RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A co-surgeon model is known to be favorable in microvascular breast reconstruction, but simultaneous co-surgeon deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cases have not been well-studied. The authors hypothesize that performing two simultaneous co-surgeon bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions results in non-inferior clinical outcomes and may improve patient access to care. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing record review to identify all cases of co-surgeon free-flap breast reconstructions over a 38-month period. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions with the same two co-surgeons were identified. The control group consisted of subjects who underwent non-simultaneous reconstruction by the same co-surgeons within the same, preceding, or following month of those in the study group. Primary outcome variables were 90-day postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes were operating time, ischemia time, and length of stay. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 137 subjects were identified and 64 met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 study, n = 36 control). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in body mass index, radiation, trainee experience, flap perforator number, immediate/delayed reconstruction, or length of stay. There were also no statistically significant differences in complications, including flap loss, anastomosis revision, take-back to the operating room, or re-admission. Operative time was longer in the simultaneous DIEP group (540.5 vs. 443.5 min, p < 0.01), but ischemia time was shorter in the simultaneous group (64.0 vs. 80.5 min, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A simultaneous co-surgeon approach to bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction may improve access to care and does not result in a higher complication rate compared with non-simultaneous bilateral DIEP flaps.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Arterias Epigástricas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Femenino , Mamoplastia/métodos , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tempo Operativo , Tiempo de Internación , Pronóstico , Cirujanos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y ControlesRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: This Editorial discusses the recent overturning of a proposed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services policy that reduced reimbursement for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. The authors highlight the importance of advocacy efforts in sustaining access to complex microsurgical procedures, even those under investigation such as breast reinnervation and lymphatic reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Anciano , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Medicaid , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Medicare , Mamoplastia/métodos , Poder PsicológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the setting of immediate breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, the excessive DIEP flap skin is de-epithelialized and then buried under the mastectomy skin. In this study, by virtue of tube flap technique, we hypothesize that the skin supposed to be abandoned could be transferred to the apex of reconstructed breast mound for nipple reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 60 female patients were recruited between January 2019 and December 2020. All these patients underwent mastectomy including nipple-areola complex and immediate DIEP flap breast reconstruction. A ladder-shaped pedicled flap was raised from the DIEP flap and rolled into a tube. The free end of tube flap was inset into the future nipple position of the reconstructed breast mound 1 week later. After revascularization for 1 month, we divided the previous pedicle and used the tube on the apex of the breast mound to recreate a new nipple. RESULTS: All reconstructed breasts and nipples survived well postoperatively. The average nipple projection was 12.5 ± 2.0 mm immediately after the surgery, which gradually decreased to 9.4 ± 1.5 mm at 1-year follow-up, with the projection loss from the initial measurement as 24.9% ± 1.8%. In total, 51 patients considered the overall impression of breast and nipple reconstruction to be very good or good. CONCLUSIONS: We provided an ideal technique that could improve the maintenance of reconstructed nipple projection and have aesthetically acceptable outcomes, without DIEP flap tissue loss, breast mound distortion, or additional scars.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Femenino , Humanos , Mastectomía/métodos , Pezones/cirugía , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mamoplastia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Tissue expander-based breast reconstruction is associated with high rates of infectious complications, often leading to tissue expander explants and delays in receipt of definitive breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy. In this study, we describe a single-stage technique where deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are used to salvage actively infected tissue expanders among patients originally planning for free flap reconstruction. METHODS: In this technique, patients with tissue expander infections without systemic illness are maintained on oral antibiotics until the day of their DIEP flap surgery, at which time tissue expander explant is performed in conjunction with aggressive attempt at total capsulectomy and immediate DIEP flap reconstruction. Patients are maintained on 1-2 weeks of oral antibiotics tailored to culture data. Patients undergoing this immediate salvage protocol were retrospectively reviewed, and complications and length of stay were assessed. RESULTS: In a retrospective series, a total of six consecutive patients with culture-proven tissue expander infections underwent tissue expander removal and DIEP flap reconstruction in a single stage and were maintained on 7-14 days of oral antibiotics postoperatively. Within this cohort, no surgical site infections, microvascular complications, partial flap losses, reoperations, or returns to the operating room were noted within a 90-day period. CONCLUSIONS: Among a select cohort of patients, actively infected tissue expanders may be salvaged with free flap breast reconstruction in a single surgery with a low incidence of postoperative complications. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the influence of this treatment strategy on costs, number of surgeries, and dissatisfaction after staged breast reconstruction complicated by tissue expander infections.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Epigástricas , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Terapia Recuperativa , Dispositivos de Expansión Tisular , Humanos , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arterias Epigástricas/trasplante , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Expansión de Tejido/métodos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Remoción de Dispositivos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is important to include as many perforators as possible in order to enhance the vascularity of a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. However, the rectus muscle must be transected transversely, which prevents suturing and can cause a defect along the same line as the muscle-sparing procedure. When harvesting the DIEP flap, no specific method was suggested to solve these muscle defects. We found that by transecting the rectus muscle transversely, the muscle could be sutured in the tendinous area more easily while maintaining muscle function. The purpose of this study is to confirm the long-term recovery of the rectus abdominis muscle through the volume change after DIEP flap using this tendinous transection and suture method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 28 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using a DIEP flap and the tendinous transection method for multiple perforators between May 2018 and April 2020 was conducted. The preoperative and postoperative volumes of the rectus abdominis muscle were estimated both the harvest and opposite sides. RESULTS: The preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the harvest side were 50.08 ± 8.71 cm3 and 48.56 ± 8.61 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 1.522 cm3 decrease, which was not statistically significant (p = .070). The preoperative and postoperative muscle volumes from the opposite side were 50.50 ± 8.15 cm3 and 50.08 ± 8.18 cm3, respectively. The volume difference was 0.434 cm3 increase and was not statistically significant (p = .064). Postoperative volume changes in the rectus muscle were not statistically significant on either side. CONCLUSION: The tendinous transection method in the DIEP flap procedure did not significantly affect postoperative rectus muscle volume. Therefore, we expect this harvest method to allow DIEP flap reconstruction that includes multiple perforators and complete donor muscle recovery.
Asunto(s)
Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Recto del Abdomen/trasplante , Mamoplastia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Músculos/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In breast reconstruction with free flaps, retrograde venous anastomosis into the internal mammary vein (IMV) is often unavoidable. Utility of a crossing vein between the right and left IMV, one of the anatomical foundations which make retrograde flow possible, has been reported but only with a few detailed features. This study evaluated the presence, actual location, and diameter of the crossing veins using preoperative imaging such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI). Moreover, this is a preliminary non-invasive study to clarify these processes on a larger scale. METHODS: We included 29 cases of unilateral breast reconstruction performed between July 2018 and September 2023 at our institution using unipedicled or bipedicled free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps with retrograde venous anastomosis to only one IMV at the level of anastomosis. No congestion or necrosis was observed. In the final 24 cases with sufficient imaging coverage of preoperative contrast-enhanced images (15 CECT and 9 CEMRI), the crossing veins of IMVs were detected and the number, localization, and diameter were measured. RESULTS: In 20 cases of 24 images, the crossing veins between IMVs were completely identified (83%). In 18 of the cases, only one crossing vein was established immediately ventral to the xiphoid process, averaging 19.3 ± 7.18 mm caudal to the fibrous junction between the sternal body and xiphoid process. The average diameter of the veins was 1.57 ± 0.42 mm. In two other cases, the second crossing vein originated on the dorsal surface of the sternum, but it was a very thin vein of about 0.4 mm. Three images indicated incomplete identification of the crossing vein at the xiphoid process, and in one case, no crossing vein was observed between bilateral IMVs. CONCLUSION: The contrast-enhanced imaging study revealed an anatomic feature that the crossing veins (about 1.5 mm in diameter) connecting the right and left IMVs are located just ventral to the xiphoid process. Furthermore, the crossing veins can be identified on contrast-enhanced images, and refinement of this method is expected to lead to future non-invasive anatomical investigations in an even larger number of cases.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Venas/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Arterias Epigástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: When choosing a method of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap for breast reconstruction, concerns regarding the potentially detrimental effects of obesity on postoperative recovery remain. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is known to facilitate rapid postoperative recovery. This study aimed to examine the effect of the ERAS protocol on the disparity between normal/underweight and overweight/obese patients after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between January 2015 and November 2022 was conducted. The patients were categorized into two groups: pre-ERAS and post-ERAS. In each group, associations between overweight/obese patients (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 ) and postoperative course were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 217 patients in the pre-ERAS group (including 71 overweight/obese) and 165 in the post-ERAS group (including 58 overweight/obese) were analyzed. The post-ERAS group had shorter length of stay (LOS) (8.0 versus 7.0 days, p-value <.001) and lower postoperative pain scores (5.0 versus 3.0 at postoperative day (POD) 1, p-value <.001) than the pre-ERAS group. The complication profiles did not differ according to ERAS adoption. In the pre-ERAS group, overweight/obese patients showed a significantly longer LOS (8.0 versus 9.0 days, p-value = .017) and a higher postoperative pain score (3.0 versus 4.0 at POD 2, p-value = .018) than normal/underweight patients; however, these differences disappeared in the post-ERAS group, showing similar LOS, pain scores, and analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the ERAS protocol in DIEP free-flap breast reconstruction may reduce overweight/obesity-related disparities in postoperative recovery.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/cirugía , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Delgadez/complicaciones , Delgadez/cirugía , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent CMS billing changes have raised concerns about insurance coverage for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. This study compared the costs and utilization of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), DIEP, and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in breast reconstruction. METHOD: The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to identify female patients who underwent DIEP, TRAM, and LD flap procedures from 2016 to 2019. Key data such as patient demographics, length of stay, complications, and costs (adjusted to 2021 USD) were analyzed, focusing on differences across the flap types. RESULTS: A total of 17,770 weighted patient encounters were identified, with the median age being 51. The majority underwent DIEP flaps (73.5%), followed by TRAM (14.2%) and LD (12.1%) flaps. The findings revealed that DIEP and TRAM flaps had a similar length of stay (LOS), while LD flaps typically had a shorter LOS. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio were also comparable between DIEP and TRAM flaps, whereas LD flaps were significantly less expensive. Factors such as income quartile, primary payer of hospitalization, and geographic region significantly influenced flap choice. CONCLUSION: The study's results appear to contradict the prevailing notion that TRAM flaps are more cost-effective than DIEP flaps. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio and hospital stays associated with TRAM and DIEP flaps were found to be similar. These findings suggest that changes in the insurance landscape, which may limit the use of DIEP flaps, could undermine patient autonomy while not necessarily reducing healthcare costs. Such policy shifts could favor less costly options like the LD flap, potentially altering the landscape of microvascular breast reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Mamoplastia/economía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Femenino , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Colgajo Perforante/economía , Colgajo Perforante/trasplante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Recto del Abdomen/trasplante , Recto del Abdomen/irrigación sanguínea , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/trasplante , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Colgajo Miocutáneo/trasplante , Colgajo Miocutáneo/economía , Colgajo Miocutáneo/irrigación sanguínea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Microcirugia/economía , Músculos Superficiales de la Espalda/trasplante , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite advances in perforator dissection, abdominal morbidity still occurs. Traditional rectus diastasis (RD), abdominal bulge, and hernia repair with open techniques are associated with higher complication rates and recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We present a novel case series of robotic repair of symptomatic RD and/or abdominal bulge with concurrent hernia following DIEP flap surgery. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted of 10 patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and subsequent robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge and hernia. Preoperative demographics and postoperative clinical outcomes were reviewed. RD up to 5 cm, abdominal bulge, and any concurrent ventral/umbilical hernias were repaired robotically with retrorectus plication and macroporous mesh reinforcement. RESULTS: The average age and BMI were 49 years (range 41-63) and 31â kg/m2 (range 26-44), respectively. The average number of perforators harvested per flap was 2.5 (range 1-4). Average RD and hernia size were 3.95â cm (range 2-5) and 5.8â cm2 (1-15), respectively. Eight patients stayed 1 night in the hospital, and 2 went home the same day as the robotic repair. No patients were converted to open technique and none experienced complications within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who experience donor site morbidity following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, minimally invasive robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge with hernia can be performed with mesh reinforcement. This technique is effective, with low complication rates, and should be considered over open repair.
Asunto(s)
Diástasis Muscular , Arterias Epigástricas , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Recto del Abdomen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Adulto , Colgajo Perforante/trasplante , Recto del Abdomen/cirugía , Recto del Abdomen/trasplante , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/trasplante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diástasis Muscular/cirugía , Diástasis Muscular/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Mallas QuirúrgicasRESUMEN
Deep burns sequelae involving the upper limb are challenging even for experienced surgeons, mainly because local reconstructive options and donor sites are often compromised. The use of free flaps for this type of reconstruction remains difficult due to the small recipient vessel diameter and tendency to vasospasm. Moreover, pediatric cases bring the challenge to another level. We present the case of a 13-year-old girl presenting major retractile sequelae of the upper left limb, including complete wrist immobilization combining wrist hyper-extension, ulnar deviation deformity, and a ulno-carpal dislocation. She was referred to our department where a two-stage reconstruction was performed using a pre-expanded free deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap. The first surgery consisted of placing two kidney-shaped expanders in a subfascial plane in the hypogastric region. Four months later, after a bi-weekly expansion, an excision of the scar tissue, and the DIEP flap transfer were completed. At the 12-month follow-up evaluation, both aesthetic and functional results were satisfactory, with a good contour and regained mobility of the wrist.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Femenino , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Quemaduras/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodosAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Arterias Epigástricas , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Pronóstico , Mastectomía/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Wide defects resulting from subtotal or total glossectomy are commonly reconstructed using a bulk flap to maintain oral and speech functions. The flap, including muscle tissue, diminishes with time. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap reconstructions after glossectomy with laryngeal preservation. METHODS: Medical records of 13 and 26 patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric artery perforator and rectus abdominis musculocutaneous free flap reconstructions, respectively, from 2014 to 2022 at our institution were reviewed. Patients who underwent middle pharynx resection except for the base of the tongue, mandibular bone resection, and sensory reinnervation were excluded. RESULTS: The rectus abdominis musculocutaneous groups showed a higher number of lymph node dissection and shorter operative time than the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator groups. No significant differences in postoperative complications or functional oral intake scale scores at 6 months were observed. Volumetric changes on computed tomography images at 6 and 12 months were significantly lower in the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator group. Cancer recurrence was significantly associated with reduced oral function. CONCLUSIONS: Oral function in patients with cancer is influenced by various other factors. However, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap may be suitable for tongue reconstruction because of the minimal postoperative changes in flap volume, easy adjustment of flap thickness, elevation of multiple flaps, and minimal complications at the donor site.
Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres , Mamoplastia , Neoplasias , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Glosectomía , Recto del Abdomen/trasplante , Neoplasias/cirugía , Colgajo Perforante/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIMS: To understand variation in the cost of autologous breast reconstruction in the UK, including identifying key areas of cost variability, differences between and within units and the impact of enhanced recovery protocols (ERAS). METHODS: A micro-costing study was designed based on the responses to a national survey of clinical preferences completed by the majority of plastic surgeons and anaesthetists involved in the UK. Detailed costs were estimated from macro elements such as ward and theatre running costs, down to that of surgical meshes, anaesthetic drugs and flap monitoring devices. RESULTS: The largest variation in cost arose from postoperative location and length of stay, preoperative imaging and flap monitoring strategies. Plastic surgeon costs varied from £1282 to £3141, whereas anaesthetic costs were between £32 and £151 (not including salary). Estimated cost variation within units was up to £893 per case. Units with ERAS had significantly lower total costs than those without (pâ¯<â¯0.05). CONCLUSION: This study reveals significant cost variation in breast reconstruction in the UK based on clinician preferences. Many areas of practice driving this variation lack strong evidence of any clinical advantage. The total cost of a deep inferior epigastric perforator in the majority, if not all units, likely surpasses the national tariff for reimbursement, particularly when considering additional resource demand for immediate and bilateral breast reconstruction, as well as future symmetrisation procedures. Whilst units should look to streamline costs through ERAS, there should also be a realistic tariff that promotes excellent care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Femenino , Mamoplastia/métodos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/cirugía , Reino Unido , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap is the gold standard procedure for autologous breast reconstruction. Although breast-related complications have been well described, donor-site complications and contributing patient risk factors are poorly understood. METHODS: We examined a multi-institutional, prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing DIEP free flap breast reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. We evaluated patient demographics, operative details, and abdominal donor-site complications. Logistic regression modeling was used to predict donor-site outcomes based on patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 661 patients were identified who underwent DIEP free flap breast reconstruction across multiple institutions. Using logistic regression modeling, we found that body mass index (BMI) was an independent risk factor for umbilical complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.11, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.18, p = 0.001), seroma (OR 1.07, CI 1.01-1.13, p = 0.003), wound dehiscence (OR 1.10, CI 1.06-1.15, p = 0.001), and surgical site infection (OR 1.10, CI 1.05-1.15, p = 0.001) following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Further, immediate reconstruction decreases the risk of abdominal bulge formation (OR 0.22, CI 0.108-0.429, p = 0.001). Perforator selection was not associated with abdominal morbidity in our study population. CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI is associated with increased abdominal donor-site complications following DIEP free flap breast reconstruction. Efforts to lower preoperative BMI may help decrease donor-site complications.
Asunto(s)
Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Abdomen/cirugía , Mama/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Colgajo Perforante/efectos adversos , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is an innovative modification of the traditional open preparation for autologous breast reconstruction. It is assumed that donor-site morbidity (herniae, bulging) is reduced by minimising the fascial incision length in robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest. MATERIAL & METHODS: This is the first report of a robotic-assisted DIEP harvest in Germany, which was performed in April 2023 at the University Hospital of Freiburg in an interdisciplinary approach of the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology. To determine the value of this novel technique, we assessed the demand by retrospectively performing an analysis of potential patients and conducted a cost analysis based on the breast reconstructions with DIEP flap harvest performed between April 2021 and May 2023 at the Department of Plastic Surgery at Freiburg University Hospital. To this end, we carried out a retrospective analysis of preoperative CT angiographies to determine the proportion of patients suitable for a robotic-assisted procedure in a post-hoc analysis. Furthermore, we describe the basic robotic-assisted techniques and discuss the TEP and TAPP laparoscopic approaches. RESULTS: In line with the previously published literature, a short intramuscular course (≤25 mm) and a perforator diameter of≥1.5 mm and≥2.7 mm (subgroup) were defined as a crucial condition for the robotic-assisted procedure. We analysed 65 DIEP flaps harvested in 51 patients, of which 26 DIEP flaps in 22 patients met both criteria, i. e.≤25 mm intramuscular course and≥1.5 mm diameter of the perforator, while 10 DIEP flaps in 10 patients additionally met the criteria of the subgroup (≥2.7 mm diameter). Based on the intramuscular course of the perforators in the CT angiographies of those 26 DIEP flaps, a potential reduction of the fascial incision of 96.8±25.21 mm (mean±standard deviation) compared with the conventional surgical approach was calculated. The additional material costs in our case were EUR 986.01. However, ischaemia time was 33,5 minutes longer than the median of the comparative cohort. CONCLUSION: The robotic-assisted procedure has already proven to be a feasible alternative in a suitable patient population. However, further studies are needed to confirm that robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest actually reduces harvest site morbidity and thereby justifies the additional costs and complexity.
Asunto(s)
Arterias Epigástricas , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Colgajo Perforante/trasplante , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Arterias Epigástricas/trasplante , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Colaboración Intersectorial , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Sitio Donante de Trasplante/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Implants and DIEP flaps have different outcomes regarding postoperative breast sensation. When compared to the preoperative healthy breast, implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) negatively influences postoperative breast sensation. However, it is currently unknown whether a prior IBBR also influences postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. The goal of this cohort study is to evaluate the influence of an IBBR on the postoperative sensation of a replacing DIEP flap. METHODS: Women were included if they received a DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy, with or without prior tissue expander (TE) and/or definitive breast implant. Sensation was measured at four intervals in 9 areas of the breast with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: T0 (preoperative, implant/no reconstruction), T1 (2-7 months postoperative, DIEP), T2 (± 12 months postoperative, DIEP), Tmax (maximum follow-up, DIEP). Linear mixed-effects models were used to investigate the relationship between an implant/TE prior to the DIEP flap and recovery of breast sensation. RESULTS: 142 women comprising 206 breasts were included. 48 (23.3%) breasts did, and 158 (76.7%) breasts did not have a TE/IBBR prior to their DIEP. No statistically significant or clinically relevant relationships were found between a prior implant/TE and recovery of DIEP flap breast sensation for the flap skin, native skin, or total breast skin at T1, T2, or Tmax. There were also no relationships found after adjustment for the confounders radiation therapy, BMI, diabetes, age, flap weight, follow-up, and nerve coaptation. CONCLUSIONS: An implant/TE prior to a DIEP flap does not influence the recovery of postoperative breast sensation of the DIEP flap.
Asunto(s)
Implantes de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Arterias Epigástricas , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Sensación , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Colgajo Perforante/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Mamoplastia/métodos , Adulto , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Sensación/fisiología , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Anciano , Periodo Posoperatorio , Mama/cirugía , Implantación de Mama/métodos , Implantación de Mama/efectos adversos , Implantación de Mama/instrumentaciónAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Colgajo Perforante , Humanos , Femenino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Índice de Masa Corporal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Colgajo Perforante/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Objective: to report the prevalence of arterial corona mortis and to describe its surgical and clinical applicabilities. Methods: We dissected 60 hemipelvises (50 men and 10 women) fixed in a 10% formalin solution for the purpose of gathering information on corona mortis. We measured the caliber and length of the obturator artery and its anastomotic branch with the aid of a digital caliper and submitted the data to statistical analyzes and comparisons with the GraphPad Prism 6 software. Results: arterial corona mortis was present in 45% of the studied sample. The most common origin of the obturator artery was the internal iliac artery; however, there was one exceptional case in which it originated from the femoral artery. The caliber of the anastomotic branch was on average 2.7mm, whereas the caliber of the obturator artery was 2.6mm. Conclusion: the vascular connections between the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac and inferior epigastric arterial systems are relatively common over the upper pubic branch. The diameter and a trajectory of the anastomotic artery may vary. Thus, iatrogenic lesions and pelvic and acetabular fractures can result in severe bleeding that puts the patient's life at risk.
RESUMO Objetivo: relatar a prevalência da corona mortis arterial e descrever suas aplicabilidades cirúrgicas e clínicas. Métodos: sessenta hemipelvises (50 homens e 10 mulheres) fixadas em uma solução de formalina a 10% foram dissecadas com o propósito de obter informações sobre a corona mortis. Medidas do calibre e comprimento da artéria obturatória e seu ramo anastomótico foram mensuradas com o auxílio de um paquímetro digital e submetidas a análises e comparações estatísticas no programa GraphPad Prism 6. Resultados: a corona mortis arterial esteve presente em 45% da amostra estudada. A origem mais comum da artéria obturatória foi da artéria ilíaca interna, porém, houve um caso excepcional no qual a artéria obturatória se originou da artéria femoral. O calibre do ramo anastomótico foi em média 2.7mm, enquanto que o calibre da artéria obturatória foi 2.6mm. Conclusão: as conexões vasculares entre os sistemas obturatório, ilíacos interno e externo e epigástrico inferior são relativamente comuns sobre o ramo superior da pube. O diâmetro e a trajetória dessa artéria anastomótica podem variar. Assim, lesões iatrogênicas, fraturas pélvicas e acetabulares podem resultar em hemorragias graves que colocam a vida do paciente em risco.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Arterias Epigástricas/anatomía & histología , Variación Anatómica , Arteria Ilíaca/anatomía & histología , Pelvis , Cadáver , Arterias Epigástricas/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIPoC) against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury on flaps of rats. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into the Sham, Control, RIPoC1 and RIPoC2 groups. All the animals were submitted to a 5×4 cm superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. Eight hours of flap ischemia was induced and two protocols of limb RIPoC were applied. Tissue MDA level and SOD activity in 24-h reperfusion were assessed. Flap survival was assessed 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: Compared to the Control group, the RIPoC1 group showed statistically decreased MDA level at 6-, 12-, and 24-h reperfusion (P = 0.01, P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively), and statistically increased SOD activity at 12- and 24-h reperfusion (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Flap survival rate on the 7th day was significantly higher in the RIPoC1 group than the control group (47.9 ± 6.4 vs . 29.4 ± 7.1 %, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Three cycles of 5-min Limb remote ischemic post-conditioning rather than a single cycle of 15-min limb RIPoC has protective effect on flaps against ischemia-reperfusion injury by attenuating oxidative stress.