A randomized comparison between ultrasound-guided costoclavicular and infraclavicular block for upper extremity surgery

Background/aim: This study compared ultrasound guided costoclavicular (CC) and lateral sagittal infraclavicular (LS) brachial plexus block in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery. Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomly classified into two groups: Group CC (costoclavicular (n = 40)) and Group LS (lateral sagittal infraclavicular (n = 40)). Both groups received a 25 mL containing a mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine. A blinded observer recorded the block onset time and decided which patients who were admitted to the operation room needed general anesthesia or rescue block or without any iv. narcotics for the surgical procedure. Results: The sensorimotor onset time was found to be faster in the CC group [(15.95 2.97) min] compared to the LS group [(17.72 4.15) min]. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of sensorimotor onset time (p = 0.031). There was no difference between two groups in terms of the block performance times and post-block motor block dissolution times. Conclusion: The CC approach provides faster onset of sensorimotor blockade than LS approach when the 4 major terminal nerves of the brachial plexus were evaluated.

Comparison of the classical approach and costoclavicular approach of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and Aims: The infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB) provides analgesia and anaesthesia of the upper limb. It is given using the classical or the more recently described costoclavicular (CC) approach at the level of cords. This systematic review aimed to assess which approach is better for the ICB in terms of onset, performance, and safety. Methods: This PROSPERO (vide registration number CRD42022361636) registered meta-analysis included randomised trials of patients undergoing upper limb surgery in ultrasound-guided ICB from MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and IRCTP from inception to March 2023. The quality of evidence was assessed using GradePro software. The primary outcomes were sensory and motor block onset time and the number of patients having complete block at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included block performance time (BPT), number of attempts, duration of the block, and any incidence of complications. Results: Five trials with 374 adult patients (classic = 185, CC = 189) were included. No significant difference was found in the sensory (Mean difference (MD): 1.44 minutes [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.06, 5.95]; I2 = 95%; very low level of evidence (LOE); P = 0.53) and motor block onset times (MD: 0.83 minutes [95% CI: 0.96, 2.62]; I2 = 84%; very low LOE P = 0.36) and BPT (MD: 5.06 seconds [95% CI: 38.50, 48.63]; I2 = 98%; very low LOE; P = 0.82) in classic and CC approach of ICB. Trial sequential analysis revealed our sample size to be 0.65% of the required sample size to achieve 80% power, deeming our study underpowered. Conclusion: Costoclavicular approach was not superior or inferior to the classical technique for infraclavicular brachial plexus block. However, the quality of evidence is low and further studies are needed to corroborate the findings.

A Comparison of Anesthetic Quality between Single and Septum-based Double Injection for Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: In a costoclavicular (CC) approach of an ultrasound (US)-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB), a septum between the lateral and the medial/posterior cords can result in an incomplete block. We hypothesized that double injections in each compartment between the septum would result in a higher success rate of BPB than a single injection in the center of the CC space. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to confirm the superiority of block quality achieved by septum-based double injections (experimental group; group E) over single injection in the center of the CC space (control group; group C). STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trialSETTING: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients who underwent upper extremity surgery randomly received a single (SI group, n = 34) or a septum-based double injection (DI group, n = 34) using the CC approach. Ten milliliters of 2% lidocaine, 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, and 5 mL of normal saline were used for BPB in each group (total 25 mL). Sensory-motor blockade of the ipsilateral median, radial, ulnar, and musculocutaneous nerves was assessed by a blinded observer at 5-minute intervals for 30 minutes immediately after local anesthesia administration. The assessed variables were the success rate, the rate of all 4 nerves blockade, and onset time. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after the block, the success rate was significantly higher in the DI group than in the SI group (64.7% in the SI group vs 91.2% in the DI group, P = 0.009), and the rate of all 4 nerves blockade also significantly increased in the DI group compared to the SI group (44.1% in the SI group vs 91.2% in the DI group, P = 0). The onset time was significantly shortened in the DI group compared with the SI group (26.3 ± 5.6 min in the SI group vs 21.3 ± 6.2 min in the DI group, P = 0.010). LIMITATIONS: We considered that the location of the septum was always between the lateral cord superficially and the medial/posterior cords below it. In some patients in whom the septum was not visible, a superficial lateral cord was injected first, and then deep medial and posterior cords were injected, assuming that the 2 compartments were divided by the septum. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the SI, the septum-based DI of CC approach increased the success rate and the rate of all 4 nerves blockade and shortened the onset time.

Influencia de posición del brazo en adultos para abordaje de plexo braquial costoclavicular: estudio observacional / Influence of arm position in costoclavicular approach for brachial plexus block in adult patient: observational study

Resumen: Introducción: el bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular, ofrece ventajas como sitio de inyección único, sitio adecuado para colocación de catéter de analgesia continua. Objetivo: identificar la visibilidad de los tres cordones del plexo braquial en el espacio costoclavicular según la angulación del brazo. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo y transversal; se incluyeron 99 pacientes entre 18 a 90 años de edad, en un período de dos meses. Se describieron variables continuas, se aplicó la prueba no paramétrica de Friedman para K muestras relacionadas, una regresión lineal para confirmar la correlación entre la distancia de la piel a plexo braquial, peso e índice de masa corporal (IMC). Resultados: se encontró una menor profundidad en relación piel plexo bajo abducción del brazo a una angulación de 90o y 110o, que permite la visualización sonoanatómica del plexo braquial a nivel costoclavicular con significancia estadística. El peso es un factor independiente que determina la distancia entre la profundidad piel plexo. Conclusiones: se determinó que el abordaje del bloqueo costoclavicular ecoguiado es anatómicamente factible con elevada eficacia clínica, el cual concluye ser un sitio anatómico innovador y seguro.

Abstract: Introduction: the brachial plexus block with a costoclavicular approach offers advantages as a single injection site, being a suitable site for continuous analgesia catheter placement. Objective: to identify the visibility of the 3 brachial plexus cords in the costoclavicular space according to the angulation of the arm. Material and methods: a descriptive and cross-sectional observational study was carried out; 99 healthy patients between 18 and 90 years of age were included, in a period of two months. Continuous variables were described, the nonparametric Friedman test was applied for K related samples, a linear regression was performed to confirm the correlation between the distance from the skin to the brachial plexus, weight and body mass index (BMI). Results: a smaller depth was found in relation to the skin plexus under abduction of the arm at an angulation of 90o and 110o, which allows an adequate sonoanatomical visualization of the brachial plexus at the costoclavicular level with statistical significance. Weight is an independent factor that determine the distance between the skin plexus depth. Conclusions: it was determined that the ultrasound-guided costoclavicular block approach is anatomically feasible with greater clinical efficacy, which concludes to be an innovative and safe anatomical site.

Efectividad del bloqueo de plexo braquial con abordaje costoclavicular y factores que modifican la sonoanatomía en pacientes pediátricos / Effectiveness of brachial plexus block with costoclavicular approach and factors modifying sonoanatomy in pediatric patients

Resumen: El bloqueo de plexo braquial en pediatría se ha posicionado como una buena alternativa para procedimientos quirúrgicos de la extremidad superior, en especial a partir del advenimiento de la ultrasonografía. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del bloqueo con el abordaje costoclavicular en la población pediátrica, comparar la sonoanatomía de la ventana costoclavicular con la coracoidea y determinar si la posición del brazo impacta en la imagen ultrasonográfica. Se evaluaron un total de ocho pacientes con fracturas de miembro superior. De los ocho pacientes, cinco eran de género masculino (62.5%), tres de género femenino (37.5%) con una edad promedio de 8.8 años. Se realizó rastreo ultrasonográfico comparando la sonoanatomía del abordaje costoclavicular y coracoideos, observando mejor los cordones del plexo braquial y estructuras vasculares con el abordaje costoclavicular. Con el brazo en abducción 90 y 110o se optimizó la visualización de las estructuras neurovasculares y mejoría en la calidad del bloqueo. La dosis de ropivacaína fue de 1.5 mg/kg entre el 0.3-0.5%, con un tiempo de bloqueo motor promedio de 6.4 horas, y bloqueo sensitivo promedio de 11 horas. No se presentaron complicaciones. En conclusión, el bloqueo de plexo braquial por vía costoclavicular en la población pediátrica es una técnica segura.

Abstract: Pediatric brachial plexus block has become a good alternative for upper extremity surgical procedures, especially since the advent of ultrasonography. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the blockade with the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population, and compare the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular window with the coracoid one, and determinate if the position of the arm has an impact on the ultrasound image. A total of eight patients with upper limb fractures were evaluated. Of the eight patients, five were male (62.5%), three female (37.5%) with a mean age of 8.8 years. Ultrasonographic screening was performed comparing the sonoanatomy of the costoclavicular and coracoid approaches, better observing the brachial plexus cords and vascular structures with the costoclavicular approach. With the arm abducted 90 and 110o, a better visualization of the neurovascular structures and an improvement in the quality of the block was obtained. The ropivacaine dose was 1.5 mg/kg between 0.3-0.5%, with an average motor block time of 6.7 hours, and an average sensory block of 11.25 hours. There were not complications. In conclusion, the brachial plexus block via the costoclavicular approach in the pediatric population is a safe technique.