Decreasing Postsurgical Length of Stay in the Postanesthesia Care Unit for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Obese Patients Using Exspiron Minute Ventilation Monitoring.

PURPOSE: In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), it is imperative to monitor respiration and ventilation, especially in patients diagnosed with or at risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Research studies have been published to highlight the importance of minute ventilation monitoring (MVM) as an early warning system of impending respiratory compromise, warranting studies to assess timely safe discharge in this high-risk population at UC San Diego Health. DESIGN: This quantitative study was conducted using a two-group comparative design method. METHODS: Length of stay was measured in 100 patients identified as high risk in the surgical setting with diagnosed or suspected OSA or a documented body mass index ≥40 with and without the use of MVM to evaluate its impact on PACU length of stay. Fifty patients were monitored using the University of California San Diego (USCD) Health standard of care monitoring of respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, and capnography when indicated, then compared to 50 patients monitored with the UCSD Health standard of care with the addition of MVM using the Exspiron monitoring device. FINDINGS: PACU length of stay decreased for those who received MVM (M = 106.22, SD = 56.85) than those who did not (M = 140.96, SD = 81.55), a statistically significant difference of 34.74 (95% CI, 6.64 to 62.83), t(97) = 2.46, P = .016. Total time savings between the 2 groups was 1,843 minutes of PACU bed occupancy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of minute ventilation monitoring in addition to the standard of care in postsurgical patients can significantly reduce the length of high-risk patients with known or suspected OSA safely from the postoperative care unit.

Using Clinical-based Discharge Criteria to Discharge Patients After Endoscopy Procedures Under Drug-induced Intravenous Sedation in the Outpatient Care Unit: An Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To verify the feasibility of clinical-based discharge (CBD) criteria and to find out the reasons for the delayed discharge of outpatients after endoscopy procedures under drug-induced intravenous sedation. DESIGN: A prospectively observational study conducted at a tertiary endoscopy center. METHODS: Medical records were collected from outpatients admitted for endoscopy procedures under drug-induced intravenous sedation from June 1, 2021 to December 30, 2021. Patients were scheduled to discharge at least 30 minutes based on the time-based discharge (TBD) method. Postanesthetic discharge scoring system in the outpatient post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) recorded the time of patients discharged home on the CBD criteria. Postoperative complications were recorded in the PACU and within 24 hours after discharge. Multivariate analysis was applied to identify the factors relating to late discharges. FINDINGS: 10,597 patients were safely and successfully discharged home, and we were informed of no serious emergency or accidental readmissions to the hospital. The mean CBD time (21.77 ± 11.35 minutes) was compared with the TBD time (30 minutes) and actual TBD discharge time (61.56 ± 4.93 minutes), which were statistically significant, without changes in the patient's vital signs (P < .01). Primarily, further univariate and multivariate analyses showed that abdominal pain and fatigue were key factors accountable for delay in PACU discharge (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The study concluded that in patients undergoing ambulatory endoscopy procedures with drug-induced intravenous sedation, discharge times based on physiological scoring systems can efficiently and safely guide ambulatory patient discharge as compared to the traditional TBD method. Postoperative fatigue and pain were the main factors affecting patients discharge associated with a relatively long PACU length of stay.

Duration of monitoring after cessation of oxygen therapy in infants with bronchiolitis.

AIM: There is no evidence for how long bronchiolitis patients should be observed after coming off oxygen therapy and wide practice variation exists. We aimed to investigate whether it is safe to discharge bronchiolitis patients 4 h after cessation of oxygen therapy. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre cohort study of 884 infants (n = 462 in 2018 vs. n = 422 in 2019) aged 0-24 months admitted with bronchiolitis in 2018 and 2019 was conducted after implementation of a bronchiolitis protocol recommending discharge home 4 h post-cessation of oxygen therapy in 2019. We compared the rate of readmissions and Clinical Reviews/Rapid Responses in the pre- and post-exposure cohorts. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in median (interquartile range (IQR)) time to discharge post oxygen cessation by 87 min (510 (370-1033) min versus 423 (273-904) min; P < 0.001) and in median (IQR) length of stay by 6.7 h (2.11 (1.54-2.97) days vs. 1.83 (1.17-2.71) days; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between readmissions in 2018 compared to 2019 (0.6% vs. 1.4%; P = 0.317). In 2018, there were two Clinical Reviews and in 2019 there were two Rapid Responses post-cessation of oxygen. There were 89 patients discharged within 4 h of cessation of oxygen therapy (n = 18 in 2018 vs. n = 71 in 2019; P < 0.001) with no readmissions, Clinical Reviews or Rapid Responses in the 2019 cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients can be discharged 4 h after cessation of supplemental oxygen without increased risk of adverse events.

Simultaneous bilateral TKA in the context of fast track surgery - Do patients meet discharge criteria as anticipated?

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been generally proven. Previous studies investigating patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA (SBTKA) focused on complications, mortality, and pain and did not examine patients' functional limitations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patients undergoing SBTKA are able to meet functional discharge criteria originally designed for their counterparts undergoing unilateral TKA (UTKA) in an ERAS setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who received primary SBTKA between June 2015 and December 2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. For comparison, UTKA patients were matched 1:1 to SBTKA patients using Propensity Score Matching based on age, gender, and BMI. The times to achieving the rehabilitation checkpoints of walking 150 m, walking a flight of stairs, and 90° knee flexion were evaluated. RESULTS: 63 (SBTKA group) and 64 (UTKA group) patients were included. Due to the Propensity-Score-Matching there were no differences regarding age, gender, and BMI. The mean length of stay (LOS) was 9.1 days in the SBTKA and 7.6 days in the UTKA group (p = 0.003). On average, it took SBTKA patients 5.4 days to achieve an uninterrupted walking distance of at least 150 m, while it took UTKA patients 4.1 days (p < 0.001). Mean time to walking a flight of stairs was 6.3 days for SBTKA patients and 4.7 days for UTKA patients (p < 0.001). 90° flexion was achieved after 4.1 days by SBTKA patients and 3.5 days by UTKA patients (p = 0.241). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of SBTKA patients were able to achieve functional discharge criteria within their inpatient stay when allowed about 30% extra time. Therefore, functional discharge criteria in ERAS protocols designed for UTKA can be considered appropriate for SBTKA patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

When is it safe for the liver donor to be discharged home and prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations? - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on discharge criteria after living liver donation (LLD). OBJECTIVES: To identify the features for fit for discharge checklist after LLD to prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations and to provide international expert recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. The critical outcomes included were complications rates and liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR) (CRD42021260725). RESULTS: Total 57/1710 studies were included in qualitative analysis and 28/57 on the final analysis. No randomized controlled trials were identified. The complications rate was reported in 20/28 studies and ranged from 7.8% to 71.2%. Post hepatectomy liver function was reported in 13 studies. The Quality of Evidence (QoE) was Low and Very-Low for complications rate and liver function test, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring and prevention of donor complications should be crucial in decision making of discharge. Pain and diet control, removal of all drains and catheters, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and use routine imaging (CT scan or liver ultrasound) before discharge should be included as fit for discharge checklist (QoE; Low | GRADE of recommendation; Strong). Transient Impaired liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR), a prognostic marker of outcome after liver resection, usually occurs after donor right hepatectomy and should be monitored. Improving trends for bilirubin and INR value should be observed by day 5 post hepatectomy and be included in the fit for discharge checklist. (QoE; Very-Low | GRADE; Strong).

Comparison of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric chloroprocaine and general anaesthesia for short duration ambulatory urological procedures.

Background and Aims: Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic agent for spinal anaesthesia (SA) that has been used in day care surgeries due to its faster recovery characteristics and faster discharge rates compared to other local anaesthetics. This study aimed at finding out its efficacy for the same as compared to general anaesthesia (GA). Material and Methods: This observational study was conducted on 60 patients belonging to the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II who underwent short elective urological procedures (<60 min) under GA (group GA) as per standard of care in our hospital (n = 30) and SA (group SA) with 50 mg 1% isobaric 2-Chloroprocaine (n = 30). Time taken to meet the discharge criteria, modified Aldrete score and modified post anaesthesia discharge score in each group were noted. The cost of the anaesthetic procedure, anaesthetic procedural time, hemodynamics, supplemental analgesia, complications related to the procedure were noted and compared. Results: Patient characteristics and duration of surgery were comparable. Time taken by group SA was significantly higher than group GA to meet the discharge criteria. Cost of GA [2624.76 (166.16) units] was significantly more than SA [1561.63 (81.32) units, P < 0.05]. There was no requirement of supplemental analgesia in group SA and no hemodynamic instability or complications in either group. Conclusion: GA is significantly better as compared to SA with 50 mg 1% isobaric 2-Chloroprocaine as an anesthetic technique in day care urology surgeries in terms of faster recovery and faster discharge rate but is costlier.

Optimizing discharge decision-making in colorectal surgery: a prospective cohort study of discharge practices in a recently implemented enhanced recovery pathway.

AIM: The objectives of this project were (1) to compare time to readiness for discharge by set criteria and actual length of stay (LOS) in a newly implemented colorectal enhanced recovery pathway and (2) to identify reasons for delayed hospital discharge. METHOD: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 73 adult patients (age 67 ± 14 years, 56% men, 51% laparoscopic, 13% stoma creation) undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a university hospital with a recently implemented recovery pathway (<2 years). Time to readiness for discharge (oral intake, flatus, pain control, ability to walk, and no complications) was compared to actual LOS using a correlation-adjusted log-rank test. The treating team was interviewed, and thematic analysis was used to identify reasons for patients remaining in hospital after discharge criteria (DC) were achieved. RESULTS: Median LOS was 6 (4-8) days and median time to readiness for discharge was 5 (3-8) days (P < 0.001). Twenty-eight patients (37%) remained in hospital after DC were achieved. Although some delayed discharges were medically justified (e.g., workup [13%] or treatment of complications not captured by DC [2.6%]), unnecessary hospital stays were common (e.g., perceived need for observation [16%], or patients not willing to be discharged [11%]). CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary hospital stays were common within a recently implemented enhanced recovery pathway and represent a target for quality improvement. Efforts should be directed at optimizing patient education regarding discharge expectations, early consultation of the discharge planning team and improving discharge decision-making using standardized DC.

Fit-for-Discharge Criteria after Esophagectomy: An International Expert Delphi Consensus.

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission.

Necessity for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in multiple types of specimens for the discharge of the patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected positive again after discharged from hospital in some COVID-19 patients, with or without clinical symptoms such as fever or dry cough. METHODS: 1008 severe COVID-19 patients, with SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive detected with the mixed specimen of nasopharyngeal swab and oropharyngeal swab by real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), were selected to monitor SARS-CoV-2 RNA with the 12 types of specimens by RT-qPCR during hospitalization. All of 20 discharged cases with COVID-19 were selected to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in isolation period with 7 types of specimens by RT-qPCR before releasing the isolation period. RESULTS: Of the enrolled 1008 severe patients, the nasopharyngeal swab specimens showed the highest positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA (71.06%), followed by alveolar lavage fluid (66.67%), oropharyngeal swab (30.77%), sputum (28.53%), urine (16.30%), blood (12.5%), stool (12.21%), anal swab (11.22%) and corneal secretion (2.99%), and SARS-CoV-2 RNA couldn't be detected in other types of specimen in this study. Of the 20 discharged cases during the isolation period, the positive rate of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was 30% (6/20): 2 cases were positive in sputum at the eighth and ninth day after discharge, respectively, 1 case was positive in nasopharynx swab at the sixth day after discharge, 1 case was positive in anal swab at the eighth day after discharge, and 1 case was positive in 3 specimens (nasopharynx swab, oropharynx swab and sputum) simultaneously at the fourth day after discharge, and no positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in other specimens including stool, urine and blood at the discharged patients. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 RNA should be detected in multiple specimens, such as nasopharynx swab, oropharynx swab, sputum, and if necessary, stool and anal swab specimens should be performed simultaneously at discharge when the patients were considered for clinical cure and before releasing the isolation period.

Positive result of Sars-Cov-2 in faeces and sputum from discharged patients with COVID-19 in Yiwu, China.

BACKGROUND: With the effective prevention and control of COVID-19 in China, the number of cured cases has increased significantly. Further monitoring of the disease prognosis and effective control of the "relapse" of the epidemic has become the next focus of work. This study analysed the clinical prognosis of discharged COVID-19 patients by monitoring their SAR-CoV-2 nucleic acid status, which provided a theoretical basis for medical institutions to formulate discharge standards and follow-up management for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: We included 13 discharged COVID-19 patients who were quarantined for 4 weeks at home. The patient's daily clinical signs were recorded and sputum and faecal specimens were regularly sent for detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. RESULTS: The time between initial symptoms and meeting discharge criteria was 18 to 44 days with an average of 25 ± 6 days. The faecal samples of two patients still tested positive after meeting the discharge criteria and the sputum samples of four patients returned positive 5 to 14 days after discharge. The rate of the recurring positive test result in samples from the respiratory system was 31% (4/13). CONCLUSION: Under the present discharge criteria, the high presence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in faecal and respiratory samples of discharged COVID-19 patients indicates potential infectivity. Therefore, we suggest that faecal virus nucleic acid should be tested as a routine monitoring index for COVID-19 and a negative result be added to the criteria. Simultaneously, we should strengthen the regular follow-up of discharged patients with continuous monitoring of the recurrence of viral nucleic acid.

Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition (DPART): A Measurement Tool.

PURPOSE: To develop a valid reliable measurement tool that accurately quantifies postanesthesia recuperation in adult and pediatric patients. DESIGN: A descriptive factor-isolating design guided by measurement theory. METHODS: Instrument development was based on collaborative discussions of professional evidence. A five-person expert panel was consulted for content and face validity. Reliability testing took place in the adult and pediatric postanesthesia care units. FINDINGS: The expert panel's final review yielded a kappa statistic of 1 and scale content validity index based on universal agreement between raters of 1, suggesting high content validity. Reliability testing yielded a kappa statistic of 1, demonstrating complete agreement for all items. CONCLUSIONS: The Discerning Post Anesthesia Readiness for Transition measurement tool is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used in practice or future research to assess postanesthesia recuperation in pediatric and adult patients.

Using Clinical-Based Discharge Criteria to Discharge Patients After Ophthalmic Ambulatory Surgery Under General Anesthesia: An Observational Study.

PURPOSE: To verify the feasibility of the clinical-based discharge (CBD) criteria and identify the reasons of long postanesthesia care unit length of stay (PACU-LOS) for ophthalmic ambulatory surgical patients under general anesthesia. DESIGN: A prospectively observational study conducted at a tertiary eye center in China. METHODS: Medical records were collected from patients admitted for strabismus ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia from September 2018 to March 2019. The patients were discharged home once met the CBD criteria based on a combination of the modified Aldrete's scoring system and Chung's Post-Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System. Postoperative complications were recorded in the PACU and within 24 hours after discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify the factors relating to late discharges. FINDINGS: All patients (N = 400) were safely and successfully same-day discharged home as none of the patients informed severe emergency events or unanticipated readmission. Nine displayed discharge delays mainly because of mild postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) although met the discharge criteria. About 85.5% of patients were discharged within a PACU-LOS of 150 minutes, 379 (94.8%) were within 180 minutes, and the cutoff time in PACU-LOS was 150 minutes. Multivariable analysis indicated that sevoflurane anesthesia and the presence of PONV were related to late discharges (PACU-LOS of greater than 150 minutes, all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The CBD criteria can efficiently and safely guide the ophthalmic ambulatory surgical patients to discharge home on the same-surgery day, whereas sevoflurane anesthesia and the presence of PONV are associated with a relatively long PACU-LOS.

Patients Discharged From the Intensive Care Unit on a Dopamine Infusion-A Retrospective, Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of discharging cardiac surgical patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to wards while the patients are still receiving a dopamine infusion. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. SETTING: Cardiothoracic ICU of a tertiary academic hospital in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised all cardiac surgical patients older than 18 years and admitted between September 1, 2015 and September 16, 2016 to the ICU and subsequently discharged to a surgical ward. Patients were divided in the following 2 groups: a dopamine group with patients discharged with a dopamine infusion and a control group with patients discharged without any dopamine infusion. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The hospital mortality rate was comparable in both groups (0.7% in the dopamine group v 0.2% in the control group [p = 0.11]), despite that the median logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher in the dopamine group (7.0 v 3.8 [p < 0.01]). The ICU readmission rate was higher in the dopamine group (6.6% v 2.4%; p < 0.01). ICU and hospital lengths of stay were longer in the dopamine group (1.7 v 0.9 days [p < 0.01] and 11.4 v 8.0 days [p < 0.01], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher ICU readmission rate, ICU discharge of patients on dopamine infusion was not associated with increased mortality.

Development and validation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) induced angioedema investigator rating scale and proposed discharge criteria.

BACKGROUND: The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) has been associated with the development of bradykinin-mediated angioedema. With ever-widening indications for ACEI in diseases including hypertension, congestive heart failure and diabetic nephropathy, a concomitant increase in ACEI-Angioedema (ACEI-A) has been reported. At present there is no validated severity scoring or discharge criteria for ACEI-A. We sought to develop and validate an investigator rating scale with corresponding discharge criteria using clinicians experienced in treating ACEI-A. METHODS: In-depth, 60-min qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 12 US-based emergency physicians. Beforehand, clinicians were sent four case studies describing patients experiencing different severities of angioedema attacks. Clinicians were initially asked open-ended questions about their experience of patients' symptoms, treatment and discharge decisions. Clinicians then rated each patient case study and discussed patient diagnoses, ratings of symptom severity and discharge evaluation. The ratings were used to assess inter-rater reliability of the scale using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using IBM SPSS analysis Version 19 software. RESULTS: The findings provide support focusing on four key symptoms of airway compromise scored on a 0-4 scale: 1) Difficulty Breathing, 2) Difficulty Swallowing, 3) Voice Changes and 4) Tongue Swelling and the corresponding discharge criteria of a score of 0 or 'No symptoms' for Difficulty Breathing and Difficulty Swallowing and a score of 0 or 1 indicating mild or absence of symptoms for Voice Change and Tongue Swelling. Eleven clinicians agreed the absence of standardized discharge criteria supported the use of this scale. All physicians concurred with the recommended discharge criteria. The clinician ratings provided evidence of strong inter-rater reliability for the rating scale (ICC > 0.80). CONCLUSION: The investigator rating scale and discharge criteria are clinically valid, relevant and reliable. Moreover, both address the current unmet need for standardized ED discharge criteria.

Postanesthesia Scoring Methods: An Integrative Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Internationally there is no consensus on the indicators essential for determining safe recovery from anesthesia and patient readiness for discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). DESIGN: Integrative review. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) as a search strategy, the literature related to PACU discharge scores were evaluated and organized into themes. FINDINGS: The traditional components of airway support, oxygenation, sedation, and circulation are common within many first stage PACU discharge scores. However, there is strong support from the literature for components such as heart rate, temperature, pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), urine output, and surgical site assessment to also be included. The review revealed that there is no standardized time frequency in applying a first stage PACU discharge score to patients within the PACU environment. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for the development and trial of an evidence based first stage PACU discharge score.

Evaluation of the pediatric post anesthesia discharge scoring system in an ambulatory surgery unit.

INTRODUCTION: To optimize the care pathway for children scheduled for ambulatory surgery, a pediatric postanesthetic discharge scoring system (Ped-PADSS) was developed from a score used in adults. The objective of this study was to evaluate this score prospectively on a cohort of children who had a day case surgical procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single center prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria were predefined as follows: children aged 6 months-16 years at the time of the study, with a scheduled day surgery. Discharge was validated by Ped-PADSS scores ≥9, obtained at one hour intervals, after the return from the operating room and with the agreement of the surgeon. The duration of postoperative hospitalization was compared with data collected before the implementation of the score using the Student's t-test. RESULTS: From February to July 2012, 1060 children were included. One hour after the return from the operating room, 97.2% of children were dischargeable using Ped-PADSS. Two hours after the return from the operating room, 99.8% of children were dischargeable. The median postoperative hospital stay (n = 1041) was reduced by 69 min compared to the median stay before using the output score (n = 150) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The Ped-PADSS score allows for the majority of children to be discharged 1 h after their return from the postanesthesia care unit. Children who were discharged using the Ped-PADSS score returned home in safe and optimal conditions.

Predicted implications of using percentage weight gain as single discharge criterion in management of acute malnutrition in rural southern Ethiopia.

Mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is increasingly used in identifying and admitting children with acute malnutrition for treatment. It is easy to use because it does not involve height assessment, but its use calls for alternative discharge criteria. This study examined how use of percentage weight gain as discharge criterion would affect the nutritional status of children admitted into a community-based management programme for acute malnutrition in rural southern Ethiopia. Non-oedematous children (n = 631) aged 6-59 months and having a MUAC of <125 mm were studied. By simulation, 10%, 15% and 20% weight was added to admission weight and their nutritional status by weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) was determined at each target. Moderate and severe wasting according to World Health Organization WHZ definitions was used as outcome. Applying the most commonly recommended target of 15% weight gain resulted in 9% of children with admission MUAC <115 mm still being moderately or severely wasted at theoretical discharge. In children with admission MUAC 115-124 mm, 10% of weight gain was sufficient to generate a similar result. Children failing to recover were the ones with the poorest nutritional status at admission. Increasing the percentage weight gain targets in the two groups to 20% and 15%, respectively, would largely resolve wasting but likely lead to increased programme costs by keeping already recovered children in the programme. Further research is needed on appropriate discharge procedures in programmes using MUAC for screening and admission.

Factors associated with discharge home in older patients admitted to emergency department observation units: Looking for a predictive scale.

BACKGROUND: The selection of patients who are going to be admitted to an emergency department observation unit (EDOU) is essential for the good management of these units, intended fundamentally to avoid unnecessary hospitalization of patients. This is especially important when dealing with older patients. It would be important to know what factors are associated with discharge home and to have a clinical predictive scale that appropriately selects older patients who are going to be admitted to an EDOU. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of all patients ≥65 years of age assisted in 48 Spanish Emergency Departments for 7 consecutive days and were admitted to the EDOU. Demographics-functional, vital signs data and initial laboratory results were analyzed to investigate its association with discharge home and develop and validate a prediction model for discharge home from EDOU. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to develop a prediction model, and a scoring system was created. RESULTS: Among 5457 patients admitted to the EDOU from the emergency room, 2508 (46%) patients were discharged home, and 2949 (54%) were admitted to the hospital. Five variables were strongly associated with discharge home: the absence of fever (adjusted OR: 3.61, 95% CI:1.53-8.54), Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 points (2.80, 1.63-4.82), absence of tachypnea (2.51, 1.74-3.64) or leukocytosis (2.07, 1.70-2.52) and oxygen saturation >94% (2.00, 1.64-2.43). The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.648 (IC95% = 0.627-0.668) in the development cohort and 0.635 (0.614-0.656) in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: There are factors associated with a greater probability of discharge home of older patients admitted to EDOUs. Prediction at the individual level remains elusive, as the best model obtained in this study did not have sufficient validity to be applied in the clinical setting.

Comparison of three scoring criteria to assess recovery from general anesthesia in the postanesthesia care unit in the indian population.

Background: Different discharge criteria are available for shifting patients out from postanesthesia care room following surgery. This study was done to compare the three-scoring system namely traditional time-based criteria, Fast track criteria and modified Aldrete score, in Indian population patients who recover after general anesthesia in postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Materials and Methods: Three hundred and seventy-five patients scheduled for general anesthesia were included in this study. Induction of anesthesia was done with intravenous (IV) propofol and maintained with sevoflurane inhalation with oxygen and nitrous oxide. Reversal of residual neuromuscular blockade was done with IV neostigmine and glycopyrrolate. Patients were shifted to PACU following tracheal extubation and recovery was assessed using the traditional time-based criteria, fast track criteria, and modified Aldrete score. Results: As per modified Aldrete score, mean time of shift out is 19 min with median of 15 min and standard deviation of 21.7 min. As per fast-track score, mean time of shift out is 187 min with median of 30 min and standard deviation of 243.7 min. As per the time-based criteria, mean time of shift out is 222 min with median of 240 min and standard deviation of 136.8 min. While using modified Aldrete score, majority of patients had a shorter stay in PACU and faster time to shift out as compared to fast-track criteria and traditional time-based criteria. Conclusion: Modified Aldrete score when compared to fast-track scoring and time-based criteria shows early recovery and reduces the length of stay in PACU.

Résumé Contexte: Différents critères de sortie sont disponibles pour faire sortir les patients de la salle de soins post-anesthésie après une intervention chirurgicale. Cette étude a été réalisée pour comparer le système de notation à trois, à savoir les critères traditionnels basés sur le temps, les critères accélérés et le score Aldrete modifié, en Inde. Population de patients qui se rétablissent après une anesthésie générale en unité de soins post-anesthésiques (USPA). Matériels et méthodes: Trois cent et soixante-quinze patients devant subir une anesthésie générale ont été inclus dans cette étude. L'induction de l'anesthésie a été réalisée par voie intraveineuse (IV) propofol et maintenu avec inhalation de sévoflurane avec de l'oxygène et du protoxyde d'azote. L'inversion du bloc neuromusculaire résiduel a été réalisée avec néostigmine IV et glycopyrrolate. Les patients ont été transférés vers une USPA après l'extubation trachéale et la récupération a été évaluée à l'aide du critères traditionnels basés sur le temps, critères accélérés et score d'Aldrete modifié. Résultats: Selon le score d'Aldrete modifié, temps moyen de sortie est de 19 min avec une médiane de 15 min et un écart type de 21,7 min. Selon le score accéléré, le temps moyen de sortie est de 187 minutes avec une médiane de 30 min et écart type de 243,7 min. Selon les critères temporels, le temps moyen de changement de poste est de 222 minutes avec une médiane de 240 minutes et écart type de 136,8 min. En utilisant le score d'Aldrete modifié, la majorité des patients ont eu un séjour plus court en USPA et un temps de changement plus rapide. Par rapport aux critères accélérés et aux critères traditionnels basés sur le temps. Conclusion: Score d'Aldrete modifié par rapport au traitement accéléré la notation et les critères basés sur le temps montrent une récupération précoce et réduisent la durée du séjour en USPA. Mots-clés: Critères accélérés, score d'Aldrete modifié, unité de soins post-anesthésie, critères de sortie post-anesthésie, sortie basée sur le temps.

The current state of intensive care unit discharge practices - Results of an international survey study.

Background: Increasing pressure on limited intensive care capacities often requires a subjective assessment of a patient's discharge readiness in the absence of established Admission, Discharge, and Transfer (ADT) guidelines. To avoid suboptimal care transitions, it is important to define clear guidelines for the admission and discharge of intensive care patients and to optimize transfer processes between the intensive care unit (ICU) and lower care levels. To achieve these goals, structured insights into usual ICU discharge and transfer practices are essential. This study aimed to generate these insights by focusing on involved stakeholders, established processes, discharge criteria and tools, relevant performance metrics, and current barriers to a timely and safe discharge. Method: In 2022, a structured, web-based, anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted, aimed at practicing ICU physicians, nurses, and bed coordinators. The survey consisted of 29 questions (open, closed, multiple choice, and scales) that were divided into thematic blocks. The study was supported by several national and international societies for intensive care medicine and nursing. Results: A total of 219 participants from 40 countries (105 from Germany) participated in the survey. An overload of acute care resources with ~90% capacity utilization in the ICU and the general ward (GW) leads to not only premature but also delayed patient transfers due to a lack of available ward and intermediate care (IMC) beds. After multidisciplinary rounds within the intensive care team, the ICU clinician on duty usually makes the final transfer decision, while one-third of the panel coordinates discharge decisions across departmental boundaries. By the end of the COVID-19 pandemic, half of the hospitals had implemented ADT policies. Among these hospitals, nearly one-third of the hospitals had specific transfer criteria established, consisting primarily of vital signs and laboratory data, patient status and autonomy, and organization-specific criteria. Liaison nurses were less common but were ranked right after the required IMC capacities to bridge the care gap between the ICU and normal wards. In this study, 80% of the participants suggested that transfer planning would be easier if there was good transparency regarding the capacity utilization of lower care levels, a standardized transfer process, and improved interdisciplinary communication. Conclusion: To improve care transitions, transfer processes should be managed proactively across departments, and efforts should be made to identify and address care gaps.