Pharmaceutical Management of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and the Role of Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) poses a common condition among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the chronic stimulation of the parathyroid glands as a result of persistently low calcium levels. As a first option for medical treatment, vitamin D receptor analogs (VDRAs) and calcimimetic agents are generally used. Apart from cinacalcet, which is orally taken, in recent years, another calcimimetic agent, etelcalcetide, is being administered intravenously during dialysis. Materials and Methods: In a 5-year retrospective study between 2018 and 2023, 52 patients undergoing dialysis were studied. The aim of this study is to highlight the possible effects and/or benefits that intravenously administered calcimimetic agents have on CKD patients. A total of 34 patients (65.4%) received cinacalcet and etelcalcetide while parathormone (PTH) and calcium serum levels were monitored on a monthly basis. Results: A total of 29 out of 33 patients (87.9%) that received treatment with etelcalcetide showed a significant decrease in PTH levels, which rose up to 57% compared to the initial values. None of the included patients needed to undergo parathyroidectomy (PTx) due to either extremely high and persistent PTH levels or severe side effects of the medications. It is generally strongly advised that parathyroidectomies should be performed by an expert surgical team. In recent years, a significant decrease in parathyroidectomies has been recorded globally, a fact that is mainly linked to the constantly wider use of new calcimimetic agents. This decrease in parathyroidectomies has resulted in an important decrease in complications occurring in cervical surgeries (e.g., perioperative hemorrhage and nerve damage). Conslusions: Despite the fact that these surgical complications cannot be easily compared to the pharmaceutical side effects, the recorded decrease in parathyroidectomies is considered to be notable, especially in cases of relapse where a difficult reoperation would be considered based on previously published guidelines.

Effect of etelcalcetide versus alfacalcidol on left ventricular function and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in hemodialysis-a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Calcimimetic therapy with etelcalcetide (ETEL) has been shown to attenuate the advancement of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in hemodialysis patients measured by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). The aim of the study was to evaluate whether this effect is accompanied by alterations in LV function and myocardial composition. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a randomized-controlled trial of ETEL versus Alfacalcidol (ALFA) in 62 hemodialysis patients. LV function was assessed using LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) on feature-tracking (FT) CMR. Myocardial tissue characteristics were analyzed using parametric T1 and T2 mapping. RESULTS: Of the total study cohort (n = 62), 48 subjects completed both CMR scans with sufficient quality for FT analysis. In the one-year follow-up, LV GLS deteriorated in the ALFA group, whereas the ETEL group remained stable (LV GLS change: + 2.6 ± 4.6 versus + 0.3 ± 3.8; p = 0.045 when adjusting for randomization factors and baseline LV GLS). We did not observe a difference in the change of LVEF between the two groups (p = 0.513). The impact of ETEL treatment on LV GLS over time remained significant after additional adjustment for the change in LV mass during the study period. ETEL treatment did not significantly affect other CMR parameters. There were no changes in myocardial composition between treatment groups (T1 time change: + 15 ± 42 versus + 10 ± 50; p = 0.411; T2 time change: - 0.13 ± 2.45 versus - 0.70 ± 2.43; p = 0.652). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing hemodialysis, treatment with ETEL was protective against deterioration of LV longitudinal function, as evaluated through FT CMR, when compared to the control therapy of ALFA. This effect was not mediated by the change in LV mass. Trial registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03182699 . Unique identifier: NCT03182699.

Impact of Cinacalcet and Etelcalcetide on Bone Mineral and Cardiovascular Disease in Dialysis Patients.

PURPOSES OF REVIEW: With chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and mineral and bone metabolism disease (MBD) almost inevitably develop and result in renal osteodystrophy and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Together with active vitamin D, calcimimetics are the main therapy for sHPT in CKD. This review provides an overview of the therapeutic effects of oral cinacalcet and intravenous etelcalcetide on CKD-MBD and vascular disease, with a focus on pediatric dialysis patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Randomized controlled trials in adults and children demonstrate efficient lowering of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by the calcimimetics together with a reduction in serum calcium and phosphate when combined with low-dose active vitamin D, while therapy with active vitamin D analogs alone increases serum calcium and phosphate. Cinacalcet and etelcalcetide both improve bone formation and correct adynamic bone, i.e., have a direct bone anabolic effect. They decrease serum calciprotein particles, which are involved in endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, and vascular calcification. Clinical trials in adults suggest a modest slowing of the progression of cardiovascular calcification with cinacalcet. Calcimimetic agents represent a major pharmacological tool for improved control of CKD-MBD, by efficiently counteracting sHPT and allowing for better control of calcium/phosphate and bone homeostasis. Albeit definite evidence is lacking, the beneficial effects of calcimimetics on CVD are promising. Routine use of cinacalcet has been suggested in children.

Activation of the Calcium Receptor by Calcimimetic Agents Is Preserved Despite Modest Attenuating Effects of Hyperphosphatemia.

BACKGROUND: Phosphorus levels in the range seen clinically among patients undergoing dialysis have been reported to attenuate calcium receptor activation and modify parathyroid hormone (PTH) release from isolated parathyroid glands in vitro. Some clinicians and providers of dialysis thus have suggested that calcimimetic agents are ineffective and should not be used to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism among those undergoing dialysis when serum phosphorus concentrations exceed certain threshold levels. METHODS: To determine whether hyperphosphatemia diminishes the therapeutic response to calcimimetic agents, we used data from large clinical trials to analyze the effects of etelcalcetide and cinacalcet to lower plasma PTH levels in individuals on hemodialysis who had secondary hyperparathyroidism and varying degrees of hyperphosphatemia. RESULTS: Plasma PTH levels declined progressively during 26 weeks of treatment with either etelcalcetide or cinacalcet without regard to the degree of hyperphosphatemia at baseline. However, with each calcimimetic agent, the decreases in PTH from baseline were less at each interval of follow-up during the trials among participants with serum phosphorus levels above one of three prespecified threshold values compared with those with serum phosphorus levels below these thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: These in vivo findings are the first in humans to support the idea that hyperphosphatemia attenuates calcium receptor activation by calcium ions and by calcimimetic agents. The effect of hyperphosphatemia on the responsiveness to calcimimetic agents appears relatively modest, however, and unlikely to be significant therapeutically. The efficacy of treatment with calcimimetic agents for lowering plasma PTH levels among those with secondary hyperparathyroidism remains robust despite substantial elevations in serum phosphorus.

Etelcalcetide Utilization, Dosing Titration, and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disease (CKD-MBD) Marker Responses in US Hemodialysis Patients.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Clinical trial data have demonstrated the efficacy of etelcalcetide for reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We provide a real-world summary of etelcalcetide utilization, dosing, effectiveness, and discontinuation since its US introduction in April 2017. STUDY DESIGN: New-user design within prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 2,596 new users of etelcalcetide from April 2017 through August 2019 in a national sample of adult maintenance HD patients in the US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). PREDICTORS: Baseline PTH, prior cinacalcet use, initial etelcalcetide dose. OUTCOME: Trajectories of etelcalcetide dose, chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disease (CKD-MBD) medications, and levels of PTH, serum calcium, and phosphorus in the 12 months after etelcalcetide initiation. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cumulative incidence methods for etelcalcetide discontinuation and linear generalized estimating equations for trajectory analyses. RESULTS: By August 2019, etelcalcetide prescriptions increased to 6% of HD patients from their first use in April 2017. Starting etelcalcetide dose was 15 mg/wk in 70% of patients and 7.5 mg/wk in 27% of patients; 49% of new users were prescribed cinacalcet in the prior 3 months. Etelcalcetide discontinuation was 9%, 17%, and 27% by 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation. One year after etelcalcetide initiation, mean PTH levels declined by 40%, from 948 to 566 pg/mL, and the proportion of patients with PTH within target (150-599 pg/mL) increased from 33% to 64% overall, from 0 to 60% among patients with baseline PTH ≥ 600 pg/mL, and from 30% to 63% among patients with prior cinacalcet use. The proportion of patients with serum phosphorus > 5.5 mg/dL decreased from 55% to 45%, while the prevalence of albumin-corrected serum calcium < 7.5 mg/dL remained at 1%-2%. There were increases in use of active vitamin D (from 77% to 87%) and calcium-based phosphate binders (from 41% to 50%) in the 12 months after etelcalcetide initiation. LIMITATIONS: Data are unavailable for provider dosing protocols, dose holds, or reasons for discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In the 12 months after etelcalcetide initiation, patients had large and sustained reductions in PTH levels. These results support the utility of etelcalcetide as an effective therapy to achieve the KDIGO-recommended guidelines for CKD-MBD markers in HD patients.

Impact of etelcalcetide on fibroblast growth factor-23 and calciprotein particles in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing haemodialysis.

AIM: Recently, we demonstrated the efficacy of etelcalcetide in the control of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate changes in fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF23) and calciprotein particles (CPPs) after treatment with calcimimetics. METHODS: The DUET trial was a 12-week multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized (1:1:1) study with patients treated with etelcalcetide plus active vitamin D (E + D group; n = 41), etelcalcetide plus oral calcium (E + Ca group; n = 41), or control (C group; n = 42) under maintenance haemodialysis. Serum levels of FGF23 and CPPs were measured at baseline, and 6 and 12 weeks after the start. RESULTS: In the linear mixed model, serum levels of FGF23 in etelcalcetide users were significantly lower than those in non-users at week 6 (p < .001) and week 12 (p < .001). When compared the difference between the E + Ca group and the E + D group, serum levels of FGF23 in the E + Ca group were significantly lower than those in the E + D group at week 12 (p = .017). There were no significant differences in the serum levels of CPPs between etelcalcetide users and non-users at week 6 and week 12, while CPPs in the E + Ca group were significantly lower than those in the E + D group (p < .001) at week 12. CONCLUSION: Etelcalcetide may be useful through suppression of FGF23 levels among haemodialysis patients with SHPT. When correcting hypocalcaemia, loading oral calcium preparations could be more advantageous than active vitamin D for the suppression of both FGF23 and CPPs.

Implementation of a Nurse-Led Etelcalcetide Protocol at the Outpatient Dialysis Unit: A Quality Improvement Project.

This quality improvement project was implemented to improve renal hyperparathyroidism in patients with end stage kidney disease who are on hemodialysis through the implementation of a nurse-led etelcalcetide protocol. Results showed that the post-intervention group had a 16.7% increase of the intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) range within the target goal compared to the 3-month pre-intervention assessment (95% CI; 20.3% to 48.1%). The odds of being in the PTH target range were 1.73 times higher after the 3-month intervention than measurements obtained before starting the intervention (95% CI for the odds ratio: 0.29 to 10.3). Despite the lack of statistical significance (p = 0.688) due to a small sample size, there was an improvement in reaching goal PTH levels. Further studies are needed to analyze the effectiveness of nurse-led protocols in treating renal hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients.

Current therapeutic options for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease patients treated with hemodialysis: a 12-month comparative study.

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a new calcimimetic, Etelcalcetide, on secondary hyperparathyroidism and its effects in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients not treated with calcimimetics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort study included 203 ESRD patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) who received HD treatment. Total number patients were randomly to two groups. The main group (n=71) included HD patients treated by new calcimimetic Etelcalcetide. The historical group (n=132) was evaluated retrospectively and included patients who had SHPT but did not receive calcimimetic treatment. Serum levels of phosphorus, calcium and parathyroid hormone were compared for 12 months. The primary endpoint of the study was death from any cause, surrogates - cases of fractures, parathyroidectomy, death from cardiovascular (CV) events. RESULTS: The dose of Etelcalcetide changed monthly and averaged 8.58±1.79 mg. The dynamics of parathormone (PTH) indicators showed that the decrease in PTH levels by 30% from basal occurred after 3 months of treatment in 39 (54.9%) and 12 (9.1%) patients of the main group and historical group, respectively (p<0.0001). At the end of the study, the target PTH level reached in 52 (73.2%) patients in the main group and only 14 (10.6%) in the comparison group (p<0.0001). In addition to the decrease in serum PTH content, in the main group of patients, there was also a decrease in serum calcium and phosphorus levels. During the time to be analyzed, 36 deaths were reported, 61.1% of which were fatal CV events. The proportion of CV events in the mortality structure is more than 70% higher in the historical group than in the group of patients treated with Etelcalcetide, and is 69,2% vs 40,0%, respectively. The frequency of fractures is almost three times higher in the historical than in the main group of patients. The proportion of patients who required parathyroidectomy was significantly more than three times higher in the historical group than in the main group (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we demonstrated the high efficacy of Etelcalcetide in the treatment of SHPT in hemodialysis patients. Treatment of SHPT with the inclusion of Etelcalcetide is accompanied by improved clinical outcomes such as the incidence of bone fractures, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Etelcalcetide decreases the PTH-calcium setpoint without changing maximum and minimum PTH secretion in mice with primary hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: Etelcalcetide binds to the extracellular domain of the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), while cinacalcet binds to the 7-transmembrane domain of the CaSR; however, it is unknown, whether etelcalcetide has similar effects to cinacalcet on parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PTH-calcium setpoint and maximum and minimum PTH secretion were determined using an 'in vivo setpoint analyses.' The PTH-calcium setpoint was obtained in a mouse model of primary hyperparathyroidism (PC) and wild-type (WT) mice, with PC mice divided into two groups. The setpoint was obtained after 7 days of etelcalcetide (3.0 mg/kg BW/day) or vehicle administration via anosmotic pump. After 7 days of crossover administration, the setpoint was obtained again. Parathyroid glands were obtained after crossover administration, and CaSR expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Etelcalcetide administration significantly decreased the setpoint from 9.03 ± 0.56 mg/dL to 6.80 ± 0.28 mg/dL, which was restored to 8.81 ± 0.38 mg/dL after vehicle administration. In the second group of mice, vehicle administration did not alter the setpoint (8.84 ± 0.69 mg/dL to 8.98 ± 0.63 mg/dL), but subsequent etelcalcetide administration significantly decreased it to 7.10 ± 0.72 mg/dL. There was no significant change in maximum and minimum PTH secretion. Expression levels of parathyroid CaSR were lower in PC mice than in WT mice; however, no significant differences were observed between the two mouse groups. CONCLUSION: Etelcalcetide decreased the PTH-calcium setpoint without changing maximum and minimum PTH secretion in PC mice, suggesting that like cinacalcet, etelcalcetide has calcimimetic potency.

Phase 1, single-dose study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of etelcalcetide in pediatric patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on the safety, efficacy of etelcalcetide in children with secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) are limited. METHODS: This phase 1 study (NCT02833857) evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) of single-dose etelcalcetide (0.035 mg/kg intravenously) in pediatric hemodialysis patients (two cohorts; 1: 12-< 18 years; 2: 2-< 12 years). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), PK/PD were assessed post-dose on D1 at 10 min and 4 h, on multiple days until D10, and at end of study (D30). RESULTS: Etelcalcetide administered to 11 patients (mean [SD] age 10.3 [4.3] years; cohort 1, n = 6; cohort 2, n = 5) was well tolerated. AEs were consistent with established safety profiles in adults. Two patients (1 per cohort) reported treatment-related AEs (cohort 1: hypocalcemia; cohort 2: headache, paresthesia, vomiting). No serious AEs or deaths were reported. Mean serum corrected calcium (cCa) for all patients was maintained > 2.25 mmol/L. After etelcalcetide dosing, PK exposures declined, with mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf exposures higher in cohort 1. Median percent change in serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) from baseline (cohort 1: 51.2 pmol/L; cohort 2: 84.0 pmol/L) reached the nadir on D1 at 4 h (cohort 1: - 33.4%; cohort 2: - 64.2%). Mean total calcium and cCa reached nadirs on D3 at 2.39 mmol/L, and ionized Ca on D1 at 4 h. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose etelcalcetide (0.035 mg/kg) was well tolerated with expected PK and safety profiles. Overall pattern of changes in serum iPTH and serum calcium was similar between cohorts and consistent with expected responses to etelcalcetide.

Safety and efficacy of etelcalcetide, an intravenous calcimimetic, for up to 52 weeks in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: results of a post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Etelcalcetide is a second-generation calcimimetic for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients on dialysis. We performed a post-marketing surveillance (PMS) to obtain information on the safety and efficacy of etelcalcetide in clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: This PMS enrolled SHPT patients who started initial treatment with etelcalcetide between April 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018 in Japan. Safety [adverse drug reactions (ADRs)] and efficacy [serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), corrected calcium (cCa), phosphorous (P), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP)] were recorded for up to 52 weeks or until treatment discontinuation. Treatment decisions were at the physician's discretion. RESULTS: Of 1226 patients enrolled across 282 centers, safety and efficacy data were available for 1195 and 1192, respectively, while 933 continued treatment to Week 52. The starting dose was 5 mg in 82.0% of patients. There were 218 ADRs in 169 patients (14.1%). Metabolism and nutrition disorders (8.8%), adverse laboratory test results (1.8%), and gastrointestinal disorders (1.6%) were the most frequent classes of ADRs. Hypocalcemia-related ADRs occurred in 104 patients (8.7%). The percentage of patients with iPTH levels within the target range (60-240 pg/mL) steadily increased from 19.5% at Week 0 to 64.1% at Week 52 or last dose. cCa, P, and ALP levels remained well controlled. CONCLUSION: This was the first real-world, large-scale, long-term observational PMS of etelcalcetide in Japan. We did not observe any new safety concerns. Etelcalcetide was associated with clinically relevant improvements in serum iPTH and maintenance of serum cCa, P, and ALP levels.

Comparative Effectiveness of Calcimimetic Agents for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Comparative benefits and harms of calcimimetic agents used for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism have not been well characterized. We sought to compare the effectiveness of 3 calcimimetic agents using published data. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis. SETTING & STUDY POPULATION: Adults with chronic kidney disease enrolled in a clinical trial of a calcimetic agent. SEARCH STRATEGY & SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL (from February 7, 2013, to November 21, 2019), and a published meta-analysis. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted the study data, assessed risk of bias, and rated evidence certainty using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary review outcomes were achievement of a target reduction in serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels and hypocalcemia. Additional outcomes were nausea, vomiting, serious adverse events, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and fracture. RESULTS: 36 trials (11,247 participants) were included. All except 4 trials involved dialysis patients. Median follow-up was 26 weeks (range, 1 week to 21.2 months). Compared with placebo, calcimimetic agents had higher odds of achieving target PTH levels with high or moderate certainty. Etelcalcetide had the highest odds of achieving a PTH target compared with evocalcet (OR, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.33-18.2) and cinacalcet (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.19-6.67). Etelcalcetide appeared to cause more hypocalcemia than cinacalcet and evocalcet. Cinacalcet and to a lesser extent etelcalcetide appeared to cause more nausea than placebo. Differences in risk for mortality, cardiovascular end points, or fractures across calcimimetic agents could not be discerned with sufficient certainty. LIMITATIONS: Lack of longer-term data; heterogeneous end point definitions. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of the benefits of calcimimetic therapy is limited to short-term assessment of a putative surrogate outcome (serum PTH). Although etelcalcetide was associated with the largest reduction in PTH levels, side-effect profiles differed across the 3 calcimimetic agents, making it not possible to identify 1 preferred agent.

One-year safety and efficacy of intravenous etelcalcetide in patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a common complication of chronic kidney disease, is characterized by elevated serum parathyroid hormone (PTH). Etelcalcetide is an intravenous calcimimetic that increases sensitivity of the calcium-sensing receptor to calcium and decreases PTH secretion. This open-label extension (OLE) trial evaluated the long-term effects of etelcalcetide for sHPT treatment in patients receiving hemodialysis. METHODS: This 52-week, multicenter, single-arm OLE enrolled patients from three parent trials: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and one open-label, single-arm, 'switch' study from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide. The primary endpoint was to investigate the nature, frequency, severity and relation to treatment of all adverse events (AEs) reported throughout the trial. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with >30% reduction from baseline in PTH and the percentage change from baseline in PTH, albumin-corrected calcium (Ca), phosphate (P) and the calcium-phosphate product (Ca × P).ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01785875; Amgen study: 20120231. RESULTS: Overall, 89.8% of the patients experienced one or more treatment-emergent AE. The most common were decreased blood Ca (43.3%), diarrhea (10.8%), vomiting (10.4%) and nausea (9.6%); symptomatic hypocalcemia occurred in 3.7% of the patients. Approximately 68% of patients achieved >30% reduction in PTH, and ∼56% achieved PTH ≤300 pg/mL. Mean percent changes from baseline ranged from -25.4% to -26.1% for PTH, -8.3% to -9.1% for Ca, -3.6% to -4.1% for P and -12.0% to -12.6% for Ca × P. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide effectively lowered PTH and its effect was sustained, while no new safety concerns emerged over a 1-year treatment period.

Influence of dialysate Ca concentrations on the therapeutic effects of etelcalcetide with concomitant drugs in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

AIM: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), a complication of haemodialysis, is commonly treated with calcimimetics. The impact of dialysates containing different calcium (Ca) concentrations on clinical efficacy of calcimimetics are unclear. We examined whether dialysate Ca concentrations influence the efficacy and dosing of etelcalcetide with concomitant drugs. METHODS: We performed post hoc analyses of a 52-week, open-label, multicentre study of etelcalcetide in Japanese SHPT patients to determine whether dialysate Ca influences the therapeutic effects of etelcalcetide with concomitant drugs. We evaluated the differences in serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), corrected Ca (cCa) and phosphate levels among three dialysate Ca concentration groups (2.5, 2.75 or 3.0 mEq/L Ca). Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) levels were also compared. Since the dialysate Ca concentration may influence dose adjustment, we assessed the etelcalcetide and concomitant drug doses. RESULTS: There were no clinically meaningful differences in iPTH, cCa and phosphate levels among the 2.5, 2.75 and 3.0 mEq/L groups (n = 34, 64 and 35, respectively) over 52 weeks. At Week 52, more than 82%, 71% and 67% of patients had iPTH, cCa and phosphate levels within target ranges (60-240 pg/mL, 8.4-10.0 mg/dL and 3.5-6.0 mg/dL, respectively) across the three groups. TRACP-5b and BAP levels decreased by Week 52 regardless of dialysate Ca. Changes in etelcalcetide and concomitant drug doses were generally similar in each group. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and dosing of etelcalcetide with concomitant drugs were essentially unaffected by the dialysate Ca concentration. Patients showed improvements in bone hypermetabolism during treatment.

Calcimimetics and Bundled Reimbursement.

Since 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has provided reimbursement for renal dialysis services furnished to Medicare beneficiaries through a bundled payment system known as the Prospective Payment System. Medications that have no injectable equivalent, known as "oral-only medications," are currently excluded from the bundle and are paid separately through Medicare Part D. Thus, before the development of etelcalcetide, the first injectable calcimimetic, calcimimetics were reimbursed outside the bundle. Etelcalcetide's introduction and approval for use in Medicare triggered a transition payment for a minimum of 2 years that will eventually result in the incorporation of calcimimetics into the dialysis bundle. Consequently, providers may face incentives to reduce calcimimetic use when the transition period has expired. The complexity of bone-mineral management in conjunction with the paucity of evidence-based recommendations in this area makes it difficult to predict the impact of this transition. Because these medications are expensive, a poor transition could have financial ramifications for dialysis organizations and potentially patient health. To ensure that patients are not adversely affected, it is critical that Medicare incorporate these medications into the bundle carefully, with close monitoring of outcomes.

Improved Control of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Hemodialysis Patients Switching from Oral Cinacalcet to Intravenous Etelcalcetide, Especially in Nonadherent Patients.

BACKGROUND: Etelcalcetide is a novel second-generation calcimimetic that, because of its intravenous administration, could improve treatment adherence in secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of etelcalcetide compared with that of cinacalcet in controlling SHPT in patients under hemodialysis. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed in 29 patients with SHPT under hemodialysis who switched from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide with a follow-up of 6 months. A survey was conducted of adherence to the oral calcimimetic. The primary end-point of the study was to assess whether etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling SHPT. RESULTS: After the switch of treatment, none of the patients developed clinical intolerance or new adverse effects. Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in controlling intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), with an overall decrease in iPTH levels that was significant from the second month. Average calcium levels remained within the normal range, with a higher percentage of hypocalcemia with etelcalcetide (6.9 vs. 13.8%), which was asymptomatic in all cases. Patients who were nonadherent to cinacalcet (38%) showed a significant reduction in calcium and iPTH during follow-up with etelcalcetide. The adherent group (62%) also showed a trend to lower iPTH levels reaching statistical significance after 5 months of follow-up. The dose conversion factor for the switch from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide was etelcalcetide/session = 0.111*mg cinacalcet/day + 0.96, R2 = 0.57. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide was more effective than cinacalcet in this patient population, especially in the nonadherent subgroup, leading to better SHPT control without adverse effects.

A hemodialysis patient with bone disease after pregnancy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy is rare in women on hemodialysis. Recommendations for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) and preservation of bone health in pregnant dialysis patients are lacking. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a young woman with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) due to lupus nephritis, who developed multiple brown tumors while on hemodialysis during her second pregnancy. During her first pregnancy sHPT was well controlled and no skeletal complications occurred. Before the second pregnancy she developed severe sHPT. During pregnancy, dialysis time was increased to 24 h per week, the patient was given oral calcitriol, and the dialysate calcium concentration was set at 1.5 mmol/l. In week 20 the patient complained about bone pain in her left hip. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a cystic lesion compatible with a brown tumor. The baby was delivered in the 36th week by cesarean section. Further assessment identified multiple brown tumors of her skeleton, including the acetabulum, tibia, ribs, skull, thoracic spine and thumb. She required multiple orthopedic surgeries. Three months after pregnancy, etelcalcetide was started, which brought about a gradual improvement in her sHPT. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that the combination of pregnancy and severe sHPT in dialysis patients can have deleterious consequences for bone health.

Administration of Etelcalcetide for the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Patients with CKD-MBD on Hemodialysis: A Nephrology Nursing Perspective.

The number, volume, and timing of oral medications prescribed to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism can add to the burden of disease management for both the patient and the nurse. Administering intravenous (IV) medication when possible has the potential of reducing the burden of medication management. Data on the use of IV calcimimetic etelcalcetide has shown improvement in blood calcium, phosphorus, and parathyroid hormone levels. IV administration of etelcalcetide at the end of each hemodialysis session may reduce the pill burden for patients and has the potential to help improve disease management within an environment that supports person-centered care.

Discovery and Development of Calcimimetic and Calcilytic Compounds.

The extracellular calcium receptor (CaR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and the pivotal molecule regulating systemic Ca2+ homeostasis. The CaR was a challenging target for drug discovery because its physiological ligand is an inorganic ion (Ca2+) rather than a molecule so there was no structural template to guide medicinal chemistry. Nonetheless, small molecules targeting this receptor were discovered. Calcimimetics are agonists or positive allosteric modulators of the CaR, while calcilytics are antagonists and all to date are negative allosteric modulators. The calcimimetic cinacalcet was the first allosteric modulator of a GPCR to achieve regulatory approval and is a first-in-class treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on dialysis, and for hypercalcemia in some forms of primary hyperparathyroidism. It is also useful in treating some rare genetic diseases that cause hypercalcemia. Two other calcimimetics are now on the market (etelcalcetide) or under regulatory review (evocalcet). Calcilytics stimulate the secretion of parathyroid hormone and were initially developed as treatments for osteoporosis. Three different calcilytics of two different chemotypes failed in clinical trials due to lack of efficacy. Calcilytics are now being repurposed and might be useful in treating hypoparathyroidism and several rare genetic diseases causing hypocalcemia. The challenges ahead for medicinal chemists are to design compounds that select conformations of the CaR that preferentially target a particular signalling pathway and/or that affect the CaR in a tissue-selective manner.

Long-term effects of etelcalcetide as intravenous calcimimetic therapy in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a serious major complication in hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Long-term maintenance of serum phosphate, calcium, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in appropriate ranges in these patients is a major challenge. We investigated the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with etelcalcetide, a novel intravenous calcimimetic, in Japanese SHPT patients on long-term hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was a multicenter open-label study. A total of 191 hemodialysis patients with serum intact PTH (iPTH) > 240 pg/mL were enrolled. Etelcalcetide was administered thrice weekly for 52 weeks, with an initial dose of 5 mg and flexibility to adjust the dose between 2.5 and 15 mg and to adjust the dosing of concomitant medications for SHPT. The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with serum iPTH decreased to the target range (60-240 pg/mL). RESULTS: Serum iPTH levels decreased immediately after etelcalcetide was started. At the end of the study, 87.5% (95% confidence interval 81.4-92.2; 140/160 patients) of patients achieved target serum iPTH levels, with control of serum calcium and phosphate levels. Adverse events, mostly mild to moderate, were reported by 96.8% of patients and led to study discontinuation in 7.4% of patients. Nausea, vomiting, and symptomatic hypocalcemia were found in 4.7, 9.5, and 1.1%, with 0.5, 1.1, and 1.1% considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide effectively maintained serum iPTH, calcium, and phosphate levels in appropriate ranges with concomitant medications for SHPT for 52 weeks in Japanese hemodialysis patients, and was safe and well tolerated. REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-142665.