Can polysomnography be replaced by ApneaGraph200 for OSA diagnosis? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It is yet unknown if the ApneaGraph200 system can replace the Polysomnography system (PSG), which is now the gold standard for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference in apnea hypopnea index and lowest oxygen saturation levels between the AG200 system and PSG system. METHODS: Utilizing PubMed, Elsevier, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), a thorough literature search was carried out. Eligible studies contrasting the AG200 system and the PSG system were found by two separate researchers. Review Manager (version 5.3) was adopted for data synthesis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis A pooled the comparison of AHI between the AG and PSG groups, and included seven studies involving a total of 419 participants, which revealed that there was a significant difference in AHI between the above two diagnostic methods (standard mean difference (SMD) = - 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) = - 0.32 to - 0.05, P = 0.008). As a supplementary, meta-analysis B pooled the comparison of lowest oxygen saturation between the AG and PSG groups and included five studies involving a total of 224 participants. It revealed that there was no significant difference between the AG group and the PSG group (SMD = 0.09, 95% CI - 0.24 to 0.43, P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: The ApneaGraph200 system can be used for the initial screening of OSA patients, but it is not a complete alternative to polysomnography for the diagnosis and severity of the OSA condition.

Comparison of full-night and ambulatory polysomnography with ApneaGraph in the subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

The localization of the obstruction is crucial in determining the appropriate surgical treatment for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS); ApneaGraph has been introduced for diagnosis of OSAS and localization of airway obstruction level. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of ApneaGraph for both clinical staging and site of obstruction. Thirty male OSAS patients were prospectively enrolled in this clinical trial. The following parameter were included to the study: Body mass indexes and neck circumferences of the subjects, Epworth sleepiness scale, site of obstruction detected by flexible endoscopy and ApneaGraph, apnea hypopnea index (AHI), apnea index, hypopnea index, maximal oxygen desaturation and average oxygen saturation which were detected by both polysomnography (PSG) and ApneaGraph devices. Our data presented that, although AHI measured by ApneaGraph and PSG were significantly correlated; severity stages of the subjects were different in 44 % of the subjects when based on AHI of ApneaGraph, compared to PSG. Majority of the changes were from severe OSAS to mild or moderate levels. Similar dominant collapse levels were detected in 64 % of the subjects by both devices. It was seen that transpalatal obstruction was better correlated between ApneaGraph and flexible endoscopy. As a conclusion, we might assume that ApneaGraph can be used as a screener for OSAS and it appears to be a more reliable device to confirm dominancy of palatal level obstruction.

Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values.

PURPOSE: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a respiratory disorder characterized by repeated obstructive episodes affecting upper airways.This study aims at examining the anatomical craniofacial and pharyngeal characteristics of the patient as to identify the obstructive site which triggers the pathologic process.Correlations between otolaryngologic data observed in the patient and the cephalometric ones for the identification of the obstructive site were also highlighted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We worked on a sample of 16 patients, 12 males and 4 females, attended to at the Otolaryngology Operative Unit of Bari University Hospital.The patients underwent an otolaryngologic (ORL) diagnostic procedure which provided for ApneaGraph (AG) recording, and a dental diagnostic procedure with cephalometric assessment. RESULTS: The statistical analysis highlighted a strict correlation between the otolaryngologic value of AHI and the cephalometric values of the ANB angle, with the distance between the hyoid bone and the mandibular plane and with the distance between the hyoid bone and the plane passing between C3 and Me. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a concurrence between the ORL diagnosis of the obstruction level assessed with AG and the cephalometric values regarding respiratory tracts (IPAS and SAS). More precisely, we observed the correlation between the otolaryngologic value of AHI with cephalometric values of the ANB angle, with the distance between hyoid bone and mandibular plan, and with the distance between the hyoid bone and the plane passing between C3 and Me. Furthermore, the identification of the caudal position of the hyoid bone can be considered an alarm bell in the diagnosis of severe OSAS.

Can apneagraphy change our approach in management of snoring and sleep apnoea?

UNLABELLED: To evaluate role of overnight domiciliary apneagraph in diagnosing severity of sleep apnoea. Prospective audit of 37 patients with Epworth sleepiness score over ten and all patients with history of sleep apnoea presenting to ENT outpatient clinic investigated with apneagraph. Data analysed initially with pulse oximetry findings alone followed by analysis with full apneagraph findings. RESULTS: Data analysed with pulse oximetry alone showed 31 patients to be simple snorers, but on analysis with apneagraph, 11 of these were shown to be suffering from moderate and one with severe sleep apnoea. There was no correlation between Epworth sleepiness score and severity of sleep apnoea. CONCLUSION: Management plan can be more evidence based by using apneagraph as a mini sleep study in investigating patients with history of obstructive sleep apnoea. Apneagraph could also be used in diagnosing the level of obstruction in snorers; however, this aspect needs further studying.