RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tandem lesions consist of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis or occlusion, most commonly of atherosclerosis or dissection etiology, plus a large vessel occlusion. In this study, we compare outcomes in patients with atherosclerosis versus dissection of the cervical ICA. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study includes data from tandem lesion patients who underwent endovascular treatment from 2015 to 2020. Atherosclerosis was defined as ICA stenosis/occlusion associated with a calcified lesion and dissection by the presence of a tapered or flame-shaped lesion and intramural hematoma. Primary outcome: 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2); secondary outcomes: 90-day favorable shift in the modified Rankin Scale score, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2c-3, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma type 2, petechial hemorrhage, distal embolization, early neurological improvement, and mortality. Analysis was performed with matching by inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: We included 526 patients (68 [59-76] years; 31% females); 11.2% presented dissection and 88.8%, atherosclerosis. Patients with dissection were younger, had lower rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history. They also exhibited higher rates of ICA occlusion, multiple stents (>1), and lower rates of carotid self-expanding stents. After matching and adjusting for covariates, there were no differences in 90-day functional independence. The rate of successful recanalization was significantly lower in the dissection group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.16-0.91]; P=0.031), which also had significantly higher rates of distal emboli (adjusted odds ratio, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.15-5.55]; P=0.021). There were no differences in other outcomes. Acute ICA stenting seemed to increase the effect of atherosclerosis in successful recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that among patients with acute stroke with tandem lesions, cervical ICA dissection is associated with higher rates of distal embolism and lower rates of successful recanalization than atherosclerotic lesions. Using techniques to minimize the risk of distal embolism may mitigate this contrast. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted to fully understand these associations.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/terapia , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , EmboliaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carotid siphon calcification (CSC) serves as a marker of atherosclerosis and therefore may influence the outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to analyze the impact of CSC on neurological outcomes, ischemia, and vasospasm. METHODS: A total of 716 patients with aSAH were treated between December 2004 and June 2016 in our central European tertiary neurovascular care center in Essen, Germany. CSC was recorded using the Woodcock scale (grades 0-3) on a computed tomography scan. Study end points included an unfavorable outcome at 6 months post-aSAH (modified Rankin Scale score ≥4), vasospasm, and early cerebral ischemia (72 hours) and delayed cerebral ischemia (delayed cerebral ischemia; >72 hours) in the follow-up computed tomography scans. The associations were adjusted for patients' baseline characteristics and secondary complications. Finally, within a subgroup analysis, patients with and without daily aspirin intake after endovascular aneurysm occlusion were compared. RESULTS: Increasing grades of CSC were associated with lower rates of vasospasm in the anterior circulation. Severe CSC (grade 3) was independently related to the risk of an unfavorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.06 [95% CI, 1.98-8.33]; P<0.001) and early cerebral ischemia (aOR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.03-2.43]; P=0.035) but not delayed cerebral ischemia (aOR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.67-1.73]; P=0.763). In the aspirin subgroup analysis, the negative effect of severe CSC on functional outcome remained significant only in aSAH cases without aspirin (aOR, 5.47 [95% CI, 2.38-12.54]; P<0.001). In contrast, there was no association between severe CSC and unfavorable outcomes among individuals with daily aspirin intake (aOR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.59-4.21]; P=0.603). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest CSC as a cerebrovascular risk factor resulting in higher rates of early cerebral ischemia and unfavorable outcomes after aSAH. However, by increasing arterial stiffness, CSC might lower the probability of vasospasm, which could explain the missing link between CSC and delayed cerebral ischemia. Additionally, aspirin intake seems to potentially mitigate the negative impact of CSC on aSAH outcome. Further investigations are needed to confirm the observations from the present study.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal , Humanos , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasoespasmo Intracraneal/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/complicaciones , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Cervical artery dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in young adults. Data conflict on the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of patients with suspected cervical artery dissection, leading to variability in practice. We aim to provide an overview of cervical artery dissection in the setting of minor or no reported mechanical trigger with a focus on summarizing the available evidence and providing suggestions on the diagnostic evaluation, treatment approaches, and outcomes. Writing group members drafted their sections using a literature search focused on publications between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 2022, and included randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, meta-analyses, opinion papers, case series, and case reports. The writing group chair and vice chair compiled the manuscript and obtained writing group members' approval. Cervical artery dissection occurs as a result of the interplay among risk factors, minor trauma, anatomic and congenital abnormalities, and genetic predisposition. The diagnosis can be challenging both clinically and radiologically. In patients with acute ischemic stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection, acute treatment strategies such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are reasonable in otherwise eligible patients. We suggest that the antithrombotic therapy choice be individualized and continued for at least 3 to 6 months. The risk of recurrent dissection is low, and preventive measures may be considered early after the diagnosis and continued in high-risk patients. Ongoing longitudinal and population-based observational studies are needed to close the present gaps on preferred antithrombotic regimens considering clinical and radiographic prognosticators of cervical artery dissection.
Asunto(s)
Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral , Humanos , Adulto Joven , American Heart Association , Arterias , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico , Disección de la Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory type focal cerebral arteriopathy (FCA-i) in the anterior circulation (AC) is well characterized, and the focal cerebral arteriopathy severity score (FCASS) reflects the severity of the disease. We identified cases of FCA-i in the posterior circulation (PC) and adapted the FCASS to describe these cases. METHODS: In this comparative cohort study, patients from the Swiss NeuroPaediatric Stroke Registry with ischemic stroke due to FCA-i between January 2000 and December 2018 were analyzed. A comparison between PC and AC cases regarding pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and pediatric stroke outcome measure and FCASS was performed. We estimated infarct size by the modified pediatric Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score in children with AC stroke and the adapted Bernese posterior diffusion-weighted imaging score in the PC. RESULTS: Thirty-five children with a median age of 6.3 (interquartile range, 2.7-8.2 [95% CI, 0.9-15.6]; 20 male; 57.1%) years with FCA-i were identified. The total incidence rate was 0.15/100â 000/year (95% CI, 0.11-0.21). Six had PC-FCA-i. Time to final FCASS was longer in the PC compared with AC; the evolution of FCASS did not differ. Initial pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was higher in children with FCA-i in the PC with a median of 10.0 (interquartile range, 5.75-21.0) compared with 4.5 (interquartile range, 2.0-8.0) in those with AC-FCA-i. Different from the anterior cases, PC infarct volume did not correlate with higher discharge, maximum, or final FCASS scores (Pearson correlation coefficient [r], 0.25, 0.35, and 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: FCA-i also affects the PC. These cases should be included in future investigations into FCA-i. Although it did not correlate with clinical outcomes in our cohort, the modified FCASS may well serve as a marker for the evolution of the arteriopathy in posterior FCA-i.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Estudios de Cohortes , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/complicaciones , InfartoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many ischemic strokes are diagnosed as embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Recent evidence suggests that nonstenotic carotid plaque (nsCP) may be a substantial contributor to the risk for ESUS. We aimed to investigate the risk factor profile associated with nsCP in ESUS and defined stroke etiologies. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, we investigated consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke due to ESUS, small-vessel disease, or cardioembolism proven by magnetic resonance imaging. The association of vascular risk factors age, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dyslipoproteinemia, body mass index, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, kidney failure, and history of stroke with the presence of nsCP was investigated using binary logistic regression analysis and further stratified by stroke etiology and sex. RESULTS: In total, 609 patients (median age, 76 years; 46% women) who were treated from 2018 to 2020 were considered. In patients with ESUS, sex played a more important role for the prevalence of nsCP than in defined etiologies. Female patients with ESUS had lower odds of exhibiting nsCP compared with male patients with ESUS (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.15-0.86]). In male patients with ESUS, we observed that age (adjusted odds ratio per 10-year increase, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.26-5.17]) and hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 2.49 [95% CI, 0.56-11.1]) were the main risk factors for nsCP, whereas in female patients with ESUS also tobacco use was particularly relevant (adjusted odds ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 0.61-22.5]). These results were in line with a sensitivity analysis in nsCP located ipsilateral to the infarct. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences play an important role in nsCP prevalence in patients with ESUS. These findings may have important implications for the management in targeted secondary prevention following ESUS.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Embólico , Hipertensión , Embolia Intracraneal , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Placa Aterosclerótica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Accidente Cerebrovascular Embólico/complicaciones , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/complicaciones , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Placa Aterosclerótica/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Embolia Intracraneal/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The external carotid artery (ECA) plays a major role in supplying blood to the head and neck. Although impeded blood flow in the ECA is expected to affect orofacial functions, few studies have shown how blood flow obstruction in the ECA contributes to impairment of these functions, including chewing and swallowing. This study was performed to investigate the effects of ECA ligation (ECAL) on immediate and long-term changes in masticatory and swallowing functions as well as the jaw-opening reflex evoked in the digastric muscle. The experiments were carried out using male Sprague-Dawley rats. In the acute experiment, the digastric reflex evoked by low-threshold electrical stimulation of the inferior alveolar nerve and the swallow reflex, identified by digastric and thyrohyoid electromyographic (EMG) bursts, were compared between before and 1 h after ECAL. The chronic experiment was conducted on freely moving rats. EMGs of the masseter, digastric, and thyrohyoid muscles were chronically recorded. The long-term effects of ECAL on behavior and muscle histology were compared between rats with an intact ECA and rats with ECAL. In the acute experiment, the peak amplitude of the digastric reflex on the ECAL side was significantly decreased 1 h after ECAL. In the chronic experiment, although most parameters of the masticatory and swallowing EMGs were not significantly different between the groups, the results suggest wide variation of the effect of ECAL on the muscles. Blood supply compensation from collaterals of the internal carotid artery may be permanent in some animals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The inhibitory effect of unilateral external carotid artery ligation (ECAL) on the ipsilateral digastric reflex was small but evident. Most parameters of masticatory and swallowing muscle activity were not significantly different after ECAL. Wide variation was noted in the effect of ECAL on the ipsilateral muscle activity. Blood supply compensation from collaterals of the internal carotid artery may occur in response to the impaired blood flow.
Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Externa , Reflejo , Ratas , Animales , Masculino , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Electromiografía , Reflejo/fisiología , Masticación/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Orosomucoid (ORM) has been reported as a biomarker of carotid atherosclerosis, but the role of ORM 2, a subtype of ORM, in carotid atherosclerotic plaque formation and the underlying mechanism have not been established. METHODS: Plasma was collected from patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and healthy participants and assessed using mass spectrometry coupled with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) technology to identify differentially expressed proteins. The key proteins and related pathways were identified via western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and polymerase chain reaction of carotid artery plaque tissues and in vitro experiments involving vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). RESULTS: We screened 33 differentially expressed proteins out of 535 proteins in the plasma. Seventeen proteins showed increased expressions in the CAS groups relative to the healthy groups, while 16 proteins showed decreased expressions during iTRAQ and bioinformatic analysis. The reactive oxygen species metabolic process was the most common enrichment pathway identified by Gene Ontology analysis, while ORM2, PRDX2, GPX3, HP, HBB, ANXA5, PFN1, CFL1, and S100A11 were key proteins identified by STRING and MCODE analysis. ORM2 showed increased expression in patients with CAS plaques, and ORM2 was accumulated in smooth muscle cells. Oleic acid increased the lipid accumulation and ORM2 and PRDX6 expressions in the VSMCs. The recombinant-ORM2 also increased the lipid accumulation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the VSMCs. The expressions of ORM2 and PRDX-6 were correlated, and MJ33 (an inhibitor of PRDX6-PLA2) decreased ROS production and lipid accumulation in VSMCs. CONCLUSION: ORM2 may be a biomarker for CAS; it induced lipid accumulation and ROS production in VSMCs during atherosclerosis plaque formation. However, the relationships between ORM2 and PRDX-6 underlying lipid accumulation-induced plaque vulnerability require further research.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Estenosis Carotídea , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/metabolismo , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Orosomucoide/metabolismo , Músculo Liso Vascular/metabolismo , Aterosclerosis/metabolismo , Placa Aterosclerótica/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Arterias Carótidas/metabolismo , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/metabolismo , Lípidos , Profilinas/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, noninvasive imaging techniques and circulating biomarkers are still insufficient to accurately assess carotid plaque stability, and an in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to plaque instability is still lacking. METHODS: We established a clinical study cohort containing 182 patients with carotid artery stenosis. After screening, 39 stable and 49 unstable plaques were included in the discovery group, and quantitative proteomics analysis based on data independent acquisition was performed for these plaque samples. Additionally, 35 plaques were included in the validation group to validate the proteomics results by immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS: A total of 397 differentially expressed proteins were identified in stable and unstable plaques. These proteins are primarily involved in ferroptosis and lipid metabolism-related functions and pathways. Plaque validation results showed that ferroptosis- and lipid metabolism-related proteins had different expression trends in stable plaques versus unstable fibrous cap regions and lipid core regions. Ferroptosis- and lipid metabolism-related mechanisms in plaque stability were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may provide a valuable strategy for revealing the mechanisms affecting plaque stability and will facilitate the discovery of specific biomarkers to broaden the therapeutic scope.
Asunto(s)
Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Proteoma , Arterias Carótidas , Biomarcadores , Espectrometría de MasasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound-Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real-time monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p = .047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p = .032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high-intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI-positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI-negative group. CONCLUSION: The number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Criocirugía , Venas Pulmonares , Humanos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Venas Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas Pulmonares/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Factores de Riesgo , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Ultrasonografía de las Arterias CarótidasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare conventional vessel wall MR imaging techniques and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to determine the optimal sequence for detecting carotid artery calcification. METHODS: Twenty-two patients who underwent carotid vessel wall MR imaging and neck CT were enrolled. Four slices of 6-mm sections from the bilateral internal carotid bifurcation were subdivided into 4 segments according to clock position (0-3, 3-6, 6-9, and 9-12) and assessed for calcification. Two blinded radiologists independently reviewed a total of 704 segments and scored the likelihood of calcification using a 5-point scale on spin-echo imaging, FLASH, and QSM. The observer performance for detecting calcification was evaluated by a multireader, multiple-case receiver operating characteristic study. Weighted κ statistics were calculated to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS: QSM had a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85, which was significantly higher than that of any other sequence (p < 0.01) and showed substantial interreader agreement (κ = 0.68). A segment with a score of 3-5 was defined as positive, and a segment with a score of 1-2 was defined as negative; the sensitivity and specificity of QSM were 0.75 and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: QSM was the most reliable MR sequence for the detection of plaque calcification.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Placa Aterosclerótica , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/patología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Carótida Interna/patología , Imagen por Resonancia MagnéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the natural history of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis progression. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective cohort study analyzed patients diagnosed with ICA stenosis of 50% or greater on duplex ultrasound from 2015 to 2022. Subjects were drawn from our institutional Intersocietal Accreditation Commission-accredited noninterventional vascular laboratory database. Primary outcomes were incidences of disease progression, and stroke or revascularization after index study. Progression was defined as an increase in stenosis classification category. Imaging, demographic, and clinical data was obtained from our institutional electronic medical record via a database mining query. Cases were analyzed at the patient and artery levels, with severity corresponding to the greatest degree of ICA stenosis on index and follow-up studies. RESULTS: Of 577 arteries in 467 patients, mean cohort age was 73.5 ± 8.9 years at the time of the index study, and 45.0% (n = 210) were female. Patients were followed with duplex ultrasound for a mean of 42.2 ± 22.7 months. Of 577 arteries, 65.5% (n = 378) at the index imaging study had moderate (50%-69%) stenosis, 23.7% (n = 137) had severe (70%-99%) stenosis, and 10.7% (n = 62) were occluded. These three groups had significant differences in age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia prevalence, and proportion on best medical therapy. Of the 467-patient cohort, 56.5% (n = 264) were on best medical therapy, defined as smoking cessation, treatment with an antiplatelet agent, statin, and antihypertensive and glycemic agents as indicated. Mean time to progression for affected arteries was 28.0 ± 20.5 months. Of those arteries with nonocclusive disease at diagnosis, 21.3% (n = 123) progressed in their level of stenosis. Older age, diabetes, and a history of vasculitis were associated with stenosis progression, whereas antiplatelet agent use trended towards decreased progression rates. Of the 467 patients, 5.6% (n = 26) developed symptoms; of those, 38.5% (n = 10) had ischemic strokes, 26.9% (n = 7) had hemispheric transient ischemic attacks, 11.5% (n = 3) had amaurosis fugax, and 23.1% (n = 6) had other symptoms. A history of head and neck cancer was positively associated with symptom development. Of 577 affected arteries, 16.6% (n = 96) underwent intervention; 81% (n = 78) of interventions were for asymptomatic disease and 19% (n = 18) were for symptomatic disease. No patient-level factors were associated with risk of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of carotid stenosis patients experience progression of disease. Physicians should consider long-term surveillance on all patients with carotid disease, with increased attention paid to those with risk factors for progression, particularly those with diabetes and a history of vasculitis.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Diabetes Mellitus , Vasculitis , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Factores de Riesgo , Vasculitis/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Investigations into imaging modalities in the diagnosis of extracranial carotid artery occlusion (CAO) have raised questions about the inter-modality comparability of duplex ultrasound (DUS) and cross-sectional imaging (CSI). This study examines the relationship between DUS and CSI diagnoses of extracranial CAO. METHODS: This single-institution retrospective analysis studied patients with CAO diagnosed by DUS from 2010 to 2021. Patients were identified in our office-based accredited vascular laboratory database. Imaging and clinical data was obtained via our institutional electronic medical record. Primary outcome was discrepancy between DUS and CSI modalities. Secondary outcomes included incidence of stroke and intervention subsequent to CAO diagnosis. RESULTS: Of our 140-patient cohort, 95 patients (67.9%) had DUS follow-up (mean, 42.7 ± 31.3 months). At index duplex, 68.0% of individuals (n = 51) were asymptomatic. Seventy-five patients (53.6%) had CSI of the carotids after DUS CAO diagnosis; 18 (24%) underwent magnetic resonance imaging and 57 (76%) underwent computed tomography. Indications for CSI included follow-up of DUS findings of carotid stenosis/occlusion (44%), stroke/transient ischemic attack (16%), other symptoms (12%), preoperative evaluation (2.7%), unrelated pathology follow-up (9.3%), and outside institution imaging with unavailable indications (16%). When comparing patients with CSI and those without, there were no differences with regard to symptoms at diagnosis, prior neck interventions, or hypertension. There was a significant difference between cross-sectionally imaged and non-imaged patients in anti-hypertensive medications (72% vs 53.8%; P = .04). Despite initial DUS diagnoses of carotid occlusion, 10 patients (13.3%) ultimately had CSI indicating patent carotids. Four of these 10 patients had stenoses of â¼99% (with 1 string sign), four of 70% to 99%, one of 50% to 69%, and one of less than 50% on CSI. The majority of patients (70%) had CSI within 1 month of the index ultrasound. There were no significant relationships between imaging discrepancies and body mass index, heart failure, upper body edema, carotid artery calcification, and neck hardware. Eight individuals (10.7%) underwent ipsilateral revascularization; 62.5% (n = 5) were carotid endarterectomy procedures, and the remaining three procedures were a transcervical carotid revascularization, subclavian to internal carotid artery bypass, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting. Eight patients (10.7%) underwent contralateral revascularization, with the same distribution of procedures as those ipsilateral to occlusions. Two of the 10 patients with discrepancies underwent carotid endarterectomy, and one underwent carotid stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, duplex diagnosis of CAO is associated with a greater than 10% discordance when compared with CSI. These patients may benefit from closer surveillance as well as confirmatory computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography. Further work is needed to determine the optimal diagnostic modality for CAO.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas , Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Arterias Carótidas , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: On October 11, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) expanded the indications for carotid artery stenting (CAS) to include patients with ≥50% symptomatic or ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of this article was to investigate the implications of this decision. METHODS: The reasons behind the increased coverage for CAS are analyzed and discussed, as well as the various Societies supporting or opposing the expansion of indications for CAS. RESULTS: The benefits associated with expanding CAS indications include providing an additional therapeutic option to patients and enabling individualization of treatment according to patient-specific characteristics. The drawbacks of expanding CAS indications include a possible bias in decision-making and an increase in inappropriate CAS procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The purpose of the CMS recommendation to expand indications for CAS is to improve the available therapeutic options for patients. Hopefully this decision will not be misinterpreted and will be used to improve patient options and patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Selección de Paciente , Stents , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Formulación de Políticas , Medicare/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is associated with lower risk of perioperative stroke compared with transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. However, there is discrepancy in data regarding long-term outcomes. We aimed to compare long-term outcomes of CEA vs TFCAS using the Medicare-matched Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database. METHODS: We assessed patients undergoing first-time CEA or TFCAS in Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular-Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network from January 2003 to December 2018. Patients with prior history of carotid revascularization, nontransfemoral stenting, stenting performed without distal embolic protection, multiple or nonatherosclerotic lesions, or concomitant procedures were excluded. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, any stroke, and a combined end point of death or stroke. We additionally performed propensity score matching and stratification based on symptomatic status. RESULTS: A total of 80,146 carotid revascularizations were performed, of which 72,615 were CEA and 7531 were TFCAS. CEA was associated with significantly lower risk of death (57.8% vs 70.4%, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.52; P < .001), stroke (21.3% vs 26.6%; aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.57-0.69; P < .001) and combined end point of death and stroke (65.3% vs 76.5%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55; P < .001) at 10 years. These findings were reflected in the propensity-matched cohort (combined end point: 34.6% vs 46.8%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.46-0.62) at 4 years, as well as stratified analyses of combined end point by symptomatic status (asymptomatic: 63.2% vs 74.9%; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43-0.58; P < .001; symptomatic: 69.9% vs 78.3%; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.45-0.59; P < .001) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of North American real-world data, CEA was associated with greater long-term survival and fewer strokes compared with TFCAS. These findings support the continued use of CEA as the first-line revascularization procedure.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Medicare , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Plaque ulceration in carotid artery stenosis is a risk factor for cerebral ischemic events; however, the characteristics that determine plaque vulnerability are not fully understood. We thus assessed the association between plaque ulceration sites and cerebrovascular ischemic attack. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 72 consecutive patients diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis with plaque ulcers. After excluding patients with pseudo-occlusion, a history of previous carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting before the ulcer was first discovered, follow-up data of less than 1 month, or carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting performed within 1 month after the ulcer was first discovered, 60 patients were ultimately included. Patients were divided into proximal and distal groups based on the ulcer location relative to the most stenotic point. The primary endpoints were ipsilateral cerebrovascular ischemic events ("ischemic events"), such as amaurosis fugax, transient ischemic attack, or ischemic stroke due to carotid artery stenosis with plaque ulceration. The association between ulcer location and ischemic events was also assessed. RESULTS: In the patients with plaque ulcer, more patients had proximal than distal plaque ulcers (39 vs 21; P = .028). The median follow-up duration was 3.8 years (interquartile range, 1.5-6.2 years). Nineteen patients (32%) experienced ischemic event. Ischemic events occurred more frequently in the distal than in the proximal group (18% vs 59%; P = .005). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a significantly shorter event-free time in the distal group (log-rank P = .021). In univariate analysis, distal ulcer location was associated with ischemic events (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-7.65; P = .03). Multivariate analysis using two different models also showed that distal ulcer location was independently associated with ischemic events (Model 1: OR, 3.85; 95% CI, 1.26-11.78; P = .03; Model 2: OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 1.49-12.49; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with carotid artery stenosis and plaque ulcers located distal to the most stenotic point are more likely to experience cerebrovascular ischemic attacks. Therefore, carotid plaques with ulcers located distal to the most stenotic point may be a potential indication for surgical treatment.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Postoperative outcomes following carotid revascularization are understudied in Asian patients. We aimed to assess whether disease severity and postoperative outcomes following carotid revascularization differ between Asian and White patients, and whether this varies with Asian procedure density. METHODS: We analyzed the Vascular Quality Initiative Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting datasets from 2003 to 2021. Regions were divided into tertiles based on Asian procedure density. Propensity scores were used to match Asian and White patients based on patient factors and procedure type. The primary outcome variable was a collapsed composite of in-hospital ipsilateral stroke/death/myocardial infarction. χ2 tests were used to assess association between Asian race and disease severity, center and surgeon volume, and 1-year outcomes. Logistic and Cox regressions were performed between the matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1766 Asian and 159,608 White patients underwent carotid revascularization, and we identified 2704 patients (1352 Asian and 1352 White) in the matched cohorts. Among propensity matched patients, all-comer Asian patients more commonly had >80% ipsilateral stenosis (63% vs 52%; P < .001) and a moderate/severe preoperative Rankin score (7.6% vs 5.1%; P = .007). The rate of in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction was higher in Asian patients (2.6% vs 1.3%; P = .012), and this disparity was more pronounced in the lowest tertile of Asian procedure density (4.3% vs 0.5%; P < .001). Logistic regression in the propensity-matched cohort demonstrated Asian race was associated with lower odds of intervention at highest volume centers (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.3; P < .001) and by highest volume surgeons (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3-0.4; P < .001). Asian race was associated with higher odds of in-hospital stroke/death/myocardial infarction (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8; P = .031), and there was a significant interaction between Asian procedure density and the relationship between Asian race and this outcome (interaction P = .001). After accounting for center and surgeon volume, the association of Asian race and the composite outcome was mitigated (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.7-3.3; P = .300). Cox regression between the matched cohorts demonstrated that Asian race was associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P = .001) and higher risk of 1-year reintervention (hazard ratio, 16; 95% CI, 1.8-142; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Asian patients are more likely to present with a higher degree of carotid stenosis, higher preoperative risk, and experience worse perioperative outcomes. The association of Asian race with perioperative stroke/death/myocardial infarction varies with Asian procedure density and is also confounded by center and surgeon volume. These results highlight the importance of understanding referral patterns and cultural effects on outcomes disparities in Asian patients.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The relationship between baseline Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in patients with prior stroke and optimal timing of carotid revascularization is unclear. Therefore, we evaluated the timing of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS), transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after prior stroke, stratified by preoperative mRS. METHODS: We identified patients with recent stroke who underwent tfCAS, TCAR, or CEA between 2012 and 2021. Patients were stratified by preoperative mRS (0-1, 2, 3-4, or 5) and days from symptom onset to intervention (time to intervention; ≤2 days, 3-14 days, 15-90 days, and 91-180 days). First, we performed univariate analyses comparing in-hospital outcomes between separate mRS or time-to-intervention cohorts for all carotid intervention methods. Afterward, multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and comorbidities across groups, and outcomes between the various intervention methods were compared. Primary outcome was the in-hospital stroke/death rate. RESULTS: We identified 4260 patients who underwent tfCAS, 3130 patients who underwent TCAR, and 20,012 patients who underwent CEA. Patients were most likely to have minimal disability (mRS, 0-1 [61%]) and least likely to have severe disability (mRS, 5 [1.5%]). Patients most often underwent revascularization in 3 to 14 days (45%). Across all intervention methods, increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death (all P < .03), whereas increasing time to intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates (all P < .01). After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, undergoing tfCAS was associated with higher stroke/death compared with undergoing CEA (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-1.9; P < .01) or undergoing TCAR (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.8; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with preoperative stroke, optimal timing for carotid revascularization varies with stroke severity. Increasing preoperative mRS was associated with higher procedural in-hospital stroke/death rates, whereas increasing time to-intervention was associated with lower stroke/death rates. Overall, patients undergoing CEA were associated with lower in-hospital stroke/deaths. To determine benefit for delayed intervention, these results should be weighed against the risk of recurrent stroke during the interval before intervention.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Stents , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Arterias Carótidas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: It is unclear whether patients with prior neck radiation therapy (RT) are at high risk for carotid artery stenting (CAS). We aimed to delineate 30-day perioperative and 3-year long-term outcomes in patients treated for radiation-induced stenotic lesions by the transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) approach to determine comparative risk and to ascertain the optimal intervention in this cohort. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Vascular Quality Initiative CAS registry for patients with prior neck radiation who had undergone either TCAR or TFCAS. The Student t-test and the χ2 test were used to compare baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox Hazard Proportional analysis were used to compare perioperative and long-term differences between patients with and without prior neck radiation following TCAR and TFCAS. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the incidence of 3-year adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 72,656 patients (TCAR, 40,879; TFCAS, 31,777) were included in the analysis. Of these, 4151 patients had a history of neck radiation. Patients with a history of neck radiation were more likely to be younger, white, and have fewer comorbidities than patients with no neck radiation history. After adjustment for confounding factors, there was no difference in relative risk of 30-day perioperative stroke (P = .11), death (P = .36), or myocardial infarction (MI) (P = .61) between TCAR patients with or without a history of neck radiation. The odds of stroke/death (P = .10) and stroke/death/MI (P = .07) were also not statistically significant. In patients with prior neck radiation, TCAR had lower odds for in-hospital stroke/death/MI (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.99; P = .05) and access site complications than TFCAS. At year 3, patients with prior neck radiation had an increased hazard for mortality after TCAR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.51; P = .04) and TFCAS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58; P = .001). Patients with prior neck radiation also experienced an increased hazard for reintervention after TCAR (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.45-3.20; P < .001) and TFCAS (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02-2.73; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior neck radiation had a similar relative risk of 30-day perioperative adverse events as patients with no neck radiation after adjustment for baseline demographics and disease characteristics. In these patients, TCAR was associated with reduced odds of perioperative stroke/death/MI as compared with TFCAS. However, patients with prior neck radiation were at increased risk for 3-year mortality and reintervention.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Arteria Femoral , Arterias Carótidas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous carotid artery dissections (sCADs) are the common cause of stroke in middle-aged and young people. There is still a lack of clinical classification to guide the management of sCAD. We reviewed our experience with 179 patients with sCAD and proposed a new classification for sCAD with prognostic and therapeutic significance. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from June 2018 to June 2023 of patients with sCAD treated at a large tertiary academic institution in an urban city in China. Based on imaging results, we categorize sCAD into four types: type â , intramural hematoma or dissection with <70% luminal narrowing; type â ¡, intramural hematoma or dissection with ≥70% luminal narrowing; type â ¢, dissecting aneurysm; type â £A, extracranial carotid artery occlusion; and type â £B, tandem occlusion. We compared the clinical data and prognostic outcomes among various types of sCADs. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients and 197 dissected arteries met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the 179 patients with sCAD was 49.5 years, 78% were male, and 18 patients (10%) had bilateral sCAD. According to our classification, there were 56 type â (28.4%), 50 type â ¡ (25.4%), 60 type â ¢ (30.5%), and 31 type â £ (15.7%) dissections. During a mean hospitalization length of 11.4 ± 47.0 days, there were nine recurrent strokes (4.6%) after medical treatment, two type â ¢ dissections (1.0%), seven type â £ dissections (3.6%), all ipsilateral, and one death. Overall, there were seven (3.6%, 1 type â dissection, 3 type â ¡ dissections, 2 type â ¢ dissections, and 1 type â £ dissection) recurrent strokes and three (1.5%, all type â ¢ dissections) recurrent transient ischemic attacks in patients treated with just medical therapy during the follow-up period, all ipsilateral, with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-59 months). These patients did not undergo further intervention due to the high difficulty associated with endovascular treatment (EVT) or the mild nature of recurrent cerebral ischemic symptoms. Twenty-nine type I dissections (51.8%) were completely recanalized after antithrombotic therapy. A total of 19 type II dissections (38%) and 44 type III dissections (73%) received EVT for persistent flow-limited dissections, enlargement of dissecting aneurysms, or aggravation of neurological symptoms despite antithrombotic therapy. Type â £ dissections are more likely to lead to the occurrence of ischemic stroke and presented with more severe symptoms. Eight type IVB dissections (33%) received acute phase intervention due to distal thromboembolism or aggravation of neurological symptoms after medical treatment. In terms of cerebral ischemic events and mortality, there were no statistically significant differences among the four types of sCAD (all P > .05). Favorable outcome was achieved in 168 patients (93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed a novel and more comprehensive classification method and the modern management strategy for sCAD. Antithrombotic therapy is beneficial to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke for stable sCAD. Non-emergent EVT can be an alternative therapeutic approach for patients who meet indications as in type II to IVA dissections. Urgent procedure with neurovascular intervention is necessary for some type IVB dissections. The short-term results of EVT for sCAD are encouraging, and long-term device-related and functional outcomes should undergo further research.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Adoption of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) by surgeons has been variable, with some still performing traditional carotid endarterectomy (CEA), whereas others have shifted to mostly TCAR. Our goal was to evaluate the association of relative surgeon volume of CEA to TCAR with perioperative outcomes. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative CEA and carotid artery stent registries were analyzed from 2021 to 2023 for symptomatic and asymptomatic interventions. Surgeons participating in both registries were categorized in the following CEA to CEA+TCAR volume percentage ratios: 0.25 (majority TCAR), 0.26 to 0.50 (more TCAR), 0.51 to 0.75 (more CEA), and 0.76 to 1.00 (majority CEA). Primary outcomes were rates of perioperative ipsilateral stroke, death, cranial nerve injury, and return to the operating room for bleeding. RESULTS: There were 50,189 patients who underwent primary carotid revascularization (64.3% CEA and 35.7% TCAR). CEA patients were younger (71.1 vs 73.5 years, P < .001), with more symptomatic cases, less coronary artery disease, diabetes, and lower antiplatelet and statin use (all P < .001). TCAR patients had lower rates of smoking, obesity, and dialysis or renal transplant (all P < .001). Postoperative stroke after CEA was significantly impacted by the operator CEA to TCAR volume ratio (P = .04), with surgeons who perform majority TCAR and more TCAR having higher postoperative ipsilateral stroke (majority TCAR odds ratio [OR]: 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-3.96, P = .01; more TCAR OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02-1.96, P = .04), as compared with those who perform majority CEA. Similarly, postoperative stroke after TCAR was significantly impacted by the CEA to TCAR volume ratio (P = .02), with surgeons who perform majority CEA and more CEA having higher stroke (majority CEA OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.00-2.27, P = .05; more CEA OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.14-2.00, P = .004), as compared with those who perform majority TCAR. There was no association between surgeon ratio and perioperative death, cranial nerve injury, and return to the operating room for bleeding for either procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The relative surgeon CEA to TCAR ratio is significantly associated with perioperative stroke rate. Surgeons who perform a majority of one procedure have a higher stroke rate in the other. Surgeons offering both operations should maintain a balanced practice and have a low threshold to collaborate as needed.