RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which cigarette smoking increases the risk of respiratory disease have been studied. However, less is known about risks of respiratory symptoms and outcomes associated with smoking cigars, and risks by cigar types have not been previously explored. The aim of this study was to examine associations between cigar use, including traditional cigars, cigarillos, filtered cigars, and dual cigar and cigarette use, and functionally important respiratory symptoms (FIRS), lifetime asthma diagnosis, uncontrolled asthma, and new cases of FIRS. METHODS: Data from Waves 2-5 (2014-19) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, a nationally representative longitudinal study, were analyzed in two ways. For cross-sectional analysis, the analytic sample included adults 18 and older at each wave, resulting in 44,040 observations. Separately, longitudinal analyses were assessed among adults 18 and older at Wave 2, resulting in 7,930 individuals. Both analyses excluded adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or non-asthma respiratory disease. RESULTS: Current established cigarillo smokers had higher odds of having FIRS (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.72; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.74) compared to never smokers of cigarillos and cigarettes, after adjusting for covariates. Current established filtered cigar smokers had higher odds of asthma diagnosis (AOR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.66) while current established dual smokers of filtered cigars and cigarettes had higher odds of uncontrolled asthma (AOR: 5.13; 95% CI: 1.75, 15.02) compared to never smokers of filtered cigars or cigarettes. Both current established cigar smokers and current established dual smokers of cigarettes and cigars had higher odds of new FIRS compared to never cigar or cigarette smokers (AORs: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.02, 2.60 for exclusive cigars and 2.55; 95% CI 1.57, 4.14 for dual smokers). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that cigar smokers or dual smokers of cigars and cigarettes have greater odds of FIRS, asthma, and uncontrolled asthma and that new incidence of FIRS is higher among any cigar smokers compared to never cigar or cigarette smokers. Understanding health impacts associated with cigar use provides information for supporting policy development, as well as for designing clinical interventions focused on smoking cessation for cigars.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios Transversales , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/diagnóstico , Fumadores , Productos de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cigar use among adults in the United States has remained relatively stable in the past decade and occupies a growing part of the tobacco marketplace as cigarette use has declined. While studies have established the detrimental respiratory health effects of cigarette use, the effects of cigar use need further characterization. In this study, we evaluate the prospective association between cigar use, with or without cigarettes, and asthma exacerbation. METHODS: We used data from Waves 1-5 (2013-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study to run generalized estimating equation models examining the association between time-varying, one-wave-lagged cigarette and cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation among US adults (18+). We defined our exposure as non-established (reference), former, exclusive cigarette, exclusive cigar, and dual use. We defined an asthma exacerbation event as a reported asthma attack in the past 12 months necessitating oral or injected steroid medication or asthma symptoms disrupting sleep at least once a week in the past 30 days. We adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, household income, health insurance, established electronic nicotine delivery systems use, cigarette pack-years, secondhand smoke exposure, obesity, and baseline asthma exacerbation. RESULTS: Exclusive cigarette use (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.54) and dual use (IRR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08-1.85) were associated with a higher rate of asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use, while former use (IRR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.80-1.28) and exclusive cigar use (IRR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.42-1.17) were not. CONCLUSION: We found no association between exclusive cigar use and self-reported asthma exacerbation. However, exclusive cigarette use and dual cigarette and cigar use were associated with higher incidence rates of self-reported asthma exacerbation compared to non-established use. Studies should evaluate strategies to improve cigarette and cigar smoking cessation among adults with asthma who continue to smoke.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Humanos , Asma/epidemiología , Asma/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/efectos adversos , Fumar Cigarrillos/tendencias , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto Joven , Estudios de Cohortes , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Adolescente , Progresión de la Enfermedad , AncianoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Over half of US adults who smoke cigars use flavored cigars, illustrating their broad appeal; however, their long-term impact on cigar and cigarette use is unknown. METHODS: Using restricted data from Waves 1-5 (2013-2019) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study, we investigated cross-sectional patterns and longitudinal transition rates of unflavored and flavored cigar use with and without cigarettes among a nationally representative sample of US adults. RESULTS: Proportionally, more adults who used flavored cigars without or with cigarettes were younger and female. More adults with exclusive cigar use were non-Hispanic Black. More adults with dual use had lower educational attainment. The median number of cigars smoked daily and tobacco dependence was highest among adults who used flavored cigars with cigarettes. Only 14.6% of adults with exclusive flavored cigar use at Wave 1 continued their use to Wave 5, with most transitioning to non-current (46.4%) or exclusive cigarette use (22.9%). Likewise, 13.8% of adults with dual flavored cigar and cigarette use at Wave 1 continued their use to Wave 5, with 57.6% transitioning to exclusive cigarette use and 19.7% transitioning to non-current use. Comparatively, 72.9% of adults with exclusive cigarette use continued their use to Wave 5, while 23.6% transitioned to non-current use. CONCLUSION: Adult cigar use was less stable than cigarette use, particularly among those who use flavored cigars. Future research should investigate whether these transition patterns between flavored and unflavored cigar and cigarette use vary across sociodemographic groups and their potential long-term health implications.
Asunto(s)
Aromatizantes , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , AncianoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cigarette and little cigar/cigarillo (LCC) dual use is popular among young people and poses a substantial health risk. What remains unclear is the abuse liability of LCCs vs. cigarettes, LCCs' substitutability for cigarettes, and the influence of flavors on the abuse liability and substitutability of LCCs. METHODS: Sixty-five young adults (18-34 years) who dual use completed hypothetical purchase tasks to measure consumption of usual brand cigarettes and LCCs in 24 hours at increasing prices (demand), and LCC consumption at increasing cigarette prices (substitution). Three demand indices were calculated from raw data: breakpoint (price after which consumption reaches 0), Omax (maximum daily expenditure), and Pmax (price at maximum expenditure). Two indices were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling: intensity (consumption when free) and price-sensitivity (rate of decline in consumption as price increases). Substitution, and associations of flavored use with demand and substitution, were estimated using linear mixed models. RESULTS: Results indicated similar abuse liability for LCCs and cigarettes. Intensity was greater for cigarettes, but price-sensitivity was similar. Flavored LCC use was associated with lower price-sensitivity and greater intensity than unflavored. LCCs were significant substitutes for cigarettes, but the effect was small. Flavored use was not associated with substitution. CONCLUSIONS: Among young adults who dual use, LCCs and cigarettes had similar abuse liability, and those who used flavored had higher demand for their LCCs. A flavored cigar ban, as well as targeted prevention and cessation services for those who smoke flavored LCCs, may be important for reducing dual use in young adults. IMPLICATIONS: Cigarette and LCC dual use remains high among young adults. Using hypothetical purchase tasks with young adults who dual use, LCCs had abuse liability similar to cigarettes, but were only modest substitutes for cigarettes. Participants who used flavored LCCs reported greater abuse liability than those who used unflavored, but not greater substitution for cigarettes. Prevention and cessation services are needed to target LCCs in young people, particularly those smoking flavored products. A flavored cigar ban may help to reduce their demand.
Asunto(s)
Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Productos de Tabaco/economía , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Comercio/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , AromatizantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Flavorings in cigars increase their appeal, mask the harsh taste of tobacco, and may hinder successful cigar smoking cessation; however, limited evidence has examined whether flavors are associated with short- or long-term cigar smoking cessation. AIMS AND METHODS: Using restricted data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 1-5, we examined whether flavored cigar use was associated with 30-day-plus and 1-year-plus cigar smoking cessation among US adults. Multivariable discrete-time survival models were fit to a nationally representative sample of US adult (18+) respondents who had a current, established cigar use, smoked five or more days in the past 30 days, and did not exclusively smoke traditional premium cigars at baseline. Models adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, income, cigar and cigarette smoking intensity, and blunt use. RESULTS: At baseline, 44.6% of respondents (n = 674) were 18-34 years old, 75.0% were male, 56.7% were non-Hispanic White, 78.9% had household incomes of <$50,000, and 56.2% smoked flavored cigars. In fully adjusted models, flavored cigar use was associated with a lower risk of 30-day-plus (HRâ =â 0.76, 95% CIâ =â 0.60, 0.97) but not 1-year-plus cigar smoking cessation (HRâ =â 0.81, 95%â =â 0.62, 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found that flavored cigar use was associated with a lower risk of short-term but not long-term cigar smoking cessation. More work is needed to understand the dynamics of cigar smoking transitions, including initiation, cessation, and relapse, particularly in larger cohorts and among those who exclusively use cigars or dual-use cigars and cigarettes. IMPLICATIONS: As local and some state jurisdictions continue to adopt partial or complete bans of flavored cigar products and the United States Food and Drug Administration considers a national ban of all characterizing flavors in cigars, there is a need for more longitudinal work examining the associations between flavorings in cigars and short and long-term cigar-smoking behaviors, including but not limited to initiation, cessation, intensity of use, and relapse, particularly in diverse cohorts.
Asunto(s)
Aromatizantes , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Estudios Longitudinales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to identify how young adult sexual gender minority (SGM) women who use cigarillos may respond to cigar flavor restrictions. AIMS AND METHODS: Young adults aged 21-28 years in the United States who currently use cigarillos were recruited between October 2020 and April 2021 to participate in an online survey. Due to high prevalence of cigarillo use among individuals who identify as sexual and/or gender minority (SGM) women, their (nâ =â 192) flavored tobacco-use behaviors and anticipated responses to cigarillo flavor restrictions were compared to cisgender heterosexual (CisHet) women (nâ =â 110). Logistic regression was used to model cigarillo cessation and product-switching behaviors (flavored and unflavored). RESULTS: SGM women were significantly less likely to report the use of flavor at the initiation of cigarillo use (61.7% vs. 86.1%) but were no different in current flavor use compared to CisHet women, with more than 80% of all women using any flavor. SGM women were 2.36 times as likely to say they would discontinue using cigarillos if flavors were unavailable. Among those who would continue using cigarillos, SGM women were 4.53 times as likely to endorse switching to an unflavored tobacco product but had the same likelihood of saying they would switch to flavored product compared to CisHet women. CONCLUSIONS: Flavor restriction policies may not reduce the initiation of cigarillos among SGM women and may elicit differential cigarillo use and tobacco product substitution by SGM identity. Flavor restriction policies should be coupled with targeted cessation resources to address potential remaining disparities. IMPLICATIONS: SGM US women have a unique cigarillo-use trajectory. These women are more likely to initiate cigarillos without flavor and then later integrate it into their behavior. National cigar flavor restrictions are expected to have a greater impact decreasing cigarillo initiation among CisHet women and decreasing current cigarillo use among SGM women. However, for those who would continue using unflavored cigarillos, SGM women may remain at risk for nicotine dependence due to increased product substitution. SGM women should be prioritized for cessation resources to reduce tobacco-use disparities leading up to and following the implementation of cigar flavor restrictions.
Asunto(s)
Aromatizantes , Minorías Sexuales y de Género , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Adulto Joven , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/estadística & datos numéricos , Minorías Sexuales y de Género/psicología , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We examined whether the proportion of cigar pack quantity usually purchased differed between 2014 and 2017 in the United States. METHODS: Data are from waves 1 and 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. The proportions of pack quantity purchases between waves for premium cigars, large cigars, cigarillos, and filtered cigars for 10-pack quantities (singles, 2-packs, 3-packs, 4-packs, 5-packs, 6-9-packs, 10-packs, 11--19-packs, 20-packs, ≥21 packs) were compared using Z-tests. We used multivariable linear regressions to examine factors associated with pack quantity. RESULTS: For premium cigars, most adults purchased singles, with 84.4% in 2014 and 88.7% in 2017. For large cigars, single purchases increased from 46.2% to 62.7% (pâ <â .00001). Two-packs also increased, 3.1% to 10.2% (pâ <â .00001), while 5-packs, 6-9 packs, 10-19-packs, and 20-packs decreased. For cigarillos, singles purchases increased from 51.9% to 57.5% (pâ =â .0002). Two-packs also increased, 8.8% to 19.6% (pâ <â .00001), while 3-packs, 4-packs, 5-packs, and 20-packs decreased. For filtered cigars, the most prevalent pack quantity shifted from 20-packs in 2014 (62.6%) to singles in 2017 (36.7%). Singles, 2-packs, 3-4-packs, and 5-packs increased while 11-19-packs, 20-packs, and ≥21 packs decreased. Days used were positively associated with pack quantity purchase for all cigar types in 2017, while the price was positively associated with premium cigar purchase. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2014 and 2017, the proportion of consumers who purchased singles remained at over 80% for premium cigars and increased for other cigars. Continued monitoring of use behaviors, including pack quantities by cigar type, is needed as the market and policy landscapes continue shifting. IMPLICATIONS: Single cigar purchases are prominent across cigar types. Five-packs and 20-packs were the second most common pack quantities across cigar types, with relatively low proportions for other pack quantities. These findings suggest adults consuming premium cigars consistently prefer singles, a pattern that was found across cigar types. However, when considering purchases made online, premium cigars are widely purchased in larger pack quantities. Age and race were associated with purchase for some cigar types at some years, days used were associated with the purchase quantity in 2017 for all cigar types, and price was positively associated across time periods for only premium cigar purchases. Thus, the factors associated with cigar pack quantity purchase remain unclear. As the cigar policy landscape shifts, continued monitoring of the purchase behaviors by cigar type will be important to better inform future cigar policies.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Humanos , Comportamiento del Consumidor , Modelos Lineales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Fumar Puros/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Young adults are at risk for cigar smoking, which is associated with cancers and pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. Little is known about young adults' beliefs about smoking cigarillos, little filtered cigars, and large cigars, and how these beliefs may vary across cigar types and by cigar susceptibility. AIMS AND METHODS: The larger study surveyed a U.S. sample of young adults (18-30 years old) who never used tobacco products (n = 948) through Qualtrics online panel services in August 2021-January 2022. We assessed participants' susceptibility to using different cigar types. Participants were randomly assigned to open-ended questions about one of the three cigar types to elicit behavioral, normative, and control beliefs. We conducted thematic analysis to code emergent themes within each belief and examined the frequency of reported themes at the intersection of cigar type and cigar susceptibility. RESULTS: Cigar susceptible participants reported positive behavioral beliefs (eg, anticipated relaxation, mood regulation, being cool), friends as supportive referents, and easy-to-smoke control beliefs (eg, high accessibility, low cost) more frequently than non-susceptible participants. Varied frequency by cigar type also emerged. For example, cigarillo and little filtered cigar features were mentioned more frequently as easy-to-smoke control beliefs, while low accessibility was reported more frequently as a hard-to-smoke control belief for large cigars. CONCLUSIONS: Findings identify salient beliefs about cigarillo, little filtered cigar, and large cigar smoking among young adult tobacco never-users. Future research should investigate the potential importance of these beliefs in cigar smoking susceptibility and initiation among young adults, and their potential utility in prevention research. IMPLICATIONS: This thematic analysis identified salient beliefs about cigarillos, little filtered cigars, and large cigars among a U.S. young adult sample, and differentiated emergent beliefs by cigar susceptibility status and by cigar type. Given the lack of cigar smoking prevention media campaigns, identifying these beliefs is the one of the first steps in developing effective cigar smoking prevention strategies. Future quantitative studies are needed to confirm the relationships between these beliefs and smoking initiation of each cigar type to further inform the types of beliefs to be targeted in strategic communication and help prevent cigar smoking initiation among susceptible young adults.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Adulto Joven , FumarRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Improved understanding of health conditions associated with premium cigar smoking can inform efforts to reduce cigar use. This paper extends findings commissioned for the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report on premium cigars. AIMS AND METHODS: We pooled 2010-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data to evaluate cross-sectional associations between premium cigar smoking and mental health and substance use conditions among U.S. adults. A series of logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and ethnicity, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption compared odds of each condition associated with past-month premium cigar smoking relative to past-month nonpremium cigar smoking, never tobacco use, and current established cigarette smoking. RESULTS: Premium cigar smoking was associated with lower adjusted odds of past month serious psychological distress, past year major depressive episode, and cannabis and illicit drug dependence relative to nonpremium cigar and cigarette smoking; however, higher odds of alcohol and cannabis dependence were observed relative to never tobacco use, and lower odds of alcohol dependence were observed relative to current cigarette smoking but not current nonpremium cigar smoking. CONCLUSIONS: We observed considerable variation in both magnitude and direction of associations between premium cigar smoking and mental health and substance use indicators depending on the condition and reference group to which premium cigar smoking was compared. IMPLICATIONS: Premium cigar smoking frequently cooccurs with cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, thus potential health correlates must be considered in appropriate context. We observed considerable variation in direction and magnitude of association depending on the health condition and reference population, as well as potential for reverse causality and residual confounding in this cross-sectional analysis. As the tobacco landscape continues to evolve, rigorous scientific studies that incorporate clear differentiation of cigar type, measures of cumulative use, and temporal data collection are necessary to fully evaluate the health effects of premium cigar smoking and effectively inform Food and Drug Administration regulation.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Productos de Tabaco , Humanos , Adulto , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Premium cigar use is infrequent compared with the use of other tobacco products, including other cigar types (eg, cigarillos), though current measurement methods for premium cigar use have limitations. Accordingly, prevalence estimates from existing surveillance studies likely underestimate the true prevalence of premium cigar use. AIMS AND METHODS: Using an online convenience sample of adults (ages 18-45 years) surveyed in February 2022, we examined premium or traditional cigar prevalence and characterized users based on four definitions of use: (1) past-year use, (2) past 30-day use, (3) use every day or some days, and (4) use every day, some days, or rarely, using a novel, one-item measure. We examined demographics, cigar use behaviors, and other tobacco product use for each definition and conducted sensitivity analyses using cigar brands. RESULTS: Prevalence estimates ranged from 1.8% using Definition 3 to 11.6% using Definition 1. Regardless of definition, premium or traditional cigar users were largely male, white, and aged 25-45 years. A large proportion of users based on Definition 3 were aged 25-34 years, had a regular premium cigar brand, smoked cigars on more than one day in the past month, used cannabis in the past month, and reported perceiving premium cigars as less harmful compared with cigarettes. DISCUSSION: Prevalence estimates of premium or traditional cigar use varied by more than fivefold based on the definition of use and user characteristics varied by definition. Existing national surveys are likely underestimating the prevalence and patterns of premium cigar use. IMPLICATIONS: Given that the negative health effects of premium cigars vary based on how the cigars are used (eg, frequency or duration), as well as co-use with other tobacco products and substances (eg, alcohol and cannabis), accurate measurement of these products is important for understanding patterns of use and their impact on public health.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Tabaquismo , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Cannabis , Prevalencia , Fumar/epidemiología , Tabaquismo/epidemiología , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Femenino , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few studies have addressed the use patterns and characteristics of the past 30 days of premium versus non-premium cigar smokers. AIMS AND METHODS: We pooled 10 years of data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; 2010-2019) to evaluate use patterns and demographic and tobacco use characteristics of premium and non-premium cigar smokers ages 12 years and older in the U.S. cigar-type was manually coded as premium or non-premium according to the brand used most often. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, 4.7% (95% CI = 4.6-4.8) of individuals aged 12 and older currently smoked cigars (past-30-day use). Smoking premium cigars (0.9% [95% CI = 0.8-0.9]) was less prevalent than smoking non-premium cigars (3.0% [95% CI = 2.9-3.1]). Although current non-premium cigar smoking prevalence steadily declined over the years, current premium cigar smoking prevalence remained stable. Premium cigar smokers were more likely to be older (≥25 years), male, non-Hispanic white, heterosexual, college educated, living in a large metro area, and to have income above 200% of the poverty threshold compared to non-premium users (p < .05). Additionally, past-30-day premium cigar smokers were less likely than non-premium users to initiate cigar smoking before the age of 18 years, smoke cigars frequently or daily, smoke cigarettes, or use marijuana (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, premium cigar smoking is less prevalent than non-premium cigar smoking, especially among populations such as youth, racial/ethnic and sexual minorities, and low socioeconomic individuals. Premium cigar smokers tend to smoke infrequently and initiate cigars later in life compared with non-premium smokers. Study results can inform recommendations for regulating premium cigars. IMPLICATIONS: This study found that between 2010 and 2019, there are meaningful differences in the use patterns and characteristics of past-30-day premium versus non-premium cigar smokers in the United States. Premium cigars comprise a small share of the market compared to other cigar types and are less likely to be used by youth and other tobacco control priority groups (eg, racial/ethnic minorities and individuals with low socioeconomic statuses) that bear a disproportionate burden of risk and harm from using tobacco products. Additionally, most premium cigar users smoke them only occasionally. However, it is important to continue to monitor premium cigar use, as these patterns could shift because of factors like changes in marketing practices, consumer awareness, and product prices. Tobacco policy changes may also alter the patterns and trends of premium cigar use over time. A greater, more comprehensive understanding of premium cigars' physical characteristics, patterns of use, user perceptions, tobacco industry marketing strategies, and health effects will together help to inform cigar-related regulations.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Fumadores , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Understanding the characteristics of premium cigar use patterns is essential for minimizing public health harms. Typically, premium cigars are handmade, larger, more expensive, and without the characterizing flavors that are present in other cigar types: Nonpremium traditional cigars, cigarillos, and filtered cigars. AIMS AND METHODS: Self-reported brand and price data were used from Wave 6 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to define and estimate premium versus nonpremium cigar use among U.S. adults, as well as to explore cigar smoking patterns, purchasing behavior, and reasons for use by cigar type. RESULTS: In 2021, 0.9% (95% CI = 0.7-1.0) of adults were premium cigar users, compared to 0.4% of nonpremium traditional cigar users (95% CI = 0.3-0.5), 1.1% of cigarillo users (95% CI = 1.0-1.2), and 0.6% filtered cigar users (95% CI = 0.5-0.7). Premium cigar users were overwhelmingly male (97.7%), and 35.8% were aged ≥55 years. The average premium cigar price/stick was $8.67, $5.50-7.00 more than other cigar types. Compared to other cigar types, significantly fewer premium cigar users had a regular brand with a flavor other than tobacco (~15% vs. 38%-53%). Though flavors remained the top reason for premium cigar use, they were less likely to endorse flavors as a reason for use than other cigar users (~40% vs. 68-74%). Premium cigar users had a lower prevalence (aRR: 0.37, 95% CI = 0.25-0.55) of dual use of cigars and cigarettes. CONCLUSIONS: Although <1% of U.S. adults use premium cigars, their use and purchasing characteristics continue to differ from other cigar types, highlighting the importance of capturing data specific to premium cigar use. IMPLICATIONS: This manuscript extends previous research from the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report, "Premium cigars: Patterns of use, marketing, and health effects" by utilizing the most recent PATH Study data (Wave 6) to examine patterns of cigar use, including purchasing behavior and reasons for use, by cigar type (eg, premium traditional cigars, nonpremium traditional cigars, cigarillos, and filtered cigars). The findings support continued research on patterns of premium cigar use, which differ from use patterns of other cigar types.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Autoinforme , Fumar/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about cigar use among women of reproductive age, especially potential differences relating to the use of premium versus non-premium cigars. AIMS AND METHODS: Using 2010-2019 data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, rates and trends in premium and non-premium cigar use were determined among women of reproductive age (18-49; n = 5651). Weighted sociodemographic characteristics, substance co-use, patterns of use, and health indicators were compared between women using premium versus non-premium cigars. RESULTS: Among reproductive-aged women who smoked cigars in the past 30 days, 4.9% reported use of premium cigar brands. The most commonly used premium brands were Romeo y Julieta, Cohiba, and Macanudos. Women who used premium versus non-premium cigars were less likely to identify as non-Hispanic black (16.5% vs. 35.5%), more likely to have household income >$50 000 (54.2% vs. 26.6%), and less likely to report past 30-day marijuana (28.7% vs. 55.7%) or blunt use (26.0% vs. 53.9%; ps < .001). Women who used premium cigars also reported later age of onset of cigar use (24.1 vs. 20.3 years; p < .001) and smoked fewer cigars in the last 30 days (9.8 vs. 2.3 days; p < .001). Trend analysis revealed that although rates of past 30-day premium cigar use remained consistent from 2010 (4.7%) to 2019 (4.9%), prevalence decreased from 6.6% in 2017 to 2.8% in 2018 before increasing to 4.9% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding premium and non-premium cigar use among reproductive-age women, an understudied vulnerable population, will provide critical data to the Food and Drug Administration to inform policy and regulatory decisions. IMPLICATIONS: The current study revealed prevalence of ~5% premium cigar use among women of reproductive age who smoke cigars, and evidence for consistency in women's rates of premium cigar use across time. Women who used premium versus non-premium cigars were more likely to identify as non-Hispanic white, older, and of higher socioeconomic status were in better health and less likely to co-use cigarettes and marijuana, but more likely to co-use alcohol. Consideration of reproductive age and pregnant women as uniquely vulnerable populations is warranted in the development of regulations regarding premium and non-premium cigars. Comprehensive regulation of cigars (both premium and non-premium) may offer the potential to positively impact women's health.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Cannabis , Prevalencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Salud de la Mujer , Fumar Puros/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Flavored cigar sales restrictions (FCSRs) may reduce cigar smoking and protect public health. This study examined the correlates of behavior change intents in response to a hypothetical FCSR. Data were from a nationally representative sample of adult flavored cigar smokers (ages ≥21; n = 343) collected through an online survey in 2021. Respondents selected their behavior change intents in response to a hypothetical FCSR, including (1) quitting cigars altogether; (2) smoking plain or non-flavored cigars; (3) smoking other flavored tobacco products; (4) smoking cannabis; and (5) other options. Weighted logistic regressions were used to examine the associations of socio-demographic backgrounds, tobacco use history, and tobacco dependence with behavioral change intents. In response to an FCSR, 15.1% of respondents would quit smoking cigars altogether, 41.6% would smoke plain cigars without flavors, 33.4% would substitute flavored cigars with other flavored tobacco products, and 29.2% would substitute flavored cigars with cannabis. Large cigar smokers and blunt smokers were less likely to quit cigars altogether than non-smokers of those products; females and racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to substitute flavored cigars with other flavored tobacco and cannabis products, respectively, than males and non-Hispanic White respondents. Results suggest that FCSRs may reduce cigar smoking among a portion of U.S. flavored cigar smokers while leaving more continuing to smoke plain cigars or transitioning to use other flavored tobacco products or cannabis. Implementing FCSRs should be accompanied by comprehensive flavored tobacco sales restrictions, cessation programs, and educational messages aimed at reducing the use of cigars and other substances.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Aromatizantes , Comercio , Uso de TabacoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cigar smoking has increased in recent decades as the cigar product landscape has diversified. This study assessed trends in US cigar sales during 2016-2020. AIMS AND METHODS: Unit sales and average unit price for cigars were assessed during January 3, 2016-June 13, 2020, overall and by product and flavor type, for the 48 contiguous US states and D.C. Assessed cigar types were large cigars, little cigars, and cigarillos; assessed flavor types were tobacco/unflavored, candy/sweets, fruit, menthol, alcohol, coffee, other flavors, and no flavor stated. A joinpoint regression model was used to assess the magnitude and significance of sales trends. RESULTS: During January 3, 2016-June 13, 2020, unit sales of cigarillos increased (average monthly percentage change [AMPC] = 0.7%, p < .001), while unit sales of large cigars (AMPC = -0.8%, p < .001) and little cigars decreased (AMPC = -0.2%, p < .001). The average price of cigarillos gradually decreased since mid-August 2017 (AMPC = -0.1%, p < .001), and the average price of little cigars decreased from mid-June 2016 to mid-June 2019 (AMPC = -0.3%, p < .001). In contrast, the average price of large cigars increased during the entire study period (AMPC = 0.6%, p < .001). Irrespective of cigar type, tobacco-flavored/unflavored products were the most commonly sold cigars during the assessed period; however, sales of other flavors varied by cigar type. CONCLUSIONS: Cigar sales and price vary by type over time in the United States, including sales of cigarillos (94.2% of unit sales) increasing as their prices have decreased in recent years. Public health strategies are warranted to address the full scope of cigar types being used in the United States. IMPLICATIONS: Surveillance of cigar sales data, including product characteristics, can provide a timely complement to self-reported survey data of cigar use. This study assessed trends in US cigar sales during 2016-2020, including by product and flavor type. The findings indicate that sales of cigarillos, which comprise most cigar sales in the United States during the assessed period, increased as their prices decreased. Sales of certain flavors, such as candy/sweet cigarillos and coffee large cigars, increased significantly. These findings reinforce the importance of evidence-based strategies, including increasing price and restricting flavors, to reduce the affordability and consumption of cigars in the United States.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Comercio , Aromatizantes , Humanos , Mentol , Uso de Tabaco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Little systematic evidence exists about the effectiveness of cigar warnings. This study examined the perceived message effectiveness (PME) of warning statements about different health consequences caused by cigars. PME is a validated self-report scale of how effectively a health message discourages smoking. AIMS AND METHODS: We conducted an online study from April to May 2020 with adults in the United States who used cigars in the past 30 days (n = 777). Participants were randomly assigned to view and rate PME (three items, range 1-5) for seven out of 37 text warning statements about different health consequences from cigar use. Linear mixed effects models evaluated the most effective warning characteristics (eg, type of health consequence), controlling for repeated measures and participant demographics. RESULTS: Analyses showed that health consequences about the cardiovascular system (B = 0.38), mouth (B = 0.40), other digestive (B = 0.45), respiratory system (B = 0.36), and early death (B = 0.36) were associated with higher PME scores than reproductive health consequences (all p values <.001). Similar results were found for these health consequences compared with addiction (all p values p < .001). We also observed that awareness of the health consequence was associated with higher PME scores (B = 0.19, p < .001) and length of the warning message (number of characters) was associated with lower PME scores (B = -0.007, p = .03). No differences were observed between cancer and noncancer health consequences (p = .27) or health consequences that used plain language versus medical jargon (p = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides new evidence about the perceived effectiveness of different cigar health warning statements and identifies features that may strengthen statements. IMPLICATIONS: Our study with cigar smokers from across the United States provides much-needed evidence concerning the perceived effectiveness of different cigar health warning statements and features that may strengthen such statements. Mandated cigar warnings in the United States could be strengthened by including health consequences that were perceived as more effective in our study (eg, early death), using health consequences that participants were aware of, and using short warning statements.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros , Productos de Tabaco , Adulto , Humanos , Etiquetado de Productos/métodos , Fumadores , Fumar , Productos de Tabaco/efectos adversos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim: The prevalence analysis of three ways of tobacco use among young adults: traditional (smoking of cigarillos or cigars) and alternative (hookah smoking and use of E-cigarettes) as well as the development of ways of tobacco smoking prevention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: Cross-section anonymous survey among young adults 18-44 years of age (n=410) has been conducted. The obtained results were compared with the data of the similar studies from different countries. The statistical methods (analysis of the mean and relative values), structural and logical analysis and systemic approach. RESULTS: Results: Among those who were interviewed, aged 18-44 years, there are 24.15±2.11 % of respondents - hookah smokers, 9.02±1.42 % persons prefer the traditional method of tobacco use (smoking of cigarillos or cigars), while 6.34±1.20 % ones use E-cigarettes. Such forms of smoking are more common among males. The smokers of cigarillos, cigars and hookahs have appreciated their high availability when buying - 9 (7;10) points out of 10 possible. The study has found that 11.54±1.58 % of smokers of E-cigarettes and 8.08±1.35 % of hookah smokers consider them safe types of smoking and harmless to their health. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The prevention methods of smoking prevalence among young people must be based on the tougher rules of tobacco market and latest devices for smoking at the legislative level.
Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Fumar , Productos de Tabaco , Adolescente , Adulto , Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Fumar Cigarrillos/epidemiología , Sistemas Electrónicos de Liberación de Nicotina/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Prevalencia , Fumar/epidemiología , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/estadística & datos numéricos , Productos de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Fumar Tabaco/epidemiología , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiología , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Tabaco para Pipas de Agua/estadística & datos numéricos , Vapeo/epidemiología , Fumar en Pipa de Agua/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The present study compared the properties of mainstream smoke generated from heat-not-burn (HNB) cigarettes and a combustion cigarette (hi-lite™ brand). Three types of cigarette heating devices were used to generate cigarette smoke at different heating temperatures [Ploom S™ (200 °C), glo™ (240 °C), and IQOS™ (300-350 °C)]. Mainstream smoke was generated using the following puffing regimen: volume, 55 mL; duration, 3 s; and interval, 30 s. The rank order of particulate phase (nicotine and tar) amounts trapped on a Cambridge filter was Ploom S < glo < IQOS < hi-lite. Heated cigarette-derived smoke extract (hCSE) from the devices except for Ploom S, and burned CSE (bCSE) decreased mitochondrial metabolic activity (glo < IQOS < hi-lite) in human vascular endothelial cells. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity was reduced by removing the particulate phase from the mainstream smoke. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity was reduced by nicotine- and tar-free CSE of IQOS and hi-lite (IQOS < hi-lite), but not Ploom S and glo. These inhibitory effects were diminished by removing the carbonyl compounds from the mainstream smoke. These results indicated that the cytotoxicity of hCSE was lower than that of bCSE in vascular endothelial cells.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros/efectos adversos , Células Endoteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Nicotina/toxicidad , Humo/efectos adversos , Humo/análisis , Productos de Tabaco/toxicidad , Células Cultivadas , Células Endoteliales/metabolismo , Calor , Humanos , Mitocondrias/metabolismo , Nicotina/aislamiento & purificación , Óxido Nítrico Sintasa de Tipo III/metabolismo , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cigars are a popular tobacco product of choice for youth and young adults. Despite growing interest in cigar research, there are gaps in the available literature limiting an ability to set evidence-based policies. Too small research samples, the heterogeneity of types of cigars when asking a single question about use, makes analyzing data difficult. Given the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) authority granted in 2016 to regulate cigars, and its popularity, data to better understand use and preference for cigars will help FDA set appropriate regulatory policies. METHODS: We harmonized cigar survey data previously collected by five independent tobacco regulatory science survey research projects. Data supplying participants included three Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science, one Center for Tobacco Products grantee, and data from Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study's public use dataset. RESULTS: Analyzing 92 data variables from across five studies, and applying a rigorous data harmonization protocol, we report findings on 24 key cigar use variables. The step by step protocol for harmonizing is presented. Selected findings showing strict reproducibility across all five studies reveal youth 17-19 years at highest risk for cigar initiation; relative reproducibility shows males more likely to try cigars than females but with significant differences in magnitude across studies; and areas of inconsistent reproducibility are revealed when evaluating brand preferences. CONCLUSION: Harmonizing data from multiple sources fosters a broader view of the robustness and generalizability of survey data than that from a single source. These observations raise awareness to look for the highest degree of reproducibility among and across data sources to inform policy. IMPLICATIONS: Harmonizing data from discrete datasets provides insights into cigar initiation and use and is presented showing opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Comparing observational data from PATH and four independent research studies provides a best-practices approach and example of data synthesis for the tobacco research community. The dataset of five studies offers a look at the degree of confidence in analyzing harmonized survey results. Variable conclusions raise the need to strive for the highest degree of reproducibility, to best understand the behaviors of cigar users, and allow for the future development of the most effective interventions to alter tobacco use patterns.
Asunto(s)
Fumar Puros/epidemiología , Fumar Puros/prevención & control , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Productos de Tabaco/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Fumar Puros/psicología , Femenino , Regulación Gubernamental , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The recent 2016 deeming of cigars by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has led to increased interest in cigar science, including ways to accurately measure the harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) found within mainstream cigar smoke. At present, there are standardized methods for evaluating HPHCs in mainstream cigarette smoke but none specific to cigar analysis except for nicotine and carbon monoxide. This study sought to analyze carbonyl delivery in marketed cigars and cigarillos and compare them against levels found in cigarettes. To accomplish this the standard cigarette method, CORESTA recommended method 74 (CRM-74), was optimized for cigar smoking including an evaluation of the trapping efficiency and the stability of the carbonyl-hydrazone adducts due to the increased smoke time required for cigar collection. On a per product basis, carbonyl delivery from cigars smoked under CRM-64 conditions was found to yield similar levels of formaldehyde and greater levels of acetaldehyde, acrolein and crotonaldehyde than measured in mainstream cigarette smoke collected under conditions prescribed under ISO standard 3308. Furthermore, on a per product basis, cigarettes smoked under the ISO 20778 intense smoking regime delivered higher levels of formaldehyde, acrolein and crotonaldehyde as compared to cigars smoked under the CORESTA regime, while acetaldehyde was found to be higher in mainstream cigar smoke. Given the recent deeming, this work expands upon previously reported work, limited in scope by either number of products or analytes reported, through the analysis of carbonyl delivery found in the mainstream smoke for 12 brands of cigars and cigarillos.