TRPS1 is a promising marker for all subtypes of breast cancer.

AIMS: Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome-1 (TRPS1) has been proposed as a novel breast marker with equally high expression in breast cancer (BC) subtypes, making it a useful diagnostic tool. Here, its expression was evaluated alongside other commonly used markers [GATA3, GCDFP15, mammaglobin (MGB) and SOX10] in a large cohort of BCs (n = 1852) and their corresponding nodal metastases. Its usefulness as a diagnostic tool and its correlation with clinicopathological features were assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: TRPS1 was expressed at 75.8% overall in the BC cohort, with at least 58% expression among BC subtypes. It was less sensitive than GATA3 for luminal and HER2-overexpressing (HER2-OE) cancers (luminal A: 82 versus 97%; luminal B: 80 versus 95%; HER2-OE: 62 versus 76%), but it was the most sensitive for TNBC (60 versus ≤ 41%). It showed a stable expression in nodal metastases (primary tumour 76 versus nodal metastasis 78%), unlike a reduced nodal expression for GATA3 (86 versus 77%). TRPS1 outperformed GATA3 in detecting non-luminal cancers when paired with other breast markers. TRPS1 and GCDFP15 was the most sensitive combination in TNBC detection, with a 76% detection rate. For TRPS1-negative and GCDFP15-negative TNBCs, SOX10 was more sensitive than GATA3 (29 versus 24%). CONCLUSIONS: TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for all breast cancer subtypes, outperforming GATA3 in non-luminal cancers and displaying the highest sensitivity for TNBC detection when combined with GCDFP15. It is a valuable addition to the breast marker panel for accurate identification of BC.

Utility of MUC4 in the diagnosis of secretory carcinoma of salivary glands.

Salivary gland tumors are diverse in morphology and both benign and malignant tumors may pose diagnostic challenges especially in small biopsies. Secretory carcinoma (SC) is histologically characterized by microcysts, follicles, solid growth pattern and occasional papillary structures, and absence of zymogen granules. SC is molecularly defined by the presence of novel gene fusion ETV6::NTRK3. Among the positive stains (S100 and mammaglobin), MUC4 is now another promising marker for the diagnosis of SC, that would enable the pathologists to exclude other morphologically close simulators. Aim of this study was to report clinicopathological features and assess utility of MUC4 in the diagnosis of SC. MUC4 was performed on 22 cases of SC. Glass slides were reviewed to record morphological patterns and staining of S100, mammaglobin, DOG1 and MUC4. Age ranged from 9 to 63 years with mean age of 34.41 ± 16.28 years. The male: female ratio was 72.7 %:27.3 %. The majority occurred in major salivary glands. A combination of patterns was seen; microfollicles were the most prevalent (90 %) followed by papillary-cystic and macrofollicles. MUC4 was positive in 19/21 (90 %) cases with almost equal number of 2+ and 3+ staining. MUC4 was negative in all cases of acinic cell carcinoma, polymorphous adenocarcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, salivary duct carcinoma, myopepithelioma and myoeithelial carcinoma, cystadenoma and cribriform adenocarcinoma and all except 3 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma tested. Overall sensitivity of MUC4 was 95.4 %, specificity 90 %, p-value being <0.01, positive predictive value 87.5 % and negative predictive value 96.4 %. A characteristic cytoplasmic granular pattern was observed in 76.1 % tumors. S100 and mammaglobin were positive in all the performed cases. DOG1 was positive in 6/11 (28.5 %) tumors. In conclusion, MUC4 is a useful addition to a diagnostic immunohistochemical panel for SC, and to distinguish it from close potential mimickers such as acinic cell carcinoma, especially in practice settings where molecular testing is unavailable.

Matrix Gla protein (MGP), GATA3, and TRPS1: a novel diagnostic panel to determine breast origin.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast carcinoma is commonly considered during differential diagnosis when metastatic disease is detected in females. In addition to the tumor morphology and documented clinical history, sensitive and specific immunohistochemical (IHC) markers such as GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, and GATA3 are helpful for determining breast origin. However, these markers are reported to show lower sensitivity in certain subtypes, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using bioinformatics analyses, we identified a potential diagnostic panel to determine breast origin: matrix Gla protein (MGP), transcriptional repressor GATA binding 1 (TRPS1), and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3). We compared MGP, TRPS1, and GATA3 expression in different subtypes of breast carcinoma of (n = 1201) using IHC. As a newly identified marker, MGP expression was also evaluated in solid tumors (n = 2384) and normal tissues (n = 1351) from different organs. RESULTS: MGP and TRPS1 had comparable positive expression in HER2-positive (91.2% vs. 92.0%, p = 0.79) and TNBC subtypes (87.3% vs. 91.2%, p = 0.18). GATA3 expression was lower than MGP (p < 0.001) or TRPS1 (p < 0.001), especially in HER2-positive (77.0%, p < 0.001) and TNBC (43.3%, p < 0.001) subtypes. TRPS1 had the highest positivity rate (97.9%) in metaplastic TNBCs, followed by MGP (88.6%), while only 47.1% of metaplastic TNBCs were positive for GATA3. When using MGP, GATA3, and TRPS1 as a novel IHC panel, 93.0% of breast carcinomas were positive for at least two markers, and only 9 cases were negative for all three markers. MGP was detected in 36 cases (3.0%) that were negative for both GATA3 and TRPS1. MGP showed mild-to-moderate positive expression in normal hepatocytes, renal tubules, as well as 31.1% (99/318) of hepatocellular carcinomas. Rare cases (0.6-5%) had focal MGP expression in renal, ovarian, lung, urothelial, and cholangiocarcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that MGP is a newly identified sensitive IHC marker to support breast origin. MGP, TRPS1, and GATA3 could be applied as a reliable diagnostic panel to determine breast origin in clinical practice.

Immunohistochemical Markers for Distinguishing Metastatic Breast Carcinoma from Other Common Malignancies: Update and Revisit.

Due to the high prevalence of breast cancer in the female, a metastasis from primary breast cancer is usually considered in the differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in the female patient, even for those without a history of breast cancer, as some breast cancers are first diagnosed as metastases. Immunohistochemical analysis for breast cancer markers is the most common way to determine breast cancer origin besides clinical history and histology. In this review, we (1) summarize the commonly used and the newly identified breast cancer markers, including GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, GATA3, SOX10, and TRPS1; (2) point out the strengths and weaknesses of using these markers for breast cancers with luminal/epithelial or basal/myoepithelial differentiation; and (3) recommend diagnostic panels to differentiate breast carcinoma from carcinoma with similar morphology of other origins.

MUC4 is a valuable marker for distinguishing secretory carcinoma of the salivary glands from its mimics.

AIMS: Secretory carcinoma (SC) (synonym: mammary analogue secretory carcinoma) is a low-grade salivary gland tumour that occurs in both major and minor salivary glands. SC is known for its wide morphological, architectural and immunohistochemical spectrum, which overlaps with those of several salivary gland neoplasms, including acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) and intercalated duct-type intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in major salivary glands, and polymorphous adenocarcinoma (PAC) in minor salivary glands. These tumours share with SC some morphological features and SOX10 immunoreactivity; also, with the exception of AciCC, they all coexpress S100 and mammaglobin. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared MUC4 and mammaglobin expression in 125 salivary gland carcinomas (54 genetically confirmed SCs, 20 AciCCs, 21 PACs, and 30 IDCs) to evaluate the potential of these two markers to differentiate these entities. Moderate to strong diffuse MUC4 positivity was detected in 49 SCs (90.7%), as compared with none of the IDCs and PACs. In contrast, mammaglobin was frequently expressed in SCs (30 of 36 cases; 83.3%), IDCs (24/28; 85.7%), and PACs (7/19; 36.8%). Two of three high-grade SCs lost MUC4 expression in the high-grade tumour component. No significant correlation was found between MUC4 expression and the fusion variant in SC (ETV6-NTRK versus non-ETV6-NTRK). CONCLUSION: The results of our study identify MUC4 as a sensitive (90.7%) and specific (100%) marker for SC, with high positive (100%) and negative (93.4%) predictive values. Thus, MUC4 may be used as a surrogate for SC in limited biopsy material and in cases with equivocal morphology.

Combined SOX10 GATA3 is most sensitive in detecting primary and metastatic breast cancers: a comparative study of breast markers in multiple tumors.

PURPOSE: For invasive breast cancer (IBC), high SOX10 expression was reported particularly in TNBC. This raised the possibility that SOX10 may complement other breast markers for determining cancers of breast origin. METHODS: Here, we compared the expression of SOX10 with other breast markers (GATA3, mammaglobin and GCDFP15) and their combined expression in a large cohort of IBC together with nodal metastases. We have also evaluated the expression of GATA3 and SOX10 in a wide spectrum of non-breast carcinomas to assess their value as breast specific markers. RESULTS: Compared with other markers, SOX10 showed lower overall sensitivity (6.5%), but higher sensitivity in TNBC (31.4%) than other breast markers including GATA3 (29.7% for TNBC). Its expression demonstrated the highest concordance between the paired IBC and nodal metastases (96.4%, κ = 0.663) among all the breast markers. More importantly, SOX10 identified many GATA3-negative TNBC, thus the SOX10/GATA3 combination was the most sensitive marker combination for IBC (86.6%). For non-breast carcinoma, a high SOX10/GATA3 expression rate was found in melanoma (77.9%, predominately expressed SOX10), urothelial carcinoma (82.0%, predominately expressed GATA3) and salivary gland tumors (69.4%). Other carcinomas, including cancers from lungs, showed very low expression for the marker combination. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggested that SOX10/GATA3 combination can be used for differentiating metastases of breast and multiple non-breast origins. However, the differentiation with melanoma and urothelial tumors required more careful histologic examination, thorough clinical information and additional site-specific IHC markers. For salivary gland tumors, the overlapping tumor types with IBC renders the differentiation difficult.

Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10) as a sensitive marker for triple-negative breast cancer.

AIMS: Confirmation of a breast origin for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is sometimes problematic. The traditional breast markers GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), mammaglobin (MGB) and gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) have shown limitations in identifying TNBC. Here, we aimed to examine the diagnostic potential of the newly proposed TNBC marker, Sry-related high-mobility-group/HMG box 10 (SOX10). METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed and compared SOX10 expression with GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 expression in a test cohort of 1838 invasive breast cancers (IBCs) by using tissue microarrays. The findings from the test cohort were further examined with a validation cohort of 42 TNBCs in whole sections. The overall expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 6.9%, 83.1%, 47.0%, and 34.8%, respectively. Among the TNBCs within this cohort, the expression rates of SOX10, GATA3, MGB and GCDFP15 were 31.3%, 34.5%, 27.9%, and 25.2%, respectively. SOX10 was strongly associated with TNBC (P < 0.001), whereas all other traditional markers were associated with non-TNBC (P < 0.001 for all). In addition, SOX10 was more correlated to basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) (P = 0.001) than five-marker-negative subtype among the TNBCs. A high expression rate of SOX10 (81%) was confirmed in the validation cohort. Additionally, SOX10 expression was inversely correlated with GATA3 and GCDFP15 expression, so they may complement each other in TNBC detection. The SOX10-GATA3 combination yielded a sensitivity of 60.3% for TNBC detection in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: SOX10 is a reliable marker for identifying TNBC, and complements GATA3. The SOX10-GATA3 combination may be used as a sensitive TNBC marker.

Immunohistological expression of oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, mammaglobin, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and GATA-binding protein 3 in non-small-cell lung cancer.

AIMS: Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer are common entities. Staining for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), mammaglobin (MAMG) and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) is frequently performed to confirm a mammary origin in the appropriate diagnostic setting. However, comprehensive data on the immunohistological expression of these markers in NSCLC are limited. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse a large cohort of NSCLCs and correlate the staining results with clinicopathological variables. METHODS AND RESULTS: A tissue microarray was stained for ER, PgR, MAMG, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and GATA3, and included 636 adenocarcinomas (ADCs), 536 squamous cell carcinomas (SqCCs), 65 large-cell-carcinomas, 34 pleomorphic carcinomas, and 20 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. HER2 status was determined for immunohistochemically positive cases with chromogenic in-situ hybridisation. Markers with a proportion of ≥5% positive cases in ADC and SqCC were considered for survival analysis. Among ADCs, 62 (10%), 17 (3%), one (<1%), seven (1%), and 49 (8%) cases were positive for ER, PgR, MAMG, HER2, and GATA3, respectively. Among SqCCs, 10 (2%), 14 (3%), two (<1%) and 109 (20%) cases were positive for ER, PgR, HER2, and GATA3, but none of the samples showed positivity for MAMG. ER positivity was associated with ADC, female sex, smaller tumour size, and lower clinical stage. None of the markers had an impact on survival. CONCLUSION: We report on ER, PgR, MAMG, HER2 and GATA3 expression in a large cohort of NSCLCs. Interpretation of these markers in the differential diagnostic setting should be based on a multimarker panel.

GATA-3 is superior to GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin to identify primary and metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Despite numerous studies on the utility of GATA-3 as breast cancer marker, its comparison with other breast markers, its concordance between primary and metastatic tumors and its expression in primary cancers from sites with frequent breast metastases remains unclear. METHODS: To address these questions, totally 993 invasive breast cancers (IBC), 254 paired nodal metastases, 23 distant metastases, and 208 lung carcinomas were included. GATA-3 expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and compared to other breast markers [gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin (MGB)]. RESULTS: GATA-3 was expressed in 82.5% of IBC, predominantly in luminal (93.9%), and lower in non-luminal cancers [59.6% of HER2 overexpressing (HER2-OE) and 38.1% of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes]. GATA-3 identified more IBC than GCDFP-15 (23.9%) and MGB (46.6%). However, MGB showed a comparable sensitivity for non-luminal cancers to GATA-3. Combining MGB and GATA-3 improved sensitivity for both HER2-OE (80.8%) and TNBC cases (55.4%). GATA-3 showed a high sensitivity for nodal metastases and distant metastases, with good concordance with primary tumors. GATA-3 was expressed in 1.0% of lung carcinomas, with sensitivity and specificity of 82.5 and 99.0% in differentiating IBC and lung carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: GATA-3 expression was the highest in luminal breast carcinomas, and showed higher sensitivity than GCDFP-15 and MGB. However, in the poorly differentiated IBC, its utility was still limited. One should be aware of the possible GATA-3 expression in lung carcinomas.

The role of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: prognostic and predictive value.

The aim of the current study was to assess the prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their related markers at different points of chemotherapy regimens in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The impact of CTCs on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were also assessed. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from 66 female patients with MBC at different time intervals for evaluation of CTCs by flow cytometry (FC). cytokeratin 19 (CK19), mammaglobin, prolactin inducible peptide (PIP), aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) were also assessed by qRT-PCR. Analysis of different CTC levels (at 4, 5, and 6 cells/7 ml), showed statistically significant values at 4 cells/7 ml blood. The presence of baseline CTCs < 4 cells/7 ml, associated significantly with higher PFS (P value = 0.03). Patients showing a decrease in the CTCs level after treatment had significantly prolonged median PFS and OS rates compared to those whose CTCs level increased (P = 0.007 and P = 0.014; respectively). Mammaglobin, CK19, PIP, ALDH1 and hCG expression did not affect PFS or OS. However, patients with CTCs ≥ 4 at diagnosis had higher rates of progression compared to those with CTCs < 4 (1.9 times, P = 0.07), and who metastasized before 4 years showed a worse decrease outcomes (they were 2.4 time more progressed than those who metastasized after 4 years; P = 0.029). CTCs could be an independent prognostic and predictive biomarker for MBC patients' outcomes. Although none of the assessed genes (mammaglobin, CK19, PIP, ALDH1 and hCG) showed correlation with PFS or OS rates, further studies on a larger number of patients are required to validate the current results.

Detection of gene expression in sentinel lymph node of primary breast cancer patients.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) micrometstasis detection improves outcome for breast cancer follow up procedure. The aim of the present study was to identify gene profiles that accurately predicted the outcome of breast cancer patients. Fifty tumor sample from breast cancer patients were analyzed for the expression of 3 genes using quantitative-PCR. Also clinical verification for recurrence to distant organs was performed. Three gene signature were confirmed based on tumor's stage, grade, ER status, using conditional logistic regression. Based on this findings, the negative reported lymph nodes for metastasis, had micro metastasis in significant values. There was a significant difference between normal and cancer samples in 3 gene expression marker and also there was meaningful relationship between three gene expression with tumor's grade, stage according to progression of tumor. A novel gene expression signature predictive of micro metastatic patients was evaluated. In this assessment, relationship between this gene with tumor's features   that finding clear role for these genes with tumor's outcome, needs to be established.

GATA3 as a putative marker of breast cancer metastasis-A retrospective immunohistochemical study.

Diagnostic verification of breast cancer metastasis with histopathology and imaging analysis is essential to determine tumor staging. The aim of this study was to validate the utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic marker for breast cancer metastases and metastases of unknown primary origin. Retrospective immunohistochemical analysis of GATA3 expression in 164 breast cancer metastases diagnosed between 2004 and 2014 showed a striking difference between mammaglobin and GATA3 expression (51.2% vs 94% positivity). These findings highlight GATA3 as a more reliable and sensitive diagnostic marker for breast cancer metastases and possibly metastatic tumors of unknown origin than mammaglobin.

Mammaglobin and DOG-1 expression in polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma: an appraisal of its origin and morphology.

BACKGROUND: Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (PLGA) remains a diagnostic challenge for most pathologists due to its large spectrum of histological patterns. In this study, the expression of two new markers recently described for salivary gland tumors was studied in PLGA. METHODS: The morphology of 33 cases of PLGA was carefully evaluated using hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections and confirmed by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 7, vimentin, and S-100. Periodic acid-Schiff with diastase digestion was also used. The expression of mammaglobin and DOG-1 was carried out using the EnVision System. Mammaglobin was assessed according to the percentage of positively stained tumor cells, while DOG-1 was evaluated according to its presence and site. For MCM-2 and Ki-67, markers of proliferation, the labeling index of cell nuclei positivity was evaluated using total cell number. The ETV6-NTRK3 fusion was examined by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. RESULTS: The histological patterns of the tumor were classified as lobular or non-lobular. For the non-lobular pattern, tubular, cribriform, glomeruliform, trabecular, and papillary patterns were observed. Mammaglobin was present in all PLGA cases, and its expression was stronger (P = 0.01) in the lobular than in the non-lobular pattern. The expression of DOG-1 was present in the apical portion and cytoplasm of the cells. Proliferation markers were low for all cases independent of histological pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma has been confirmed to originate from the intercalated duct and to feature high expression of mammaglobin in its lobular pattern resembling that of mammary secretory analogue carcinoma, except for the ETV6 gene rearrangement.

Utility of different immunostains for diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinomas in both surgical and cytological specimens.

OBJECTIVE: A panel of immunostains is usually performed to confirm a metastatic carcinoma origin. GATA3 is a transcription factor and has been proven to be a useful marker for breast carcinoma. Other immunostains including mammaglobin (MGB), gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP-15), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) are also used in diagnosing metastatic breast cancer. In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of these immunostains in the work up of metastatic breast carcinoma in both surgical and cytological specimens. STUDY DESIGN: This study cohort was composed of 242 metastatic breast carcinomas (142 surgical and 100 cytological specimens) during a study period from October 2013 to December 2015. Immunostain results of GATA3, CK7, MGB, GCDFP-15, ER and PR and their correlations were examined. RESULTS: In surgical specimens, GATA3 and CK7 were highly expressed (88% and 87%), but MGB and GCDFP-15 showed much lower positivity rates (43% and 29%). In cytological specimens, GATA3, CK7 and MGB showed similar positivity rates to those in surgical specimens; but GCDFP-15, ER and PR showed significantly lower positivity rates than those in surgical specimens. All ER-positive cases were positive for GATA3 in both surgical and cytological specimens; however, GATA3 positivity showed a significantly stronger correlation with ER positivity in surgical specimens than in cytological specimens. CONCLUSIONS: GATA3 and CK7 performed better than other immunostains to detect metastatic breast carcinoma in both surgical and cytological specimens. GATA3 expression was positively correlated with ER expression, and the correlation was stronger in surgical specimens than in cytological specimens.

GATA3 expression in clinically useful groups of breast carcinoma: a comparison with GCDFP15 and mammaglobin for identifying paired primary and metastatic tumors.

GATA3 has been recognized as the novel marker for identifying primary and metastatic breast carcinomas, consistently showing that GATA3 was significantly more sensitive than traditional markers gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 (GCDFP15) and mammaglobin (MGB). However, clinically useful groups of breast carcinomas status were not identified, which were determining appropriate treatment strategy, affecting the prognosis. In this study, we undertook a comparative study of the marker GATA3 and GCDFP15 and MGB in clinically useful groups of paired primary and metastatic breast cancer. We retrieved 64 cases of matched primary and metastatic breast cancer from the surgical pathology archive at our institution. According to the emerging 2015 St. Gallen Consensus, the clinically useful groups were divided into ER and/or PR (+), HER2 (-), abbreviated as A; ER and/or PR (+), HER2 (+), abbreviated as B; ER and PR (-), HER2 (+), abbreviated as C; ER, PR and HER2 (-), abbreviated as D; each group contained 16 cases (n=16). Tissue microarrays were created, with three 1-mm punch specimens from each case. The tissue microarrays were cut at 4-µm thickness and stained with monoclonal antibodies to GATA3, GCDFP15, and MGB. Staining intensity (0-3+) and extent (0%-100%) were scored with an H-score calculated (range, 0-300). Sensitivities by varying H-score cutoffs (any; ≥50; ≥150) for a positive result in the clinically useful groups of matched primary or metastatic breast cancer among GATA3, GCDFP15, and MGB. GATA3 was significantly more sensitive than GCDFP15 and MGB A and B groups (P<.05) rather than C and D groups (P>.05). However, GATA3 in conjunction with GCDFP15 and MGB detection could improve the sensitivity of C group (P<.05) rather than D group (P>.05). Significantly, good coincidence was observed between primary and metastatic tumor GATA3 expression (κ value = 0.826 >0.75) as compared with the coincidence of GCDFP15 (κ value =0.492 <0.75) and MGB (κ value =0.593 <0.75) (both P<.05). In conclusion, GATA3 expression did not show the same sensitivity for the clinically useful groups of breast cancer. GATA3 expression is positively correlated with ER-positive, PR-positive, and HER2-positive carcinomas. In addition, the matched primary and metastatic tumor expression of GATA3 shows good coincidence. We propose the careful selection of GATA3 for identifying hormone receptor negativity of breast cancer, especially in the case of triple-negative breast cancer.

Mammaglobin 1 promotes breast cancer malignancy and confers sensitivity to anticancer drugs.

Mammaglobin 1 (MGB1), a member of the secretoglobin family, is expressed in mammary epithelial tissues and is overexpressed in most mammary carcinomas. Despite the extensive research correlating MGB1 expression profiles to breast cancer pathogenesis and disease outcome, the biological significance of MGB1 in cancer processes is still unclear. We have thus set out to conduct a functional evaluation of the molecular and cellular roles of MGB1 in breast cancer processes leading to disease progression. Using a series of breast cancer cell models with conditional MGB1 expression, we demonstrate that MGB1 promotes cancer cell malignant features. More specifically, loss of MGB1 expression resulted in a decrease of cell proliferation, soft agar spheroid formation, migration, and invasion capacities of breast cancer cells. Concomitantly, we also observed that MGB1 expression activates signaling pathways mediated by MAPK members (p38, JNK, and ERK), the focal adhesion kinase (FAK), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and NFκB. Moreover, MGB1 regulates epithelial to mesenchymal (EMT) features and modulates Snail, Twist and ZEB1 expression levels. Interestingly, we also observed that expression of MGB1 confers breast cancer cell sensitivity to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. Together, our results support a role for MGB1 in tumor malignancy in exchange for chemosensitivity. These findings provide one of the first descriptive overview of the molecular and cellular roles of MGB1 in breast cancer processes and may offer new insight to the development of therapeutic and prognostic strategies in breast cancer patients. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Markers of metastatic carcinoma of breast origin.

This review summarizes the three major breast-associated markers that can be of assistance in evaluating metastatic carcinomas for which a breast primary diagnosis is entertained. These markers include gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15), mammaglobin, and GATA3. The first two are cytoplasmic markers that show comparable sensitivities for breast cancer, although relatively few of the published studies have employed the same antibodies against the target molecule, making direct comparisons challenging. GATA3 is a nuclear transcription factor that shows superior sensitivity to GCDFP-15 and mammaglobin. However, the specificity of GATA3 can pose challenges, inasmuch as carcinomas of the bladder and other sites can show significant levels of positivity. Determination of the optimal panel of antibodies employed in a given clinical setting will thus depend on the non-breast tumours included in the differential diagnosis.

Design of Polyepitope DNA Vaccine against Breast Carcinoma Cells and Analysis of Its Expression in Dendritic Cells.

Polyepitope DNA vaccine inducing T-cell-mediated immune response against cancer-specific antigens is a promising tool for selective elimination of tumor cells. Breast cancer-specific polyepitope DNA vaccine was designed using TEpredict and PolyCTLDesigner software on the basis of immunogenic peptides of HER2 and Mammaglobin-1 (Mam) tumor antigens. LPS-free preparations of plasmid DNA encoding polyepitope T-cell antigen and full-length copies of HER2 and Mam antigens were obtained. TaqMan-PCR systems for evaluation of the expression of immunogens in cells were created. The protocol of vaccine DNA delivery into dendritic cells was optimized. Expression of the target immunogens in dendritic cells derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear fraction after transfection with plasmid DNA preparations is demonstrated.

Human mammaglobin: A specific marker for breast cancer prognosis.

PURPOSE: In this study, we examined the expression of human mammaglobin (hMAM) mRNA and the protein levels in patients with breast cancer and their relationship with prognostic clinicopathological parameters. METHODS: hMAM mRNA expression in leucocytes from peripheral blood samples from patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer (IC), carcinoma in situ (CIS), or benign breast diseases was analyzed using RT-PCR. The hMAM protein levels and expression patterns in tissue from 3 patient groups were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining, and several non-breast neoplasms were selected as negative controls, undergoing the same examination. RESULTS: The expression of hMAM mRNA was significantly higher in patients with IC or CIS compared to those with benign tumors (both<0.01). Immunohistochemical staining revealed similar results, where patients with IC or CIS had higher levels of hMAM protein (p<0.01 and p<0.01, respectively), while none of the negative controls expressed hMAM. Further analyses showed a strong correlation between hMAM protein/mRNA expression and clinicopathological factors, such as histological grade, clinical stage, and lymph node status, in patients with IC. CONCLUSION: The hMAM mRNA and protein expression profiles validate the potential of hMAM as a specific marker for breast cancer diagnosis and target treatment delivery.

GATA-binding protein 3 enhances the utility of gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin A in triple-negative breast cancer by immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: We have demonstrated previously that gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) and mammaglobin A (MAM) are of limited utility in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA-3) is an emerging breast-associated immunohistochemical (IHC) marker with limited data in TNBC. Here, we examined GATA-3 expression in TNBC in comparison with GCDFP-15 and MAM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied GATA-3, GCDFP-15 and MAM IHC expression in 62 primary and 68 metastatic TNBCs. In primary TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 25 cases (40%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. In metastatic TNBCs, GATA-3 staining was observed in 30 cases (44%), including 16 cases that were negative for GCDFP-15 and MAM. The expression frequency of any of the markers was 56% in primary and 62% in metastatic TNBCs. However, when focal staining was excluded, the expression frequency of any marker dropped to 31% and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSION: GATA-3 is expressed at a higher frequency by IHC in TNBC compared to GCDFP-15 and MAM, although the tissue specificity of the latter markers may be superior. When evaluating a triple-negative tumour, including GATA-3 in a panel of markers may increase the diagnostic accuracy for tissue origin in the appropriate clinical setting.