Factors associated with progression of arterial stiffness in ischemic stroke survivors: the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study.

BACKGROUND: Progressive arterial stiffening may increase the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in ischemic stroke survivors. Information about factors associated with progressive arterial stiffening during the follow-up of young patients with ischemic stroke is lacking. METHODS: Arterial stiffness by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure (24hBP) were assessed in 81 women and 190 men ≤60 years of age included in the Norwegian Stroke in the Young (NOR-SYS) study 3 months and 5.5 years after the incident ischemic stroke, representing baseline and follow-up. Covariables of change in cf-PWV were identified using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, women had less prevalent hypertension (53% vs. 69%, p < 0.05), and lower clinic and 24hBP than men, whereas age, obesity, and prevalence of smoking and antihypertensive drug treatment did not differ. During follow-up, systolic 24hBP remained unchanged, while diastolic 24hBP fell significantly (p < 0.01). Cf-PWV was lower in women both at baseline (7.3 m/s vs. 8.1 m/s) and at follow-up (7.3 m/s vs. 8.0 m/s, both p < 0.001), but the average change during follow-up did not differ between genders. In linear regression analysis, an increase in cf-PWV at the 5-year follow-up was associated with the presence of hypertension and lower cf-PWV at baseline, and higher systolic 24hBP and lack of use of antihypertensive treatment at follow-up (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In ischemic stroke survivors participating in the NOR-SYS study, the 5-year increase in cf-PWV did not differ between genders and was associated with higher systolic 24hBP and lack of antihypertensive treatment.

Progressive arterial stiffening increases the risk of recurrent stroke. More information about factors associated with progression of arterial stiffness in young ischemic stroke survivors is needed. This study followed 81 women and 190 men for 5 years and examined changes in arterial stiffness in relation to blood pressure levels and other factors.Arterial stiffness was measured using the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. We also measured blood pressure at study visits and over a 24-hour period while the study participants led their daily life. Measurements were performed 3 months after the index ischemic stroke (baseline) and repeated after an average of 5.5 years of follow-up.Our main finding was that hypertension is very common and is important for arterial health in young ischemic stroke survivors. An increase in arterial stiffness during follow-up was associated with hypertension, higher 24-hour blood pressure, and lack of use of blood pressure-lowering drugs in participants with hypertension. There were no differences between women and men.This study shows the importance of proper blood pressure management in young ischemic stroke survivors to avoid progressive stiffening of the arteries. The results also demonstrated the value of using 24-hour measurements rather than office measurements in the evaluation of blood pressure control during treatment.

Sex- and gender-specific differences in symptoms and health-related quality of life among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder affecting both men and women. Nonerosive reflux disease generally affects more women, whereas GERD complications such as Barrett's esophagus (BE) or esophageal cancer affect more men. The aim of this study was to evaluate sex- and gender-specific symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among men and women with GERD. Patients with clinical signs of reflux and completion of 24-hour pH-Impedance testing at the University Hospital Cologne were included into the study. Evaluation of symptoms and HRQoL included the following validated questionnaires: GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD HRQL), Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In all, 509 women and 355 men with GERD were included. Men had a significantly higher DeMeester score (60.2 ± 62.6 vs. 43 ± 49.3, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of BE (18.6 vs. 11.2%, P = 0.006). Women demonstrated significantly higher levels of anxiety (30.9 vs. 14.5%, P = 0.001), more severely impacting symptoms (45.3 ± 11.3 vs. 49.9 ± 12.3, P < 0.001), as well as physical (14.2 ± 5.7 vs. 16.7 ± 5.6, P < 0.001) and social dysfunction (13.3 ± 4.8 vs. 14.8 ± 4.3, P = 0.002). Women further reported a lower HRQoL (85.3 ± 22.7 vs. 92.9 ± 20.8, P < 0.001). Men and women differ on biological, psychological, and sociocultural levels.

Theory of change for addressing sex and gender bias, invisibility and exclusion in Australian health and medical research, policy and practice.

Sex and gender are inadequately considered in health and medical research, policy and practice, leading to preventable disparities in health and wellbeing. Several global institutions, journals, and funding bodies have developed policies and guidelines to improve the inclusion of diverse participants and consideration of sex and gender in research design and reporting and the delivery of clinical care. However, according to recent evaluations, these policies have had limited impact on the inclusion of diverse research participants, adequate reporting of sex and gender data and reducing preventable inequities in access to, and quality provision of, healthcare. In Australia, the Sex and Gender Policies in Medical Research (SGPMR) project aims to address sex and gender bias in health and medical research by (i) examining how sex and gender are currently considered in Australian research policy and practice; (ii) working with stakeholders to develop policy interventions; and (iii) understanding the wider impacts, including economic, of improved sex and gender consideration in Australian health and medical research. In this paper we describe the development of a theory of change (ToC) for the SGPMR project. The ToC evolved from a two-stage process consisting of key stakeholder interviews and a consultation event. The ToC aims to identify the pathways to impact from improved consideration of sex and gender in health and medical research, policy and practice, and highlight how key activities and policy levers can lead to improvements in clinical practice and health outcomes. In describing the development of the ToC, we present an entirely novel framework for outlining how sex and gender can be appropriately considered within the confines of health and medical research, policy and practice.

Same disease - different effect: maternal diabetes impact on birth weight stratified by fetal sex.

BACKGROUND: Male-sex is an independent risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes. One example is gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which is associated with large gestational age neonates. It was previously described that fetal glucose metabolism is affected by fetal sex. PURPOSE: To examine whether the birth weight of neonates is affected differently by GDM according to fetal sex. METHODS: A retrospective normalized cohort analysis, using the open database of 2017 Natality Data from the National Vital Statistics System in the US. We compared the delta in neonatal birth weight, according to fetal sex, between pregnancies with or without GDM. Linear regression was used to take into consideration the effect of multiple confounders. For evaluation whether fetal sex is an independent risk factor for macrosomia (> 4000 and > 4500 g) following pregnancies complicated by GDM we used multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A significant relationship was found between the sex of the neonate and the delta in birth weight associated with GDM (P-value < 0.0001). The average weight gain in neonates to GDM pregnancies was 71 g in females, and 56 g in males. The prevalence of macrosomia above 4000 g and 4500 g that was attributed to GDM was higher in female-sex neonates compared to male-sex neonates (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: According to our study results, female sex is associated with higher fetal weight gain in pregnancies complicated by GDM. Moreover, macrosomia's rate (> 4000 g and > 4500 g) attributed to GDM raised in a more significant manner in female-sex neonates.

Sex and gender differences in risk scores for dementia and Alzheimer's disease among cisgender, transgender, and non-binary adults.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have explored dementia risk according to sex and gender including for transgender and non-binary adults. This study evaluated dementia risk factors and risk scores among cisgender, transgender, and non-binary adults. METHODS: Observational data were drawn from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. A matched-cohort approach was used to develop sex (male, female) and gender identity cohorts (cisgender men, cisgender women, transgender men, transgender women, and non-binary adults) for comparison. Dementia risk scores were calculated using established mid-life and late-life risk score algorithms. RESULTS: Males had higher overall mid-life dementia risk, and lower late-life Alzheimer's disease risk compared to females. Transgender men, transgender women, and non-binary adults had higher overall late-life risk compared to both cisgender men and women. DISCUSSION: Future research is needed to build the evidence base for specific risk factors that may be contributing to higher overall risk among understudied and underserved gender groups. HIGHLIGHTS: Using data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, this matched-cohort study found that those assigned female at birth had lower overall mid-life dementia risk and higher overall late-life Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk compared to those assigned male at birth. Transgender men, transgender women, and non-binary adults all showed higher overall late-life AD risk compared to cisgender men and cisgender women. Between-group differences were found in the incidence of specific risk and protective factors for dementia and AD.

A review of the historical use of sex as a biological variable in the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Despite National Institute of Health (NIH) mandates requiring sex as a biological variable (SABV), female underrepresentation persists in research, driving the American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (Am J Physiol-Heart Circ) to publish SABV expectations in 2021. To determine progress within the Am J Physiol-Heart Circ, this mini-review evaluated SABV during the first 6 mo of each decade from 1980 to 2020, and 2019, to mitigate pandemic influence. Of the 1,205 articles published, 1,087 articles were included in this review (articles without original research subjects were excluded), of which 72.9% identified subjects. There were consistently fewer female human participants than males, except within 2019 (1980: females n = 3, males n = 5; 1990: females n = 70, males n = 199; 2000: females n = 305, males n = 355; 2010: females n = 186, males n = 472; 2019: females n = 1,695, males n = 1,550; 2020: females n = 1,157, males n = 1,222) and fewer female animals than males (1980: females n = 58, males n = 1,291; 1990: females n = 447, males n = 2,628; 2000: females n = 590, males n = 3,083; 2010: females n = 663, males n = 4,517; 2019: females n = 338, males n = 1,340; 2020: females n = 1,372, males n = 1,973). Only 16 (12.3%) articles including humans discussed SABV from 1980 to 2020. There are persistent SABV disparities within Am J Physiol-Heart Circ with some improvements in recent years. It is imperative that organizations such as the American Physiological Society and NIH foster an expectation of SABV as the norm, not the exception.

Words matter: The language of difference in human genetics.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in academia are leading publishers and journals to re-examine their use of terminology for commonly used scientific variables. This reassessment of language is particularly important for human genetics, which is focused on identifying and explaining differences between individuals and populations. Recent guidance on the use of terms and symbols in clinical practice, research, and publications is beginning to acknowledge the ways that language and concepts of difference can be not only inaccurate but also harmful. To stop perpetuating historical wrongs, those of us who conduct and publish genetic research and provide genetic health care must understand the context of the terms we use and why some usages should be discontinued. In this article, we summarize critiques of terminology describing disability, sex, gender, race, ethnicity, and ancestry in research publications, laboratory reports, diagnostic codes, and pedigrees. We also highlight recommendations for alternative language that aims to make genetics more inclusive, rigorous, and ethically sound. Even though norms of acceptable language use are ever changing, it is the responsibility of genetics professionals to uncover biases ingrained in professional practice and training and to continually reassess the words we use to describe human difference because they cause harm to patients.

Position Paper: SGIM Sex- and Gender-Based Women's Health Core Competencies.

Women's health care has evolved significantly since it was first acknowledged as an integral part of internal medicine training more than two decades ago. To update and clarify core competencies in sex- and gender-based women's health for general internists, the Society of General Internal Medicine (SGIM) Women and Medicine Commission prepared the following Position Paper, approved by the SGIM council in 2023. Competencies were developed using several sources, including the 2021 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Program Requirements for Internal Medicine and the 2023 American Board of Internal Medicine Certification Examination Blueprint. These competencies are relevant to the care of patients who identify as women, as well as gender-diverse individuals to whom these principles apply. They align with pivotal advances in women's health and acknowledge the changing context of patients' lives, reaffirming the role of general internal medicine physicians in providing comprehensive care to women.

Sex-oriented perspectives in immunopharmacology.

Several immunopharmacological agents are effective in the treatment of cancer and immune-mediated conditions, with a favorable impact on life expectancy and clinical outcomes for a large number of patients. Nevertheless, response variation and undesirable effects of these drugs represent major issues, and overall efficacy remains unpredictable. Males and females show a distinct difference in immune system responses, with females generally mounting stronger responses to a variety of stimuli. Therefore, exploring sex differences in the efficacy and safety of immunopharmacological agents would strengthen the practice of precision medicine. As a pharmacological target highlight, programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the first functionally characterized ligand of the coinhibitory programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1). The PD-L1/PD-1 crosstalk plays an important role in the immune response and is relevant in cancer, infectious and autoimmune disease. Sex differences in the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors are well documented, with male patients responding better than female patients. Similarly, higher efficacy of and adherence to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in chronic inflammatory conditions including rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease have been reported in male patients. The pharmacological basis of sex-specific responses to immune system modulating drugs is actively investigated in other settings such as stroke and type 1 diabetes. Advances in therapeutics targeting the endothelium could soon be wielded against autoimmunity and metabolic disorders. Based on the established sexual dimorphism in immune-related pathophysiology and disease presentation, sex-specific immunopharmacological protocols should be integrated into clinical guidelines.

"What's Sex and Gender Got to Do With It?" A Scoping Review of Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies of Medication Adherence.

OBJECTIVES: Medication taking is a complex multidimensional behavior that may be impeded by a range of biological and psychosocial factors, including sex and gender. We aimed to synthesize how sex and gender have been reported and analyzed in pharmacoepidemiologic studies of medication. METHODS: We searched for English-language peer-reviewed articles of observational studies (eg, cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control) that examined medication adherence among adults and included sex or gender in their reporting. RESULTS: We included 937 studies among 530 537 287 participants published between the year 1979 and 2021. Most studies were cross-sectional (47%), lasted ≤ 1 year (35%), examined self-reported adherence (53%), did not assess specific adherence problem(s) (40%), and included medications for cardiovascular conditions (24%) or systemic infections (24%). A quarter of studies (25%) used sex and gender interchangeably, more than one third of studies (36%) that reported gender data likely collected data on sex, and < 1% of studies described sex and gender as distinct variables. Studies of cisgender participants more often reported that females/women experienced greater adherence problems often than males/men (31% vs 20%), particularly discontinuation and cost-related nonadherence. Only 21 studies (2%) reported on transgender individuals, and these predominantly examined antiretroviral medications for HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our review revealed substantial conflation of sex and gender in studies of medication adherence and a paucity of research among transgender individuals. Moreover, our synthesis showed sex/gender disparities in medication taking with studies reporting greater medication adherence problems among cisgender women and transgender participants than cisgender men.

The Impact of Sex and Gender in Medicine and Pharmacology.

Sex and gender play a pivotal role in health and disease. Differences can be identified in symptoms, biomarkers, lifetime experiences of diseases, incidence, prevalence, therapeutic options, health-related behavior, and resiliency. However, awareness of sex and gender differences in medicine is still limited. Systematic implementation of sex and gender-sensitive research is not yet the norm, resulting in gaps in evidence especially in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases in women. For decades research has predominantly included male persons and animals, leading to a lack of information about symptoms in female individuals or the classification of their symptoms as "atypical". Currently, the inclusion of female participants in clinical marketing access trials is mandatory. However, this does not automatically translate into sex-disaggregated analyses potentially limiting the discovery of sex-specific targeted therapeutic schemes. Consistent consideration of sex and gender in planning, conducting, analyzing, and dissemination of pharmacological research projects is an important prerequisite for closing the gender data gap. Targeted implementation strategies might help to include sex and gender aspects in different parts of the health system and thereby support the improvement of health care for all patients. Health economic aspects could be a further drive for the implementation of sex- and gender-sensitive medicine.The current chapter focuses on the role of sex and gender in biomedical research and, consequently, their potential role in pharmacology. We will explore the commonly used terminology in the field, the historical development of sex and gender-sensitive medicine (SGSM), the relevance of sex and gender to research and clinical practice and conclude with an outlook on future developments in the field.

The use of key social determinants of health variables in psychiatric research using routinely collected health data: a systematic analysis.

PURPOSE: Social determinants of health (SDoH) impact psychiatric conditions. Routinely collected health data are frequently used to evaluate important psychiatric clinical and health services outcomes. This study explored how key SDoH are used in psychiatric research employing routinely collected health data. METHODS: A search was conducted in PubMed for English-language articles published in 2019 that used routinely collected health data to study psychiatric conditions. Studies (n = 19,513) were randomly ordered for title/abstract review; the first 150 meeting criteria progressed to full-text review. Three key SDoH categories were assessed: (1) gender and sex, (2) race and ethnicity, and (3) socioeconomic status. Within each category, data were extracted on how variables were included, defined, and used in study design and analysis. RESULTS: All studies (n = 103) reported on at least one of the key SDoH variables; 102 (99.0%) studies included a gender and/or sex variable, 30 (29.1%) included a race and/or ethnicity variable, and 55 (53.4%) included a socioeconomic status variable. No studies explicitly differentiated between gender and sex, and SDoH were often defined only as binary variables. SDoH were used to define the target population in 14 (13.6%) studies. Within analysis, SDoH were most often included as confounders (n = 65, 63.1%), exposures or predictors (n = 23, 22.3%), and effect modifiers (n = 14, 13.6%). Only 21 studies (20.4%) disaggregated results by SDoH and 7 (6.8%) considered intersections between SDoH. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest improvements are needed in how key SDoH are used in routinely collected health data-based psychiatric research, to ensure relevance to diverse populations and improve equity-oriented research.

Gender inequalities in heat-related mortality in the Czech Republic.

It is acknowledged that climate change exacerbates social inequalities, and women have been reported as more vulnerable to heat than men in many studies in Europe, including the Czech Republic. This study aimed at investigating the associations between daily temperature and mortality in the Czech Republic in the light of a sex and gender perspective, taking into account other factors such as age and marital status. Daily mean temperature and individual mortality data recorded during the five warmest months of the year (from May to September) over the period 1995-2019 were used to fit a quasi-Poisson regression model, which included a distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) to account for the delayed and non-linear effects of temperature on mortality. The heat-related mortality risks obtained in each population group were expressed in terms of risk at the 99th percentile of summer temperature relative to the minimum mortality temperature. Women were found generally more at risk to die because of heat than men, and the difference was larger among people over 85 years old. Risks among married people were lower than risks among single, divorced, and widowed people, while risks in divorced women were significantly higher than in divorced men. This is a novel finding which highlights the potential role of gender inequalities in heat-related mortality. Our study underlines the relevance of including a sex and gender dimension in the analysis of the impacts of heat on the population and advocates the development of gender-based adaptation policies to extreme heat.

Achieving Equity in Emergency Medicine Quality Measures Requires a Sex and Gender Lens.

BACKGROUND: Quality measures within Emergency Medicine (EM) were developed to standardize and improve care. Their development has been limited by lack of consideration of sex- and gender-based differences. Research has suggested that sex and gender can impact clinical care and treatment. Inclusion of sex and gender differences is needed to create EM quality measures that are equitable to all. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the review is to provide a brief history of EM quality measures and the value of considering sex- and gender-based evidence in their development to ensure equity, using acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as an example. DISCUSSION: Current quality measures related to AMI, such as time-to-electrocardiogram and door-to-balloon time in percutaneous coronary intervention, may have important and modifiable disparities when stratified by sex. Even when presenting with signs and symptoms of AMI, women experience delayed time to diagnosis and treatment. Few studies have considered interventions to mitigate these differences. However, the data available suggest that sex-based disparities can be minimized by implementation of strategies such as a quality control checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Quality measures were created to deliver high-quality, evidence-based, and standardized care, but without the inclusion of sex and gender metrics, they may not advance care to an equitable level.

Transplacental permeability of heavy metals in relation to newborn sex - evidence from the neurodevelopment project.

Introduction: Gender medicine is an innovative medical approach that studies how some biological variables are influenced by the male or female sex and gender. This issue is under debate because it characterizes the impact of tailored or individual medicine. In this scenario, the aim of this study is to study the correlation between heavy metal exposure and pathologies of neurodevelopment, according to the sex of newborns. In particular, this is an observational study under the name of the Neurosviluppo Project, involving 217 mother-child couples. Material and methods: The correlation with phenotype small for gestational age and congenital malformations were studied, but above all we focused on the pattern of placental permeability to heavy metals. Results: Our results are specifically related to foetal medicine and investigate the impact of foetal sex in transplacental metal exposure. Our results did not show any significant differences related to foetal sex in terms of congenital malformations or the other variables taken into consideration. However, because these conclusions are the first related to the gender medicine in transplacental foetal medicine, they could be a marked background for further studies. Conclusions: Considering the lack of data in literature regarding foetal sexual medicine and transplacental exposure, these study results are pioneering in terms of sexual foetal medicine. Possibly in the future, studies regarding the correlation between foetal sex and obstetrics outcomes will be performed.

Neurofeminism: Feminist critiques of research on sex/gender differences in the neurosciences.

Over the last three decades, the human brain and its role in determining behavior have been receiving a growing amount of attention in academia as well as in society more generally. Neuroscientific explanations of human behavior or other phenomena are often especially appealing to lay people. Therefore, neuroscientific explanations that can affect individuals, groups, or social relations in general should be formulated in a careful and responsible way. One field in which especially feminist scholars request more caution is the neuroscientific examination of sex/gender differences. Feminist scholars have described various ways in which sexist bias might be present in neuroscientific research on sex/gender differences. In this context, they coined the term "neurosexism" to describe the entanglement between neuroscientific work and sexist ideology, and "neurofeminism" as a response to that. Here, we aim to give an overview over the contemporary neurofeminist literature. In the first part, common levels of analysis in the neurofeminist literature are presented and the research level is explored in more detail. In the second part, some common developments in more recent neurofeminist scholarship are discussed. For this, we review recent publications with the aim to provide neuroscientists with a solid understanding of neurofeminist criticism so that they may evaluate neuroscientific claims about on sex/gender differences from this critical perspective.

Smoking and combined oral contraceptives should be considered as an independent variable in sex and gender-oriented studies.

The influence of sex combined with smoking and combined oral contraceptives (COC) use on atherogenic indexes is scarcely studied. Thus, traditional lipid parameters were measured, and non-traditional atherogenic indexes were calculated in a young and healthy population of men, COC-free women, and COC users. Total cholesterol (TChol), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and HDL/LDL ratio were lower in men, while triglycerides (TG)/HDL ratio, atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), Castelli's Risk Index I (CRII) and CRI-II, atherogenic coefficient (AC), creatinine, creatinine clearance, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were higher in men. The use of COC modified TChol, HDL, TG, TG/HDL, and AIP which had significantly higher values in COC users. In addition, TG were also increased in COC users in comparison with men. Smoking reduced sexually divergent parameters: BMI, TG, HDL/LDL, TG/HDL, AIP, CRII, CRI-II, and AC became similar among the three cohorts, losing the reported sex differences. Smoking also reduced differences in TChol, HDL, TG, and AIP between COC-free women and COC users, but it does not affect CRII, CRI-II, creatinine, creatinine clearance, and eGFR, underlining that COC users and COC-free women have to be considered two different populations. Our results represent a complex landscape suggesting that for both sexes smoking should be an independent variable in medical studies. Moreover, in women, the use of COC evidenced two different cohorts. Thus, more variables should be considered during a single study indicating that sex, smoking, and COC should be studied together to get a picture of the real-life context.

Inclusion, characteristics, and outcomes of male and female participants in large international perioperative studies.

BACKGROUND: We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes and evaluated the subgroup effects of randomised interventions by sex in males and females in large international perioperative trials. METHODS: Nine randomised trials and two cohort studies recruiting adult patients, conducted between 1995 and 2020, were included. Baseline characteristics and outcomes common to six or more studies were evaluated. Regression models included terms for sex, study, and an interaction between the two. Comparing outcomes without adjustment for baseline characteristics represents the 'total effect' of sex on the outcome. RESULTS: Of 54 626 participants, 58% were male and 42% were female. Females were less likely to have ASA physical status ≥3 (56% vs 64%), to smoke (15% vs 23%), have coronary artery disease (21% vs 32%), or undergo vascular surgery (10% vs 23%). The pooled incidence of death was 1.6% in females and 1.8% in males (risk ratio [RR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.05; P=0.20), of myocardial infarction was 4.2% vs 4.5% (RR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.81-1.03; P=0.10), of stroke was 0.5% vs 0.6% (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35; P=0.81), and of surgical site infection was 8.6% vs 8.3% (RR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.79-1.35; P=0.70). Treatment effects of three interventions demonstrated statistically significant effect modification by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Females were in the minority in all included studies. They were healthier than males, but outcomes were comparable. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for this discrepancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Registry of Meta-Research (UID: IRMR_000011; 5 January 2021).

The relationship between craving and insular morphometry in regular cocaine users: Does sex matter?

While it has been suggested that cocaine use and relapse in women is more strongly related to stress-relief craving, whereas cocaine use in men is more strongly related to reward craving, the neural mechanisms that underlie these differences are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate sex-dependent differences in insular morphometry and associations with craving, in a sample of regular cocaine users (CUs) and non-drug using controls (non-CUs). It was hypothesized that insular volume, thickness and surface area would be lower in CU women, compared with CU men and non-CUs. It was furthermore hypothesized that insular morphometry, particularly insular thickness, would be negatively associated to reward craving in CU men, while being negatively associated with stress-relief craving in CU women. In contrast to the hypothesis, we did not find evidence of sex-specific differences in insular morphometry in CUs. However, sex-specific association between stress-relief craving and insular morphometry were found: Right insular volume was negatively associated with stress-relief craving in CU women, whereas this association was positive in CU men. Additionally, right insular surface area was negatively associated with stress-relief craving in cocaine-using men, whereas this association was positive in cocaine-using women. In conclusion, the current study provides first evidence of sex-specific differences in the association between craving and insular morphometry in a sample of regular cocaine users. Although speculative, these sex-specific alterations in insular morphometry may underlie higher stress-induced craving and relapse in CU women compared with CU men.

Gender and work in ergonomics: recent trends.

Since the establishment of the Gender and Work Technical Committee (TC) of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA) in 2006, many researchers have addressed the role of sex and gender in ergonomics, producing a great deal of new information. This special issue aims to present new ways of viewing women's work and gender differences in work-related injury risks in an era of rapidly changing labour market configurations. It offers innovative methods for integrating sex and gender into ergonomic analysis and for designing work environments. It shares reflections on the intersection of vulnerabilities according to certain identity markers. Finally, it contributes to establishing milestones standards of practice so that the consideration of sex and gender can be more systematically modelled in ergonomics research and interventions, for example, in training ergonomists or in knowledge transfer initiatives.Practitioner summary: This editorial article provides an overview of the background and the content of the Special Issue 'Gender and Work in Ergonomics: Recent trends'.