RESUMEN
Macaque-related injuries among primate workers can lead to a potentially fatal B virus encephalomyelitis. We describe a decision tool for evaluating the need for antiviral postexposure prophylaxis and provide a retrospective review of the injuries assessed in our center after its implementation in 2010. Among the injuries studied (n = 251), 40.6% were categorized as high-risk (prophylaxis recommended), 44.2% moderate-risk (consider prophylaxis), and 15.1% low-risk (prophylaxis not recommended). Ten percent of low-risk and 98% of high-risk injuries received prophylaxis (p<0.001). Compared with using universal postexposure prophylaxis, using a decision tool can lead to a standardization of practice and a reduction in prescriptions for antiviral medication.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Mordeduras y Picaduras , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/prevención & control , Herpesvirus Cercopitecino 1/inmunología , Macaca , Adulto , Animales , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Personal de Laboratorio , Masculino , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & control , Profilaxis Posexposición , Quebec , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection can cause severe disease in neonates and immunocompromised persons, and infectious mononucleosis in healthy adults. While, rhesus CMV (RhCMV) infects human cells in culture, it is unknown whether the virus can infect humans. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether primate workers, including those with injuries from animals, might be infected asymptomatically with RhCMV. STUDY DESIGN: We developed serologic assays that distinguish RhCMV from HCMV antibodies. We tested two groups of primate workers: those with documented injuries or mucosal splashes associated with rhesus macaques, and those with no documented exposure who worked with these animals. RESULTS: None of over 200 primate workers, including 119 with injuries or mucosal splashes associated with exposures to macaques, were seropositive for RhCMV. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of asymptomatic RhCMV infection in persons who work with rhesus macaques was <0.5% (<1/200 primate workers).