Adjuvant Arthroscopy Does Not Improve the Functional Outcome of Volar Locking Plate for Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of adding arthroscopy to osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures (DRF) with volar locking plate (VLP), by Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) 1 year after surgery. METHODS: In total, 186 functionally independent adult patients who met the inclusion criteria (DRF and a clinical decision for surgery with a VLP) were randomized to arthroscopic assistance or not. Primary outcome was PRWE questionnaire results 1 year after surgery. For the main variable, PRWE, we obtained the minimal clinically important difference based on a distribution-based method. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaires, range of motion, strength, radiographic measures, and presence of joint step-offs by computed tomography. Data were collected preoperatively and at +1 and +4 weeks, +3 and +6 months, and +1 year after surgery. Complications were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: In total, 180 patients (mean age: 59.0 ± 14.9 years; 76% women) were analyzed by modified intention to treat. A total of 82% of the fractures were intra-articular (AO type C). No significant difference between arthroscopic (AG) and control (CG) groups in median PRWE was found at +1 year (median AG: 5.0, median CG: 7.5, difference in medians 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0, 7.0, P = .328). The proportion of patients who exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 12.81 points in the AG and CG was 86.4% vs 85.1%, P = .819, respectively. Percentage of associated injuries and step-offs reduction maneuvers was greater with arthroscopy (mean differences: 17.1 95% CI -0.1, 26.1, P < .001) and 17.4 (95% CI 5.0, 29.7, P = .007). The difference in percentage of residual joint step-offs at the postsurgical computed tomography in radioulnar, radioscaphoid, and radiolunate joints was not significant (P = .990, P = .538, and P = .063). Complications were similar between groups (16.9% vs 20.9%, P = .842). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant arthroscopy did not significantly improve PRWE score +1 year after surgery for DRF with VLP, although the statistical power of the study is below the initially estimated to detect the expected difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Distal radius fractures in the superelderly: an observational study of 8486 cases from the Swedish fracture register.

BACKGROUND: The distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture in adults. With an ageing population, the number of wrist fractures in the superelderly (≥ 80 years) is expected to rise. Optimal treatment for displaced DRFs remains controversial, especially in the superelderly group. In addition, basic knowledge of the outcome after a DRF in this heterogenic group is lacking. The aim of this study was to study injury characteristics, treatment and outcome of DRFs in superelderly patients using data from a large national register. METHODS: We used prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register. All distal radius fractures registered between April 2012 and December 2018 in patients ≥ 80 years of age were included. Data on epidemiology, fracture type, trauma mechanism and treatment are registered by the physician treating the patient. Patients are also sent a subjective outcome questionnaire including EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-score) at the time of injury and after 12 months. The 12-month questionnaire was sent to those who had completed the questionnaire at the time of injury. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess differences between treatment methods. RESULTS: Mean age for this population was 86 years (80-105 years), a majority of the patients were female (86.7%). The dominating injury mechanism was a simple fall (74.6%) in the patient's residence. The majority of fractures were AO type A (70%) followed by AO type C (20.9%) and type B (8.6%). The incidence of open fractures was significantly higher in females (2.6%) compared to males (1.5%). A majority of the fractures were treated with a cast (87.5%) with volar locking plate as the second most common treatment method (6.6%). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and the Arm Hand Function Index of the SMFA-score deteriorated somewhat one year after injury compared to pre-injury. PROMs did not correlate to treatment with cast or a volar plate. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide register study provides detailed data on DRFs in the superelderly regarding epidemiology, treatment and self-reported outcome. A good self-reported outcome is possible, but many patients do not recover completely. PROMs did not correlate to type of treatment. The frequency of open fractures was significantly higher in females. The reason for this is unclear but different skin thickness in older males versus females may be one explanation.

Forearm Fractures: Diagnosis and Contemporary Treatment Strategies.

Diaphyseal forearm fractures represent a spectrum of injury patterns that include isolated radial shaft fractures, isolated ulnar shaft fractures, both-bone forearm fractures, Galeazzi fracture-dislocations, and Monteggia fracture-dislocations. Although less common than distal radius fractures, diaphyseal forearm fractures are still a frequently encountered clinical entity seen by orthopaedic surgeons, both as isolated injuries and in the patient with polytrauma. It is important to review the epidemiology of diaphyseal forearm fractures and the classification systems used to describe them, as well as to discuss the principles of the initial evaluation and management of these fractures. It is important to know the indications for nonsurgical and surgical management, along with the goals of surgical management, options for internal fixation, and surgical approaches to the forearm.

The incidence of distal radius fractures in a Swedish pediatric population - an observational cohort study of 90 970 individual fractures.

BACKGROUND: 40-50 % of all boys and 30-40 % of girls suffer from at least one fracture during childhood. A quarter of these fractures affects the wrist, making it the worst affected part of the body. Children often sustain the injury during play or sport activities. There has been a lifestyle change among European children during the last decades, and there is reason to believe that fracture incidence is changing. METHODS: For the purpose of this observational cohort study registry data was retrieved from the Swedish National Patient Register for all pediatric patients registered with a distal radius fracture during the period 2005-2013. Incidence rates were calculated for each year using data from Statistic Sweden on population size by age and gender. RESULTS: 90 970 distal radius fractures were identified. The mean age at the time of fracture was 10 years. In ages 10-17 the proportion of male patients was significantly larger. Seasonal variations were detected with peak incidences in May and September. A decreasing total fracture incidence was observed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of distal radius fractures in a population 0-17 years in Sweden was higher among male than in female patients. The incidence was lower in 2008-2013 as compared to 2005. Further studies are necessary to reveal if the incidence will continue to decrease.

Common Fractures of the Radius and Ulna.

Fractures of the radius and ulna are the most common fractures of the upper extremity, with distal fractures occurring more often than proximal fractures. A fall onto an outstretched hand is the most common mechanism of injury for fractures of the radius and ulna. Evaluation with radiography or ultrasonography usually can confirm the diagnosis. If initial imaging findings are negative and suspicion of fracture remains, splinting and repeat radiography in seven to 14 days should be performed. Incomplete compression fractures without cortical disruption, called buckle (torus) fractures, are common in children. Greenstick fractures, which have cortical disruption, are also common in children. Depending on the degree of angulation, buckle and greenstick fractures can be managed with immobilization. In adults, distal radius fractures are the most common forearm fractures and are typically caused by a fall onto an outstretched hand. A nondisplaced, or minimally displaced, distal radius fracture is initially treated with a sugar-tong splint, followed by a short-arm cast for a minimum of three weeks. It should be noted that these fractures may be complicated by a median nerve injury. Isolated midshaft ulna (nightstick) fractures are often caused by a direct blow to the forearm. These fractures are treated with immobilization or surgery, depending on the degree of displacement and angulation. Combined fractures involving both the ulna and radius generally require surgical correction. Radial head fractures may be difficult to visualize on initial imaging but should be suspected when there are limitations of elbow extension and supination following trauma. Treatment of radial head fractures depends on the specific characteristics of the fracture using the Mason classification.

Pediatric Radial Neck Fractures: Which Ones Can Be Successfully Closed Reduced in the Emergency Department?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to examine pediatric patients with a radial neck fracture and determine the factors associated with a failed closed reduction (CR) in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A total of 70 patients with acute radial neck fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: age 18 years or younger at time of injury, diagnosis of radial neck fracture without other associated elbow fractures, an attempt at CR with manipulation in the ED or immediate surgery, open proximal radial physis, and appropriate imaging to categorize the injury. Charts were reviewed and demographic data was obtained. Initial injury films were reviewed and the Judet classification was used to define fracture types/categories. RESULTS: CR was attempted on 41 patients. Twenty-nine patients went straight to surgery without a CR attempt. Compared with patients that had an attempted CR in the ED, patients that went straight to surgery had longer mean time from injury to ED presentation (5.6 d; P=0.0001), greater mean fracture angulation (55.0 degrees; P=0.001), and greater fracture translation (46.2%; P=0.001). When analyzing the patients that had a CR attempted in the ED, univariate statistical analysis demonstrated that ≥Judet 4 classification (P=0.03), greater amounts of fracture angulation (P=0.003), and a treatment delayed >24 hours from injury (P=0.007) were significant risk factors for failure of CR in the ED. Zero (0/10) patients with fracture angulation ≥60 degrees had a successful CR. Only 1/14 patients presenting >24 hours after injury had a successful CR in the ED. CONCLUSIONS: Circumventing sedation in the ED, and instead splinting for a planned surgical intervention may be a more efficient treatment method for pediatric radial neck fractures that present to the ED>24 hours after injury and/or have angulations ≥60 degrees. Adopting this new strategy may save time, reduce costs, and avoid possible harm/complications associated with sedation in the ED. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic.

Role of the interosseous membrane in post-traumatic forearm instability: instructional review.

PURPOSE: In the last two decades, a strong interest on the interosseous membrane (IOM) has developed. METHODS: The authors present a review of the new concepts regarding the understanding of forearm physiology and pathology, with current trends in the surgical management of these rare and debilitating injuries. RESULTS: Anatomical and biomechanical studies have clarified the anatomy of forearm constrains and their role in forearm longitudinal and transverse stability. The radial pull test, a new intraoperative test, has been developed that might increase the detection on IOM injuries. The forearm is now considered a "functional unit" and, consequently, a new classification has been proposed. Uncommon variants and rare patterns of forearm fracture dislocations have been reported in the literature and could not be classified to those commonly referred to using eponyms (Monteggia, Galeazzi, Essex-Lopresti). The new Artiaco et al. classification includes all injury patterns, thus avoids confusion in the nomenclature, and helps surgeon with detection of lesions and guiding surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Based on the new classification and after current literature review, authors propose a management flowchart for treatment of forearm instability injuries.

Case Series of All-Arthroscopic Treatment for Terrible Triad of the Elbow: Indications and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of all-arthroscopic treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow, a combination of elbow dislocation, radial head dislocation, and coronoid process fracture, and its complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients with terrible triad who underwent all-arthroscopic treatment between January 2011 and December 2016. All-arthroscopic treatment was performed in the unstable elbows after manual reduction. Clinical evaluation was performed at least 2 years postoperatively. Patients with another fracture in the upper extremity and previous fracture of the affected elbow were excluded. A radial head fracture that was stable enough to reduce or involved less than 25% of the articular surface for partial excision and Regan-Morrey classification type I and type II coronoid process fractures were treated arthroscopically. Range of motion, radiologic outcomes, surgical complications, and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score were evaluated at the final follow-up. The Mann-Whitney test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients met the inclusion criteria, and the average age was 47.6 years. Coronoid process fractures were fixed in all patients, by use of Kirschner wires in 15 (62.5%) and pullout sutures in 9 (37.5%). Radial head fractures were treated using screw or K-wire fixation in 4 patients (16.7%); only the fragment of the fracture was resected in 11 patients (45.8%). In all 24 cases (100%), the lateral collateral ligaments were repaired. At the final follow-up, the mean flexion contracture angle was 4.8° ± 1.1° and the mean flexion angle was 132.5° ± 6.3°. Clinical scores were satisfactory, with a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 93 points. However, nonunion of coronoid fractures was observed in 4 patients (16.7%). There was 1 case of pin-site irritation. CONCLUSIONS: All-arthroscopic treatment for the terrible triad can provide an excellent safety profile without the need for a large incision if the indications are met. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Improving Quality in the Treatment of Pediatric Forearm Fractures: Minimizing the Need for Repeat Intervention With Long-arm Extension Casting.

PURPOSE: Repeat intervention for pediatric forearm fractures after closed manipulation is as high as 46% with flexed elbow (FE) long-arm casts. Casting with the elbow extended (EE) has been advocated as an alternative technique. We documented outcomes of patients treated with closed manipulation and casting with EE long-arm casts for displaced, diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts for patients who had sedated manipulations and casting for closed, diaphyseal forearm fractures. Open fractures, immediate surgical intervention, metabolic bone disease, recurrent fractures, and Monteggia injuries were excluded. Closed manipulations were performed by orthopaedic residents assisted by cast technicians, with sedation provided by emergency department physicians. Radiographic angulation and displacement of the radius and ulna on immediate postreduction radiographs and all follow-up radiographs were recorded. Patients requiring repeat intervention were compared with those who did not by using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Of 86 patients (7.2±2.8 y) available for analysis, 82 (95.3%) completed treatment after a single-sedated manipulation and placement of an EE long-arm cast. There were no malunions or nonunions. The average follow-up was 50 days. Four (4.7%) patients required repeat interventions (2 had surgery, 1 had a repeat sedated manipulation, and 1 had a nonsedated manipulation). There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, laterality, fracture position in the diaphysis, or immediate postreduction angulation of the radius or ulna. A literature review showed average repeat intervention rates of 14.9% (range, 0% to 45.9%) for FE casts and 3.3% (range, 0% to 15%) for EE casts. CONCLUSIONS: There was a low rate of repeat interventions (4.7%) in patients with EE casts compared with historical rates for FE casts. Improving the quality of health care involves identifying and implementing practices that provide the best outcomes at the lowest costs. The use of EE long-arm casts following closed manipulation of pediatric forearm fractures may decrease the rate of repeat manipulation or surgery compared with conventional FE casts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Intra-articular Radial Head Fractures: A Deceptive Type of Injury.

BACKGROUND: Isolated intra-articular radial head (IARH) fractures in skeletally immature patients represent a rare injury. Despite their initial benign radiologic appearance, these fractures are at risk for progressive radial head subluxation and may end with degenerative irreversible changes of the radiocapitellar joint. The aim of this study is to highlight the seriousness of these injuries and the importance of early diagnosis and a proper follow-up to achieve optimal outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients with IARH fractures treated at our institution between 2011 and 2016. All patients presented with Salter-Harris types III or IV fracture. Five of 6 fractures were initially undisplaced. Treatment, clinical, and radiographic results were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment: patients included in group A were treated conservatively, whereas patients of group B were treated with early surgery. The final functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES). The Broberg-Morrey classification was used for the radiographic results. RESULTS: Group A included 3 patients (average age, 11±2 y). They developed an initially missed posterior subluxation of the radiocapitellar joint that caused to all of them a painful elbow and limited range of motion (ROM). Despite rescue surgery, they all presented with limited ROM at the final follow-up, although no functional limitations (OES, 46.3±2.9). The radiographs showed early degenerative changes. Group B included 3 patients (average age, 11±1 y) all treated surgically within 1 week from the injury. They showed no limitation of ROM and good functional (OES, 47.7) and radiologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: IARH fractures in skeletally immature children are deceptive injuries which are often underestimated. Surgeons should be aware of these fractures, especially when a discrepancy between the clinical signs and symptoms, and the radiologic appearance exists, as this may be the only red flag that allows their identification in the acute setting. An early and accurate diagnosis followed by prompt and more aggressive treatment when necessary is mandatory for successful results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

[Diagnosis of upper arm, elbow, and proximal lower arm fractures]. / Frakturdiagnostik an Oberarm, Ellenbogen und proximalem Unterarm.

The complex anatomy of the elbow joint enables a wide range of movement and complex functions in everyday and professional life. Typical injuries of this joint include a variety of different pathologies. Due to overlaying structures in plain radiographs, diagnosis of injuries to the elbow joint places high demands on the treating physicians and often needs further diagnostic imaging. The following article will give an overview of the most common of these injuries and their diagnosis.

Improved precision of radiographic measurements for distal radius fractures after a technique-teaching tutorial.

Background: For the management of distal radius fractures, surgical decision-making depends on radiographic measurements of indicators including radial inclination (RI), ulnar variance (UV) and radial tilt (RT). Evaluation of the inter- and intrarater reliability of surgeons' measurements of these criteria has been limited. Methods: Twelve physicians were invited to participate in this study. Anonymously, they measured RI, UV and RT on 30 digitally stored radiographs of distal radius fractures on 3 occasions, each at least 1 week apart, using online measuring tools. After taking the third set of measurements, the participants were given a tutorial by the senior author (G.J.) on a single technique to measure all 3 indicators. The participants then took 3 more sets of measurements using only the technique they had been taught. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate interrater reliability each week. Multiple logistic regression was used to calculate the effect of the tutorial, controlling for week of study along with reader (participant) and patient variance. Results: The ICCs indicated that the participants' measurement precision improved promptly after the tutorial, and this improvement was sustained through subsequent readings. The odds of an "accurate" measurement (within 2° of the senior author's measurements for RI, 1 mm for UV and 4° for RT) was 1.7 times higher for RI, 2.7 times higher for UV and 2.3 times higher for RT after the tutorial; all of these results were statistically significant. Conclusion: Surgeons ought to be familiar with a method to reproducibly measure the indicators used in the published guidelines for surgical intervention. The tutorial on a single standardized technique for online measurement of RI, UV and RT in distal radius fractures improved measurement precision.

Contexte: Pour la prise en charge des fractures du radius distal, la prise de décisions chirurgicales dépend de la mesure de plusieurs indicateurs sur les images radiographiques : l'inclinaison radiale (IR), la variance ulnaire (VU) et l'inclinaison sagittale du radius (ISR). La fiabilité interévaluateurs et intra-évaluateur des mesures de ces critères par les chirurgiens a été peu étudiée. Méthodes: Nous avons invité 12 médecins à participer à l'étude. En tout anonymat, ils ont déterminé l'IR, la VU et l'ISR au moyen d'outils de mesure en ligne sur 30 radiographies numérisées de fractures du radius distal. Ils ont répété l'exercice à 3 reprises, à au moins 1 semaine d'intervalle. Après la troisième série, les participants ont suivi un tutoriel de l'auteur principal (G. J.) sur une technique qui peut à elle seule mesurer les 3 indicateurs. Les participants ont ensuite fait 3 autres séries de mesures en utilisant seulement cette technique. Nous avons évalué la fiabilité interévaluateurs pour chaque semaine à partir des coefficients de corrélation intraclasse (CCI). De plus, nous avons calculé l'effet du tutoriel par régression logistique multiple, en tenant compte de la semaine de l'étude et de la variation selon les lecteurs (participants) et les patients. Résultats: Les CCI indiquent que la précision des mesures s'est améliorée rapidement après le tutoriel; cette amélioration a d'ailleurs persisté tout au long des séries subséquentes. La probabilité d'une mesure « exacte ¼ (dont l'écart par rapport aux mesures de l'auteur principal est inférieur à 2° pour l'IR, à 1 mm pour la VU et à 4° pour l'ISR) était 1,7 fois plus grande pour l'IR, 2,7 fois plus grande pour la VU et 2,3 fois plus grande pour l'ISR après le tutoriel. Tous ces résultats sont statistiquement significatifs. Conclusion: Les chirurgiens doivent connaître une méthode de mesure reproductible des indicateurs utilisés dans les directives cliniques publiées pour guider l'intervention chirurgicale. Le tutoriel sur la technique normalisée de mesure en ligne de l'IR, de la VU et de l'ISR dans les cas de fracture du radius distal a amélioré la précision des mesures.

Indications, surgical approach, reduction, and stabilization techniques of distal radius fractures.

Distal Radius fractures (DRF) are one of the most common injuries in the upper extremity and incidence is expected to rise due to a growing elderly population. The complex decision to treat patients operatively or conservatively depends on a large variety of parameters which have to be considered. No unanimous consensus has been reached yet, which operative approach and fixation technique would produce the best postoperative functional results with lowest complication rates. This article addresses the available evidence for indications, approaches, reduction, and fixation techniques in treating DRF.

Corrective osteotomy after malunited distal radius fractures.

Posttraumatic malunion or secondary dislocation can cause wrist joint incongruency. Uncorrected malalignment increases the risk of secondary degenerative changes and chronic pain. Therefore, early correction using the available fixed-angle devices, cancellous bone grafting only becomes necessary in larger bony defects. Premounting the plate through a palmar approach with regard to the desired correction angles leads to predictable results by precise correction. In case of posttraumatic growth arrest with larger discrepancy of the radius and the ulna, a two-staged procedure is advisable.

Biomechanical considerations on a CT-based treatment-oriented classification in radius fractures.

A wide range of different classifications exist for distal radius fractures (DRF). Most of them are based on plane X-rays and do not give us any information on how to treat these fractures. A biomechanical understanding of the mechanical forces underlying each fracture type is important to treat each injury specifically and ensure the optimal choice for stabilization. The main cause of DRFs are forces acting on the carpus and the radius as well as the position of the wrist in relation to the radius. Reconstructing the mechanism of the injury gives insight into which structures are involved, such as ruptured ligaments, bone fragments as well as the dislocated osteoligamentous units. This article attempts to define certain key fragments, which seem crucial to reduce and stabilize each type of DRF. Once the definition is established, an ideal implant can be selected to sufficiently maintain reduction of these key fragments. Additionally, the perfect approach is selected. By applying the following principles, the surgeon may be assisted in choosing the ideal form of treatment approach and implant selection.

Ulnar shortening osteotomy as a treatment of symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome after malunited distal radius fractures.

A malunited distal radius fracture can lead to symptomatic ulnar impaction syndrome, which is a common cause for ulnar-sided wrist pain. If conservative treatment fails and symptoms persist after an arthroscopic ulnocarpal debridement, ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO) is the treatment of choice. Since the first USO described by Milch in 1941 after a malunited Colles fracture, many techniques have been described varying in surgical approach, type of osteotomy and osteosynthesis material used. Many studies demonstrated good to very good functional results after USO, reporting, however, a delayed union or non-union rate up to 18%. A modern, low profile, locking plate showed in our short-term study very good functional results and no implant-associated complications, in particular no non-union.

Arthroscopic assisted treatment of distal radius fractures and concomitant injuries.

Wrist arthroscopy is mainly used to assist fracture reduction and fixation and to diagnose and treat concomitant injuries mainly to the scapholunate (SL), lunotriquetral (LT) ligament and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC). Arthroscopy is beneficial in improving anatomical reduction of fracture steps and gaps in intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs). Yet, the literature that the functional outcome correlates with the use of arthroscopy, is limited. Non-surgical treatment and immobilization is recommended for Geissler grade I-III Sl-ligament injuries, while open reduction, ligament suture and/or K-wire pinning is mandatory for complete ligament tears according to Geissler grade IV. This manuscript describes the current literature and gives insight into the authors' opinions and practice.

[Occult scaphoid fractures: current evidence and diagnostic algorithm]. / Die okkulte Skaphoidfraktur: aktuelle Evidenz und diagnostischer Algorithmus.

Scaphoid fractures are frequent but are overlooked in 20-40% of cases on initial radiographs. In so-called occult scaphoid fractures, i.e. clinical scaphoid fractures with negative X­ray diagnostics, the hand of the patient is often empirically immobilized with a cast and the X­ray diagnostics repeated 10 days later. Based on the current literature the authors propose a diagnostic algorithm that incorporates various patient characteristics and socioeconomic aspects and suggests a possible follow-up treatment. For high-demand and manually working patients, timely advanced diagnostic imaging may be medically and socioeconomically meaningful. Pensioners and patients with low manual demands, however, can be treated according to the traditional algorithm. Additional use of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostics with or without intra-articular contrast agent might be helpful if concomitant soft tissue injuries are suspected.

Treatment of distal radius fractures with palmar plates and locking screws. Comparisson of two different types of plate.

Various plating systems are available to fix distal radius fractures, each with a specific design. The purpose of this study was to compare radiological outcome and complications of the Variable Angle LCP Plate 2.4-mm (DePuy Synthes) with the VariAx volar locking plate (Stryker). One hundred patients (103 wrists) operated on for a distal radius fracture were retrospectively reviewed with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Seventy-three wrists were treated with a DePuy Synthes plate and 30 with a VariAx plate. The overall complication rate was 32%. Nineteen cases underwent revision surgery, 18 had malunion and 3 complex regional pain syndrome. Complicaton rate was 43% with DePuy Synthes plates and 27% with Variax plates, but the difference was not significant.

Prognostic Value of Pain Sensitization During Early Recovery After Distal Radius Fracture in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of pain sensitization in the early recovery of distal radius fractures (DRFs) on the occurrence and prognosis of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I. METHODS: We enrolled 58 patients who were diagnosed with CRPS I based on Budapest criteria within six months after sustaining DRF; they were age- and gender-matched with 58 patients with DRF who did not have CRPS I. We commonly measured patients' pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in the forearm and administered a Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) when patients complained of pain with numeric rating scale ≥4 at three-month follow-up. Participants were followed up three, six, and 12 months after injury, and the symptoms and sign of CRPS were evaluated at each follow-up. RESULTS: Patients with CRPS I were more likely to have sustained high-energy injuries, had severe fractures, and had significantly higher PSQ scores and lower PPTs than the age- and gender-matched controls. At 12 months after injury, CRPS symptoms improved in 52% (30/58) of patients who had been diagnosed with CRPS I at three months after injury. The initial degree of pain sensitization and high-energy injury were associated with persistence of CRPS symptoms up to 12 months after initial injury. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRPS I after DRF exhibited significantly higher pain sensitization in the early post-trauma period, and the degree of initial pain sensitization and high-energy injuries were associated with prolonged CRPS I signs and symptoms up to one year after initial injury.