Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.731
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Brain ; 147(4): 1312-1320, 2024 Apr 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864847

RESUMEN

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38), known for its role in migraine pathogenesis, has been identified as a novel drug target. Given the clinical parallels between post-traumatic headache (PTH) and migraine, we explored the possible role of PACAP-38 in the pathogenesis of PTH. To this end, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial involving adult participants diagnosed with persistent PTH resulting from mild traumatic brain injury. Participants were randomly assigned to receive a 20-min continuous intravenous infusion of either PACAP-38 (10 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (isotonic saline) on two separate experimental days, with a 1-week washout period in between. The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of migraine-like headache between PACAP-38 and placebo during a 12-h observational period post-infusion. The secondary outcome was the difference in the area under the curve (AUC) for baseline-corrected median headache intensity scores during the same 12-h observational period. Of 49 individuals assessed for eligibility, 21 were enrolled and completed the trial. The participants had a mean age of 35.2 years, and 16 (76%) were female. Most [19 of 21 (90%)] had a migraine-like phenotype. During the 12-h observational period, 20 of 21 (95%) participants developed migraine-like headache after intravenous infusion of PACAP-38, compared with two (10%) participants after placebo (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the baseline-corrected AUC values for median headache intensity scores during the 12-h observational period was higher after PACAP-38 than placebo (P < 0.001). These compelling results demonstrate that PACAP-38 is potent inducer of migraine-like headache in people with persistent PTH. Thus, targeting PACAP-38 signalling might be a promising avenue for the treatment of PTH.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Migrañosos , Cefalea Postraumática , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Cefalea Postraumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea Postraumática/diagnóstico , Cefalea Postraumática/etiología , Polipéptido Hipofisario Activador de la Adenilato-Ciclasa/uso terapéutico , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Método Doble Ciego
2.
Cephalalgia ; 44(3): 3331024231209326, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529897

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Visual snow syndrome comprises a whole-field static-like visual disturbance, with increased awareness of entopic phenomena, an inability to suppress the 'just seen' and photophobia. Visual snow syndrome is often associated with other problems such as headache, tinnitus, and anxiety. The earliest reported case of a patient experiencing symptoms consistent with visual snow syndrome dates only to 1995. This paper seeks to find patterns of experience in the medical literature of the past that are reminiscent of visual snow syndrome, to challenge the view that it is in any sense a novel disorder. Descriptions of subjective visual sensations such as experienced by patients suffering from visual snow syndrome were sought in treatises, textbooks and other literature generated by leading figures in 19th-century ophthalmology, physiology and physics. CONCLUSION: While retrospective diagnosis of modern illness categories in historical medical literature is an enterprise fraught with pitfalls, it is nonetheless possible to see patterns of experience in the 19th-century medical literature that are strongly reminiscent of visual snow syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Percepción , Trastornos de la Visión , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastornos de la Visión/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Percepción/complicaciones , Fotofobia , Cefalea/complicaciones
3.
Headache ; 64(2): 172-178, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38235911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stigmatization and trivialization of headache confront individuals with headache disorders, but the degree to which media may contribute is incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to quantify the frequency of disparaging metaphorical use of the words "headache" and "migraine" in articles and summaries of major publications. METHODS: This longitudinal study analyzed a dataset of 1.3 million articles and summaries written by authors and editors of 38 major publications. Data cover written publications from 1998 up to 2017. The use of the words "headache" or "migraine" in articles and summaries by major publications was rated by two authors (P.Z. and A.V.) as either "metaphorical" or "medical" based on their contextual application. Pearson's chi-squared test was applied to assess differences in the frequency of metaphorical use of "headache" in comparison to "migraine." Secondary outcomes were the source of publication and time of publication. RESULTS: A total of 6195 and 740 articles included the words "headache" or "migraine," respectively; 7100 sentences contained the word "headache" and 1652 sentences contained the word "migraine." Among a random sample of 1000 sentences with the word "headache," there was a metaphorical use in 492 (49.2% [95% CI, 46.1-52.3]) sentences. Among a random sample of 1000 sentences with the word "migraine," there was a metaphorical use in 45 (4.5% [95% CI, 3.2-5.8]) sentences. The five most prevalent sources were CNN, Fox News, The New York Times, The Guardian, and The Washington Post. There was an overall increase in the number of articles containing the words "headache" or "migraine" from database inception until analysis (1998 up to 2017). The database included no articles containing either "headache" or "migraine" in 1998; in 2016, this number was 1480 articles. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal study, major publications applied a metaphorical use of "headache" about half of the time. The metaphorical use of "headache" is 11-fold greater than the metaphorical use of "migraine" in the same media sample. These depictions may contribute to the trivialization of headache and the stigmatization of individuals with headache disorders. Studies with individuals affected by headache disorders are needed to clarify potential influences.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Cefalea/epidemiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/complicaciones , Proyectos de Investigación
4.
Headache ; 64(1): 48-54, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38238973

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors for developing persistent headache attributed to past ischemic stroke. BACKGROUND: Although the most recent International Classification of Headache Disorders has recognized the existence of persistent headache attributed to past ischemic stroke, there has been limited research in this area. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. We initially assessed patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke admitted within 72 h of symptom onset. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. These patients were re-interviewed by telephone 1 year after the stroke. Semi-structured questionnaires, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and six-item Headache Impact Test were used. RESULTS: A total of 119 participants answered the interview conducted 1 year after the stroke. The mean (standard deviation) age was 64 (13.1) years, 82/119 (68.9%) were female, and the median (interquartile range) NIHSS score was 2 (1.0-4.0). The incidence rate of persistent headache attributed to past ischemic stroke was 12/119 (10.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3-17.0%). The most frequent pattern presented was a migraine-like pattern in seven of the 12 (58.3%) patients, which had a substantial/severe impact on five of the 12 (41.7%). For most patients this headache continued, although it began to improve. Previous migraine (odds ratio 7.1, 95% CI 1.06-50.0; p = 0.043) and headache intensity in the acute phase of stroke (odds ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.13-2.7; p = 0.012) were associated with the occurrence of persistent headache attributed to past ischemic stroke. CONCLUSION: Persistent headache attributed to past ischemic stroke is a frequent complication after stroke. It often has a significant impact on patients' lives and presents a migraine-like pattern as its most frequent phenotype.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Trastornos Migrañosos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
5.
BMC Endocr Disord ; 24(1): 20, 2024 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymphocytic hypophysitis is a rare autoimmune condition that usually presents during pregnancy and causes inflammation of the pituitary gland. Although the pathophysiology is not well understood, it often presents with headaches, visual disturbances, and symptoms of hypopituitarism. However, not all cases may present with hypopituitarism which can make this rare disease with an incidence of ~ 1 in 9 million much more difficult to diagnose. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 35-year-old G4P4 woman with progressive vision loss and intermittent frontal headaches during her first trimester through 2 months postpartum. She presented with no symptoms of hypopituitarism and her hormone panel only showed elevated prolactin, possibly due to her breastfeeding. She was treated with a right pterional craniotomy with decompression of both optic nerves, partial resection of the suprasellar mass, and glucocorticoid therapy for headaches and visual disturbances. CONCLUSION: This case is notable for a presentation of lymphocytic hypophysitis without symptoms of hypopituitarism. This is important for outpatient providers to be aware of, especially those that care for pregnant patients so that unfavorable outcomes can be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Hipofisitis Autoinmune , Hipopituitarismo , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis , Neoplasias Hipofisarias , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Adulto , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Hipofisitis Autoinmune/diagnóstico , Hipofisitis Autoinmune/complicaciones , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Hipófisis/complicaciones , Hipopituitarismo/diagnóstico , Hipopituitarismo/etiología , Hormonas Hipofisarias , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
6.
Neurol Sci ; 45(3): 1209-1216, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicentric cross-sectional study was to collect phenotypes and clinical variability on a large sample of 244 patients enrolled in different university centers in Italy, trying to differentiate subtypes of VM. BACKGROUND: VM is one of the most frequent episodic vertigo characterized by a great clinical variability for duration of attacks and accompanying symptoms. Diagnosis is based only on clinical history of episodic vertigo in 50% of cases associated with migrainous headache or photo/phonophobia. METHODS: We enrolled in different university centers 244 patients affected by definite VM according to the criteria of the Barany Society between January 2022 and December 2022. An audiometric examination and a CNS MRI were performed before inclusion. Patients with low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss were not included, as well as patients with an MRI positive otherwise that for microischemic lesions. Patients were asked to characterize vestibular symptoms choosing among (multiple answers were allowed): internal vertigo, dizziness, visuo-vestibular symptoms/external vertigo; onset of vertigo and duration, neurovegetative, and cochlear accompanying symptoms (hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness during attacks) were collected as well as migrainous headache and/or photo/phonophobia during vertigo; autoimmune disorders were also analyzed. A bedside examination was performed including study of spontaneous-positional nystagmus with infrared video goggles, post head shaking ny, skull vibration test, and video head impulse test. RESULTS: We included 244 subjects, 181 were females (74.2%). The age of onset of the first vertigo was 36.6 ± 14.5 while of the first headache was 23.2 ± 10.1. A positive correlation has been found between the first headache and the first vertigo. The mean duration of vertigo attacks was 11 ± 16 h. We carried on a cluster analysis to identify subgroups of patients with common clinical features. Four variables allowed to aggregate clusters: age of onset of vertigo, duration of vertigo attacks, presence of migrainous headache during vertigo, and presence of cochlear symptoms during vertigo. We identified 5 clusters: cluster 1/group 1 (23 subjects, 9.4%) characterized by longer duration of vertigo attacks; cluster 2/group 2 (52 subjects, 21.3%) characterized by absence of migrainous headache and cochlear symptoms during vertigo; cluster 3/group 3 (44 subjects, 18%) characterized by presence of cochlear symptoms during vertigo but not headache; cluster 4/group 4 (57 subjects, 23.4%) by the presence of both cochlear symptoms and migrainous headache during vertigo; cluster 5/group 5 (68 subjects, 27.9%) characterized by migrainous headache but no cochlear symptoms during vertigo. CONCLUSION: VM is with any evidence a heterogeneous disorder and clinical presentations exhibit a great variability. In VM, both symptoms orienting toward a peripheral mechanism (cochlear symptoms) and central ones (long lasting positional non-paroxysmal vertigo) may coexist. Our study is the first published trying to characterize subgroups of VM subjects, thus orienting toward different pathophysiological mechanisms.


Asunto(s)
Hiperacusia , Trastornos Migrañosos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Vértigo/diagnóstico , Cefalea/complicaciones , Análisis por Conglomerados , Fenotipo
7.
Neurol Sci ; 45(3): 1017-1030, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721571

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we critically evaluate available evidence regarding the association between primary headaches and subsequent decline of cognitive function and dementia. BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggested that headache disorders may increase the risk for dementia. However, available studies are conflicting. METHODS: To identify qualifying studies, we searched scientific databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct and BMC, screening for relevant papers. In order to reduce the heterogeneity between different studies, the analyses were further subdivided according to the clinical diagnoses and the study methodologies. RESULTS: We identified 23 studies investigating the association between primary headaches and the risk of dementia. Of these, 18 met our inclusion criteria for meta-analysis (covering 924.140 individuals). Overall effect-size shows that primary headaches were associated with a small increase in dementia risk (OR = 1,15; CI 95%: 1,03-1,28; p = 0,02). Analyzing subgroups, we found that migraine was associated with both a moderate increased risk of all-cause dementia (OR = 1,26; p = 0,00; 95% CI: 1,13-1,40) as well as a moderate increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (OR = 2,00; p = 0,00; 95% CI: 1,46-2,75). This association was significant in both case-control and retrospective cohort studies but not in prospective studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the presence of a link between primary headaches and dementia. However, in the subgroup analysis, only patients with migraine showed a moderate increase risk for all-cause dementia and for Alzheimer's disease. Additional rigorous studies are needed to elucidate the possible role of primary headaches on the risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Disfunción Cognitiva , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Cefalea/epidemiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones
8.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(4): 205-210, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133705

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We evaluate evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic headache (PTH), a secondary headache disorder resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI), comprising nearly 4% of all symptomatic headache disorders. Utilizing recent publications, we aim to inform clinicians of current treatment methods. RECENT FINDINGS: There is limited research on PTH treatment. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of metoclopramide with diphenhydramine for acute PTH found that the treatment group (N = 81) experienced more significant pain improvement than placebo by 1.4 points. For persistent PTH, an open-label study of erenumab (N = 89) found that 28% of participants reported ≥ 50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days, but an RCT of fremanezumab showed a non-significant reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days. A randomized crossover study of 40 patients with persistent PTH found that onabotulinum toxin-A decreased cumulative number of headaches/week by 43.3% in the treatment group and increased by 35.1% among placebos. In a study of military veterans with severe posttraumatic stress disorder and persistent/delayed onset PTH (N = 193), patients who received Cognitive Behavioral Therapy reported significant improvements in headache-related disability compared to usual care (aggregate mean HIT-6, -3.4). A transcranial magnetic stimulation (N = 24) study found that 58% of participants with mild TBI-related headache experienced a 50% reduction in headache frequency. New studies indicate promise in improving clinically important outcomes of PTH. However, more research is necessary to determine the optimal treatment and whether combining pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment versus a single modality is more effective.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Cefalea Postraumática , Humanos , Cefalea Postraumática/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea Postraumática/complicaciones , Cefalea/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Dolor/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
9.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(3): 73-81, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091239

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: While primary headaches like migraines or cluster headaches are prevalent and often debilitating, it's the secondary headaches-those resulting from underlying pathologies-that can be particularly ominous. This article delves into the sinister causes of headaches, underscoring the importance of a meticulous clinical approach, especially when presented with red flags. RECENT FINDINGS: Headaches, one of the most common complaints in clinical practice, span a spectrum from benign tension-type episodes to harbingers of life-threatening conditions. For the seasoned physician, differentiating between these extremes is paramount. Headache etiologies covered in this article will include subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), cervical artery dissection, cerebral venous thrombosis, meningitis, obstructive hydrocephalus, and brain tumor.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Meningitis , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicaciones , Meningitis/complicaciones
10.
Neurosurg Rev ; 47(1): 28, 2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163843

RESUMEN

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-venous fistula can cause spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) and poses a significant diagnostic and management challenge. This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical and radiological outcomes of endovascular embolization as a novel treatment approach for CSF-venous fistula in patients with SIH. This systematic review adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the embolization procedure in occlusion of the CSF-venous fistula, and secondary outcomes included procedural complications and improvement of clinical symptoms and radiological findings. A total of nine studies consisting of 77 patients met the inclusion criteria. Orthostatic and/or Valsalva headache was the most common symptom. The mean age of the patients was 57 ± 8.9 years, and females accounted for 59.7% (46/77) of the cases. Sixty-five (84.4%) patients reported complete resolution or significant improvement in symptoms. The Bern score, Headache Impact Test-6, and the Patient Global Impression of Change scales demonstrated significant improvements in radiological findings and patients' quality of life. Following the procedure, 22 patients (28.6%) experienced rebound intracranial hypertension and 27 patients (35.1%) had transient local pain at the site of the embolization. Our study showed that endovascular embolization is a safe and effective treatment for CSF-venous fistula in patients with SIH, providing complete resolution or significant improvement of clinical symptoms and radiological findings, and positive impacts on patients' quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Hipotensión Intracraneal , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/terapia , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/complicaciones , Fístula/complicaciones , Cefalea/terapia , Cefalea/complicaciones , Hipotensión Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipotensión Intracraneal/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos
11.
Postgrad Med J ; 100(1180): 68-83, 2024 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37978050

RESUMEN

The evolution of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 pandemic and its vaccination raised more attention to cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Although CVT is less prevalent than arterial stroke, it results in larger years of life lost. CVT is more common in women and young patients. Predisposing factors are categorized as transient factors such as pregnancy, puerperium, oral contraceptive pills, trauma, and dehydration; and permanent factors such as neoplastic, vasculitic, thrombophilic, hematologic conditions, infectious causes such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection and HIV. The most common manifestations are headache, seizures, focal neurologic deficits, altered level of consciousness, and cranial nerve palsies. The most common syndromes are stroke-like, raised-intracranial-pressure (ICP), isolated-headache, and encephalopathy, which may have overlaps. Diagnosis is mostly based on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and their respective venous sequences, supported by blood results abnormalities such as D-dimer elevation. Treatment includes the prevention of propagation of current thrombus with anticoagulation (heparin, or low molecular weight heparinoids and then warfarin, or direct oral anticoagulants), decreasing ICP (even by decompressive craniotomy), and treatment of specific underlying diseases.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis Intracraneal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Trombosis de la Vena , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Trombosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Intracraneal/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefalea/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones
12.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4): 376-378, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527340

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Although systemic complications following liposuction are rare, visual impairment has been reported in a few cases and may occur for a variety of reasons. Here we present the case of a 31-year-old woman who underwent 360° liposuction and subsequently developed headaches and delayed partial visual disturbance 10 days after the procedure. She had symptoms suggestive of idiopathic intracranial hypertension, which was confirmed by lumbar puncture. A literature search revealed other case reports of visual changes or headaches following high-volume liposuction. Our case provides further evidence of a rare association between liposuction and idiopathic intracranial hypertension, emphasizing the need for thorough preoperative evaluations and the consideration of possible risks.


Asunto(s)
Lipectomía , Seudotumor Cerebral , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Seudotumor Cerebral/cirugía , Seudotumor Cerebral/complicaciones , Lipectomía/efectos adversos , Trastornos de la Visión/etiología , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Visión/cirugía , Cefalea/complicaciones , Cefalea/cirugía , Punción Espinal/efectos adversos
13.
Neurol Neurochir Pol ; 58(1): 21-30, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38393961

RESUMEN

Low pressure of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a rare cause of headache, except when the patient undergoes a lumbar puncture. Headache associated with a low CSF pressure i.e. intracranial hypotension causes diagnostic difficulties. Headaches related to spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) pose a significant diagnostic challenge in everyday neurological practice. Patients with headaches due to SIH are usually diagnosed only after a long delay. Diagnostic problems may result in unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures, or even neurosurgical operations. Diagnosing headaches attributed to SIH requires the consideration of several clinical scenarios, and the disease's features causing primary or secondary disturbances. In this review, we discuss the differential diagnosis of SIH-related headaches with reference to accumulated knowledge, including meta-analyses, guidelines, casuistry, and the applicable criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. In addition, we discuss head and spine magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, which may indicate intracranial hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Hipotensión Intracraneal , Humanos , Hipotensión Intracraneal/diagnóstico , Hipotensión Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Cefalea/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos , Diagnóstico Diferencial
14.
J Med Virol ; 95(12): e29291, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38058258

RESUMEN

Ramsay Hunt syndrome (RHS) is a manifestation of reactivated varicella-zoster virus (VZV) from the geniculate ganglion. Data on clinical features and outcomes of patients with RHS and concurrent VZV meningitis (henceforth RHS meningitis) are limited. Thus, we conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of all adults hospitalized for RHS meningitis at the departments of infectious diseases in Denmark from 2015 to 2020. Patients with VZV meningitis without cranial nerve palsies were included for comparison. In total, 37 patients with RHS meningitis (mean annual incidence: 1.6/1 000 000 adults) and 162 with VZV meningitis without cranial nerve palsies were included. In RHS meningitis, the median age was 52 years (interquartile range: 35-64), and in addition to peripheral facial nerve palsy (100%), dizziness (46%), and hearing loss (35%) were common symptoms. The triad of headache, neck stiffness, and photophobia/hyperacusis was less common in RHS meningitis than in VZV meningitis without cranial nerve palsies (0/27 [0%] vs. 24/143 [17%]; p = 0.02). At 30 days after discharge, 18/36 (50%) patients with RHS meningitis had persistent peripheral facial nerve palsy, with no statistically significant difference between those treated with and without adjuvant glucocorticoids (6/16 [38%] vs. 12/20 [60%]; p = 0.18). Additional sequelae of RHS meningitis included dizziness (29%), neuralgia (14%), tinnitus/hyperacusis (11%), hearing loss (9%), headache (9%), fatigue (6%), and concentration difficulties (3%). In conclusion, clinical features and outcomes of RHS meningitis were primarily related to cranial neuropathies.


Asunto(s)
Varicela , Parálisis Facial , Pérdida Auditiva , Herpes Zóster Ótico , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herpes Zóster Ótico/complicaciones , Herpes Zóster Ótico/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster Ótico/diagnóstico , Herpesvirus Humano 3/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Mareo , Hiperacusia/complicaciones , Cefalea/complicaciones , Dinamarca/epidemiología
15.
Cephalalgia ; 43(5): 3331024231161740, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37177818

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study examined the trajectory, classification, and features of posttraumatic headache after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Children (N = 213; ages 8.00 to 16.99 years) were recruited from two pediatric emergency departments <24 hours of sustaining a mild traumatic brain injury or mild orthopedic injury. At 10 days, three months, and six months postinjury, parents completed a standardized questionnaire that was used to classify premorbid and posttraumatic headache as migraine, tension-type headache, or not otherwise classified. Multilevel mixed effects models were used to examine posttraumatic headache rate, severity, frequency, and duration in relation to group, time postinjury, and premorbid headache, controlling for age, sex, and site. RESULTS: PTH risk was greater after mild traumatic brain injury than mild orthopedic injury at 10 days (odds ratio = 197.41, p < .001) and three months postinjury (odds ratio = 3.50, p = .030), especially in children without premorbid headache. Posttraumatic headache was more frequent after mild traumatic brain injury than mild orthopedic injury, ß (95% confidence interval) = 0.80 (0.05, 1.55). Groups did not differ in other examined headache features and classification any time postinjury. CONCLUSIONS: Posttraumatic headache risk increases after mild traumatic brain injury relative to mild orthopedic injury for approximately three months postinjury, but is not clearly associated with a distinct phenotype.


Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Cefalea Postraumática , Humanos , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Prospectivos , Cefalea Postraumática/epidemiología , Cefalea Postraumática/etiología , Cefalea/complicaciones
16.
Cephalalgia ; 43(1): 3331024221133386, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694449

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Recurrent Painful Ophthalmoplegic Neuropathy, previously known as Ophthalmoplegic Migraine, is a poorly characterized disorder mainly because there are few cases described. We report a new case of Recurrent Painful Ophthalmoplegic Neuropathy and a review of the literature to contribute to increasing the knowledge of the clinical features of this disorder. CASE REPORT AND REVIEW OF LITERATURE: A 45-year-old woman presented with adult-onset recurrent attacks of abducens and oculomotor palsy associated with diplopia followed by headache. Most notably, pain always presented many days after oculomotor impairment, a feature never described in the literature. A diagnosis of possible Recurrent Painful Ophthalmoplegic Neuropathy was made after excluding other possible mimicking disorders. Symptoms usually resolved gradually with corticosteroid therapy, albeit without a clear-cut benefit.Clinical data collected from 1989 to 2022 showed that adult onset in Recurrent Painful Ophthalmoplegic Neuropathy is not uncommon. While III cranial nerve palsy is typical, VI and IV nerve palsy have also been described. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND DIAGNOSIS: Several hypotheses have been proposed, including nerve compression, ischemia or inflammation/demyelination, but none has been completely accepted.Diagnosis remains of exclusion; magnetic resonance imaging and blood exams are key in differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our case gives us the possibility to expand the clinical features of Recurrent Painful Ophthalmoplegic Neuropathy, also contributing to updating the pathophysiological hypotheses.


Asunto(s)
Oftalmoplejía , Migraña Oftalmopléjica , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oftalmoplejía/complicaciones , Oftalmoplejía/diagnóstico , Migraña Oftalmopléjica/complicaciones , Migraña Oftalmopléjica/diagnóstico , Cefalea/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
17.
Cephalalgia ; 43(3): 3331024221148659, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36786376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypnic Headache, also known as "alarm clock headache", is a rare primary headache disorder. It is characterized by frequently recurring headache attacks, which only develop during sleep, especially nighttime sleep. OBJECTIVE: This article gives a narrative review on the current knowledge about Hypnic Headache with a focus on secondary Hypnic Headache. METHODS: Based on literature research, using Pubmed and Google Scholar, latest case reports, studies, and systematic reviews about Hypnic Headache were analyzed and summarized focusing on therapeutic options and causes of secondary Hypnic Headache. CONCLUSION: Hypnic Headache mainly occurs in elderly patients. However, younger patients and children may also suffer from Hypnic Headache. Many different causes of secondary Hypnic Headache are described in the literature and ought to be ruled out before diagnosing primary Hypnic Headache. The pathophysiology of primary Hypnic Headache remains unclear, but a dysfunction of the hypothalamus seems to play a key role.


Asunto(s)
Cefaleas Primarias , Cefalea , Niño , Humanos , Anciano , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/complicaciones , Sueño , Cefaleas Primarias/terapia , Cefaleas Primarias/tratamiento farmacológico
18.
Cephalalgia ; 43(1): 3331024221133383, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36694429

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While migraine and cluster headache share some clinical features and therapies, they differ considerably in the frequency and duration of the headache, as well as the inter-attack, or inter-bout, pathophysiology. Neither is fully understood, with their shared pathways being of interest. FINDINGS: Five patients for whom it was difficult to distinguish migraine from cluster headache are presented. They had aspects of their phenotypes, which could be attributed to both disorders. Each patient was thoroughly examined, excluding secondary causes of headache, and had been treated with a number of medicines. CONCLUSION: A correct diagnosis is key to the appropriate treatment approach. Especially, if treatment is not successful for the suspected headache type, and enlargement of the diagnostic and therapeutic range, respectively, should be evaluated. Whether in such settings there is shared or different pathophysiology can only be speculated upon.


Asunto(s)
Cefalalgia Histamínica , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Cefalalgia Histamínica/diagnóstico , Cefalalgia Histamínica/epidemiología , Cefalalgia Histamínica/terapia , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Trastornos Migrañosos/terapia , Cefalea/complicaciones , Comorbilidad
19.
Cephalalgia ; 43(8): 3331024231187160, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548299

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary headache syndromes such as migraine are among the most common neurological syndromes. Chronic facial pain syndromes of non-odontogenic cause are less well known to neurologists despite being highly disabling. Given the pain localization, these patients often consult dentists first who may conduct unnecessary dental interventions even if a dental cause is not identified. Once it becomes clear that dental modalities have no effect on the pain, patients may be referred to another dentist or orofacial pain specialist, and later to a neurologist. Unfortunately, neurologists are also often not familiar with chronic orofacial pain syndromes although they share the neural system, i.e., trigeminal nerve and central processing areas for headache disorders. CONCLUSION: In essence, three broad groups of orofacial pain patients are important for clinicians: (i) Attack-like orofacial pain conditions, which encompass neuralgias of the cranial nerves and less well-known facial variants of primary headache syndromes; (ii) persistent orofacial pain disorders, including neuropathic pain and persistent idiopathic facial/dentoalveolar pain; and (iii) other differential diagnostically relevant orofacial pain conditions encountered by clinicians such as painful temporomandibular disorders, bruxism, sinus pain, dental pain, and others which may interfere (trigger) and overlap with headache. It is rewarding to know and recognize the clinical picture of these facial pain syndromes, given that, just like for headache, an internationally accepted classification system has been published and many of these syndromes can be treated with medications generally used by neurologists for other pain syndromes.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neuralgia Facial , Trastornos de Cefalalgia , Neuralgia , Neuralgia del Trigémino , Humanos , Neuralgia del Trigémino/etiología , Síndrome , Dolor Facial/etiología , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia Facial/diagnóstico , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/complicaciones , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico
20.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 47(1): 71-76, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202318

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Women with endometriosis are frequently affected by headache. How many of these have a clear diagnosis of migraine? Are the different forms of migraine related to the phenotypes and/or characteristics of endometriosis? DESIGN: This was a prospective nested case-control study. A consecutive series of 131 women with endometriosis who attended the endometriosis clinic were enrolled and examined for the presence of headache. A headache questionnaire was used to determine the characteristics of the headaches, and the diagnosis of migraine was confirmed by a specialist. The case group included women with endometriosis and a diagnosis of migraine, while the control group included women with only endometriosis. History, symptoms and other comorbidities were collected. A pelvic pain score and associated symptoms were assessed using a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: A diagnosis of migraine was made in 53.4% (70/131) of participants. Pure menstrual migraine was reported by 18.6% (13/70), menstrually related migraine by 45.7% (32/70) and non-menstrual migraine by 35.7% (25/70). Dysmenorrhoea and dysuria were significantly more frequent in patients with endometriosis and migraine than in those without migraine (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01). No difference was found for other variables, including age at diagnosis and duration of endometriosis, endometriosis phenotype, the presence of other autoimmune comorbidities or heavy menstrual bleeding. In most patients with migraine (85.7%) the headache symptoms had started years before the diagnosis of endometriosis. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of headache in many patients with endometriosis is associated with the presence of different forms of migraine, is related to pain symptoms and often precedes the diagnosis of endometriosis.


Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Trastornos Migrañosos , Humanos , Femenino , Dismenorrea/complicaciones , Dismenorrea/diagnóstico , Dismenorrea/epidemiología , Endometriosis/complicaciones , Endometriosis/diagnóstico , Endometriosis/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Cefalea/complicaciones , Cefalea/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA