Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(15)2021 Jul 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34360793

RESUMEN

Tumor-endothelial cell interactions represent an essential mechanism in spinal metastasis. Ephrin-B2-EphB4 communication induces tumor cell repulsion from the endothelium in metastatic melanoma, reducing spinal bone metastasis formation. To shed further light on the Ephrin-B2-EphB4 signaling mechanism, we researched the effects of pharmacological EphB4 receptor stimulation and inhibition in a ligand-dependent/independent context. We chose a preventative and a post-diagnostic therapeutic window. EphB4 stimulation during tumor cell seeding led to an increase in spinal metastatic loci and number of disseminated melanoma cells, as well as earlier locomotion deficits in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, reduction of metastatic loci with a later manifestation of locomotion deficits occurred. Thus, EphB4 receptor stimulation affects metastatic dissemination depending on the presence/absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. After the manifestation of solid metastasis, EphB4 kinase inhibition resulted in significantly earlier manifestation of locomotion deficits in the presence of the ligand. No post-diagnostic treatment effect was found in the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. For solid metastasis treatment, EphB4 kinase inhibition induced prometastatic effects in the presence of endothelial Ephrin-B2. In the absence of endothelial Ephrin-B2, both therapies showed no effect on the growth of solid metastasis.


Asunto(s)
Efrina-B2/metabolismo , Melanoma Experimental/metabolismo , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Receptor EphB4/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Efrina-B2/genética , Ligandos , Melanoma Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma Experimental/genética , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Receptor EphB4/genética , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/genética , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario
2.
Cancer Diagn Progn ; 3(4): 449-456, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37405221

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: To evaluate the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) for prediction of survival in patients with spinal column metastasis of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of spinal instability was performed in patients with CRPC using SINS. Overall survival was evaluated starting from the time of SINS evaluation. The subjects were 42 patients with CRPC among 261 cases diagnosed with metastatic spinal tumors by radiologists, among 42,152 cases that underwent a body computed tomography scan at Kawasaki Medical School Hospital within 32 months from December 2013 to July 2016. RESULTS: The median age was 78 (range=55-91 years), the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at SINS evaluation was 42.1 (0.1-3,121.6) ng/ml, and 11 patients had visceral metastasis. The median periods from diagnosis of bone metastasis and development of CRPC to SINS evaluation were 17 (0-158) and 20 (0-149) months, respectively. The spine was stable in 32 cases (group S) and potentially unstable or unstable in 10 (24%) (group U). The median observation period was 17.5 (0-83) months and 36 patients died. The median survival period after SINS evaluation was longer in group S than that in group U (20 vs. 10 months, p=0.0221). In multivariate analysis, PSA level, visceral metastasis, and spinal instability were significant prognostic factors. The hazard ratio for patients in group U was 2.60 (95%CI=1.07-5.93, p=0.0345). CONCLUSION: Spinal stability evaluated using SINS is a new prognostic factor for survival of patients with spinal metastasis of CRPC.

3.
Front Oncol ; 11: 659779, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34221976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) varies greatly. In this study, we aimed to define the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of RCC with spinal bone metastasis (sBM) in our center. METHODS: The clinical and medical records of RCC patients with sBMs were collected. The gender, age, time of BM, the extent of BM, the number of BMs, the presence or absence of visceral metastasis, and the pathological type of BM were investigated. All patients were followed up regularly. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of BMs diagnosis to death or last follow-up using Kaplan-Meier method and modelled with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Forty-three RCC patients with sBM were collected. sBM was found synchronously in 30 patients (70%) and metachronously in 13 patients (30%). The median survival time was 30 months in 13 patients (30%) with solitary sBM and 19 months in 30 patients (70%) with multiple sBMs (P = 0.002). Visceral metastasis occurred in 12 patients (28%) with the median survival time of 17 months, while the other 31 patients (72%) had no visceral metastasis with the median survival time of 29 months (P<0.001). En-block resection was done in 10 patients with median survival time of 40.1 months. Non-en-block resection were done in 33 patients with median survival time of 19.7 months (P<0.001). Multivariate COX regression analysis showed that MSKCC score, number of BM, visceral metastasis, and en-block resection are the independent prognosis factors of RCC patients with sBM. CONCLUSIONS: MSKCC risk stratification, number of sBM, visceral metastasis and en-block resection are significant prognostic factors for OS in RCC patients with spinal BM. Therefore, for selected patients who has solitary spinal BM with no visceral metastasis, en-block resection of spinal BM can potentially prolong survival and is the treatment of choice.

4.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res ; 106(6): 1033-1038, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32753354

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Onset of spinal bone metastasis is a turning point in the progression of tumoral disease; although incidence is increasing, management is not standardized. Various prognostic scores are available, but advances in medical and surgical treatment have made them less well adapted, and sometimes discordant for a given patient. It would therefore be useful to develop new prognostic instruments. The aim of the present study was to identify biologic risk factors for onset of postoperative complications and death following spinal bone metastasis surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective multicenter study included all patients operated on for spinal bone metastasis between November 2015 and May 2017. The main epidemiologic data and biologic data (CRP, albuminemia, calcemia) were collected preoperatively. Surgical strategy, death and/or postoperative complications were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Five of the initial 264 patients died during the immediate postoperative course, and 107 within 6 months. At 1 year, 57 patients remained alive. Twenty-six (10%) were lost to follow-up. Preoperative albuminemia<35g/L (29% of patients), calcemia>2.6 nmol/L (8%) and CRP>10mg/L (47.5%) were associated with significantly elevated mortality. Only CRP elevation correlated with postoperative complications rate. CONCLUSION: The study confirmed the prognostic value of 3 biologic parameters (CRP level, albuminemia, calcemia) for survival after spinal bone metastasis surgery. A hybrid score taking account of not only clinical but also biologic parameters should be developed to improve estimation of survival.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Columna Vertebral
5.
J Clin Med ; 8(8)2019 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31416169

RESUMEN

Zoledronate (Zol) is an anti-resorptive/tumoral agent used for the treatment of many cancers including spinal bone metastasis. High systemic administration of a single dose is now the standard clinical care, yet it has been associated with several side effects. Here, we aimed to evaluate the effects of lower doses Zol on lung cancer and lung cancer-induced bone metastasis cells over a longer time period. Human lung cancer (HCC827) and three bone metastases secondary to lung cancer (BML1, BML3 and BML4) cells were treated with Zol at 1, 3 and 10 µM for 7 days and then assessed for cell proliferation, migration, invasion and apoptosis. Low Zol treatment significantly decreased cell proliferation (1, 3 and 10 µM), migration (3 and 10 µM) and invasion (10 µM) while increasing apoptosis (10 µM) in lung cancer and metastatic cells. Our data exploits the potential of using low doses Zol for longer treatment periods and reinforces this approach as a new therapeutic regimen to impede the development of metastatic bone cancer while limiting severe side effects following high doses of systemic drug treatment.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA