Comparative study of coronary artery bypass grafting combined with off-pump mitral valvuloplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting alone in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Whether mitral surgery should be performed simultaneously with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation (MIMR) is controversial. This study was performed to introduce a method of off-pump mitral valvuloplasty after off-pump CABG (OPCABG) and compare it with OPCABG alone. METHODS: Eighty-three patients with MIMR underwent OPCABG. Among them, 21 patients (Group A) underwent posterior mitral annuloplasty without cardiopulmonary bypass, and 62 patients (Group B) underwent OPCABG alone. The primary endpoint of follow-up was the mitral regurgitation area. RESULTS: The mean mitral regurgitant area in Group A and B was 6.42 ± 1.02 and 5.49 ± 1.24 cm2 preoperatively (p = .479), 2.93 ± 1.35 and 3.28 ± 1.93 cm2 at 1 week postoperatively (p = .516), 3.06 ± 2.16 and 3.09 ± 1.85 cm2 at 3 months postoperatively (p = .839), and 3.02 ± 1.60 and 3.7 cm2 (median) at 1 year postoperatively (p = .043). There was less regurgitation in Group A at the mid-term. Intragroup comparison showed significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative values in both groups, with no difference in the regurgitant area at each postoperative time point in Group A but a significant difference between 3 months and 1 year postoperatively in Group B (p = .042). Multiple linear regression showed that the mid-term mitral regurgitant area changes were negatively correlated with graft flow and positively correlated with age. CONCLUSION: In patients with MIMR who underwent OPCABG plus off-pump mitral valve annuloplasty, the mitral regurgitant area was smaller and mitral regurgitation recurrence was less frequent at the mid-term follow-up.

Current Indications for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Using Transcatheter Aortic Valves: Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-Mitral Annulus Calcification.

Use of transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice is limited to patients with failing bioprostheses and rings or mitral valve disease associated with severe mitral annulus calcification. Whereas the use of valve-in-valve TMVR appears to be a reasonable alternative to surgery in patients at high surgical risk, much less evidence supports valve-in-ring and valve-in-mitral annulus calcification interventions. Data on the results of TMVR in these settings are derived from small case series or voluntary registries. This review summarizes the current evidence on TMVR using transcatheter aortic valves in clinical practice from the characteristics of the TMVR candidates, screening process, performance of the procedure, and description of current results and future perspectives. TMVR using dedicated devices in native noncalcified mitral valve diseases is beyond the scope of the article.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement: Rationale and Current Status.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent form of moderate or severe valve disease in the developed world. MR can result from impairment of any part of the mitral valve apparatus and is classified as primary (disease of the leaflets) or secondary (functional). The presence of at least moderate MR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. With the goal of avoiding the risks of traditional surgery, transcatheter mitral valve therapies have been developed. The current transcatheter repair techniques are limited by therapeutic target and incomplete MR reduction, and thus transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) has been pursued. Several devices (both transapical and transseptal) are under development, with both early feasibility and pivotal trials under way. As this field develops, the decision to treat with TMVR will require a heart team approach that takes patient-, disease-, and device-specific factors into account.

The impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair on mitral valve annular geometry.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is becoming increasingly common to treat severe mitral regurgitation. However, the lack of concomitant annuloplasty raises concerns regarding its durability. As a result, there is an emerging body of literature evaluating the impacts of TEER on mitral annular geometry. In this review, we summarize the most recent literature evaluating the impacts of TEER on annular geometry in the acute, intermediate and long-term. We also review the relationship between changes in annular geometry and clinical endpoints. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence suggests that TEER acutely induces favourable changes in mitral annular size and shape, which may persist for at least up to 1 year. Few studies suggest that TEER-induced annular remodelling is associated with positive clinical outcomes. SUMMARY: The current body of literature is sparse and limited to primarily small case series. Data from the surgical literature suggest that ringless edge-to-edge repair is associated with eventual failure. Unfortunately, few studies evaluate TEER-induced annular changes beyond the acute postprocedural phase. Future research needs to focus on and evaluate the significance of TEER-induced changes in annular dimensions in the long-term.

Mitral valve edge-to-edge repair versus indirect mitral valve annuloplasty in atrial functional mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare indirect mitral annuloplasty using the Carillon Mitral Contour System and edge-to-edge repair via MitraClip in atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR). BACKGROUND: In patients with left ventricular dilation, both edge-to-edge repair and indirect mitral annuloplasty are effective in reducing mitral regurgitation, while no clinical trial has compared both interventional methods in aFMR. METHODS: In a retrospective single-center analysis, 41 patients with aFMR underwent either edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (MitraClip group, n = 20) or indirect annuloplasty (Carillon group, n = 21). RESULTS: Both treatment groups showed high procedural success (100%) and low complication rates. Both treatment groups showed a comparable reduction of New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification postimplantation, after 3- and 12-months follow-up. Quantitative reduction in echocardiographic FMR parameters was significantly pronounced in the MitraClip group (reduction in vena contracta MitraClip vs. Carillon: postimplantation -74.6 ± 25.8 vs. -29.1 ± 17.8%, 3-months follow-up -65.8 ± 31.2 vs. -33.9 ± 17.5%, 12-months follow-up -50.8 ± 27.9 vs. -23.9 ± 17.0%, p < 0.05). Qualitative mitral valve assessment showed improved FMR class postimplantation, at 3-and 12-months follow-up in both treatment groups. Edge-to-edge repair revealed better results with lower average FMR classification compared to indirect coronary sinus-based annuloplasty. After 12-months left atrial (LA) volume was significantly reduced in the Carillon group, while in the MitraClip group no LA remodeling was found (reduction in LA volume MitraClip vs. Carillon at 12 months: +9.6 ± 25.1% vs. -12.3 ± 12.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both indirect mitral valve annuloplasty and edge-to-edge repair are feasible and safe in patients with aFMR, while the reduction in FMR was pronounced in the edge-to-edge repair group.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions for Mitral Regurgitation: A Review of Mitral Annuloplasty, Valve Replacement, and Chordal Repair Devices.

Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvular disease in the United States in patients older than 75. However, many patients with severe MR are at a high risk for surgical repair due to other significant comorbidities. Over the past decade, many transcatheter mitral valve devices have been studied that address the different mechanisms of MR, but only a few have received a Conformité Européene (CE) mark or United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. The Carillon, Cardioband, and Mitralign all received CE marking for percutaneous mitral annuloplasty, while the Tendyne and SAPIEN 3 received a CE mark and FDA approval, respectively, for transcatheter mitral valve replacement. Finally, the NeoChord DS 1000 received a CE mark for transcatheter chordal repair. Each of these devices is reviewed in detail, including device indications, performance in clinical trials, anesthetic management, intraprocedural imaging guidance, and postprocedural complications. Although percutaneous devices will appear and disappear from use, understanding the procedural considerations remains highly relevant, as these key principles will apply to the next generation of transcatheter valve interventions.

Echocardiographic Assessment of the Mitral Valve for Suitability of Repair: An Intraoperative Approach From a Mitral Center.

Intraoperative echocardiography of the mitral valve in the precardiopulmonary bypass period is an integral part of the surgical decision-making process for assessment of suitability for repair. Although there are comprehensive reviews in the literature regarding echocardiographic examination of the mitral valve, the authors present a practical stepwise algorithmic workflow to make objective recommendations. Advances in echocardiography allow for quantitative geometric analyses of the mitral valve, along with precise assessment of the valvular apparatus with three-dimensional echocardiography. In the precardiopulmonary bypass period, echocardiographers are required to diagnose and quantify valvular dysfunction, assess suitability for repair, assist in annuloplasty ring sizing, and determine the success or failure of the surgical procedure. In this manuscript the authors outline an algorithmic approach to intraoperative echocardiography examination using two-dimensional and three-dimensional modalities to objectively analyze mitral valve function and assist in surgical decision-making.

Robotic-assisted beating heart mitral valve surgery: Preliminary report.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic mitral valve surgery is a challenging issue, particularly in patients who are not suitable for aortic cross-clamping. In this study, we aimed to determine the feasibility and benefits of robotic, beating heart mitral valve surgery. METHODS: From February 2019 to February 2022, 17 patients underwent robotic beating heart mitral valve surgery. Fourteen of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. The mean age was 58.1 ± 10.3. Dense periaortic adhesions, heavily calcified aorta, and low ejection fraction were retained as indications for beating heart surgery. RESULTS: Mitral valve replacement was performed in 14 patients. Mitral ring annuloplasty was performed in two patients with low ejection fraction (EF). A severe paravalvular leak was repaired in one patient. Additional tricuspid annuloplasties were performed in three patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass time were 185.6 ± 55 min. There were no cases of conversion to sternotomy or thoracotomy. No cerebrovascular event occurred in the follow-up. One patient died as a result of secondary hepatorenal syndrome and multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic beating heart mitral valve surgery is a feasible and effective technique with favorable early and mid-term results, especially in patients who are not suitable for aortic cross-clamping, secondary to periaortic adhesions, severe aortic calcifications, and low ejection fraction.

Mitral valve repair or replacement. How long is this feud to last?

Choosing to perform mitral valve (MV) repair or replacement remains a hot and highly debated topic. The current guidelines seem to be conflicting in this specific field and the evidence at our disposal are scarce, only one small randomized trial and few larger retrospective studies. The meta-analysis by Gamal and coworkers tries to summarize the current evidence, concluding that MV replacement for the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is at least as safe as repair and certainly offers a more stable result over time than the latter. Obviously, the implantation of a prosthesis, especially a mechanical one, brings with it a series of problems, such as anticoagulation and, above all, a possible lack of ventricular remodeling, especially if a chordal sparing replacement is not performed. It must be said, on the other hand, that isolated annuloplasty cannot act as a counterpart to replacement, because ischemic MR cannot be considered only an annular disease. Therefore, wanting to mimic the nature that, after an infarction, enacts a series of changes involving also the mitral leaflets and chordae, the surgeons are called to act also on these two entities and not only to downsize the annulus. In a nutshell, a procedure should not be opposed in a fundamentalist way to another one, but we must accept the concept of armamentarium where both procedures are present and tail on the single patient, and also on the surgeon's expertize, the technique guaranteeing the best possible result.

Transapical mitral valve repair procedures: Primetime for microinvasive mitral valve surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays micro-invasive-procedures (off-pump, beating-heart) for mitral valve repair (MVRe) are abruptly expanding with the potential to be adopted as a valuable alternative to surgery. In the present manuscript, the authors review the available technologies intended to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) through transapical approach, including annuloplasty and chordal-repair options. ANNULOPLASTY: To date, Valcare Amend is the only transapical MV ring to have been implanted in patients. The device allows for stabilization of the annulus through a complete semirigid d-shaped ring. The first-in-human successful procedure was performed in 2016 by our Group and subsequent clinical experience included a total of 14 implanted patients. Currently, the technology is under clinical trial evaluation to validate the efficacy and safety profile of the device. CHORDAL REPAIR: Beating-heart chordal implantation via transapical approach is a current feasible, safe and reproducible option. Neochord DS1000 is the most widely used technology in the field, with a solid procedural experience and good results in well-selected patients. Its clinical use has been validated in Europe since 2012, while it is still under clinical investigation in the United States. Harpoon MVRe system is a novel technology, recently CE-mark approved for clinical use. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Transapical micro-invasive technologies are current viable therapies to treat MR in selected patients. Although there are still several limitations that preclude an extensive use of such procedures, their results are promising in well-selected patients. Embracing transcatheter MVRe therapies should guide the cardiac surgeon through the new revolution of micro-invasive MV tailored repair.

3D mitral annulus echocardiography assessment in patients affected by degenerative mitral regurgitation who underwent mitral valve repair with flexible band.

BACKGROUND: Degenerative mitral valve (MV) regurgitation (DMR) shows significative mitral annulus (MA) alterations; mitral valve repair (MVR) seeks to restore annular geometry and function, and the current use of flexible band seams to respect most annular mobility reducing parietal stress. Parameters of MV geometry obtained by 3D transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TTE) analysis are crucial for surgical planning and postoperative success. The aim of this study was to assess, by means of a dedicated software, the variations of MA geometry and function in patients affected by DMR compared to controls and after MVR with flexible band. METHODS: We enrolled 32 patients (cases) with severe DMR who underwent MVR using flexible band; we compare this group with 20 controls. The TEE with 3D MV images acquisition was performed in both groups and then analyzed in postprocessing by using a dedicated software. RESULTS: There were no anthropometrics differences between cases and controls, both presented normal left ventricular ejection fraction. DMR group showed a significant increase of annulus dimensional parameters (p = .001) and alteration of nonplanarity comparing to controls (p < .05). The annuloplasty with flexible band induces a considerable reduction of MV dimensions comparing to preoperative data and restores physiological mobility and nonplanarity. There were no statistical differences between postoperative DMR and controls data, except for nonplanarity parameters (p ~.05), maybe influenced by hemodynamic settings. CONCLUSIONS: MVR with annuloplasty using flexible band appears able to reinstate a more physiological anatomic conformation of the MA, without compromising its dynamic properties.

Aortomitral angle affects cardiovascular events after mitral valve repair for atrial functional mitral regurgitation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the geometric parameters of the aortomitral (AM) complex affecting postoperative cardiovascular events (CVEs) in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (MR). METHODS: From October 2008 to August 2018, we performed mitral and tricuspid valve repairs in 58 patients with atrial functional MR. We examined the determinants of CVEs using preoperative and postoperative echocardiographic data. Furthermore, we analyzed the effect of left atrial (LA) plication on AM geometries after surgery. The follow-up period ranged from 56 to 3283 days (median, 1073 days). RESULTS: All patients underwent mitral and tricuspid annuloplasty. Seventeen patients (29%) underwent additional LA plication. The AM angle was narrowed after surgery in patients with CVEs (115° ± 6.8° to 106° ± 4.2°, p = .00336), whereas it widened in patients without CVEs (115° ± 7.4° to 118° ± 8.4°, p = .0278). The postoperative AM angle was an independent predictor of postoperative CVEs (p = .000829). LA plication was not a predictor of CVEs; however, it was a predictor of the obtuse postoperative AM angle (p = .0071). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a narrow postoperative AM angle is an independent predictor of postoperative CVEs. Additional LA plication reduces the sharpening of the AM angle, which may prevent CVEs after mitral valve repair for atrial functional MR.

A new technique to adjust the length of artificial chordae during mitral anterior leaflet repair.

BACKGROUND: Length measurement of artificial chordae remains a critical step during mitral valve repair (MVr). The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a new length measuring technique. METHODS: All consecutive patients with anterior leaflet prolapse/flail who underwent MVr using the described method between January 2020 and January 2022 at our institution were included in the analysis. Clinical and transesophageal echocardiography data were collected postoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was freedom from mitral regurgitation (MR). Secondary outcomes were presentation with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class <2 and leaflet coaptation length ≥10 mm. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 16 (64%) were males. A total of 15 (60%) had isolated anterior leaflet disease, while 10 (40%) had concomitant posterior involvement. Twenty patients with isolated MR (80%) underwent right anterior mini-thoracotomy, while 5 (20%) with associated valvular or coronary disease underwent sternotomy. The median number of chordae implanted was 2 [1-4]. Postrepair intraoperative MR grade was 0 in 23 patients (92%) and 1 in 2 (8%). Thirty-day mortality was 0%. De novo atrial fibrillation was 20%. At follow-up, mortality was 0%. No patients presented with moderate or severe MR. A total of 22 patients (88%) were in NYHA class I, while 3 (12%) in class II. The coaptation length was 11 ± 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term outcomes of the described technique are good with adequate leaflet coaptation in all treated patients. Long-term results are needed to assess the stability and durability of this repair technique.

Partial ring annuloplasty in the management of mitral annular calcification.

Mitral annular calcification (MAC) complicates the management of mitral valve (MV) disease, regardless of its etiology. Strategies to address MV surgery in MAC include two main options with their own pros and cons; respect and resect strategy. Here, we present a case of minimally-invasive MV repair with partial annuloplasty in the management of noncircumferential MAC with respect to strategy. This technique may be an alternative option for rescuing high-risk patients without extensive decalcification.

Initial experience with percutaneous mitral valve repair in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is a therapeutic option for severe mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure due to differential aetiologies. However, only little is known about the safety and efficacy of this procedure in patients with amyloid cardiomyopathy. METHODS: Five patients with cardiac amyloidosis and moderate to severe or severe MR undergoing PMVR were analysed retrospectively and compared to seven patients with cardiac amyloidosis and severe MR without intervention. Clinical and functional data, renal function and cardiac biomarkers as well as established risk scores for cardiac amyloidosis were assessed. Primary endpoint was the reduction in MR one year after PMVR. Secondary endpoints were safety, overall mortality after 12 months compared with the control group, as well as changes in clinical and functional parameters. RESULTS: Amyloidosis risk assessment documented amyloid cardiomyopathy at an advanced stage in all patients. Procedural, technical and device success of PMVR were all 100% and residual MR remained mild to moderate at 12 months follow-up (P = .038 vs before PMVR). Differences in survival compared with the control (no PMVR) group pointed to a possible survival benefit in the PMVR group (P = .02). CONCLUSION: PMVR is a feasible and safe procedure in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and might carry a possible survival benefit in this patient group.

Early and Mid-Term Results After Repair of Ischaemic Mitral Regurgitation with Complete Annuloplasty Ring and Incomplete Ring.

BACKGROUND: The choice of ring type for mitral valve (MV) repair is still debatable and usually is left to the surgeon's discretion. AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the early and mid-term results after repair of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (MR) with complete and incomplete annuloplasty rings. METHODS: Collected data included preoperative assessment (age, sex, comorbidities, clinical status, NYHA grade, and the EURO score); intraoperative details (echocardiography, degree of MR, and cross-clamp time); and results (the length of ICU and hospital stay, duration and need for inotropes, duration of mechanical ventilation, and postoperative adverse events). Follow up after discharge included assessment of dyspnea status, the degree and progression of MR, and left ventricular function and dimensions. RESULTS: The present study included 133 patients: 61 with incomplete rings and 72 with complete rings inserted. There was no significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications between the two groups, apart from a significantly higher percentage of patients with incomplete ring who required prolonged ventilation >24 hours (P = 0.002). There were no significant differences between the two groups, regarding the grade of residual MR (P = 0.464), postoperative dyspnea status (P = 0.723), 30-day mortality rate (P = 0.687), and mean duration of survival (P = 0.276). CONCLUSION: The choice of incomplete or complete annuloplasty ring was not associated with a marked difference in the early and midterm results of ischaemic MV repair.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair for Standalone Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Chronic secondary mitral valve regurgitation is associated with a poor prognosis. Yet, in contrast to primary mitral regurgitation, there is no clear evidence that a reduction in regurgitation improves survival. The limited availability of data regarding secondary mitral regurgitation has resulted in a low level of evidence for treatment recommendations. We evaluated the influence of minimally invasive mitral valve annuloplasty on survival, freedom from recurrent regurgitation, and other echocardiographic parameters in patients with "standalone" secondary mitral valve regurgitation. METHODS: The analysis included patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation, left ventricular function <40%, and persistent symptoms, despite optimal medical therapy. We excluded patients who were eligible for coronary artery revascularisation or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (i.e., not standalone mitral regurgitation). After discharge, patients were scheduled for outpatient clinic follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018, 54 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve annuloplasty for severe standalone secondary mitral regurgitation. All patients were discharged with no or trivial residual regurgitation. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.5±16.8 months. Overall survival was 90% at 4 years postprocedure. Freedom from moderate regurgitation or reintervention was 89% at the 4-year follow-up. There was a low incidence of readmission for heart failure and patients showed consistent improvements in left ventricular function and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve repair with reduction and stabilisation of the annulus may be beneficial for symptomatic patients with secondary stand-alone mitral regurgitation.

Haemodynamics of an iatrogenic atrial septal defect after MitraClip implantation.

BACKGROUND: The MitraClip procedure requires transseptal access of the left atrium with a 24F guiding sheath. We evaluated invasively whether a MitraClip induced iatrogenic atrial septal defect (IASD) leads to development of a relevant interatrial shunt and right ventricular overload. METHODS: A total of 69 patients who underwent a MitraClip procedure due to a severe mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) were included in the observational, retrospective cohort study. All pressures were directly measured throughout the procedure. Cardiac index (CI), systemic (Qs) and pulmonary (Qp) flow were calculated using the Fick method. RESULTS: Successful MitraClip implantation increased CI (2.5 ± 0.62 vs 3.05 ± 0.77 L/min/m2 ; P < .0001), whereas SVR (1491 ± 474 vs 997 ± 301 dyn s/cm5 ; P < .0001), PVR (226 ± 121 vs 188 ± 96 dyn/s/cm5 ; P = .04), PCWP (23 ± 6.1 vs 20 ± 4.7 mm Hg; P = .0031), PA pressure (33.6 ± 7.2 vs 31.9 ± 6.6 mm Hg; P = .1437) and LA pressure (21.5 ± 5.4 vs 18.7 ± 4.9 mm Hg; P < .0001) all decreased. The effect on LA pressure was further enhanced by guiding catheter retrieval (14.4 ± 4.6 mm Hg; P < .0001). At the end of the procedure, Qp (6.033 ± 1.3 L/min) exceeded Qs (5.537 ± 1.3 L/min) by 0.496 L/min leading to a Qp:Qs ratio of 1.09 (P = .007). After 6 months, echocardiography revealed no changes in RV diameter (42.96 ± 6.95 mm vs 43.81 ± 7.67 mm; P = .62) and TAPSE (17.13 ± 3.33 mm vs 17.36 ± 3.24 mm; P = .48). CONCLUSION: Our data show that the MitraClip procedure does not induce a relevant interatrial shunt or right ventricular overload. In fact, future studies will have to show whether the IASD may even be beneficial in selected patient populations by left atrial volume and pressure relief.

Feasibility and rationale of direct current cardioversion immediately after transcatheter percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent comorbidity among patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Direct current (DC) cardioversion is one of the strategies for rhythm control. However, the safety and feasibility of immediate DC cardioversion after MitraClip are not elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, patients with symptomatic severe MR who underwent MitraClip were included. After fixing the MR, synchronized DC cardioversion was attempted for those with AF. A total of consecutive 60 patients, 36 subjects (60%), comorbid with AF. DC cardioversion was performed in 30 patients (mean age of 76.0 ± 9.3 years), and the successful conversion was achieved in 15 patients (50%). There was no any adverse event related to the cardioversion. Subjects with sustained conversion to SR experienced significant improvement in 6MWT (failed: 285 ± 110-308 ± 135 m, P = .278; successful: 269 ± 109 m-328 ± 78, P = .047) and reduction in NT-proBNP level (failed: 4411 ± 7401-3296 ± 4299 ng/mL, P = .217; successful: 4094 ± 2735-2353 ± 2856 ng/mL, P = .026) at 1 month. CONCLUSIONS: Direct current cardioversion seemed to be safe and feasible immediately after the transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repairs. Subjects who maintain SR experienced better functional improvement.

Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation Treatment Regimes in a Multicenter Cohort of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair Patients.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent comorbidity in patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Recent studies show a deleterious outcome of patients with concomitant AF after transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR). This underlines the essential need for additional strategies that ameliorate the prognosis of these patients. Fundamental data on AF characteristics and treatment regimes in this special cohort of patients are lacking. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 542 consecutive patients with severe MR undergoing TMVR in three tertiary heart centers with special focus on AF type and underlying treatment strategies. RESULTS: The prevalence of concomitant AF was 73.3%, and AF did not affect the procedural success or the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The patients with AF were more frequently >75 years, had more tricuspid regurgitation, and less coronary artery disease than non-AF patients. The distribution of AF types was 32% paroxysmal AF, 27% persistent AF, and 41% permanent AF. Except for a higher degree in severe tricuspid regurgitation and a higher likelihood of male sex, no substantial differences were observed while comparing permanent and nonpermanent AF patients. The predominant treatment regime was rate control (57%), with only beta blockers (BB) in the majority of persistent and permanent AF patients, while additional digitalis or a pacemaker was used infrequently. Rhythm control was mainly achieved with BB alone in paroxysmal AF patients and with additional antiarrhythmic drugs in the majority of persistent AF patients. Interventional rhythm control therapy was performed in 2.5% and 30.9% of paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, respectively. The guideline-adherent use of oral anticoagulants was comparable and high in both groups (91.9% in nonpermanent vs. 90.1% in permanent AF). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to provide necessary information for the understanding of the current clinical practice in dealing with TMVR patients. Since evidence suggests that AF is not a benign concomitant disease, further investigations are needed to assess the prognostic impact of these different AF treatment strategies.