Natural history of visceral branch artery dissections and the influence of concurrent aortic dissection on overall and intervention-free survival.

OBJECTIVE: Visceral branch artery dissection (VBAD) is uncommon and may occur with or without an associated aortic dissection (AD). We hypothesized that isolated VBAD would have a more benign clinical course than those with concurrent AD and compared survival outcomes stratified based on aortic involvement. METHODS: VBAD over a 5-year period were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Data related to patient demographics, comorbid conditions, clinical presentation, management (including procedural interventions), and survival were obtained from medical records. Anatomic imaging studies were reviewed to characterize anatomy, including the presence or absence of concurrent AD. Overall survival and intervention-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 299 VBAD were identified, 174 of which were isolated VBAD and 125 were associated with concurrent AD. Seventy-one percent of patients were men, 77% were White, and 85% were non-Hispanic. The mean age was 61.1 ± 14.4 years. The mean follow-up was 53.2 ± 50.0 months. The estimated overall survival was 88.2% and the estimated overall intervention-free survival was 55.6% at 12 months. Isolated VBAD had better overall survival than those with concurrent AD (69.2% vs 32.4%; P < .001). Concurrent AD was also associated with inferior intervention-free survival (57.5% vs 7.3%; P < .001). Acute presentation was associated with decreased intervention-free survival (86.1% vs 13.4%; P < .001). Acute presentation was also associated with decreased overall survival in patients with isolated VBAD (60.8% vs 80.0% at 180 months; P < .001) and inferior intervention-free survival (48.4% vs 69.5% at 180 months; P < .001) in the subgroup of patients with isolated VBAD. Multivariable Cox models identified that age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05, standard deviation [SD]: 0.02; P = .001) was associated with inferior survival and renal dissections (HR: 3.08, SD: 0.99; P = .001) or mesenteric and renal dissections (HR: 3.39, SD: 1.44; P = .004) were associated with inferior intervention-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated VBAD has superior overall and intervention-free survival to those associated with concurrent AD. The absence vs presence of aortic involvement is useful for risk stratification and may support tailored approaches to the frequency of imaging surveillance.

Natural history and long-term outcomes of medically managed Type B intramural hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: Type B intramural hematoma (IMH) is often managed medically, yet may progress to dissection, aneurysmal dilation, or rupture. The aim of this study was to report the natural history of medically managed Type B IMH, and factors associated with progression. METHODS: We reviewed patients with medically managed Type B IMH between January 1995 to December 2022 at a single center. Any patients with immediate surgical or endovascular intervention were excluded. Demographic profiles, comorbidities, imaging, and follow-up details were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 had isolated IMH, and Group 2 had IMH along with aneurysm or dissection at the time of presentation. On follow-up, progression was defined as degeneration to aneurysm/dissection or increase in the thickness of IMH in Group 1. In Group 2, progression was an increase in the size of aneurysm or development of new dissection. RESULTS: Of 104 patients with Type B IMH during the study period, 92 were medically managed. The median age was 77 years, and 45 (48.9%) were females. Comorbidities included hypertension (83.7%), hypercholesterolemia (44.6%), and active smoking (47.8%). Mean Society for Vascular Surger comorbidity score was 6.3. Mean IMH thickness and aortic diameter at presentation were 8.9 mm and 38.3 mm, respectively. Median follow-up was 55 months. Overall survival at 1 year and 5 years was 85.8% and 61.9%, respectively. During follow-up, 19 patients (20.7%) required intervention, more common in Group 2 (Group 1, 8/66; 12.3% vs Group 2, 11/26; 42.3%; P = .001). This resulted in higher freedom from intervention in Group 1 at 1 year (93.5% vs 62.7%) and 5 years (87.5% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Indication for intervention was dissection (n = 4), aneurysm (n = 12), and progression of IMH (n = 3). In Group 1, progression was seen in 25 (37.9%), three (4.5%) remained stable, 29 (43.9%) had complete resolution of IMH, and nine patients were lost to follow-up. In Group 2, 11 patients (42.3%) had progression, seven (26.9%) remained stable, and eight were lost to follow-up. IMH thickness at presentation >7.2 mm is associated with both increased odds of progression (odds ratio, 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.1; P = .03) and intervention (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-36.9; P = .03) during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although many patients with Type B IMH managed medically stabilize or regress, progression or need for intervention can occur in up to 40% of cases. This is associated with the presence of aneurysm, dissection, and IMH thickness. Long-term follow-up is mandatory as late interventions occur, particularly for higher risk patients.

Classification and management strategy of spontaneous carotid artery dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous carotid artery dissections (sCADs) are the common cause of stroke in middle-aged and young people. There is still a lack of clinical classification to guide the management of sCAD. We reviewed our experience with 179 patients with sCAD and proposed a new classification for sCAD with prognostic and therapeutic significance. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from June 2018 to June 2023 of patients with sCAD treated at a large tertiary academic institution in an urban city in China. Based on imaging results, we categorize sCAD into four types: type Ⅰ, intramural hematoma or dissection with <70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅱ, intramural hematoma or dissection with ≥70% luminal narrowing; type Ⅲ, dissecting aneurysm; type ⅣA, extracranial carotid artery occlusion; and type ⅣB, tandem occlusion. We compared the clinical data and prognostic outcomes among various types of sCADs. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients and 197 dissected arteries met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the 179 patients with sCAD was 49.5 years, 78% were male, and 18 patients (10%) had bilateral sCAD. According to our classification, there were 56 type Ⅰ (28.4%), 50 type Ⅱ (25.4%), 60 type Ⅲ (30.5%), and 31 type Ⅳ (15.7%) dissections. During a mean hospitalization length of 11.4 ± 47.0 days, there were nine recurrent strokes (4.6%) after medical treatment, two type Ⅲ dissections (1.0%), seven type Ⅳ dissections (3.6%), all ipsilateral, and one death. Overall, there were seven (3.6%, 1 type Ⅰ dissection, 3 type Ⅱ dissections, 2 type Ⅲ dissections, and 1 type Ⅳ dissection) recurrent strokes and three (1.5%, all type Ⅲ dissections) recurrent transient ischemic attacks in patients treated with just medical therapy during the follow-up period, all ipsilateral, with a mean follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-59 months). These patients did not undergo further intervention due to the high difficulty associated with endovascular treatment (EVT) or the mild nature of recurrent cerebral ischemic symptoms. Twenty-nine type I dissections (51.8%) were completely recanalized after antithrombotic therapy. A total of 19 type II dissections (38%) and 44 type III dissections (73%) received EVT for persistent flow-limited dissections, enlargement of dissecting aneurysms, or aggravation of neurological symptoms despite antithrombotic therapy. Type Ⅳ dissections are more likely to lead to the occurrence of ischemic stroke and presented with more severe symptoms. Eight type IVB dissections (33%) received acute phase intervention due to distal thromboembolism or aggravation of neurological symptoms after medical treatment. In terms of cerebral ischemic events and mortality, there were no statistically significant differences among the four types of sCAD (all P > .05). Favorable outcome was achieved in 168 patients (93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed a novel and more comprehensive classification method and the modern management strategy for sCAD. Antithrombotic therapy is beneficial to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke for stable sCAD. Non-emergent EVT can be an alternative therapeutic approach for patients who meet indications as in type II to IVA dissections. Urgent procedure with neurovascular intervention is necessary for some type IVB dissections. The short-term results of EVT for sCAD are encouraging, and long-term device-related and functional outcomes should undergo further research.

A single-center experience of type B aortic intramural hematoma.

OBJECTIVE: The outcomes of the best medical treatment (BMT) and intervention treatment (INT) in a single-center experience were reported in type B intramural hematoma (IMH). METHODS: From February 2015 to February 2021, a total of 195 consecutive patients with type B IMH were enrolled in the study. The primary end point was mortality, and the secondary end points included clinical and imaging outcomes. The clinical outcomes were aortic-related death, retrograde type A aortic dissection, stent graft-induced new entry tear, endoleak, and reintervention. The imaging outcome was evaluated through the latest follow-up computed tomography angiography, which included aortic rupture, aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm, rapid growth of aortic diameter, newly developed or enlarged penetrating aortic ulcer or ulcer-like projection (ULP) and increased aortic wall thickness. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the association between different treatments. RESULTS: Among the enrolled patients, 115 received BMT, and 80 received INT. There was no significant difference in early (1.7% vs 2.5%; P = 1.00) and midterm all-cause death (8.3% vs 5.2%; P = .42) between the BMT and INT groups. However, patients who underwent INT were at risk of procedure-related complications such as stent graft-induced new entry tear and endoleaks. The INT group was associated with a profound decrease in the risk of ULP, including newly developed ULP (4.3% vs 26.9%; P < .05), ULP enlargement (6.4% vs 31.3%; P < .05), and a lower proportion of high-risk ULP (10.9% vs 45.6%; P < .05). Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of IMH regression between the two groups, the maximum diameter of the descending aorta in patients receiving INT was larger compared with those treated with BMT. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our limited experience, patients with type B IMH treated with BMT or INT shared similar midterm clinical outcome. Patients who underwent INT may have a decreased risk of ULPs, but a higher risk of procedure-related events and patients on BMT should be closely monitored for ULP progression.

Genetic aortopathies: a case-based approach to multidisciplinary program development.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The incorporation of genetic counseling and testing is essential to evaluation and management of thoracic aortic disease in patients under 60 years of age and those with family histories suspicious for heritable thoracic aortic disease and disorders associated with increased risk for acute type-A aortic dissection. RECENT FINDINGS: As many as 20% of individuals with thoracic aortic disease under the age of 60 years have autosomal dominant patterns of inheritance. A considerable number of heritability factors remain undefined for these families. SUMMARY: Genetic aortopathy programs require a collaborative approach including cardiovascular specialists and surgeons, medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and allied healthcare professionals. Comprehensive evaluation and management of these patients includes collection of detailed phenotypic data to inform the broader community and identify new associated and causative genes of interest, genetic modifiers, and other risk factors. These programs optimize outcomes and reduce the overall burden in the population of acute aortic dissection and related comorbidities.

Factors associated with false lumen changes in patients with superior mesenteric artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: False lumen changes (FLCs) are the main reference for the prognosis judgment and treatment plan selection for type IIa superior mesenteric artery dissection (SMAD). METHODS: For this retrospective study, 55 patients with symptomatic type IIa SMAD were included. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was used to explore the hemodynamic basis of FLCs. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to identify clinical, morphological and hemodynamic factors associated with FLCs. RESULTS: The FLCs of patients with successful conservative treatment (n = 29) are significantly higher than those with failed conservative treatment (n = 26) (58.5 ± 21.1% vs 10.9 ± 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Positive correlations were seen between FLCs and the morphological parameters false lumen length (FLL)/dissection entrance length (DEL) and FLL. In terms of hemodynamic parameters, negative correlations were seen between FLCs and time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), vorticity, and high areas of TAWSS and vorticity, whereas positive correlations were seen between FLCs and oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), and high areas of OSI and RRT. Multiple linear regression analysis identified symptom duration (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.96; p < 0.0001), FLL/DEL (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; p = 0.044), and high RRT area (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.48-2.78; p < 0.0001) as predictors of FLCs. CONCLUSION: The clinical predictor symptom duration, morphological factor FLL/DEL, and the hemodynamic factor high RRT area can serve as predictors of FLCs in patients with symptomatic type IIa SMAD.

Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts the clinical outcomes in patients with acute uncomplicated type-B aortic dissection undergoing optimal medical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) provides excellent short-term outcomes during follow up; however, its long-term therapeutic effectiveness is unsatisfactory. This study evaluated the predictive value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for adverse events among patients with acute uTBAD undergoing OMT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database between 2013 and 2020. The primary end point in this study was composite outcomes including aortic intervention, all-cause mortality, retrograde type A aortic dissection (rTAAD) and aortic diameter growth > 5 mm. The patients were divided into high and low SII groups according to the optimal cut-off value of SII as determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to estimate the hazards ratios and identify the predictors of composite outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients with acute uTBAD who underwent OMT were enrolled. One patient died during hospitalisation. At the end of a mean follow-up duration of 51 ± 23 months, 53 (43.1%) patients experienced composite outcomes, 15 patients (12.2%) died, 31 (25.2%) underwent aortic intervention, 21 (17.1%) exhibited diameter growth of > 5 mm, and 2 developed rTAAD. The patients were divided into low SII group (n = 78, 62.9%) and high SII group (n = 46, 37.1%) as per the optimal cut-off SII value of 1449. The incidence of composite outcomes in high SII group was significantly higher than that in low SII (28 [60.9%] vs. 26[33.3%], p < 0.01). Patients with high SII demonstrated significantly higher mortality rate than those with a low SII (11 [23.9%] vs. 5 [6.4%], respectively; p < 0.01). In addition, the high SII group had significantly higher rate of aortic-related reinterventions than the low SII group (16 [34.8%] vs. 15 [19.2%], p = 0.03). Multivariable Cox analyses showed that a high SII score was independently associated with composite outcomes rate (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.78; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term therapeutic effectiveness of OMT alone in patients with acute uTBAD is unsatisfactory. An SII > 1449 at the time of diagnosis is an independent predictor of OMT failure.

Risk factors for one-year mortality following discharge in patients with acute aortic dissection: development and validation of a predictive model in a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: This study was aimed to identify the risk factors that influence the mortality risk in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) within one year after discharge, and aimed to construct a predictive model for assessing mortality risk. METHODS: The study involved 320 adult patients obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) database. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors associated with mortality in AAD patients within one year after discharge and to develop a predictive model. The performance of the predictive model was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). To further validate the findings, patient data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (157 patients) were analyzed. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that gender, length of hospital stay, highest blood urea nitrogen (BUN_max), use of adrenaline, and use of amiodarone were significant risk factors for mortality within one year after discharge (p < 0.05). The constructed model exhibited a consistency index (C-index) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.738. The calibration curve and DCA demonstrated that these indicators had a good degree of agreement and utility. The external validation results of the model also indicated good predictability (AUC = 0.700, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The personalized scoring prediction model constructed by gender, length of hospital stays, BUN_max levels, as well as the use of adrenaline and amiodarone, can effectively identify AAD patients with high mortality risk within one year after discharge.

Management of Spontaneous Isolated Celiac Artery Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous isolated celiac artery dissection (SICAD) is uncommon, with very few series reported in the literature. The present study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with SICAD treated at a single Chilean institution over 20 years. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients from a single academic hospital with SICAD diagnosed between January 2003 and March 2023 was performed. Conservative treatment included antiplatelets, anticoagulation, or both. The normal size of a celiac artery in our population was 7.9 ± 0.79 mm in females and 8.3 ± 1.08 mm in males. We defined a celiac artery with a diameter equal to or more than 12.5 mm as an aneurysmal celiac artery. RESULTS: The cohort included 27 patients; 77.8% (n = 21) were males. The median age was 51.0 years (range: 38-84 years). Fourteen (51.8%) patients presented with aneurysmal dilatation. Fourteen (51.8%) patients were treated with antiplatelets, 6 (22.2%) patients with anticoagulation, and 7 (25.9%) with anticoagulation and antiplatelets. One patient was treated with endovascular therapy due to a pseudoaneurysm of the celiac artery detected 10 days after conservative treatment with antiplatelets. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range: 2-14 days). Complete remodeling was seen in 6 (22.2%) patients, partial remodeling in 10 (37.0%) patients, and no change was seen in 8 (26.9%) patients. Three (11.5%) patients were lost to follow-up. There were no significant differences between treatments and remodeling outcomes (P = 0.729). The median celiac artery diameter of patients with aneurysmal dilatation was 13.5 mm (range: 12.5-20.5 mm). Systemic arterial hypertension was found more commonly in patients who presented with aneurysmal dilatation than in patients without (87.5% vs. 12.5%, respectively, P = 0.016). Mean follow-up was 41.5 months and median follow-up was 16 months (range: 6-204 months). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SICAD can be treated conservatively with excellent outcomes. Hypertension was more commonly found in patients with SICAD and aneurysmal dilatation.

The value evaluation of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate value of Nomogram prediction model based on CTA imaging features for selecting treatment methods for isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD). METHODS: Symptomatic ISMAD patients were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, relevant risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD patients were analyzed, and a Nomogram prediction model for treatment outcome of ISMAD was constructed with risk factors. The predictive value of the model was evaluated. RESULTS: Low true lumen residual ratio (TLRR), long dissection length, and large arterial angle (superior mesenteric artery [SMA]/abdominal aorta [AA]) were identified as independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure (P < 0.05). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) results showed that the area under curve (AUC) of Nomogram prediction model was 0.826 (95% CI: 0.740-0.912), indicating good discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed good consistency between the predicted curve and the ideal curve of the Nomogram prediction model. The decision curve analysis (DCA) analysis results showed that when probability threshold for the occurrence of conservative treatment failure predicted was 0.05-0.98, patients could obtain more net benefits. Similar results were obtained for the predictive value in the validation set. CONCLUSION: Low TLRR, long dissection length, and large arterial angle (SMA/AA) are independent high-risk factors for conservative treatment failure in ISMAD. The Nomogram model constructed with independent high-risk factors has good clinical effectiveness in predicting the failure.

Dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of the superior cerebellar artery: anatomy, clinical presentation, and treatment outcomes.

The management of superior cerebellar aneurysms is still controversial. Although several techniques are available, the deep localization of the lesion and the limited number of cases increase the complexity of decision-making for optimal treatment. Only a few cases of dissecting and fusiform aneurysms of the superior cerebellar artery (SCA) are described in the literature, many of which are without long follow-ups. The study aims to offer an exhaustive retrospective analysis of patients affected by SCA fusiform and dissecting aneurysms treated at our institution from 2008 to 2023, highlighting outcomes and complications. Moreover, a comprehensive narrative review was performed. A total of seven patients were treated at our institution. After a title and abstract screen, fifty-five papers met the criteria for inclusion in the review. In our case series, conservative treatment was proposed as the first therapeutic option in four cases (57.1%), while endovascular treatment (EVT) was in three cases (42.9%). A good recovery was observed in 66% of patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), while every patient without SAH achieved a good clinical outcome. A poor outcome was observed only in one patient with a dissecting aneurysm causing SAH, who also suffered a pontine infarction. In the literature review, conservative treatment was proposed as a first therapeutic option in eleven cases (16.6%), open microsurgical techniques in 19 patients (28.8%), and EVT in 31 patients (46.9%). Fatal outcome was documented in five patients (7.5%), all characterized by the rupture of the vascular lesion, while 6.1% of cases had non-fatal poor outcomes.

Evaluating Variation in the Cardiac Management of Children with Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Disease in the United States.

Hereditary thoracic aortic diseases (HTAD) such as Marfan syndrome (MFS), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) frequently result in complex cardiovascular pathology that can lead to premature death. However, given limited research and lack of detailed pediatric management guidelines, practice in the U.S. is largely guided by personal experience and/or advice from other professionals. A REDCap survey was composed that covered topics including genetic testing, imaging, and medication choice (all in children), among others. After piloting, the survey was distributed via email and advertised on PediHeartNet. Email addresses of providers were obtained through an established aortic research collaborative and a clinic directory offered through The Marfan Foundation. There were 64 survey responses (pediatric cardiologists 66%; geneticists 13%, genetic counselors 6%; the remaining 15% was comprised of a combination of cardiothoracic surgeons, adult cardiologists, adult congenital specialists, combined cardiology and genetics specialist, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and nurse coordinators). The most supported indication for genetic evaluation in a child with mild aortic root dilation was family history of thoracic aortic dissection (100%), in contrast to mild root dilation with no other HTAD features (39% supported, 45% did not, 15% saying it would depend on other factors). The majority would start medical therapy in MFS at an aortic root z-score of 2, however differences existed regarding medication preferences for initiation (47% angiotensin receptor blockers, 36% beta blockers, 17% would not or cannot prescribe medication/defer medication choice to another provider). Variation existed for cross-sectional imaging indications and modality and for exercise restrictions, although on average respondents were more lenient than the Bethesda guidelines. While there are areas of general agreement in the cardiac management of children with HTAD, there are also several areas of considerable variation. This highlights the need for additional study in these areas with the ultimate goal of creating consensus guidelines.

Acute aortic dissection: evidence, uncertainties, and future therapies.

Remarkable progress has become especially apparent in aortic medicine in the last few decades, leading to essential changes in how thoracic aortic dissection is understood and treated. This state-of-the-art review article addresses the mechanisms of acute aortic dissection, explaining the role of its primary entry location, proximal, and distal dissection extension in their clinical presentation and impact on the decision-making process towards the best treatment approach. The latest evidence on novel treatment methods for acute aortic syndromes is presented, and the diverse dissection classification systems that remain uncertain are discussed, which reveals the need for shared terminology and more clarity. Finally, future aspects are discussed in treating acute aortic dissection, such as the endovascular treatment of aortic dissection Type A and biomarkers for acute aortic syndromes.

Consensus statement on the interhospital transfer of patients with acute aortic syndrome: TRAVERSING Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Standardisation of referral pathways and the transfer of patients with acute aortic syndromes (AAS) to regional centres are recommended by NHS England in the Acute Aortic Dissection Toolkit. The aim of the Transfer of Thoracic Aortic Vascular Emergencies to Regional Specialist INstitutes Group study was to establish an interdisciplinary consensus on the interhospital transfer of patients with AAS to specialist high-volume aortic centres. METHODS: Consensus on the key aspects of interhospital transfer of patients with AAS was established using the Delphi method, in line with Conducting and Reporting of Delphi Studies guidelines. A national patient charity for aortic dissection was involved in the design of the Delphi study. Vascular and cardiothoracic surgeons, emergency physicians, interventional radiologists, cardiologists, intensivists and anaesthetists in the United Kingdom were invited to participate via their respective professional societies. RESULTS: Three consecutive rounds of an electronic Delphi survey were completed by 212, 101 and 58 respondents, respectively. Using predefined consensus criteria, 60 out of 117 (51%) statements from the survey were included in the consensus statement. The study concluded that patients can be taken directly to a specialist aortic centre if they have typical symptoms of AAS on the background of known aortic disease or previous aortic intervention. Accepted patients should be transferred in a category 2 ambulance (response time <18 min), ideally accompanied by transfer-trained personnel or Adult Critical Care Transfer Services. A clear plan should be agreed in case of a cardiac arrest occurring during the transfer. Patients should reach the aortic centre within 4 hours of the initial referral from their local hospital. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus statement is the first set of national interdisciplinary recommendations on the interhospital transfer of patients with AAS. Its implementation is likely to contribute to safer and more standardised emergency referral pathways to regional high-volume specialist aortic units.

[Advances in non-invasive treatment of aortic diseases].

With the further development and long-term follow-up of endovascular treatment for aortic diseases, increasing evidence shows that in many cases, there are difficulties in the diagnosis of causes, decision-making of treatment timing, and lack of effective evaluation of treatment prognosis in endovascular treatments. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on non-invasive treatment including prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of aortic diseases. The non-invasive treatment of aortic disease is mainly applied to high-risk populations with aortic dissection, regulating key targets and mechanisms, and adopting drug intervention in advance to achieve the goal of controlling aortic dilation and preventing the occurrence of dissection. It also conducts precise multi omics analysis to determine the optimal intervention timing and treatment strategy, and aims at complications related to aortic disease or endovascular treatment for patients with a positive family history of aortic dilation and those who have developed aortic dissection. Precise regulation can control the progression of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, delay or achieve long-term stable coexistence with aortic disease, and even reverse disease progression and achieve benign aortic remodeling through new intervention vectors. Ultimately achieving the ideal state of complete thrombosis and mechanized healing of the aortic aneurysm or aortic dissection false lumen.

Patient Reported Outcome Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life in Aortic Dissection: a Systematic Scoping Review using COSMIN Methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically identify all patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (quality of life [QOL] instruments or other instrument/methodology) that have been used to date in aortic dissection (AD) and to explore how well these instruments evaluate QOL according to the Consensus based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology or guideline. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library were search on 1st July 2022. REVIEW METHODS: This scoping review was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the COSMIN guidelines for performing systematic reviews of validated PROMs. Studies that reported on any aspect or domain of QOL using a PROM or other instrument or methodology on AD were included. Data synthesis, including psychometric property analysis and risk of bias assessment were performed according to COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS: Forty-five studies, published between 1994 and 2021 reporting on 5 874 patients (mean age 63 years, 70.6% male), were included. A total of 39 PROMs were used, and three studies used semi-structured interviews. The majority (69%) of studies were in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD). The most common PROM used was the SF-36 (51%). Six studies evaluated one or more psychometric properties of a PROM. Only one of these studies was specifically designed as a validation study. No study reported on content validity. Internal consistency was the most evaluated psychometric property. No study evaluated all the psychometric properties according to COSMIN methodology. The methodological quality used to assess these PROMs was judged to be adequate or very good. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the heterogeneity of PROMs or methods used to determine QOL in AD patients. The lack of research regarding a comprehensive evaluation of the psychometric properties of a PROM used in AD highlights the need for the development and validation of a dissection specific PROM. [PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022310477].

False Lumen Intercostal Artery Embolization to Halt Type R Entry Flow in Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of aneurysmal type B aortic dissection often involves thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). However, persistent patency of the false lumen from type R entry flow is common and is associated with late complications including rupture. We describe 9 patients with aneurysmal chronic type B aortic dissections and patent false lumens and 7 despite prior thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The goal of the false lumen intercostal embolization in these patients was to achieve propagation of false lumen thrombosis (FLT) and to prevent spinal cord ischemia (SCI) using a staged approach in the overall treatment of their complex aortic aneurysm. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective review was performed of all consecutive false lumen intercostal embolization procedures; 9 were identified. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic angiograms were compared. We hypothesized that embolization was a safe and feasible treatment option. The primary outcome was procedural characteristics and SCI to establish safety and feasibility. Secondary outcomes included a change in supraceliac patent false lumen length and other perioperative clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 30 of 31 (97%) targeted false lumen intercostal arteries were successfully coiled. Median procedural time was 57 min (interquartile range [IQR] 23-99), median air kerma was 585 mGy (IQR 398-1,644), and median contrast dose was 141 mL (IQR 74-240). After embolization, all patients demonstrated propagation of FLT, with mean false lumen length decreasing by 48% from 13.8 cm to 6.6 cm. There was no mortality associated with this procedure; 2 patients suffered a lumbar drain-related complication; 1 with cerebrospinal fluid leak and 1 with a spinal hematoma that was managed conservatively with no neurological deficit. No other complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, false lumen intercostal coil embolization was technically feasible and did not result in any cases of SCI. The procedures required acceptable amounts of operative time, fluoroscopic dose, and contrast. All patients experienced propagation of FLT and no long-term procedure-related morbidity was noted. More data will be required to ascertain whether this procedure is effective at halting type R entry flow, preventing future type II entry flow, and promoting aortic remodeling over time.

In-hospital recurrence and functional outcome between ischemic stroke caused by intracranial arterial dissection and intracranial atherosclerosis: Retrospective cohort study of the nationwide multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial arterial dissection (ICAD) and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) are often difficult to differentiate, and studies on their background factors and prognosis are scarce. Information on prognosis, including recurrence, is necessary for stroke care, and clarification of epidemiological and clinical differences between the two diseases is important for appropriately handling their heterogeneity. This study aimed to determine the association of ICAD and ICAS with in-hospital recurrence and prognosis and compare their background and clinical findings. METHODS: In this multicenter cohort study, we retrospectively analyzed data from the Saiseikai Stroke Database. Adults with ischemic stroke caused by ICAD or ICAS were included in this study. Patients' backgrounds and clinical findings were compared between the ICAD and ICAS groups. The outcome showed an association of ICAD with in-hospital recurrence of ischemic stroke and poor functional outcome relative to ICAS. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for ICAD with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each outcome. RESULTS: Among 15,622 patients registered in the Saiseikai Stroke Database, 2,020 were enrolled (ICAD group: 89; ICAS group: 1,931). In the ICAD group, 65.2% of the patients were aged <64 years. Vascular lesion location was more common in ICAD with the vertebral artery [42 (47.2%)], anterior cerebral artery [20 (22.5%)], and middle cerebral artery (MCA) [16 (18.0%)], and in ICAS with MCA 1046 (52.3%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses of the association between ICAD and in-hospital recurrence and poor functional outcome yielded a crude OR (95% CI) of 3.26 (1.06-9.97) and 0.97 (0.54-1.74), respectively, relative to ICAS. CONCLUSION: ICAD was associated with a higher in-hospital recurrence than ICAS; however, there was no significant difference in prognosis between the two groups. Differences in background characteristics and vessel lesions may be of interest in these two diseases.

[Advances in the classification and treatment of isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection].

Isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (ISMAD) has attracted more and more clinicians' attention in recent years. Patients onset of ISMAD often present with abdominal pain. The misdiagnosis or miss diagnosis is common because of the non-specific symptoms and signs, which even can endanger lives in serious cases. Imaging classification is of great significance for diagnosis and treatment of ISMAD. The Sakamoto classification and the Yun classification are two classical classified methods. However, with the further study of ISMAD, various new classifications emerge. Conservative treatment was once considered as the preferred. As the rapid development of endovascular therapy and the great progress of new devices, stenting therapy can significantly improve symptoms and achieve satisfactory long-term effects, and be even expected to become the preferred method for clinical therapy of ISMAD. However, the long-term effects of endovascular therapy still need a large number of follow-up data, and complications after stent implantation can't be ignored.

Emergency department visits after acute aortic syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports document a high rate of readmission after hospitalization for acute aortic syndromes (AAS) that include acute aortic dissections, intramural hematomas, or penetrating aortic ulcers. We examined the rate of return to the emergency department (ED) to better understand the utilization of emergent health care services after AAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with AAS admitted to the vascular surgery service from 2004 to 2020 were included. Patients with type A dissections, arch involvement, or chronic aortic pathology were excluded. The primary outcome was ED visits within 90 days of the original hospitalization. RESULTS: The study included 79 subjects (62% men, 38% women; mean age: 64 ± 14 years) with AAS (82% aortic dissections, 11% intramural hematomas, and 6% penetrating aortic ulcers). A total of 54 ED visits related to the AAS occurred within 90 days of the original discharge, each of which incurred a computed tomography angiogram. Twenty-eight (35%) subjects had a mean of 2 ± 2 ED visits, whereas 51 (65%) subjects had no ED visits. Ninety percent (25 of 28) of the first ED visits occurred within 1 month of discharge and 53% (15 of 28) within 1 week. A total of 17 (61%) subjects were readmitted to the hospital from the ED. Four subjects were found to have progression of AAS on imaging studies and underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair during readmission. Comparing subjects who returned to the ED with those who did not, there were no significant differences in demographics, atherosclerotic risk factors except coronary artery disease, type of AAS, number of antihypertensive medications at admission or discharge, operative intervention, length of initial hospital stay, or discharge status. The chief complaints at the first ED visit were pain (n = 17), uncontrolled hypertension (n = 5), syncope (n = 3), and other (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that one in three patients with AAS returned to the ED within 90 days of initial discharge. Although returning subjects had a higher number of readmissions, few had progression of AAS that required intervention. Because the vast majority were readmitted for medical therapy, early and frequent clinic follow-up may help decrease ED visits and readmissions after AAS.