RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Low-dose external beam radiotherapy (ED-EBRT) is frequently used in the therapy of refractory greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). As studies reporting treatment results are scarce, we retrospectively analyzed our own patient collectives. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 60 patients (74 hips) received LD-EBRT (6 × 0.5 Gy in 29 hips, 6 × 1 Gy in 45). The endpoint was the patient's reported subjective response to treatment. The influence of different patient and treatment characteristics on treatment outcome was investigated. RESULTS: At the end of LD-EBRT, 69% reported partial remission, 4% complete remission, no change 28%. A total of 3 months later (n = 52 hips), the results were 37, 33, and 30% and 18 months after LD-EBRT (n = 47) 21, 51, and 28%. In univariate analysis "inclusion of the total femoral head into the PTV" and "night pain before LD-EBRT" were correlated with symptom remission at the end of LD-EBRT, while "initial increase in pain during LD-EBRT" was significantly associated with treatment failure. In multivariable modeling "initial increase in pain" was identified as a risk factor for treatment failure (p = 0.007; odds ratio [OR] 0.209; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.048-0.957), while "night pain" was an independent factor for remission (p = 0.038; OR 3.484; 95% CI 1.004-12.6). Three months after LD-EBRT "night pain" and "inclusion of the complete femoral neck circumference into the PTV" were predictive for remission. CONCLUSION: LD-EBRT represents a useful treatment option for patients suffering from GTPS. Three months after therapy two-thirds of the patients reported a partial or complete symptom remission. Especially patients who suffered from nocturnal pain seemed to benefit. Treatment appeared to be more effective when the entire circumference of the femoral neck was encompassed.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/radioterapia , Articulación de la Cadera/efectos de la radiación , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fémur/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In this randomized multicenter trial, we compared the effect of a lower single dose of 0.5 Gy vs. a standard single dose of 1 Gy concerning pain relief and quality of life, while maintaining a uniform total dose of 6 Gy. On the basis of laboratory observations, the lower single dose would be expected to be more effective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients suffering from painful heel spur were randomized: Patients in the standard group were treated with single fractions of 6 × 1 Gy twice a week, while the experimental group was treated with single fractions of 12 × 0.5 Gy three times a week. Patients who did not show satisfactory pain relief after 12 weeks were offered re-irradiation with the standard dose. The study's primary endpoints were pain relief and quality of life. Therapy results were evaluated and compared based on follow-up examinations after 12 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: The data of 117 patients could be evaluated. There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the results of a visual analogue scale (VAS), Calcaneodynia Score (CS), and the somatic scale of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-12). Patients undergoing re-irradiation showed a significant benefit concerning pain relief. Their total outcome was comparable to patients showing a good response from the beginning. No relevant acute or chronic side effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: Both patient groups showed good results concerning pain relief. A fractionation schedule of 12 × 0.5 Gy was not superior to the current standard dose of 6 × 1 Gy. Further trials are necessary to explore the best fractionation schedule.
Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Espolón Calcáneo/radioterapia , Dolor/radioterapia , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Aceleradores de Partículas , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of pain reduction by two dose fractionation schedules used for low-dose radiotherapy of painful elbow syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 199 evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective trial. All patients received low-dose orthovoltage radiotherapy. One course consisted of 6 fractions in 3 weeks. In the case of insufficient pain remission after 6 weeks, a second course was administered. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive single doses of either 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. Endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before radiotherapy, as well as immediately after (early response), 6 weeks after (delayed response) and approximately 3 years after (long-term response) completion of radiotherapy using a questionnaire-based visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (range 9-57 months). The overall early, delayed and long-term response rates for all patients were 80, 90 and 94 %, respectively. The mean VAS scores before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response in the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy groups were 59.6 ± 20.2 and 55.7 ± 18.0 (p = 0.46); 32.1 ± 24.5 and 34.4 ± 22.5 (p = 0.26); 27.0 ± 27.7 and 23.5 ± 21.6 (p = 0.82) and 10.7 ± 15.0 and 21.5 ± 26.9 (p = 0.12), respectively. The mean CPS values before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response were 8.7 ± 2.9 and 8.1 ± 3.1 (p = 0.21); 4.5 ± 3.2 and 5.0 ± 3.4 (p = 0.51); 3.9 ± 3.6 and 2.8 ± 2.8 (p = 0.19) and 1.5 ± 2.3 and 2.4 ± 3.5 (p = 0.27), respectively. No significant differences in the quality of the long-term response were found between the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy arms (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Low-dose radiotherapy is an effective treatment for the management of benign painful elbow syndrome. For radiation protection reasons, the dose for a radiotherapy series should not exceed 3.0 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/radioterapia , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Codo/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Protección Radiológica , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of pain reduction by two dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy of painful shoulder syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 312 evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective trial. All patients received low-dose orthovoltage radiotherapy. One course consisted of 6 fractions in 3 weeks. In the case of insufficient pain remission after 6 weeks, a second course was administered. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups to receive single doses of either 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. Endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before radiotherapy, as well as immediately after (early response), 6 weeks after (delayed response) and approximately 3 years after (long-term response) completion of radiotherapy using a questionnaire-based visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 35 months (range 11-57). The overall early, delayed and long-term response rates for all patients were 83, 85 and 82 %, respectively. The mean VAS scores before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response in the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy groups were 56.8 ± 23.7 and 53.2 ± 21.8 (p = 0.16); 38.2 ± 36.1 and 34.0 ± 24.5 (p = 0.19); 33.0 ± 27.2 and 23.7 ± 22.7 (p = 0.04) and 27.9 ± 25.8 and 32.1 ± 26.9 (p = 0.25), respectively. The mean CPS values before treatment and those for early, delayed and long-term response were 9.7 ± 3.0 and 9.5 ± 2.7 (p = 0.31); 6.1 ± 3.6 and 5.4 ± 3.6 (p = 0.10); 5.3 ± 3.7 and 4.1 ± 3.7 (p = 0.05) and 4.0 ± 3.9 and 5.3 ± 4.4 (p = 0.05), respectively. No significant differences in the quality of the long-term response were found between the 0.5- and 1.0-Gy arms (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment for the management of benign painful shoulder syndrome. For radiation protection reasons, the dose for a radiotherapy series should not exceed 3.0 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Bursitis/epidemiología , Bursitis/radioterapia , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Radioterapia Conformacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor de Hombro/epidemiología , Dolor de Hombro/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bursitis/diagnóstico , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Medición de Riesgo , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two different dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy of patients with achillodynia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 112 consecutive evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective randomized trial. All patients underwent radiotherapy with an orthovoltage technique. One radiotherapy course consisted of 6 single fractions over 3 weeks. In case of insufficient remission of pain after 6 weeks, a second radiation series was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either single doses of 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. The endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before, right after, and 6 weeks after radiotherapy with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: The overall response rate for all patients was 84% directly after and 88% 6 weeks after radiotherapy. The mean VAS values before, directly after, and 6 weeks after treatment for the 0.5 and 1.0 Gy groups were 55.7 ± 21.0 and 58.2 ± 23.5 (p = 0.526), 38.0 ± 23.2 and 30.4 ± 22.6 (p = 0.076), and 35.4 ± 25.9 and 30.9 ± 25.4 (p = 0.521), respectively. The mean CPS before, directly after, and 6 weeks after treatment was 8.2 ± 3.0 and 8.9 ± 3.3 (p = 0.239), 5.6 ± 3.1 and 5.4 ± 3.3 (p = 0.756), 4.4 ± 2.6 and 5.3 ± 3.8 (p = 0.577), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the two single-dose trial arms for early (p = 0.366) and delayed response (p = 0.287). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment option for the management of achillodynia. For radiation protection, the dose of a radiotherapy series is recommended not to exceed 3-6 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Tendón Calcáneo/efectos de la radiación , Artralgia/etiología , Artralgia/prevención & control , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Tendinopatía/complicaciones , Tendinopatía/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of two different dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy of patients with benign painful shoulder syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 312 consecutive evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective randomized trial. All patients received radiotherapy with an orthovoltage technique. One radiotherapy course consisted of 6 single fractions in 3 weeks. In case of insufficient remission of pain after 6 weeks, a second radiation series was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either single doses of 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. The endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before, right after, and 6 weeks after radiotherapy using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: The overall response rate for all patients was 83% directly after and 85% 6 weeks after radiotherapy. The mean VAS values before, directly after, and 6 weeks after treatment for the 0.5 and 1.0 Gy groups were 56.8 ± 23.7 and 53.2 ± 21.8 (p = 0.158), 38.2 ± 26.1 and 34.0 ± 24.5 (p = 0.189), and 33.0 ± 27.2 and 23.7 ± 22.7 (p = 0.044), respectively. The mean CPS before, directly after, and 6 weeks after treatment was 9.7 ± 3.0 and 9.5 ± 2.7 (p = 0.309), 6.1 ± 3.6 and 5.4 ± 3.6 (p = 0.096), 5.3 ± 3.7 and 4.1 ± 3.7 (p = 0.052), respectively. Despite a slight advantage in the VAS analysis for the 1.0 Gy group for delayed response, the CPS analysis revealed no statistically significant differences between the two single-dose trial arms for early (p = 0.652) and delayed response quality (p = 0.380). CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment option for the management of benign painful shoulder syndrome. Concerning radiation protection, the dose for a radiotherapy series is recommended not to exceed 3-6 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Dolor de Hombro/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Dolor de Hombro/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of two different dose-fractionation schedules for radiotherapy (RT) of patients with painful elbow syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2006 and February 2010, 199 consecutive evaluable patients were recruited for this prospective randomized trial. All patients received RT in orthovoltage technique. One RT course consisted of 6 single fractions/3 weeks. In case of insufficient remission of pain after 6 weeks a second radiation series was performed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either single doses of 0.5 or 1.0 Gy. Endpoint was pain reduction. Pain was measured before, right after, and 6 weeks after RT by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a comprehensive pain score (CPS). RESULTS: The overall response rate for all patients was 80% direct after and 91% 6 weeks after RT. The mean VAS values before, after and 6 weeks after treatment for the 0.5 and 1.0 Gy groups were 59.6 ± 20.2 and 55.7 ± 18.0 (p = 0.463), 32.1 ± 24.5 and 34.4 ± 22.5 (p = 0.256), and 27.0 ± 27.7 and 23.5 ± 21.6 (p = 0.818). The mean CPS before, after, and 6 weeks after treatment was 8.7 ± 2.9 and 8.1 ± 3.1 (p = 0.207), 4.5 ± 3.2 and 5.0 ± 3.4 (p = 0.507), 3.9 ± 3.6 and 2.8 ± 2.8 (p = 0.186), respectively. No statistically significant differences between the two single dose trial arms for early (p = 0.103) and delayed response (p = 0.246) were found. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective treatment option for the management of benign painful elbow syndrome. For radiation protection reasons the dose for a RT series is recommended not to exceed 3.0 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/radioterapia , Articulación del Codo/efectos de la radiación , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Codo de Tenista/diagnóstico , Codo de Tenista/radioterapia , Adulto , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Síndrome , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Gorham-Stout syndrome (GSS) is a rare, benign idiopathic and progressive disorder causing massive osteolysis due to a vascular hyperproliferation replacing the bony structure. Clinical experience concerning the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) is limited to about 50 of an overall 200 cases reported worldwide. CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old bedridden woman had histologically proven GSS with destruction of the anterior pelvic girdle and received RT for a total dose of 45.0 Gy applied in 5 weekly fractions of 1.8 Gy. In addition, the patient received intravenously 4 mg zoledronic acid once a month. One year after the combined treatment, complete pain relief occurred, and the patient was able to walk without the use of appliances. Imaging studies revealed no progression of the osteolysis but only minimal signs of remineralization. CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with RT and bisphosphonate administration can prevent the progression of osteolysis in GSS. Total doses of 40-45 Gy are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Osteólisis Esencial/radioterapia , Huesos Pélvicos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Difosfonatos/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Infusiones Intravenosas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Limitación de la Movilidad , Osteólisis Esencial/diagnóstico , Osteólisis Esencial/tratamiento farmacológico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de los fármacos , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Huesos Pélvicos/efectos de los fármacos , Huesos Pélvicos/patología , Huesos Pélvicos/efectos de la radiación , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto Joven , Ácido ZoledrónicoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of early stages of benign plantar fibromatosis (Morbus Ledderhose [ML]). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2008, 24 patients (33 sites) with a mean age of 52 years received RT for symptomatic ML. Prior to RT, 19 patients complained of pain and 15 had walking difficulties. 21 patients (28 sites) were irradiated with orthovoltage X-rays and three (five sites) received electron-beam irradiation. The RT protocol consisted of five weekly fractions of 3.0 Gy (15 Gy), repeated after 6 weeks to a total dose of 30 Gy in 20 patients (28 sites). In four patients (five sites), two single fractions of 4.0 Gy were applied, repeated at intervals of 4 weeks to total doses of 24-32 Gy. Primary study endpoints were the prevention of disease progression and the avoidance of a surgical intervention. Secondary endpoints were pain relief, improvement of gait, and patients' subjective satisfaction measured with a linear analog scale (LAS). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 22.5 months, none of the patients experienced a progression of number and size of the lesions or the clinical symptoms. In eleven sites (33.3%) complete remission of cords or nodules occurred, in 18 (54.5%) a reduced number or size was noted, and four sites (12.1%) were unchanged. Pain relief was achieved in 13/19 patients (68.4%), and an improvement of gait abnormalities was noted in 11/15 patients (73.3%). The patients' subjective satisfaction measured by means of the LAS revealed a median improvement of 3.5 points in 22/24 patients (91.6%). Skin or soft tissues toxicities RTOG grade > 2 were not noted. CONCLUSION: RT is effective for treatment of the early stages of ML and may obviate the need for a surgical intervention. Long-term follow-up studies including a larger number of patients are required to define the role of RT in the management of this disorder.
Asunto(s)
Contractura de Dupuytren/radioterapia , Fibroma/radioterapia , Enfermedades del Pie/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Marcha/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Radiodermatitis/etiología , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: After a patterns-of-care study (PCS) in 2003/2004 addressing benign disorders in general, the German Cooperative Group on Radiotherapy for Benign Diseases (GCG-BD) conducted several multicenter cohort studies including the use of radiotherapy (RT) in painful gonarthrosis (GNA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2008, a PCS for GNA was conducted in all German RT institutions using a standardized structured questionnaire. Patient accrual, patient number, pretreatment, pain record, treatment indications, RT technique, and target volume concepts for painful GNA were assessed. In addition, the long-term functional and subjective outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: 238/248 institutions (95.9%) returned the questionnaire: 50 (21%) reported no clinical experience with RT in GNA, while 188 (79%) institutions treated 4,544 patients annually (median 15; range one to 846 cases per institution). Indications for treatment were acute pain symptoms in 18.9%, chronic pain in 95.3%, and treatment-refractory pain in 81.1%. The median total dose was 6 Gy (range 3-12 Gy), with a median single dose of 1 Gy (0.25-3 Gy). 40.4% of the institutions applied two fractions and 51.4% three fractions weekly. RT was delivered with orthovoltage units (25%), linear accelerators (79.6%), and cobalt-60 units (8.3%). 42 institutions evaluated the long-term clinical outcome in a total of 5,069 cases. Median pain reduction for at least 3 months was reported in 60% (5-100%), median pain reduction for at least 12 months in 40% (10-100%), and median persistent pain reduction in 27.8% (10-85%) of the treated patients. In 30% of patients (7-100%), a second RT series was applied for inadequate pain response or early pain recurrence. No radiogenic acute or chronic side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This PCS comprises the largest number of cases reported for RT in painful and refractory GNA. Despite variations in daily RT practice, high response and low toxicity for this treatment in a very large number of painful and refractory GNA cases renders low-dose RT an effective conservative therapy which can be applied prior to surgical procedures.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/radioterapia , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/radioterapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Retratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Calcifying tendonitis is a degenerative inflammatory joint disorder. Pain relief can be successfully achieved with low-dose radiotherapy. It is actually unknown which types of calcifying tendonitis respond to radiotherapy and which do not. The authors tried to get predictive objectives for the response to radiotherapy on the basis of different morphological patterns of calcifications evaluated by X-ray and ultrasound. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1999 and September 2002, a total of 102 patients with 115 painful shoulder joints underwent low-dose radiotherapy. At the beginning of radiotherapy, every shoulder joint was examined with a radiograph in two planes. In addition, sonography was performed before and during therapy. This examination was repeated 6 and 18 months after irradiation. Radiotherapy consisted of two series with a total dose of 6.0 Gy. 29 joints with calcifying tendonitis could be further divided using the sonographic and radiographic classification according to Farin and Gärtner, respectively. RESULTS: Pain relief was achieved in 94/115 joints (82%) at a follow-up of 18 months (median). A different response to radiotherapy was found using the sonographic classification of Farin: calcifying tendonitis type III (n = 18) responded well in contrast to a significantly worse result in type I (n = 11). The radiologic classification did not provide a predictive value. CONCLUSION: Sonographic classification of calcifying tendonitis is predictive for the outcome after radiotherapy. Especially patients with Farin type III calcification will benefit from low-dose radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/radioterapia , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/radioterapia , Articulación del Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Hombro/efectos de la radiación , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor de Hombro/radioterapia , Tendinopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Tendinopatía/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Calcinosis/clasificación , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Pronóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Síndrome de Abducción Dolorosa del Hombro/clasificación , Dolor de Hombro/clasificación , Tendinopatía/clasificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Previous experiments with mice have shown that repeated 1 hour daily exposure to an ambient magnetic field-shielded environment induces analgesia (antinociception). The exposures were carried out in the dark (less than 2.0x1016 photonss-1m-2) during the mid-light phase of the diurnal cycle. However, if the mice were exposed in the presence of visible light (2.0x1018 photonss-1m-2, 400-750 nm), then the analgesic effects of shielding were eliminated. Here, we show that this effect of light is intensity and wavelength dependent. Introduction of red light (peak at 635 nm) had little or no effect, presumably because mice do not have photoreceptors sensitive to red light above 600 nm in their eyes. By contrast, introduction of ultraviolet light (peak at 405 nm) abolished the effect, presumably because mice do have ultraviolet A receptors. Blue light exposures (peak at 465 nm) of different intensities demonstrate that the effect has an intensity threshold of approximately 12% of the blue light in the housing facility, corresponding to 5x1016 photonss-1m-2 (integral). This intensity is similar to that associated with photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds and in mice stimulates photopic/cone vision. Could the detection mechanism that senses ambient magnetic fields in mice be similar to that in bird navigation?
Asunto(s)
Campos Electromagnéticos , Luz , Magnetismo , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Animales , Masculino , Ratones , Ontario , Espectrofotometría , Rayos UltravioletaRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of (153)samarium-ethylene-diamino-tetramethylene phosphonic acid ((153)Sm-EDTMP, a beta and gamma emitter) treatment in the palliation of painful bone metastases from breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 43 women (aged 41-79, mean 60 years) with bone-disseminated breast cancer and bone pain refractory to opioid analgesics received (153)Sm-EDTMP. Karnofsky performance status, pain score (numeric rating scale), analgesic score (World Health Organisation) and blood count were evaluated before treatment and 1 and 3 months after the treatment. RESULTS: Significant pain relief was observed in 51 and 42% of the patients, mild relief in 30 and 30%, and no effect in 19 and 28% of the patients 1 and 3 months after administration, respectively. Mild and transient bone marrow suppression was observed as a side effect of (153)Sm-EDTMP treatment. None of the patients showed grade 4 haematological toxicity and only 1 patient showed grade 3 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria). The majority of patients had grade 1 or 2 haematological toxicity. CONCLUSION: (153)Sm-EDTMP treatment is effective and safe in bone pain palliation in breast cancer. 3 months after administering (153)Sm-EDTMP, pain relief to varying degrees was observed in 72% of patients.The haematological toxicity after (153)Sm-EDTMP treatment was mild and transient.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de la Médula Ósea/etiología , Neoplasias Óseas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Organofosforados/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organofosforados/uso terapéutico , Dolor/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades de la Médula Ósea/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Radiofármacos/efectos adversos , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/radioterapia , Osteoartritis/radioterapia , Periartritis/radioterapia , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Bursitis/radioterapia , Humanos , Osteoartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Periartritis/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radiografía , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Factores de Riesgo , Tendinopatía/diagnóstico por imagen , Tendinopatía/radioterapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two different dose-fractionation schedules for radiation therapy (RT) in patients with painful heel spurs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 130 patients were randomized into two groups: the low-dose (LD) group (n = 65 heels) received a total dose of 3.0 Gy given in two weekly fractions of 0.5 Gy; in the high-dose (HD) group (n = 65 heels), two weekly fractions of 1.0 Gy were applied over 3 weeks (total dose 6.0 Gy). In 24 sites of the HD group and 17 sites of the LD group, a second RT course was given. The results were assessed using a five-level function score which was documented before RT, at the end of each RT course, and at 6 weeks and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, RT led to a highly significant reduction of symptoms in both groups. In the HD group, 31 sites were classified as excellent (score: 90-100), 13 as good (score: 70-85), twelve as moderate (score: 45-65), and nine as poor (score: 0-40). In the LD group, 35 sites were classified as excellent, eight as good, ten as moderate, and twelve as poor. The comparison of the difference of the sum score and the single criteria before RT and at 6 months after RT using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test revealed no statistically significant difference of response to RT between both groups. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective treatment option for the management of inflammatory heel spurs. The dose for an RT course should not exceed 3.0 Gy.
Asunto(s)
Espolón Calcáneo/radioterapia , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Femenino , Espolón Calcáneo/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Static and pulsed magnetic fields have been reported to have a variety of physiological effects. However, the effect of static magnetic fields on pain perception and sympathetic function is equivocal. To address this question, we measured pain perception during reproducible noxious stimuli during acute exposure to static magnets. Pain perception, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood velocity were measured during rest, isometric handgrip, postexercise muscle ischemia, and cold pressor test during magnet and placebo exposure in 15 subjects (25 +/- 1 yr; 8 men and 7 women) following 1 h of exposure. During magnet exposure, subjects were placed on a mattress with 95 evenly spaced 0.06-T magnets imbedded in it. During placebo exposure, subjects were placed on an identical mattress without magnets. The order of the two exposure conditions was randomized. At rest, no significant differences were noted in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (8 +/- 1 and 7 +/- 1 bursts/min for magnet and placebo, respectively), mean arterial pressure (91 +/- 3 and 93 +/- 3 mmHg), heart rate (63 +/- 2 and 62 +/- 2 beats/min), and forearm blood velocity (3.0 +/- 0.3 and 2.6 +/- 0.3 cm/s). Magnets did not alter pain perception during the three stimuli. During all interventions, no significant differences between exposure conditions were found in muscle sympathetic nerve activity and hemodynamic measurements. These results indicate that acute exposure to static magnetic fields does not alter pain perception, sympathetic function, and hemodynamics at rest or during noxious stimuli.
Asunto(s)
Campos Electromagnéticos , Magnetismo , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Umbral del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/fisiología , Sistema Nervioso Simpático/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Efecto Placebo , Dosis de RadiaciónRESUMEN
We assessed the pain-relieving efficacy of static magnetic fields produced by 200 Gauss (G) magnets compared with 50G magnets in a double-blind, randomized, two-phase crossover study in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain. The surface field strengths of the magnets were 200 and 50G. Phase I included four random periods of two-week duration: two periods with 200G, one period with 50G, and one period of "no treatment." The magnets were positioned either vertically or horizontally in standard lumbosacral elastic corsets. Phase II consisted of two five-week periods with the most effective magnet from Phase I and its corresponding 50 or 200G device. The primary outcome was average daily leg pain score (0-10 scale) in each period of Phase II. Thirty-eight of 40 randomized patients completed Phase I, and 28 of 31 Phase II participants completed the study. In Phase I, pain scores did not differ significantly between 200 and 50G magnets. Phase II average leg pain scores tended to be lower with 200 vs. 50G magnets (3.2+/-2.1 for 200G vs. 3.9+/-2.2 for 50G magnets [P=0.08]) after excluding one unblinded patient. The relative treatment effect of the 200G magnets appeared to increase throughout the five-week period. Although these data cannot rule out a chance effect, the positive trends suggest that larger, longer-duration, sham-controlled trials with 200G magnets be considered in patients with chronic lumbar radicular pain.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/prevención & control , Magnetismo/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Radiculopatía/terapia , Ciática/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/diagnóstico , Vértebras Lumbares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dosis de Radiación , Radiculopatía/diagnóstico , Ciática/diagnóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a systemic application of rhenium-186 hydroxyethylidenediphosphonate (Re HEDP) for pain treatment in patients with hemophilic arthropathies. METHODS: Twelve patients with hemophilic arthropathy with at least 3 involved joints with persistent pain were included in this prospective study. A single dose of 15 mCi (555 MBq) Re HEDP was administered intravenously. Before and 12 weeks after treatment, pain assessment was performed using the visual analog scale (VAS). The pain status assessment included the general status, pain of all joints affected, and pain of the 3 mostly involved joints. Furthermore, quality of life was assessed. RESULTS: With regard to the 3 most involved joints, an improvement of the pain symptoms in 25 of 36 (69.4%) joints was observed. With regard to all involved joints a median of 3 joints per patient improved after Re HEDP therapy. General pain status after treatment was 2.0 VAS points lower as compared with pretreatment. The total number of involved joints remained unchanged in 7 patients, increased in 1 patient, and decreased in the remaining 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show an improvement of the pain symptoms of the involved joints 12 weeks after therapy with Re HEDP in patients with hemophilic arthropathy. The only moderate success regarding a reduction of the total number of involved joints is by the fact that despite this improvement most affected joints remained still painful on a lower level after the therapy or due to newly affected joints not painful before initiation of the radionuclide therapy.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia/radioterapia , Artropatía Neurógena/radioterapia , Ácido Etidrónico/uso terapéutico , Hemartrosis/radioterapia , Hemofilia A/radioterapia , Compuestos Organometálicos/uso terapéutico , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Adulto , Artralgia/etiología , Artropatía Neurógena/etiología , Hemartrosis/etiología , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiofármacos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The present study deals with the analgesic effect induced by static magnetic fields (SMF) in mice exposed to the field with their whole body. It discusses how the effect depends on the distribution of the magnetic field, that is, on the specification and arrangement of the applied individual permanent magnets. A critical analysis of different magnet arrangements is given. As a result the authors propose a magnet arrangement recipe that achieves an analgesic effect of over 80% in the writhing test. This is a widely accepted screening method for animal pain and predictor of human experimental results. As a non-drug, non-invasive, non-contact, non-pain, non-addictive method for analgesia with immediate and long-lasting effect based on the stimulus of the endogenous opioid network, the SMF treatment may attract the attention of medical doctors, nurses, magnet therapists, veterinarians, physiotherapists, masseurs, and fitness trainers among others.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Magnetismo/uso terapéutico , Manejo del Dolor , Dimensión del Dolor/efectos de la radiación , Dolor/fisiopatología , Irradiación Corporal Total/métodos , Animales , Masculino , Ratones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The present randomized controlled split mouth clinical study aimed to investigate the efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on pain reduction and healing rate of recurrent aphthous stomatitis. 40 patients with RAS were recruited for this study and RAS ulcerations of each patient were randomly assigned to the control or test group. In the test group, Er,Cr:YSGG laser with non-contact mode was used to irradiate RAS lesions. In the placebo group, RAS lesions were irradiated with the same device without laser emission. Pain was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) while a clinician graded healing of RAS (HRAS). In the placebo group at immediate; scores of VAS presented no statistically significance; in the test group, laser application showed significant pain reducing, at 1st day control. In the test group, a significantly healing effect at 1st day control was observed and this effect was maintained throughout the study. In the placebo group, scores of HRAS were statistically significant at controls on 3, 7, 10days. Statistically significant difference between the scores of VAS and HRAS was found for all control days except day 10 according to the intergroup comparisons. Based on these findings, Er,Cr:YSGG laser application at 0.25W without water may be appropriate to reduce pain and also accelerate the healing of RAS.