Progress in von Willebrand Disease Treatment: Evolution towards Newer Therapies.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a very heterogenous disease, resulting in different phenotypes and different degrees of bleeding severity. Established therapies (i.e., desmopressin, antifibrinolytic agents, hormone therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding, and von Willebrand factor [VWF] concentrates) may work in some subtypes, but not in all patients. In recent years, progress has been made in improving the diagnosis of VWD subtypes, allowing for more specific therapy. The impact of VWD on women's daily lives has also come to the fore in recent years, with hormone therapy, tranexamic acid, or recombinant VWF as treatment options. New treatment approaches, including the replacement of lacking factor VIII (FVIII) function, may work in those subgroups affected by severe FVIII deficiency. Reducing the clearance of VWF is an alternative treatment pathway; for example, rondaptivon pegol is a VWFA1 domain-binding aptamer which not only improves plasma VWF/FVIII levels, but also corrects platelet counts in thrombocytopenic type 2B VWD patients. These approaches are currently in clinical development, which will be the focus of this review. In addition, half-life extension methods are also important for the improvement of patients' quality of life. Targeting specific mutations may further lead to personalized treatments in the future. Finally, a few randomized controlled trials, although relatively small, have been published in recent years, aiming to achieve a higher level of evidence in future guidelines.

Recombinant von Willebrand factor prophylaxis in patients with severe von Willebrand disease: phase 3 study results.

International guidelines conditionally recommend long-term prophylaxis in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD) and severe and frequent bleeding. As recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF; vonicog alfa) may reduce the frequency of treated spontaneous bleeding events (BEs), we investigated the efficacy and safety of rVWF prophylaxis in adults with severe VWD. Patients with BEs requiring VWF therapy in the past year (on-demand VWF therapy [prior on-demand group] or plasma-derived VWF prophylaxis [pdVWF; switch group]) were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 3 study. The planned duration of rVWF prophylaxis was 12 months; starting rVWF dose was 50 ± 10 VWF: ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) IU/kg twice weekly (prior on-demand group) or based on prior pdVWF weekly dose/dosing frequency (switch group). The primary endpoint was annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of treated spontaneous BEs (sABR) during rVWF prophylaxis. Over the 12-month study period, treated sABR decreased by 91.5% on-study vs historical sABR in 13 patients in the prior on-demand group, and by 45.0% in 10 patients in the switch group (model-based analysis ratio, 0.085; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.021-0.346 and 0.550; 95% CI, 0.086-3.523, respectively). No treated spontaneous BEs were recorded in 84.6% (11/13) and 70.0% (7/10) of patients, respectively. The safety profile of rVWF was consistent with the previously established profile, with no new adverse drug reactions identified. Findings suggest that rVWF prophylaxis can reduce treated spontaneous BEs in patients previously receiving on-demand VWF therapy and maintains at least the same level of hemostatic control in patients who switch from prophylaxis with pdVWF to rVWF, with a favorable safety profile. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT02973087) and www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu (#EudraCT 2016-001478-14).

Hemostatic and thrombotic disorders in the pediatric patient.

This review focuses on significant advances in the field of pediatric hemostasis and thrombosis, with a focus on published studies within the past decade. The evaluation and management of patients with excessive bleeding remain cornerstones of consultative hematology. We will describe the development of validated bleeding assessment tools relevant to pediatric practice, laboratory advances in the evaluation of von Willebrand disease, and a shift in clinical practice regarding the interpretation of normal coagulation studies in patients with significant bleeding phenotypes. There have also been critical advances in the management of hemostatic disorders. This review highlights new treatment paradigms in hemophilia and the rise of multidisciplinary medical homes for women living with bleeding disorders. Given the continued increase in the incidence of thrombosis, particularly in the hospital setting, a full call to arms against pediatric venous thromboembolism is now essential. We will describe recently completed clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants in children and adolescents and ongoing work to elucidate the appropriate duration of therapy for children with provoked thrombosis. Recent work regarding the prevention of pediatric venous thromboembolism is highlighted, including studies of thromboprophylaxis and the development of risk prediction models for hospital-acquired thrombosis. Finally, we review advances in our understanding of thrombotic sequelae and the need for continued refinement of our evaluation tools. Despite the significant advances in pediatric hemostasis and thrombosis over the past decade, many unanswered questions remain for the next generation of investigators.

Acquired bleeding disorders.

Acquired bleeding disorders can develop in previously healthy people irrespective of age or gender but are particularly common in patients with certain underlying conditions. Here, we review recent advances in the management of acquired haemophilia A (AHA), acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS), and patients with hemostatic abnormalities due to chronic liver disease (CLD). Patients with AHA can now benefit from prophylaxis with emicizumab, a therapeutic antibody that mimics the function of activated coagulation factor VIII. The treatment of AVWS remains challenging in many situations and requires careful consideration of the underlying condition. Haemostatic abnormalities in CLD are often compensated by proportional reduction in pro and anti-haemostatic factors resulting in sustained or even increased thrombin generation. Consequently, bleeding in CLD is rarely caused by haemostatic failure and infusion of plasma or coagulation factor concentrates may not be effective.

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome Associated with a Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, Successfully Treated by Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone.

INTRODUCTION: Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) is a rare entity with approximately 700 cases described in the literature. A number of etiologies are responsible for this condition, mainly lymphoproliferative, myeloproliferative syndromes and cardiac diseases. Management is aimed at preventing and treating bleeds, as well as treating the underlying pathology. In the case of a monoclonal gammopathy, there are limited evidence and high heterogeneity only based on old case reports, resulting in poor quality recommendations. It seems essential in 2023 to take into account and offer the new anti-myeloma treatments available. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a patient with an AvWS secondary to an IgG smoldering multiple myeloma, experiencing multiple bleeding, treated successfully with daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, after multiple treatment failure. CONCLUSION: Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone was demonstrated as a rapid and effective treatment for a patient with severe AvWS and multiple bleeding complications.

A Fluorescence Cross-Correlation-Spectroscopy-Based Immunoassay for Rapid, Selective, and Accurate Protein Sizing in Human Plasma, Applied to the von Willebrand Factor.

Multimeric abnormalities in plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) cause bleeding or clotting disorders. Electrophoretic analysis of multimers is used to detect such abnormalities but is qualitative, slow, and difficult to standardize. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is a good alternative but is affected by low selectivity and concentration bias. Here, we report the development of a homogeneous immunoassay based on dual-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) that overcomes these challenges. By performing a mild denaturation treatment followed by reacting with polyclonal antibodies, the concentration bias was drastically reduced. The use of a dual antibody assay improved selectivity. Diffusion times of immunolabeled VWF were measured with FCCS and standardized relative to calibrator measurements. The assay measures size changes in VWF using 1 µL of plasma and less than 10 ng of antibody per measurement and was validated over a 16-fold range of VWF antigen concentration (VWF:Ag), with a sensitivity of VWF:Ag 0.8%. Concentration bias and imprecision were less than 10%. Measurements were unaffected by hemolytic, icteric, or lipemic interference. Strong correlations were obtained with reference densitometric readouts (0.97 for calibrators, 0.85 for clinical samples), and significant differences were found between normal (n = 10), type 2A (n = 5), and type 2B (n = 5) von Willebrand's disease and acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 10) samples (p < 0.01). This FCCS based immunoassay accurately and selectively determines changes in the multimeric status of plasma VWF and may be used as a simpler, faster, and a standardizable alternative for multimer analysis, following further clinical validation in larger cohorts.

Desmopressin (DDAVP) use in patients with von Willebrand disease: A single-centre retrospective review of test response and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Peri-procedural management of von Willebrand disease (VWD) utilizes von Willebrand factor (VWF) concentrates or desmopressin (DDAVP) to increase VWF levels. DDAVP is safe, easily administered, and inexpensive. Currently, a consensus definition for adequate DDAVP response is lacking, and outcomes of peri-procedural DDAVP use in VWD patients are seldom reported. AIM: This single-centre retrospective review aims to characterize DDAVP-responsiveness and assess clinical outcomes of peri-procedural DDAVP use in VWD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed records for all our adult VWD patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent DDAVP challenge testing between January 2007 and January 2022. DDAVP-responsiveness was assessed using six definitions. Bleeding outcomes following procedures covered by DDAVP were classified as excessive or expected bleeding. RESULTS: Eighty-four of 94 (89.4%) patients were DDAVP-responsive by our definition (1-h VWF Activity/Factor VIII ≥0.50 IU/mL). However, the proportion of DDAVP-responders varied from 53.2% to 91.5%, depending on the literature definition used. Ninety-nine procedures pre-treated with DDAVP were performed during the study period. Eighty-six (86.7%) procedures (31 major; 55 minor) were covered with only DDAVP ± tranexamic acid (TXA). Excessive bleeding occurred following 4/31 major procedures and 2/55 minor procedures (both performed in a single patient with a bleeding score of 16). When covered with DDAVP+Factor ± TXA, one each of 10 major and 3 minor procedures (performed in 2 patients with bleeding scores 15-16) resulted in post-procedural bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Peri-procedural DDAVP prophylaxis appears to be effective among individuals with VWD. Beyond DDAVP-responsiveness, patient bleeding history and procedure invasiveness should be considered in determining suitability for DDAVP prophylaxis.

Desmopressin as a hemostatic and blood sparing agent in bleeding disorders.

Intranasal, subcutaneous, or intravenous desmopressin can be utilized to release von Willebrand Factor and Factor VIII into circulation, enhance platelet adhesion and shorten bleeding time. Due to these properties, desmopressin can be effective in controlling bleeding in mild hemophilia A, certain subtypes of von Willebrand disease and in acute bleeding from uremia, end stage renal disease, and liver disease. Its use, however, can be complicated by hyponatremia and rarely arterial thrombotic events. While desmopressin has also been used as a prophylactic blood sparing agent in orthopedic, renal, and hepatic procedures, clinical studies have shown limited benefit in these settings. The purpose of this article is to review the evidence for desmopressin in primary hematologic disorders, discuss its mechanism of action and evaluate its utility as a hemostatic and blood sparing product in various bleeding conditions.

Prophylaxis with recombinant von Willebrand factor in patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease: Results of a post hoc analysis from a phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVES: To describe efficacy/safety of recombinant von Willebrand factor (rVWF) prophylaxis in patients with type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD). METHODS: This post hoc analysis of a phase 3 open-label trial provides a more detailed analysis of adults with type 3 VWD, categorized based on prior treatment at screening: "Prior On-Demand (OD)" (OD VWF; ≥3 documented spontaneous bleeding events [BEs] requiring VWF in previous 12 months) or "Switch" (plasma-derived [pd] VWF prophylaxis for ≥12 months). Annualized bleeding rates (ABRs) were evaluated during 12 months of rVWF prophylaxis versus historical data from medical records. RESULTS: In the Prior OD group (n = 10), mean spontaneous ABR (sABR) for treated BEs was reduced by 91.6% (ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.45) versus mean historical sABR. In the Switch group (n = 8), mean sABR for treated BEs was reduced by 47% (ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.08-3.62). One non-serious adverse event (AE) was considered possibly related to rVWF. No treatment-related, fatal, or life-threatening serious AEs were reported, and no patient developed VWF inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: rVWF prophylaxis reduced sABR in type 3 VWD patients previously treated with OD VWF therapy, and maintained a similar level of hemostatic control in those switching from pdVWF prophylaxis to rVWF prophylaxis.

Neurological Complications Associated with Hereditary Bleeding Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hereditary bleeding disorders may have a wide variety of clinical presentations ranging from mild mucosal and joint bleeding to severe central nervous system (CNS) bleeding, of which intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most dreaded complication. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of specific hereditary bleeding disorders, namely, hemophilia A, hemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease (vWD); their clinical manifestations with a particular emphasis on neurological complications; a brief overview of management strategies pertaining to neurological complications; and a review of literature guiding treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: ICH is the most significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hemophilia. Adequate control of bleeding with the administration of specific factors or blood products, identification of risk factors for bleeding, and maintaining optimal coagulant activity are essential for appropriately managing CNS bleeding complications in these patients. The administration of specific recombinant factors is tailored to a patient's pharmacokinetics and steady-state levels. During acute bleeding episodes, initial factor activity should be maintained between 80 and 100%. Availability of monoclonal antibody Emicizumab has revolutionized prophylactic therapies in patients with hemophilia. Management of ICH in patients with vWD involves using plasma-derived factor concentrates, recombinant von Willebrand factor, and supportive antifibrinolytic agents individualized to the type and severity of vWD. Hemophilia and vWD are the most common hereditary bleeding disorders that can predispose patients to life-threatening CNS complications-intracranial bleeds, intraspinal bleeding, and peripheral nerve syndromes. Early care coordination with a hematologist can help develop an effective prophylactic regimen to avoid life-threatening bleeding complications in these patients. Further research is needed to evaluate using emicizumab as an on-demand treatment option for acute bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia.

Acquired von willebrand syndrome secondary to monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: long-term remission after treatment with bortezomib.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell disorder that can precede the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. MGUS is characterized by the presence of a monoclonal paraprotein without evidence of multiple myeloma or other lymphoplasmacytic malignancies. Even though MGUS is an asymptomatic condition that does not require management strategies other than periodic follow-up to prevent complications, secondary nonmalignant diseases may arise, requiring control of the plasma cell clone. Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare bleeding disorder that occurs in patients with no prior personal or family history of bleeding. It is associated with several other disorders, such as neoplasia, mainly hematological (including MGUS and other lymphoproliferative disorders), autoimmune, infectious and cardiac diseases. At diagnosis, patients usually present with cutaneous and mucosal bleeding, including gastrointestinal bleeding. Here, we report a case of a patient with MGUS who developed AVWS after one year of follow-up. The patient was refractory to glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide and achieved remission only after monoclonal paraprotein was eradicated following treatment with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Our report sdemonstrates that, for refractory cases, eradication of the monoclonal paraprotein may be necessary to treat bleeding complications due to MGUS-associated AVWS.

[Advances in the therapy for von Willebrand disease].

Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by quantitative or qualitative deficiencies in the von Willebrand factor (VWF). VWF concentrate replacement therapy is required in certain situations, such as severe VWD subtype or critical bleeding, even in mild VWD subtypes. A single plasma-derived factor VIII/VWF concentrate has been available for decades in Japan. However, it has a theoretical risk of infectious disease transmission, allergic reactions, and thrombosis. A recombinant VWF (vonicog alfa) was approved by the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in 2020. Vonicog alfa is the only VWF product that contains ultralarge multimer, suggesting both effective bleeding control and excessive platelet plug formation. The efficacy and safety of vonicog alfa have been confirmed by three phases of clinical studies for on-demand usage, elective surgery, and prophylaxis. We also have a successful experience with vonicog alfa with minimal adverse events in two cases (hemostatic treatment in a patient with recurrent epistaxis and prophylaxis for delivery in a pregnant woman).

Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome and Desmopressin Resistance During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: Although COVID-19 is associated with high von Willebrand factor (vWF) parameters promoting thrombosis, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is associated with the development of acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) promoting bleeding. This study was designed to assess both the incidence and severity of AVWS in COVID-19 patients undergoing vvECMO, and the benefit of comprehensive vWF analyses. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: ICU at a tertiary-care center. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven consecutive COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring vvECMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Comprehensive vWF analyses (including sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) were performed before, during, and after vvECMO. In a subgroup of 12 patients with AVWS, effectiveness of treatment with desmopressin was assessed. The patients' mean age was 53 years (range, 23-73), 70% were male, and all had various comorbidities. Following markedly elevated vwf antigen (vWF: Ag; mean, 546% ( sd , 282]), vWF collagen binding capacity (mean, 469% [ sd , 271]), vWF activity (vWF:A; mean, 383% [ sd , 132]), and factor VIII activity (mean, 302% [ sd , 106]), and only borderline decreases in high-molecular-weight (HMW) vWF multimers before vvECMO, all of these variables decreased and HMW vWF multimers became undetectable within hours following initiation of vvECMO. All variables fully recovered within 3-38 hours after discontinuation of vvECMO. During vvECMO, decreases in the vWF:A/vWF:Ag ratio correlated with absent HMW vWF multimers. Desmopressin did not affect vWF parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, AVWS developed soon after initiation of vvECMO. The vWF:A/vWF:Ag ratio was a suitable screening test for AVWS. As desmopressin was ineffective, bleeding during vvECMO-associated AVWS should preferably be treated with concentrates containing vWF.

Successful use of lenalidomide to treat refractory acquired von Willebrand disease associated with monoclonal gammopathy.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) is a rare hematologic disorder characterized by quantitative or qualitative defects of von Willebrand factor (vWF), a protein crucial for normal hemostasis. AVWS has been described in association with several pathologic entities with varied mechanisms. Among these, lymphoproliferative disorders are the most common, with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) being the most frequently reported. AVWS in this setting is commonly associated with the development of bleeding that is clinically challenging to manage due to accelerated clearance of vWF, limiting the utility of many conventional treatment modalities such as DDAVP or vWF/FVIII. We report a case of a 43-year-old male who was sent to our institution for new-onset easy bruising and laboratories concerning for von Willebrand disease (vWD). Further diagnostic workup revealed evidence of an IgG monoclonal gammopathy and findings suggestive of vWF inhibition. Ultimately, he was found to have monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS)-associated AVWS refractory to conventional treatment but responsive to lenalidomide and dexamethasone. This case suggests that lenalidomide may be suitable for patients with AVWS secondary to MGCS.

Influence of blood group and von Willebrand factor on population pharmacokinetics and dose individualization of recombinant factor VIII in Taiwanese patients with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: The large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of recombinant Factor VIII (rFVIII) observed in haemophilia A hinders efficient and cost-beneficial prophylactic regimen initiation. Identification of factors influencing the PK of rFVIII may shed more light on personalised treatment. AIM: This study aimed to develop a population PK model in the Taiwanese haemophilia A and evaluate the current national health insurance (NHI) reimbursement guidelines of Taiwan for haemophilia treatment. METHODS: A population PK analysis was established based on 69 Taiwanese with moderate or severe haemophilia A. A nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM® ) was used to estimate PK parameters and their variabilities. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to evaluate different prophylactic regimens. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best described the rFVIII data. Weight-based allometric scaling was related to clearance and central volume of distribution. Blood type and baseline von Willebrand factor (VWF) were significant covariates for clearance. For single dose simulations, a time achieving target level (> 1 IU/dL) was associated with increasing rFVIII dose and VWF level. The multiple dose simulations showed that > 96.4% of patients with high VWF level (> 200%) had predicted trough level > 1 IU/dL for all dosing regimens (15-40 IU/kg, two to three times weekly). However, for twice weekly dosing, lower percentage (47.62-62.20%) of patients with blood group O and low VWF level (< 50%) achieved a predicted trough level > 1 IU/dL. CONCLUSION: The population PK of rFVIII was successfully developed. Dose adjustment based on blood type and VWF level should be considered.

Off-label use of emicizumab in persons with acquired haemophilia A and von Willebrand disease: A scoping review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Since the approval of emicizumab, a bispecific, factor VIII-mimetic antibody, for use in persons with congenital haemophilia A in 2018, there have been increasing case reports and case series of off-label use of emicizumab in other bleeding disorders, including acquired haemophilia A (AHA) and von Willebrand disease (VWD). AIM: We conducted a scoping review on the use of emicizumab in AHA and VWD, focusing on the clinical presentation and outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus up to July 15, 2021. The following criteria were applied to the studies identified in the initial search: patients had a diagnosis of AHA or VWD; and the study reported on the clinical outcome of emicizumab use. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included in the final review for a total of 41 patients (33 AHA, eight type 3 VWD). The majority of AHA patients and all type 3 VWD patients were started on emicizumab for active/recurrent bleeds. The dosing regimen of emicizumab used varied significantly in AHA patients. All patients had a clinical response to emicizumab use. One AHA patient developed a stroke on emicizumab use in association with concomitant recombinant FVIIa use for surgery. Data on adverse events from emicizumab use were not specifically reported in 24.4% of patients (four AHA, six type 3 VWD). CONCLUSION: Based on published case reports and case series, emicizumab appears to be an effective haemostatic therapy for AHA and VWD. Larger confirmatory clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Efficacy of emicizumab in von Willebrand disease (VWD) patients with and without alloantibodies to von Willebrand factor (VWF): Report of two cases and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the common bleeding disorder with a clinically relevant bleeding prevalence of 1:10,000. von Willebrand disease patients lack both von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII), which are critical for normal haemostasis. The conventional treatment for VWD includes desmopressin and replacement therapy with plasma derived FVIII with VWF concentrates or recombinant VWF. Development of alloantibodies is a rare occurrence, there is a paucity in the literature of treatment modalities in these patients. Not many reports are available in literature on the efficacy of emicizumab in VWD patients with or without alloantibodies to VWF. AIM: To do systematic review of literature on emicizumab in VWD and report our experience of emicizumab in two patients of VWD METHODS: We used electronic search engines till May 2021 in 'Google scholar' and 'PubMed', to collect the case reports or case series on use of emicizumab for management of VWD. Two of our severe VWD patients were successfully treated with emicizumab. A systematic review was performed and the results discussed. RESULTS: The electronic search revealed six case reports using emicizumab for treatment of VWD. Two were in vitro studies and four in patients with VWD type 3 disease. In vitro studies and in VWD patients on emicizumab, showed improvement in thrombin generation and fibrin formation. Among four patients, three had alloantibodies to VWD and one was negative. All these patients were treated with emicizumab for 6-12 m. After starting emicizumab, none of them had spontaneous bleeding requiring treatment. During treatment with emicizumab, one patient had trauma-associated soft tissue hematoma, which was treated with rFVIIa and another patient had bleeding following dental exfoliation treated with Humate P. We treated two of our VWD patients one with and one without inhibitors with emicizumab after failure of other therapies. Both the patients showed marked improvement and continued to remain well and free of bleeding episodes. None of the patients had any thrombosis or thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) during treatment with emicizumab. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this review supports the safety and efficacy of emicizumab in type 3 VWD patients with or without alloantibodies. Further large studies are required to confirm the safety and efficacy of emicizumab in VWD.

Sixth Åland Island Conference on von Willebrand disease.

INTRODUCTION: The sixth Åland Islands Conference on von Willebrand disease (VWD) on the Åland Islands, Finland, was held from 20 to 22 September 2018. AIM: The meeting brought together experts in the field of VWD from around the world to share the latest advances and knowledge in VWD. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The topics covered both clinical aspects of disease management, and biochemical and laboratory insights into the disease. The clinical topics discussed included epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of VWD in different countries, management of children with VWD, bleeding control during surgery, specific considerations for the management of type 3 VWD and bleeding control in women with VWD. Current approaches to the management of acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also discussed. Despite significant advances in the understanding and therapeutic options for VWD, there remain many challenges to be overcome in order to optimise patient care. In comparison with haemophilia A, there are very few registries of VWD patients, which would be a valuable source of data on the condition and its management. VWD is still underdiagnosed, and many patients suffer recurrent or severe bleeding that could be prevented. Awareness of VWD among healthcare practitioners, including non-haematologists, should be improved to allow timely diagnosis and intervention. Diagnosis remains challenging, and the development of fast, simple assays may help to facilitate accurate and rapid diagnosis of VWD.

Towards novel treatment options in von Willebrand disease.

Deficiency or dysfunction of von Willebrand factor (VWF) is associated with a bleeding disorder known as von Willebrand disease (VWD). The clinical manifestations of VWD are heterogeneous, and are in part dictated by the structural or functional defects of VWF. The tools to control bleeding in VWD are dominated by VWF concentrates, desmopressin and antifibrinolytic therapy. In view of these treatments being considered as effective, it is surprising that quality-of-life studies consistently demonstrate a significant mental and physical burden in VWD patients, particularly in women. Apparently, the current weaponry to support the management of VWD is insufficient to fully address the needs of the patients. It is important therefore to continue to search for innovative treatment options which could better serve the VWD patients. In this short review, two of such options are discussed in more detail: emicizumab to correct for the deficiency of factor VIII (FVIII), and the pegylated aptamer BT200 to increase endogenous levels of the VWF/FVIII complex.

Outcomes of long-term von Willebrand factor prophylaxis use in von Willebrand disease: A systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder. Patients with VWD suffering from severe bleeding may benefit from the use of secondary long-term prophylaxis. AIM: Systematically summarize the evidence on the clinical outcomes of secondary long-term prophylaxis in patients with VWD and severe recurrent bleedings. METHODS: We searched Medline and EMBASE through October 2019 for relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies (OS) assessing the effects of secondary long-term prophylaxis in patients with VWD. We used Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool and the RoB for Non-Randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to assess the quality of the included studies. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: We included 12 studies. Evidence from one placebo controlled RCT suggested that VWD prophylaxis as compared to no prophylaxis reduced the rate of bleeding episodes (Rate ratio [RR], .24; 95% confidence interval [CI], .17-.35; low certainty evidence), and of epistaxis (RR, .38; 95%CI, .21-.67; moderate certainty evidence), and may increase serious adverse events RR 2.73 (95%CI .12-59.57; low certainty). Evidence from four before-and-after studies in which researchers reported comparative data suggested that VWD prophylaxis reduced the rate of bleeding (RR .34; 95%CI, .25-.46; very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSION: VWD prophylaxis treatment seems to reduce the risk of spontaneous bleeding, epistaxis, and hospitalizations. More RCTs should be conducted to increase the certainty in these benefits.