Cerebrospinal fluid HIV-1 RNA, intrathecal immunoactivation, and drug concentrations after treatment with a combination of saquinavir, nelfinavir, and two nucleoside analogues: the M61022 study.

BACKGROUND: The way various antiretroviral drugs and drug combinations affect HIV-1 infection in the central nervous system is still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) steady-state concentrations of saquinavir and nelfinavir in relation to plasma concentrations, and to study their effect in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) on CSF viral loads, intrathecal immunoactivation, and blood-brain barrier integrity. METHODS: Paired CSF and plasma samples from 8 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1 infected patients starting combination therapy with saquinavir, nelfinavir, and two nucleoside analogues were collected prior to treatment, and again after approximately 12 and 48 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional plasma samples were taken at weeks 2, 4, 8, 24, and 36. The concentrations of protease inhibitors were analysed, as were levels of HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ T-cell count, beta2-microglobulin, neopterin, albumin ratio, IgG index, and monocytic cell count. RESULTS: None of the patients in the study presented with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL in CSF or plasma prior to treatment, compared to 5/7 at the end of the study. Signs of cell-mediated intrathecal immunoactivation, measured by neopterin and beta2-microglobulin, decreased significantly in both CSF and serum, although only 1/7 reached normal CSF neopterin levels after 48 weeks of treatment. There was no significant reduction of albumin ratio, IgG index or CSF monocytic cell count. Saquinavir median (range) concentrations were < 2.5 (< 2.5-96.0) nM unbound in plasma, and < 2.5 (< 2.5-9.0) nM total in CSF. Nelfinavir median (range) concentrations were 10.0 (< 2.0-31.0) nM unbound in plasma, and < 2.0 (< 2.0-23.0) nM total in CSF. Saquinavir and nelfinavir were detectable in 7/15 and 9/15 CSF samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: Saquinavir and nelfinavir, in combination with two NRTIs, decrease the CSF viral load and, to a lesser extent, intrathecal immunoactivation. We found reasonably high CSF concentrations of nelfinavir, but suboptimal concentrations of saquinavir.

Evidence of a source of HIV type 1 within the central nervous system by ultraintensive sampling of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma.

Defining the source of HIV-1 RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) will facilitate studies of treatment efficacy in the brain. Four antiretroviral drug-naive adults underwent two 48-hr ultraintensive CSF sampling procedures, once at baseline and again beginning on day 4 after initiating three-drug therapy with stavudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir. At baseline, constant CSF HIV-1 RNA concentrations were maintained by daily entry of at least 10(4) to 10(6) HIV-1 RNA copies into CSF. Change from baseline to day 5 ranged from -0.38 to -1.18 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in CSF, and from -0.80 to -1.33 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in plasma, with no correlation between CSF and plasma changes. There was no evidence of genotypic or phenotypic viral resistance in either CSF or plasma. With regard to pharmacokinetics, mean CSF-to-plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) ratios were 38.9% for stavudine and 15.3% for lamivudine. Nelfinavir and its active M8 metabolite could not be accurately quantified in CSF, although plasma M8 peak level and AUC(0-8hr) correlated with CSF HIV-1 RNA decline. This study supports the utility of ultraintensive CSF sampling for studying HIV-1 pathogenesis and therapy in the CNS, and provides strong evidence that HIV-1 RNA in CSF arises, at least in part, from a source other than plasma.

Differences in the detection of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors in non-blood compartments: clinical correlations.

PURPOSE: To study the presence of three HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), semen, and lymph nodes and to assess the correlations with residual viral replication in these compartments. METHOD: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of sanctuary samples from 41 HIV-infected patients on stable highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens containing indinavir, nelfinavir, or lopinavir combined with ritonavir (lopinavir/r) and a longitudinal analysis of PI levels and HIV-1 RNA in plasma and CSF of 6 additional patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy (3 cases each). Plasma, CSF, semen, and a lymph node (LN) biopsy were taken on the same day. Samples were assayed for PI concentrations, HIV-1 RNA levels, and, when detectable, sequencing of the reverse transcriptase and protease genes on seminal viral RNA. RESULTS: In the cross-sectional analysis, the CSF/plasma ratio was 0.14 for indinavir. Nelfinavir and lopinavir/r were consistently undetectable in CSF. The semen/plasma ratio was 1.9 for indinavir, 0.07 for nelfinavir, and 0.07 for lopinavir. The LN/plasma ratio was 2.07 for indinavir, 0.58 for nelfinavir, 0.21 for lopinavir, and 0.64 for ritonavir. Plasma HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 28 patients and was detectable in 13 patients. HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in CSF samples when plasma RNA was undetectable. Three semen samples taken from patients with viremia <50 copies/mL showed detectable HIV-1 RNA with resistance mutations. HIV-1 RNA was detectable in all LNs, with no differences in patients on indinavir compared with those on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r. In the longitudinal analysis, HIV-1 RNA decreased in the plasma of the 6 patients on nelfinavir or lopinavir/r monotherapy, although CSF HIV-1 RNA decreased only in patients on lopinavir/r. CONCLUSION: Major differences exist between PIs in terms of detection in non-blood compartments. An undetectable PI level in CSF does not rule out drug activity in the brain for lopinavir/r, although this is not the case for nelfinavir. Poor penetration of PIs in semen in some patients can lead to double nucleoside therapy in this compartment. The persistence of HIV-1 RNA in LNs does not seem to be related to PI levels in this tissue.

Inhibition of P-glycoprotein activity at the primate blood-brain barrier increases the distribution of nelfinavir into the brain but not into the cerebrospinal fluid.

P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression at the rodent blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the central nervous system (CNS) distribution of anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs). However, it is not clear whether P-gp activity at the human BBB is as effective as that in rodents in preventing the distribution of PIs into the CNS. If it is, inhibition of P-gp at the human BBB could increase the distribution of the PIs into the CNS and, therefore, their efficacy against HIV-associated dementia. Because the distribution of the PIs into the human brain cannot be directly measured, we conducted studies in a more representative animal, the nonhuman primate. Specifically we investigated the distribution of nelfinavir (a PI and a P-gp substrate; 6 mg/kg i.v.) into the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of nonhuman primates (cynomolgus monkeys, Macaca fascicularis) in the presence and absence of the potent and selective P-gp inhibitor, zosuquidar, and whether changes in brain nelfinavir concentration, after inhibition of P-gp, paralleled those in the CSF. Our data indicate that nelfinavir has poor penetration into the macaque's brain and CSF, and P-gp inhibition at the BBB by zosuquidar enhanced the distribution of nelfinavir into the brain by 146-fold. However, the concentration of nelfinavir in the CSF was unaffected by coadministration of zosuquidar (p > 0.05). In conclusion, P-gp inhibition at the nonhuman primate BBB significantly enhanced the distribution of nelfinavir into the brain, and this effect was not observed in the CSF. Therefore, as is common in human studies investigating P-gp inhibition at the BBB, CSF concentration of a drug should not be used as a surrogate marker for brain drug concentration.

Efficacy of nelfinavir-based treatment in the central nervous system of HIV-1 infected patients.

We studied the HIV-1 load and nelfinavir (NFV) concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after long-term successful NFV-based therapy, using ultrasensitive methods of detection. 19 patients without virological failure in plasma, who had been treated with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcripaste inhibitors (NRTI) and NFV for a minimum of 18 months were included. HIV-RNA was determined in plasma and CSF using an ultrasensitive method (<2 copies/ml). Total and free concentrations of NFV were analysed using high liquid chromatography with UV-light detection. 12 out of 19 (63%) patients had <2 copies HIV-RNA/ml in CSF. Seven subjects ranged between 3 and 39 copies/ml, 2 of whom had a slightly higher viral load in CSF than in plasma. NFV was detected in CSF in 16 out of 18 patients analysed and was quantifiable in 8 patients, at concentrations ranging from 6 to 29 nM. There was no correlation between NFV concentration and HIV-RNA levels. Long-term therapy with NFV + 2 NRTI showed no increased rate of virological treatment failure within the central nervous system (CNS) in compliant patients, despite earlier reports of lack of NFV penetration to CNS. Using a highly sensitive method, NFV was detected and quantified in the CSF, although at low values, which could have contributed to the high anti-HIV-1 efficacy of the therapy seen in our subjects.

Failure to detect nelfinavir in the cerebrospinal fluid of HIV-1--infected patients with and without AIDS dementia complex.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the penetration of the HIV-1 protease inhibitor, nelfinavir, into cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). DESIGN: Nelfinavir, a commonly used HIV-1 protease inhibitor (PI), is highly effective for reducing plasma viral load. It is deployed clinically in combination with other antiretroviral agents, including nucleoside and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs and NNRTIs). Despite its potency based on plasma HIV-1 RNA results, its effectiveness in reducing HIV-1 RNA levels (i.e., viral load) in the central nervous system (CNS) is less certain. We sampled the CSF as a surrogate for brain because this fluid also is separated from the blood by a barrier to free diffusion, the blood-CSF barrier (BCB), which shares properties with the blood-brain barrier (BBB). These studies of nelfinavir CSF pharmacokinetics exploited the multiple CSF samples derived from individual study subjects who were enrolled in studies the primary objective of which was to compare viral kinetics in CSF and blood in response to antiviral therapy. METHODS: Six study subjects, four with and two without AIDS dementia complex, underwent multiple lumbar punctures (LP). Intervals of CSF sampling after drug dosing were varied (from 0.48 hours to 10.3 hours after nelfinavir administration) to quantitate nelfinavir concentrations throughout the steady-state dosing interval. In four study subjects, CSF sampling was accompanied by assessment of nelfinavir levels in plasma before and after LP, whereas in the other two subjects, a single plasma sample was obtained before or after the LP. In total, 25 CSF samples were analyzed. Nelfinavir concentrations in CSF and plasma were determined using an high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with a limit of quantitation of 25 and 50 ng/ml, respectively. RESULTS: Plasma concentrations before and after LP averaged 2420+/-1365 ng/ml and 2528+/-1132 ng/ml, respectively. Nelfinavir was not detected in any of the CSF samples and levels >25 ng/ml were not present in the CSF. Thus, standard therapy with nelfinavir does not result in CSF drug concentrations at or exceeding the IC95 level for most HIV-1 isolates. However, study subjects with high CSF viral loads experienced a marked reduction in the context of the combination-drug regimen including nelfinavir with two subjects showing a comparable CSF response with that in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Nelfinavir does not appreciably penetrate into the CSF. The clinical importance of this observation is not certain, in that in four study subjects who initiated nelfinavir in combination with other antiretroviral therapy, a comparable degree of viral suppression was obtained in both the CSF and the blood when sampled 4 weeks or later after initiating therapy.