RESUMEN
Infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia may require high doses of neurosedative medications to ensure pain control and stability following tracheostomy placement. Subsequent weaning of these medications safely and rapidly is a challenge. We describe a 24-hour propofol infusion to reduce neurosedative medications in 3 high-risk infants following tracheostomy placement.
Asunto(s)
Displasia Broncopulmonar , Propofol , Traqueostomía , Humanos , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Traqueostomía/métodos , Masculino , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Lactante , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Electrodiagnostic examinations, such as nerve conduction studies (NCS) and needle electromyography (EMG), are perceived as painful by children and their parents/guardians. Methods to reduce peri-procedural pain improve compliance and have neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric benefits. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of combined oral and topical analgesics (COTA), oral analgesics (OA), and placebo in reducing pain during NCS/EMG in children. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on children presenting to our neurophysiology lab. Patients were stratified into two age groups (6M-6Y and 7Y-18Y) and randomized into three arms: COTA, OA, and placebo. Pain scores post-NCS/EMG were assessed using the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS) and Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). RESULTS: One hundred thirteen participants were enrolled. A comparison of participants from both age groups combined revealed no significant differences in guardian FPS-R scores across all arms for NCS and EMG. A significant difference in the distribution of post-NCS FPS-R score severities in children aged 7Y-18Y was noted between OA and placebo (p = .007). EMG was more painful than NCS across all arms (p < .05). In children aged 6M-6Y undergoing at least 10 muscle samplings during EMG, those receiving COTA had significantly lower pain scores (p = .014). DISCUSSION: This study reveals the complexity of pediatric pain perception during NCS/EMG and highlights that other methods to reduce experienced pain are required. Our findings suggest that procedural characteristics, such as number of muscles sampled, may influence the effectiveness of analgesia and serve as a foundation for future research aimed at optimizing pain management strategies.
Asunto(s)
Administración Tópica , Electromiografía , Dimensión del Dolor , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Método Doble Ciego , Administración Oral , Preescolar , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgesia/métodos , Electrodiagnóstico/métodos , Conducción Nerviosa/efectos de los fármacos , Conducción Nerviosa/fisiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/diagnósticoRESUMEN
AIMS: Esketamine may reduce acute postoperative pain in several settings. However, the effects of low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain after vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection with propofol/remifentanil total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) are unclear. The aim of this study is to observe the effects of intraoperative low-dose esketamine on postoperative pain after vestibular schwannoma resection. METHODS: This single-centre, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial included 90 adults undergoing VS resection via the retrosigmoid approach with TIVA. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups: esketamine or control (n = 45 in each group). Patients received low-dose esketamine (0.2 mg/kg) or a similar volume of normal saline after dural closure. The primary outcome was the pain score during movement (gentle head movement) at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included recovery time, bispectral index (BIS) values and haemodynamic profiles during the first 30 min after esketamine administration, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Low-dose esketamine did not reduce pain scores at rest (P > .05) or with movement (P > .05) within the first 24 h after surgery. Esketamine moderately increased BIS values for at least 30 min after administration (P < .0001) but did not affect heart rate (P = .992) or mean arterial blood pressure (P = .994). Esketamine prolonged extubation time (P = .042, 95% confidence interval: 0.08 to 4.42) and decreased the effect-site concentration of remifentanil at extubation (P = .001, 95% confidence interval: -0.53 to -0.15) but did not affect the time to resumption of spatial orientation. Postoperative nausea and vomiting rates did not differ between groups, and no hallucinations or excessive sedation was observed. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative low-dose esketamine did not significantly reduce acute pain after VS resection with propofol/remifentanil TIVA. However, BIS values increased for at least 30 min after esketamine administration.
Asunto(s)
Ketamina , Neuroma Acústico , Dolor Postoperatorio , Remifentanilo , Humanos , Método Doble Ciego , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Remifentanilo/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Intravenosos/efectos adversos , Dimensión del Dolor , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Propofol/efectos adversos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Intravenosa/métodos , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with acute migraine. BACKGROUND: Parenteral agents have been shown to be effective in treating acute migraine pain; however, the comparative effectiveness of different approaches is unclear. METHODS: Nine electronic databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify randomized clinical trials assessing parenteral agents to treat acute migraine pain in emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study screening, data extraction, and Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment, with differences being resolved by adjudication. The protocol of the review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42018100096). RESULTS: A total of 97 unique studies were included, with most studies reporting a high or unclear risk of bias. Monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, successfully reduced pain scores prior to discharge. They also increased the proportion of patients reporting pain relief and being pain free. Across the pain outcomes assessed, combination therapy was one of the higher ranked approaches and provided robust improvements in pain outcomes, including lowering pain scores (mean difference -3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.64 to -2.08) and increasing the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (risk ratio [RR] 2.83, 95% CI 1.74-4.61). Neuroleptics and metoclopramide also ranked high in terms of the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (neuroleptics RR 2.76, 95% CI 2.12-3.60; metoclopramide RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.90-3.49) and being pain free before emergency department discharge (neuroleptics RR 4.8, 95% CI 3.61-6.49; metoclopramide RR 4.1, 95% CI 3.02-5.44). Most parenteral agents were associated with increased adverse events, particularly combination therapy and neuroleptics. CONCLUSIONS: Various parenteral agents were found to provide effective pain relief. Considering the consistent improvements across various outcomes, combination therapy, as well as monotherapy of either metoclopramide or neuroleptics are recommended as first-line options for managing acute migraine pain. There are risks of adverse events, especially akathisia, following treatment with these agents. We recommend that a shared decision-making model be considered to effectively identify the best treatment option based on the patient's needs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Metoclopramida/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Metaanálisis en Red , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic migraine exerts substantial negative impacts on daily functioning. Efforts to manage impaired functioning may result in medication overuse, which contributes to the worsening profile and chronification of migraine. The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ) is a recently developed measure assessing the impact of migraine on physical, social, and emotional function. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to assess changes in MFIQ scores following initiation or modification of migraine preventive medication and determine if changes in function are associated with changes in other aspects of migraine burden, such as headache frequency, headache intensity, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy (MOTS) trial, a prospective pragmatic clinical trial that investigated two treatment strategies for those with chronic migraine and medication overuse. Data from both treatment arms were pooled and analyzed using a pre-post design. Prior to and 12 weeks following initiation or modification of migraine preventive medication, participants completed a series of questionnaires that captured migraine characteristics, medication use, migraine-related physical impairment (MFIQ), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 [PHQ-9]) symptoms. Changes from baseline in all measures were assessed using the paired t-test. Relationships between changes in MFIQ scores and other measures were assessed using linear regression. Multivariable modeling was performed to determine which additional variables contributed to the change in MFIQ beyond that already explained by an individual variable. Model terms were selected by using elastic net regularization. Only those participants who completed the baseline and 12-week MFIQ were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Of the 537 patients, 88.2% were female, and the average age was 45 years (standard deviation 13). The mean frequency of days with moderate-to-severe headache improved 39.2% from 13.5 per 30 days at baseline to 8.1 per 30 days at week 12. The mean MFIQ Usual Activities Global score improved by 15.0 points (on a 100-point scale). All five domains (Usual Activities Global, Usual Activities, Social Function, Emotional Function, Physical Function) of the MFIQ improved by a mean of at least 13.0 points. Changes in PHQ-9 score, followed by changes in headache frequency, had the strongest associations with change in all domains of the MFIQ. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of chronic migraine with medication overuse on physical, social, and emotional functioning substantially lessened following initiation or modification of migraine preventive medication. Improved functioning, as measured by the MFIQ, was most strongly associated with reductions in depression scores and headache frequency, highlighting the importance of recognizing and monitoring changes in depressive symptoms, in addition to headache frequency and functional impairment, when evaluating response to preventive medications.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/prevención & control , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Crónica , Cefaleas Secundarias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios Prospectivos , Uso Excesivo de Medicamentos Recetados/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Depresión , Ansiedad/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Medications prescribed to older adults in US skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and administrations of pro re nata (PRN) "as needed" medications are unobservable in Medicare insurance claims. There is an ongoing deficit in our understanding of medication use during post-acute care. Using SNF electronic health record (EHR) datasets, including medication orders and barcode medication administration records, we described patterns of PRN analgesic prescribing and administrations among SNF residents with hip fracture. METHODS: Eligible participants resided in SNFs owned by 11 chains, had a diagnosis of hip fracture between January 1, 2018 to August 2, 2021, and received at least one administration of an analgesic medication in the 100 days after the hip fracture. We described the scheduling of analgesics, the proportion of available PRN doses administered, and the proportion of days with at least one PRN analgesic administration. RESULTS: Among 24 038 residents, 57.3% had orders for PRN acetaminophen, 67.4% PRN opioids, 4.2% PRN non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 18.6% PRN combination products. The median proportion of available PRN doses administered per drug was 3%-50% and the median proportion of days where one or more doses of an ordered PRN analgesic was administered was 25%-75%. Results differed by analgesic class and the number of administrations ordered per day. CONCLUSIONS: EHRs can be leveraged to ascertain precise analgesic exposures during SNF stays. Future pharmacoepidemiology studies should consider linking SNF EHRs to insurance claims to construct a longitudinal history of medication use and healthcare utilization prior to and during episodes of SNF care.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Fracturas de Cadera , Medicare , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería , Humanos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estados Unidos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pain is a common symptom following proximal femoral fractures (PFF), however, information on its treatment in terms of agents and type of use (scheduled vs. pro re nata [PRN]) is scarce. The main objective of this study was to examine pain medication regimens according to pain intensity following PFF. Furthermore, we explored the utilization of medication plans. METHODS: The "ProFem"-study on healthcare provision, functional ability, and quality of life after PFF is a German population-based prospective cohort study based on statutory health insurance data and individually linked survey data from different time points including information on the currently used medication. This present analysis refers to the participants' baseline interviews (about 3 months following PFF) conducted from 2018 to 2019 in the participants' private surroundings. RESULTS: The study population comprised 444 participants (mean age: 81.2 years, 71.0% female). Half of them reported high intensity pain, and the mean value for the EuroQol visual analogue scale was 50.8. Most commonly used analgesics were metamizole and tilidine/naloxone. Among participants with high intensity pain, 21.9% received only PRN pain medication and 17.2% no pain medication at all. Overall, 61.5% of participants presented any (printed) medication plan and only 25.2% a "federal standardized medication plan" (BMP). CONCLUSION: As a substantial number of patients reports high intensity pain about 3 months following a PFF, the large proportion of those receiving no or only PRN pain medication raises questions regarding the appropriateness of the therapy. The overall low utilization of the BMP indicates potential for improvement.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Fracturas de Cadera , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor , Humanos , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/epidemiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective management of cancer pain critically depends on timely medication administration and adherence to precise medication guidelines. In the context of limited time and a busy healthcare environment, tailoring the optimal medication schedule for each patient with cancer pain presents a significant challenge for physicians and clinical pharmacists. METHODS: To address this challenge, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of healthcare professionals' needs in guiding cancer pain medication. By developing core features based on key user needs and continuously updating them, we have created the Universal Medication Schedule System (UMSS). We invited 20 physicians and pharmacists specializing in oncology or cancer pain to trial the system and assessed UMSS usage through distributed questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified five key needs of healthcare professionals in cancer pain medication guidance. Based on these needs, we (1) constructed a comprehensive drug information database, including basic information for 1135 drugs, 130,590 drug interaction data entries, and 1409 individual medication timing constraints, and (2) developed a web-based system that provides essential reference information such as drug interactions and dietary restrictions. It can create medication schedules and provide medication education tailored to the patient's daily routine. Participating evaluators unanimously agreed (100%) that the system aids in accurately assessing the risks of polypharmacy and quickly scheduling medication regimens. CONCLUSION: UMSS, by offering personalized medication schedule support, assists healthcare professionals in better managing patients' medication treatment plans. However, further improvements are needed in the automation of database updates and maintenance, as well as in integrating it with electronic health records.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Humanos , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Esquema de Medicación , Personal de Salud , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pharmacologic intervention do not always achieve benefits in the treatment of acute/subacute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). We assessed efficacy and safety of acupuncture for acute/subacute NSLBP as alternative treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Epistemonikos, CNKI, Wan Fang Database, VIP database, CBMLD, CSTJ, clinical trials, EUCTR, World WHO ICTRP, and ChiCTR for randomized controlled trials, cross-over studies, and cohort studies of NSLBP treated by acupuncture versus oral medication from inception to 23th April 2022. A total of 6 784 records were identified, and 14 studies were included 1 263 participants in this review. The results of the meta-analysis indicated that acupuncture therapy was slightly more effective than oral medication in improving pain (P < 0.00001, I2 = 92%, MD = -1.17, 95% CI [-1.61, -0.72]). According to the results of the meta-analysis, acupuncture therapy exhibited a significant advantage over oral medication with a substantial effect (P < 0.00001, I2 = 90%, SMD = -1.42, 95% CI [-2.22, -0.62]). Based on the results of the meta-analysis, acupuncture therapy was associated with a 12% improvement rate compared to oral medication in patients with acute/subacute NSLBP (P < 0.0001, I2 = 54%, RR = 1.11, 95% CI [1.05, 1.18]). Acupuncture is more effective and safer than oral medication in treating acute/subacute NSLBP. This systematic review is poised to offer valuable guidance to clinicians treating acute/subacute NSLBP and potentially benefit the afflicted patients. REGISTRATION: This review was registered in PROSPERO ( http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero ) with registration number CRD42021278346.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Administración Oral , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Exercise referral schemes and self-management strategies have shown positive effects on patient-reported and objectively measured outcomes, such as increased functional capacity and physical activity level. However, the impact of these interventions on analgesic use remains uncertain. We hypothesised that exercise referral schemes, either utilised alone or in combination with self-management strategies, is more effective in reducing use of prescription analgesics compared with a self-management strategy only. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We utilised data from two completed randomised controlled trials, namely The Welfare Innovation in Primary Prevention (n = 121) and The SITLESS project (n = 338), and information from the national Danish health registries, including the National Prescription Registry. The two trials have investigated the effectiveness of interventions, which include exercise referral schemes and self-management strategies, on various aspects such as physical function and levels of physical activity among community-dwelling older adults. The studies were conducted in the period 2015-2020 and comprised older adults aged 65+ years, living in three different Danish municipalities. Participants were recruited through nationally regulated preventive home-visits. To estimate changes in use of prescription analgesics over time, a linear fixed effects regression model was applied. The outcome measure was the mean total yearly defined daily dose of analgesics. RESULTS: All intervention groups showed a within-group increase in overall analgesic use, though not statistically significantly different from zero. There were no differences in estimated changes in mean total yearly defined daily dose when comparing the intervention groups to the group receiving the least extensive intervention (self-management strategies/control). The findings indicated that exercise referral schemes and self-management strategies, whether administrated individually or in combination, did not result in a reduction in analgesic use over time.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Vida Independiente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema de Registros , Automanejo , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Automanejo/métodos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Derivación y Consulta , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychological factors such as anxiety and mood appear to influence acute postoperative pain; however, there is conflicting evidence on the relationship between preoperative psychological parameters and the severity of postoperative pain. In the context of the stressful setting of initial surgery for breast cancer, we conducted a prospective observational study of patients who were scheduled to undergo initial breast cancer surgery. METHODS: The objectives were to examine the potential associations between predefined preoperative psychological parameters and (i) Self-reported pain scores at discharge from the postoperative acute care unit, (ii) Cumulative perioperative opioid consumption at four hours postoperatively and (iii) Self-reported pain as measured during the first seven days after surgery. Patients completed the following questionnaires during the three hours prior to surgery: the Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI State and Trait), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Cohen Stress Questionnaire (CSQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS A and D), and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Postoperative pain experience was assessed using patient self-reports of pain (SF Magill Pain questionnaire on discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit and a pain diary for seven days postoperatively) and records of analgesic consumption. RESULTS: Pre- to postoperative self-reported pain was significantly different with respect to the STAI State, Cohen score and PCS for both low and high values (p < 0.001), but only patients categorized as having low STAI Trait, HADS A, and HADS D values achieved significant differences (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between preoperative state anxiety (STAI) and the most severe pain reported during the first seven days postoperatively (r = 0.271, p = 0.013). Patients who were categorized preoperatively as having a "high value" for each of the psychological parameters studied (HADS A and D, STAI State and Trait and PCS) tended to have greater perioperative opioid consumption (up to four hours postoperatively); this trend was statistically significant for HADS D and HADS A only. Using a linear regression model, state anxiety was found to be a significant predictor of postoperative pain based on self-reports during the first seven postoperative days (standardized ß = 0.271, t = 2.286, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Preoperative state anxiety, in particular, is associated with the severity of postoperative pain experienced by women undergoing initial breast cancer surgery. Formal preoperative assessment of anxiety may be warranted in this setting with a view to optimize perioperative analgesia and wellbeing.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Neoplasias de la Mama , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio , Autoinforme , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/psicología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Ansiedad/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Anciano , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Periodo Preoperatorio , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare self-reported pain levels across various treatment phases using passive self-ligating (Damon) and conventional (Victory) standardized fixed appliance systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adolescents (12-17 years old) with crowding and displaced teeth, planned for non-extraction treatment, were recruited from four orthodontic clinics. They were randomized into stratified blocks (1:1 ratio) using concealed allocation to receive Damon Q™ (34 boys, 28 girls) or Victory™ (39 boys, 31 girls). Pain and analgesic intake were assessed on seven different occasions with validated self-report questionnaires using a 10-grade scale. RESULTS: Of the 132 patients included, six were lost to follow up. Clinically relevant mean pain scores (≥4) were registered in both groups after bonding upper and lower arches and after insertion of 0.019 × 0.025 stainless steel archwire. The highest mean scores were reported on day two after bonding the upper arch (Damon 5.96, Victory 7.18, P = .011). In both groups, at least 40% reported taking analgesics during various treatment phases. The Damon group reported a lower intake of analgesics on days one and two (P = .042 and .037) after treatment initiation. In the entire sample, boys reported significantly higher mean pain scores than girls on the second and third days after bonding (P = .008 and .026, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lower pain levels were reported from the Damon group after bonding. In general, boys reported higher pain than girls did. Clinicians and adolescents need to be aware that clinically relevant pain levels can be expected not only after bonding but also in later phases.
Asunto(s)
Maloclusión , Aparatos Ortodóncicos Fijos , Dimensión del Dolor , Autoinforme , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Maloclusión/terapia , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Alambres para Ortodoncia , Diseño de Aparato OrtodóncicoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicentric phase IIA clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability of oral administration of NFX-88 in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and explore its efficacy in pain control. SETTING: A total of 7 spinal cord injury rehabilitation units in Spain. METHODS: A total of 61 adult with traumatic complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (C4-T12 level), were randomised 1:1:1:1 to a placebo, NFX88 1.05 g, 2.1 g, 4.2 g/day for up to 12 weeks. The placebo or NFX-88 was administered as add-on therapy to pre-existing pregabalin (150-300 mg per day). Safety and tolerability were evaluated, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was the primary measure to explore the efficacy of NFX-88 in pain control. RESULTS: No severe treatment-related adverse effects were reported for any of the four study groups. 44 SCI individuals completed the study and were analysed. The data obtained from the VAS analysis and the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) suggested that the combination of NFX88 with pregabalin is more effective than pregabalin with placebo at reducing neuropathic pain (NP) in individuals with SCI and that the dose 2.10 g/day causes the most dramatic pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: NFX88 treatment was found to be highly safe and well tolerated, with the dose of 2.10 g/day being the most effective at causing pain relief. Thus, the promising efficacy of this first-in-class lipid mediator deserves further consideration in future clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Neuralgia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Administración Oral , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Pregabalina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dimensión del Dolor , Anciano , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite being integral to women's well-being, achieving good menstrual health (MH) remains a challenge. This study examined MH services uptake (including information, analgesics, and a choice of MH products - the menstrual cup and reusable pads) and sustained use of MH products within an integrated sexual and reproductive health intervention for young people in Zimbabwe. METHODS: This mixed-methods study was nested within a cluster randomised trial of integrated sexual and reproductive health services (CHIEDZA) for youth in three provinces (Harare, Mashonaland East, and Bulawayo). The study collected qualitative and quantitative data from 27,725 female clients aged 16-24 years, who accessed CHIEDZA from April 2019 - March 2022. Using a biometric (fingerprint recognition) identification system, known as SIMPRINTS, uptake of MH information, products, and analgesics and other services was tracked for each client. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to investigate MH service uptake and product choice and use over time, and the factors associated with these outcomes. Thematic analysis of focus group discussions and interviews were used to further explore providers' and participants' experiences of the MH service and CHIEDZA intervention. RESULTS: Overall, 36,991 clients accessed CHIEDZA of whom 27,725 (75%) were female. Almost all (n = 26,448; 95.4%) took up the MH service at least once: 25433 took up an MH product with the majority (23,346; 92.8%) choosing reusable pads. The uptake of cups varied across province with Bulawayo province having the highest uptake (13.4%). Clients aged 20-24 years old were more likely to choose cups than reusable pads compared with those aged 16-19 years (9.4% vs 6.0%; p < 0.001). Over the implementation period, 300/1819 (16.5%) of clients swapped from the menstrual cup to reusable pads and 83/23346 (0.4%) swapped from reusable pads to the menstrual cup. Provision of the MH service encouraged uptake of other important SRH services. Qualitative findings highlighted the provision of free integrated SRH and MH services that included a choice of MH products and analgesics in a youth-friendly environment were key to high uptake and overall female engagement with SRH services. CONCLUSIONS: High uptake demonstrates how the MH service provided much needed access to MH products and information. Integration of MH within an SRH intervention proved central to young women accessing other SRH services.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Productos para la Higiene Menstrual/estadística & datos numéricos , Productos para la Higiene Menstrual/provisión & distribución , Menstruación , Salud Reproductiva , Servicios de Salud Reproductiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Sexual , ZimbabweRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of post-surgical photobiomodulation therapy in dogs. METHODS: Twenty dogs were selected for elective gastropexy and randomly divided into a control (CG, n = 10) and a PBMT group (PBMTG, n = 10). Premedication consisted of medetomidine and butorphanol. Meloxicam was administered before the procedure. Induction was performed with propofol and maintained with sevoflurane. Local blocks with lidocaine were used. Incisional gastropexy was performed in all animals. PBMTG received PBMT immediately after surgery. The need for postoperative rescue analgesia, if the animal had eaten by the evaluation momen, and pain scores were collected using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale - Short Form (CMPSSF) at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h postendotracheal extubation. CMPSSF scores were compared with the Mann-Whitney Test and proportions of animals that required rescue analgesia and had eaten with a χ2 test. P was set at < 0.05. RESULTS: No rescue analgesia was needed for any animal. Still, significant differences were observed in CMPS-SF scores between CG and PBMTG between 1 and 4 h post-extubation. PBMTG had a significantly higher proportion of animals eating up to the 8 h post-extubation evaluation moment. CONCLUSION: Adding post-surgical photobiomodulation to a standard anesthesia and analgesia protocol reduced CMPS-SF scores and increased the proportion of animals that resumed eating compared to the standard protocol alone.
Asunto(s)
Dilatación Gástrica , Gastropexia , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Vólvulo Gástrico , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad/veterinaria , Gastropexia/veterinaria , Animales , Perros , Dilatación Gástrica/cirugía , Vólvulo Gástrico/cirugía , Medetomidina/administración & dosificación , Meloxicam/administración & dosificación , Butorfanol/administración & dosificación , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Sevoflurano/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anestesia , Analgesia , Dimensión del Dolor/veterinaria , Analgésicos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ketamine is recognized as an alternative for pain management; however, concerns about emergent adverse reactions have limited its widespread adoption. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a short infusion of low-dose ketamine (LDK) compared to intravenous morphine (MOR) as adjunctive analgesia for acute long bone fracture pain. METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a single emergency department. Patients with acute long bone fractures and numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores ≥ 6 following an initial dose of intravenous morphine were assigned to receive either a LDK (0.3 mg/kg) over 15 min or intravenous MOR at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg administered over 5 min. Throughout a 120-min observation period, patients were regularly evaluated for pain level (0-10), side effects, and the need for additional rescue analgesia. RESULTS: A total of 58 subjects participated, with 27 in the MOR group and 31 in the LDK group. Demographic variables and baseline NRS scores were comparable between the MOR (8.3 ± 1.3) and LDK (8.9 ± 1.2) groups. At 30 min, the LDK group showed a significantly greater mean reduction in NRS scores (3.1 ± 2.03) compared to the MOR group (1.8 ± 1.59) (p = 0.009). Similarly, at 60 min, there were significant differences in mean NRS score reductions (LDK 3.5 ± 2.17; MOR mean reduction = 2.4, ± 1.84) with a p-value of 0.04. No significant differences were observed at other time intervals. The incidence of dizziness was higher in the LDK group at 19.4% (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Short infusion low-dose ketamine, as an adjunct to morphine, is effective in reducing pain during the initial 30 to 60 min and demonstrated comparability to intravenous morphine alone in reducing pain over the subsequent 60 min for acute long bone fractures. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of dizziness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NMRR17318438970 (2 May 2018; www.nmrr.gov.my ).
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas Óseas , Ketamina , Morfina , Humanos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto , Infusiones Intravenosas , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Dimensión del Dolor , Quimioterapia Combinada , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , AncianoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare compliance with the French national guidelines before and after the implementation (in 2018) of a new protocol on acute fracture pain management in the pediatric emergency department of a French university medical center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, before-after study in patients aged below 16 years presenting at the pediatric emergency department with a fracture. We compared pain management before (in 2017) and after (in 2019 and 2020) implementation of the new procedure. The primary endpoint was appropriate pain management, defined as (i) an appropriate initial assessment of pain, (ii) appropriate treatment with analgesic drugs (acetaminophen for mild pain, acetaminophen and ibuprofen for moderate pain, ibuprofen and morphine for severe pain) and (iii) reassessment of the pain intensity. RESULTS: 572 patients were included (mean age: 6.5 years; male: 60%). 190 in 2017 and 382 in 2019-2020. Pain management was appropriate for 40% of the patients in 2017 and 52% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.004). Pain was rated for 98% of patients in 2017 vs. 100% in 2019-2020 (p = 0.04). The frequency of appropriate treatment for mild pain and moderate pain increased significantly from 52 to 76% and from 0 to 44%, respectively. The administration of ibuprofen increased by 26% points (from 3 to 20 patients treated) and the administration of morphine increased by 29% points (from 1 to 17 patients treated). Pain reassessment rose significantly from 21 to 43%. Levels of compliance with the guidelines were similar in 2019 and 2020. Analgesia was significantly more effective in 2019-2020 than in 2017 (in 20% vs. 14% of the patients, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: After the implementation of a new protocol for the management of acute fracture pain, we observed an increase in compliance with the guidelines. Although the use of ibuprofen and morphine rose significantly as did the frequency of pain reassessment, further improvements are required.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Fracturas Óseas , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Preescolar , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Adolescente , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Ibuprofeno/administración & dosificación , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz , Morfina/uso terapéutico , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Francia , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Lactante , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Gabapentin is used in goats to treat chronic pain associated with lameness. However, pharmacokinetic data and clinical effectiveness trials are lacking. The objective of the study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin in goats following a single oral dose. Six Spanish-crossbred goats were enrolled. Each goat was administered gabapentin at a target dose of 15 mg/kg per os. Serial blood samples were collected out to 60 h post-gabapentin administration for plasma gabapentin concentration determination. Plasma samples were analyzed for gabapentin concentration using ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectroscopy. Individual animal pharmacokinetic outcomes were determined using non-compartmental analysis. Gabapentin was detectable in the plasma of all goats at 60 h post-administration. The mean (±SD) Cmax was 2.01 ± 0.62 µg/mL which occurred at 8.47 ± 1.9 h. The mean terminal half-life (T1/2) and mean resident time were determined to be 8.52 ± 1.8 and 18.7 ± 4.0 h, respectively. This study indicates gabapentin is absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract of goats. Further research is needed to determine an optimal dose for clinical efficacy in goats.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos , Gabapentina , Cabras , Animales , Gabapentina/farmacocinética , Gabapentina/administración & dosificación , Gabapentina/sangre , Semivida , Administración Oral , Analgésicos/farmacocinética , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/sangre , Masculino , Femenino , Área Bajo la CurvaRESUMEN
Ketamine is an injectable anesthetic agent with analgesic and antidepressant effects that can prevent maladaptive pain. Ketamine is metabolized by the liver into norketamine, an active metabolite. Prior rodent studies have suggested that norketamine is thought to contribute up to 30% of ketamine's analgesic effect. Ketamine is usually administered as an intravenous (IV) bolus injection or continuous rate infusion (CRI) but can be administered subcutaneously (SC) and intramuscularly (IM). The Omnipod® is a wireless, subcutaneous insulin delivery device that adheres to the skin and delivers insulin as an SC CRI. The Omnipod® was used in dogs for postoperative administration of ketamine as a 1 mg/kg infusion bolus (IB) over 1 hour (h). Pharmacokinetics (PK) showed plasma ketamine concentrations between 42 and 326.1 ng/mL. The median peak plasma concentration was 79.5 (41.9-326.1) ng/mL with a Tmax of 60 (30-75) min. After the same infusion bolus, the corresponding norketamine PK showed plasma drug concentrations between 22.0 and 64.8 ng/mL. The median peak plasma concentration was 43.0 (26.1-71.8) ng/mL with a median Tmax of 75 min. The median peak ketamine plasma concentration exceeded 100 ng/mL in dogs for less than 1 h post infusion. The Omnipod® system successfully delivered subcutaneous ketamine to dogs in the postoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Ketamina , Animales , Perros , Ketamina/farmacocinética , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/análogos & derivados , Ketamina/sangre , Masculino , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/veterinaria , Femenino , Analgésicos/farmacocinética , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos/sangre , Área Bajo la Curva , SemividaRESUMEN
The emerging field of nanotechnology has paved the way for revolutionary advancements in drug delivery systems, with nanosystems emerging as a promising avenue for enhancing the therapeutic potential and the stability of various bioactive compounds. Among these, cannabidiol (CBD), the non-psychotropic compound of the Cannabis sativa plant, has gained attention for its therapeutic properties. Consequently, researchers have devoted significant efforts to unlock the full potential of CBD's clinical benefits, where various nanosystems and excipients have emerged to overcome challenges associated with its bioavailability, stability, and controlled release for its transdermal application. Therefore, this comprehensive review aims to explain CBD's role in managing acute inflammatory pain and offers an overview of the state of the art of existing delivery systems and excipients for CBD. To summarize this review, a summary of the cannabinoids and therapeutical targets of CBD will be discussed, followed by its conventional modes of administration. The transdermal route of administration and the current topical and transdermal delivery systems will also be reviewed. This review will conclude with an overview of in vivo techniques that allow the evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic potentials of these systems.