Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 337
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood ; 134(3): 304-316, 2019 07 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043425

RESUMEN

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) and late acute graft-versus-host disease (L-aGVHD) are understudied complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Criteria (NIH-CC) were designed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of cGVHD and to better classify graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) syndromes but have not been validated in patients <18 years of age. The objectives of this prospective multi-institution study were to determine: (1) whether the NIH-CC could be used to diagnose pediatric cGVHD and whether the criteria operationalize well in a multi-institution study; (2) the frequency of cGVHD and L-aGVHD in children using the NIH-CC; and (3) the clinical features and risk factors for cGVHD and L-aGVHD using the NIH-CC. Twenty-seven transplant centers enrolled 302 patients <18 years of age before conditioning and prospectively followed them for 1 year posttransplant for development of cGVHD. Centers justified their cGVHD diagnosis according to the NIH-CC using central review and a study adjudication committee. A total of 28.2% of reported cGVHD cases was reclassified, usually as L-aGVHD, following study committee review. Similar incidence of cGVHD and L-aGVHD was found (21% and 24.7%, respectively). The most common organs involved with diagnostic or distinctive manifestations of cGVHD in children include the mouth, skin, eyes, and lungs. Importantly, the 2014 NIH-CC for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome perform poorly in children. Past acute GVHD and peripheral blood grafts are major risk factors for cGVHD and L-aGVHD, with recipients ≥12 years of age being at risk for cGVHD. Applying the NIH-CC in pediatrics is feasible and reliable; however, further refinement of the criteria specifically for children is needed.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Evaluación de Síntomas , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Homólogo , Estados Unidos , Flujo de Trabajo
2.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 143(5): 1711-1726, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30731123

RESUMEN

The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases organized a workshop to develop trial concepts that could improve the use and effectiveness of aeroallergen immunotherapy (AAIT). Expert groups were formed to accomplish the following tasks: (1) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous versus sublingual AAIT; (2) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of AAIT by using 1 or a few allergens versus all or most allergens to which a patient is sensitized; (3) propose a study design to determine whether AAIT can alter the progression of childhood allergic airways disease; and (4) propose a study design to determine the optimal dose and duration of AAIT to achieve maximal effectiveness with acceptable safety. Study designs were presented by the workgroups, extensively discussed at the workshop, and revised for this report. The proposed trials would be of long duration and require large highly characterized patient populations. Scientific caveats and feasibility matters are discussed. These concepts are intended to help the development of clinical trials that can address some of the major questions related to the practice of AAIT for the management and prevention of allergic airways disease.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Administración Sublingual , Contaminantes Atmosféricos/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Asma/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Educación , Testimonio de Experto , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , Proyectos de Investigación , Estados Unidos
3.
Circulation ; 138(3): 305-315, 2018 07 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012703

RESUMEN

Lipid droplets (LDs) are distinct and dynamic organelles that affect the health of cells and organs. Much progress has been made in understanding how these structures are formed, how they interact with other cellular organelles, how they are used for storage of triacylglycerol in adipose tissue, and how they regulate lipolysis. Our understanding of the biology of LDs in the heart and vascular tissue is relatively primitive in comparison with LDs in adipose tissue and liver. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a working group to discuss how LDs affect cardiovascular diseases. The goal of the working group was to examine the current state of knowledge on the cell biology of LDs, including current methods to study them in cells and organs and reflect on how LDs influence the development and progression of cardiovascular diseases. This review summarizes the working group discussion and recommendations on research areas ripe for future investigation that will likely improve our understanding of atherosclerosis and heart function.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Gotas Lipídicas/metabolismo , Miocardio/metabolismo , Animales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Interacción Gen-Ambiente , Humanos , Metabolismo de los Lípidos , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , Estados Unidos
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 140(4): 933-949, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28502823

RESUMEN

Environmental exposures have been recognized as critical in the initiation and exacerbation of asthma, one of the most common chronic childhood diseases. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and Merck Childhood Asthma Network sponsored a joint workshop to discuss the current state of science with respect to the indoor environment and its effects on the development and morbidity of childhood asthma. The workshop included US and international experts with backgrounds in allergy/allergens, immunology, asthma, environmental health, environmental exposures and pollutants, epidemiology, public health, and bioinformatics. Workshop participants provided new insights into the biologic properties of indoor exposures, indoor exposure assessment, and exposure reduction techniques. This informed a primary focus of the workshop: to critically review trials and research relevant to the prevention or control of asthma through environmental intervention. The participants identified important limitations and gaps in scientific methodologies and knowledge and proposed and prioritized areas for future research. The group reviewed socioeconomic and structural challenges to changing environmental exposure and offered recommendations for creative study design to overcome these challenges in trials to improve asthma management. The recommendations of this workshop can serve as guidance for future research in the study of the indoor environment and on environmental interventions as they pertain to the prevention and management of asthma and airway allergies.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación del Aire Interior/efectos adversos , Asma/prevención & control , Industria Farmacéutica , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.) , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U.S.) , Organizaciones sin Fines de Lucro , Animales , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Investigación Biomédica , Niño , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Salud Ambiental , Obtención de Fondos , Humanos , Estados Unidos
5.
Ann Hematol ; 95(3): 493-9, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26659079

RESUMEN

The purpose of the study was to validate a recently proposed new grading system for ocular manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Diagnosis of cGVHD was based on the NIH consensus criteria. In addition, a grading scale was applied, which has been developed by the German-Austrian-Swiss Consensus Conference on Clinical Practice in cGVHD. Sixty-six patients (male n = 46, female n = 20, mean age 48 years) with ocular cGVHD were included. Application of the proposed Consensus Conference grading revealed inflammatory activity in all patients with mild (33 %), moderate (44 %), or severe inflammation (23 %). Clinical scoring by the NIH scoring system showed that 6 % of patients had mild symptoms; 59 % of patients had moderate dry eye symptoms partially affecting activities of daily living, without vision impairment; and 35 % of patients had severe dry eye symptoms significantly affecting daily activities. Clinical characterization and grading by the Consensus Conference grading scale revealed that ocular cGVHD (1) frequently leads to severe ocular surface disease based on impaired function of the lacrimal glands and involvement of cornea, conjunctiva, and lids; (2) is mostly associated with ongoing inflammatory activity; (3) often leads to functional impairment and reduced quality of life; and (4) is associated with an increased risk for severe, sight-threatening complications.


Asunto(s)
Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Oftalmopatías/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Austria/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania/epidemiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suiza/epidemiología , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61Suppl 3: S173-8, 2015 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26409280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2012 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for standardized diagnostic categories of pulmonary tuberculosis in children have not been validated. We aimed to assess the NIH diagnostic criteria in children with culture-confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis and those in whom tuberculosis has been excluded. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive children hospitalized with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa, who were enrolled in a diagnostic study. Children were categorized as definite tuberculosis (culture positive), probable tuberculosis (chest radiograph consistent), possible tuberculosis (chest radiograph inconsistent), or not tuberculosis (improved without tuberculosis treatment). We applied the NIH diagnostic categories to the cohort and evaluated their performance specifically in children with definite tuberculosis and not tuberculosis. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-four children (median age, 25.1 months [interquartile range, 13.5-61.5 months]) were included; 96 (20.7%) were HIV infected. Of these, 165 (35.6%) were definite tuberculosis, and 299 (64.4%) were not tuberculosis. If strict NIH symptom criteria were applied, 100 (21.6%) were unclassifiable including 21 (21.0%) with definite pulmonary tuberculosis, as they did not meet the NIH criteria due to short duration of symptoms; 71 (71%) had cough <14 days, 48 (48%) had recent weight loss, and 39 (39%) had fever <7 days. Of 364 classifiable children, there was moderate agreement (κ = 0.48) with 100% agreement for definite tuberculosis and moderate agreement for not tuberculosis (220 [60.4%] vs 89 [24.5%]). CONCLUSIONS: Entry criteria for diagnostic studies should not be restrictive. Data from this analysis have informed revision of the NIH definitions.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Estados Unidos
7.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(3): 389-401.e1, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25529383

RESUMEN

The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference proposed new criteria for diagnosing and scoring the severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The 2014 NIH consensus maintains the framework of the prior consensus with further refinement based on new evidence. Revisions have been made to address areas of controversy or confusion, such as the overlap chronic GVHD subcategory and the distinction between active disease and past tissue damage. Diagnostic criteria for involvement of mouth, eyes, genitalia, and lungs have been revised. Categories of chronic GVHD should be defined in ways that indicate prognosis, guide treatment, and define eligibility for clinical trials. Revisions have been made to focus attention on the causes of organ-specific abnormalities. Attribution of organ-specific abnormalities to chronic GVHD has been addressed. This paradigm shift provides greater specificity and more accurately measures the global burden of disease attributed to GVHD, and it will facilitate biomarker association studies.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Enfermedad Crónica , Consenso , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/metabolismo , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Especificidad de Órganos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados Unidos
8.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 134(4): 900-7, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24746752

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In response to recommendations from the 2010 National Institutes of Health Asthma Outcomes Workshop, we developed a system for measuring the negative impact of asthma on quality of life (QoL), which was referred to as the RAND Negative Impact of Asthma on Quality of Life (RAND-IAQL) item bank. The bank contains 65 items that focus on the patient's perception of the impact or bother of asthma on his or her life. OBJECTIVE: Evidence for the validity of 2 short forms, the RAND-IAQL 4-item and 12-item Short Forms, from the bank is presented. METHODS: Using a sample of 2032 adults with asthma, we validated our short forms against the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire-Marks (AQLQ-M), the Asthma Control Test, and generic measures of QoL developed by the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Discriminant validity was examined by comparing scores of respondents who differed according to multiple health indicators. RESULTS: Our sample ranged in age from 18 to 99 years (mean, 43 years), with 14% Hispanic, 11% Asian, 19% African American, and 56% non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity. Men had a significantly worse impact of asthma on QoL than women. The impact of asthma on QoL was greatest in African American and Hispanic subjects compared with that seen in non-Hispanic white subjects. Our measures correlated highly with the AQLQ-M and more strongly with the PROMIS global physical than mental scales. They differentiated between adults with asthma according to their perceived severity, level of control, presence or absence of exacerbations, and physical comorbidity. CONCLUSION: The RAND-IAQL item bank, measuring the impact of asthma on QoL, will complement other patient-reported outcomes, such as measures of asthma symptoms, functioning, and control.


Asunto(s)
Asma/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asma/psicología , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
9.
Blood ; 120(13): 2545-52; quiz 2774, 2012 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22773386

RESUMEN

There are no validated criteria to measure skin response in chronic GVHD. In a prospectively assembled, multicenter cohort of patients with chronic GVHD (N = 458), we looked for correlation of change in several different scales recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus with clinician and patient perception of change and overall survival. Of the clinician scales, the NIH composite 0-3 skin score was the only one that correlated with both clinician and patient perception of improvement or worsening. Of the patient-reported scales, the skin subscale of the Lee Symptom Scale was the only one that correlated with both clinician and patient perception of improvement or worsening. At study entry, NIH skin score 3 and Lee skin symptom score > 15 were both associated with worse overall survival. Worsening of NIH skin score at 6 months was associated with worse overall survival. Improvement in the Lee skin symptom score at 6 months was associated with improved overall survival. Our findings support the use of the NIH composite 0-3 skin score and the Lee skin symptom score as simple and sensitive measures to evaluate skin involvement in clinical trials as well as in the clinical monitoring of patients with cutaneous chronic GVHD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Autoinforme , Enfermedades de la Piel/mortalidad , Enfermedades de la Piel/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/complicaciones , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades de la Piel/etiología , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
10.
Histopathology ; 65(2): 240-51, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24511905

RESUMEN

AIMS: To gain a better understanding of the reasons for diagnostic variability, with the aim of reducing the phenomenon. METHODS AND RESULTS: In preparation for a study on the interpretation of breast specimens (B-PATH), a panel of three experienced breast pathologists reviewed 336 cases to develop consensus reference diagnoses. After independent assessment, cases coded as diagnostically discordant were discussed at consensus meetings. By the use of qualitative data analysis techniques, transcripts of 16 h of consensus meetings for a subset of 201 cases were analysed. Diagnostic variability could be attributed to three overall root causes: (i) pathologist-related; (ii) diagnostic coding/study methodology-related; and (iii) specimen-related. Most pathologist-related root causes were attributable to professional differences in pathologists' opinions about whether the diagnostic criteria for a specific diagnosis were met, most frequently in cases of atypia. Diagnostic coding/study methodology-related root causes were primarily miscategorizations of descriptive text diagnoses, which led to the development of a standardized electronic diagnostic form (BPATH-Dx). Specimen-related root causes included artefacts, limited diagnostic material, and poor slide quality. After re-review and discussion, a consensus diagnosis could be assigned in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic variability is related to multiple factors, but consensus conferences, standardized electronic reporting formats and comments on suboptimal specimen quality can be used to reduce diagnostic variability.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Patología Quirúrgica/normas , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estados Unidos
11.
Blood ; 118(15): 4242-9, 2011 Oct 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21791424

RESUMEN

In 2005, the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic GVHD proposed a new scoring system for individual organs and an algorithm for calculating global severity (mild, moderate, severe). The Chronic GVHD Consortium was established to test these new criteria. This report includes the first 298 adult patients enrolled at 5 centers of the Consortium. Patients were assessed every 3-6 months using standardized forms recommended by the Consensus Conference. At the time of study enrollment, global chronic GVHD severity was mild in 10% (n = 32), moderate in 59% (n = 175), and severe in 31% (n = 91). Skin, lung, or eye scores determined the global severity score in the majority of cases, with the other 5 organs determining 16% of the global severity scores. Conventional risk factors predictive for onset of chronic GVHD and nonrelapse mortality in people with chronic GVHD were not associated with NIH global severity scores. Global severity scores at enrollment were associated with nonrelapse mortality (P < .0001) and survival (P < .0001); 2-year overall survival was 62% (severe), 86% (moderate), and 97% (mild). Patients with mild chronic GVHD have a good prognosis, while patients with severe chronic GVHD have a poor prognosis. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as no. NCT00637689.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/patología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Estados Unidos
12.
Ophthalmology ; 119(3): 487-93, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22153706

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To validate measurement scales for rating ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Candidate scales were recommended for use in clinical trials by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Chronic GVHD Consensus Conference or have been previously validated in dry eye syndromes. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. PARTICIPANTS: Between August 2007 and June 2010, the study enrolled 387 patients with chronic GVHD in a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort. METHODS: Using anchor-based methods, we compared clinician or patient-reported changes in eye symptoms (8-point scale) with calculated changes in 5 candidate scales: The NIH eye score, patient-reported global rating of eye symptoms, Lee eye subscale, Ocular Surface Disease Index, and Schirmer test. Change was examined for 333 follow-up visits where both clinician and patient reported eye involvement at the previous visit. Linear mixed models were used to account for within-patient correlation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An 8-point scale of clinician or patient-reported symptom change was used as an anchor to measure symptom changes at the follow-up visits. RESULTS: In serial evaluations, agreement regarding improvement, stability, or worsening between the clinician and patient was fair (weighted kappa = 0.34). Despite only fair agreement between evaluators, all scales except the Schirmer test correlated with both clinician-reported and patient-reported changes in ocular GVHD activity. Among all scales, changes in the NIH eye scores showed the greatest sensitivity to symptom change reported by clinicians or patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of the NIH eye score as a sensitive measure of eye symptom changes in clinical trials assessing treatment of chronic GVHD.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
13.
Alzheimers Dement ; 8(1): 1-13, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22265587

RESUMEN

A consensus panel from the United States and Europe was convened recently to update and revise the 1997 consensus guidelines for the neuropathologic evaluation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other diseases of brain that are common in the elderly. The new guidelines recognize the pre-clinical stage of AD, enhance the assessment of AD to include amyloid accumulation as well as neurofibrillary change and neuritic plaques, establish protocols for the neuropathologic assessment of Lewy body disease, vascular brain injury, hippocampal sclerosis, and TDP-43 inclusions, and recommend standard approaches for the workup of cases and their clinico-pathologic correlation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Encéfalo/patología , National Institute on Aging (U.S.)/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Immunol Rev ; 222: 357-68, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18364014

RESUMEN

Immune T cells can kill cancer cells. Cancer vaccines function by increasing the number of immune T cells. There are exceedingly strict biologic limits imposed on the immune system to prevent excessive T-cell activation and expansion. The same biological restrictions limit cancer vaccines. Immunotherapeutic agents that circumvent the biological restrictions have been invented and formulated, including (i) dendritic cell activators and growth factors, (ii) vaccine adjuvants, (iii) T-cell stimulators and growth factors, (iv) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and (v) agents to neutralize or inhibit suppressive cells, cytokines, and enzymes. Few of these agents are broadly available for the development of effective multiple component regimens. The major problem facing immunotherapy today is a lack of broad availability of agents already in existence. The National Cancer Institute has developed a well-vetted ranked list of agents with high potential to serve as immunotherapeutic drugs. This review focuses on 12 of the agents, all with proven ability to augment T-cell responses. Alone, each has little chance of making substantial inroads into cancer therapy. In combinations dictated by biology, the agents are overwhelmingly likely to have an impact. Future availability of these agents for development of innovative combination cancer therapy regimens will provide a benchmark for the resolve of the national cancer therapy translational research enterprise.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/inmunología , Antígenos de Neoplasias/inmunología , Antígenos CD40/inmunología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/tendencias , Terapia Combinada/tendencias , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/inmunología , Humanos , Interleucina-15/inmunología , Activación de Linfocitos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.) , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Escape del Tumor/inmunología , Estados Unidos
15.
Blood ; 114(3): 702-8, 2009 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19470693

RESUMEN

Historically, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) beyond 100 days after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was called chronic GVHD, even if the clinical manifestations were indistinguishable from acute GVHD. In 2005, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored a consensus conference that proposed new criteria for diagnosis and classification of chronic GVHD for clinical trials. According to the consensus criteria, clinical manifestations rather than time after transplantation should be used in clinical trials to distinguish chronic GVHD from late acute GVHD, which includes persistent, recurrent, or late-onset acute GVHD. We evaluated major outcomes according to the presence or absence of NIH criteria for chronic GVHD in a retrospective study of 740 patients diagnosed with historically defined chronic GVHD after allogeneic HCT between 1994 and 2000. The presence or absence of NIH criteria for chronic GVHD showed no statistically significant association with survival, risks of nonrelapse mortality or recurrent malignancy, or duration of systemic treatment. Antecedent late acute GVHD was associated with an increased risk of nonrelapse mortality and prolonged treatment among patients with NIH chronic GVHD. Our results support the consensus recommendation that, with appropriate stratification, clinical trials can include patients with late acute GVHD as well as those with NIH chronic GVHD.


Asunto(s)
Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/clasificación , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedad Aguda , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Humanos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
16.
Haematologica ; 96(11): 1678-84, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21791465

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2005 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on chronic graft-versus-host disease proposed major changes in the classification and grading of severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: We aimed to study the association of the proposed chronic graft-versus-host disease classification and global severity with transplantation outcomes among a consecutive series of patients who received pharmacokinetically-targeted doses of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine conditioning followed by transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. RESULTS: From a total cohort (n = 242) of patients surviving more than 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 181 (75% of those at risk) had some manifestations of graft-versus-host disease after day 100. Of these, at onset 13 (7%) had late acute graft-versus-host disease, 62 (34%) had classic chronic graft-versus-host disease, and 106 (59%) had the overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The global severity of the chronic graft-versus-host disease was mild in 25% of cases, moderate in 46%, and severe in 29%. Multivariable modeling demonstrated the independent association of global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease with overall survival (moderate/severe versus mild; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, P < 0.0001) and non-relapse mortality (moderate versus mild; HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.17-12.73, P = 0.03, and severe versus mild (HR 10.06, 95% CI 3.07-32.97, P < 0.001). The type of onset of progressive chronic graft-versus-host disease and the platelet count at the time of diagnosis of the disease were significantly associated with overall survival. The occurrence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease was also significantly associated with primary disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, as determined by National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria, have an inferior overall survival and worse non-relapse mortality. Clinical and research advances are needed to improve the outcomes of affected patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Estados Unidos
17.
Alzheimers Dement ; 7(3): 257-62, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21514247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) were established in 1984. A broad consensus now exists that these criteria should be revised to incorporate state-of-the-art scientific knowledge. METHODS: The National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Alzheimer's Association sponsored a series of advisory round table meetings in 2009 whose purpose was to establish a process for revising diagnostic and research criteria for AD. The recommendation from these advisory meetings was that three separate work groups should be formed with each assigned the task of formulating diagnostic criteria for one phase of the disease: the dementia phase; the symptomatic, pre-dementia phase; and the asymptomatic, preclinical phase of AD. RESULTS: Two notable differences from the AD criteria published in 1984 are incorporation of biomarkers of the underlying disease state and formalization of different stages of disease in the diagnostic criteria. There was a broad consensus within all three workgroups that much additional work is needed to validate the application of biomarkers for diagnostic purposes. In the revised NIA-Alzheimer's Association criteria, a semantic and conceptual distinction is made between AD pathophysiological processes and clinically observable syndromes that result, whereas this distinction was blurred in the 1984 criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The new criteria for AD are presented in three documents. The core clinical criteria of the recommendations regarding AD dementia and MCI due to AD are intended to guide diagnosis in the clinical setting. However, the recommendations of the preclinical AD workgroup are intended purely for research purposes.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , National Institute on Aging (U.S.)/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
Bull Mem Acad R Med Belg ; 166(10-12): 381-8; discussion 389-90, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082503

RESUMEN

Since the first successful liver transplantation (LT) in 1963 by Starzl, enormous progresses have been made in this field of medicine. The author looks back at the recommendations put forward at the 1983 NIH Consensus conference on liver transplantation in order to show the enormous progresses that have been made in his field during the last four decades. Today almost none of the original indications and contraindications remain in place. Despite the extension of indications, results of LT continuously improved. The attention of the transplant physicians should from now onwards be focused on the achievement of an immunosuppressive free (or tolerant) status in order to further consolidate the excellent obtained long-term results.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Hígado/tendencias , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Humanos , Estados Unidos
19.
Mol Genet Metab ; 101(2-3): 99-109, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20678948

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Health (NIH) published a Consensus Statement on the screening and management of Phenylketonuria (PKU) in 2000. The panel involved in the development of this consensus statement acknowledged the lack of data regarding the potential for more subtle suboptimal outcomes and the need for further research into treatment options. In subsequent years, the approval of new treatment options for PKU and outcome data for patients treated from the newborn period by dietary therapy alone have become available. We hypothesized that a review of the PKU literature since 2000 would provide further evidence related to neurocognitive, psychosocial, and physical outcomes that could serve as a basis for reassessment of the 2000 NIH Consensus Statement. METHODS: A systematic review of literature residing in PubMed, Scopus and PsychInfo was performed in order to assess the outcome data over the last decade in diet-alone early-treated PKU patients to assess the need for new recommendations and validity of older recommendations in light of new evidence. RESULTS: The majority of publications (140/150) that contained primary outcome data presented at least one suboptimal outcome compared to control groups or standardized norms/reference values in at least one of the following areas: neurocognitive/psychosocial (N=60; 58 reporting suboptimal outcomes); quality of life (N=6; 4 reporting suboptimal outcomes); brain pathology (N=32; 30 reporting suboptimal outcomes); growth/nutrition (N=34; 29 reporting suboptimal outcomes); bone pathology (N=9; 9 reporting suboptimal outcomes); and/or maternal PKU (N=19; 19 reporting suboptimal outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the remarkable success of public health programs that have instituted newborn screening and early introduction of dietary therapy for PKU, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that neurocognitive, psychosocial, quality of life, growth, nutrition, bone pathology and maternal PKU outcomes are suboptimal. The time may be right for revisiting the 2000 NIH Consensus Statement in order to address a number of important issues related to PKU management, including treatment advancements for metabolic control in PKU, blood Phe variability, neurocognitive and psychological assessments, routine screening measures for nutritional biomarkers, and bone pathology.


Asunto(s)
Fenilcetonurias/dietoterapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Densidad Ósea , Huesos/patología , Encéfalo/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Madres , Tamizaje Neonatal , Fenilalanina/sangre , Fenilcetonurias/patología , Fenilcetonurias/psicología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/dietoterapia , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
20.
Matern Child Health J ; 14(3): 430-6, 2010 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19495946

RESUMEN

To assess the use of antenatal corticosteroids in clinical circumstances for which both the NIH Guideline and local experts recommend their use and to describe characteristics associated with failure to use recommended antenatal steroids. We convened local experts to adapt the NIH statement by identifying clinical circumstances for which they agree antenatal steroids should always be used. We conducted a retrospective chart review on a cohort study of mothers who delivered premature (24-34 weeks) infants between 2000 and 2002 at three New York City hospitals and investigated the association of failure to treat with antenatal steroids with characteristics of the mother, pregnancy, delivery, and hospital. Twenty percent (101/515) of eligible mothers failed to receive indicated antenatal corticosteroid therapy. Of these, 43% delivered more than 2 h after admission, and 33% delivered more than 4 h after admission, indicating sufficient time to have treated them. Lack of prenatal care, longer gestation, advanced cervical exam, and intact membranes at admission were associated with failure to receive the recommended therapy. Antenatal steroids were under-utilized in our sample. If our results our generalizable, opportunities for quality improvement in the antenatal management of mothers in preterm labor exist.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/organización & administración , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Adulto , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic , Femenino , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Auditoría Médica , Análisis Multivariante , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Trabajo de Parto Prematuro/epidemiología , Selección de Paciente , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA