Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 551
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gac Med Mex ; 157(1): 97-101, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34125809

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19-associated mortality in patients who require mechanical ventilation is unknown in the Mexican population. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of Mexican patients with COVID-19 who required mechanical ventilation. METHODS: Observational cohort study carried out in an intensive care unit from March 25 to July 17, 2020. Data were obtained from a prospective database and electronic medical records, and were analyzed with the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney's U-test. RESULTS: One hundred patients required mechanical ventilation; median age was 56 years, 31 % were females and 97 % were Latin American. Most common comorbidities were obesity (36 %), diabetes (26 %), hypertension (20 %), and chronic or end-stage kidney disease (10 %). At the end of the analysis, 11 patients remained in the ICU, 31 had been discharged alive and 58 (65.2 %) died; survivors were younger, had lower scores on severity and organ dysfunction scales, lower levels of C-reactive protein at ICU admission, were less likely to receive hemodialysis and vasopressors, and had longer hospital and ICU stays. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds information on the presentation and results of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients who require mechanical ventilation.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La mortalidad por COVID-19 en quienes requieren ventilación mecánica se desconoce en la población mexicana. OBJETIVO: Describir las características de pacientes mexicanos con COVID-19 que requirieron ventilación mecánica. MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte observacional en una unidad de terapia intensiva, del 25 de marzo al 17 de julio de 2020. Los datos se obtuvieron de una base de datos prospectiva y de registros clínicos electrónicos; fueron analizados con c2, prueba exacta de Fisher o prueba U de Mann-Whitney. RESULTADOS: Cien pacientes recibieron ventilación mecánica, la edad media fue de 56 años, 31 % era del sexo femenino y 97 %, latinoamericano. Las comorbilidades más comunes fueron obesidad (36 %), diabetes (26 %), hipertensión (20 %) y enfermedad renal crónica o renal terminal (10 %). Al término del análisis, 11 pacientes permanecían en la UCI, 31 egresaron vivos y 58 (65.2 %) fallecieron; los sobrevivientes fueron más jóvenes, con menores puntuación en las escalas de gravedad y disfunción orgánica, menores niveles de proteína C reactiva al ingreso a la UCI, menor propensión a hemodiálisis, necesidad de, necesidad de vasopresores y con mayor estancia hospitalaria y en la UCI. CONCLUSIONES: Este estudio agrega información sobre la presentación y resultados de pacientes con ventilación mecánica infectados con SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , México/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Gac Med Mex ; 156(4): 306-310, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32831320

RESUMEN

COVID-19, the causative agent of which is a new type of coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, has caused the most severe pandemic in the last 100 years. The condition is mainly respiratory, and up to 5% of patients develop critical illness, a situation that has put enormous pressure on the health systems of affected countries. A high demand for care has mainly been observed in intensive care units and critical care resources, which is why the need to redistribute resources in critical medicine emerged, with an emphasis on distributive justice, which establishes the provision of care to the largest number of people and saving the largest number of lives. One principle lies in allocating resources to patients with higher life expectancy. Mechanical ventilator has been assumed to be an indivisible asset; however, simultaneous mechanical ventilation to more than one patient with COVID-19 is technically possible. Ventilator sharing is not without risks, but the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence and justice prevail. According to distributive justice, being a divisible resource, mechanical ventilator can be shared; however, we should ask ourselves if this action is ethically correct.


COVID-19, cuyo agente causal es un nuevo tipo de coronavirus denominado SARS-CoV-2, ha provocado la pandemia más grave en los últimos 100 años. La afección es principalmente respiratoria y hasta 5 % de los pacientes desarrolla enfermedad crítica, lo cual ha producido una enorme presión sobre los sistemas de salud de los países afectados. Principalmente se ha observado alta demanda de atención en las unidades de cuidados intensivos y de recursos de atención vital. De ahí la necesidad de redistribuir los recursos en medicina crítica, con énfasis en la justicia distributiva, la cual establece atender al mayor número de personas y salvar el mayor número de vidas. Un principio estriba en asignar los recursos a pacientes con mayores expectativas de vida. Se ha dado por hecho que el ventilador mecánico es un bien indivisible; sin embargo, técnicamente es posible la ventilación mecánica simultánea a más de un paciente con COVID-19. La acción de compartir el ventilador no está exenta de riesgos, pero prevalecen los principios de beneficencia, no maleficencia y justicia. Conforme la justicia distributiva, al ser un bien divisible, el ventilador mecánico puede ser compartido, sin embargo, cabe preguntarse si esta acción es éticamente correcta.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Gac Med Mex ; 156(6): 539-545, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33877109

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Even with an adequate mechanical ventilation weaning (MVW) protocol, the procedure fails in 15 to 30 % of cases. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between independent risk factors (IRFs) and post-extubation failure in patients undergoing MVW in an intensive care unit. METHOD: Longitudinal, prospective, analytical cohort study in patients on mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours and who were extubated. Pre-extubation reports of hemoglobin, albumin, phosphorus, waist-hip ratio and SOFA score were obtained. Extubation failure was defined as resumption of mechanical ventilation within 48 hours or less. RESULTS: 123 patients were extubated, out of whom 74 were males (60 %); average age was 50 ± 18 years. Extubation failure occurred in 37 (30 %). Hypoalbuminemia was associated as an independent risk factor in 29 (23.8 %, RR = 1.43, 95 % CI = 1.11-1.85) and hypophosphatemia was in 18 (14.6 %, RR = 2.98, 95 % CI = 1.66-5.35); two or more IRFs were observed in 22.7 % (RR = 1.51, 95 % CI = 1.14-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: Identifying independent risk factors prior to MVW can help reduce the risk of extubation failure and associated morbidity and mortality. INTRODUCCIÓN: Aun con adecuado protocolo de desconexión de la ventilación mecánica (DVM), el procedimiento falla en 15 a 30 % de los casos. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la asociación entre factores de riesgo independientes y fracaso posextubación en pacientes con DVM en una unidad de cuidados intensivos. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte, longitudinal, prospectivo, analítico, que incluyó pacientes sometidos a ventilación mecánica por más de 24 horas y que fueron extubados. Se obtuvieron reportes preextubación de hemoglobina, albúmina, fósforo, índice cintura-cadera y puntuación SOFA. Se definió como fracaso de extubación al reinicio de la ventilación mecánica en 48 horas o menos. RESULTADOS: Se extubaron 123 pacientes, 74 hombres (60 %); la edad promedio fue de 50 ± 18 años. Ocurrió fracaso de extubación en 37 (30 %). Como factores de riesgo independentes se asoció hipoalbuminemia en 29 (23.8 %, RR = 1.43, IC 95 % = 1.11-1.85) e hipofosfatemia en 18 (14.6 %, RR = 2.98, IC 95 % = 1.66-5.35); se observaron dos o más factores de riesgo independientes en 22.7 % (RR = 1.51, IC 95 % = 1.14-2.00). CONCLUSIONES: Identificar los factores de riesgo independentes antes de la DVM puede ayudar a reducir el fracaso de la extubación y la morbimortalidad asociada.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal/efectos adversos , Desconexión del Ventilador , Extubación Traqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemoglobina A/análisis , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fósforo/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Retratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Factores de Tiempo , Relación Cintura-Cadera
4.
Gac Med Mex ; 156(3): 249-252, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32539019

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous mechanical ventilation of several patients with a single ventilator might reduce the deficit of these devices for the care of patients with acute respiratory failure due to Covid-19. OBJECTIVE: To communicate the results of a mechanical ventilation exercise with a ventilator in a lung simulator, and simultaneously in two and four. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between programmed, recorded and measured positive end-expiratory pressure, mean airway pressure and peak pressure, except when simultaneously ventilating four lung simulators. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous mechanical ventilation should be implemented by medical personnel with experience in the procedure, be restricted to two patients and carried out in the intensive care unit.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La ventilación mecánica simultánea a varios pacientes con un solo ventilador podría disminuir el déficit de esos dispositivos para atender a los enfermos con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda por Covid-19. OBJETIVO: Comunicar los resultados de un ejercicio de ventilación mecánica con un ventilador en un simulador de pulmón, y simultáneamente en dos y cuatro. RESULTADOS: No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre la presión positiva al final de la espiración, presión media de la vía aérea y presión pico programadas, registradas y medidas, excepto al ventilar simultáneamente cuatro simuladores de pulmón. CONCLUSIONES: La ventilación mecánica simultánea debe ser instaurada por personal médico con experiencia en el procedimiento, restringirse a dos pacientes y ser realizada en la unidad de cuidados intensivos.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Ventiladores Mecánicos/provisión & distribución , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Respiración Artificial/instrumentación , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología
5.
Gac Med Mex ; 154(2): 236-253, 2018.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29733073

RESUMEN

In 1967, Ashbaugh et al. published in the Lancet the description of a new entity, for which they coined the name "adult respiratory distress syndrome". On that article, they thoroughly described 12 patients who had respiratory distress with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and oxygen therapy-refractory hypoxemia. For its management, emphasis was made on the importance of intubation and mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure. At 50 years of its first publication, great advances on the knowledge of this condition have been achieved, which has influenced on patient management and survival. To celebrate this 50th anniversary, the National Academy of Medicine of Mexico organized a symposium with the purpose to spread the knowledge about this condition, recognize the researchers who made the original description and those who over the course of 50 years of history have contributed to its better understanding. The symposium addressed the topics of lung-kidney interaction, molecular bases of the disease and therapeutic advances.


En 1967, Ashbaugh et al. publicaron en Lancet la descripción de una nueva entidad para la que acuñaron el nombre "síndrome de distress respiratorio del adulto". En ese artículo describieron minuciosamente a 12 enfermos que presentaban insuficiencia respiratoria, con infiltración pulmonar bilateral e hipoxemia resistente a oxigenoterapia. Para su manejo se hizo énfasis en la importancia de la intubación y la ventilación mecánica con presión positiva al final de la espiración. A 50 años de la publicación se han logrado grandes avances en el conocimiento de esta enfermedad, lo que ha influido en el manejo y supervivencia de los pacientes. Para celebrar este cincuentenario, la Academia Nacional de Medicina de México organizó un simposio que tuvo como objetivos difundir el conocimiento de esta enfermedad, reconocer a los personajes que hicieron la descripción original y a quienes en 50 años de historia han contribuido a su mejor entendimiento. El simposio abordó los temas de interacción pulmón-riñón, bases moleculares de la enfermedad y avances en el tratamiento.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Riñón/fisiopatología , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia
6.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(3): 153-164, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27743679

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for the microbiological diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are imprecise. Based on data provided by intensive care specialists (ICS) and microbiologists, this study defines the clinical practices and microbiological techniques currently used for an aetiological diagnosis of VAP and pinpoints deficiencies. METHODS: Eighty hospitals in the national health network with intensive care and microbiology departments were sent two questionnaires, one for each department, in order to collect data on VAP diagnosis for the previous year. RESULTS: Out of the 80 hospitals, 35 (43.8%) hospitals participated. These included 673 ICU beds, 32,020 ICU admissions, 173,820 ICU days stay, and generated 27,048 lower respiratory tract specimens in the year. A third of the hospitals (35%) had a microbiology department available 24/7. Most samples (83%) were tracheal aspirates. Gram stain results were immediately reported in around half (47%) of the hospitals. Quantification was made in 75% of hospitals. Molecular techniques and direct susceptibility testing were performed in 12% and one institution, respectively. Mean turnaround time for a microbiological report was 1.7 (SD; 0.7), and 2.2 (SD; 0.6) days for a negative and positive result, respectively. Telephone/in-person information was offered by 65% of the hospitals. Most (89%) ICS considered microbiological information as very useful. No written procedures were available in half the ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: Both ICS and microbiologists agreed that present guidelines for the diagnosis of VAP could be much improved, and that a new set of consensus guidelines is urgently required. A need for guidelines to be more effectively implemented was also identified in order to improve outcomes in patients with VAP.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/diagnóstico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Actitud , Bacteriología , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitales , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Autoinforme , España
7.
Enferm Intensiva ; 28(4): 178-186, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28890209

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether adherence to non-pharmacological measures in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is associated with nursing workload. METHODS: A prospective observational study performed in a single medical-surgical ICU. Nurses in charge of patients under ventilator support were assessed. VARIABLES: knowledge questionnaire, application of non-pharmacological VAP prevention measures, and workload (Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score). Phases: 1) the nurses carried out a educational programme, consisting of 60-minute lectures on non-pharmacological measures for VAP prevention, and at the end completed a questionnaire knowledge; 2) observation period; 3) knowledge questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 67 ICU-staff nurses, 54 completed the educational programme and were observed. A total of 160 observations of 49 nurses were made. Adequate knowledge was confirmed in both the initial and final questionnaires. Application of preventive measures ranged from 11% for hand washing pre-aspiration to 97% for the use of a sterile aspiration probe. The Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score was 50±13. No significant differences were observed between the association of the nurses' knowledge and the application of preventive measures or between workload and the application of preventive measures. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses' knowledge of VAP prevention measures is not necessarily applied in daily practice. Failure to follow these measures is not subject to lack of knowledge or to increased workload, but presumably to contextual factors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Críticos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/prevención & control , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
Enferm Intensiva ; 28(4): 169-177, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28602751

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The semirecumbent position is a widespread recommendation for the prevention of pneumonia associated with mechanical ventilation. AIMS: To identify the time of elevation of head of bed for patients under mechanical ventilation and the factors related to such elevation in an intensive care unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive cross-sectional study. Conducted in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital from April to June 2015. The studied population were mechanically ventilated patients. Daily hours in which patients remained with the head of the bed elevated (≥30°), socio-demographic data and clinical variables were recorded. RESULTS: 261 head elevation measurements were collected. The average daily hours that patients remained at ≥30° was 16h28' (SD ±5h38'), equivalent to 68.6% (SD ±23.5%) of the day. Factors related to elevations ≥30° for longer were: enteral nutrition, levels of deep sedation, cardiac and neurocritical diagnostics. Factors that hindered the position were: sedation levels for agitation and abdominal pathologies. Sex, age and ventilation mode did not show a significant relationship with bed head elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Although raising the head of the bed is an easy to perform, economical and measurable preventive measure, its compliance is low due to specific factors specific related o the patient's clinical condition. Using innovations such as continuous measurement of the head position helps to evaluate clinical practice and allows to carry out improvement actions whose impact is beneficial to the patient.


Asunto(s)
Lechos , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo
9.
Med Intensiva ; 41(6): 330-338, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28292527

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of enteral nutrition volume, gastrointestinal function and the type of acid suppressive drug upon the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation (MV). DESIGN: A retrospective secondary analysis was carried out. SETTING: The Intensive Care Unit of a University Hospital. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Patients≥18-years-old expected to need MV for more than four days, and receiving enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube within 24h of starting MV. INTERVENTIONS: We correlated enteral nutrition volume administered during the first 10 days, gastrointestinal function and the type of acid suppressive therapy with the episodes of lower respiratory tract infection up until day 28. Cox proportional hazards ratios in univariate and adjusted multivariate models were used. Statistical significance was considered for p<0.05. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Lower respiratory tract infection episodes. RESULTS: Sixty-six out of 185 patients (35.7%) had infection; 27 patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia; and 39 presented ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis. Uninfected and infected groups were similar in terms of enteral nutrition volume (54±12 and 54±9mL/h; p=0.94) and caloric intake (19.4±4.9 and 19.6±5.2kcal/kg/d; p=0.81). The Cox proportional hazards model showed neurological indication of MV to be the only independent variable related to infection (p=0.001). Enteral nutrition volume, the type of acid suppressive therapy, and the use of prokinetic agents were not significantly correlated to infection. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutrition volume and caloric intake, gastrointestinal dysfunction and the type of acid suppressive therapy used were not associated to lower respiratory tract infection in patients on MV.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica , Ingestión de Energía , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Femenino , Tracto Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Med Intensiva ; 41(9): 550-558, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28238441

RESUMEN

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is still related to high mortality and morbidity rates. Most patients with ARDS will require ventilatory support. This treatment has a direct impact upon patient outcome and is associated to major side effects. In this regard, ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI) is the main concern when this technique is used. The ultimate mechanisms of VALI and its management are under constant evolution. The present review describes the classical mechanisms of VALI and how they have evolved with recent findings from physiopathological and clinical studies, with the aim of analyzing the clinical implications derived from them. Lastly, a series of knowledge-based recommendations are proposed that can be helpful for the ventilator assisted management of ARDS at the patient bedside.


Asunto(s)
Respiración Artificial/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/prevención & control , Impedancia Eléctrica , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Posición Prona , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/diagnóstico por imagen , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/etiología , Trabajo Respiratorio
11.
Med Intensiva ; 41(5): 306-315, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28161027

RESUMEN

The aim of treatment in acute traumatic spinal cord injury is to preserve residual neurologic function, avoid secondary injury, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this second part of the review, we describe the management of spinal cord injury focusing on issues related to short-term respiratory management, where the preservation of diaphragmatic function is a priority, with prediction of the duration of mechanical ventilation and the need for tracheostomy. Surgical assessment of spinal injuries based on updated criteria is discussed, taking into account that although the type of intervention depends on the surgical team, nowadays treatment should afford early spinal decompression and stabilization. Within a comprehensive strategy in spinal cord injury, it is essential to identify and properly treat patient anxiety and pain associated to spinal cord injury, as well as to prevent and ensure the early diagnosis of complications secondary to spinal cord injury (thromboembolic disease, gastrointestinal and urinary disorders, pressure ulcers).


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Enfermedad Aguda , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Diafragma/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/etiología , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/terapia , Humanos , Apoyo Nutricional , Manejo del Dolor , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Trastornos Respiratorios/etiología , Trastornos Respiratorios/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Mecánica Respiratoria , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/prevención & control , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Trombofilia/etiología , Trombofilia/terapia , Traqueostomía , Trastornos Urinarios/etiología , Trastornos Urinarios/terapia
12.
Med Intensiva ; 41(8): 491-496, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188062

RESUMEN

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a crucial element in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), because there is high level evidence that a low tidal volume of 6ml/kg (protective ventilation) improves survival. In these patients with refractory respiratory insufficiency, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used. This salvage technique improves oxygenation, promotes CO2 clearance, and facilitates protective and ultraprotective MV, potentially minimizing ventilation-induced lung injury. Although numerous trials have investigated different ventilation strategies in patients with ARDS, consensus is lacking on the optimal MV settings during venovenous ECMO. Although the concept of "lung rest" was introduced years ago, there are no evidence-based guidelines on its use in application to MV in patients supported by ECMO. How MV in ECMO patients can promote lung recovery and weaning from ventilation is not clear. The purpose of this review is to describe the ventilation strategies used during venovenous ECMO in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Dióxido de Carbono/sangre , Sistemas de Computación , Impedancia Eléctrica , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/etiología , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/prevención & control
13.
Med Intensiva ; 41(9): 559-568, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28318674

RESUMEN

Despite major advances in our understanding of the physiopathology of brain death (BD), there are important controversies as to which protocol is the most appropriate for organ donor management. Many recent reviews on this subject offer recommendations that are sometimes contradictory and in some cases are not applied to other critically ill patients. This article offers a review of the publications (many of them recent) with an impact upon these controversial measures and which can help to confirm, refute or open new areas of research into the most appropriate measures for the management of organ donors in BD, and which should contribute to discard certain established recommendations based on preconceived ideas, that lead to actions lacking a physiopathological basis. Aspects such as catecholamine storm management, use of vasoactive drugs, hemodynamic objectives and monitoring, assessment of the heart for donation, and general care of the donor in BD are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Muerte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Catecolaminas/metabolismo , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Nutrición Enteral , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Cuidado Terminal/normas , Hormonas Tiroideas/uso terapéutico , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/normas , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
14.
Med Intensiva ; 41(8): 461-467, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28283325

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of changes in FiO2 on the bias and accuracy of the determination of oxygen consumption (V˙O2) and carbon dioxide production (V˙CO2) using the E-COVX monitor in patients with mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Descriptive of concordance. SETTING: Intensive Care Unit. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Patients with mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: We measured V˙O2 and V˙CO2 using the E-COVX monitor. Values recorded were the average in 5min. Two groups of 30 patients. We analyzed: 1) the reproducibility in the measurement of V˙O2 and V˙CO2 at FiO2 0.4, and 2) the effect of the changes in FiO2 on the measurement of V˙O2 and V˙CO2. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland and Altman test. VARIABLES OF MAIN INTEREST: Bias and accuracy. RESULTS: 1) FiO2 0.4 reproducibility: The bias in the measurement of V˙O2 and V˙CO2 was 1.6 and 2.1mL/min, respectively, and accuracy was 9.7 to -8.3% and 7.2 to -5.2%, respectively, and 2) effect of FiO2 on V˙O2: The bias of V˙O2 measured at FiO2 0.4 and 0.6 was -4.0mL/min and FiO2 0.4 and 0.8 was 5.2mL/min. Accuracy between FiO2 0.4 and 0.6 was 11.9 to -14.1%, and between FiO2 0.4 and 0.8 was 43.9 to -39.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The E-COVX monitor evaluates V˙O2 and V˙CO2 in critical patients with mechanical ventilation with a clinically acceptable accuracy until FiO2 0.6.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias/instrumentación , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Monitoreo Fisiológico/instrumentación , Consumo de Oxígeno , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Calorimetría Indirecta , Cuidados Críticos , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/farmacología , Mediciones del Volumen Pulmonar/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxígeno/análisis , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Respiración Artificial
15.
Med Intensiva ; 41(5): 277-284, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27776936

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of setting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in an individualized manner (based on highest static compliance) compared to setting PEEP according to FiO2 upon mortality at 28 and 90 days, in patients with different severity acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). SETTING: A Spanish medical-surgical ICU. DESIGN: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled pilot study. PATIENTS: Patients with ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: Ventilation with low tidal volumes and pressure limitation at 30cmH2O, randomized in two groups according to the method used to set PEEP: FiO2-guided PEEP group according to FiO2 applied and compliance-guided group according to the highest compliance. PRIMARY VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Demographic data, risk factors and severity of ARDS, APACHE II and SOFA scores, daily Lung Injury Score, ventilatory measurements, ICU and hospital stay, organ failure and mortality at day 28 and 90 after inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients with ARDS were evaluated, but just 70 patients were included. Severe ARDS patients showed more organ dysfunction-free days at 28 days (12.83±10.70 versus 3.09±7.23; p=0.04) and at 90 days (6.73±22.31 vs. 54.17±42.14, p=0.03), and a trend toward lower 90-days mortality (33.3% vs. 90.9%, p=0.02), when PEEP was applied according to the best static compliance. Patients with moderate ARDS did not show these effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe ARDS, individualized PEEP selection based on the best static compliance was associated to lower mortality at 90 days, with an increase in organ dysfunction-free days at 28 and 90 days.


Asunto(s)
Rendimiento Pulmonar , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , APACHE , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Oxígeno/análisis , Proyectos Piloto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/etiología , Lesión Pulmonar Inducida por Ventilación Mecánica/prevención & control
16.
Enferm Intensiva ; 27(4): 155-167, 2016.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26803376

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Safe analgesia and sedation strategies are necessary in order to avoid under or over sedation, as well as improving the comfort and safety of critical care patients. OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast a multidisciplinary protocol of systematic evaluation and management of analgesia and sedation in a group of critical care patients on mechanical ventilation with the usual procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study with contemporary series was conducted in a tertiary care medical-surgical ICU February to November during 2013 and 2014. The inclusion criteria were mechanical ventilation ≥ 24h and use of sedation by continuous infusion. Sedation was monitored using the Richmond agitation-sedation scale or bispectral index, and analgesia were measured using the numeric rating scale, or behavioural indicators of pain scale. The study variables included; mechanical ventilation time, weaning time, ventilation support time, artificial airway time, continuous sedative infusion time, daily dose and frequency of analgesic and sedative drug use, hospital stay, and ICU and hospital mortality, Richmond agitation-sedation scale, bispectral index, numeric rating scale, and behavioural indicators of pain scale measurements. Kruskal Wallis and Chi2, and a significance of p<.05 were used. RESULTS: The study included 153 admissions, 75 pre-intervention and 78 post-intervention, with a mean age of 55.7±13 years old, and 67% men. Both groups showed similarities in age, reason for admission, and APACHE. There were non-significant decreases in mechanical ventilation time 4 (1.4-9.2) and 3.2 (1.4-8.1) days, respectively; p= 0.7, continuous sedative infusion time 6 (3-11) and 5 (3-11) days; p= 0.9, length of hospital stay 29 (18-52); 25 (14-41) days; p= 0.1, ICU mortality (8 vs. 5%; p= 0.4), and hospital mortality (10.6 vs. 9.4%: p= 0.8). Daily doses of midazolam and remifentanil decreased 347 (227-479) mg/day; 261 (159-358) mg/day; p= 0.02 and 2175 (1427-3285) mcg/day; 1500 (715-2740) mcg/day; p= 0.02, respectively. There were increases in the use of remifentanil (32% vs. 51%; p= 0.01), dexmedetomidine (0 vs.6%; p= 0.02), dexketoprofen (60 vs. 76%; p= 0.03), and haloperidol (15 vs.28%; p= 0.04). The use of morphine decreased (71 vs. 54%; p= 0.03). There was an increase in the number of measurements and Richmond agitation-sedation scale scores 6 (3-17); 21 (9-39); p< 0.0001, behavioural indicators of pain scale 6 (3-18); 19(8-33); p< 0.001 and numeric rating scale 4 (2-6); 8 (6-17); p< 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a multidisciplinary protocol of systematic evaluation of analgesia and sedation management achieved an improvement in monitoring and adequacy of dose to patient needs, leading to improved outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Sedación Consciente , Sedación Profunda , Respiración Artificial , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Med Intensiva ; 40(8): 463-473, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27590592

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of the behavioral indicators of pain scale (ESCID) when applied to a wide range of medical and surgical critical patients. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective observational study was designed to validate a scale measuring instrument. SETTING: Twenty Intensive Care Units of 14 hospitals belonging to the Spanish National Health System. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 286 mechanically ventilated, unable to self-report critically ill medical and surgical adult patients. PROCEDURE: Pain levels were measured by two independent evaluators simultaneously, using two scales: ESCID and the behavioral pain scale (BPS). Pain was observed before, during, and after two painful procedures (turning, tracheal suctioning) and one non-painful procedure. MAIN VARIABLES: ESCID reliability was measured on the basis of internal consistency using the Cronbach-α coefficient. Inter-rater and intra-rater agreement were measured. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between ESCID and BPS. RESULTS: A total of 4386 observations were made in 286 patients (62% medical and 38% surgical). High correlation was found between ESCID and BPS (r=0.94-0.99; p<0.001), together with high intra-rater and inter-rater concordance. ESCID was internally reliable, with a Cronbach-α value of 0.85 (95%CI 0.81-0.88). Cronbach-α coefficients for ESCID domains were high: facial expression 0.87 (95%CI 0.84-0.89), calmness 0.84 (95%CI 0.81-0.87), muscle tone 0.80 (95%CI 0.75-0.84), compliance with mechanical ventilation 0.70 (95%CI 0.63-0.75) and consolability 0.85 (95%CI 0.81-0.88). CONCLUSION: ESCID is valid and reliable for measuring pain in mechanically ventilated unable to self-report medical and surgical critical care patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01744717.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Dimensión del Dolor , Psicometría , Cuidados Críticos , Humanos , Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
18.
Med Intensiva ; 40(4): 238-45, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26391738

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To study the characteristics and outcomes of patients in the ICU with severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) over a 15-year surveillance period. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of episodes of SCAP, and assessed the epidemiology, etiology, treatment and outcomes of patients admitted to the ICU, comparing three periods (1999-2003, 2004-2008 and 2009-2013). RESULTS: A total of 458 patients were diagnosed with SCAP. The overall cumulative incidence was 37.4 episodes/1000 admissions, with a progressive increase over the three periods (P<0.001). Patients fulfilling the two major IDSA/ATS criteria at admission increased from 64.2% in the first period to 82.5% in the last period (P=0.005). Streptococcus pneumoniae was the prevalent pathogen. The incidence of bacteremia was 23.1%, and a progressive significant reduction in overall incidence was observed over the three periods (P=0.02). Globally, 91% of the patients received appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, increasing from 78.3% in the first period to 97.7% in the last period (P<0.001). Combination antibiotic therapy (betalactam+macrolide or fluoroquinolone) increased significantly from the first period (61%) to the last period (81.3%) (P<0.001). Global ICU mortality was 25.1%, and decreased over the three periods (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a progressively higher incidence and severity of SCAP in our ICU, crude ICU mortality decreased by 18%. The increased use of combined antibiotic therapy and the decreasing rates of bacteremia were associated to improved patient prognosis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad/tendencias , Neumonía Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España/epidemiología
19.
Med Intensiva ; 40(1): 9-17, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25759114

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and identify predictors of failure of noninvasive ventilation. DESIGN: A retrospective, longitudinal descriptive study was made. SETTING: Adult patients with acute respiratory failure. PATIENTS: A total of 410 consecutive patients with noninvasive ventilation treated in an Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary university hospital from 2006 to 2011. PROCEDURES: Noninvasive ventilation. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Demographic variables and clinical and laboratory test parameters at the start and two hours after the start of noninvasive ventilation. Evolution during admission to the Unit and until hospital discharge. RESULTS: The failure rate was 50%, with an overall mortality rate of 33%. A total of 156 patients had hypoxemic respiratory failure, 87 postextubation respiratory failure, 78 exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 61 hypercapnic respiratory failure without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 28 had acute pulmonary edema. The failure rates were 74%, 54%, 27%, 31% and 21%, respectively. The etiology of respiratory failure, serum bilirubin at the start, APACHEII score, radiological findings, the need for sedation to tolerate noninvasive ventilation, changes in level of consciousness, PaO2/FIO2 ratio, respiratory rate and heart rate from the start and two hours after the start of noninvasive ventilation were independently associated to failure. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation varies according to the etiology of respiratory failure. Its use in hypoxemic respiratory failure and postextubation respiratory failure should be assessed individually. Predictors of failure could be useful to prevent delayed intubation.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Humanos , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Med Intensiva ; 40(8): 499-510, 2016 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27569679

RESUMEN

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is a common finding in critically ill patients. It is characterized by a progressive deterioration of the relaxation and the compliance of the left ventricle. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography is a cornerstone in its diagnosis. Acute pulmonary edema associated with hypertensive crisis is the most frequent presentation of diastolic dysfunction critically ill patients. Myocardial ischemia, sepsis and weaning failure from mechanical ventilation also may be associated with diastolic dysfunction. The treatment is based on the reduction of pulmonary congestion and left ventricular filling pressures. Some studies have found a prognostic role of diastolic dysfunction in some diseases such as sepsis. The present review aims to analyze thoroughly the echocardiographic diagnosis and the most frequent scenarios in critically ill patients in whom diastolic dysfunction plays a key role.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Ecocardiografía Doppler , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatías , Ecocardiografía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA