Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women with nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The incidence rate of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is higher among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. We examined the differences in treatment and outcomes between NHB and NHW women with IBC, accounting for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: We collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for NHB and NHW women with IBC diagnosed between 2010-2016. We analyzed the odds of receiving chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery between NHB and NHW women. We evaluated overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards methods. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the risk of breast cancer death between NHB and NHW women. We also evaluated the magnitude of survival disparities within the strata of demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment factors. RESULTS: Among 1,652 NHW and 371 NHB women with IBC, the odds of receiving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation were similar for NHB and NHW. After 39-month follow-up, the median OS was 40 and 81 months for NHB and NHW, respectively (p < 0.0001). The risk of breast cancer death was higher for NHB than NHW women (5-year risk of breast cancer death, 51% vs. 35%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors; NHB women with IBC had similar odds of receiving surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but were more likely to die of the disease compared to their NHW counterparts. Our findings suggest the presence of masked tumor biology, treatment, or socioeconomic factors associated with race that can lead to worse IBC outcomes.

Incidence, characteristics, and management of central nervous system metastases in patients with inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have a high risk of central nervous system metastasis (mCNS). The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of and identify risk factors for mCNS in patients with IBC. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with IBC between 1997 and 2019. mCNS-free survival time was defined as the date from the diagnosis of IBC to the date of diagnosis of mCNS or the date of death, whichever occurred first. A competing risks hazard model was used to evaluate risk factors for mCNS. RESULTS: A total of 531 patients were identified; 372 patients with stage III and 159 patients with de novo stage IV disease. During the study, there were a total of 124 patients who had mCNS. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year incidence of mCNS was 5%, 9%, and 18% in stage III patients (median follow-up: 5.6 years) and 17%, 30%, and 42% in stage IV patients (1.8 years). Multivariate analysis identified triple-negative tumor subtype as a significant risk factor for mCNS for stage III patients. For patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, visceral metastasis as first metastatic site, triple-negative subtype, and younger age at diagnosis of metastases were risk factors for mCNS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBC, particularly those with triple-negative IBC, visceral metastasis, and those at a younger age at diagnosis of metastatic disease, are at significant risk of developing mCNS. Further investigation into prevention of mCNS and whether early detection of mCNS is associated with improved IBC patient outcomes is warranted.

Healthy Cotwins Share Gut Microbiome Signatures With Their Inflammatory Bowel Disease Twins and Unrelated Patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: It is currently unclear whether reported changes in the gut microbiome are cause or consequence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Therefore, we studied the gut microbiome of IBD-discordant and -concordant twin pairs, which offers the unique opportunity to assess individuals at increased risk of developing IBD, namely healthy cotwins from IBD-discordant twin pairs. METHODS: Fecal samples were obtained from 99 twins (belonging to 51 twin pairs), 495 healthy age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched controls, and 99 unrelated patients with IBD. Whole-genome metagenomic shotgun sequencing was performed. Taxonomic and functional (pathways) composition was compared among healthy cotwins, IBD-twins, unrelated patients with IBD, and healthy controls with multivariable (ie, adjusted for potential confounding) generalized linear models. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in the relative abundance of species and pathways between healthy cotwins and their IBD-twins (false discovery rate <0.10). Compared with healthy controls, 13, 19, and 18 species, and 78, 105, and 153 pathways were found to be differentially abundant in healthy cotwins, IBD-twins, and unrelated patients with IBD, respectively (false discovery rate <0.10). Of these, 8 (42.1%) of 19 and 1 (5.6%) of 18 species, and 37 (35.2%) of 105 and 30 (19.6%) of 153 pathways overlapped between healthy cotwins and IBD-twins, and healthy cotwins and unrelated patients with IBD, respectively. Many of the shared species and pathways have previously been associated with IBD. The shared pathways include potentially inflammation-related pathways, for example, an increase in propionate degradation and L-arginine degradation pathways. CONCLUSIONS: The gut microbiome of healthy cotwins from IBD-discordant twin pairs displays IBD-like signatures. These IBD-like microbiome signatures might precede the onset of IBD. However, longitudinal follow-up studies are needed to infer a causal relationship.

Inflammatory breast cancer defined: proposed common diagnostic criteria to guide treatment and research.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory breast cancer is a deadly and aggressive type of breast cancer. A key challenge relates to the need for a more detailed, formal, objective definition of IBC, the lack of which compromises clinical care, hampers the conduct of clinical trials, and hinders the search for IBC-specific biomarkers and treatments because of the heterogeneity of patients considered to have IBC. METHODS: Susan G. Komen, the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Milburn Foundation convened patient advocates, clinicians, and researchers to review the state of IBC and to propose initiatives to advance the field. After literature review of the defining clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of IBC, the experts developed a novel quantitative scoring system for diagnosis. RESULTS: The experts identified through consensus several "defining characteristics" of IBC, including factors related to timing of onset and specific symptoms. These reflect common pathophysiologic changes, sometimes detectable on biopsy in the form of dermal lymphovascular tumor emboli and often reflected in imaging findings. Based on the importance and extent of these characteristics, the experts developed a scoring scale that yields a continuous score from 0 to 48 and proposed cut-points for categorization that can be tested in subsequent validation studies. CONCLUSION: To move beyond subjective 'clinical diagnosis' of IBC, we propose a quantitative scoring system to define IBC, based on clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. This system is intended to predict outcome and biology, guide treatment decisions and inclusion in clinical trials, and increase diagnostic accuracy to aid basic research; future validation studies are necessary to evaluate its performance.

Incidence and survival of inflammatory breast cancer between 1973 and 2015 in the SEER database.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive variant characterized by erythema, edema, and "peau d'orange" of the skin progressing within 6 months. We assessed the incidence and survival of IBC in the US over four decades. METHODS: Using SEER*Stat, a case list of IBC patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2015 (n = 29,718) was extracted from SEER 18 registries by using a combination of morphology, stage, and extent of disease criteria. M1 and M0 patients were included. Age-adjusted incidence rates, relative survival rates, and mean survival time were calculated. Significance was determined as non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The overall incidence of IBC from 1973 to 2015 is 2.76 (2.73, 2.79) cases per 100,000 people, with white patients having an incidence rate of 2.63 (2.60, 2.67), black patients 4.52 (4.39, 4.65), and patients of other race 1.84 (1.76, 1.93). The overall IBC relative 5-year survival rate is 40.5% (39.0%, 42.0%), 42.5% (40.7%, 44.3%), and 29.9% (26.6%, 33.3%) for white patients and black patients, respectively. Patients diagnosed in 1978-1982 have a mean survival time of 62.3 (52.0, 72.6) months, while those diagnosed in 2008-2012 have mean survival time of 99.4 (96.4, 102.4) months. There is no significant difference in survival time between T4D patients and patients with other T staging and extent of disease coding consistent with clinical IBC presentation. CONCLUSIONS: IBC survival has increased over four decades. Despite the improvement in survival for all racial groups, a persistent survival disparity that has not narrowed over two decades remains between white and black patients.

Inflammatory breast cancer: early recognition and diagnosis is critical.

Inflammatory breast cancer is a rare and aggressive malignancy that is often initially misdiagnosed because of its similar presentation to more benign breast pathologies such as mastitis, resulting in treatment delays. Presenting symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer include erythema, skin changes such as peau d' orange or nipple inversion, edema, and warmth of the affected breast. The average age at diagnosis is younger than in noninflammatory breast cancer cases. Known risk factors include African American race and obesity. Diagnostic criteria include erythema occupying at least one-third of the breast, edema, peau d' orange, and/or warmth, with or without an underlying mass; a rapid onset of <3 months; and pathologic confirmation of invasive carcinoma. Treatment of inflammatory breast cancer includes trimodal therapy with chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. An aggressive surgical approach that includes a modified radical mastectomy enhances survival outcomes. Although the outcomes for patients with inflammatory breast cancer are poor compared with those of patients with noninflammatory breast cancer, patients with inflammatory breast cancer who complete trimodal therapy have a favorable locoregional control rate, underscoring the importance of a prompt diagnosis of this serious but treatable disease. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other primary care providers must recognize the signs and symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer to make a timely diagnosis and referral for specialized care.

Risk factors for inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer in North Africa.

PURPOSE: Studies of the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a rare but aggressive breast cancer, have been hampered by limited risk factor information. We extend previous studies by evaluating a broader range of risk factors. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, we conducted a case-control study of IBC at six centers in Egypt, Tunisia, and Morocco; enrolled were 267 IBC cases and for comparison 274 non-IBC cases and 275 controls, both matched on age and geographic area to the IBC cases. We administered questionnaires and collected anthropometric measurements for all study subjects. We used multiple imputation methods to account for missing values and calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using polytomous logistic regression comparing each of the two case groups to the controls, with statistical tests for the difference between the coefficients for the two case groups. RESULTS: After multivariable adjustment, a livebirth within the previous 2 years (OR 4.6; 95% CI 1.8 to 11.7) and diabetes (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0) were associated with increased risk of IBC, but not non-IBC (OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.3 to 2.5 and OR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5 to 1.6 for livebirth and diabetes, respectively). A family history of breast cancer, inflammatory-like breast problems, breast trauma, and low socioeconomic status were associated with increased risk of both tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: We identified novel risk factors for IBC and non-IBC, some of which preferentially increased risk of IBC compared to non-IBC. Upon confirmation, these findings could help illuminate the etiology and aid in prevention of this aggressive cancer.

Characteristics associated with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): An epidemiologic study from a dedicated IBC program.

There are scant data identifying epidemiologic characteristics among individuals diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is considered the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the epidemiologic features among patients seen at a dedicated IBC program, to elucidate the potential causes of this disease and guide prevention strategies. We reviewed retrospective data from 447 patients enrolled in an IRB-approved IBC registry through Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 1997 to 2016. The data examined included the following: demographics, medical, reproductive and family history, duration of symptoms prior to the diagnosis of IBC, pathologic characteristics, and clinical outcome. JMP statistical software was used to compile the data. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the data. The majority of patients (66.0%) were overweight or obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥25) at the time of diagnosis. Fifty patients (11.1%) had "secondary" IBC, defined as developing IBC after a previous history of non-IBC breast cancer in an ipsilateral breast. Of those patients with secondary IBC, 60% were also overweight or obese at the time of IBC diagnosis. Approximately 58% of IBC patients had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer, including first- and second-degree relatives. This analysis suggested a high frequency of familial breast/ovarian cancer among IBC patients which supports further evaluating genetic risks. This may have implications for screening and prevention strategies as well as insight into additional contributing risk factors. The prevalence of a high BMI among both pre- and postmenopausal women with IBC, including those diagnosed with secondary IBC, warrants focusing on strategies targeting the obesity crisis as a potential means of reducing the risk of developing this disease.

Prevalence of germline variants in inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an uncommon and aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with early disease recurrence and short survival. The prevalence of germline variants in cancer predisposition genes has not been systematically evaluated in women with IBC. METHODS: Among 301 women enrolled in the clinical IBC registry at a single institution between 2010 and 2017, 168 had documented genetic testing. A second cohort of 200 IBC cases who had panel-based germline testing performed through a commercial testing laboratory from 2012 to 2017 was added to the analyses. Personal and family cancer histories and genetic testing results were evaluated when they were available for both cohorts. RESULTS: Among 501 IBC cases, 368 had documented genetic testing. Germline mutations (56 total) were identified in 53 cases (14.4%). BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were found in 7.3% of the subjects, 6.3% had a mutation in other breast cancer genes (PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, and BARD1), and 1.6% had mutations in genes not associated with breast cancer. The prevalence of mutations was 24% (22 of 92) among women with triple-negative IBC, 13% (13 of 99) among women with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease, and 9.3% (10 of 108) among women with HER2-positive IBC. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and diversity of germline genetic mutations among patients with IBC suggest that further studies should be performed to assess the role of inherited mutations in IBC carcinogenesis in comparison with non-IBC breast cancer. Since IBC has a high metastatic potential associated with poor prognostic outcomes, proposed future studies may also inform targeted treatment options.

Breast cancer histologic subtypes show excess familial clustering.

BACKGROUND: The inherited predisposition to developing specific histologic subtypes of invasive breast carcinoma has been incompletely investigated. By using a large, population-based database, the authors sought to investigate familial clustering of breast cancer by histologic subtype. METHODS: By using the Utah Population Database, which links genealogy records to the National Cancer Institute's statewide Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry, the authors identified patients with breast cancer by histology and tested for evidence of shared genetic predisposition to histologic specific subtypes by examining pairwise relatedness and estimating the relative risk (RR) among first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree relatives. RESULTS: The authors identified 23,629 individuals in the Utah Population Database who had at least 3 generations of genealogy and at least 1 primary breast cancer, 2883 (12.2%) of which were specific histologic subtypes other than invasive ductal carcinoma (including inflammatory [n = 178], lobular [n = 1688], and mucinous [n = 542]). Statistically significant excess distant relatedness was identified for the mucinous subtype (P = .011) as well as for inflammatory breast cancers (P = .024). The RR for breast cancer of any histology in second-degree relatives was significantly increased for patients with inflammatory (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68; P = .03), lobular (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.47; P < .001), and mucinous (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.44; P = .00021) subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence for significant familial clustering within histological subtypes for lobular, mucinous, and inflammatory breast carcinomas. Further research is required to identify the underlying genetic variants responsible for the increased risk. Studies of high-risk pedigrees segregating a specific histologic subtype could be a powerful design for predisposition gene identification.

Inflammatory and other breast cancer incidence rate trends by estrogen receptor status in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2001-2015).

PURPOSE: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) rates increased in the United States before the turn of the twenty-first century. We examine trends by estrogen receptor (ER) status since then. METHODS: Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program for years 2001-2015, we calculated age-adjusted incidence rates for IBC (defined by AJCC TNM category T4d, extent of disease codes, and morphology code 8530) by ER status, which was imputed if unknown, among women aged 25-84 years. For comparison, we included other locally advanced breast cancer and other breast cancers partitioned into localized and regional/distant/unstaged. We fit joinpoint log-linear models to annual rates to calculate annual percentage change (APC) and average annual percentage change (AAPC). RESULTS: The rate of increase in ER+ IBC rates among women aged 25-44 (AAPC = 0.5) was similar to other advanced tumor types, but declines among women aged 45-84 (AAPC = - 2.2) were more rapid. Declines in ER- IBC rates for women aged 25-84 (AAPC = - 3.7) were more rapid than for other tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show a reversal of the rising rates of IBC overall reported at the end of the twentieth century. Direction of trends for IBC is consistent with other breast cancer types, except for ER+ localized breast cancer in older women. Decreasing parity and rising prevalence of older age at first birth may contribute to declining rates of ER- IBC. Otherwise, patterns of changing risk factors are inconsistent with the trends we observed. Further studies of IBC are necessary to identify additional risk factors and possible preventive strategies.

Marital status is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer patients: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to study the impact of marital status on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients, as the prognostic impact is yet to be studied in detail. METHODS: Data of IBC patients from 2004 to 2010 were sorted out from the database of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER), and overall survival (OS) rates and breast cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were compared between a group of married and unmarried patients. The comparison was performed by Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test, and multivariate survival analysis of CSS and OS was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Data of 1342 patients were collected from the SEER database, on an average 52% of married patients (n = 698, 52.01%) and 48% of unmarried patients (n = 644, 47.99%) for this analysis. Married patients were more likely to be more younger (aged ≤ 56) (52.44% vs. 43.94%), white ethnicity (83.24% vs. 71.58%), HoR positive (48.28% vs. 41.61%), more patients received surgery (78.51% vs. 64.60%), chemotherapy (90.69% vs. 80.12%) and radiotherapy (53.44% vs. 44.41%) compared to unmarried group, and less likely to be AJCC stage IV (26.22% vs. 35.40%) (All P ˂ 0.05). Married patients had better 5-year CSS (74.90% vs. 65.55%, P < 0.0001) and OS rates (45.43% vs. 33.11%, P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis revealed that marital status is an independent prognostic factor, whereas the data of unmarried patients showed worse CSS (HR 1.188; 95% CI 1.033-1.367; P = 0.016) and OS rates (HR 1.245; 95% CI 1.090-1.421; P = 0.001).The subgroup analysis further revealed that the OS and CSS rates in the married group were better than the unmarried group, regardless of different AJCC stages. CONCLUSION: Marital status was an independent prognostic indicator in IBC patients. As the study reveals, the CSS and OS rates of the married patients were better than those of the unmarried patients.

Racial/ethnic disparities in inflammatory breast cancer survival in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program.

PURPOSE: While racial disparities in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) incidence are fairly well documented, with black women having significantly higher rates compared to white women; less is known about whether IBC prognosis differs by race/ethnicity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess racial/ethnic disparities in survival among women diagnosed with IBC in the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP) from 1998 to 2014. METHODS: We examined the frequency and percentage of breast cancer cases coded to the various IBC codes in the MCSP registry over the study period. We used age-adjusted and multivariable Cox Proportional hazard regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of race/ethnicity with all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Using a comprehensive case definition of IBC, 1324 IBC patients were identified from women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the MCSP [Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) = 227; Non-Hispanic White (NHW) = 984; Hispanic = 86; other = 27]. The percentage of all breast cancer cases defined as IBC in the MCSP registry differs considerably across registry codes from 0.02 to 1.1%. We observed significantly higher risk of death among NHB compared with NHW [HR (95% CI), 1.21 (1.01-1.45)], while no significant survival differences were observed between NHW and Hispanics or other racial/ethnic minorities. CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive case definition should be utilized to avoid underestimation of IBC and to better understand this aggressive disease. Further research is needed to identify underlying causes and develop effective interventions to reduce IBC survival disparities between NHB and NHW women.

Inflammatory breast cancer outcomes by breast cancer subtype: a population-based study.

AIM: To assess the outcomes of breast cancer subtype in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed IBC patients from the SEER program. RESULTS: We identified 626 patients, including 230 (36.7%),100 (17.6%), 113 (18.1%), and 173 (27.6%) patients with HoR+/HER2-, HoR+/HER2+, HoR-/HER2+, and HoR-/HER2- subtype disease, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that, using HoR+/HER2- subtype as reference, patients with HoR+/HER2+ subtype had better breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS), and patients with HoR-/HER2- subtype had worse BCSS and OS, while BCSS and OS were comparable for HoR-/HER2+ subtype. Similar trends were observed in patients who received surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy or trimodality therapy. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer subtype is clinically useful for predicting survival outcome in IBC. The HoR+/HER2- subtype shows poorer survival outcome than HoR+/HER2+ subtype.

Factors associated with improved outcomes for metastatic inflammatory breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the role of locoregional therapy for stage IV inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). This study aims to determine indicators of prognosis, including primary tumor resection, for stage IV IBC patients. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Data Base, female patients diagnosed 2010-2013 with unilateral a priori metastatic T4d invasive adenocarcinoma of the breast were identified. We conducted propensity score matched analysis to balance confounders of surgery versus no-surgery. Stratified log-rank test and double-robust estimation under the Cox model were used to assess the effect of surgery, and margins, on overall survival (OS) in the propensity score matched cohort. RESULTS: Of 1266 patients, 41% underwent surgery. In the unmatched cohort, median OS of the surgery and no-surgery groups was 36 and 20 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In the matched cohort (n = 588), the median OS of surgery and no-surgery groups was 29 and 27 months, respectively (p = 0.052). Patients with negative margin surgery (p = 0.024), hormone receptor-positive (p = 0.019), HER2-positive disease (p < 0.0001), treated with chemotherapy (p < 0.0001) and hormonal therapy (p < 0.0001), had better survival. Those with brain metastases had increased risk of death (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest cohort of metastatic IBC patients, and identified negative margin surgery, systemic therapy, hormone receptor and HER2-positive disease as factors associated with improved outcomes. While these findings should be interpreted cautiously, they may be used to guide further investigations into local control and quality of life in this patient population with limited treatment options.

Inflammatory breast cancer in the Netherlands; improved survival over the last decades.

PURPOSE: Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) includes inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) as well as non-inflammatory LABC (NI-LABC). The aim of this population-based study was to compare the tumour characteristics, treatment and relative survival of IBC and NI-LABC patients. METHODS: Patients with either IBC (cT4d) or NI-LABC (cT4a-c) were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry from the period 1989-2015. In each group, patients are divided into three time periods in order to perform a trend analysis: 1989-1997, 1998-2006, and 2007-2015. RESULTS: IBC comprised 1.1% and NI-LABC 4.6% of all diagnosed breast cancer patients. IBC patients showed more nodal metastases (77.8 vs. 69.7%, P < 0.001) and distant metastases (39.7 vs. 34.1%, P < 0.001). IBC tumours were more often triple negative (23.2 vs. 12.8%, P < 0.001) and poorly differentiated (69.8 vs. 53.8%, P < 0.001). Trimodality therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy) was more often applied over time in both groups (IBC: 23.7%-56.0%-68.6%; NI-LABC: 3.7%-25.9%-43.6%; P trend < 0.001). In IBC patients, relative 5-year survival was significantly shorter than in patients with NI-LABC (30.2 vs. 45.1%, P < 0.001). The relative survival significantly improved for IBC from 17.2% (1989-1997) to 30.0 and 38.9% for the last two time periods (1998-2006: P < 0.001; 2007-2015: P < 0.001). In contrast, survival did not significantly improve in NI-LABC breast cancer: from 44.7% (1989-1997) to 44.0 and 48.4% (1998-2006: P = 0.483; 2007-2015: P = 0.091). CONCLUSIONS: IBC has tumour characteristics that determine its aggressive biology compared to NI-LABC. Trimodality therapy was increasingly applied in both groups, but did not improve survival in NI-LABC. Although relative survival in IBC patients has improved during the last decades, it remains a disease with a dismal prognosis.

Thrombocytosis as a prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Platelets are essential components of hemostasis and also play an important role in the tumor microenvironment. The purposes of our research were to examine the role of thrombocytosis in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and to know which cytokine drives thrombocytosis. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 3654 patients with stage I-III breast cancer treated between 1998 and 2013, including 230 patients (6%) with IBC. We used Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test to compare the variables between patients with and without thrombocytosis. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to determine the association of thrombocytosis with overall survival. We also examined baseline serum cytokine levels in 81 patients with primary IBC to determine the association of inflammatory cytokines with thrombocytosis. RESULTS: We found that thrombocytosis was the only variable that predicted prognosis. Fifty-five patients (1.5%) had thrombocytosis. Thrombocytosis was more prevalent in patients with IBC than in those with non-IBC (3.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.015). In patients with IBC, thrombocytosis was associated with worse overall survival [hazard ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-5.4, p = 0.0378]. Circulating levels of growth-regulated oncogene (GRO) (odds ratio 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, p = 0.0019) and transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.128-1.499, p = 0.0003) were associated with thrombocytosis. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombocytosis was more prevalent in patients with IBC than in those with non-IBC and it was associated with poor prognosis. GRO and TGF-ß were associated with thrombocytosis in IBC.

Inflammatory breast cancer: the disease, the biology, the treatment.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form of invasive breast cancer accounting for 2.5% of all breast cancer cases. It is characterized by rapid progression, local and distant metastases, younger age of onset, and lower overall survival compared with other breast cancers. Historically, IBC is a lethal disease with less than a 5% survival rate beyond 5 years when treated with surgery or radiation therapy. Because of its rarity, IBC is often misdiagnosed as mastitis or generalized dermatitis. This review examines IBC's unique clinical presentation, pathology, epidemiology, imaging, and biology and details current multidisciplinary management of the disease, which comprises systemic therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy.

Inflammatory and Non-inflammatory Breast Cancer: A Potential Role for Detection of Multiple Viral DNAs in Disease Progression.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most lethal form of breast cancer. Multiple viral infections in IBC tissues were found to be associated with disease pathogenesis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to correlate the incidence of viral DNA with breast cancer progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 135 women diagnosed with breast cancer were enrolled in this study. Using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing assays, we determined the incidence of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (HPV-16 and -18), human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), Epstein-Barr virus, human herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, and human herpes virus type 8 (HHV-8) in breast carcinoma tissue biopsies. We also assessed the expression of the cell proliferation marker Ki-67 by immunohistochemistry in association with the incidence of viral DNA. RESULTS: HCMV and HPV-16 were the most detected viral DNAs in breast carcinoma tissues; however, the frequency of HCMV and HHV-8 DNA were significantly higher in IBC than non-IBC tissues. Moreover, the prevalence of multiple viral DNAs was higher in IBC than non-IBC tissues. The incidence of multiple viral DNAs positively correlates with tumor size and number of metastatic lymph nodes in both non-IBC and IBC patients. The expression of Ki-67 was found to be significantly higher in both non-IBC and IBC tissues in which multiple viral DNAs were detected. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of multiple viral DNAs in IBC tissues was higher compared with non-IBC tissues. The present results suggest the possibility of a functional relationship between the presence of multiple viral DNAs and disease pathogenesis.