RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An adequate workforce is needed to guarantee optimal kidney care. We used the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) to provide an assessment of the global kidney care workforce. METHODS: We conducted a multinational cross-sectional survey to evaluate the global capacity of kidney care and assessed data on the number of adult and paediatric nephrologists, the number of trainees in nephrology and shortages of various cadres of the workforce for kidney care. Data are presented according to the ISN region and World Bank income categories. RESULTS: Overall, stakeholders from 167 countries responded to the survey. The median global prevalence of nephrologists was 11.75 per million population (pmp) (interquartile range [IQR] 1.78-24.76). Four regions had median nephrologist prevalences below the global median: Africa (1.12 pmp), South Asia (1.81 pmp), Oceania and Southeast Asia (3.18 pmp) and newly independent states and Russia (9.78 pmp). The overall prevalence of paediatric nephrologists was 0.69 pmp (IQR 0.03-1.78), while overall nephrology trainee prevalence was 1.15 pmp (IQR 0.18-3.81), with significant variations across both regions and World Bank income groups. More than half of the countries reported shortages of transplant surgeons (65%), nephrologists (64%), vascular access coordinators (59%), dialysis nurses (58%) and interventional radiologists (54%), with severe shortages reported in low- and lower-middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant limitations in the available kidney care workforce in large parts of the world. To ensure the delivery of optimal kidney care worldwide, it is essential to develop national and international strategies and training capacity to address workforce shortages.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Nefrólogos , Nefrología , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrólogos/provisión & distribución , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pass rate on the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) nephrology certifying exam has declined and is among the lowest of all internal medicine (IM) subspecialties. In recent years, there have also been fewer applicants for the nephrology fellowship match. METHODS: This retrospective observational study assessed how changes between 2010 and 2019 in characteristics of 4094 graduates of US ACGME-accredited nephrology fellowship programs taking the ABIM nephrology certifying exam for the first time, and how characteristics of their fellowship programs were associated with exam performance. The primary outcome measure was performance on the nephrology certifying exam. Fellowship program pass rates over the decade were also studied. RESULTS: Lower IM certifying exam score, older age, female sex, international medical graduate (IMG) status, and having trained at a smaller nephrology fellowship program were associated with poorer nephrology certifying exam performance. The mean IM certifying exam percentile score among those who subsequently took the nephrology certifying exam decreased from 56.7 (SD, 27.9) to 46.1 (SD, 28.7) from 2010 to 2019. When examining individuals with comparable IM certifying exam performance, IMGs performed less well than United States medical graduates (USMGs) on the nephrology certifying exam. In 2019, only 57% of nephrology fellowship programs had aggregate 3-year certifying exam pass rates ≥80% among their graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in IM certifying exam performance, certain trainee demographics, and poorer performance among those from smaller fellowship programs explain much of the decline in nephrology certifying exam performance. IM certifying exam performance was the dominant determinant.
Asunto(s)
Certificación/tendencias , Evaluación Educacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/tendencias , Medicina Interna/educación , Nefrología/educación , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Certificación/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Médicos Graduados Extranjeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Interna/tendencias , Masculino , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/tendencias , Médicos Osteopáticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the delivery of nephrology care on outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: This was a single centre, retrospective observational study. Between January 2007 and December 2014, 675 CEAs performed on 613 patients were stratified by pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values (CKD [eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2] and non-CKD [eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73m2] groups) for retrospective analysis. The study outcomes included the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as fatal or non-fatal stroke, myocardial infarction, or all cause mortality, during the peri-operative period and within four years after CEA. RESULTS: The CKD group consisted of 112 CEAs (16.6%), and the non-CKD group consisted of 563 CEAs (83.4%). The MACE incidence was higher among patients with CKD compared with non-CKD patients during the peri-operative period (4.5% vs. 1.8%; p = .086) and within four years after CEA (17.9% vs. 11.5%; p = .066), with a non-statistically significant trend. In a subgroup analysis of patients with CKD under nephrology care (63/112, 56.3%; with better controlled risk factors and tighter medical surveillance by a nephrologist), patients with CKD without nephrology care (49/112, 43.8%), and non-CKD patients, the risk of both peri-operative (4.1% vs. 0.4%; p = .037) and four year post-operative (20.4% vs. 7.3%; p = .004) all cause mortality was statistically significantly higher among patients with CKD without nephrology care compared with non-CKD patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences between patients with CKD who received nephrology care and non-CKD patients in peri-operative and four year post-operative MACE occurrence, both in terms of the composite MACE outcome and the individual MACE components. CONCLUSION: Despite the higher risk of peri-operative and four year MACE after CEA among patients with CKD, and the statistically significantly higher peri-operative and four year post-operative all cause mortality rates among patients with CKD without nephrology care, patients with CKD under nephrology care had similar outcomes to non-CKD patients.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/fisiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
A funnel plot is a graphical method to evaluate health-care quality by comparing hospital performances on certain outcomes. So far, in nephrology, this method has been applied to clinical outcomes like mortality and complications. However, patient-reported outcomes (PROs; eg, health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) are becoming increasingly important and should be incorporated into this quality assessment. Using funnel plots has several advantages, including clearly visualized precision, detection of volume-effects, discouragement of ranking hospitals and easy interpretation of results. However, without sufficient knowledge of underlying methods, it is easy to stumble into pitfalls, such as overinterpretation of standardized scores, incorrect direct comparisons of hospitals and assuming a hospital to be in-control (ie, to perform as expected) based on underpowered comparisons. Furthermore, application of funnel plots to PROs is accompanied by additional challenges related to the multidimensional nature of PROs and difficulties with measuring PROs. Before using funnel plots for PROs, high and consistent response rates, adequate case mix correction and high-quality PRO measures are required. In this article, we aim to provide insight into the use and interpretation of funnel plots by presenting an overview of the basic principles, pitfalls and considerations when applied to PROs, using examples from Dutch routine dialysis care.
Asunto(s)
Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Nefrología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Proyectos de Investigación , Benchmarking , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Globally, renal healthcare practitioners provide intensive and protracted support to a highly complex multi-morbid patient population however knowledge about the impact of COVID-19 on these practitioners is extremely limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the experiences of COVID-19 with renal healthcare practitioners during the first global lockdown between June 2020 and September 2020. METHODS: A multi-methods approach was carried out including a quantitative survey and qualitative interviews. This was a multinational study of renal healthcare practitioners from 29 countries. Quantitative: A self-designed survey on COVID-19 experiences and standardised questionnaires (General Health Questionnaire-12; Maslach Burnout Inventory). Descriptive statistics were generated for numerical data. Qualitative: Online semi-structured interviews were conducted. Data was subjected to thematic analysis. Renal healthcare practitioners (n = 251) completed an online survey. Thirteen renal healthcare practitioners took part in semi-structured interviews (12 nurses and 1 dietician). RESULTS: The majority of participants surveyed were female (86.9 %; n = 218), nurses (86.9 %; n = 218) with an average 21.5 (SD = 11.1) years' experience since professional qualification, and 16.3 years (SD = 9.3) working in renal healthcare. Survey responses indicated a level of preparedness, training and satisfactory personal protective equipment during the pandemic however approximately 40.3 % experienced fear about attending work, and 49.8 % experienced mental health distress. The highest prevalence of burnout was emotional exhaustion (35.9 %). Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis highlighting the holistic complexities in managing renal healthcare, a neglected specialist workforce, and the need for appropriate support at work during a pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Results have highlighted the psychological impact, in terms of emotional exhaustion and mental health distress in our sample of renal healthcare practitioners. As the pandemic has continued, it is important to consider the long-term impact on an already stretched workforce including the risk of developing mental health disorders. Future research and interventions are required to understand and improve the provision of psychological support for specialist medical and nursing personnel.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Global , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Adulto , Anciano , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , COVID-19/terapia , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermería en Nefrología/economía , Enfermería en Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Equipo de Protección Personal , Distrés Psicológico , Investigación Cualitativa , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Outcomes after acute kidney injury (AKI) are well described, but not for those already under nephrology clinic care. This is where discussions about kidney failure risk are commonplace. We evaluated whether the established kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) should account for previous AKI episodes when used in this setting. METHODS: This observational cohort study included 7491 people referred for nephrology clinic care in British Columbia in 2003-09 followed to 2016. Predictors were previous Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes-based AKI, age, sex, proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and renal diagnosis. Outcomes were 5-year kidney failure and death. We developed cause-specific Cox models (AKI versus no AKI) for kidney failure and death, stratified by eGFR (≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2). We also compared prediction models comparing the 5-year KFRE with two refitted models, one with and one without AKI as a predictor. RESULTS: AKI was associated with increased kidney failure (33.1% versus 26.3%) and death (23.8% versus 16.8%) (P < 0.001). In Cox models, AKI was independently associated with increased kidney failure in those with an eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 {hazard ratio [HR] 1.35 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.70]}, no increase in those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ([HR 1.05 95% CI 0.91-1.21)] and increased mortality in both subgroups [respective HRs 1.89 (95% CI 1.56-2.30) and 1.43 (1.16-1.75)]. Incorporating AKI into a refitted kidney failure prediction model did not improve predictions on comparison of receiver operating characteristics (P = 0.16) or decision curve analysis. The original KFRE calibrated poorly in this setting, underpredicting risk. CONCLUSIONS: AKI carries a poorer long-term prognosis among those already under nephrology care. AKI may not alter kidney failure risk predictions, but the use of prediction models without appreciating the full impact of AKI, including increased mortality, would be simplistic. People with kidney diseases have risks beyond simply kidney failure. This complexity and variability of outcomes of individuals is important.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Proteinuria/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/normas , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and acute kidney disease (AKD) are a continuum on a disease spectrum and frequently progress to chronic kidney disease. Benefits of nephrologist subspecialty care during the AKD period after AKI are uncertain. METHODS: Patients with AKI requiring dialysis who subsequently became dialysis independent and survived for at least 90 days, defined as the AKD period, were identified from the Taiwanese population's health insurance database. Cox proportional hazard models using death as the competing risk before and after propensity-score matching were applied to evaluate various endpoints. RESULTS: Among a total of 20 260 patients with AKI requiring dialysis who became dialysis independent, only 7550 (37.3%) patients were followed up with by a nephrologist (F/Unephrol group) during the AKD period. During a mean 4.04 ± 3.56 years of follow-up, the patients in the F/Unephrol group were more often administered statin, antihypertensives, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), diuretics, antiplatelet agents, and antidiabetic agents. The patients in the F/Unephrol group had a lower mortality rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, P < .001) and were less likely to have major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (subdistribution HR [sHR] = 0.85, P < .001), congestive heart failure (CHF) (sHR = 0.81, P < .001), and severe sepsis (sHR = 0.88, P = .008) according to the Cox proportional model after adjusting for mortality as a competing risk. During the AKD period, an increase in the frequency of nephrology visits was associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based cohort, even after weaning off acute dialysis, only a minority of patients visited a nephrologist during the AKD period. We showed that nephrology follow-up is associated with a decrease in MACE, CHF exacerbations, and sepsis, as well as lower mortality; thus it may improve outcomes in patients with AKD.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Lesión Renal Aguda/complicaciones , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Taiwán/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rates of pediatric hypertension have increased, but adherence to the current diagnostic criteria for hypertension (HTN) in pediatrics is not well known. We investigated the timeline and predictors of time to referral for those referred to nephrology for elevated blood pressure (EBP). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients, aged 3-18 years, referred to a nephrology clinic for EBP over a 3-year period. Patients were excluded if they were referred previously, were referred for other conditions, or did not have ≥ 1 prior visit with EBP. Analyses were performed to determine whether sex, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and obesity predicted number of prior visits with EBP and time to referral. RESULTS: There were 120 patients (64% male; 53% obese) included and 82 (68%) had ≥ 3 prior visits with EBP ≥ 95%. Medians were as follows: 15.08 years of age at referral; 5 visits with EBP and 3.45 years from first EBP ≥ 90%; 4 visits with EBP and 1.42 years from third EBP ≥ 95%. No variables significantly predicted number of prior visits with EBP or time to referral from the first EBP. Starting with the third EBP ≥ 95%, only obesity significantly predicted number of prior visits and time to referral: Obese patients had more visits (p = 0.01), and took longer to be referred (p = 0.03) than healthy patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with EBP were generally not referred to nephrology promptly, which was especially true for obese patients. Further research is needed to identify interventions to improve time to referral for EBP.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Obesidad/epidemiología , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Masculino , Pediatría/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 1998, a survey of the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology (ESPN) revealed substantial disparities in pediatric renal care among European countries. Therefore, ESPN aimed at harmonizing renal care in all European countries in the following 20 years. In 2017, we conducted a survey to evaluate the current status of renal health policies for children in Europe. METHODS: A 33-question web-based survey was designed and sent to presidents or representatives of national societies of pediatric nephrology in 44 European countries. RESULTS: Data was reported from 42 (95.5%) countries. The number of pediatric nephrologists per million child population increased from 1998 to 2017 in 70% of countries. Pediatric dialysis facilities for acute kidney injury and end-stage kidney disease were available in 95% of countries. The availability of pediatric kidney transplantation increased from 55 to 93% of countries. Considerable variation was found in the current availability of allied health professionals, including psychosocial and nutritional support, high-tech diagnostic methods, and treatment with expensive drugs for children with kidney diseases between different European countries. CONCLUSIONS: The 20-year follow-up analysis of pediatric renal care services in European countries revealed that pediatric nephrology has become a well-established subspecialty in pediatrics and nephrology in 2017. The ESPN will continue its efforts to further improve pediatric renal care for European children by harmonizing remaining disparities of renal care services.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Técnicos Medios en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Estudios de Seguimiento , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Nefrólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/organización & administración , Pediatría/organización & administración , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Practice patterns and bleeding complications of percutaneous native kidney biopsy (PNKB) have not recently been investigated and the Japanese Society of Nephrology performed a nationwide questionnaire survey in 2018. METHODS: The survey consisted of nine sections about PNKB: (1) general indications; (2) indications for high-risk patients; (3) informed consent; (4) pre-biopsy evaluation; (5) procedures; (6) sedation; (7) post-biopsy hemostasis, bed rest, and examinations; (8) bleeding complications; and (9) specimen processing. A supplementary survey examined bleeding requiring transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). RESULTS: Overall, 220 directors of facilities (nephrology facility [NF], 168; pediatric nephrology facility [PF], 52) completed the survey. Indications, procedures, and monitoring protocols varied across facilities. Median lengths of hospital stay were 5 days in NFs and 6 days in PFs. Gauge 14, 16, 18 needles were used in 5%, 56%, 33% in NFs and 0%, 63%, 64% in PFs. Mean limits of needle passes were 5 in NFs and 4 in PFs. The bed rest period was 16-24 h in 60% of NFs and 65% of PFs. Based on 17,342 PNKBs, incidence rates of macroscopic hematuria, erythrocyte transfusion, and TAE were 3.1% (NF, 2.8%; PF, 6.2%), 0.7% (NF, 0.8%; PF, 0%), and 0.2% (NF, 0.2%; PF, 0.06%), respectively. Forty-six percent of facilities processed specimens all for light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy, and 21% processed for light microscopy only. Timing of bleeding requiring TAE varied among PNKB cases. CONCLUSION: Wide variations in practice patterns of PNKB existed among facilities, while PNKBs were performed as safely as previously reported.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Riñón/patología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/instrumentación , Biopsia/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hematuria/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Consentimiento Informado/estadística & datos numéricos , Japón , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Microscopía Electrónica/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Agujas/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Organizacional , Selección de Paciente , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation remains the optimal therapy for patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD), though a small fraction of patients on dialysis are on organ waitlists. An important barrier to both preemptive kidney transplantation and successful waitlisting is timely referral to a kidney transplant center. We implemented a quality improvement strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals in a single center academic outpatient nephrology clinic. METHODS: Over a 3 month period (July 1-September 30, 2016), we assessed the baseline kidney transplantation referral rate at our outpatient nephrology clinic for patients 18-75 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 20 mL/min/1.73m2 (2 values over 90 days apart). Charts were manually reviewed by two reviewers to look for kidney transplant referrals and documentation of discussions about kidney transplantation. We then performed a root cause analysis to explore potential barriers to kidney transplantation. Our intervention began on July 1, 2017 and included the implementation of a column in the electronic medical record (EMR) which displayed the patient's last eGFR as part of the clinic schedule. In addition, physicians were given a document listing their patients to be seen that day with an eGFR of < 20 mL/min/1.73m2. Annual education sessions were also held to discuss the importance of timely kidney transplant referral. RESULTS: At baseline, 54 unique patients with eGFR ≤20 ml/min/1.73 m2 were identified who were seen in the Clinic between July 1, 2016 and September 30, 2016. 29.6% (16) eligible patients were referred for kidney transplantation evaluation. 69.5% (37) of these patients were not referred for kidney transplant evaluation. 46.3% (25) did not have documentation regarding kidney transplant in the EMR. nephrologist's most recent note. Following the intervention, 66 unique patients met criteria for eligibility for kidney transplant evaluation. Kidney transplant referrals increased to 60.6% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot implementation study of a strategy to improve outpatient kidney transplant referrals showed that a free, simple, scalable intervention can significantly improve kidney transplant referrals in the outpatient setting. This intervention targeted the nephrologist's role in the transplant referral, and facilitated the process of patient recognition and performing the referral itself without significantly interrupting the workflow. Next steps include further investigation to study the impact of early referral to kidney transplant centers on preemptive and living donor kidney transplantation as well as successful waitlisting.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Nefrología/normas , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/normas , Rol del Médico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Centros Médicos Académicos , Anciano , Documentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Riñón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dermatological conditions are commonly seen in the emergency department and inpatient wards. The ability to access dermatology on-call services improves the accuracy of diagnosis and management of common and sometimes life-threatening conditions. Limitations of dermatologist availability led to the suspension of the dermatology on-call service for 3 months in Ottawa, Canada. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess the impact of this call suspension on patient care and the need for a dermatology on-call service at our hospital, as perceived by nondermatologist physicians at our center. METHODS: A survey was sent to all departments at The Ottawa Hospital, addressed to staff physicians and residents. Participation was entirely voluntary. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey responses. RESULTS: A total of 105 physicians completed the survey including staff physicians (85%) and resident trainees (15%). The most represented specialties were emergency medicine (N = 21), general internal medicine (N = 19), nephrology (N = 17), neurology (N = 13), and plastic surgery (N = 13). Over half of the respondents felt that the lack of dermatology on-call service impacted the care of their patients by a moderate or great extent. Over half reported performing dermatology-related clinical work during the call suspension and two-thirds of these individuals reported feeling uncomfortable or very uncomfortable doing so. Most (94%) participants felt that an on-call dermatology service was useful and 57% deemed it essential. CONCLUSION: Our survey results demonstrate a significant impact of the suspension of a dermatology on-call service, as perceived by nondermatologist physicians. Hospitals need to recognize the importance of on-call dermatology consultations and provide support for divisions to enable this service to continue.
Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/organización & administración , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dermatología/organización & administración , Medicina de Emergencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Hospitalaria , Hospitales , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Neurología/estadística & datos numéricos , Ontario , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Autoeficacia , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Cirugía Plástica/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Failure of a previously transplanted kidney is a common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and represents 5% of incident dialysis patients in the United States. Patients with native kidney failure ESRD (Nat-ESRD) who receive predialysis care from a nephrologist have better outcomes in the first 12 months on dialysis than those who don't. Because many patients with a failed kidney transplant ESRD (Tx-ESRD) receive care from nephrologists, they would also be expected to have good dialysis outcomes. We sought to compare the quality metrics of Tx-ESRD patients and Nat-ESRD patients during the first 12 months of hemodialysis. METHODS: We used data from the United States Renal Data System to identify hemodialysis patients who began treatment between May 2012 and December 2013 and who received nephrology care prior to starting hemodialysis. Quality metrics by quarter for the first 12 months of treatment were dichotomized according to practice guidelines to determine the percentage of patients in each quarter who met quality of care goals. RESULTS: Compared to Nat-ESRD (n = 96,063) patients, Tx-ESRD (n = 5,528) patients had 10-19% lower rates of at goal hemoglobin levels, 6-12% lower rates of at goal serum phosphorus, and 3-11% lower rates of at goal albumin levels. Compared to Nat-ESRD patients, -Tx-ESRD patients had a 6% higher rate of fistula use in the first quarter but a 3-7% lower rate in subsequent quarters. CONCLUSIONS: Tx-ESRD patients have worse quality metrics related to anemia, phosphorus, albumin, and vascular access compared to Nat-ESRD patients. Nephrology care for patients with Tx-ESRD should be improved to address these quality metrics gaps.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Fósforo/metabolismo , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Missing data is an important and common source of bias in clinical research. Readers should be alert to and consider the impact of missing data when reading studies. Beyond preventing missing data in the first place, through good study design and conduct, there are different strategies available to handle data containing missing observations. Complete case analysis is often biased unless data are missing completely at random. Better methods of handling missing data include multiple imputation and models using likelihood-based estimation. With advancing computing power and modern statistical software, these methods are within the reach of clinician-researchers under guidance of a biostatistician. As clinicians reading papers, we need to continue to update our understanding of statistical methods, so that we understand the limitations of these techniques and can critically interpret literature.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Nefrología/normas , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Sesgo , Niño , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Nefrólogos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas InformáticosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few good-quality clinical trials on adults with nephrotic syndrome exist. Thus, there are discrepancies between real-world practice and clinical practice guidelines. We conducted a questionnaire-based survey to investigate potential discrepancies and the factors associated with variations in clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered electronically to all board-certified nephrologists in Japan. To examine clinical practice variations in relation to physician characteristics, we estimated the ratio of the mean duration of steroid therapy using a generalized linear model, and the odds ratio of higher level ordinal variables using an ordered logistic regression model. RESULTS: Responses of the 116 participants showed some variation for the majority of questions. Most participants (94.8%) indicated that screening for malignant tumors was "Conducted for almost all patients". The duration of steroid therapy was found to be longer among physicians seeing ≥ 30 patients with nephrotic syndrome per month, both for minimal-change disease (ratio of mean 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.66) and membranous nephropathy (ratio of mean 1.71; 95% CI 1.09-2.69). CONCLUSIONS: We identified practice patterns for nephrotic syndrome and discrepancies between clinical practice guidelines and actual practice. Defining the standard therapy for nephrotic syndrome may be necessary to generate high-quality evidence and develop clinical guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome Nefrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Glomerulonefritis Membranosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Japón , Nefrología/normas , Nefrosis Lipoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The burden of kidney diseases is reported to be higher in lower- and middle-income countries as compared to developed countries, and countries in sub-Saharan Africa are reported to be most affected. Health systems in most sub-Sahara African countries have limited capacity in the form of trained and skilled health care providers, diagnostic support, equipment and policies to provide nephrology services. Several initiatives have been implemented to support establishment of these services. METHODS: This is a situation analysis to examine the nephrology services in Tanzania. It was conducted by interviewing key personnel in institutions providing nephrology services aiming at describing available services and international collaborators supporting nephrology services. RESULTS: Tanzania is a low-income country in Sub-Saharan Africa with a population of more than 55 million that has seen remarkable improvement in the provision of nephrology services and these include increase in the number of nephrologists to 14 in 2018 from one in 2006, increase in number of dialysis units from one unit (0.03 unit per million) before 2007 to 28 units (0.5 units per million) in 2018 and improved diagnostic services with introduction of nephropathology services. Government of Tanzania has been providing kidney transplantation services by funding referral of donor and recipients abroad and has now introduced local transplantation services in two hospitals. There have been strong international collaborators who have supported nephrology services and establishment of nephrology training in Tanzania. CONCLUSION: Tanzania has seen remarkable achievement in provision of nephrology services and provides an interesting model to be used in supporting nephrology services in low income countries.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Países en Desarrollo/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Biopsia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Riñón/patología , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñones Artificiales/provisión & distribución , Nefrólogos/provisión & distribución , Nefrología/educación , Diálisis Peritoneal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , TanzaníaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incident rates of ESRD are much higher among black and Hispanic patients than white patients. Access to nephrology care before progression to ESRD is associated with better clinical outcomes among patients with CKD. However, it is unknown whether black or Hispanic patients with CKD experience lower pre-ESRD nephrology consultation rates compared with their white counterparts, or whether such a disparity contributes to worse outcomes among minorities. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with CKD who received care through the Veterans Health Administration from 2003 to 2015, focusing on individuals with incident CKD stage 4 who had an initial eGFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 followed by two consecutive eGFRs<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. We repeated analyses among individuals with incident CKD stage 3. Outcomes included nephrology provider referral, nephrology provider visit, progression to CKD stage 5, and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 56,767 veterans with CKD stage 4 and 640,704 with CKD stage 3. In both cohorts, rates of nephrology referral and visits were significantly higher among black and Hispanic veterans than among non-Hispanic white veterans. Despite this, both black and Hispanic patients experienced faster progression to CKD stage 5 compared with white patients. Black patients with CKD stage 4 experienced slightly lower mortality than white patients, whereas black patients with CKD stage 3 had a small increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Black or Hispanic veterans with CKD are more likely than white patients to see a nephrologist, yet are also more likely to suffer disease progression. Biologic and environmental factors may play a bigger role than nephrology consultation in driving racial disparities in CKD progression.
Asunto(s)
Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Nefrología , Racismo , Derivación y Consulta , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Veteranos , Población BlancaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Late presentation (LP) of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to nephrologist is a serious problem worldwide with persistent high prevalence despite known benefits of early nephrology care. OBJECTIVE: Determine the prevalence and factors associated with LP of CKD patients to nephrologists in Cameroon. METHODS: A cross-sectional study from October 2015 to May 2016 at the nephrology units of the Douala General and Laquintinie hospitals, including all consenting incident CKD patients. Data collected were: socio-demographic, search of CKD diagnostic criteria during prior follow up, therapeutic itinerary, clinical and biological parameters at presentation, knowledge on CKD and attitude towards dialysis. LP was defined as eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. It was physician-related whenever no CKD screening was done in the presence of risk factor or no referral to nephrologists at early stages; patient-related whenever patients did not have recourse to hospital care while symptomatic or disrespected a referral decision. p value <.05. RESULTS: We included 130 patients, mean age 53.10 ± 14.66 years, 60.77% males, 58.70% were referred by internal medicine physicians and 10% had recourse to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). At presentation, 70.80% were symptomatic, 53% had CKD stage five, 86.12% were poorly graded on knowledge and 49% had a negative attitude towards dialysis. The prevalence of LP was 73.90%, 50% was physician-related, 44.79% patient-related and 5.21% both. Being accompanied (p = .038), a low level of education (p = .025) and recourse to CAM (p = .008) were associated with LP. CONCLUSION: LP is high in Cameroon, attributed to physician's practical attitudes and patient's socio-cultural behaviors and economic conditions.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Camerún/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/patología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys (PRB) has been an integral part of the practice of nephrology. However, over the past 30 years, PRB has transitioned from a procedure performed only by nephrologists to interventional radiologists (IRs). We surveyed practicing nephrologists completing training in our program to determine the clinical practice patterns of PRB. METHODS: The 78 fellows completing the nephrology program at Rush University Medical Center from June 1984 through June 2017 were successfully contacted and surveyed regarding their opinion on adequacy of their training and whether they performed PRB in practice and if not or no longer, why. To evaluate for differences in the performance of PRB over time, a comparison of 4 periods of fellowship completion (i.e., 1984-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-2010, 2011-2017) was performed. RESULTS: All 78 nephrologists felt they had been adequately trained to perform PRB. PRB was performed by 45 (58%) nephrologists post-fellowship, but a significant decline was observed over the 4 periods of time from 1984 to 2017 (100 vs. 86 vs. 52 vs. 20%, p < 0.0001). The primary reason that 33 nephrologists did not perform PRB was that it was too time consuming and IR was available to perform PRB. Of the 71 nephrologists still in practice only 12 (17%) continue to perform PRB. A greater proportion of nephrologists completing training from 1984-1990 continue to perform PRB relative to those trained after 1990. The universal reason that nephrologists were no longer performing PRB was again an issue of time and the fact that IRs were available to perform PRB. CONCLUSION: We find that there has been a significant transition over time in the performance of PRB by a nephrologist to IR. The major reason for this is the time burden associated with PRB and the availability of IRs.
Asunto(s)
Riñón/patología , Nefrólogos/tendencias , Nefrología/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Radiólogos/tendencias , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia/tendencias , Competencia Clínica , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/tendencias , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Nefrólogos/educación , Nefrólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Nefrología/educación , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To describe the factors affecting the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) among children, information from RRT registries is required. We aimed to give an overview of existing pediatric RRT registries worldwide, identify regions with a need to commence or increase data collection on pediatric RRT, and provide a rationale for developing a global RRT registry. METHODS: A survey assessing pediatric RRT registry status was sent to International Pediatric Nephrology Associateion (IPNA) members in 127 countries in January 2016. The survey was complemented by a systematic literature search for active pediatric RRT registries. RESULTS: Complete survey responses were retrieved from 94 countries (representing 86.2% of the world childhood population), with 84 (81.2%) having the means to provide RRT to children, given that there are no other limitations such as financial, social, or religious restraints. Fifty-one (35.3%) countries had national registries for both dialysis and transplantation, nine (30.0%) either had a dialysis or a transplant registry, six participated in international registries only (2.7%), and in 18 (13.2%), children on RRT were not followed in any registry. The search identified 92 pediatric RRT registries, primarily national registries located in Europe, North America, and Asia. CONCLUSIONS: Although pediatric RRT can be provided in 84 countries representing 81.2% of the world's childhood population, national pediatric RRT registries are unavailable in many countries. To improve knowledge about the incidence and outcomes of pediatric RRT around the globe, an international population-based pediatric RRT registry has recently been initiated.