visual performance and patient satisfaction following the implantation of toric multifocal intraocular lenses (TMIOLs) in adult patients with different types of developmental cataracts (DC) accompanied by corneal astigmatism (CA). METHODS:  This is a prospective observational cohort study. Patients diagnosed with DC aged 18-30 years were divided into three groups according to the anatomic location of the lens opacity: cortical, nuclear, and posterior subcapsular (PSC) groups, and implanted with TMIOLs. Visual acuity (VA), postoperative refractive astigmatism (RA), intraocular lens (IOL) rotation, high-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF) curve, and Strehl ratio were compared. The functional vision and incidence of photic phenomena were surveyed using questionnaires. RESULTS:  Fifty-five eyes of 37 patients were enrolled and completed a 1-year follow-up. The mean CA was 2.06 ± 0.79 D preoperatively, and the mean RA was 0.29 ± 0.30 D 3-month postoperatively. The IOL rotation was 2.48° ± 1.89°, with no deviation > 10°. At 12 months, mean uncorrected distance VA improved from 0.93 ± 0.41 preoperatively to 0.08 ± 0.08 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), mean uncorrected near VA increased from 0.45 ± 0.30 preoperatively to 0.12 ± 0.11 logMAR, and mean uncorrected intermediate VA was 0.14 ± 0.08 logMAR. The cortical and nuclear groups displayed better improvements in uncorrected near and intermediate VA than that in the PSC group. Similar results were observed in the 3-month defocus curves, HOAs, MTF curve, halo incidence, and near vision satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with DC accompanied by CA, TMIOLs implantation achieved good postoperative visual outcomes and significantly reduced glasses dependency. Patients with cortical or nuclear lens opacity showed better whole-course VA and quality of vision, while patients with PSC opacity showed unsatisfactory near vision and suffered more photic phenomena.

Visual performance and rotational stability of a multifocal toric intraocular lens in myopic eyes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the visual performance and rotational stability of the multifocal toric intraocular lens in myopes. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients with an axial length of ≥24.5 mm and regular corneal astigmatism of >1 diopter who underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery and implantation of a multifocal toric intraocular lens (AT LISA toric 909M). The visual acuity, defocus curves, residual astigmatism, rotational stability, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF), spectacle dependence and patient satisfaction were evaluated 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Forty-three eyes from 30 patients were enrolled in this study. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance and near visual acuities (logMAR) were 0.09 ± 0.08 (standard deviation, SD) and 0.14 ± 0.08, respectively. The defocus curve analysis provided a bimodal curve showing two peaks of maximum vision at 0.0 D and at -3.0 D defocus level. The multifocal toric intraocular lens showed excellent rotational stability; the mean rotation was 4.02 ± 2.49 (SD) degrees at 3 months postoperatively. Refractive predictability was excellent with a mean spherical equivalent of 0.19 ± 0.37 (SD) diopters (D) and a mean refractive cylinder of -0.34 ± 0.39 (SD) D. CONCLUSIONS: The diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens, AT LISA toric 909M, provided effective distance and near visual acuities in myopic eyes. It was a predictable and effective device with good rotational stability for the correction of preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery. In this study, more than 80% of patients achieved spectacle independence.

Influence of decentration of plate-haptic toric intraocular lens on postoperative visual quality.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the influence of decentration of plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (IOLs) on visual quality. METHODS: This study enrolled 78 eyes of 78 patients. Patients in group A were implanted with toric IOLs, and patients in group B were implanted with monofocal IOLs. All patients were divided into group A1 and B1 (decentration below 0.3 mm) and group A2 and B2 (decentration above 0.3 mm). The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), modulation transfer function cutoff (MTF cutoff), objective scatter index (OSI), strehl ratio (SR), optical interference and patients' satisfaction were measured in different pupils at three months postoperatively. The associations between decentration and visual quality were analyzed by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in UDVA, BCVA, MTF cutoff, OSI, SR, optical interference and patients' satisfaction among subgroups. The differences in decentration between groups A and B were not statistically significant. In group A2, the total higher order aberrations (tHOAs) at pupil sizes of 3 mm (P = 0.046), 5 mm (P = 0.014), spherical aberrations at pupil sizes of 3 mm (P = 0.011), 4 mm (P = 0.014), 5 mm (P = 0.000), secondary astigmatism at pupil sizes of 3 mm (P = 0.002), 4 mm (P = 0.005) were higher than in group B2. Compared to group A1, group A2 had higher spherical aberrations at pupil sizes of 4 mm (P = 0.042), 5 mm (P = 0.001), 6 mm (P = 0.038), secondary astigmatism at pupil sizes of 3 mm (P = 0.013), 4 mm (P = 0.005), 6 mm (P = 0.013). Group B2 has higher coma and secondary astigmatism than group B1 at 6-mm pupil (P = 0.014, P = 0.045). Significant positive correlations were found between spherical aberrations and the decentration of group A1 and A2 at 6-mm pupils. CONCLUSION: The decentration above 0.3 mm negatively affected visual quality due to increased tHOAs, spherical aberrations, coma and secondary astigmatism aberrations, the influence become larger with increasing pupil diameter. And toric IOLs are more affected by decentration than monofocal IOLs.

Outcomes of two different treatment modalities in mild to moderate keratoconus.

PURPOSE: To describe visual and refractive outcomes of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) and toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) implantation in cases of mild and moderate keratoconus. METHODS: A prospective descriptive interventional case series. 40 eyes were allocated into two groups. First group (20 eyes) was treated with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) 1 month after ICRS implantation and the second group was treated using TICL after 1 year of CXL. RESULTS: Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in spherical equivalent, cylindrical refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Both ICRS and TICL are effective in treatment of mid and moderate keratoconus with more predictable visual results with TICL.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia-correcting and toric intraocular lenses - a narrative review.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It's advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There's a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.

Soft toric contact lens wear improves digital performance and vision-A randomised clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare objective and subjective digital near visual performance and comfort in low to moderate astigmatic participants fitted with toric versus spherical equivalent silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses. METHODS: This was a double-masked, randomised, crossover study. Participants aged 18 to 39 years with astigmatism of -0.75 to -1.50 D were recruited and fitted with toric and spherical contact lenses, in random order. Outcomes were measured at baseline and after 1 week of wear with each contact lens type after the follow-up visits. High- and low-contrast near logMAR visual acuity, automated visual acuity, zoom (%), contrast (%), reading distance (cm), critical print size (logMAR) and reading speed were assessed. Participants also completed the validated Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) and Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire 8 (CLDEQ-8) for each correction type. RESULTS: Twenty-three participants completed the study (74% female, average age 24.4 ± 4.2 years). When participants wore toric contact lenses, near high- and low-contrast visual acuity and automated visual acuity improved by 3-4 letters (all p < 0.03) and participants were able to read faster on an iPad (p = 0.02). Participants were also able to read with 8% less contrast on the iPad with toric lenses (p = 0.01). Participants reported better subjective vision on the overall NAVQ (p = 0.001) and better comfort on the CLDEQ-8 (p = 0.02) with toric lenses. Fewer participants reported difficulty with maintaining focus at near, reading small print, reading labels/instructions, reading the computer display/keyboard and reading post/mail with toric correction. CONCLUSIONS: Toric contact lenses improve comfort, subjective and objective visual performance with digital devices and other near tasks compared with the spherical equivalent correction in participants with low to moderate astigmatism.

Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy versus toric intraocular lens implantation on correction of astigmatism in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) combined with non-toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation versus Toric IOL (TIOL) implantation in correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. METHODS: Relevant literature was searched in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and SinoMed. Data from the included studies were extracted. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the correction performance of FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation and TIOL implantation using postoperative refractive astigmatism, correction index, and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) outcomes. Publication bias assessment and sensitivity analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Five comparative studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The TIOL group had smaller postoperative refractive astigmatism and a greater correction index compared to the FSAK group. The mean differences in postoperative refractive astigmatism and correction index between the two groups were - 0.19D (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.26, P < 0.01, I2 = 7%) and - 0.09 (95% CI = - 0.18 to 0.00, P = 0.04, I2 = 0%), respectively. We found no statistically significant difference in UDVA between the two groups (95% CI = - 0.01 to 0.11, P = 0.09, I2 = 70%). CONCLUSIONS: FSAK combined with non-toric IOL implantation was found to be less effective than TIOL implantation in correcting preoperative corneal astigmatism in cataract patients. The difference in the effectiveness of astigmatism correction between the two surgical methods seems to diminish, as the degree of preoperative corneal astigmatism decreases.

One-dioptre toric IOL versus spherical IOL in eyes with low preoperative corneal astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To investigate the advantages/disadvantages of a 1.0 D toric IOL vs spherical IOL after regular phacoemulsification in eyes with preoperative astigmatism ≤ 1 D. METHODS: Retrospective comparative series involving pseudophakic eyes with preoperative topographic astigmatism ≤ 1.0 D implanted either with monofocal 1.0 D Toric IOL (T-group), or with spherical IOL (S-group). The postoperative refractive astigmatism (PRA, i.e. surgically induced + corneal) was the main outcome; also considered in the analyses were the uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (VA). The data were referred to the last postoperative follow-up visit, 2 to 4 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 60 eyes were included: 30 in the T-group and 30 in the S-group, matched for patient's age, laterality, and axial length. Before surgery, the mean corneal astigmatism was 0.62 ± 0.39 D in the T-group and 0.54 ± 0.33 D in the S-group (p = 0.4). In the S-group, PRA was 0.73 ± 0.37 D, higher than the corresponding preoperative corneal astigmatism (p = 0.040). In the T-group, PRA was 0.58 ± 0.31 D; the variation was not statistically significant. Uncorrected VA was significantly better in the T-group vs the S-group (p = 0.007), and the best-corrected VA was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that in eyes with very low preoperative astigmatism, 1.0 D toric IOLs were able to limit the increase of the PRA instead of those observed with the spherical IOLs. This could support the better uncorrected VA recorded in the T-group.

Effect of two different preoperative calculation schemes on visual outcomes of patients after toric intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To compare the postoperative visual outcomes of two different preoperative corneal incision schemes in TECNIS toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism greater than 1.0 diopter (D) were included. These patients were grouped according to the different preoperative schemes: steep-axis group and minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group. The outcome measurements were the residual refractive astigmatism, visual acuity, changes of corneal astigmatism, and high-order aberration at 1 month postoperatively. RESULTS: This study consisted of 90 eyes (45 eyes steep-axis group, 45 eyes minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group). 1 month after surgery, the refractive astigmatism was statistically lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (0.58 ± 0.40D vs 0.38 ± 0.37D, P = 0.021). The minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group had a smaller difference vector (0.56 ± 0.38D vs 0.36 ± 0.35D; P = 0.047) and a smaller prediction error (0.60 ± 0.44D vs 0.37 ± 0.35D; P = 0.004). In the steep-axis group, corneal astigmatism significantly decreased compared with preoperative value (1.65 ± 0.57D vs 1.17 ± 0.64D; P < 0.001). In the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group, the changes of corneal astigmatism before and after surgery were not significant. Moreover, total aberration and second astigmatism in ocular aberration were lower in the minimum-residual refractive astigmatism group compared with the steep-axis group (1.86 ± 1.09 vs 1.37 ± 0.95; P = 0.035 and 0.47 ± 0.28 vs 0.31 ± 0.19; P = 0.015, respectively). CONCLUSION: Minimum-residual refractive astigmatism incision had better astigmatism correction and more accurate prediction. The corneal astigmatism was stable 1 month after surgery. It might lead to better visual quality in the early postoperative stage. Trial registration number for prospectively registered trials: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04006912, 07/02/2019.